mercury monitoring the fdep laboratory perspective timothy w. fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083...

25
Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fi[email protected].fl. us

Upload: cecil-nelson

Post on 16-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Mercury Monitoring

The FDEP Laboratory Perspective

Timothy W. Fitzpatrick

(850) [email protected]

Page 2: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Considerations:Considerations: Compliance versus Environmental Compliance versus Environmental

MonitoringMonitoring

Sample Kit PreparationSample Kit PreparationSampling ProtocolsSampling ProtocolsLaboratory DesignLaboratory DesignAnalytical RigorAnalytical RigorData InterpretationData Interpretation

Page 3: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

FDEP’s ExperienceFDEP’s Experience

Constructed Class 1000/100 in mid-Constructed Class 1000/100 in mid-1990s;1990s;

Adopted Method 1631 w/ some Adopted Method 1631 w/ some modifications from initial EPA version modifications from initial EPA version (semi-automated the method, (semi-automated the method, investigated aqua regia digestion);investigated aqua regia digestion);

Developed fully automated Developed fully automated methylmercury analysis in late 1990s methylmercury analysis in late 1990s using direct ethylation P&T GCAF;using direct ethylation P&T GCAF;

EPA incorporated semi-automated EPA incorporated semi-automated advances in Method 1631E; Automation advances in Method 1631E; Automation of Draft Method 1630 under evaluation by of Draft Method 1630 under evaluation by EPA Region IV;EPA Region IV;

Page 4: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

FDEP’s ExperienceFDEP’s Experience

Primary Client Focus: Environmental Primary Client Focus: Environmental Monitoring and ResearchMonitoring and Research

Detection Limits:Detection Limits:

THg ~ 100 pg/L (0.10 ng/L)THg ~ 100 pg/L (0.10 ng/L)

MeHg ~ 20 pg/L (0.02 ng/L)MeHg ~ 20 pg/L (0.02 ng/L)Initiated Everglades Mercury Round Initiated Everglades Mercury Round Robins ca. 2000Robins ca. 2000

Page 5: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Introduction to Method Introduction to Method 16691669

““Clean hands/dirty hands” samplingClean hands/dirty hands” sampling Ultra-trace detection levels and Ultra-trace detection levels and

methodsmethods Tables listing applicable levels in Tables listing applicable levels in

sampling methods sampling methods ““Mindset” and technique Mindset” and technique

Protection of sample against Protection of sample against contaminationcontamination

Page 6: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Sampling KitsSampling Kits

Double Bagged, Pre-Cleaned Vessels of Double Bagged, Pre-Cleaned Vessels of Glass, Teflon or Surface Fluorinated P-E Glass, Teflon or Surface Fluorinated P-E Prepared in LaboratoryPrepared in Laboratory

Prices: Glass < Fluor. PE <<< TeflonPrices: Glass < Fluor. PE <<< TeflonPre-Cleaned Sampling Equipment May Be Pre-Cleaned Sampling Equipment May Be

Needed (Needed (Teflon Tubing, Silicon Pump Tubing, Filtration Teflon Tubing, Silicon Pump Tubing, Filtration Devices, etc.)Devices, etc.)

Laboratories are Sources of Contamination! Laboratories are Sources of Contamination! (Air, DI Water, Reagents, etc.)(Air, DI Water, Reagents, etc.)

Clean Benches or Clean Room Strongly Clean Benches or Clean Room Strongly Recommended for Equip. Preparation Recommended for Equip. Preparation (Absolute Necessity for Environ. Monitoring)(Absolute Necessity for Environ. Monitoring)

Page 7: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Sampling by Method 1669Sampling by Method 1669

Performance Based MethodPerformance Based MethodCompliance vs. Environmental Compliance vs. Environmental Monitoring: When is the Full-Blown Monitoring: When is the Full-Blown Method Necessary (or Practical)?Method Necessary (or Practical)?Our Experience w/ Hg – Most Our Experience w/ Hg – Most Contamination Occurs in the Contamination Occurs in the LaboratoryLaboratoryVessels Need to be Prepared in a Vessels Need to be Prepared in a ‘Clean’ Laboratory Environment‘Clean’ Laboratory Environment

Page 8: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Sample Collection SOPSample Collection SOP

DEP SOP FS 8200DEP SOP FS 8200 http://www.dep.state.fl.us/labs/qa/sops.htmhttp://www.dep.state.fl.us/labs/qa/sops.htm

Adapted from EPA 1669Adapted from EPA 1669 ““Performance-based” conceptPerformance-based” concept Verify performance with blanks & other Verify performance with blanks & other

QCQC Sampling team practice recommendedSampling team practice recommended

Page 9: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Field Contamination IssuesField Contamination Issues

Source of analyte-free water for Source of analyte-free water for field blanks and equipment blanksfield blanks and equipment blanks

Sampling equipment and sample Sampling equipment and sample containerscontainers

Sampling personnel and clothingSampling personnel and clothing Ambient sampling environmentAmbient sampling environment Sampling techniquesSampling techniques

Page 10: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Sampling Equipment Sampling Equipment DecontaminationDecontamination Minimum amount of pre-cleaned Minimum amount of pre-cleaned

equipment (only) recommended ;equipment (only) recommended ; Controlled environment for cleaning;Controlled environment for cleaning; See FS 8200 cleaning procedures;See FS 8200 cleaning procedures;

Specific cleaning procedure for mercury;Specific cleaning procedure for mercury; All pre-cleaned items wrapped for field use;All pre-cleaned items wrapped for field use; Field-based cleaning not recommended;Field-based cleaning not recommended; Dippers not recommended; Collect directly Dippers not recommended; Collect directly

into sample bottles where possible;into sample bottles where possible;

Page 11: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

On-site PrecautionsOn-site Precautions All equipment and supplies in covered All equipment and supplies in covered

storage until usestorage until use Keep hands and equipment away from Keep hands and equipment away from

contamination sourcescontamination sources Adhere to “clean hands/dirty hands” Adhere to “clean hands/dirty hands”

protocolsprotocols Change gloves when neededChange gloves when needed Collect least contaminated source firstCollect least contaminated source first

Develop a ‘contamination sensitive’ mindsetDevelop a ‘contamination sensitive’ mindset

Page 12: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Precautions for Sampling Precautions for Sampling Equipment & Protective Equipment & Protective ClothingClothing

Caution advised with pigmented Caution advised with pigmented materials, bottle labels, inkmaterials, bottle labels, ink

See FS 8200 for recommended See FS 8200 for recommended sampling equipment and materials to sampling equipment and materials to avoidavoid

Wrap cleaned pump tubing endsWrap cleaned pump tubing ends Don’t contaminate tubing with pump Don’t contaminate tubing with pump

or extension deviceor extension device

Page 13: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Sample Preservation & Sample Preservation & TransportTransport Add HCl preservative upon return to Add HCl preservative upon return to

lablab Max of 48 hours on ice prior to Max of 48 hours on ice prior to

preservativepreservative Protect bagged samples from Protect bagged samples from

contamination during transport and contamination during transport and storage storage

Isolate or segregate samples as Isolate or segregate samples as neededneeded

Page 14: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

0

50

100

150

200

250

Equip.Bland

G253E G254C 012 G252G G252C G255 002 002FieldDup.

004 FieldBlank

Comparison of Collection and Analytical Techniques for Everglades Sites Mercury in ng/L

Method 1669/1631

Conventional Collection/1631

1669/245.1*

1669/245.1 - Conventional Preparation @ SFWMD; Analysis using pre-concentration

CVAAS; MDL = 50 ng/L

Page 15: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Laboratory Design Laboratory Design Considerations: Clean Bench vs. Considerations: Clean Bench vs.

Clean LabClean LabCost vs. Type of Work EnvisionedCost vs. Type of Work EnvisionedWorkload IssuesWorkload Issues

Sampling Bottle and Equipment Sampling Bottle and Equipment PreparationPreparation

Sample Preparation and Determinative Sample Preparation and Determinative StepsStepsFugitive Vapor ControlFugitive Vapor ControlParticulate ControlParticulate ControlInstrument LocationInstrument Location

Without proper controls, spurious laboratory Without proper controls, spurious laboratory contamination can exceed water quality standards!contamination can exceed water quality standards!

Page 16: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us
Page 17: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Instrument SchematicInstrument Schematic

Page 18: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Analytical Rigor245.1 versus 1631

Blank subtraction allowedNo blank subtraction

CVAF detectionCVAA detection

PQL ~ 0.2 – 0.5 ppt (ng/L)PQL ~ 20 - 500 ppt (ng/L)

Pre-concentration by Au trapTypically no pre-concentration

Bromine monochloride digestionPermanganate/persulfatedigestion

Class 1000 lab environmentClean room not required

Clean sample collection – EPA method 1669

No clean sample collection required

Method 1631Method 245.1

Page 19: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Blanks in 1631Blanks in 1631

Blanks play a critical role in monitoring Blanks play a critical role in monitoring contamination, and quantifying the mercury contamination, and quantifying the mercury content of samplescontent of samples

Mercury levels in (digested) method blanks Mercury levels in (digested) method blanks may be higher than those present in ambient may be higher than those present in ambient samplessamples

Even the best de-ionized water has Even the best de-ionized water has measurable concentrations of mercurymeasurable concentrations of mercury

Digested blanks have Hg concentrations Digested blanks have Hg concentrations between 0.2 and 0.6 ng/Lbetween 0.2 and 0.6 ng/L

Page 20: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Blanks in 1631EBlanks in 1631E

Confounding of mercury levels in the Confounding of mercury levels in the reagent and the de-ionized water – reagent and the de-ionized water – cannot easily separate mercury content cannot easily separate mercury content of reagents from mercury in de-ionized of reagents from mercury in de-ionized water water

Assumption: Most of the “background Assumption: Most of the “background contamination” in method blanks is from contamination” in method blanks is from the reagents and not from the DI waterthe reagents and not from the DI water

No “bubbler blanks” used in the No “bubbler blanks” used in the automated methodautomated method

Page 21: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Quantification in 1631EQuantification in 1631E

Analyze 5 method blanks and calculate the Analyze 5 method blanks and calculate the blank correctionblank correction

Subtract this “blank correction term” from Subtract this “blank correction term” from all samplesall samples

Page 22: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Sensitivity RequirementsSensitivity Requirements

Natural WatersNatural Waters

Typical Levels:Typical Levels:0.5 – 2 ng/L THg0.5 – 2 ng/L THg< 0.02 – 0.2 ng/L MeHg< 0.02 – 0.2 ng/L MeHg

Recommended Recommended Quantitation Limits:Quantitation Limits:~ 0.5 ng/L THg~ 0.5 ng/L THg~0.05 ng/L MeHg~0.05 ng/L MeHg

Discharge MonitoringDischarge Monitoring

Water Quality Standards:Water Quality Standards:12 ng/L THg Fresh12 ng/L THg Fresh25 ng/L THg Marine25 ng/L THg Marine

Recommended Recommended Quantitation Limits:Quantitation Limits:< 10 ng/L THg Fresh< 10 ng/L THg Fresh< 25 ng/L THg Marine< 25 ng/L THg Marine

Page 23: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Data InterpretationDetection and QuantitationDetection and Quantitation

Detection Limit and Quantitation Detection Limit and Quantitation Limits are Influenced by:Limits are Influenced by:

Sampling vessels, collection and handling Sampling vessels, collection and handling techniquestechniques

Quality of the laboratory environment – Quality of the laboratory environment – particulate content of laboratory airparticulate content of laboratory air

Cleanliness of digestion reagents and Cleanliness of digestion reagents and procedureprocedure

Instrumental techniqueInstrumental technique

Page 24: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us

Data InterpretationRecommendationsRecommendations

Conduct on-going, long-term detection limit Conduct on-going, long-term detection limit studies rather than one-time studies; studies rather than one-time studies;

Confirm all water quality exceedances with Confirm all water quality exceedances with a separate analysis;a separate analysis;

Use multiple method blanks with each Use multiple method blanks with each analytical preparation batch;analytical preparation batch;

Use rigorous quality control measures to Use rigorous quality control measures to ensure data integrity;ensure data integrity;

Page 25: Mercury Monitoring The FDEP Laboratory Perspective Timothy W. Fitzpatrick (850) 245-8083 timothy.fitzpatrick@dep.state.fl.us