memorandum of understanding between the national … however, the office of the vp-ats will notify...

ERR/SOP/Release Policy MOU -‐ CORRECTED of 5

Memorandum of Understanding between the

National Air Traffic Controllers Association, AFL-CIO and the

Federal Aviation Administration

This Agreement is made by and between the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, AFL-CIO (“NATCA” or “Union”) and the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA” or “Agency”), collectively known as “the Parties.” This Agreement represents the complete understanding of the Parties concerning the establishment of the National Collaborative Placement Team (NCPT) and associated Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and a National Release Policy. Section 1. Article 42, Sections 6, 10 and 13 of the 2009 Collective Bargaining Agreement shall be replaced as follows:

Section 6. Employees desiring consideration for placement to a specific bargaining unit position at a specific facility may make voluntary application for transfers to facilities of the same, lower, or higher level by submitting the appropriate forms as outlined in Agency directives, to the Human Resource Management Division having jurisdiction over the position(s). The type of position applied for and specific location must be stated. The employee shall not normally be eligible to receive any permanent change of station (PCS) benefits unless the selection was made in conjunction with a vacancy announcement where PCS benefits were authorized. In that case the individual requesting voluntary transfer shall be entitled to the same benefits as advertised on the vacancy announcement. Employees shall submit the following forms to the appropriate Human Resource Management Division: a. cover letter stating: “Filed in accordance with Employee Requested Reassignment for ________ position at (name of facility)”; b. FAA Form 3330-42, Request for Consideration and Acknowledgment; c. FAA Form 3330-43-1, Rating of Air Traffic Experience for AT Transfer Program; d. OF-612 or a resume; and e. most recent performance appraisal. Upon receipt of the package the receiving office will advise the employee that they have received his/her request. The application shall remain on file for fifteen (15) months from receipt, unless it has been updated in writing by the employee. Once an employee accepts a Tentative Offer Letter (TOL) to a specific facility, all other requests made under this Section, by that employee will be deleted. An


employee who declines a TOL for a particular facility, will have to resubmit a request under this Section for future consideration for that facility.

Section 10. If as a result of a grievance being filed under this Article, the Agency agrees or an arbitrator decides that an employee was improperly excluded from the best qualified list, he/she will receive priority consideration, as defined in Article 100, for the next appropriate vacancy for which he/she is qualified. If the employee is selected for the vacancy, the priority consideration will be considered to be satisfied. An appropriate vacancy is one at the same grade level, which would normally be filled by competitive procedures, or by other placement action, including outside recruitment, in the same area of consideration, and which has comparable opportunities as the position for which the employee was improperly excluded. Employees will be afforded the opportunity to utilize their priority consideration status when their facility meets the criteria established in Article 42 Section 13 (A) of this Agreement. Section 13. The following National Release Policy applies to all bargaining unit employees that are leaving their existing position of record and moving to another ATO position of record within or outside the bargaining unit.

A. The National Release Policy will be based on the ratio of CPCs currently and

projected to be on-board to the CPC Staffing Level as follows:

Category 1: CPC Current and Projected AOB > 90% Facility CPC staffing level: Release dates shall be within three (3) months of selection, or at the election of the employee no later than six (6) months.

Category 2: CPC Current and Projected AOB > CPC AOB national average: Release dates shall be within twelve (12) months of selection.

Projected AOB is defined as anticipated gains/losses of CPCs within the next twelve (12) months.

B. Extensions beyond the timeframes identified above or other deviations from

the National Release Policy for facilities that fall within the criteria for Category 1 and 2 require approval of the office of the Vice President of Air Traffic Services (VP-ATS). Decisions of the VP-ATS office are not subject to review, however, the office of the VP-ATS will notify the Union at the National Level in advance of issuing the decision to the affected facility and/or employee.

C. Extensions beyond the timeframes identified above or other deviations from

the National Release Policy for facilities that do not meet the criteria for Category 1 or 2 require approval of the Office of the Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the Air Traffic Organization (ATO). Decisions of the COO office are not subject to review, however, the COO office will notify the Union at


the National Level in advance of issuing the decision to the affected facility and/or employee.

D. The National Release Policy supersedes all facility-level release policies.

Facility release policies are not authorized pursuant to this Agreement.

E. The C90/N90 Return Rights and Priority Release MOU dated February 12, 2014, the Article 60 Priority Placement MOU dated January 6, 2010, transfers under Article 99 of the this Agreement are not subject to the provisions of the National Release Policy.

F. Temporary FLM promotions within a facility will be handled in accordance

with the ERR SOP dated November 4, 2015. The National Release Policy shall apply to employees while serving on a temporary FLM promotion within a facility.

G. Temporary assignments to other bargaining unit positions within the facility

exceeding one-hundred and twenty (120) days, consecutively or non-consecutively, within any twelve (12) month period are subject to the National Release Policy. The National Release Policy shall apply to employees while serving on a temporary assignment within a facility.

H. With the exception of paragraph E, all other release dates for employees

within the same losing facility will be assigned in order of selection. In the event more than one (1) employee is selected for the same facility, release dates shall be determined in order of receipt of the ERR/Merit Promotion Program (MPP) package at the servicing HR office. Any deviations from this provision will be handled in accordance with paragraph B or C of this Agreement, as appropriate.

I. An employee from a facility that does not meet the criteria established in

paragraph A of this Section, but has been selected in accordance with the MPP process, will be issued a release date utilizing provisions of Section 13 B or C.

J. In the event a facility moves from a Category 2 release window to a Category

1 release window, employees with Category 2 release dates will be afforded the opportunity to have their existing release dates adjusted to comply with the Category 1 release window, prior to the issuance of subsequent release dates.

K. Once the release date has been established, it may only be changed by mutual agreement of the employee and the losing/gaining Air Traffic Managers, as long as the release date falls within the National Release Policy.

L. TRANSITIONAL PROVISION: Prior to the issuance of the initial release dates under this Section, all existing release dates will be reviewed for compliance with the National Release Policy. Facilities that meet the National Release Policy criteria will offer its employees the opportunity to have their


existing release dates adjusted to comply with the National Release Policy. Facilities that do not meet the National Release Policy criteria will honor existing release dates.

Section 2. Article 60, Section 2 of the 2009 Collective Bargaining Agreement shall be replaced as follows:

Section 2. Eligible employees shall be given priority consideration within the same bargaining unit for any ingrade/downgrade bargaining unit vacancy at any of those facilities for which he/she is qualified. Release dates are subject to the provisions of the National Release Policy as defined in Article 42 of this Agreement. Employees will be afforded the opportunity to utilize their priority consideration status when their facility meets the criteria established in Article 42 Section 13 (A) of this Agreement.

Section 3. A collaborative national team, the National Centralized ERR Process Team (NCEPT), is established to conduct the ERR placement process in accordance with the ERR SOP. The Union may designate up to (2) representatives to the NCEPT. The NCEPT will meet at least once per quarter, or more frequently as determined by the NCEPT, to conduct the ERR placement process. The Agency will provide the NATCA representatives to the NCEPT with all information and data necessary to participate in NCEPT meetings Section 4. The Parties agree that all ERRs submitted pursuant to Article 42 of the Parties’ 2009 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) will be processed in accordance with the National Centralized ERR Placement Process SOP dated November 4, 2015 (Attachment 1). The CPC Staffing Levels, adopted by the Agency and attached to the SOP, will be used as a basis to guide Agency placement decisions, but do not guarantee ERR placement/selection. The Parties will continue their work on refining the models and once completed, the output of those models will supersede the attached CPC Staffing Levels. Section 5. Once selected into a facility, a candidate will no longer be considered for a facility of lesser need during that ERR placement session. Section 6. Facility certified CPC’s shall be considered for placement prior to other employees during the ERR placement process. Employees in training that have never achieved CPC status will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Section 7. The Parties at the National level agree to review the effectiveness of this Agreement quarterly. Based upon this review, the Parties agree to meet and jointly make modifications as necessary to ensure the goals of this Agreement continue to be met. The Parties shall utilize a mutually agreed upon mediator to assist in resolving any disputes regarding modifications sought by either party. At the conclusion of mediation, if the Parties remain unable to reach agreement on necessary modifications, either Party may

cancel this agreement by providing the other party thi1ty (30) days advance notice. In the event this Agreement is cancelled, the provisions of the 2009 CBA amended by this agreement shall return to the language as existed on October 1, 2009.

Section 8. This Agreement shall remain in effect for the duration of the Parties' 2009 CBA and may be extended by mutual agreement,

Signed this 4th day of November 2015.

For the Union:

'-Q ;s:-----.. Dean lacopelli

Phil Barbarella

For the Agency:

ERR/SOP /Release Policy MOU- CORRECTED of5

ERR SOP Page 1 of 5

National Centralized ERR Placement Process

Standard Operating Procedure

Air Traffic Organization

DATE: November 4, 2015 Version.1.0

ERR SOP Page 2 of 5

1.0 Purpose This document outlines the standard operating procedure (SOP) for the National Centralized Employee Requested Reassignment (ERR) selection and placement process for employees covered by the 2009 FAA/NATCA collective bargaining agreement (CBA). This is the sole process for the evaluation and approval/disapproval of ERRs from bargaining unit employees desiring consideration for placement to positions covered by the CBA. The goal of this process is to facilitate more timely releases of employees requesting transfer, while seeking to improve the distribution of the workforce. This process was developed in collaboration with the National Air Traffic Controllers Association. All ERR requests will be processed by the National Centralized ERR Process Team (NCEPT) in accordance with this SOP. 2.0 Background In September 2012, an FAA/NATCA Collaborative Resource Workgroup (CRWG or Workgroup) was established to “review, revise or improve data-based, operational models for the distribution of air traffic control specialists throughout air traffic control facilities.” As the Workgroup began to analyze the staffing distribution among air traffic facilities produced by the facility specific Staffing Standards (as derived, in part, from the Grant Thornton and MITRE models), it determined that a more comprehensive review was required, and that any resulting changes would require a significantly longer timeframe than was desired. In order to allow for swifter action and in accordance with the attached Agreement dated October 17, 2014, the workgroup collaboratively developed interim Certified Professional Controller (CPC) staffing levels for use until the comprehensive review of the models is complete. In developing the interim CPC levels, the group surveyed each facility to obtain their assessment of the number of positions requiring staffing on their 90th percentile busiest air traffic day. In addition, the group considered various factors, including each facility’s hours of operation, historical time-on-position, current staffing levels, and overtime usage. The interim CPC levels were circulated back to the field facility Air Traffic Managers and NATCA Facility Representatives, as well as the Directors of Operations and the NATCA Regional Vice Presidents, with the objective of identifying any significant concerns. The feedback received was considered and adjustments made when warranted. The interim CPC staffing levels (attached) hereinafter referred to, as the “CPC Staffing Levels.” will be used, as a basis to guide Agency placement decisions until the CRWG completes the comprehensive model review is complete. Once completed, the output of the models will guide Agency placement decisions and will supersede the interim CPC staffing levels.

ERR SOP Page 3 of 5

3.0 Procedures/Process: 3.1. General: 3.1.1. The staffing workbook will be updated continuously by field air traffic control

(ATC) facilities. 3.1.2. The CPC Staffing Levels will be used as a basis to guide Agency placement

decisions, but do not guarantee ERR placement/selection. 3.1.3. The NCEPT is comprised of representatives from ASG, AJG, AJT, AHR and

NATCA. The Union may designate up to (2) representatives to the National Centralized ERR Process Team (NCEPT). The Agency will provide the NATCA representatives to the NCEPT with all information and data necessary to participate in NCEPT meetings. The NCEPT will meet quarterly, unless agreed to otherwise by the team.

3.1.4. The need to utilize Merit Promotion Program (MPP) bids for bargaining unit positions will be determined at the end of an ERR placement cycle.

3.1.5. The NCEPT AJT management official will be designated as the deciding/approving official for ERR placements and utilization of MPP bids for bargaining unit positions.

3.2. Facilities will be prioritized based on a collaboratively developed formula (the Decision Lens software) that considers the following: a. Criticality to the National Airspace System; b. Facility health (projected staffing); and c. Whether or not considered a hard to staff facility.

3.2.1.The formula will be incorporated into the National Priority Placement Tool. 3.3. Generate National ERR List. 3.3.1. AHR will ensure all ERRs received are entered into the Staffing Workbook ERR

database. 3.3.2. Management Services (AJG) will sort the national ERR list by facility. 3.3.3. Service Area Administrative Services Group (ASG) will screen the lists to ensure

candidates are eligible and forward the ERR lists of current CPCs to facilities for prioritization, if there are more requests than slots at that facility.

3.4. Prioritize Candidates. 3.4.1. If applicable, facilities will prioritize all candidates and return their lists to ASG

within five (5) business days. Prioritized lists are for reference purposes only. “Priority Placement” and “Priority Consideration” qualified candidates shall be handled in accordance with the CBA and applicable MOUs.

3.4.2. Facility certified CPC’s shall be considered for placement prior to other employees during the ERR placement process. Employees in training that have never achieved CPC status will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

ERR SOP Page 4 of 5

3.5. Conduct ERR Placement: 3.5.1. Begin the placement process with the facility of highest need as determined by the

Decision Lens tool and executed by the National Priority Placement Tool. 3.5.2. Utilize the facility-prioritized list to identify candidates for potential placement

slots when the list of candidates is greater than number of slots. 3.5.3. No selections will be made from facilities that would cause the Current and

Projected CPC Actual On-Board (AOB) for the losing facility to drop below the CPC AOB national average.

3.5.4. Once selected into a facility, a candidate will no longer be considered for a facility of lesser need during that ERR placement session.

3.5.5. The National Priority Placement Tool will be updated with each ERR placement and the facility prioritization will be recalculated at the conclusion of each NCEPT meeting.

3.6. Initiate Tentative Offer Letter (TOL) 3.6.1. AJG will forward facility selections through the ASG to AHR for processing of the

TOLs. 3.6.2. AHR will issue TOLs to selected employees within two (2) weeks of receipt of the

facility selections. 3.6.3. The TOL will provide the release date window in accordance with the National

Release Policy.

3.7. Acceptance/Declination of Offer 3.7.1. AHR will update the Staffing Workbook with accepted/declined offers and

associated report dates, as appropriate. 3.7.2. An employee who accepts a TOL will be provided with a Firm Offer Letter (FOL),

pending medical and security clearance, if applicable. 3.7.3. In accordance with AHR Operating Procedures, Internal Tentative and Firm Job

Offer Process, upon receipt of the verbal acceptance of the tentative offer by the ATCS, AHR will send an email to the gaining and losing ATMs notifying them the offer was accepted and request the ATMs establish the release date in accordance with the National Release Policy.

3.7.4. Releases will be effectuated as soon as practical in accordance with the National Release Policy.

4.0 Procedures for ATCS Temporary FLM Promotions within a Facility 4.1.1. Staffing Workbook data and the attached authorized CPC and FLM staffing levels for each facility will be used to determine the percentage of on-board employees compared to authorized employees in each category. The percentages will be recalculated with each selection. 4.1.2. Temporary FLM promotions of ATCS bargaining unit employees within a facility must be approved in advance by the office of the Vice President of Air Traffic Services (VP-ATS) if the percentage of on-board facility CPC to the facility authorized CPC staffing level is less than or equal to 90%. 4.1.3. Temporary FLM promotions of ATCS bargaining unit employees within a facility do not require advance approval by the office of the Vice President of Air Traffic

ERR SOP Page 5 of 5

Services (VP-ATS) if the percentage of on-board facility CPC to the facility authorized CPC staffing level is greater than 90%. 4.1.4. Temporary FLM promotions of ATCS bargaining unit employees within a facility do not require advance approval by the office of the Vice President of Air Traffic Services (VP-ATS) if the ratio of actual on board FLM’s to authorized is less than the CPC ratio of actual on board to authorized. 4.1.5. Temporary FLM promotions of ATCS bargaining unit employees within a facility that allow for conversion to a permanent FLM position will be handled in accordance with the provisions of the National Release Policy. 5.0 Definitions and Terms

Standard Operating Procedure SOP Collective Bargaining Agreement CBA National Air Traffic Controllers Association NATCA Air Traffic Manager ATM Air Traffic Services ATS Director of Operations DO Air Traffic Control Specialists ATCS Administrative Services Group ASG Knowledge Sharing Network KSN Criteria Vacancy Tool CVT Point of Contact POC Federal Personnel Payroll System FPPS Employee Movement Tracking Database EMDT Air Traffic Control Tower ATCT Human Resources AHR Quota Management & Resource Tool QMART Central Service Center CST Vice President VP Eastern Service Center EST Western Service Center WST National Centralized ERR Process Team

NCEPT

Facility ID Region Facility Name Type Level

CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

A11 NAL Anchorage TRACON 2 8 24 4A80 NSO Atlanta Tracon 2 12 102 15A90 NNE Boston TRACON 2 11 55 12ABE NEA Allentown Tower 3 7 30 4ABI NSW Abilene Tower 3 6 20 4ABQ NSW Albuquerque Tower 3 8 22 4ACK NNE Nantucket Tower 7 6 11 2ACT NSW Waco Tower 3 5 22 3ACY NEA Atlantic City Tower 3 7 26 4ADS NSW Addison Tower 7 5 11 2ADW NEA Andrews Tower 7 6 15 4AFW NSW Alliance Tower 7 5 15 2AGC NEA Allegheny Tower 7 5 15 2AGS NSO Augusta Tower 3 5 15 3ALB NEA Albany Tower 3 7 28 4ALO NCE Waterloo Tower 3 5 13 2AMA NSW Amarillo Tower 3 6 22 4ANC NAL Anchorage Tower 7 8 26 4APA NNM Centennial Tower 7 8 22 3APC NWP Napa Tower 7 4 9 1ARB NGL Ann Arbor Tower 7 5 9 2ARR NGL Aurora Tower 7 5 11 2ASE NNM Aspen TRACAB 3 5 15 1ATL NSO Atlanta Tower 7 12 47 9AUS NSW Austin Tower 3 8 38 6AVL NSO Asheville Tower 3 6 17 3AVP NEA Wilkes-Barre Tower 3 5 20 3AZO NGK Kalamazoo Tower 3 6 22 3BDL NNE Bradley Tower 7 6 15 2BED NNE Hanscom Tower 7 7 17 2BFI NNM Boeing Tower 7 7 19 4BFL NWP Bakersfield Tower 3 7 22 3BGM NEA Binghamton Tower 3 5 15 2BGR NNE Bangor Tower 3 5 22 3BHM NSO Birmingham Tower 3 8 30 4BIL NNM Billings Tower 3 6 22 3BIS NGL Bismarck TRACAB 3 5 13 2BJC NNM Broomfield Tower 7 6 11 2BNA NSO Nashville Tower 3 9 39 6


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

BOI NNM Boise Tower 3 7 30 4BOS NNE Boston Tower 7 10 30 5BPT NSW Beaumont Tower 7 4 11 1BTR NSW Baton Rouge Tower 3 7 22 3BTV NNE Burlington Tower 3 6 22 3BUF NEA Buffalo Tower 3 8 30 4BUR NWP Burbank Tower 7 7 22 3BWI NEA Baltimore Tower 7 9 22 4C90 NGL Chicago TRACON 2 12 100 15CAE NSO Columbia Tower 3 6 22 4CAK NGL Akron-Canton Tower 3 7 17 4CCR NWP Concord Tower 7 5 11 1CDW NEA Caldwell Tower 7 5 11 2CHA NSO Chatanooga Tower 3 6 20 3CHS NSO Charleston Tower 3 8 22 4CID NCE Cedar Rapids Tower 3 6 17 2CKB NEA Clarksburg Tower 3 5 17 2CLE NGL Cleveland Tower 3 9 39 5CLT NSO Charlotte Tower 3 12 83 12CMA NWP Camarillo Tower 7 6 11 2CMH NGL Columbus Tower 3 9 41 5CMI NGL Champaign Tower 3 6 17 3CNO NWP Chino Tower 7 7 11 2COS NNM Colorado Springs Tower 3 8 24 4CPR NNM Casper Tower 3 5 13 2CPS NGL Downtown Tower 7 5 11 2CRP NSW Corpus Christi Tower 3 9 34 7CRQ NWP Palomar Tower 7 6 11 2CRW NEA Charleston Tower 3 6 22 3CSG NSO Columbus Tower 7 4 7 0CVG NSO Cincinnati Tower 3 9 43 11D01 NNM Denver TRACON 2 12 89 9D10 NSW Dallas-Ft Worth TRACON 2 12 93 16D21 NGL Detroit TRACON 2 11 58 10DAB NSO Daytona Beach Tower 3 9 58 7DAL NSW Dallas Love Tower 7 8 24 4DAY NGL Dayton Tower 7 5 15 2DCA NEA Washington National 7 10 28 6DEN NNM Denver Tower 7 12 39 9


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

DFW NSW Dallas-Fort Worth Tower 7 12 57 10DLH NGL Duluth Tower 3 6 22 2DPA NGL Dupage Tower 7 5 15 2DSM NCE Des Moines Tower 3 7 22 4DTW NGL Detroit Tower 7 11 34 6DVT NWP Deer Valley Tower 7 8 19 3DWH NSW Houston Hooks Tower 7 7 13 2E10 NWP High Desert TRACON 6 8 24 4ELM NEA Elmira TRACAB 3 5 13 2ELP NSW El Paso Tower 3 7 26 3EMT NWP El Monte Tower 7 5 11 2ERI NEA Erie Tower 3 5 17 2EUG NNM Eugene Tower 3 6 22 3EVV NGL Evansville Tower 3 6 17 3EWR NEA Newark Tower 7 11 34 6F11 NSO Central Florida TRACON 2 11 39 9FAI NAL Fairbanks Tower 3 7 22 4FAR NGL Fargo Tower 3 6 17 3FAT NWP Fresno Tower 3 8 28 4FAY NSO Fayetteville Tower 3 7 22 4FCM NGL Flying Cloud Tower 7 5 11 2FFZ NWP Falcon Tower 7 7 13 2FLL NSO Fort Lauderdale Tower 7 8 26 4FLO NSO Florence Tower 3 5 13 2FNT NGL Flint Tower 3 5 13 2FPR NSO St Lucie Tower 7 6 11 2FRG NEA Farmingdale Tower 7 7 13 2FSD NCE Sioux Falls Tower 3 6 17 3FSM NSW Fort Smith Tower 3 7 30 4FTW NSW Meacham Tower 7 5 15 2FWA NGL Fort Wayne Tower 3 6 22 3FXE NSO Fort Lauderdale Ex Tower 7 6 15 2GCN NWP Grand Canyon Tower 7 5 9 1GEG NNM Spokane Tower 3 7 28 4GFK NGL Grand Forks Tower 7 9 22 4GGG NSW Longview Tower 3 6 22 3GPT NSO Gulfport Tower 3 7 17 3GRB NGL Green Bay Tower 3 6 20 3GRR NGL Grand Rapids Tower 3 7 22 4


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

GSO NSO Greensboro Tower 3 7 26 4GSP NSO Greer Tower 3 7 22 3GTF NGL Great Falls Tower 3 5 17 2HCF NWP Honolulu Control Facility 6 11 83 13HEF NEA Manassas Tower 7 5 11 2HIO NNM Hillsboro Tower 7 7 17 3HLN NNM Helena Tower 4 5 10 2HOU NSW Hobby Tower 7 8 20 4HPN NEA Westchester Tower 7 7 15 2HSV NSO Huntsville Tower 3 7 17 3HTS NEA Huntington Tower 3 5 20 2HUF NGL Terre Haute Tower 3 5 17 2HWD NWP Hayward Tower 7 6 11 2I90 NSW Houston TRACON 2 12 93 14IAD NEA Dulles Tower 7 10 30 5IAH NS Houston Intl Tower 7 12 34 8ICT NCE Wichita Tower 3 8 28 4ILG NEA Wilmington Tower 7 5 11 2ILM NSO Wilmington Tower 3 6 22 3IND NGL Indianapolis Tower 3 8 36 5ISP NEA Islip Tower 7 6 17 2ITO NWP Hilo TRACAB 3 6 13 2JAN NSO Jackson Tower 3 7 17 3JAX NSO Jacksonville Tower 3 9 47 7JFK NEA Kennedy Tower 7 11 34 6JNU NAL Juneau Tower 7 5 13 2K90 NNE Cape TRACON 2 7 22 3L30 NWP Las Vegas TRACON 2 11 39 9LAF NGL Lafayette Tower 1 4 9 1LAN NGL Lansing Tower 3 6 22 3LAS NWP Las Vegas Tower 7 11 36 7LAX NWP Los Angeles Tower 7 11 43 9LBB NSW Lubbock Tower 3 6 17 3LCH NSW Lake Charles Tower 3 6 17 2LEX NSO Lexington Tower 3 7 24 3LFT NSW Lafayette Tower 3 6 22 3LGA NEA La Guardia Tower 7 11 34 6LGB NWP Long Beach Tower 7 8 22 3LIT NSW Little Rock Tower 3 8 28 4


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

LNK NCE Lincoln Tower 7 5 11 2LOU NSO Louisville Bowman Tower 7 5 11 2LVK NWP Livermore Tower 7 6 11 2M03 NSO Memphis TRACON 2 9 28 7M98 NGL Minneapolis TRACON 2 11 55 9MAF NSW Midland Tower 3 7 17 4MBS NGL Saginaw Tower 3 5 13 2MCI NCE Kansas City Tower 3 9 39 5MCO NSO Orlando Tower 7 9 22 5MDT NEA Harrisburg Intl Tower 3 7 26 4MDW NGL Midway Tower 7 8 22 4MEM NSO Memphis Tower 7 9 28 6MFD NGL Mansfield Tower 3 5 17 2MGM NSO Montgomery Tower 3 7 21 3MHT NNE Manchester Tower 7 5 15 2MIA NSO Miami Tower 3 12 91 13MIC NGL Crystal Tower 7 4 11 2MKC NCE Kansas City Tower 7 5 15 2MKE NGL Milwaukee Tower 3 9 39 7MKG NGL Muskegon Tower 3 5 17 2MLI NGL Moline Quad City Tower 3 5 20 2MLU NSW Monroe Tower 3 5 15 2MMU NEA Morristown Tower 7 5 11 2MOB NSO Mobile Tower 3 8 22 3MRI NAL Merrill Tower 7 6 11 2MRY NWP Monterey Tower 7 5 9 1MSN NGL Madison Tower 3 7 17 4MSP NGL Minneapolis Tower 7 11 36 6MSY NSW Moiusantt Tower 3 9 36 5MWH NNM Grant County Tower 3 6 15 2MYF NWP Montgomery Tower 7 7 13 2MYR NSO Myrtle Beach Tower 3 7 22 3N90 NEA New York TRACON 9 12 226 36NCT NWP Northern California TRACON 2 12 161 35NEW NSW Lakefront Tower 7 5 11 1NMM NSO Meridian TRACON 2 7 13 2OAK NWP Oakland Tower 7 7 24 5OGG NWP Kahului Tower 7 6 13 2OKC NSW Oklahoma City Tower 3 8 30 4


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

OMA NCE Omaha Tower 7 6 15 2ONT NWP Ontario Tower 7 5 15 3ORD NGL Chicago O'hare Tower 7 12 68 14ORF NEA Norfolk Tower 3 8 28 6ORL NSO Orlando Executive Tower 7 5 11 2P31 NSO Pensacola TRACON 2 9 36 4P50 NWP Phoenix TRACON 2 11 60 10P80 NNM Portland TRACON 2 9 26 4PAE NNM Paine Tower 7 6 11 2PAO NWP Palo Alto Tower 7 6 11 2PBI NSO West Palm Beach Tower 3 9 43 5PCT NEA Potomac TRACON 9 11 174 34PDK NSO Dekalb - Peachtree Tower 7 7 15 2PDX NNM Portland Tower 7 8 26 3PHF NEA Patrick Henry Tower 7 6 11 2PHL NEA Philadelphia Tower 3 12 72 12PHX NWP Phoenix Tower 7 10 28 6PIA NGL Peoria Tower 3 6 22 3PIE NSO St Petersburg Tower 7 6 11 2PIT NEA Pittsburgh Tower 3 9 36 8PNE NEA Northeast Philadelphia Tower 7 5 11 2PNS NSO Pensacola Tower 7 6 11 2POC NWP Brackett Tower 7 5 11 2POU NEA Poughkeepsie Tower 7 5 10 1PRC NWP Prescott Tower 7 7 15 2PSC NNM Pasco Tower 3 6 20 2PSP NWP Palm Springs Tower 7 5 11 2PTK NGL Pontiac Tower 7 5 11 2PUB NNM Pueblo Tower 7 7 15 2PVD NNE Providence Tower 3 7 30 4PWK NGL Palwaukee Tower 7 5 11 2PWM NNE Portland Tower 3 6 22 3R90 NCE Omaha TRACON 2 8 20 4RDG NEA Reading TRACAB 3 6 17 2RDU NSO Raleigh-Durham Tower 3 9 43 6RFD NGL Rockford Tower 3 6 22 3RHV NWP Reid-Hillview Tower 7 6 13 2RIC NEA Richmond Tower 7 6 15 2RNO NWP Reno Tower 7 5 15 3


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

ROA NEA Roanoke Tower 3 6 24 4ROC NEA Rochester Tower 3 7 26 4ROW NSW Roswell Tower 3 5 15 2RST NGL Rochester Municipal TRACAB 3 5 13 2RSW NSO Fort Myers Tower 3 8 30 3RVS NSW Riverside Tower 7 7 13 2S46 NNM Seattle TRACON 2 10 43 7S56 NNM Salt Lake City TRACON 2 10 45 8SAN NWP San Diego Tower 7 7 26 3SAT NSW San Antonio Tower 3 9 45 7SAV NSO Savannah Tower 3 8 23 3SBA NWP Santa Barbara Tower 3 7 28 4SBN NGL South Bend Tower 3 7 26 4SCK NWP Stockton Tower 7 4 11 1SCT NWP Southern California TRACON 9 12 233 37SDF NSO Standiford Tower 3 8 47 6SDL NWP Scottsdale Tower 7 6 11 2SEA NNM Seattle Tower 7 9 26 5SEE NWP Gillespie Tower 7 7 15 2SFB NSO Sanford Tower 7 8 17 3SFO NWP San Francisco Tower 7 10 30 6SGF NCE Springfield Tower 3 7 29 4SHV NSW Shreveport Tower 3 6 26 4SJC NWP San Jose Tower 7 6 13 3SJU NSO San Juan Tower 7 7 17 3SLC NNM Salt Lake City Tower 7 10 32 5SMF NWP Sacramento Tower 7 6 15 2SMO NWP Santa Monica Tower 7 6 15 2SNA NWP John Wayne Tower 7 8 22 4SPI NGL Springfield Tower 3 5 13 2SRQ NSO Sarasota Tower 7 6 13 2STL NCE St Louis Tower 7 8 17 4STP NGL St Paul Tower 7 5 11 2STS NWP Sonoma Tower 7 5 9 1STT NSO St Thomas Tower 7 5 11 1SUS NCE Spirit Tower 7 5 11 2SUX NCE Sioux Gateway Tower 3 5 15 2SYR NEA Syracuse Tower 3 6 22 4T75 NCE St Louis TRACON 2 9 26 5


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

TEB NEA Teterboro Tower 7 7 20 3TLH NSO Tallahassee Tower 3 7 17 3TMB NSO Tamiami Tower 7 7 17 2TOA NWP Torrance Tower 7 6 11 2TOL NGL Toledo Tower 3 6 24 3TPA NSO Tampa Tower 3 10 53 10TRI NGL Tri-Cities Tower 3 6 17 3TUL NSW Tulsa Tower 3 8 30 4TUS NWP Tucson Tower 7 7 17 3TVC NGL Traverse City Tower 7 5 9 2TWF NGL Twin Falls Tower 4 5 9 1TYS NSO Knoxville Tower 3 7 28 4U90 NWP Tucson TRACON 2 8 17 3VGT NWP North Las Vegas Tower 7 6 11 2VNY NWP Van Nuys Tower 7 8 24 3VRB NSO Vero Beach Tower 7 7 11 2Y90 NNE Yankee TRACON 2 8 22 4YIP NGL Willow Run Tower 7 5 15 2

YNG NGL Youngstown 3 5 17 3ZAB NSW ALBUQUERQUE ARTCC 8 10 180 34ZAN NAL ANCHORAGE ARTCC 8 10 98 20ZAU NGL CHICAGO ARTCC 8 12 321 51ZBW NNE BOSTON ARTCC 8 11 203 34ZDC NEA WASHINGTON ARTCC 8 12 305 40ZDV NNM DENVER ARTCC 8 10 258 40ZFW NSW FORT WORTH ARTCC 8 12 290 39ZHU NSW HOUSTON ARTCC 8 11 277 40ZID NGL INDIANAPOLIS ARTCC 8 12 296 46ZJX NSO JACKSONVILLE ARTCC 8 11 241 40ZKC NCE KANSAS CITY ARTCC 8 11 214 40ZLA NWP LOS ANGELES ARTCC 8 12 245 40ZLC NNM SALT LAKE CITY ARTCC 8 10 150 27ZMA NSO MIAMI ARTCC 8 11 267 40ZME NSO MEMPHIS ARTCC 8 12 264 40ZMP NGL MINNEAPOLIS ARTCC 8 11 256 40ZNY NEA NEW YORK ARTCC 8 12 296 40ZOA NWP OAKLAND ARTCC 8 11 207 34ZOB NGL CLEVELAND ARTCC 8 12 313 52ZSE NNM SEATTLE ARTCC 8 10 165 27


CRWG CPC

Staffing Level

FLM Staffing Level

ZSU NSO SAN JUAN CERAP CCF 8 9 62 12ZTL NSO ATLANTA ARTCC 8 12 349 46ZUA NWP GUAM CERAP ARTCC 8 9 17 5

memorandum of understanding between the national … however, the office of the vp-ats will notify...

Documents