methodology used by swiftly green 26th november 2015 gernoth götz, prof. markus hecht berlin...
TRANSCRIPT
Methodology used by SWIFTLY Green
26th November 2015
Gernoth Götz, Prof. Markus HechtBerlin Institute of Technology (Technische Universität Berlin)
Contact:
[email protected]@TU-Berlin.de
Basis of SWIFTLY Green
• Recommendations from SWIFTLY Green will build upon results and good practice from conducted EU projects as well as commercial, national and regional initiatives
• One task: Going through programs and projects (completed, on-going and planned projects and actions) related to transport and logistics that can be relevant for SWIFTLY Green
Data sources
SWIFTLY Green database
Nationally fundedprojects
Privately fundedprojects
Projects with a focus on transport serve as the major source:
Several projects funded by EU
• Vehicle development
• Transshipment technologies
• …
Various project results/measures • Which measure has a
greening potential?• Which of them are effective?• How to compare them?• Applicability of measures on corridor level?•…
Lots of uncertainties…
Aim: Greening of transport
From Projects to Measures
The 4 themes of SWIFTLY Green
Thematic group 1 Thematic group 2 Thematic group 3 Thematic group 4
Infrastructure - Links and Nodes
Logistics Solutions
Transport Techniques
Policies and Regulations
Theme leader: Trafikverket
Theme leader: Interporto Bologna
Theme leader:Berlin Institute of
Technology
Theme leader: Tiroler
Landesregierung
Objective: Identification of innovative Services and Transport Techniques
Evaluation Methodology1. Sorting and Clustering
Clusters (Core fields)
Last Mile Access
Alternative Fuels
Vehicle Improvement
Alternative Transport Systems
Specialised containers
Port Innovation
Improved utilisation rate
…
Cluster Group A
Cluster Group B
Measure 1Measure 2Measure 3
Measure 4Measure 5...
... ...
Transport Flow Improvement
Cluster Group A
Cluster Group B
Measure 1Measure 2Measure 3
Measure 4Measure 5...
... ...
Modal Shift
Cluster Group A
Cluster Group B
Measure 1Measure 2Measure 3
Measure 4Measure 5...
... ...
Energy and GHG Reduction
Cluster Group A
Cluster Group B
Measure 1Measure 2Measure 3
Measure 4Measure 5...
... ...
Measures for Noise Reduction
Evaluation Methodology2. Development of an Analysis Method
Two-phase approach:
Utility analysis
supported by a
STEEP analysis
Evaluation Workflow:
Setting up the assessment criteria
Weighting of the objective criteria
Evaluation of alternatives
Determination of total utility by aggregating the part-values
Selection of the best alternatives
Assessment Criteria
Greening Effect: Potential to promote green and sustainable freight transport in Europe.
Marketability: To estimate whether a measure can be implemented and ever come in question for further considerations.
Corridor Scope: Assess whether a measure is bound to a certain corridor or can be readily transferred to TEN-T corridors.
Util
ity w
eigh
ting
Greening Effect: 0.5
Marketability: 0.35
Corridor Scope: 0.15
Weighting of criteria of the utility analysis:(1st level)
Assessment Criteria
Successive consideration of all five areas
Avoids to overlook important factors or even whole topics during the evaluation
General method was transferred to asses Swiftly Green transport measures
S • Social
T • Technical
E • Economic
E • Ecological
P • Political
Assessment Criteria of a STEEP analysis:
STEEP applied to Swiftly Green
Inclusion of the STEEP analysis in the utility analysis allows considering a wide range of important criteria
It outlines the factors to be considered in the analysis
· Acceptance of measures by· corridor users· people
affected by corridor
· Stage of development
· Interoperability· Infrastructure
· Investement costs· Lifecycle costs
· Noise load· Energy
consumption· GHG emissions· geographic
circumstances
· legal restrictions on· EU level· National level· regional level
S T E E P
Evaluation Results(Utility analysis)
Expected results:
Deeper knowledge on what is needed, what is useful and
what is not useful, for greening of transport
Point out measures that are not successful
Useful measures: preparation as recommendation and for
further tests & validation
Further evaluation - Estimate effectiveness of measures in terms of greening transport:
On a general level
The application in the corridor
Possibility for adaption to other TEN-T corridors
Visualisation of results for quick evaluation
Further analysis and comparison of measures is necessary for final evaluation
Evaluation Results(Comprehensive fact sheets)
• Summary of all evaluated measures as fact sheets
• Utility analysis and further evaluation criteria of the STEEP analysis
Additionally:
• Transferability: Recommendations according to the applicability of the measure along the corridor and other corridors
Evaluation Results(Fact sheet example)
Summary
Identification of measures for the greening objectives: Noise reduction Energy consumption and GHG Emissions Modal shift Increased transport flow efficiency
Analyzation of measures in four thematic groups: Infrastructure, Logistics Solutions, Transport Technique, Politics and Regulations
More than 100 measures (the most relevant) have been chosen (or an example of those) and evaluated
Clear presentation in fact sheets, tables and graphics
Results passed to the Toolbox
www.swiftlygreen.eu
Thank you for your attention.
Contact:
Gernoth Götz ([email protected])Markus Hecht ([email protected])