metabolic and hepatotoxic multiplex assay in 3d heparg model - … · 2020. 8. 10. · 3d liver...

1
RESULTS Welcome to www.dasterminal.com This poster template is sized at 1536 by 1080 pixels and is landscape oriented. (21,3’’ x 15’’) It looks small, but fits perfectly and will be shown on Das Terminals for digital poster presentation. There will be no printed posters. Modifying the Template The template contains a typical layout of text and headings common in conference posters. However, you can edit the template to make it your own by copying and pasting content. You’ll notice the templates' text is in red (to highlight the template area), but we suggest changing your text color to black and use a light background to increase readability. You can also change the background color. For perfect readability, We Recommend using Fonts 14 Points or Larger. Purpose, Method, Results, and Conclusion Sections must be included on your poster and must include the abstract as submitted and accepted for presentation. Image Resolution Acceptable image file formats are JPEG and PNG Make sure of having a high resolution picture with at least 1024 pixels (width) How to Bring in Text or Images from Excel and Word Excel Select the chart, select Edit>Copy, and then Edit>Paste into PowerPoint. The chart can then be stretched to fit as required. If you need to edit parts of the chart, it can be ungrouped. PLEASE BE AWARE: Scientific symbols used in imported charts, PowerPoint may not recognize as a font used in the poster and may print incorrectly if we don’t have the font installed on our system. Word Select the text to be brought into PowerPoint, select Edit>Copy, then Edit>Paste the text into a new or existing text block. This text is editable. You can change the size, color, etc. in format-text. We recommend that you do not use shadows on smaller text. Poster Number The upper left corner is the location of your assigned poster number. Replace all current Red text with your assigned poster number. Preview you work To confirm your poster images and text are high resolution, go to View>Zoom>100%. This is a good way to be sure your pictures and text look ok. Support If you have any comments regarding the template or need assistance, please contact our support team and reference the 2016 AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition Poster Presentations in the Subject Line. Email: 36W0300 Metabolic and Hepatotoxic Multiplex Assay in 3D HepaRG Model Lindsey Ott 1 , Karthik Ramachandran 1 , Lisa Stehno-Bittel 1,2 1 Likarda LLC, Kansas City, KS; 2 School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS PURPOSE METHODS 3D cell culture models have gained attention as a drug discovery platform to predictively evaluate therapeutic compound efficacy and toxicity. Current multicellular spheroid generation methods are limited by labor intensive and low throughput processes or reliance on biomaterial matrices that have lot-to-lot variation. We have developed a custom-designed micromold plate that creates uniform cellular spheroids in a high-throughput process with an ideal diameter for oxygen diffusion. 1,2 Our plate can be utilized with many cell types or screening methods (e.g., biochemical assays to phenotypic or high content screening). 3,4 CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES We have established that our custom spheroid- generating plates can produce 3D HepaRG spheroids that possess liver characteristics and can be utilized in toxicity and metabolism assays. Four assays were combined into a novel high throughput multiplex that provided predictive data on DILI and CYP inducing compounds. Our results demonstrate that our 3D liver spheroid system is a promising cell-based method to evaluate liver metabolism and toxicity for early stage drug discovery. 1. Williams SJ, Schwasinger-Schmidt T, Zamierowski D, Stehno-Bittel L. (2012) Diffusion into human islets is limited to molecules below 10 kDa. Tissue and Cell. 44(5):332-341. 2. MacGregor RR, Williams SJ, Tong PY, Kover K, Moore WV, Stehno-Bittel, L. (2006) Small rat islets are superior to large islets in vitro function and in transplantation outcomes. Am J. Physiol Endocrinol. Metabl. 295(5):E771-9. 3. Ramachandran K, Williams SJ, Huang HH, Novikova L, Stehno-Bittel L. (2013) Engineering islets for improved performance by optimized reaggregation in a micromold. Tiss Eng. 19(5):604-612. 4. Ramachandran K, Peng X, Bokvist K, Stehno-Bittel L. (2014) Assessment of reaggregated human pancreatic islets for secondary drug screening. Br. J. Pharm. 171(12):3010-3022. 5. Gustafsson F, Foster A, Sarda S, Bridgland-Taylor M, Kenna JG. (2014) A Correlation Between the In Vitro Drug Toxicity of Drugs to Cell Lines That Express Human P450s and Their Propensity to Cause Liver Injury in Humans. Toxicol. Sci. 137(1):189-211. Figure 1: Microplate design. A) The version 1 plate design allows easy cluster retrieval for assays completed in standard microwell plates. 3 B) Version 2 plate design for complete in-well assays. A B Figure 3: Cell Morphology and Functional Markers. HepaRG cells (Biopredic International) were cultured in the micromold plates (Fig. 1) and produced uniform spheroids. Photomicrographs (on the left) illustrate cell morphology and immunostaining of liver-specific markers (albumin = Alb, CYP3A4, MRP2). Graphs (on the right) illustrate liver-specific functions. A) Albumin secretion detected by ELISA. 3D cultures secreted more albumin over time, while albumin decreased in 2D cultures over time. B-C) Basal CYP3A4 and CYP1A activity detected by P450-Glo kit and EROD assay. 3D cultures possessed more active CYP enzymes than 2D cultures. Figure 2: Multiplex protocol. The multiplex assays were performed with an automated liquid handling system and were executed at 24 hour, 3 day, and 7 day time points (n=4). Viability (ATP-content; Promega CellTiter-Glo), cytotoxicity (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) production; Promega Cytotox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity), and liver enzyme assays (CYP3A4; Promega P450-Glo Luc-IPA; and CYP1A; ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) assay) were included in the multiplex. ü Proprietary plate generates 150 clusters per well in a 384–well format A B C 2D 24 hr 2D 7 day 3D 24 hr 3D 7 day Alb (g) CYP3a4 (r) MRP2 (g) ü Comparison of 2D and 3D HepaRG cells tested with known liver toxins—3D more sensitive to toxins than 2D ü HTS multiplex assay evaluates toxicity and metabolism from a single well ü HepaRG spheroids maintain 3D shape and express liver-specific markers B C ü Cells tested with known CYP inducers—3D spheroids are metabolically competent Figure 5: Liver Enzyme Activity Induction. A) Known CYP enzyme inducers were tested on 2D and 3D HepaRG cells for 24 hours and 7 days. Enzyme activity was determined using P450-Glo and the EROD assay. The EC50 and Emax values were obtained from dose-response curves fit with a one-site hyperbola function. To be classified as an inducer, the Emax values had to be greater than 1.5-fold induction (Red). B-C) Representative graphs of dose-response curves for a CYP1A inducer (Omeprazole) in 2D (B) and 3D (C) at 7 days. D) Rank order of inducer compound potency. D A Figure 4: Liver Toxicity. A) Known liver toxins were tested on 2D and 3D HepaRG cells for 24 hours and 7 days. Viability was determined using a CellTiter-Glo kit. The IC50 values were obtained from the dose- response curve fit with a 4PL curve and the Margin of Safety was calculated. B-C) DILI Severity Category 5 and a 30XMOS threshold were used to determine True Positive (toxic; Red) and True Negative (nontoxic; Green) compounds. D) Representative graph of dose- response curves for compounds in 3D at 7 days. A D B C

Upload: others

Post on 28-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Metabolic and Hepatotoxic Multiplex Assay in 3D HepaRG Model - … · 2020. 8. 10. · 3D liver spheroid system is a promising cell-based method to evaluate liver metabolism and toxicity

RESULTS

Welcome to www.dasterminal.com

This poster template is sized at 1536 by 1080 pixels and is landscape oriented.(21,3’’ x 15’’) It looks small, but fits perfectly and will be shown on Das Terminals for digital

poster presentation. There will be no printed posters.

Modifying the TemplateThe template contains a typical layout of text and headings common in conference posters.

However, you can edit the template to make it your own by copying and pasting content. You’ll notice the templates' text is in red (to highlight the template area), but we suggest changing your text color to black and use a light background to increase readability. You can also change the background color.

For perfect readability, We Recommend using Fonts 14 Points or Larger.

Purpose, Method, Results, and Conclusion Sections must be included on your poster and must include the abstract as submitted and accepted for presentation.

Image ResolutionAcceptable image file formats are JPEG and PNGMake sure of having a high resolution picture with at least 1024 pixels (width)

How to Bring in Text or Images from Excel and WordExcelSelect the chart, select Edit>Copy, and then Edit>Paste into PowerPoint. The chart can then be

stretched to fit as required. If you need to edit parts of the chart, it can be ungrouped.

PLEASE BE AWARE: Scientific symbols used in imported charts, PowerPoint may not recognize as a font used in the poster and may print incorrectly if we don’t have the font installed on our system.

WordSelect the text to be brought into PowerPoint, select Edit>Copy, then Edit>Paste the text into a new

or existing text block. This text is editable. You can change the size, color, etc. in format-text. We recommend that you do not use shadows on smaller text.

Poster NumberThe upper left corner is the location of your assigned poster number. Replace all current Red text with your assigned poster number.

Preview you workTo confirm your poster images and text are high resolution, go to View>Zoom>100%. This is a good

way to be sure your pictures and text look ok.

Support If you have any comments regarding the template or need assistance, please contact our support team and reference the 2016 AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition Poster Presentations in the Subject Line.

Email:

36W0300Metabolic and Hepatotoxic Multiplex Assay in 3D HepaRG Model

Lindsey Ott1, Karthik Ramachandran1, Lisa Stehno-Bittel1,21Likarda LLC, Kansas City, KS; 2School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

PURPOSE

METHODS

3D cell culture models have gained attention as a drugdiscovery platform to predictively evaluate therapeuticcompound efficacy and toxicity. Current multicellular spheroidgeneration methods are limited by labor intensive and lowthroughput processes or reliance on biomaterial matrices thathave lot-to-lot variation. We have developed a custom-designedmicromold plate that creates uniform cellular spheroids in ahigh-throughput process with an ideal diameter for oxygendiffusion.1,2 Our plate can be utilized with many cell types orscreening methods (e.g., biochemical assays to phenotypic orhigh content screening).3,4

CONCLUSIONS

REFERENCES

We have established that our custom spheroid-generating plates can produce 3D HepaRG spheroids thatpossess liver characteristics and can be utilized in toxicity andmetabolism assays. Four assays were combined into a novelhigh throughput multiplex that provided predictive data on DILIand CYP inducing compounds. Our results demonstrate that our3D liver spheroid system is a promising cell-based method toevaluate liver metabolism and toxicity for early stage drugdiscovery.

1. Williams SJ, Schwasinger-Schmidt T, Zamierowski D, Stehno-Bittel L. (2012) Diffusioninto human islets is limited to molecules below 10 kDa. Tissue and Cell. 44(5):332-341.2. MacGregor RR, Williams SJ, Tong PY, Kover K, Moore WV, Stehno-Bittel, L. (2006)Small rat islets are superior to large islets in vitro function and in transplantation outcomes.Am J. Physiol Endocrinol. Metabl. 295(5):E771-9.3. Ramachandran K, Williams SJ, Huang HH, Novikova L, Stehno-Bittel L. (2013)Engineering islets for improved performance by optimized reaggregation in a micromold.Tiss Eng. 19(5):604-612.4. Ramachandran K, Peng X, Bokvist K, Stehno-Bittel L. (2014) Assessment ofreaggregated human pancreatic islets for secondary drug screening. Br. J. Pharm.171(12):3010-3022.5. Gustafsson F, Foster A, Sarda S, Bridgland-Taylor M, Kenna JG. (2014) A CorrelationBetween the In Vitro Drug Toxicity of Drugs to Cell Lines That Express Human P450s andTheir Propensity to Cause Liver Injury in Humans. Toxicol. Sci. 137(1):189-211.

Figure 1: Microplate design.A) The version 1 plate design allows easy cluster retrieval forassays completed in standard microwell plates.3 B) Version 2 platedesign for complete in-well assays.

A BFigure 3: Cell Morphology and Functional Markers.HepaRG cells (Biopredic International) were cultured in the micromold plates (Fig. 1) and produced uniformspheroids. Photomicrographs (on the left) illustrate cell morphology and immunostaining of liver-specificmarkers (albumin = Alb, CYP3A4, MRP2). Graphs (on the right) illustrate liver-specific functions. A) Albuminsecretion detected by ELISA. 3D cultures secreted more albumin over time, while albumin decreased in 2Dcultures over time. B-C) Basal CYP3A4 and CYP1A activity detected by P450-Glo kit and EROD assay. 3Dcultures possessed more active CYP enzymes than 2D cultures.

Figure 2: Multiplex protocol.The multiplex assays were performed with an automated liquidhandling system and were executed at 24 hour, 3 day, and 7 daytime points (n=4). Viability (ATP-content; Promega CellTiter-Glo),cytotoxicity (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) production; PromegaCytotox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity), and liverenzyme assays (CYP3A4; Promega P450-Glo Luc-IPA; andCYP1A; ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) assay) wereincluded in the multiplex.

ü Proprietary plate generates 150 clusters perwell in a 384–well format

A

B

C

2D 24 hr

2D7 day

3D24 hr

3D7 day

Alb (g) CYP3a4 (r) MRP2 (g)

ü Comparison of 2D and 3D HepaRG cells tested with known liver toxins—3Dmore sensitive to toxins than 2D

ü HTS multiplex assay evaluates toxicity andmetabolism from a single well

ü HepaRG spheroids maintain 3D shape and express liver-specific markers

B

C

ü Cells tested with known CYP inducers—3Dspheroids are metabolically competent

Figure 5: Liver Enzyme Activity Induction.A) Known CYP enzyme inducers were tested on 2D and 3D HepaRGcells for 24 hours and 7 days. Enzyme activity was determined usingP450-Glo and the EROD assay. The EC50 and Emax values wereobtained from dose-response curves fit with a one-site hyperbolafunction. To be classified as an inducer, the Emax values had to begreater than 1.5-fold induction (Red). B-C) Representative graphs ofdose-response curves for a CYP1A inducer (Omeprazole) in 2D (B)and 3D (C) at 7 days. D) Rank order of inducer compound potency.

DA

Figure 4: Liver Toxicity.A) Known liver toxins were tested on 2D and 3DHepaRG cells for 24 hours and 7 days. Viabilitywas determined using a CellTiter-Glo kit. TheIC50 values were obtained from the dose-response curve fit with a 4PL curve and theMargin of Safety was calculated. B-C) DILISeverity Category5 and a 30XMOS thresholdwere used to determine True Positive (toxic;Red) and True Negative (nontoxic; Green)compounds. D) Representative graph of dose-response curves for compounds in 3D at 7 days.

A

D

B

C