mema regional forum 2012
DESCRIPTION
MEMA Regional Forum 2012. Amman, October 3 rd , 2012. Agenda. GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities 2012-2015 OGSM 2012/2013 Update GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities 2012-2015 (Details) Strengthen The Core Become a Key Player in the Connected World (internet) Winning and Engaging New Strategic Sectors - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
© 2012 GS1
Agenda
• GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities 2012-2015• OGSM 2012/2013 Update• GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities 2012-2015 (Details)
1. Strengthen The Core2. Become a Key Player in the Connected World (internet)3. Winning and Engaging New Strategic Sectors4. Step Change Brand Awareness5. Continue Developing a World Class, Interdependent
Organization• GS1 Management Board• The Consumer Goods Forum (CGF)
2
© 2012 GS1
Top 5 Priorities 2012/15 – MB Approved
1. Continue strengthening our Core: providing Excellent Service to our Core Strategic Sectors (Retail, Healthcare, and Transport & Logistics) by driving the GS1 System (AIDC, eCom, GDSN, and EPC)
2. Become a key player in the connected world (internet) by:• Business-to-Consumer (B2C)• Data Quality (DQ)• Visibility
3. Winning and engaging New Strategic Sectors
4. Step-change GS1 Brand Awareness by implementing the new Brand Architecture
5. Continue developing a world-class, interdependent organisation
4Driving Momentum Together
© 2012 GS1
OGSM Q1 Update – Where-to-Play
6
© 2012 GS17
OGSM Q1 Update – How-to-Win
© 2012 GS1
Top 5 Priorities 2012/15 – MB Approved
1. Continue strengthening our Core: providing Excellent Service to our Core Strategic Sectors (Retail, Healthcare, and Transport & Logistics) by driving the GS1 System (AIDC, eCom, GDSN, and EPC)
2. Become a key player in the connected world (internet) by:• Business-to-Consumer (B2C)• Data Quality (DQ)• Visibility
3. Winning and engaging New Strategic Sectors
4. Step-change GS1 Brand Awareness by implementing the new Brand Architecture
5. Continue developing a world-class, interdependent organisation
9Driving Momentum Together
© 2012 GS1
AIDC Data Carrier AdoptionTrends
12
Mature deployment for EAN/UPC, GS1-128, ITF14
Promotion of RFID in EAS applications
Trending adoption of GS1 DataBar on Fresh Foods
Trending adoption for GS1 DataMatrix in Healthcare
Promotion of 2D for B2C Extended Packaging
© 2012 GS1
Implementer’s View AIDC Data Carrier Adoption Today
13
AIDC Carrier by Use Case Fixed Measure Consumer Items
Variable Measure Consumer Items
B2C Extended Packaging
General Retail Consumer Items
EAN/UPCGS1 DataBar
GS1 DataBar GS1 DataMatrix, GS1 QR Code
General Retail Distribution Scanning Only
EAN/UPC, GS1-128, ITF14 GS1 DataBar
GS1-128, GS1 DataBar NA
Regulated Healthcare Retail Consumer Items
EAN/UPC, GS1 DataMatrix, GS1 DataBar
GS1 DataMatrix, GS1 DataBar
GS1 DataMatrix
Regulated Healthcare Non-Retail Consumer Items
EAN/UPC, GS1-128, ITF14, Composite Comp., GS1 DataBar, GS1 DataMatrix
GS1-128, GS1 DataBar GS1 DataMatrix
GS1 DataMatrix
Regulated Healthcare Distribution Scanning Only
EAN/UPC, GS1-128, ITF14, GS1 DataBarGS1 DataMatrix
EAN/UPC, GS1-128, ITF-14, GS1 DataBar GS1 DataMatrix
NA
Non-Retail (e.g.: Industrial Commercial, Food Service)
EAN/UPC, GS1-128, ITF14, GS1 DataBar
GS1-128GS1 DataBar
NA
Mature Deployment / Early Deployment
© 2012 GS1
AIDC Data Carrier AdoptionChallenges
14
Management1. Sunrise vs. Driving Adoption
• Be aligned that GS1 cannot set sunrise dates for a carrier. GS1 can actively promote a carrier for an application but adoption is a mutual agreement of trading partners
• Be aligned on new carriers and existing sunrise dates (e.g. DataBar in ‘14)
2. Common AIDC Investment Direction• Ensure MOs provide common AIDC investment advice to industry
Research and Development3. POS Technology Gap for FMCG
• Resolve POS Technology Gap to provide “dynamic data” (expiry dates, serial numbers) in AIDC on all POS products
Bar Code Conformance
Objective• Complete 1D Test Center deployment in 12 MOs by December 2012
Status• Approved: GS1 Starting and Managing GS1 Bar Code Verification Service
Guideline • In eBallot: GS1 Bar Code Verification Process Guideline
Issues• None
Next Steps• Update Conformance Training Materials and Marketing/Communications • Draft AIDC Test Plan to analyze current Bar Code minimums (if too restrictive)• Complete 3rd Party Accreditation Proposal 16
OGSM Measure FY12/13 Status
Complete 1D Test Center deployment in 10 EU MOs plus New Zealand and Australia by December 2012
On target
GS1 Bar Code Conformance 3Y Plan2012
Validate Current Bar
Code Minimum Specifications
Work in progress or planned
2013
2014
2D Conformance
1D Conformance
Deploy 12 MOs
Ratified standard or work finalized
Update Standards
Training & Marketing Updates
Deploy 12 MOs
Complete Guidelines
Training & Marketing Updates
Accreditation Proposal
Accreditation Proposal
VerifiersAvailable
Complete Guidelines
Complete testing & initiate Standards Updates
Update Standards…
Approve New
Standards
Draft Plan
Work requested by MOs
17
GS1 eCom Update
Objective• Execute GS1 eCom Strategy
Progress• GS1 XML
• eCom Major Release 3 – ratified and published• Support material published
• GS1 XML Technical User Guide Release 3• Standard Business Document Header (SBDH) Version 1.3 Technical
Implementation Guide• Transport management implementation guide
• Deployment projects launched with 6 MOs (see O2C update)
Issues• No current issues
Next Steps• EANCOM 2002 Edition 2012 (End 2012)• AS4 Protocol guideline & profile, incl. update of AS2 guide (2013)• XML 3.1 incl. Intelligent Packaging (2012) and Warehousing (2013)
19
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Forecast
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
GS1 eCom adoption 2005 - 2011
Web EDI
GS1 EANCOM
GS1 XML
eCom implementation trends
20
21
Order-to-Cash Deployment
Objective• Increase GS1 eCom adoption in Order-to-Cash by providing MOs with best
practices in local deployment
Progress• 6 MOs engaged in deployment phase (GS1 Belgium, Chili, Brazil, Italy, China,
South Africa)• Regional training in Chile in May 2012
Issues• None
Next Steps• On-going support to MOs in deployment phase (training, marketing plan,
implementation support)• Regional training in China in Fall 2012
OGSM Measure FY12/13 Status
Deployment completed from 6 to 8 MOs by June 2013 On target
GDSN Operations and Strategy Execution
Objective• Execute GDSN 2012 / 2013 OGSM
Progress• 10+ Million items registered (+21% over last year, FY start: July 1, 2011)• 24,610 trading partners registered (+22% over last year, FY start: July 1, 2011) • 153 countries; 30 certified DPs• GPC: 8.71+ Million GTINs in Global Registry coded with GPC (87%)• Country Expansion Programme for Healthcare – In Progress• Data Quality Strategy Renewal – In Progress
Issues• None at this time
Next Steps• Maintenance Release 5 and GPC – Deployment to Production October 2012• Major Release and Certification Event (Modular Item) – Dates TBD via Network
Deployment Strategy
23
EPC Update (1/2)
Objective• Drive adoption of EPCglobal Standards, focusing on 2 key sectors (Apparel and T&L)
Progress• Extensive adoption of EPC in Apparel and General Merchandise driven by Wal-Mart
• Strong focus on Item-Level tagging at source• (Re-)launch of Apparel, Fashion & Footwear User Group
• NFC Forum: MoU signed and in implementation phase• EPC Board extension with 5 new Governors : GS1 Canada, Macy’s, Gerry Weber, DHL
& C&A.• EPC IP Subcommittee: Extensive work to re-examine Round Rock patents in the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO).
25
OGSM Measure FY12/13 Status
EPC BoG approval of new EPCglobal OGSM by June 2013 On Target
GSMP Update
1. Merge of old GSMP and EPCglobal standard development processes completed
2. New communication and educational materials available on-line (full transparency of project status to users and MOs)
3. Start of GSMP Best In Class project to be completed in June 2013
27
GSMP Membershipas of 30 June 2012
28
Dec 31, 2011
March 31, 2012
June 30, 2012
Total Company Participation
New GSMP245 268 284
Additional Companies Operating only in Former GSMP Groups
65(5 groups)
8(1 group)
0
Total Company Participation 310 276 284
© 2012 GS1
GLN Registries Framework
OGSM• GLN Registry Framework Pilot Project Report by March 2013
ProgressProject will develop a global solution to connect all GLN (Global Location Number) registries to enable users the look up of GLN and basic party information from any other registry• Global Index data attributes have been Agreed • Pilot Global Index development - Completed• Pilot infrastructure has been Agreed • Phase 1 Pilot, Columbia, US – Completed
• Other MOs welcome for pilot work through early December• Pilot Period / pilot activities complete by early December 2012
30
© 2012 GS1
GLN Registries Interoperability PilotPhase 1
32
Pilot Purpose: • Prove interoperability of GLN Registries model using a Global Index
Pilot Participants Profiles:• GS1 Colombia
• 14,601 items in GLN Registry• Supporting the Retail, Manufacturer, Healthcare and other 23 sectors
• GS1 US• 390,000 items in GLN Registry• Supporting the Healthcare sector• On average 68 GLN additions and 62 GLN changes daily
Pilot Criteria & Execution:• Use of existing standards; no standards development • Tested GLN attribute registration, modification, search query and response• All attributes were required to be registered and returned in GLN query
responses
© 2012 GS1
GLN Registries Phase 1 Pilot
33
Pilot Findings Phase 1:• GS1 US and GS1 Colombia executed test plan twice during pilot week• Success in proving pilot model design; can interoperate GLN Registries
using Global Index• Response times for pilot test cases within expected range
Pilot Key Learnings: Key Focus placed on searching against Global Index • Case Sensitivity will need to addressed with a broader group; should it be
on or off?– International phone number format; Organization names, street, city, country
etc.?• Data consistency is outside of the scope of this project; would be
discussed as part of the production operations of this service
Seeking additional Member Organization participation during Pilot Period
© 2012 GS1
GLN Registries Next Steps
Pilot• Execute additional pilot activity through December 2012• Prepare Pilot Report in Q1 CY 2013
Production Technology• Within the GLN Registry Group
– Determine which technical learnings will carry forward to production technical design
– Formalize discussion of technical options for inclusion of MO issued GLNs within the GLN Registry Group
Production Business Issues• Address within GLN Registry Group and escalate business decisions to
GS1 GO LT and governance• Form GLN Registry Data Quality committee to develop best practices,
education, communications and audit approach34
© 2012 GS1
MO Deployment Kits
Food Traceability
Bar Codes in Retail
Fresh Foods
Building partnerships to enable GS1 Standards Implementations
Order to Cash
Transport Management
Solution Providers
36
© 2012 GS1
Contents
37
• The MO Deployment Kits summarise the experience and best practices from GS1 MOs worldwide, including
• Market understanding• Surveys• Creating partnerships• Developing a marketing plan• Supporting users in the implementation phase• Measuring success• Marketing collateral (case studies reference documents)• Technical information• Training tools
© 2012 GS1
MO Contributors and GO Owner
MO Contributors GO Owner
O2C GS1 GER, FR, US, UK, BEL, SP, MEX, SWE, IT, NL, JP, AUS, ARG
Anders Grangard/Nora Kaci
Bar Codes in Retail GS1 FR, UK, NZ, NIGERIA, IND, COL, SLO, MALAY, US, MEX, RU, SAUDI A., CA
David Buckley
Solution Providers Programme GS1 AUS, AT, FR, GER, HUN, IRE, MEX, NOR, SA, SP, SWE, UK, US
Julio Gaset
Food Traceability GS1 ARG, BE, BR, CHI, CRO, FR, GER, HK, IRE, MEX, NZ, PERU, SA, THAI, US
Carolyn Lee
Fresh Food GS1 AT, AUS, BELUX, BR, CA, FR, IRE, KO, NL, PO, SA, UK, US
Greg Rowe
Transport Management GS1 SWE, GER, FR, NL, AUS, DK, AT, SWIT
Nora Kaci/Audrey Kramer
38
GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities:2. Become a Key Player in the Connected World (internet)
© 2012 GS1
DQ Preamble
• The attached presentation aims to address the MB and GA request to make DQ a top priority for GS1 in coming next years. Therefore, the decisions made at the GA 2012 have been strengthened
• Due to the new services (e.g. WCO, etc.) that will be based on existing GS1 registries (GEPIR, GLN MO Registries, etc.), the scope of the DQ proposal has been enlarged to include them
41
© 2012 GS1
DQ: Objective and Scope
Objective • Strive for achieving 100% data quality in all GS1 data
ScopeAs this is a major undertaking, we will approach by phases. • Data
• Internal: GEPIR and GLN• External: GDSN Data Pools and B2C Aggregators
• Attributes• Product and Party information
• Geographies• Primary focus on AC / G20 countries but open to other countries• Sectors• Consumer Goods and Healthcare
42
© 2012 GS1
DQ Internal (MOs): DQ Objective & Plan
Objective: Target 100% data quality in GEPIR and GLN Registries by end 2014Plan1. Develop Best Practices Protocol to clean and update GEPIR and GLN
Registries (GO, March 2013)2. Clean current data bases:
3. Develop Best practices to add/maintain data for GEPIR and GLN Registries (GO, June 2013)
4. Run annual DQ audits by external auditorsFundingUse Global reserves to contribute to this project with a 5% discount on 2013 annual fee (to be paid to each participant MO after successful, external audited conclusion of the project within due date)
GEPIR GLN Registries
AC/G20 Balance AC/G20 BalanceEnd 2013 Mid 2014 Mid 2014 End 2014
43
© 2012 GS1
DQ External (Users): Background
1. Multiple Data Crunch reports have shown the low quality of B2B data. The B2C research also shows similar results
2. Most Large Enterprises (LE) are not ready to deliver directly quality data to their trading partners in the next 2-3 years. This represents major changes in their internal business processes and IT systems. They provide the data through complex, inaccurate and expensive alternative systems
3. Many LEs are sharing product data using the GDSN framework, that is growing year after year in products and companies
4. Most LE manufacturers have make clear that they want to provide their data at their own pace. Most LEs (manufacturers & retailers) have clearly stated that mandates to suppliers is not the right approach to get suppliers to join a DQ project
5. However, there is also an increasing number of non-GDSN data repositories that host product data used by LEs and SMEs, primarily, to:
1. Store basic product and label information for B2C purposes2. Share Basic B2B information (weight and dimensions) for Shelf Planograms
44
© 2012 GS1
DQ External (Users): Objectives & Plan (1 of 2)
Objective: Strive for 100% data quality for B2B and B2C applications, in Consumer Goods and HC by 2015 (?)
Plan 1. Execute DQ strategy agreed at GA 2012
1. Leverage the current DQF, collateral and tools to:– Launch an aggressive awareness, education and marketing campaign to educate
MOs and key stakeholders by training 90% of TCGF Board Companies on DQF– Drive alignment of DQ, B2C, GDSN to harmonize messaging– Enhance and extend all DQ materials by refreshing DQ training, website and
collateral and case studies2. Propose DQ Measure for TCGF Global Scorecard3. Renew of the current DQ Strategy and DQF to support B2B2C (GDSN 12 / 12
OGSM)4. Ask TCGF Board and HC LT companies to provide achievable dates to deliver this
DQ objective (2015 ?)
45
© 2012 GS1
DQ External (Users): Objectives & Plan (2 of 2)
Plan (cont…)2. AC/G20 MOs to strengthen the basic plan by:
1. GDSN users: Making sure they facilitate all users access to the GDSN framework (via own Data Pool or collaboration with an existing GDSN DP)
2. Non-GDSN users: 1. Sign a strategic collaboration agreement with Non-GDSN key data repositories to
guarantee:1. Use of GS1 attributes2. Interoperability with other GS1 framework and, in the future, with the GS1 Global Data
Backbone2. Provide data repository services (Aggregator), leveraging existing Aggregators (for
simplicity and cost reasons), for all users that do not want to use the GDSN framework
3. Provide data capture & measuring services, directly or indirectly, for B2C (TSD) and B2B (Shelf Planograms) basic data
46
© 2012 GS1
DQ: Next Steps
1. AC Support to:1. DQ Internal (Internal)2. DQ External (Users)
2. Get support from Users (GDSN Board and B2C Project Board) (October 2012)
3. Get support from MB (November 2012)
47
© 2012 GS1
Agenda
• TSD Standards Status
• Global Index Implementation for TSD Framework
• TSD Aggregator Certification
• TSD Framework Naming
• Issues, suggestions & Project Board support
• Q&A
49
© 2012 GS1
TSD Standard Prototype
50
Objective:Trial TSD Standard Specification to improve the quality of the final standard.
Aggregator Participants:1Sync, epcSolutions, GS1 Colombia, GS1 France, GS1 Italy, GS1 Russia, Timing:Original completion date Sept 2012 (new date TBD by group)
© 2012 GS1
Global Index Implementation for TSD Framework
51
© 2012 GS1 1
Data Aggregator 1
Data Aggregator 2
Data Pool 2
Global Index
Internet Application 1
Additional Brand Data
3rd Party Content
Non-Brand Data
Internet Application 2
Additional Brand Data
3rd Party Content
Non-Brand Data
Data Pool 1
Aggregator-Index Query Interface (AIQI) Aggregator-Index Maintenance Interface (AIMI)
Aggregator-Aggregator Query Interface (AAQI)
GDSN TSD Framework
TSD Architecture & Framework
TSD interface standard
TSD interface standard
TSD interface standard
F-ONS(TSD phase 1)
© 2012 GS1
TSD Framework NamingSupported by Project Board
53
© 2012 GS1
Objective
• Create a global umbrella name for the Trusted Source of Data Framework
• Name will describe the framework of data aggregators providing access to digital product data
• Analogous to GS1 GDSN
GS1 GDSN Framework GS1 TSD Framework
GS1 TSD Framework
© 2012 GS1
TSD Framework Naming
55
• GS1 SOURCE
© 2012 GS1
Issues & Suggestions
56
© 2012 GS1
Issue 1 - Brands are not ready!
57
• It’s not “we don’t want to”, it’s more like “we can’t”• Brands do not have the attributes we require in a single
internal database so don’t know how to provide it• The company representatives on our boards know this
and are delaying because they don’t want to commit to something they know they can’t deliver
© 2012 GS1
Issue 2 – TSD is NOT their top priority
58
• Despite all of the market research and analysis of brand data on the internet, the project is the top priority for brands
• Our message to date has focussed on:• Protection of brand value by providing consumers with
accurate data upon which they base buying decisions – product data accuracy
• The risk of consumers not buying a product if they are using an application and the product is “not found” – product data completeness
© 2012 GS1
TSD Actions – Proposed to B2C PB
59
1. MO’s - Ask board members when they will be in a position to populate the TSD service on a sustainable basis and local MOs to benchmark what the companies are currently doing to support B2C requirements of IAPs Supported by Project Board
2. MO’s – Ask retailer members who have an existing GDSN mandate with supplier in force, whether they would be willing to extend the mandate for their pre-packaged food and beverage suppliers asking them to fill in the 19 nutritional attributes currently supported by their Data Pool by June 2013 NOT Supported by Project Board
3. MOs - Ask for a mandate from retailers that suppliers send a physical sample of every new or modified product to the MO or a 3rd party for data collection before they will list it
NOT Supported by Project Board
© 2012 GS1
TSD Actions – Proposed to B2C PB
60
4. GO & MOs - Utilise the “EU One-Pager” to show that the GS1 TSD is the easiest and most cost effective solution for brands to comply with the upcoming EU legislation and use this as a tool to get them to provide data
Supported by Project Board but NOT as a mandate for adoption
5. GO – organise and help finance a “business pilot” with those Aggregators who have a critical mass of data in advance of the EU Regulation coming into force
Supported by Project Board
© 2012 GS1
Next Steps
61
1. Participating MOs to contact their board members and ask:• When they will be in a position to populate the TSD data in
their country on a sustainable basis• What they are currently doing to support the B2C demands of
IAPs (mobile apps and internet sites)
2. Participating MOs to circulate the EU Legal Impact Assessment and the one-pager to all relevant members to try to raise the awareness and priority of the project
3. GO to draft a project plan for the “business pilot” with Aggregators that feel they will have a critical mass of data available. Plan to be completed by end of 2012.
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit : The Problem
63
• Anti-counterfeiting impacts:• Economy
– Anti-counterfeit trade estimated to reach USD $1.77 trillion by 2015– G20 member countries lose USD $77.5 billion in tax revenues and
incur an additional USD $25 billion increased cost of crime– An estimated 2.5 million jobs have been lost, increasing the annual
cost of welfare payments• Public Health
– Fake tuberculosis and malaria drugs alone are estimated to kill 700,000 people a year
– G20 member countries are reporting 3,000 deaths p.a. due to counterfeits
• National Security– counterfeit electronic components in military and defence equipment
pose a national security risk
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit – Identified GS1 risks
64
Risk to GS1 Core Analysis
Solution providers extending their authentication solutions to include object identity (GTIN role) and track and trace
Multiple solution providers exists and a lack of awareness of GS1 is leading to alternate strategies when GS1 could form core solution
Solution providers comparing anti-counterfeit measures (serialization and secure labels) with a standard GS1 barcode and packaging label
Lack of awareness of GS1 among some big players leading to alternate strategies
Food industry assigning additional code for authentication and track and trace (HarvestMark example)
GS1 losing out on greater role in authentication and traceability of food - growing in other sectors
ISO anti-counterfeit group focused on interoperability of multiple services & solutions
Multiple solution providers pushing various methods. GS1’s big pharma not happy with developments – and working with GO on interventions
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit – Strategy
65
Recommendations What Examples
Short Term Engage with anti-counterfeiting solution providers and leverage the use of GS1 keys and services in their solution
• WCO IPM • SMS services e.g. for
Pharma
Medium Term Leverage the EPCIS network and the rest of the GS1 system as core infrastructure requirements
• Hong Kong Consumer Connect using EPCIS
• EPFIA model using DataMatrix
Long Term Remain active in key standards associations to ensure that the solutions they publish are compliant with GS1 standards
• ISO anti-counterfeit group
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit : Short-term
66
• Expand and support current work with WCO • Currently:
• Brand-owners (over 400, mainly multi-nationals)o Provide details of the anti-counterfeit measures used on their products to
an IPM database used by the IPM tool• WCO
o Augment the product information with examples/pictures of detected counterfeit products in circulation
– National customs authorities (currently 40)– Search manually in IPM by entering free text on brand and/or product
• Objective:• Establish GS1 as a core infrastructure requirement – use the
GTIN as the product key• Utilise GEPIR + future possibility of ONS, GDSN & TSD
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit : Short-term
67
• Produce a compendium of Solution Providers operating anti-counterfeit services by region and provide to MOs (together with GS1 benefit case) for local engagement and education.
• Cell phone carriers & Solution providers produce numerous SMS services, particularly in Africa:• Airtel & U.S. tech company Sproxil partner to provide a Mobile
Product Authentication™ (MPA™) service. mPedigree have a similar system
– A scratch-off label is placed on products by the manufacturer or importer and the code registered in a database
– When consumers purchase a product they scratch off the label to reveal the unique code
– The code is then keyed in by the consumer, sent via SMS and the consumer receives a reply indicating whether the product is genuine
© 2012 GS1
Examples of SMS services in Africa
68
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit : Medium-term
69
• Develop and publish integrated solutions with key GS1 members e.g. EU pharma strategy with EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry & Associations) model
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit : Medium-term
70
• Investigate adapting and expanding GS1 HK solution for product authentication using only GS1 keys• Demonstrates integrated solutions with multiple solution providers• Showcases EPCIS role in Anti-Counterfeit
Manufacturer/Packer Distributor/Retailer
Customer
Labelling Ship out Sales
Customer
GS1 HK – PA Solution
Secure Label Provider
Serial label printing
Print Order
Brand Owner
Reports
?
Secure label printing
Authentication QueryEPC Event 2 EPC Event 3EPC Event 1
SMS Web
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit : Long-Term
71
• Continue work with ISO anti-counterfeit group to ensure that their draft functional model for interoperable object identification and authentication services has GS1 standards/services aligned to the process steps
© 2012 GS1
Anti-Counterfeit – Issues
72
• Review of EPCIS standards to ensure that they fully supports the requirements of mass serialisation e.g. How should we handle Batch/Lot number versus SKU (work already initiated)
• Proliferation of the use of holograms in various countries, particularly on pharmaceutical products
75
T&L - Objective
The Objective of GS1 regarding Transport and Logistics (T&L) is to improve efficiency and visibility of the T&L operations of supply chain stakeholders through the use of GS1 Global Standards
76
GS1 T&L – Key Goals
1. Adoption of Logistics Identifiers2. Adoption of LIM EDI Messages3. Adoption of Visibility Standards4. Increase Membership through relevant
External Relations activities
77
GS1 T&L 11/12 Update
1. Strategy approved2. Transport messages ratified3. Transport Management Deployment Kit including
Implementation guideline delivered4. GS1 T&L MO Interest Group strengthened 5. GS1 Id Keys in T&L position paper ready for GSMP
review6. Customs Engagement Starter Kit delivered7. GS1 T&L Online containing engagement support tools
for MOs launched8. Marketing tools delivered
Example: GS1 T&L online
78
• Overview• Presentation
• Steps for engagement • How to get Started• Talking Points• Customs Engagement Kit
• Standards• GS1 eCom (XML & EANCOM)
Transport & Logistics messages
• Logistics Interoperability Modal (LIM)
• Standard International Logistics Label (STILL)
Full content: http://online.gs1.org/index.php/transport_and_logistics/
• Marketing Tools• GS1 Marketing Framework• Value proposition• Case studies• Brochures
• Training & Implementation Tools• Introduction to GS1 T&L • SSCC Video• Relevant Standards
See more details in Appendix
GS1 eSeal
Objective• GS1 eSeal Implementation Guideline - MB decision to move forward by
November 2012
Status• Statement of Business Need developed• Call to Action launched
Issues• No User community support
Next Steps• Cancel GS1 eSeal project
79
OGSM Measure FY12/13 Status
MB decision to move forward by November 2012 On Nov. MB Agenda
Collaboration with WCO
80
• GS1 has a long-time working relationship with the WCO since both organisations are committed to enabling a secure, efficient global supply chain
• In 2007, a MoU between GS1 and WCO was signed in recognition of the wide range of business interest shared by our organisations.
• Cooperation Agreement between GS1 & WCO signed 4th Sep 2012 addressing the integration of the GS1 System into Interface Public-Members (IPM) Anti-Counterfeiting tool
WCO IPM Opportunity
The GS1 System enhances Customs ability to accurately identify unsafe and/or counterfeit goods.
• Interface Public-Members (IPM) is a secured permanent training and communication tool for the fight against counterfeiting and piracy
• IPM is a cornerstone tool in the WCO’s anti-counterfeiting strategy
• Integration of the GS1 System into the WCO’s IPM Anti-counterfeiting tool
• Automated access to additional product categories through GS1 Keys
More information in separate deck on GS1 – WCO IPM Cooperation81
Fresh Foods Solutions
Objective• Fresh Foods Integrated Guide published by June 2013 • Train 5 MOs on Fresh Foods Deployment Kit
Progress• Statement of Business Need and Work Request completed for Fruit &
Vegetable Master Data Guideline and GTIN Rules enhancements• GS1 in Europe Training on Deployment Kit 24-25 Sep in Oslo
Issues• None
Next Steps• Fruit & Vegetable Master Data Guideline and GTIN Rules to Public Review
by Dec 2012 • Regional requirements and priorities for Meat, Poultry, and Seafood identified
by Feb 2013 (industry input to FY 2013-14 Business Plan) 83
OGSM Measure FY12/13 Status
Fresh Foods Integrated Guide published by June 2013 On target
Deployment in 5 MOs by June 2013 On target
© 2011 GS1
Financial Services Update
• As an output from the G20 Leaders Summit approval of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Expert report which highlights a federated model, the FSB has commissioned a Private Sector Preparatory Group (PSPG) • Provide active co-ordination and collaboration between the public
and private sectors in implementing the global LEI. • GS1 contributions areas will include governance, operations, and
funding.• GS1 holds 5 member seats in this group with an additional 5 seats
being held by TCGF companies. • The PSPG held an initial meeting on 25 July.
85
© 2011 GS1
Financial Services Update (2)
• PSPG Members – MOs and member companies• GS1 Global Office – Ken Traub• GS1 Germany –Christian Przybilla• GS1 India – Ravi Mathur• GS1 Mexico – Juan Manuel Calderón Alvarado • GS1 UK - Laura Waters• Tim Smucker - J M Smucker Company• Ben Johnson – J M Smucker Company• Chris Nolan - The Coca-Cola Company• Mike Yorwerth - Tesco • Mona Chugh - Nestle
86
© 2011 GS1
Financial Services Update (3)
• Next steps• Next PSPG physical meeting is scheduled to be held on 15-16
October in Basel. • FSB is striving towards a recommendation in March 2013
• ROC to be formed and the COU BOD named. COU BOD that will be making decisions about who does what.
• GS1 MO’s providing insight and assistance efforts to educate local governments and industry stakeholders on how GS1 could play a role to help.
• GS1 “What If” team continues work to determine how we would respond should the FSB ask GS1 to fulfill one or more roles in the proposed global LEI solution.
• Situation remains fluid; not clear how/if consensus will be reached• Recommendation that GS1 should continue to be involved on a
measured basis.
87
GA 2013 & GS1 40th AnniversaryCelebrating 40 years as the global language of business
2013 GENERAL ASSEMBLY
KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE 2013 GA
• How can the annual General Assembly become a catalyst for the GS1 organization to become better prepared for the future?
• How can the agenda evolve to create a compelling program with innovative speakers in key areas critical to GS1’s future?
• How does the GA help position GS1 as a global thought leader that attracts C suite executives for enrichment and dialog?
• How does the GS1 40th Anniversary help frame GS1’s role as an organization that has been critical to and will be vital for, the future successes of businesses and industries in the next 40 years?
91
CASE FOR CHANGE
• GS1 is at a critical time in its history• There is tremendous change happening for its
global membership• Economic, Competitive, Regulatory, Customer &
Consumer• Technology, Data Integrity, Mobility• Disruptive Influences
92
THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY PROVIDES THE PERFECT OPPORTUNITY FOR GS1 TO SET THE STAGE FOR WHAT
IT CAN ACHIEVE IN THE NEXT 40 YEARS
93
CASE FOR CHANGE
• How does GS1 succeed in the next 40 years?
94
Business has become global creating an
even greater need for GS1 Standards to be the
common language for business.
New markets offer opportunity and the need
for GS1 Standards ensure that future marketplaces
will continue to thrive wherever they exist.
In a fast moving world where change is constant, leadership will be critical to remain relevant.
Business and industry will continue to change through innovation making it necessary for GS1 to evolve with its customers.
INNOVATION
LEADERSHIP EMERGING OPPORTUNITY
GLOBALIZATION
INTERDEPENDENCY
GS1 Standards enable business and industry to seamlessly move and source products and services around the world. Global commerce will
continue to rely on GS1 Standards, and GS1 Member Organizations need to work together as one to move business and industry forward.
CASE FOR CHANGE
ONE VOICE• Beginning in May 2013 through all of 2014, GS1 can leverage its rich
history to build awareness and on its first credibility for its future. • The 40th Anniversary offers the opportunity to be the milestone that is
leveraged to re-establish GS1’s relevance globally.• Maximizing the 40th Anniversary opportunity will require a unified
effort for GS1 as a whole (Global Office + MO’s) to “speak with one voice”.
THE NEXT 40 YEARS• GS1 Member Organizations need to work together as one to move
business and industry forward.
95
STRUCTURE CHANGE TO GA AGENDA
GOAL: To provide an engaging and thought-provoking program for GS1 MO’s and C suite guests and attendees.
HOW:• Dynamic keynote speakers to focus on Innovation, Globalization, Leadership,
Emerging Markets and Interdependency rounding out the importance of these company priorities.
• Optional, off-site field trips to view/tour distribution centers, headquarters, and manufacturing plants of top nearby companies
96
ENHANCED AGENDA AT A GLANCE
Board Committee for Standards Meeting
Optional Group Field Trip: Macy’s Distribution Center
Opening Plenary
Guest Speaker: Sir Ken Robinson(topic: innovation)
Guest Speaker: Noreena HertzGS1 Panel: US, EU, China(topic: globalization/economy)
97
General Assembly: Official Business
Optional Group Field Trip:Bloomingdale’s Retail visitbefore opening to showcaseRFID item level tagging
Mor
ning
Afte
rnoo
n
Welcome Reception Cocktail
Joint Boards Dinner
Management Board Meeting
Optional Group Field Trip: McKeeson hosted visit to a pharmaceutical or healthcare center
Presidents / CEOs Session
Gala Dinner
Guest Speaker: Marshall Goldsmith(topic: leadership)
Guest Speaker: Gary KovacsPanel: GS1 US Emerging Markets Reps(topic: Emerging Digital World)
Keynote Speaker: Muhtar KentPresident & CEO, Coca-Cola
Optional Networking Dinner
MO Recognition &Closing Plenary
Optional Hollywood Tour
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY
Eve
ning
GA 2013
© 2012 GS1
• In 1973 industry leaders selected a single standard for product identification, known today as the GS1 bar code
• Today, the GS1 System of standards provides unique identification that can be used anywhere in the world. Key benefits for the business include better visibility, efficiency, and security
HIGH-LEVEL PITCH
99
© 2012 GS1
CAMPAIGN OBJECTIVE
The 40th Anniversary provides the perfect opportunity for GS1 to set the stage for what it can achieve in the next 40 years
• Use and leverage this historical milestone to develop and launch a 1-year global marketing campaign:
• Step-change GS1 brand awareness
• Underline the benefits of using our standards and solutions
• Target:
• C-levels and supply chain experts from companies in our core and new sectors
• Media / Focused press (locally)
100
© 2012 GS1
CAMPAIGN STRATEGY• Build and deploy a Global Marketing & PR plan to be leveraged in
all MOs
• Marketing Kit (anniversary logo and web animation, corporate presentation, promotional micro-website videos, users’ testimonials, merchandising, email signature, digital templates and artwork, etc)
• PR kit (impactful messaging, PR dissemination guidelines and recommendations, high-level pitch, storylines, B-roll, talking points, FAQs, etc)
• Create opportunities to get Board Members companies involved and support the campaign (high level users testimonials videos, ad…)
• Global campaign virtual kick-off on Apr 3rd, 2013
• Kick-off worldwide celebrations at the GA 2013 (20-23 May in LA) 101
© 2012 GS1
40TH ANNIVERSARY MERCHANDISE
102
ConceptMerchandise that celebrates the barcodeand 40th Anniversary
OverviewExpand brand awareness and create an emotional connection with the GS1 brand by applying the barcode, barcode designs, and anniversary logo to merchandise for expanded brand awareness.
Examples include apparel, iPod cover, backpacks, etc.
NOTE: Universal Site of ‘basic’ merchandising items (pens, mug, candles, t-shirts, etc) for all MO’s or individual MO’s can use the artwork to produce and sell their own items
© 2012 GS1
ARTIST COMPETITION & AUCTION
103
ConceptArt that is created using the barcode
OverviewHave artists from around the world consider the impact of the barcode on their culture and entertheir interpretation in a competition. Create a digital collection of all entries for MO websitesand customers, and to share with potential MOs.
This would not only celebrate the barcodeitself, but also connect GS1 with a greater cause thatmatters to GS1 and its customers.
NOTE: This idea has options. It can be a traveling art show around the globe, or a localized contest. The winner from each MOs country could then compete globally. This will be a great tool to generate PR and media interest.
© 2012 GS1
LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD
104
ConceptAn award that recognizes and commemorates individual(s) that have made very significant contributions to GS1. This could be a scalable concept that could be made on both the global and MO level.
OverviewWe are celebrating the UPC barcode's great achievements because of those who had the vision and fortitude to pave the way and make it happen. On behalf of GS1, this award will be presented to those (external contributor) who've made a difference in the world of standards.
Recipients will be nominated based on deserved criteria. This award can be given out annually at the GA.
© 2012 GS1
ConceptGoogle’s name designed with icons/drawingsthat allude to the anniversary, celebration ofthe barcode, and GS1
OverviewGoogle has a global presence and known for creating a “doodle” or series of images thatcelebrates important events. Google has done a barcode for a previous anniversary; we could have them celebrate the 40th Anniversary in a new way that would enhance the GS1 brand and celebrate connectivity on a global platform.
• We could possibly do series of doodles over several days that reference theartist competition and auction.
GOOGLE DOODLE
105
© 2012 GS1
HISTORICAL TIMELINE
106
ConceptTimeline that shows when each MO firstscanned a barcode and what product it wasthat had the barcode
OverviewThe barcode has a rich history; each countryadopted standards at different times and withdifferent products. A visual representation ofthe timeline of the 111 first scans (productsand dates) in each country could illustratethe global reach, and depth and breadthof the barcode’s role over the last 40 years.
© 2012 GS1
BARCODE SHORT VIDEO
107
ConceptExciting video to have available on the website, media kit, YouTube, opening etcs,What would the world and supermarkets be without barcodes?
OverviewThe invention of the Universal Product Code (U.P.C.) barcode nearly 40 years ago fundamentally changed our world. Created to speed grocery store check out and improve inventory management, the U.P.C. laid the foundation for a technological revolution that started with a simple barcode.This short video will highlight the ways in which barcoding has impacted business and our world (and vice versa)—and look to thefuture with great optimism.
© 2012 GS1
CUSTOMER SUPPORTED ADS
108
OverviewDue to the profound impact that the barcode has had, the opportunity exists to leverage the anniversary to build awareness. This could come in the form of having companies acknowledge the impact that GS1 has had over the years. Considerations could include strategically placed advertising that is sponsored by member companies as well as creating a compelling business story that can be released to key media outlets.
• Full-page ad in a significant newspaper or magazine that is supported by key companies that are participating
© 2012 GS1
MO MARKETING TOOLKIT
109
ConceptCreate a kit for international use that MOs can easily adapt for use in local markets
OverviewWe will create a complete kit that MOs can take, alter as needed, and release through local outlets. MOs can use all of the following or only select pieces, as appropriate for their markets:• Anniversary logo
• Full-page ad where MOs can insert their country-specific copy/graphic
• Celebration ‘footage/testimonials’ edited story for media outlets. This could be the inspirational video
• Digital assets: flash animation for each MO website, newsletter header, email signoff template
• PPT about the anniversary and GS1 milestones (for Board to use, etc.) that MOs can translate
• Promotional web site (explained in following slide)
© 2012 GS1
PROMOTIONAL SITE
110
ConceptA microsite dedicated to the celebration of the barcode for each MO (as a part of the Marketing Toolkit)
OverviewHave one hub of information about the anniversary with interesting resources and history about the barcode and its impact throughout the world. Examples of content could be information about GS1, a history, global and local press, barcode counter, an inspirational video, and barcode merchandise. Create a button or banner for MOs to put on their websites that lead to the promotional sites.
Counter of ScansConceptA counter that records each scan acrossthe globe in real-time within each promo site
© 2012 GS1
LOCAL SPECIFIC MARKETING
111
Easily duplicated ideas for events & advertising• Car-wraps • Billboards • Floor graphics
© 2012 GS1
OTHER LOCAL EXAMPLES
112
GS1 TriviaConceptA game where people are tested on their barcode and GS1 knowledge
OverviewCreate a game that has players ask each other questions on the 40 year history, GS1,and use of the barcode and standards around the world.
International CollectionConceptA basket of products that were first scanned
OverviewCreate a basket of products that were first scanned atcheckout. Different baskets could be created throughoutthe year to commemorate categories of productsor industries. This is an idea that can be customized per country for a localized marketing effort.
© 2012 GS1
MO PR TOOLBOX
113
ConceptThe PR toolbox will consist of a kit for international use that MOs can easily adapt for use in local markets
Each GS1 office will have access to the toolbox to implement a local public relations campaign to raise GS1’s brand awareness.
The tool box will consist of:
• PR Guidelines (how to respond to media inquiries, how to pitch stories to print, broadcast and online media, how to organize a media event)
• 12 Press releases that will contain the global PR theme and key messages that local MOs can use in their markets
• Image Library
• Talking Points
• Frequently Asked Questions (media perspective)
• Celebration ‘B Roll’ edited story for broadcast media
© 2012 GS1
CAMPAIGN TIMELINE (1)
Aug 22, 2012
Marketing Network Webinar• Share PR and
Marketing plan• Get MOs
input
Sep 25-27, 2012
AC Meeting• Share
Anniversary plan• Get AC support• Create Project
Plan Execution Team
PR Kit distribution to MOs:• Usage guidelines• Catchy campaign theme
and key messages• Press kit & Media Guide• Talking points• 12 press releases• FAQs
Marketing Kit distribution to MOs:• Anniversary artworks• Logo (image + animation)• Material and collaterals
(video, corporate presentation, historical timeline, merchandising, etc)
2012
MB Meeting• Share
Anniversary plan• Get MB
companies support
Inform ALL MOs• Share campaign
timeline and Guidelines
Nov 6-8, 2012
2013
Jan, 2013
Feb 18-22, 2013
Dedicated workshops at the Global Forum
114
© 2012 GS1
20142013
CAMPAIGN TIMELINE (2)
Apr 3, 2013
PR global and local campaign Launch• Google Doodle Day 1 (barcode
artwork)• Local kick-off events and
activities• Global + Local press release (1)
May 20-23, 2013
GS1 community Anniversary celebrations at the GA• Video testimonials• Festive activities• Commemorative gift• Awards…
Jun 26, 2014
End of the 1-year campaign• Celebrating the
first product scanned in a store (Ohio)
Share campaign results and celebrate achievements at the Global Forum
Feb, 2014
Ongoing MO events and PR activities
115
© 2012 GS1
Confirmed MOs with local activities
• GS1 Austria• GS1 Australia• GS1 BelgiLux• GS1 Canada• GS1 China• GS1 Colombia• GS1 Costa Rica• GS1 Croatia• GS1 Denmark• GS1 Egypt• GS1 Finland• GS1 France• GS1 HK
• GS1 India• GS1 Italy• GS1 Ireland• GS1 Mexico• GS1 Sweden• GS1 UK• GS1 US
• Other TBC• Other TBC
Organisations in orange confirmed their participation in the Project Team116
© 2012 GS1
40th Anniversary
117
• Preliminary US Campaign Plan• Commemorative Brand – Work in Progress
© 2012 GS1
Cap Gemini-GS1-TCGF strategic research
• Objective: Perform a GS1/TCGF/CG strategic research study aimed at identifying requirements for supply chain standards and services
• Target: 50 C-level executives (CEOs or Chief Supply Chain Officers, CIOs, CMOs, etc.) , of TCGF Board companies designated by the CEOs
• Process:1. TCGF invited their Board members to participate 2. Interviews in June, July, August3. Research Report in October4. Presentation to TCGF board (Jose Lopez) in November
• Costs: €75K paid by GS1
• Report: Sponsored by GS1, TCGF and Cap Gemini (including logos)
119
© 2012 GS1
Initial Findings
120
Tomorrow’s standards will need to support: • Consumer demand for product information
• Extension of supply chain data to B2C
• Consumer safety (especially for food products)• Providing information on origin and ingredients• Ensuring contamination does not occur• Being able to recall products quickly and easily
• Sustainability• Growing pressure from governments, NGOs and consumers• Consumers want to be able to compare and contrast the sustainability measures for
products from different companies
• Full visibility from production to shelf• Faster and more open access to point-of-sale (POS) data• Closing the visibility gap the last 50 yards – especially to minimize out of stock
• Supply Chain Efficiency• Pockets of waste can still be eliminated across the value chain by working collaboratively
e.g. less-than-truckload (LTL) shipments/empty trucks, excess inventory
© 2012 GS1
Leveraging the report
121
• Leveraging the Report• The research report will be presented to TCGF and GS1 Board
members in November 2012• Marketing material will be developed for MOs
– One-page flyer– Press release– PPT and talking points– Video from Capgemini
• Articles in GO newsletters• Webinar for MOs with Capgemini
© 2012 GS1123
McKinsey White Paper Project Timelines
• Completed data request
• Key findings from industry data gathering
• White Paper directed to C-suite audience on benefits of global standards adoption in Healthcare
• Deliverables
= Today
• Launch data collection with industry participants
• Collect templates and analyze results
• Launch data analysis• Launch development
of public health case• Launch business case
quantification
Review work completed to-date Conduct interviews of senior
executives across industry Develop data request templates Assess potential for building
business case with existing data Conduct additional analytics if
necessary Develop case studies of
successful global standards implementations
• Verify collected data if possible
• Complete development of public health case
• Complete quantification of business case
• Develop communication for senior executives
• Develop high-level roadmap for industry adoption
• Assess mechanisms for increasing adoption
• Assessment of work completed to-date
• Summary of interview findings• Data request templates
CONFIDENTIAL
© 2012 GS1
McKinsey White Paper Communication Plan
124
Marketing Tools for MOs
• White Paper Brochure (full document)
• Collateral: White Paper leaflet (2 pager summary)
• Talking points for MOs to be issued prior to GS1 healthcare conference
• PPT for oral presentations• Short version for presentations• Long version for training
• Video of stakeholders and McKinsey
Communication Channels
• White Paper to be released to Tier 1 media by McKinsey
• White paper published on McKinsey and GS1 websites
• White Paper integrated in GS1 & McKinsey Newsletters
• Global Webinar to be presented by McKinsey for MOs and users
• MOs Roadshows with McKinsey speakers and healthcare stakeholders as available
© 2012 GS1
Global Standards in Healthcare White Paper by McKinsey – Communication Plan Timeline
125
• Finalisation White Paper by McKinsey
• Mktg MO Expert group created
• Marketing Toolkit aligned
• Interview Katy George (McKinsey) – teaser prior to Conference
• MOs to identify Tier 1 newspapers and select trade and local media for McKinsey outreach
Aug-Oct 12 Nov 12-Jan 13 Feb 13-onwards
• 24 Oct:– White Paper Brochure
available for MOs– 2 Pager Flyer of WP– PPT short version available
• Publication White Paper and online promotion of WP on GS1 and McKinsey websites & newsletters
• Global Forum presentation by McKinsey to promote White Paper
• GO to Train MOs on content of White Paper (long version PPT)
• Stakeholder’s video
• Local Roadshows by McKinsey for MOs.
23 October
© 2012 GS1
31 Local Healthcare user groups driving adoption of GS1 standards worldwide
• Morocco• Netherlands• New Zealand• Portugal• Russia• Serbia & Montenegro• Singapore• Slovenia• Spain• Sweden• Switzerland• Taiwan• Thailand• UK• US
126
• Australia• Austria• Belgium and Luxemburg• Brasil• Canada• Colombia• Denmark• France• Germany• Italy• Japan• Jordan• Macedonia• Malaysia
Missing AC MOs
• China• Croatia• Hong Kong• India• Mexico• Poland
GS1 Key 5 Top Priorities:5. Continue Developing a World Class, Interdependent Organization
© 2012 GS1
Governance: Actions to date: Summary
130
Actions: All MOs with issues contacted (except those that are part of the
government) Focused on 7 priority MOs + Singapore Several MOs promised changes in Governance and Branding Excellent response to request to send Auditor’s letter (AL)
Status: Governance: 14 MOs with outstanding issues Branding: 9 MOs not yet fully compliant Auditor’s letter: 13 MOs still need to send their letter
© 2012 GS1
Governance Update
131
• Overall, progress has been positive - see before.
• Several issues have however appeared when asking for changes in Governance in organisations which are not independent (e.g. part of Chamber):
• Separate legal entity created but owned by the mother organisation• User Board created but without decision power• User Board created with non GS1 users - members of the mother organisation• Audit reports are sent but with doubts on their content (no separate
accounting)
Conclusion: GS1 current rules and regulations do not enable the ICC to enforce governance changes in these MO’s if the mother organisation is not cooperating in good faith
© 2012 GS1
Next Steps
132
• Clarify, in GS1 Statutes and Internal Regulations, the definitions and wording which leaves room for interpretation (requires GA approval)
• E.g: “Not-for-profit” = Income of MO only used to further the aims & objectives of the MO and no distribution of MO revenue/profit to members, Board members, owners and management
• E.g: “User Governed” = MO has a Management Board composed in majority of GS1 user companies (member companies) and Management Board is accountable to the users/members
• Authorize the GS1 CEO, upon request from the ICC, to request additional information from MO’s to investigate their compliance (requires MB approval)
• E.g: request additional details on the Revenues and Costs
• Propose a list of possible sanctions for the non compliant MO’s with expulsion as last resort (escalation mechanism)
© 2012 GS1
Financial Strength: Proposal
136
• ECR:• All ECR fees/revenues are excluded• ECR Membership Fees are included except if these are separate fee (i.e.
distinct from GS1 membership)
• Government revenues:• Project financing, grants, subsidies etc should be included except when this is
specifically prohibited by law or by contract• Revenues of or equivalent to membership fees / subscriptions, including
contributions to membership fees should be included
• Generally, in case of doubt about whether to include or not the revenue in its financial strength, the MO should consult with the ICC
© 2012 GS1
Financial Strength – Proposed New Definition
CURRENT / OLD DEFINITIONMO “Financial Strength” or “Gross Revenue” is defined as: All funds collected annually by the MO, including those from parent, sister or subsidiary organizations, which derive from or are received in relation to the GS1 System including the EPC System.
PROPOSED NEW DEFINITIONMO “Financial Strength” is defined as:All revenues which derive from or are received in relation to the GS1 System (i.e. GS1 standards, services and solutions) and which are earned annually by : (a) the MO itself;(b) any legal entity (hereafter the "Parent"), which holds a shareholding interest or any other form of
financial stake in the MO, including under the form of a membership, a partnership or suchlike. (c) any legal entity in which the MO (hereafter the “Daughter”) or the Parent holds a shareholding
interest or any other form of financial stake, including under the form of a membership, a partnership or suchlike. The funds of the Daughter to be included in the MO Financial Strength declaration should be in proportion to the percentage of the shareholding interest or financial stake held by the MO.
(d) any entity, with or without legal personality, under the auspices of which the MO is operating.137
GEPIR Strategy Execution
Objectives• GEPIR Strategy execution• All MOs participating in GEPIR network as part of MO Core Services
Progress• 108 of 111 MOs in GEPIR (Only 1 MOs with no commitment at this point)• Updates to GEPIR MO Support Website and content for GEPIR – Complete• GEPIR V4.0 Requirements Process / Specification Design – In Progress• Data Quality Initiative (Service Levels, Conformance, Attributes) – In Progress• Quarterly Updates of GEPIR data for Hosted MOs – Launched with ICC
Issues• None at this time
Next Steps• Finalise GEPIR V4.0 Requirements / Specification Design• Execute Quality Assessment & Completeness of GS1 MO data for use in GEPIR
142* Reference: GEPIR Network Update Document
GEPIR Statistics as of September 2012
Goal : All MOs using supported versions (2.0, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2) STATUS: 3 Remaining non-conformant MOs
(108 / 111 MOs in GEPIR)108 MOs have data available through GEPIR
63 MOs hosted at Global Office+45 MOs locally hosted+ 3 MOs not yet operating in GEPIR (Only 1 with no contact)=111 Member Organizations
7 MOs on Version 2.0 7 MOs on Version 3.094 MOs on Version 3.1 / 3.2 [63 hosted, 31 local MO]
11 MOs-V3.1 July 2009 94 MOs - V3.1/V3.2 September 2012
143