memo - edgeedge.rit.edu/edge/p13481/public/presentations/p13481 ddr... · web viewuse rubbery...
TRANSCRIPT
KGCOE MSD Detailed Design Review
P13481 Underwater Leak Detector
Team Members: Brendan Harder, Gabe Nicasio, Pete Goebel, Matt Strickler, Joe Malanga
Meeting Purpose: A detailed review of the Underwater Leak Detector
Materials Reviewed:
Project Background
Updated Customer Needs, Engineering Specs
Pugh Diagram
Risk Assessment matrix
Feasibility Testing
Circuitry
Leak Detector CAD Design
Bill of Materials
Attendees
Dr. Jim Moon - EE
Professor Ed Hanzlik – ME
Les More- ME
Meeting Time and Location:
Friday November 2nd 2012
Time: 10 am- 12 pm
Room 09-2130
KGCOE MSD Page 2 of 22 Technical Review Agenda
A colleague came to a student for advice on ways to locate leaks in pools. After suggesting currently used above water technology for pool leak detection, it was discovered by the colleague that a hand held unit was needed. After attempting to find a unit that could satisfy his needs it was realized that nothing like it exists, especially on a consumer-affordable level. The student sought an opportunity to develop a similar technology for the detection of above ground pool leaks built for the average consumer. This is a blank slate project.
Project Background
Problem StatementThe primary objective of this project is to design and develop a underwater handheld leak detector that is affordable to the general above ground pool owner. The leak detector should capture acoustic energy produced by an underwater leak and visually indicate to user the unit location in proximity to the leak.
Objectives/Scope1. Create a low-cost and easy to use leak detector2. Detector must have a range of detection to within a foot
Deliverables
● A working hand held underwater prototype unit● Methodology and hardware to test leak detection system. The system will include
most of the common types of leaks in an above ground pool.● A design proposal for a cost-effective , user friendly production design.● A concise documentation package of development and design activities, test
methods and results, shortfalls, and proposed next steps.
Expected Project Benefits● Functional handheld underwater leak detector (MSDII)● New Design, Drawings, Sketches● Well documented acoustic energy produced by various size leaks.● Attachment to pool pole (MSDII)
User NeedsNeed Priori
ty Nominal Value Ideal Value Corresponding Spec
Detects leak within specified distance 1 1 ft. 2 ft. 1, 11, 12, 13Operates under
user “conditions” 1 2 ft. visibility 4 ft. visibility 7, 9, 10Gives visual
representation of distance to leak
2 LED indicator LED indicator 10
Portable 2 5 lbs 2 lbs 5, 6Easy to Train/Use 2 Training Time < 1
hr.Training Time < 30
min1, 2, 5, 6, 7,
9, 10Operates for entire
dive without recharging
1 1 hour 3 hours 2, 3
Battery is easy to replace 2 Time < 10 min Time < 5 min 3
Does not impede diver 1
25 meter swim with unit is <125% of time without unit
25 meter swim with unit is <110% of time without unit
5, 6, 9
Parts cost less than $100 (mass production)
1 $100 $80 3, 11, 12, 13
Can be used in halogen (chlorine,
bromine) with minimal damage
2
Housing does not noticeably degrade
over a 24 hour period being left in chlorinated pool.
Housing does not noticeably degrade
over a 48 hour period being left in chlorinated pool.
4, 7, 9
Does not damage pool 1 Rounded Edges Soft Touch Rounded
edges 5, 6, 7Indicates if power is
on 2 LED Indicator LED Indicator 10
KGCOE MSD Page 3 of 22 Technical Review
Engineering SpecificationsEngr. Spec
. #Importance Specification (description) Unit of
Measure Marginal Value Ideal Value
1 1 Radius of Detection Feet 1 foot 2 feet2 1 Battery life Hours 1 Hr 3 Hrs3 2 Battery type Voltage 2-9 Volt 1-9 Volt4 2 Operating Temperature Degrees 50-100 F 32-100 F5 2 Weight Pounds 3 lbs 2 lbs6 3 Dimensions Inches 12"x4"x6" 10"x4"x2"7 1 Waterproof up to Feet 6 Feet 10 Feet8 1 Hole size detection range Inches >.25 in >.1in9 2 Buoyancy Newtons 0 N -.5 N
10 2 LED Brightness mcd 100 mcd 120 mcdHydrophone Specs
11 2 Directional Characteristics direction Omnidirectional Unidirectional
12 1 Frequency Range Hz 90-1300 Hz No13 1 Sensitivity dB -60 dB No
KGCOE MSD Page 4 of 22 Technical Review
Assumptions and Constraints
1. Using a pre-made hydrophone, will increase the cost of our overall system. However, there is an assumption that a large order of hydrophones for a “mass-production” of leak detectors would result in a discounted price per hydrophone, therefore resulting in a lower final system cost than our prototype cost. In MSDII we will try and create our own “low cost” hydrophone.
2. We are assuming that the material which has a leak is vinyl.3. Project budget not to exceed $10004. Measurements will be taken at rest. (Holding breath, not moving unit/moving very slow)5. Leaks are influenced by top to bottom location in pool; leaks near the top are harder to
detect due to lower hydrostatic pressure.6. Users of system will be able to differentiate noise and real leak signal.7. We are assuming an above ground circular pool, depth of 5 feet.
Functional Decomposition
Pugh Diagra
m Concepts
Criteria Leaktronics
Sound Detector
Current Detector
Pressure Sensor
Camera Detector
Cost
Datum
+ + + -Portabilit
y + - - +Hand-Held + - + -
Waterproof + s s s
Ease of Use + s s -
Range s + - -User
Safety + s s sChemical Interactio
n+ s s s
Power Consump
tion+ + + +
Sum of "+" 8 3 3 2
Sum of "-" 0 2 2 4
Sum of "s" 1 4 4 3
KGCOE MSD Page 5 of 22 Technical Review
Block Diagram
Risk Prevention Plan
Mitigation Plan
Severity
Likelihood
Importance
KGCOE MSD Page 6 of 22 Technical Review
Risk Assessment
Varying Frequency
Bands
Varying filter
settings
Potentiometer and
sensitivity dial
3 3 9
Waterproofing
Silicone Ring Seal
Silicone Ring w/ Silicone Caulk
3 2 6
Scuba gear
resonating with hole frequency
Holding breath while taking
readings
Cancel Scuba
Noise by “playing
back” canceling
signal.
2 2 4
Shockproofing
Use rubber circuit Mounts
Use rubbery casing
and rubber circuit
mounts
2 1 2
Battery Life
Use 2 C batteries
Use 2 D batteries 1 1 1
KGCOE MSD Page 7 of 22 Technical Review
Test Results – First Round of Testing
Filtered and unfiltered sample from half inch hole, 8 inches away
KGCOE MSD Page 8 of 22 Technical Review
Filtered and unfiltered sample from half inch hole, one inch away
Test Results – First Round of Testing
Test Results – Second Round of Testing
KGCOE MSD Page 9 of 22 Technical Review
Leak noise sample mean amplitude versus distance
KGCOE MSD Page 10 of 22 Technical Review
Filtered and unfiltered sample from half inch hole 1 – 6 ft away
Preamp - NXP Semiconductors TDA1517P/N3,112
Preamp
2 x 20 dB 6W (max) amplifiers
6V – 18V supply voltage, ~650 mA worst case
Texas Instruments LMV771 Op Amp
Amplifier/Filter
100 dB max gain
5.5V max supply voltage, ~1mA worst case
Texas Instruments LM3914 LED Driver
Comparator with 10 LED outputs
Floating 10-step divider
6.8 V – 18V supply voltage, ~ 10 mA per LED
Battery Type Qty Voltage Amp- Hours Estimated Current (mA) Estimated Battery Life (Hours)9V Alkaline 1 9 0.565 0.751 0.75
KGCOE MSD Page 11 of 22 Technical Review
Chosen IC Specs
Preamp Circuit
KGCOE MSD Page 12 of 22 Technical Review
Circuit Design
Filter Circuit
KGCOE MSD Page 13 of 22 Technical Review
Circuit Design
LED Circuit
KGCOE MSD Page 14 of 22 Technical Review
Circuit Design
KGCOE MSD Page 15 of 22 Technical Review
Concept Development
KGCOE MSD Page 16 of 22 Technical Review
Concept Development
KGCOE MSD Page 17 of 22 Technical Review
CAD Design
KGCOE MSD Page 18 of 22 Technical Review
CAD Design
KGCOE MSD Page 19 of 22 Technical Review
KGCOE MSD Page 20 of 22 Technical Review
Part Name Manufacturer Manufacturer Part #
Quantity Needed Ordered Unit Price Total Price Lead Time Owner Status Comments
Elec
tric
al
LMV771MGCT-ND National Semiconductor
LPV511MG-NOPB 5 10 $1.46 $14.60 1 Week Matt/Joe Received Op-Amp
LPV511MGCT-ND National Semiconductor
LPV511MGCT-NOPB 5 10 $1.46 $14.60 1 Week Matt/Joe Received Op-Amp
DE2SRD Kingbright DE2SRD 5 10 $0.79 $7.90 1 Week Matt/Joe Received LEDs
568-1128-5-ND NXP Semiconductors TDA1517/N3,112 1 10 $1.32 $13.20 1 Week Matt/Joe Received Preamp IC
LM3914N Texas Instuments LM3914N-1/NOPB-ND 1 5 $2.15 $10.75 1 Week Matt/Joe Received IC LED Driver
Printed Circuit Board Matt S.
Batteries Joe M.
Hou
sing
Prototype Housing - - 5 - $1.00 $5.00 2 days Gabe N. 1 Done
Foam - - 5 Blocks 5 $5.00 $25.00 - Gabe N. 1 Done
Bondo 1 1 $8.00 $8.00 Brendan H. Received
Test
ing
Hydrophone Aquarian Audio H1c 1 1 $129.00 $129.00 1 Week Brendan H. Received
Cable Termination Aquarian Audio TERM 1 1 $5.00 $5.00 1 Week Brendan
H. Received
Cable Aquarian Audio CA-40 3 3 $3.50 $10.50 1 Week Brendan H. Received
1/4" TRS-Male Aquarian Audio NYS224BG 1 1 $2.50 $2.50 1 Week Brendan H. Received
Shipping - - 1 1 $7.22 $7.22 1 Week Brendan H.
Pre-Amp - - 1 - $0.00 $0.00 - Pete G.
GoPro HD GoPro - 1 - $0.00 $0.00 - Brendan H. Borrowed
Underwater Lens GoPro - 2 - $50.00 $50.00 3 days Brendan H.
Pool - - 1 - $0.00 $0.00 - Pete G. Borrowed
Plastic Welding Kit Harbor Freight 96712 1 1 $69.99 $69.99 1 day Brendan H.
Red Filter GoPro - 1 1 $50.00 $50.00 1 Week Brendan H.
Totals $423.26Legend Received Ready to order Not Ready
KGCOE MSD Page 21 of 22 Technical Review
Bill Of Materials
KGCOE MSD Page 22 of 22 Technical Review