michael roche, queensland resource council - mining industry working with communities to mitigate...
Post on 14-Sep-2014
555 views
DESCRIPTION
Michael Roche, Chief Executive Officer, Queensland Resource Council delivered this presentation at the 10th Annual Bulk Materials Handling conference 2013. This conference is an expert led forum on the engineering behind the latest expansions and upgrades of bulk materials facilities. It also evaluates the latest engineering feats that are creating record levels of throughput whilst minimising downtime. For more information on this conference, please vist http://www.informa.com.au/bmh2014TRANSCRIPT
Michael Roche
Chief Executive
Environmental Management in Materials Handling 5 June 2013
Working with communities to mitigate environmental issues
> The Queensland Resources Council (QRC) is a not-for-profit peak industry
association representing the commercial developers of Queensland’s
minerals and energy resources
> 86 full members – explorers, miners, mineral processors, site contractors,
oil and gas producers, electricity generators
> 193 service members - providers of goods or services to the sector
> Multi-commodity peak body specialising in Queensland-based advocacy
Who is the Queensland Resources Council?
86
full
members
193
service
members
40
associate
members
Aberdare Collieries
Adani Mining
A.J. Lucas Coal Technologies
Alcyone Resources
Allegiance Coal
Altona Mining
Ambre Energy
Anglo American Exploration
Anglo American
Aquila Resources
Areva Resources Australia
Arrow Energy
Bandanna Energy
BHP Billiton Cannington
BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance
Birla Mt. Gordon
Blackwood Corporation
Caledon Coal
Cape Alumina
Cape Flattery Silica Mines
Carabella Resources
Carbon Energy
Carpentaria Gold
Cement Australia
Civil Mining and Construction
Clean Energy Australasia
Coalbank
Cockatoo Coal
CuDeco
Downer EDI Mining
Eagle Downs Coal Management
Ensham Resources
ERM Power
Evolution Mining
Exco Resources
Golding Contractors
Guildford Coal
Hancock Coal
Investigator Resources
Ivanhoe Australia
Jellinbah Resources
Jindal Steel & Power
John Holland
Lagoon Creek Resources
Leighton Contractors
Liberty Resources
Linc Energy
Macmahon Holdings
MacMines Austasia
Mastermyne
Mega Uranium
Metallica Minerals
MetroCoal
Millmerran Power Management
Minerals and Metals Group
Mitsubishi Development
New Hope Group
Norton Gold Fields
Origin Energy
OZ Uranium
Paladin Resources
Peabody Energy
QCoal
QER
QGC
Rio Tinto Alcan
Rio Tinto Coal Australia
Santos/TOGA
Sibelco Australia
Sojitz Coal Mining
Sonoma Mine Management
Stanmore Coal
Summit Resources
Superior Coal
Tata Steel Resources Australia
Thiess
Vale
Vital Metals
Watpac Civil & Mining
Wesfarmers Resources
Westside Corporation
Whitehaven Coal
Xstrata Coal Australia
Xstrata Copper
Xstrata Zinc Australia
Yancoal Australia
4
Health, education, immigration and roads top-of-mind issues
20%
12%
2%
8%
17%
16%
4%
3%
9%
4%
3%
18%
5%
2%
4%
4%
35%
29%
19%
18%
18%
10%
9%
8%
7%
7%
6%
6%
6%
5%
4%
4%
Health
Education
Illegal immigration / boat people
Roads
Economy & Finances
Employment
Budget
Social & welfare
Mining & resources
Environment
Taxes
Cost of living
Rural & regional
Other public infrastructure
Crime
Government & politicians
Total 2012
Total 2013
5
Support for the mining & resources industry remains high
79%
33%
16%
5%
5%
82%
35%
14%
5%
4%
TOTAL SUPPORT
Strongly support
TOTAL OPPOSE
Strongly oppose
Don’t know / No
opinion
Total 2012
Total 2013
6
Top spontaneous reasons to support the resources sector
42%
39%
12%
10%
9%
8%
7%
7%
5%
4%
4%
4%
50%
43%
11%
7%
7%
6%
4%
4%
5%
4%
3%
0%
Employment
Economy / exports
Personal interest/involvement
Economy needs mining & resources / Other industries cannot
support
Benefits for region / Good for local economy
Conditional Support - depending on other factors
Meet energy/mineral demands/be self-sufficient/maintain lifestyle
Concerns about environmental damage
Make use of the resources we have
For progress/growth
General benefits to the state/nation
They know what they are doing
Total 2012
Total 2013
7
General environmental concerns dominate
29%
24%
11%
10%
10%
9%
9%
8%
6%
4%
4%
4%
2%
32%
25%
8%
9%
12%
3%
13%
12%
9%
6%
2%
8%
3%
19%
38%
14%
19%
8%
10%
6%
6%
5%
4%
0%
0%
4%
32%
18%
10%
5%
10%
15%
13%
9%
3%
3%
10%
4%
3%
40%
9%
8%
2%
15%
2%
7%
11%
9%
5%
3%
9%
0%
Environmental
Taking over agricultural land/Destroying farmers’ livelihoods
Anti CSG
Impact on landholders' / farmers' rights
Short term gain/Too much too quickly
Water contamination, usage concerns
There has not been enough research
Profits go overseas
Ethical concerns/Greed
Impcat on community / locals have no say
Environment - Flora/Fauna/Habitats
Land rehabilitation/Conservation process is insufficient
Increases the cost of housing/living
Total 2013
Soft voters
DD Regional
CQ Regional
Marginal Electorates
QRC environment policy
Promote sustainable environmental management outcomes throughout the resources sector
Secure leading systems of environmental administration and regulation
QRC provides strategic leadership by:
• promoting leading environmental management
• promoting continual improvements in environmental performance
• promoting the conservation of biodiversity
• facilitating stakeholder communication
• establishing an industry position on environmental issues
• working with key stakeholders to achieve an equitable legislative framework
1. Disrupt and delay key infrastructure
2. Constrain the space for mining 3. Increase investor risk 4. Increase costs 5. Withdraw social licence of coal industry 6. Build a powerful movement
1. Disrupt and delay key infrastructure
Challenge and delay key infrastructure developments (ports and rail) and ‘mega mines’. • Wandoan Supreme Court challenge (taxpayer-funded through EDO) • Multiple Land Court challenges to issuing of mining leases, often by persons with no connection to projects under challenge • EPBC amendments – ‘water trigger’ and ‘Great Barrier Reef’ • World Heritage-in danger listing threat for GBR because of port development, and ignoring the real threats
2. Constrain the space for mining
Build on the outrage created by coal seam gas to win federal and state based reforms to exclude mining from key areas, such as farmland, nature refuges, aquifers, and near homes. Landowners locking the gate. • NSW/Qld exclusion zones for exploration • Lock The Gate – from Tara to NSW overstating angst; celebrity scaremongering • ‘Battle’ for Bimblebox Nature Reserve (Waratah Coal) • Gasland 1 & 2; Call to Country TV campaign • Dredging in GBR Marine Park/World Heritage Area
3. Increase investor risk Create uncertainty and a heightened perception of risk over coal investments
4. Increase costs Increasing the cost of coal is fundamental to the long-term global strategy to phase out the industry. We can start to remove the massive subsidies to the coal industry, and to internalize the ‘externalized’ costs of coal • Ongoing campaign to withdraw federal fuel tax credits • Court challenges, previously taxpayer-funded through EDOs • Expensive, unnecessary EPBC amendments • Federal approvals delaying tactics (TWS ships claim – South of Embley Project) • Greens’ pressure on MRRT amendments with ‘class warfare’ undertones
5. Withdraw social licence of the coal industry
Change the story of coal from being the backbone of our economy, to being a destructive industry that destroys the landscape and communities, corrupts our democracy, and threatens the global climate • Month-long Rainbow Warrior tour of coastal Queensland • Great Barrier Reef ‘coal superhighway’ campaign • Port expansions ‘dredging the reef’ • Demonisation of non-resident workers (FIFO/DIDO); 457 visa holders • ‘Greens health spokesperson, Dr Richard Di Natale, said today that the Greens- initiated Senate Inquiry on air quality will focus on the health impacts of coal.’ • South West and Brisbane metropolitan rail corridor ‘coal dust’ health issue
6. Build a powerful movement Create stronger networks and alliances and build the power necessary to win larger victories over time • Graeme Wood (Wotif) and David Thomas (Cellarmasters) Foundation supporters • Global players – 350.org, Pew Centre, Rockefeller Foundation, Sierra Club, Greenpeace • Brisbane WWF office now paying 20 staff
Western/metropolitan rail corridor dust management plan
Stop Brisbane Coal Trains – anti
coal movement campaign at work
Fears raised with local communities
about ‘coal dust health problems’
arising from coal transported to Port
of Brisbane. Real focus is stopping
all coal exports.
Industry users’ group on front foot,
preparing Dust Management Plan
incorporating results of independent
scientific testing
Users Group: New Hope Group, Peabody Energy, Yancoal Australia; supply chain
service providers Aurizon, Queensland Rail and Queensland Bulk Handling
•Baseline PM2.5/PM10 monitoring for two months
• Oakey • Toowoomba • Ipswich • Tennyson • Fairfield • Coorparoo • Chelmer (control)
Proactive industry response
Media overreaction – instant health ‘crisis’ despite no scientific evidence
Proactive industry response
The coal industry funded testing and monitoring at seven sites builds on the Queensland Government’s Tennyson Dust Monitoring Investigation in September 2012 which found: -No exceedances of dust and air quality objectives - Deposited dust samples showed coal dust at 10-20% of total dust was not the major source of dust
Map showing the location of the monitoring sites at Tennyson in relation to the rail corridor.
The next phase New Acland (Jondaryan) mine
began profiling, veneering in May.
Monitoring to measure ‘before’ and
‘after’ scenarios. Evaluation reports
to be published.
Longer-term continuous monitoring
and near real time reporting
All mines using Port of Brisbane on
board, consistent with CQ dust
suppression commitments
Anti-coal movement reaction ‘Health professionals are among the most trusted people in the Australian community. By amplifying their voices in the coal debate, we can powerfully shift public sentiment against the coal industry in general and against specific projects in particular.’
Anti-fossil fuels movement
unconstrained by facts
Industry is up against well funded and highly organised Green groups who don’t feel constrained by the facts. They claim that by 2020/22 there will be 11,000 coal ships and 1 billion tonnes of coal carried through Reef Industry will calmly present facts eg state government estimates of about 3000 coal and LNG ships and 300M tonnes of coal (180M in 2012)
Queensland coal sector
growth in perspective
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
Mtp
a
Year
Queensland coal exports: actual and likely growth cf Greenpeace estimates
Actual Greenpeace Likely
Source: ABARES, QRC estimates, Greenpeace 'Boom Goes the Reef'
CAGR 5.4%
CAGR 19%
CAGR 6%
CAGR – Compound Annual Growth Rate
Michael Roche
Chief Executive
Environmental Management in Materials Handling 5 June 2013
Working with communities to mitigate environmental issues