meeting #1 - montgomery county public...

Meeting #1February 17, 2016

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Rockville, Maryland

Agenda Review Ground Rules Roundtable charge, process, and schedule Review Development Information Review Long-term enrollment projections


Ground Rules Share openly Give and receive constructive feedback Appreciate everyone’s ideas Suspend judgment Limit discussions to the topic Do homework and be prepared Abide by decisions made by the facilitator Start and end meetings on time


Board of Education ResolutionNovember 16, 2015 Resolved, That a Walter Johnson Roundtable Discussion Group be conducted in spring

2016 to include representatives from each of the Walter Johnson Cluster schools and the Walter Johnson cluster coordinators

Resolved, That the Walter Johnson Cluster Roundtable Discussion Group considers general approaches to addressing near-term and long-term enrollment increases at cluster elementary schools, middle schools, and the high school

Resolved, That approaches to be considered may include use of closed schools in the cluster, including four former elementary schools—Ayrlawn, Alta Vista, Kensington, and Montrose—and the former Charles W. Woodward High School

Resolved, That the Walter Johnson Cluster Roundtable Discussion Group limits its review of approaches to the Walter Johnson ClusterResolved, That the Walter Johnson Cluster Roundtable Discussion Group is not to consider specific boundary changes as part of its process

Resolved, That the Walter Johnson Cluster Roundtable Discussion Group submits a report that includes member evaluations of a range of approaches to the interim superintendent of schools and members of the Board of Education by June 2016.


Roundtable Charge Interim superintendent provides charge to the Roundtable

Discussion Group. Charge directs Roundtable to discuss general approaches to solve

the near-term and long-term enrollment increases and solve the projected space deficits in the elementary, middle, and high schools in the Walter Johnson Cluster.

Look at closed schools in the cluster. Woodward High School Alta Vista Elementary School Arylawn Elementary School Grosvenor Elementary School Kensington Elementary School Montrose Elementary School

Roundtable will evaluate approaches at the end of the process.


Roundtable Process Guided by the BOE Long-range Educational Facilities

Planning Policy (FAA) and MCPS Regulation (FAA-RA).

Roundtable serves in an advisory role to the superintendent who will make recommendations for Board consideration.

No specific boundary changes will be considered by the Roundtable.

No recommendations or decisions will be made as part of the roundtable discussion group.


Roundtable Member Role Will develop criteria to help develop and evaluate

approaches. Will brainstorm possible approaches to solve the space

deficits in the Walter Johnson Cluster schools. Roundtable members will schedule meetings with the

school communities they represent to obtain feedback on the approaches.

Roundtable members will report out on the feedback they have received, and additional approaches may be developed.


MCPS Staff Role Facilitate all meetings.

Prepare all materials and develop additional approaches if appropriate.

Invite staff from MCPS and other agencies to meet with the Roundtable as appropriate.

Draft final report of the Roundtable.


Roundtable Report Report will include the following:

Background information Description of Approaches Pros and Cons of each approach Roundtable Member evaluations PTA position papers, if submitted

Report submitted to superintendent and Board for consideration

No recommendation or decisions included in report


Roundtable MeetingsMeeting Activities1 Feb. 17 Process, Housing Development, Enrollment Projections

2 Feb. 24 Develop Criteria, Brainstorm Secondary School Approaches

3 Mar. 2 Review and discuss secondary school approaches

4 Mar. 16 Share pluses/minuses. Brainstorm elementary school approaches. Determine if additional secondary school approaches are needed.

5 Apr. 6 Review and discuss elementary school approaches/secondary school approaches. Continue discussion of secondary school approaches.

6 Apr. 21 Share pluses/minuses of elementary school approaches. Determine if additional elementary school approaches are needed.

7 May 4 Review additional approaches as needed. Continue discussion. Review items for report

-- May 11 2nd Public Information Meeting—Present Approaches

8 May 18 Share pluses/minuses of elementary school approaches if needed. Finalize report.

PTAs will schedule meetings to share approaches/gather feedback.


Superintendent and BOE Schedule June 1, 2016 Roundtable Report

Mid-October 2016 Superintendent’s Recommendation

Early November 2016 Board of Education Work session

Mid-November 2016 Board of Education Public Hearing

November 2016 Board of Education Action

White Flint Sector PlanRock Spring Master Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning CommissionMaryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission

White Flint Sector PlanM i d t o w n o n t h e P i k e

1

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning CommissionMaryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission 2

Plan AreaWhite Flint Sector Plan

A m e n d m e n t t o t h e 1 9 9 2 N o r t h B e t h e s d a - G a r r e t t P a r k M a s t e r P l a n

4 3 0 a c r e s

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Plan Area ConceptWhite Flint Sector Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


H i g h e s t F l o o r A r e a R a t i o ( F A R ) a t t h e M e t r o a n d a l o n g M D 3 5 5

L o w e r d e n s i t i e s a n d h e i g h t s t o w a r d s e x i s t i n g n e i g h b o r h o o d s

4

Overall FrameworkWhite Flint Sector Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


L o c a l n e t w o r k o f s t r e e t sC o m m e r c i a l b u s i n e s s s t r e e t sM a j o r h i g h w a y s

5

Existing and Proposed Street Network White Flint Sector Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Metro West Metro East6

Capital Improvements ProgramWhite Flint Sector Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


s a t e l l i t e r e g i o n a l s e r v i c e s c e n t e r

l i b r a r y c i v i c g r e e n

f i r e a n d e m e r g e n c ys e r v i c e s

p o l i c e s u b s t a t i o nr e n o v a t e w a l l p a r ke x p a n d w h i t e f l i n t

n e i g h b o r h o o d p a r kf a r m e r s ’ m a r k e t

7

Community FacilitiesWhite Flint Sector Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


PhasingWhite Flint Sector Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Staging of Development White Flint Sector Plan

All SAR units have been allocated at Pike & Rose-Phase I and II

9

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


1 Pike &Rose

2 Gables White Flint

3 Saul Centers

4 NoBe II

5 North Bethesda Center

6 North Bethesda Gateway

1

2

64

5

3 3

7

7 White Flint Mall

10

8 Offutt Estates

8

Development LocationsWhite Flint Sector Plan

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Pipeline ProjectsWhite Flint Sector Plan

Project Name Approved Development Status

North Bethesda Center Residential:1,350 dwelling unitsNon-Residential:1.3 million square feet

Partially BuiltWentworth House: 312 dwelling units and 61, 246 sq.ft of retail Aurora: 341dwelling unitsNRC Office: 352, 622 sq.ft.

North Bethesda Market/NoBe Residential:440 dwelling unitsNon-Residential:223,000 square feet

BuiltResidential:411 dwelling units Non-Residential: 209,200 sq.ft.

White Flint View Residential: 183 dwelling unitsNon-Residential: 29,500 square feet

Unbuilt

Holladay/Saul Centers Residential: 247 dwelling units Non-Residential: 201,822 square feet

Unbuilt; included in Saul Centers White Flint (West Side) Site Plan.

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


New DevelopmentWhite Flint Sector Plan

Pike and Rose-Phase I

Gables White Flint

Saul Centers-West

Saul Centers-East

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T



North Bethesda Gateway

East Village at North Bethesda Gateway

Nobe II

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


White Flint Mall Approved Sketch Plan Residential: 2,459 dwelling units

Non-Residential: Retail: 1.0 million Square Feet Office: 1.0 million Square Feet Hotel: 279, 175 Square Feet (300 keys)

Future

14

New DevelopmentWhite Flint Sector PlanFuture

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T



Ouffett Estates

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Land Area: 455 acresExisting Residential: 1,904 dwelling units Existing Non-Residential: 6.44 million square feet

Planning Area

16

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Walter Johnson Cluster RoundtableFebruary 17, 2016

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Region and Schools Cluster

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Plan Area

A m e n d m e n t t o t h e 1 9 9 2 N o r t h B e t h e s d a -G a r r e t t P a r k M a s t e r P l a n

5 3 5 a c r e s

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


E m p l o y m e n t O f f i c e Z o n i n g i n t h e m i d d l e .

M i x o f G e n e r a l a n d N e i g h b o r h o o d R e t a i l & C o m m e r c i a l / R e s i d e n t i a l Z o n i n g t o t h e e a s t & w e s t .

R e s i d e n t i a l z o n i n g a t W a l t e r J o h n s o n & p a r k i n g a r e a s o f W i l d w o o d S h o p p i n g C e n t e r .

20

Existing Zoning

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Development Locations

12

3

4

1

2

3

4

Ourisman Ford

EYA –Montgomery Row

Rock Spring Center

Aubinoe Residential Building

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Pipeline ProjectsRock Spring Master Plan

Project Name Approved Development Status

Rock Spring Center Residential:1,250 dwelling unitsNon-Residential:1.05 million SF

Partially Built: Berkshire Apts -386 dwelling units

Remainder unbuilt

EYA – Montgomery Row Residential:168 dwelling unitsNon-Residential: n/a

Under construction

Ourisman Ford Residential: 340 dwelling unitsNon-Residential: 54,000 SF

Unbuilt

Aubinoe Residential Building Residential: 58 dwelling units Non-Residential: n/a

Unbuilt

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


Pipeline DevelopmentRock Spring Master Plan

Residential Site

Rock Spring Center Ourisman

EYA-Montgomery Row Aubinoe Residential

MO

NTG

OM

ERY CO

UN

TY PLANN

ING

DEPAR

TMEN

T


www.montgomeryplanning.org/community/whiteflint/

White Flint Sector Plan

White Flint 2 Sector Plan www.montgomeryplanning.org/community/whiteflint2/

Public Information Project Websites

Rock Spring Master Planwww.montgomeryplanning.org/community/rockspring/

http://www.montgomeryplanning.org/community/whiteflint/

http://www.montgomeryplanning.org/community/whiteflint2/

http://www.montgomeryplanning.org/community/whiteflint2/

Enrollment Projections, Housing Developments and Master Plans

Bruce Crispell. DirectorDivision of Long-range Planning

February 17, 2016


Enrollment Projections


Enro

llmen

t Pro

ject

ions


Updated Housing Yield Factors


Southwest Housing Yield Rates Compared to WJ Cluster Rates


Master Plans White Flint Sector Plan—Approved 2010

Phase 1—3,000 units planned, 861 units allocated to date (Pike & Rose)

Phase 2—3,000 units planned; prerequisites required such as road realignments and other improvements

Phase 3—3,800 units planned; transportation capacity must be committed

White Flint II Sector Plan—Under Development

Rock Spring Master Plan—Under Development


Estimated Number of Students at Full Build-out of White Flint Sector Plan


Estimated Number of Elementary Students at Each Phase


Estimated Number of Middle School Students at Each Phase


Estimated Number of High School Students at Each Phase