7/30/2019 Memorandum 10741

1/4

PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff, by counsel, respectfully submits its memorandum in the case:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiff Jonna Bueno, filed an action for damages against Gloria Supermart, Inc., beforethe Regional Trial Court of Quezon City. She claims P500,000.00 as damages for the injuries

suffered by her minor son, Ricky, caused by the negligence of the defendants employees and for

the emotional pain and suffering that it caused to them. Defendant Gloria Supermart denies her

claim and asserts that it was not negligent. Instead, it claims that the accident was caused byJonnas negligence and she alone should be made to suffer the consequences of her own actions.

Both parties have presented their evidences and witnesses. The case is now submitted for

decision.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

At about ten in the morning of May 11, 2010, Jonna Bueno and her 5-year old son,

Ricky, were grocery shopping at Gloria Supermart located in Ortigas Avenue, San Juan, Metro

Manila. Supposedly, they were to buy tomato sauce for Rickys spaghetti along with other

things. In the middle of their shopping, a small ball rolled along the aisle and Ricky ran for it.However, he stepped over a puddle of syrup and slipped. He fell so hard with a heavy bang that

shrieked in pain. Apparently, he hurt his wrist as he tried to stop his fall. Jonna immediately

come to his sons aid. As she attended him, she noticed that the syrup on the floor seeped outfrom a leaking bottle in a nearby shelf. Meanwhile, Rene Castro, the supermarket supervisor,

approached her. She asked him to help her carry her son to her car, so that she can rush him tothe hospital. She then brought Ricky to the Philippine Orthopaedic Hospital, where he was

handled by Dr. John D. Lim, the physician-on-duty at the emergency room. Dr. Lim operated on

Rickys right wrist. He had to restore the position of his fractured bone. Thereafter, he requiredRicky to stay overnight at the hospital for pain management and care. Ricky was released the

next day. At first, he complained that his wrist caused him great pain. Later on, he moved with

discomfort and difficulty. He was unable to use both hands. It took him 6 weeks to fullyrecover. His mother spent P22,840.00 all in all for his doctors fee, hospitalization and

medication. Moreover, she experienced mental suffering as she witnessed her only sons painful

recovery.

On the other hand, Rene Castro, Glorias supermarket supervisor, testified for the

defendant. He claimed that at ten in the morning of May 11, 2010, he was fixing the new stock

of instant noodles when he heard a commotion at the next aisle. He quickly walked towards thenoise and saw Ricky lying on the floor and crying in pain. His mother, Jonna, was trying to

minister him. He observed that bottles of syrup from a nearby shelf fell from the floor, including

a glass bottle that was broken and spilled part of its contents to the floor. He assisted Jonna inrushing Ricky to the hospital. While Ricky was undergoing surgery, he talked to Jonna and she

said that her son slipped on the floor because some syrup seeped out of a leaking bottle in one of

the shelves. She blamed the supermarket for the accident. Though he thought differently, Renekept his silence.

7/30/2019 Memorandum 10741

2/4

ISSUES

The issues of the case, as determined by the court in its pre-trial order, are asfollows:

1. Whether or not Gloria Supermart is liable for damages for the injury suffered byRicky Bueno; and

2. Whether or not Jonna Bueno was contributorily negligent for the accident, which

calls for the reduction in claimed damages.

ARGUMENTS

1. GLORIA SUPERMART IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES SINCE ITSEMPLOYEES NEGLIGENCE WAS THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF THE

ACCIDENT.

As it can be gleaned from the records, Ricky suffered from a fractured bone when he

tried to stop his fall as he slipped over a puddle of syrup. The syrup apparently seeped out from

a broken bottle in a nearby shelf. Ordinarily, the supermarkets employees should have detected

the mess and cleaned the area. At the very least, it should have placed a warning sign informingbuyers to pass by with caution. But it didnt. It failed to meet its responsibility to keep the

premises neat and clear from obstructions. It was negligent in maintaining cleanliness and

should be held accountable if by reason of such negligence, customers have suffered frommishaps.

In Jarco Marketing Corporation v. Court of Appeals (G.R. 129792, December 21, 1999),

the Court defined negligence as the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided

by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or thedoing of something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. Following this

definition, the test of negligence is therefore this: could a prudent man, in the position of the

person to whom negligence is attributed, foresee harm to the person injured as a reasonableconsequence of the course actually pursued? Applying this question to the case, it is clear that

Gloria Supermart was negligent. As a supermarket, tons of customers pass by its aisles everyday

to purchase something. It was the responsibility of Gloria to keep those aisles clean and clear in

order to ensure the safety and continued patronage of its buyers. When a bottle of syrup gotbroken and its contents spilled on the floor, it was the burden of Gloria to keep on eye out for

these expected eventualities and to immediately address the issue. It should have expected, like

any ordinarily prudent and reasonable man, that a hapless buyer would eventually step on itwithout noticing and slip because of it. After all, buyers do not look on the floor when they buy

their groceries. It is common knowledge that they look sideways on the aisles as they search

for the items they need. Gloria should have deployed employees to regularly survey their aislesand see if they steered clear from obstructions.

This negligence was the proximate cause of Rickys injury. Proximate cause is definedas that cause, which, in natural and continuous sequence unbroken by any efficient intervening

7/30/2019 Memorandum 10741

3/4

cause, produces the injury, and without which the result would not have occurred. (Ramos v.COL Realty Corp., G.R. No. 184905, August 28, 2009). Had there been no syrup on the floor,

Ricky would not have slipped and suffered a bad fall. Even if, admittedly, Ricky was running at

the time he stepped on the puddle, he wouldnt have ordinarily fractured his bone had the floorbeen clear from obstructions. Besides, syrups, by their very nature, are transparent. Only a

scrutinizing eye can detect its presence on the floor and buyers are not expected to act in thismanner.

Considering that Gloria Supermarts employees were negligent and such negligence was

the proximate cause for Rickys injury, Gloria Supermart should be held accountable. Article

2180 of the Civil Code supports this conclusion. It states,

The obligation imposed by Article 2176 is demandable not only

for ones own acts or omissions, but also for those persons for whom one isresponsible.

xxx xxx xxx

The owners and managers of an establishment or enterprise arelikewise responsible for damages caused by their employees in the service of

the branches in which the latter are employed or on the occasion of their

functions.

2. JONNA BUENO WAS NOT CONTRIBUTORILY NEGLIGENT FOR

HER SONS INJURY

Jonna was not negligent in watching over her son, while they were grocery shopping.

Indeed, parents have the natural right and duty to take care and discipline their children. ButJonna did not show lack of due care when she let Ricky run after the ball. The records show that

she was watching her son at that time. Furthermore, a child running after a ball does not

necessarily mean that he is engaged in play. The child may be actually trying to fetch the balland return it to its rightful place or owner. There was no reason for Jonna discipline nor closely

monitor her child at that time. Also, Jonna couldnt have reasonably foreseen her sons mishap.

As mentioned earlier, the syrup was presumably transparent and couldnt be detected unlessscrutinized up close. She also had good reason to believe that the supermarket regularly

maintains the cleanliness of its store. There is no basis to find her negligent.

3. GRANTING ARGUENDO THAT THERE IS NO PROOF AS TOWHO OR WHAT CAUSED THE SYRUP TO FALL ON THE

FLOOR, GLORIA SUPERMARKET IS STILL LIABLE UNDER RES

IPSA LOQUITOR.

In his testimony, Rene Castro made a baseless inference that the syrup on the

floor must have come from one of the bottles that Ricky knocked off from the shelfwhen he ran wild down the aisle. This should not be given credence since Rene himself testified

that he did not see how the incident happened. Therefore, he did not have the competence to

testify on that matter. But granting, for the sake of argument, that there is no proof as to who orwhat caused the spillage, Gloria Supermart should still be held liable based on the doctrine of res

7/30/2019 Memorandum 10741

4/4

ipsa loquitor. First of all, Rickys accident, as explained earlier, was due to the supermarketemployees negligence in failing to maintain the cleanliness of the store. Secondly, it is without

a doubt that the supermarkets premises is within exclusive management and control of Gloria

Supermart. Thirdly, it has been established that Ricky did not contribute to his injury. Any otherperson would have slipped, had they stepped on the syrup-coated floor. All these three elements

put into operation the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor, which strengthens plaintiffs position that thesupermarket is liable for damages.

4. JONNA IS ENTITLED TO ACTUAL DAMAGES AND MORAL

DAMAGES

Jonna has presented receipts proving that she incurred P22,840.00 in expenses for her

sons over-all treatment. Based on Art. 2199 of the Civil Code, she is entitled to actual damages.

In addition, she is entitled for moral damages for the mental suffering she experienced. Sincethis action is based on Gloria Supermarts quasi-delict resulting in physical injuries, she should

be allowed to recover it in accordance with Art. 2219 of the Civil Code.

PRAYER

Wherefore, plaintiff prays that the court renders judgment:

1. finding Gloria Supermart liable for damages, and2. ordering the defendant to pay P500,000.00 all-in-all as damages

including P22,840.00 as compensatory damages.

All other just and equitable reliefs are prayed for.

x x x x

Counsel for the Plaintiff

AddressAttorney Roll No.

IBP

MCLE No.