membrane separation process
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
1/118
Membrane Separation Processes
By
Dr. Nadeem Feroze
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
2/118
Introduction
• Effective product separation is very crucial to
economic operation in the process industry.
Some materials are very much difficult to separate
examples are
• Dispersed solids ( compressible or density close to
liquid phase)
•
Low molecular weight, non-volatile organics,pharmaceuticles, dissolved salts
• Biological materials
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
3/118
Introduction
• The processing of these categories of materials hasbecome important
• Newer biotechnological industries
• Sophisticated nature of processing in food industries
• Nature has the answer
•
Highly effective
• Energy efficient though slow in process terms
• Nature separates biologically active materials by meansof membranes
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
4/118
• Membranes are defined as ‘‘ an interphaseseparating two phases and selectively
controlling the transport of materials between
those phases‘‘
• A membrane is an interphase rather than
interface because it occupies it a finite,
though normally small, element of space.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
5/118
• Human beings are surrounded by membranes
Skin
Kidney
Liver
• Membranes control the separation ofmaterials at all levels of life, down to the outer
layers of bacteria and subcellular components.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
6/118
• Synthetic membranes have been developed
for conventially difficult separations.
• It offers advantage of ambient temperature
operation, relatively low capital and runningcosts, modular construction.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
7/118
Classification of Membrane Processes
• Industrial membrane processes may be classified according to the
size range of materials which they are to separate and the driving
force used in separation.
• Discussion will be concerned with pressure driven processes
Microfiltration
Ultrafiltration
Nanofiltration
Reverse Osmosis
• These are already well established large scale industrial processes.
• RO is a widely used separation process.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
8/118
Classification of Membrane Separation Processes for
Liquid Systems
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
9/118
Nature of Synthetic Membranes
• Membranes used for pressure driven separationprocesses are most commonly made of polymericmaterials.
• Initially most membranes were cellulosic in naturebut are now replaced by advance polymers such aspolyamide, polysulphone, polycarbonate.
• These synthetic polymers have better resistance tomicrobial degradation and improved Chemicalstability
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
10/118
Membrane development process
a) Polymer is dissolved in a solvent 10-30 percentby mass
b) Resulting solution is cast on a suitable support
as a film of thickness 100 micrometer
c) Film is quenched by immersion in a non-solventbath, typically water or non aqueous solution
d) Resulting membrane is annealed by heating
This process is known as immersion precipitation
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
11/118
Contd ….
• The ultimate membrane structure results as acombination of phase separation and masstransfer, variation of the production
conditions giving membranes with differentseparation characteristics.
•
Most microfiltration membranes have asymmetric pore structure, and they can have aporosity as high as 80 per cent.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
12/118
• Ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membranes have an
asymmetric structure comprising a 1 –2 μm thick top layer offinest pore size supported by a ∼100 μm thick more openly
porous matrix, as shown in Figure.
• Such an asymmetric structure is essential if reasonable
membrane permeation rates are to be obtained
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
13/118
• Another important type of polymeric membrane is
the Thin-film Composite membrane.
• This consists of an extremely thin layer, typically
∼1 μm, of finest pore structure deposited on amore openly porous matrix. The thin layer is
formed by phase inversion or interfacialpolymerization on to an existing microporous
structure.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
14/118
Inorganic Membranes
• Recent advancement has been the development of
Microfiltration and Ultrafiltration membranes
composed of inorganic oxide materials presently
produced by two main techniques
1. Depositon of collodial metal oxide on to a
supporting material such as carbon
2. Puerly ceramic materials by high temperature
sintering of spray dried oxide microspheres.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
15/118
Advantages of inorganic membranes
• Higher temperature stability
• Steam sterilisation
• Increased resistance o fouling
• Narrow pore size distribution
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
16/118
• A parameter often quoted in manufacturer’s literature isthe nominal molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of amembrane.
• This is based on studies of how solute molecules arerejected by membranes.
• A solute will pass through a membrane if it is sufficientlysmall to pass through a pore, if it does not significantlyinteract with the membrane and if it does not interactwith other, larger solutes
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
17/118
• It is possible to define a solute rejection
coefficient R by:
R = 1 - (Cp/Cf )
• Cf = concentration of solute in the feed stream• Cp = concentration of solute in permeate
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
18/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
19/118
General Membrane Equation
• The general membrane equation is an attempt to state the
factors which may be important in determining the
membrane permeation rate for pressure driven processes
Where
J is the membrane flux∗, expressed as volumetric rate per unit area
|P| is the pressure difference applied across the membrane.
is the difference in osmotic pressure across the membrane
Rm is the resistance of the membrane
Rc is the resistance of layers deposited on the membrane, the filter cake and gel foulants.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
20/118
Membrane Modules
• In industry the equipment for MF, UF, and RO is
applied in form of modules
•
Membrane area is in the range of 1-20 m2
• Modules can be connected in parallel or in series
• Commonly used modules are
Tubular
Flat sheet
Spiral wound
Hollow fibre
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
21/118
Tubular modules
• Used in turbulent flow regime
• Concentration of high solids content feed
• Membrane is cast on the inside of a porous support whichis often housed in a perforated stainless steel pipe
• Individual modules contain a cluster of tubes in series heldwith in a stainless steel permeate
• Diameter in 10-25 mm , 1-6 m length
• Feed is pumped through the tubes with Reynold Numbergreater than 10,000
• Can be easily cleaned
• Main disadvantages are the relatively low membranesurface area and higher volumeric hold up
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
22/118
Flat sheet modules
• Similar to conventional filterpresses
• Consists of annular membranediscs of outer diameter 0.3 m
• Suitable for laminar flow• A single module contains 19 m2
of membrane area
• Permeate is collected from eachmembrane so that damaged
membranes can be easilyidentified
• Replacement of membranerequires dismantling of thewhole stack
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
23/118
Spiral-wound modules
• Consist of several flat membranesseparated by turbulence-promotingmesh separators and formed into aSwiss roll
• This produces a cylindrical modulewhich can be installed within a
pressure tube.
• Feed enters at one end of thepressure tube and encounters anumber of narrow, parallel feedchannels formed between adjacentsheets of membrane.
• Permeate spirals towards theperforated central tube forcollection.
• Up to six such modules may beinstalled in series in a single pressuretube.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
24/118
Hollow-fibre modules
• Consist of bundles of finefibres, 0.1 –2.0 mm indiameter, sealed in a tube.
• For desalination
applications, feed flow isusually around the outsideof the unsupported fibreswith permeation radiallyinward.
• Capable of high pressureoperation
• Readily fouled and difficultto clean
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
25/118
Plant Configuration
• Membrane modules can be configured in various
ways to produce a plant of the required separation
capability.
• A simple batch recirculation system arrangement is
most suitable for small-scale batch operation.
• Larger scale plants will operate either as feed and
bleed or continuous single-pass operations
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
26/118
Feed and bleed
• Retentate is initially totally recycled
• When the required solute concentration is reached within the loop, a fraction ofthe loop is continuously bled off.
•The main advantage is that the final concentration is then continuously available asfeed is pumped into the loop.
• The main disadvantage is that flux is lower than the average flux in the batch mode,with a correspondingly higher membrane area requirement.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
27/118
Feed and bleed
• Large-scale plants usually use multiple stages operated in series to overcome thelow-flux disadvantage of the feed and bleed operation.
• Only the final stage is operating at the highest concentration and lowest flux,while the other stages are operating at lower concentrations with higher flux.
• Thus, the total membrane area is less than that required for a single-stageoperation.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
28/118
Continuous single pass
• Concentration of the feed stream increases gradually along the length ofseveral stages of membrane modules arranged in series.
• The feed only reaches its final concentration at the last stage.
• There is no recycle and the system has a low residence time.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
29/118
Reverse Osmosis
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
30/118
Introduction
• When miscible solutions of different concentration are
separated by a membrane that is permeable to the
solvent but nearly impermeable to the solute, diffusion
of the solvent occurs from less concentrated to the more
concentrated solution, where solvent activity is lower.
• The diffusion of solvent is called Osmosis.
• Osmotic transfer of water occurs in many plant and
animal cells
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
31/118
Introduction
• The transfer of solvent can be stopped by increasing the
pressure of the concentrated solution until the activity of
solvent is same on both sides of the membrane.
• If pure solvent is on one side of the membrane, the
pressure required to equalize solvent activities is the
osmotic pressure of the solution.
• If pressure higher than the osmotic pressure is applied,
solvent will diffuse from concentrated solution to dilute
solution. This Phenomenon is called Reverse Osmosis
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
32/118
Osmosis and Reverse Osmosis Illustration
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
33/118
Basic Terminology
•Feed water: Supply water that is fed into the RO system to betreated
• Permeate: A portion of the feed water that passes through a seriesof membranes and is returned as purified water.
• Concentrate: A portion of the feed water that is rejected by themembrane and contains the solution of impurities that have beenfiltered out of the permeate.
• Water flux: The rate of permeate production typically expressed asthe rate of water flow per unit area of membrane (e.g., gallons persquare foot per day)
• Recovery rate: The ratio of permeate flow to feed water flow, whichindicates the overall water efficiency of the system
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
34/118
Basic Information
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
35/118
RO Membrane Properties
• More than 50% of RO modules use cellulose acetate
membrane.
• It has high permeability for water and low permeability for
dissolved salts.
• Its limitation are:I. Smaller allowable pH range of 4.5-7.5 (beyond this range, cellulose
acetate becomes prone to hydrolysis)
II. Susceptibility to biological attack (degradation due to growth of
microbes)
III. Reduction of solvent flux because of compaction or mechanical
compression of membrane at high pressure difference
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
36/118
RO Membrane Properties
• Another common membrane materials in RO systemsare thin film composite (TFC) membranes.
• TFC membranes are not chlorine-tolerant but can
tolerate harsh chemical environments and wide ranges inwater temperature and pH, and are less vulnerable tocompaction than CA membranes.
• TFC membranes generally have higher water flux than CAmembranes because the layers are extremely thin, whichcreates more water transport through the membranematerial.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
37/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
38/118
Membrane Configuration
• Spiral Wound
• Plate and Frame
• Hollow fibre
• Tubular
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
39/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
40/118
Mechanism
• The mechanism of water and salt transport in
reverse osmosis is not completely understood.
• One theory is that water and solutes diffuseseparately through the polymer by a solution-
diffusion mechanism.
• In this mechanism concentration of water in dense
polymer is assumed to be proportional to the activity
of water in the solution
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
41/118
Mechanism
• On the low-pressure side of the dense layer, activity isessentially unity if nearly pure water is produced at 1 atm.
• On the high-pressure side, activity would be slightly less than 1.0 at atmospheric pressure
1.0 at atmospheric pressure
slightly greater than 1.0 at higher pressures
• The upstream pressure is generally set at 20 to 50 atm abovethe osmotic pressure of the feed solution.
• At these pressures, activity of water “aW“ is only a few percentgreater than for pure water at 1 atm and change in activityand concentration across the membrane are small
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
42/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
43/118
• The flux of solute is assumed proportional to the
difference in solution concentration, the diffusivity
and a solubility or distribution coefficient.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
44/118
Concentration Polarization
• Nearly complete rejection of solute by the membrane
leads to a higher concentration at the membrane surface
than in bulk solution and this effect is called
Concentration polarization.
• Concentration polarization reduces the flux of water
because the increase in osmotic pressure reduces the
driving force for water transport.
• The solute rejection decreases both because of the lower
water flux and the greater salt concentration at the
surface increases the flux of solute
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
45/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
46/118
Factors that impact on RO performance
Basic effects of:
• Temperature
• Pressure
• Recovery rate
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
47/118
Temperature Effects
• RO permeate flow is strongly dependent on the
temperature of the feed water.
• The higher the temperature the higher the permeate
flow rate.
• Why? Lower viscosity makes it easier for the water to
permeate through the membrane barrier
• RULE OF THUMB – for every 1˚C the permeate flowwill increase ~ 3%
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
48/118
Temperature Variation on Salt flux
• Solute rejection declines with a temperature rise because
of the osmotic pressure increase with temperature.
•
Increasing temperature increases salt passage more thanwater passage
• Generally you will get better rejections at lower
temperatures
• RULE OF THUMB – salt flux increases 6% for 1˚C increase
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
49/118
Pressure Effects
• Water passage increases with pressure. Soluterejection rises with pressure, since solvent fluxincreases and solute diffusion does not.
• Higher flow of water through the membrane will tendto promote more rapid fouling, the single greatestcause of membrane failure.
• Membrane element manufacturers usually providelimits with regard to the maximum applied pressure tobe used, as a function of feed water quality.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
50/118
Recovery rate Effects
• As recovery is increased, concentration of solute in theconcentrate stream increases, resulting in increasedosmotic pressure which must be overcome.
• Membrane flux declines with increasing soluteconcentration at high recovery rate.
• Large systems typically have recovery rates between40% and 60%. In other words, for every 10 gallons offeed water entering the system, 4 to 6 gallons ofpurified permeate water are produced
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
51/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
52/118
Steps to design RO membrane system
1. System Design Information and Feed Water
2. Selection of Element Type and Average Permeate
Flux
3. Calculation of Number of Total RO Elements4. Decision of Recovery Rate
5. Decision of Number of Stages
6. Decision of Number of RO Elements per PressureVessel
7. Decision of Element Arrangement
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
53/118
1. System Design Information and Feed Water
• The RO membrane system highly depends on the availablefeed water.
• Therefore, the system design information (required product flow rate, expected recovery rate, annual water temperature,water source, application, pretreatment, required product waterquality, operating pressure limit, etc.) and the feed wateranalysis should be thoroughly studied and considered inselection of the RO system design.
• If the required permeate water quality is so high that thequality cannot be achieved by 1pass RO system, and then a2 pass RO system should be considered
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
54/118
2. Selection of Element Type and Average
Permeate Flux
• According to the feed water source, pretreatment and feed watersalinity, the type of RO membrane element is selected.
• Consider the following characteristics while selecting particular
membrane for an application:
Membrane fouling rates
Water flux specification
Solid rejection rate
System pressure requirements Membrane response to cleaning operations and tolerance of
cleaning procedures
Tolerance of pH
Temperature range
Chemical abrasion resistance
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
55/118
Contd …
• Once the water source, pretreatment and RO
element type are fixed by the designer, the
recommended value of the average permeate flux
(also called “design flux”) is given.
• In some cases, the design flux value is determined by
pilot experiment data or customer’s experience.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
56/118
3. Calculation of Number of Total RO Elements
• The relationship between the number of total elements, the product
flow rate and the average permeate flux is expressed as follow equation:
In which:
NE = total element numbers
Q p = product flow rate
JV, ave = average permeate flux
(MA)E = membrane area of element
• The calculated number of RO elements may be a slightly changed based on the
decision of element arrangement, that is, the number of pressure vessel and RO
elements per pressure vessel.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
57/118
4. Decision of Recovery Rate
• In an RO membrane system, a recovery rate as high as
possible is desirable, but a high recovery rate can also cause
some problems as follows
Possibility of scale formation increase because of the increase
of concentration factor
Osmotic pressure increase because of the increase of
concentration factor
Concentrate flow rate decrease
Permeate water quality deterioration because of average feed
concentration increase
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
58/118
Contd …
• The relationship between recovery rate and concentration
factor is shown in Table
• Usually in brackish water desalination, the recovery rate is
decided by scale formation, and in seawater desalination, by
feed pressure limit.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
59/118
5. Decision of Number of Stages
• The number of RO stages defines how
many pressure vessels are in series in
the RO membrane system.
• Every stage consists of a certainnumber of pressure vessels in parallel
• The number of stages is a function of
the system recovery rate, the number
of elements per vessel, and the feed
water quality as shown
6 D i i f N b f RO El
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
60/118
6. Decision of Number of RO Elements per
Pressure Vessel
• RO membrane elements can be coupled together in seriesin the pressure vessel, typically 1-8 elements per onepressure vessel.
• In deciding the number of RO elements per pressure vessel,plant size is usually considered first.
• In a large-scale plant (> 40 m3/h), 6-8 elements perpressure vessel are usually adopted, and in a smaller plant,3- 5 elements per pressure vessel.
• In all cases, the space required to install or remove the ROelements should be considered in the plant design.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
61/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
62/118
7. Decision of Element Arrangement
• The RO element arrangement (array) means elementnumbers per vessel, vessel numbers per stage and stagenumbers per pass.
• For the decision of element arrangement, the systemdesign parameters should be consistent with the designflux guideline.
•
In the case that not every parameter is in accordance withthe design guideline, it is necessary to make a priority inthe parameters. Usually average permeate flux,concentrate flow rate and pressure drop per vessel shouldbe of higher priority.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
63/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
64/118
RO System Components
RO systems consist of the following basic components, which are
common to every RO system. The specifications for each
component vary by application, source water quality, and the
required permeate quality.
• Pre-filter(s): It is common for pre-filters to pretreat the feed
water supply before it enters an RO system. Multiple pre-
filters may be used in an RO system. The most commonly used
pre-filters are sediment filters used to remove sand, silt, dirt,and other sediment. Carbon filters also may be used to
remove chlorine and organic compounds
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
65/118
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
66/118
RO System Components
• Valves: Valves are required to control the flows and pressuresof an RO system for the system to operate correctly andoptimally. There are generally two valves in an RO unit on thefeed water piping and on the concentrate piping.
• Storage tank: Permeate is stored in tanks. Industrial andcommercial storage tanks may hold up to 9000 gallons ofwater.
• Drain line: This line runs from the outlet end of the ROmembrane housing to the drain. This line is used to dispose ofthe concentrate rejected by the membrane element
Diagram of an RO System with Basic
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
67/118
Diagram of an RO System with Basic
Components
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
68/118
REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER TREATMENT PLANT
• The largest scale applications of membrane separation processesare those which form the key step in the desalination, or moregenerally demineralization, of brackish water in the production ofdrinking water.
• An outline is given of such a plant capable of producing 70,000m3/day of drinking water for a large city in the Middle East
• The water to be processed is obtained from a deep well with a totaldissolved solids (TDS) content of 1.4 kg/m3; that is, it is of moderatesalinity and hardness.
• The plant specification required that the product water should havea maximum TDS of 0.5 kg/m3
Flow diagram of reverse osmosis plant for
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
69/118
Flow diagram of reverse osmosis plant for
demineralization of Brackish water
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
70/118
Main Process Steps
Pretreatment
a. Evaporative cooling to reduce the feed water temperature from50 –55◦C to 30 –35◦C which is more compatible with satisfactoryoperation of the reverse osmosis unit and more suitable for final
use.
b. Precipitation softening by addition of slaked lime (Ca(OH)2) andsodium aluminate or ferric chloride. The net result is part-removalof calcium, silica and especially colloids. The clarifiers used ensurecompletion of these processes within the tank.
c. Acidification to optimise removal of residual coagulant.
d. Prechlorination to ensure a disinfected supply to the reverseosmosis plant
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
71/118
Pretreatment
e. Rapid gravity filtration to reduce further the content of particulate
material.
f. Acidification to reduce the pH to 5.0 for optimum life of the
reverse osmosis membrane.
g. Sequestering, addition of sodium hexametaphosphate to retard
the precipitation of calcium sulphate which otherwise will exceed
its solubility limit in the reject stream.
h. Cartridge filtration with elements rated at 25 μm to protect thehigh pressure pumps and reverse osmosis membranes in the
event of a break-through of particulate material.
Demineralization by reverse osmosis
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
72/118
Demineralization by reverse osmosis
• Reverse osmosis was chosen for the demineralization step as
it gave an economic solution in terms of both capital andrunning costs.
• It allowed a high water recovery rate, was modular in
construction and so could be easily extended, could cope withreasonable variations in feed salinity.
• The pre-booster pumps, cartridge filters and high pressurepumps are arranged in seven parallel streams, one of which ison standby
• A total of thirteen reverse osmosis stacks is installed, anytwelve of which will meet the required throughput
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
73/118
Demineralization by reverse osmosis
• Each stack contains 210 reverse osmosis modulesaccommodated in 35 pressure vessels arranged in aseries –parallel array of 20 –10 –5 to achieve the desiredwater recovery
• These modules are of the spirally wound type.
• The permeate from the unit is blended with theslipstream flow, with pH adjustment if necessary, to
maintain a final water TDS < 0.5 kg/m3.
• The reject is discharged to evaporation ponds.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
74/118
Separation of Gases
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
75/118
Porous Membranes
• When a gas mixture is allowed to diffuse through aporous membrane to a region of lower pressure, gaspermeating the membrane is enriched in low molecular-weight components since they diffuse more rapidly.
• When the pores are much smaller than mean free path inthe has phase, the gases diffuse independently byKnudsen Diffusion.
•Diffusivity in the pore is proportional to the pore size andaverage molecular velocity, which varies inversely withthe square root of molecular weight.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
76/118
Contd …
• The flux per unit membrane area depends on aneffective diffusivity De that is lower than the pore
diffusivity by the factor ( ԑ/τ ) where ԑ is the porosityand τ the tortuosity.
• For membranes with about 50% porosity, this factor
is generally 0.2 to 0.3
• The flux of each gas is proportional to the concentration
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
77/118
• The flux of each gas is proportional to the concentration
gradient, which is linear if the membrane structure is
uniform and the gases do not interact.
• Usually the gradient is expressed as a partial pressure
gradient and ideal gases are assumed
• The composition of the permeate depends on the fluxes
of all species. For a binary system, mole fraction of A in
the permeate is
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
78/118
Typical Pressure gradients in a porous membrane
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
79/118
Polymer Membranes
• The transport of gases through dense (non-porous) polymer
membranes occurs by a solution-diffusion mechanism.
•The gas dissolve in the polymer at the higher pressure side ofmembranes, diffuses through the polymer phase, and desorbs
or evaporates at the low pressure side.
•The rate of the mass transfer depends on the concentrationgradient in the membrane, which is proportional to the partial
pressure gradient if solubility is proportional to the pressure.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
80/118
Gradients in a dense Polymer Membrane
• Henry’s law is assumed toapply for each gas and
equilibrium is assumed at
the interface.
• The gas-film resistances
are neglected for this
case, so the partialpressures at the gas-
polymer interface are
same as those in the bulk
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
81/118
• The flux for gas A is
• The concentrations are related to the partial pressures by a
solubility coefficient S, which has units such as (mol /cm3.atm)
• Replace the concentration gradient with a pressure gradient
gives
The product DASA is the flux per unit pressure gradient, which is called
permeability coefficient ‘ q A’ and often expressed in Barrers.
• Since the actual membrane thickness is not always known or
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
82/118
• Since the actual membrane thickness is not always known orspecified for commercial membranes, it is customary to usethe flux per unit pressure difference, which will be called the
permeability (Q A )
•The ratio of permeabilities for a binary mixture is themembrane selectivity α (also called the ideal separation
factor)
• A high selectivity can be obtained from either a favorable diffusivity ratioor large difference in solubilities.
• The diffusivities in the membrane depend more strongly on the size andshape of molecules than do gas phase diffusivities
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
83/118
• Permeabilities reported for light gases in a few polymers are
listed in table
•
The permeabilities are much greater for rubber and siliconethan for polysulfone and other glassy polymers.
• The permeability goes through a minimum with increasing
molecular weight or size of the gas molecule.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
84/118
Pervaporation
I t d ti
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
85/118
Introduction
• Pervaporation is a separation process in which one ormore components of a liquid mixture diffuse through
a selective membrane, evaporate under low pressure
on downstream side and are removed by a vacuum
pump or a chilled condenser.
• The process differs from other membrane processes
in that there is a phase change from liquid to vaporin the permeate.
I t d ti
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
86/118
Introduction
• The driving force in the membrane is achieved bylowering the activity of the permeating components atthe permeate side.
• Components in the mixture permeate through themembrane and evaporate as a result of the partialpressure on the permeate side being held lower than thesaturation vapor pressures.
• The driving force is controlled by applying a vacuum onthe permeate side
S h i Di f P i i
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
87/118
Schematic Diagram of Pervaporation unit
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
88/118
• Composite membranes are used with dense layer in
contact with the liquid and the porous supporting layer
exposed to the vapor.
• Pervaporation is favored when the feed solution is dilute
in the main permeant because sensible heat of the feedmixture provides the permeant enthalpy of vaporization
• The phase change occurs in the membrane and the heat
of vaporization is supplied by the sensible heat of theliquid conducted through the thin dense layer.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
89/118
A li ti
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
90/118
Applications
• Dehydration of ethanol or the production of high purityethanol by a hybrid process which also incorporates
distillation.
• Such separations use cellulose-acetate-based composite-membranes, with an active layer of polyvinyl alcohol.
• Membranes used for ethanol purification are also suitable for
dehydration of many other organic solvents includingmethanol, isopropanol, butanol, MEK, acetone and
chlorinated solvents.
A li ti
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
91/118
Applications
• Removal of volatile organic contaminants from waterusing silicone rubber or organophilic polymers for themembrane.
• The separation of close-boiling organic mixtures likebenzene –cyclohexane is receiving much attention.
• Separating benzene from cyclohexane consisting of acellulose acetate support matrix and incorporatingpolyphosphonates to improve the preferentialpermeability of benzene.
C i f th l t biliti
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
92/118
Comparison of ethanol – water separabilities
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
93/118
Pervaporation Processes
H b id f l f t f th l
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
94/118
Hybrid process for removal of water from ethanol
Dehydration of dichloroethylene
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
95/118
Dehydration of dichloroethylene.
Removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
96/118
f g p ( ) f
wastewater
Membrane Selection and Modules
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
97/118
Membrane Selection and Modules
• Membrane selection is critical in the commercialapplication of PV.
• For water permeation, Hydrophilic membrane materialsare preferred.
• For example, a three-layer composite membrane is used forthe dehydration of ethanol, with water being the mainpermeating species.
• The support layer is porous polyester, which is cast on amicroporous polyacrylonitrile or polysulfone membrane.The final layer, which provides the separation, is dense PVAof 0.1 mm in thickness.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
98/118
• Hydrophobic membranes, such as silicone rubber and Teflon,
are preferred when organics are the permeating species.
• Commercial membrane modules for PV are almost exclusively
of the Plate-and-frame type because of the ease of using
gasketing materials that are resistant to organic solvents and
the ease of providing heat exchange for vaporization and
high-temperature operation.
• Hollow-fiber modules are used for removal of VOCs from
wastewater. Because feeds are generally clean and operation
is at low pressure, membrane fouling and damage is minimal,
resulting in a useful membrane life of 2 –4 years.
Mechanism
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
99/118
Mechanism
•The flux of each component is proportional to the concentrationgradient and the diffusivity in the dense layer.
• However, the concentration gradient is often non-linear becausethe membrane swells appreciably as it absorbs liquid.
• Diffusion coefficient in the fully swollen polymer may be 10 to 100times the value in unswollen polymer.
• When the polymer is swollen mainly by absorption of onecomponent, the diffusivity of other components is increased also.
• This interaction makes it difficult to develop correlations formembrane permeability and selectivity.
Mechanism
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
100/118
Mechanism
•Models for transport of permeant through a membrane bypervaporation have been proposed, based on solution-diffusion.
• They assume equilibrium between the upstream liquid and
the upstream membrane surface & between thedownstream vapor and its membrane side.
• Membrane transport follows Fick’s law, with a permeantconcentration gradient as the driving force.
• However, because of phase change and non ideal-solutionfeed, simple equations do not apply.
Mechanism
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
101/118
Mechanism
• A convenient PV model is that of Wijmans and Baker who express the driving force for permeation in terms ofa partial-vapor-pressure difference.
• Pressures on both sides of the membrane are low, thegas phase follows the ideal-gas law.
• Therefore, at the upstream membrane surface (1),
permeant activity for component i is
where Psi is the vapor pressure at the feed temperature
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
102/118
Mechanism
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
103/118
Mechanism
•If non-linear effects are neglected than the corresponding permeant flux , after dropping unnecessary superscripts, is
where
PMi is called permeability coefficient expressed in Barrers units
is termed as Permeability
• In commercial applications of PV, liquid feed usually has a low concentration ofthe more permeable species, so swelling of the membrane and resulting non-linear effects are not as pronounced as when testing solutions of highconcentration.
Gradients in a Pervaporation membrane
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
104/118
Gradients in a Pervaporation membrane
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
105/118
DIALYSIS
Introduction
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
106/118
Introduction
• In a dialysis membrane-separation process, the feed is a liquid,at pressure P1, containing solvent, solutes of type A, and solutes
of type B and/or insoluble, but dispersed, colloidal matter.
•A sweep liquid or wash of the same solvent is fed at pressure P2to the other side of the membrane.
• The membrane is thin with micropores of a size such that solutes
of type A can pass through by a concentration driving force.
• Solutes of type B are larger in molecular size than those of type
A and pass through the membrane only with difficulty or not at
all.
Introduction
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
107/118
Introduction
• Colloids do not pass through the membrane.
• With pressure P1 = P2, the solvent may also pass throughthe membrane, but by a concentration-driving force
acting in the opposite direction.
• The transport of the solvent is called osmosis.
• By elevating P1 above P2, solvent osmosis can bereduced or eliminated if the difference is higher than theosmotic pressure.
Contd
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
108/118
Contd …
• The products of a dialysis unit (dialyzer) are a liquiddiffusate ( permeate) containing solvent, solutes of
type A, and little or none of type B solutes; and a
dialysate (retentate) of solvent, type B solutes,
remaining type A solutes, and colloidal matter.
• Ideally, the dialysis unit would enable a perfect
separation between solutes of type A and solutes oftype B and any colloidal matter
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
109/118
Example
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
110/118
Example
• When dialysis is used to recover sulfuric acid (type Asolute) from an aqueous stream containing sulfate salts
(type B solutes), the following results are obtained
• Thus, about 64% of the H2SO4 is recovered in the
diffusate, accompanied by only 6% of the CuSO4, and no
NiSO4.
Applications
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
111/118
Applications
• Recovery of chromic, hydrochloric, and hydrofluoric acids fromcontaminating metal ions.
• Removal of alcohol from beer to produce a low-alcohol beer.
• Recovery of nitric and hydrofluoric acids from spent stainless steel pickleliquor.
• Removal of mineral acids from organic compounds.
• Removal of low-molecular-weight contaminants from polymers.
• Hemodialysis, in which urea, creatine, uric acid, phosphates, and chloridesare removed from blood without removing essential higher-molecularweight compounds and blood cells in a device called an artificial kidney
Membrane Types & Modules
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
112/118
Membrane Types & Modules
•Typical microporous-membrane materials used in dialysis arehydrophilic, including cellulose, cellulose acetate, various acid-resistant polyvinyl copolymers, polysulfones, and
polymethylmethacrylate.
•Typically less than 50 mm thick and with pore diameters of 15to 100 Ȧ
• The most common membrane modules are plate-and-frame and hollow-fiber.
• Dialysis membranes can be thin because pressures on eitherside of the membrane are essentially equal.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
113/118
Contd…
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
114/118
Contd …
• In a plate-and-frame dialyzer, the flow pattern is nearlycountercurrent.
• Because total flow rates change little and solute
concentrations are small, it is common to estimate solute
transport rate by assuming a constant overall mass-transfer coefficient with a log-mean concentration-
driving force
Rate Equation
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
115/118
Rate Equation
• The differential rate of solute mass transfer acrossthe membrane is
• where Ki is the overall mass-transfer coefficient, in terms of
the three coefficients
• where kiF and kiP are mass-transfer coefficients for the feed-
side and permeate-side boundary layers (or films)
Contd…
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
116/118
Contd …
•If a solute does not interact with the membrane material,effective diffusivity De , is the ordinary molecular-diffusioncoefficient, which depends only on solute and solventproperties.
• In practice, the membrane may have a profound effect onsolute diffusivity if membrane –solute interactions such ascovalent, ionic, and hydrogen bonding; physical adsorptionand chemisorption; and increases in membrane polymer
flexibility occur.
• Thus, it is best to measure PMi experimentally using processfluids.
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
117/118
•Transport of solvents such as water, usually in a directionopposite to the solute, can be described in terms of Fick’s law
• It is common to measure the solvent flux and report a so-called water-transport number , which is the ratio of thewater flux to the solute flux , with a negative value indicatingtransport of solvent in the solute direction
• Design parameters for dialyzers are best measured in the
laboratory using a batch cell with a variable-speed stirringmechanism on both sides of the membrane so that externalmass-transfer resistances, 1/kiF and 1/kiP are made negligible
-
8/17/2019 Membrane Separation Process
118/118
• A common dialyzer is the plate-and-frame type.For dialysis, the frames are vertical and a unitmight contain 100 square frames, each 0.75 m0.75 m on 0.6-cm spacing, equivalent to 56 m2 of
membrane surface.
• Recent dialysis units utilize hollow fibers of 200-
mm inside diameter, 16-mm wall thickness, and28-cm length, packed into a heat exchanger- likemodule to give 22.5 m2 of membrane area.