mental health services act steering committee
DESCRIPTION
Mental Health Services Act Steering Committee. July 7, 2008 1:00 – 4:00. Consumer Perspective. MHSA Newsletter: Recovery Connections. MHSA Participation. By Tho Be. Kites: By Margarita Noguera. Mark Refowitz. Local/State Updates. Kate Pavich. MHSA/Capital Facilities Update. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Mental Health Services ActSteering Committee
July 7, 20081:00 – 4:00
2
Consumer Perspective
MHSA Newsletter:Recovery Connections
3
4
MHSA Participation
By Tho Be
5
Kites: By Margarita Noguera
6
Mark Refowitz
Local/State Updates
7
Kate Pavich
MHSA/Capital Facilities Update
8
9
1. Framework and Goal Support Briefly describe how the County
plans to use Capital Facilities and/or Technological Needs Component funds to support the programs, services and goals implemented through the MHSA
10
Allowable Costs To purchase a building for use as a wellness
and recovery center and office space
To purchase a building where vocational, educational and recreational services are provided and where the County is the owner of record
To purchase a building for short-term crisis residential care to avoid hospitalization and allow for a quick return to the family/community
11
County Property:401 S. Tustin Avenue, Orange
12
New Facilities Crisis Residential program to serve as an
alternative to hospitalization for acute and chronic mentally ill persons
Wellness/Peer Support Center to offer clients assistance with benefits, socialization, self-reliance, and recovery
Vocational Training to provide education and employment support to consumers and their families
13
Tustin Avenue Campus Three 7,500 square foot buildings
Green belts, walkways, and outdoor activity areas
Architects to incorporate “green” construction including lighting, flooring, building materials, transportation and use of recycling
14
1. Framework and Goal Support
Briefly describe how you derived the proposed distribution of funds
15
Split of Allocation
80% Capital Facilities 20% Technology ($22.6 million) ($5.6 million)
16
2. Stakeholder Involvement Provide a description of stakeholder
involvement in identification of the County’s Capital Facilities and/or Technological Needs Component priorities along with a short summary of the Community Program Planning Process and any substantive recommendations and/or changes as a result of the stakeholder process.
17
Stakeholder Process Training and workshops from local and
national experts on system transformation, recovery-based planning, and creating a recovery culture
Consumer Action Advisory Committee advises MHSA Office on development of programs; participated in eleven meetings regarding capital facilities and technology; toured the Tustin facility and unanimously supported the development of the site for MHSA programs
18
Wellness Center Planning Committee
Identified a list of components that shouldbe included in a wellness recovery center
Nourishing culture Green facility A safe place that is non-discriminatory Peer staffing Advisory board made up of at least
51% consumers
19
Steering Committee 62 member committee composed of
community members, consumers, and family members that represent a diverse cross-section of the community – reviewed 6 presentations on Capital Facilities and Technological Needs
20
Stakeholder Meetings Workforce Education and Training (WET)
meetings discussed using the property for a Recovery Education Institute and a vocational training program
Capital Facilities and Technology Advisory Board met regarding programs to be housed on the property, creating a timeline, and determining the spilt of funds
Mental Health Board presentations and Public Hearing
21
3. Capital Facilities NeedsNorth Orange County – 401 S. Tustin
Centrally located with easy access for public transportation
Has Conditional Use Permit to allow residential program on site
Property can accommodate three 7,500 sq. ft. buildings with green belts and outdoor activity areas
South Orange County – to be determined
22
4. Technological Needs Electronic Health Record (EHR) – plans to
implement an EHR “lite” system
By end of 2008 will have accomplished the Practice Management phase with the implementation of scheduling.
Build the Clinical Data Management component to create clinical assessments, treatment plans, and progress notes on line.
23
Component Proposal TimelineActivity Date
30-Day Public Comment Period
June 6 – July 6, 2008
Mental Health Board/ Public Hearing
July 10, 2008
Board of Supervisors Meeting
July 15, 2008
Send Proposal to DMH End of July, 2008
Department of Mental Health Approval
August/September, 2008
24
Project Schedule Feasibility Study
Phase
Programming Phase: data collection/staff interviews
Schematic Design Phase: preliminary design development drawings
25
Alan Albright
Prevention and Early Intervention Coordinator
26
Develop universal and selective interventions and programs to help prevent the development of serious emotional or behavioral disorders and mental illness.
Provide “short–duration”, “low-intensity” interventions to avoid more extensive mental health services or to prevent a mental health problem from getting worse.
Create PEI interventions that are distinct from Community Services and Support services.
Engage persons prior to the development of SMI or SED.
Alleviate the need for additional mental health treatment and/or transition to extended mental health treatment.
Through the Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) component, the MHSA provides funding to:
27
KEY TO TRANSFORMATION: HELP FIRST
“To facilitate accessing supports at the earliest possible signs of mental health problems and concerns, PEI builds capacity for providing mental health early intervention services at sites where people go for other routine activities (e.g., health, education, community organizations).”
(DMH PEI Guidelines Sept. 2007, page 2)
28
PEI PROJECTS
Each PEI project should be designed to address one or more PEI Key Community Mental Health Need: • Disparities in Access to Mental health Services • Psychosocial Impact of Trauma
• At-Risk Children, Youth, and Young Adult Populations• Stigma and Discrimination
• Suicide Risk and one or more PEI Priority Population:
• Underserved Cultural Populations • Individuals Experiencing the Onset of Serious
Psychiatric Illness• Trauma Exposed• Children/Youth in Stressed Families
• Children/Youth at Risk of School Failure • Children/Youth at Risk of Juvenile Justice Involvement
29
PEI PRIORITY AGE
PEI County Plans will address all age groups, however, a minimum of 51% of the overall County PEI budget must be dedicated to individuals who are between the ages of 0-25.
30
NON-SUPPLANTATION
Funds must be used for programs authorized in Section 5892 of the W&I Code.
Funds cannot be used to replace other state or county funds required to be used to provide mental health services in fiscal year 2004-05 (the time of enactment of the MHSA).
Funds must be used on programs that were not in existence in the county at the time of enactment of the MHSA (new programs) or to expand the capacity of existing services that were being provided at the time of enactment of the MHSA (11/02/04).
31
ALLOWABLE EXPENSES
Personnel (such as mental health professionals, culturally/linguistically competent family liaisons, program managers)
Operating costs (such as curricula and other educational materials, supplies, travel, equipment and facilities rental)
Subcontracts (such as professional services for training or program evaluation)
32
NON-ALLOWABLE EXPENSES Filling gaps in treatment and recovery services for
individuals who have been diagnosed with a serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance Capital projects or housing Technology projects Workforce Education and Training activities (as described in
the Workforce Education and Training Component – Proposed Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Guidelines) in the following categories:
Mental Health Career Pathway Programs Residency, Internship Programs Financial Incentive Programs
Broad social marketing campaigns (State-administered projects will support this activity)
Development of new training curricula (State-administered projects will support this activity)
33
ORANGE COUNTY’S PEI PLANNING PROCESS
Community Information http://www.ochealthinfo.com/mhsa/pei/
Community Input: Regional Focus Groups and Stakeholder Meetings Community and Organizational Surveys
Recommended Planning Partners Underserved Communities Education Client and Family Member Organizations Mental Health Providers Health Social Services Law Enforcement
34
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER PRIORITIES
Ten most frequently identified PEI program/service needs:1. Culturally competent outreach/engagement, care
coordination, information/referral, follow-up assistance, consultation targeting at-risk populations (e.g., 211/mobile/senior center I&R/”Friendly Visitor”, ER/hospital, MD-based, etc.)
2. PEI/mental health early intervention/counseling/ support groups/substance abuse/trauma resources for children, teens, parents, care givers, spouses, seniors, military families in community/home-based, school, primary care, and culturally competent settings.
3. Culturally competent PEI/mental health training/ education for professionals (schools, health, law enf., faith-based, SSA, caregivers, etc.)
35
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER PRIORITIES
4. Community information / education / training / stigma reduction campaigns (culturally competent media / community / web-based)
5. Community-based assessment/ screening /early identification at various service sites for all individuals / ages
6. Volunteer / mentor / peer counselor resources for children, TAY, adults, parents, and seniors
36
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER PRIORITIES
7. School-based PEI / mental health / family-focused resources (screening / early identification, PBIS, SARB resources, etc.)
8. PEI-focused / community-based socialization, after school, arts, recreational, life skills, nutritional resources, etc.
9. Culturally competent parenting resources, classes, education, information
10. OC-based suicide hotline, crisis services, warm line services, resources
37
•
PPRREEVVEENNTTIIOONN && EEAARRLLYY IINNTTEERRVVEENNTTIIOONN PPLLAANNNNIINNGG AANNDD AAPPPPRROOVVAALL PPRROOCCEESSSS
Community
and Stakeholder
Input
MHSA Steering
Committee
PEI Sub-
Committee
Project Workgroup
30-Day Public
Review of PEI Plan
Mental Health Board Public
Hearing
County Board of
Supervisors
Approved PEI Plan
State Dept. of Mental Health
MHS Oversight and Accountability
Commission
Project Workgroup
Project Workgroup
Etc.
38
Next Steps
39
Kimari Phillips
Community & Organizational Surveys
Involving OC MH Consumers & Providers in the
Prevention & Early InterventionPlanning Process
40
Data Collection Methods Surveys (online & printed)
Organizational Community (Spanish, Vietnamese, English)
Stakeholder Meetings
Focus Groups
41
Survey Measures A collaborative team from OCHCA’s:
Behavioral Health Services Quality Mgmt – Planning & Research
Two comprehensive surveys for OC: Organizational Providers Community/Consumers
42
Survey Dissemination Mailed over 3,000 surveys to OC
organizations and community members
Handed out over 5,000 surveys throughout OC at meetings, clinics, community based organizations, etc.
E-mailed announcements regarding the online surveys (including a hyperlink for easy access)
43
Mail & E-mail Distribution: CBOs & Family/Senior Resource Centers City & County Offices Law Enforcement & Legal Services Educational Institutions Faith-based Organizations Financial Institutions & Foundations Housing & Transportation Agencies Medical, Mental Health, & Social Services Utility Companies & Media
44
Surveys Received to DateCommunity (n = 1,329)
78% Print (n = 1035) 22% Online (n = 294)
85.5% English (n = 1136) 11.4% Spanish (n = 152) 3.1% Vietnamese (n = 41)
Organizational (n = 380) 74% Print (n = 281) 26% Online (n = 99)
45
General Types of Respondents MH Providers/Advocates
Non-MH Providers & Other Government Agencies
Interested Community Members and MH Consumers
46
Information Gathered from OC Community Members/Consumers
Satisfaction with amount & accessibility of PEI services in OC
Demographic info (age, gender, race/ethnicity, annual household income, ZIP code)
Opinions regarding: Populations in greatest need of PEI in OC Priority PEI issues in OC communities Most effective settings for identifying OC
residents with a need for PEI services Best approaches for addressing PEI in OC
47
Preliminary Data Analysis Results
Community PEI SurveyOrange County
48
Race/Ethnicity of Community Respondents (n=426)
3.1% 2.1% 1.6% 0.9%
14.3% 9.6%
68.3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
White
/Cauc
asian
Hispan
ic/La
tino
Asian
Black/A
frica
n Am
erica
n
Amer
India
n/Nat
ive A
mer
Other
/Mult
iple
Pacific
Islan
der
49
Age & Gender of Community Respondents
Average Age (n=420)
45.2 years (15-89 yrs) Gender (n=432)
71.1% Female 28.9% Male
50
Average Annual Household Income
10.0%
32.9%
31.2%
25.9%
< $25,000 $25,000-$74,999 $75,000-$124,999 $125,000+
51
Community Opinions Regarding Priority Populations for PEI in OC
(Averages on a 5-point scale, where 1=Very Low Need, 5=Very High Need)
4.424.21 4.16 4.05 3.97 3.94
4.62 4.53
3.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
52
Community Opinions Regarding Priority Goals/Needs for PEI in OCReduction of:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Suicide
(41.
2%)
Traum
a & S
uffer
ing (3
3.5%
)
Violen
ce (3
3.5%
)
Homele
ssne
ss (3
1.0%
)
Undete
cted
MH Pro
bs (2
9.8%
)
Schoo
l Fail
ure/
Dropo
ut (2
9.4%
)
Remov
al of
Chil
dren
(20.7
%)
MH S
tigm
a (16
.4%)
Arrest
& Jail (
15.5%
)
Milit
ary V
et Pro
bs (1
4.1%
)
Unemplo
ymen
t (5.
9%)
Elderly
, AOD &
Oth
er (1
0.0%
)
53
Community Opinions Regarding Effective Settings for Identifying OC Residents Needing PEI Services
61.0%
29.6% 29.4% 28.0%
11.4% 9.3% 8.2%
44.4%
34.4%
13.4%
3.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Schoo
ls
Docto
r Offi
ces/C
linics
Social
Ser
vices
Comm
unity
Org
s
Hospit
als, S
NF, etc
Lega
l Set
tings
Faith-B
ased O
rgs
Work
plac
es
In-H
ome
(Fam
ily, S
vcs)
Emplo
yment
Cent
ers
Oth
er Set
tings
54
Community Opinions RegardingBest Approaches/Strategies for Addressing PEI in OC
64.6% 60.3%
16.9%
2.6%
73.1% 69.7%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Traini
ng fo
r Pro
fessio
nals
Early
Scree
ning
Commun
ity E
duca
tion
Info
& Refe
rral R
esou
rces
Wor
k-Bas
ed P
rogr
ams
Other
Stra
tegies
55
There are enough existing PEI resources and services in OC. (n=436 public responses, average=1.87 on a 5-point scale, where 1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree)
48.9%
2.1%
16.5%
6.7%
25.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
StronglyDisagree
SomewhatDisagree
Neither AgreeNor Disagree
SomewhatAgree
Strongly Agree
56
There is enough information available about how to find and access existing PEI resources and services in OC.
(n=432 public responses, average=1.97 on a 5-point scale, where 1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree)
42.8%
30.1%
9.3%
1.6%
16.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
StronglyDisagree
SomewhatDisagree
Neither AgreeNor Disagree
SomewhatAgree
Strongly Agree
57
Sample of Community Respondent Suggestions for OC PEI Services (Related to Provider Needs) Focus on a strength-based model instead of
pathology and symptoms More training opportunities for employees Funding should provide for safe placement of MI Needs to be a way to keep MI in Tx & on meds Support community infrastructure non-profits
which provide referrals and public education Increase number of small, short-term triage
centers where law enforcement can drop off pts Need to support existing programs while trying
to expand services to at risk populations
58
Sample of Community Respondent Suggestions for OC PEI Services (Related to Consumer Needs) Need for on-site technical assistance in schools,
especially in all preschools & child care centers More counselors & free counseling at school sites More accessible services for single parents/kids Advertise on TV, radio, local papers, etc. Training for family members of newly diagnosed Bilingual services in South OC are severely limited More housing options (with SUPPORT) for MI Ability to see a professional sooner once a referral is
made. We’ve been waiting over 6 months.
59
Information Gathered from Organizational Providers in OC
Types of organizations serving OC community Populations, ages & numbers served in OC Types of PEI services provided Annual budget and percent allocated to PEI Priority goals for PEI in OC Satisfaction with number of PEI resources &
amount of info to find/access PEI services in OC PEI resources needed by OC providers How OC can best deliver PEI svcs to
underserved
60
Preliminary Data Analysis Results
Organizational PEI SurveyOrange County
61
Types of Respondent Organizations (Potential PEI Partners)
27.6%29.5% 27.1%
7.4% 6.8% 6.3% 5.3%
3.2% 2.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
CBO (n=11
2)
MH S
vcs (
n=10
5)
Educ (
n=103
)
Healthca
re (n
=28)
Soc S
vcs (
n=26
)
Law (n
=24)
Other
(n=2
0)
Rep MI (
n=12
)
Empl
Svcs (
n=8)
62
Provider Opinions Regarding Priority Goals/Needs for PEI in OCReduction of:
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Undet
ected
MH P
robs
(43.
2%)
Schoo
l Failu
re/D
ropo
ut (38.
9%)
Violen
ce (3
6.3%
)
Homel
essn
ess (
36.3
%)
Traum
a & S
uffe
ring (3
4.7%
)
Suicid
e (2
7.6%
)
MH S
tigm
a (1
7.1%
)
Arrest
& Jail (
16.8
%)
Remov
al of
Chil
dren
(15.
3%)
Unem
ploym
ent (
14.7
%)
Milit
ary
Vet P
robs
(5.5
%)
AOD U
se/A
buse
(3.0
%)
63
There are enough existing PEI resources and services in OC. (n=372 provider responses, average=1.72 on a 5-point scale, where 1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree)
58.3%
21.8%
11.8%
1.9%
6.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
StronglyDisagree
SomewhatDisagree
Neither AgreeNor Disagree
SomewhatAgree
Strongly Agree
64
There is enough information available about how to find and access existing PEI resources and services in OC.
(n=377 provider responses, average=1.85 on a 5-point scale, where 1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree)
8.8%
1.3%
10.1%
32.4%
47.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
StronglyDisagree
SomewhatDisagree
Neither AgreeNor Disagree
SomewhatAgree
Strongly Agree
65
PEI Resources Needed by Respondent Organizations
42.1% 41.6% 40.5% 40.5% 39.7%
23.2%
12.9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
66
Strategies to Reach Underserved Groups with PEI Services
61.1%57.9%
41.8%
28.2%
12.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Services WhereGroups
Congregate
InvolveCommunity &
ReligiousLeaders
Info Provided inMultiple
Languages
Work-basedPrograms (e.g.,
EAP)
Other
67
Sample of Organizational Respondent Suggestions for OC PEI Services (Related to Provider Needs)
Full partnership between public/private providers Bring services to the people at school, work, home,
malls, EDs, government offices (e.g., DMV, HCA) Web-based “Efforts to Outcomes” tracking system Promote more screening at clinics & doctor offices Keep funding Family Resource Centers Administer assessment tool at school enrollment Attention to alcohol and drug abuse Tx community Ongoing education for educators, med providers, etc Involve leaders from faith-based communities
68
Sample of Organizational Respondent Suggestions for OC PEI Services (Related to Consumer Needs) Community education seminars by area professionals More groups for DV, anger mgmt, coping skills, etc More culturally/linguistically sensitive services & staff TV ads with information for parents & teens More “drop-in” centers available for homeless Services for underserved workforce in South OC, e.g.,
some areas with up to 90% Hispanic residents Increase awareness of early signs of MH problems Increase accessibility to low-cost counseling/referral Tx for the whole individual (physical & psychological)
69
Next Steps (July ’08)
Continue analyzing survey data (including surveys received by 6/30/08)
Report findings to BHS re: Public opinions re priority populations, settings,
issues & goals for PEI in OC Satisfaction ratings for amount and accessibility of
PEI resources/services in OC Suggested PEI goals, strategies, settings,
approaches, etc. for reaching those in need
70
For more information regarding methods used for data collection, preliminary
analyses, or this summary of results …
Contact:Kimari Phillips, MA, CHES
Research Analyst, OC Health Care AgencyOffice of Quality Management
Planning & Research(714) 834-7402
71
Sharon Browning
Review of Steering Committee Guidelines
72
Role of the Steering Committee 1. Be fully educated about the status of State
MHSA funding availability and requirements and the status of OC MHSA program implementation.
2. Support the County’s ability to meet both state funding requirements and Orange County funding needs.
3. Make timely, effective decisions that maximize the amount of funding secured by Orange County and preclude Orange County from losing funding for which it is potentially eligible.
73
Role of the Steering Committee4. Ensure that funding is allocated to services for
identified needs and priorities.
5. Support and ensure the proper implementation of Orange County’s MHSA approved plan for each MHSA component and the MHSA Integrated Plan, when it is developed.
6. Remain informed about Stakeholder Focus Group and Community Advisory meetings and the recommendations made by members of these groups.
74
Decision-Making Decisions will be made via consensus.
Consensus is defined as agreement of all committee members or the decision will not move forward.
A “yes” means that the decision will be actively supported or at a minimum nothing will be done to undermine the success of the decision.
A “no” means that the proposed decision cannot move forward.
The goal in effective consensus decision-making is to find ways to say “yes” wherever possible and to say “no” only when absolutely necessary and when prepared to stop the proposed decision [as stated] from moving forward.
75
Decision-Making Only those representatives officially designated
to participate in decision-making by their organization may participate in discussions/decisions and sit at the Committee tables.
There will be time for Public Comment at the end of each meeting. Each comment should be limited to three minutes.
76
Break
77
Sharon Browning
PEI Planning Guidelines
78
Planning Guidelines PEI Vision Statement
Purpose of the PEI Planning Process
Key PEI Community Mental Health Needs
PEI Priority Populations
Planning Structure
79
Guiding Principles Difference Between CSS and PEI
Age Distribution of Funding
PEI Transformational Concepts
Non-Supplantation Requirement
80
Planning Process Review Needs Assessment Data
Workgroup, PEI Sub Committee, and HCA Staff Draft Recommendations
HCA Staff Presents Recommendations to the Steering Committee Steering Committee discuss recommendations Make suggestions for changes, if needed Come to consensus on final recommendations
81
Next Steering Committee Meeting
Monday, August 4, 2008 1:00-4:00 PMat
Delhi Community Center 505 East Central, Santa Ana, CA 92707