michigan connected and automated vehicle working group · 2017-12-04 · michigan connected and...

Michigan Connected and

Automated Vehicle

Working Group

October 26, 2017

Meeting Packet

1. Agenda

2. Meeting Notes

3. Attendance List

4. Presentations

Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle

Working Group

October 26, 2017

UMTRI Library Conference Room

2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Meeting Agenda

01:00 PM Introductions and Update

Valerie Sathe Brugeman, Senior Project Manager, CAR

01:10 PM Welcome at UMTRI

Francine Romine, Director of Marketing and Communications, University of Michigan

Transportation Research Institute

01:20 PM Southeast Michigan Strategic Growth Plan for CAV Assets

Valerie Sathe Brugeman, Senior Project Manager, CAR

01:40 PM Advanced Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Technologies

Jane K. Peterson, Program Manager, 3M™ Connected Roads

01:55 PM Hot Topics Discussion

Eric Paul Dennis, Senior Transportation Systems Analyst, CAR

02:25 PM Networking Break

02:40 PM Planet M as a Service

Trevor Pawl, Group Vice President, Planet M, Michigan Economic Development Corporation

03:00 PM Move 139

Mark De la Vergne, Chief of Mobility Innovation, City of Detroit

03:20 PM U.S. DOT Center for Connected and Automated Transportation Overview

Debby Bezzina, Senior Program Manager, University of Michigan Transportation Research

Institute

03:40 PM Automated Vehicle Deployments at University of Michigan

Carrie Morton, Deputy Director, Mcity

04:00 PM Walking tour of Mcity

05:00 PM Adjourn

Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle

Working Group

October 26, 2017

UMTRI Library Conference Room

2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

The Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Working Group held its fall meeting on October 26, 2017 at University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) library in Ann Arbor. More than 90 members of the Working Group attended this meeting.

Meeting Notes Valerie Sathe Brugeman, Senior Project Manager at the Center for Automotive Research (CAR), started the meeting by reviewing the agenda and Working Group mission. Next, she presented noteworthy news and upcoming events related to connected and automated vehicles (CAV). Mrs. Brugeman mentioned the ITS World Congress (October 29 - November 2, 2017, Montreal), the Automotive Tech.AD Detroit (November 16, 2017, Southfield), and the Automotive ISAC Summit (December 13-14, 2017, Dearborn). Francine Romine, UMTRI Director of Marketing and communication, welcomed the meeting participants at the UMTRI library. Ms. Romine introduced the mission of UMTRI and talked about the history of research on connected and automated technology at UMTRI. Since its beginning, UMTRI has conducted thousands of research projects, collected hundreds of terabytes of data and now is the sixth largest research institute on campus in terms of research expenditures, bringing in over $20 million in research annually. UMTRI’s multidisciplinary research includes short- and long-term projects in areas of involving crash data collection and traffic safety analysis, bioengineering, human factors, mechanical engineering, psychology, economics, and public policy. Francine also pointed to the safety and security of connected and automated technologies as one of the biggest challenges for everyone who works on these technologies and asked the audience to think about their role, from their individual area of expertise, to ensure the safety of CAVs.

Valerie Sathe Brugeman, Senior Project Manager at CAR, presented a recent publication from CAR, funded by the Advance Michigan Defense Collaborative. The Southeast Michigan Strategic Growth Plan for CAV Assets is aimed to identify opportunities for enhancing the region’s CAV environment. Mrs. Brugeman stated that this project was also a bridge between the defense and automotive sectors to achieve greater collaborations. The benchmark analysis compared Southeast Michigan to Silicon Valley, Seattle, and Pittsburgh on a variety of metrics. CAR researchers also developped a matrix of strengths, weaknesses, and threats for the Southeast Michigan CAV efforts. The outcome of this study is a CAV strategic plan for Southeast Michigan that contains a set of strategies on regional assets, marketing, investment attraction, education and workforce, and regional collaboration.

2

Jane Peterson, Program Manager at 3M, gave an overview of 3M’s efforts on connected roads and intelligent infrastructure. Ms. Peterson also talked about the I-75 corridor project, part of phase two of Michigan’s 10-year plan to update I-75 in the metro Detroit area. This is a 3.3-mile stretch of highway outfitted with 3M™ Connected Roads prototypes that are being tested with automotive industry partners. The main objectives of this project are to test and review the 3M Smart Code Sign and Pavement Markings with automakers, suppliers, and MDOT to gain insights into future needs. 3M Smart Code Signs can be read by vehicle sensors from 328 feet and at a speed of 60 mph. Jane stated that 3M has plans to test these signs under different weather, visibility, and intensity conditions to optimize the system for better reading of signs.

Eric Paul Dennis, Senior Transportation Systems Analyst at CAR, moderated a discussion with the Working Group members around the current events in the CAV environment. First, Eric reviewed state-by-state regulations and mentioned that a “call for study” is the most popular form of collaboration from state agencies. Then, some of the participants talked about how state regulations have affected their organizations. Since its release in 2016 and its update in 2017, the Federal Automated Vehicle Policy has been a hot topic for many of CAV discussions. According to Mr. Dennis, this document mostly contains recommendations for states, is not mandatory or nor binding. Mr. Dennis also briefly discussed the Self Drive Act and current Senate bill, the AV Start Act. The last discussion topic was the CAV deployment timeline, where the progress in CAV technology development was discussed.

After a short break, Trevor Pawl, Group Vice President at Michigan Economic Development Corporation, spoke about the history of PlanetM and the current transition from promoting PlanetM as a place to a customer service model. Under the new framework, PlanetM is intended to identify the main services already being offered in Michigan, pack them into a concierge-style and always-on program for the mobility sector. Mr. Pawl also gave a summary of current PlanetM efforts, including but not limited to connections between software developers and hardware suppliers, communication with technology leaders and venture capitalists in Silicon Valley, and collaboration with WeWork on the PlanetM Landing Zone, which hosts technology startups in Detroit.

The next speaker, Mark De la Vergne, Chief of Mobility Innovation at the City of Detroit, briefly overviewed innovative mobility projects and pilots in Detroit. According to Mark, the mission of the Office of Mobility is to integrate innovative mobility technologies into the current transportation systems and provide inclusive, integrated, safe, and data-driven mobility services for everyone in the city. To achieve this goal, the City of Detroit is working closely with federal and state agencies, research institutes, technology developers, and mobility service providers. After reviewing some of the ongoing projects in City of Detroit, Mr. De la Vergne finished his presentation by announcing the release of future request for proposals for the smart city strategic plan in 2018.

Debby Bezzina, Managing Director at UMTRI, started her presentation by explaining the ongoing efforts within the USDOT Center for Connected and Automated Transportation (CCAT) including the Ann Arbor Connected and Automated Vehicle Test Environment. Mrs. Bezzina stated that CCAT strives to become a thought-leading group in the connected and automated transportation space to impact research, science, education, training, and deployment. Besides of CAV research, CCTA’s focus is on leadership development (student competition, MiTSO, among others), education and workforce development (CAT Certificate), and the CCAT outreach technology transfer (website, seminars, research symposiums, internship program, K-12 outreach).

Finally, Carrie Morton, Deputy Director at Mcity, presented an introduction of MCity. The facility is a 32-acre site on the campus of University of Michigan and is the first purpose-built CAV test facility with

3

simulated urban and suburban driving environments. According to Ms. Morton, Mcity has the largest DSRC fleet in the country including 1500 vehicles. The data from vehicles and roadside units are being used for research in user acceptance and behavior, and development artificial intelligence algorithms. The University of Michigan’s TechLab at Mcity is an incubator for early-stage mobility companies in the CAV industry. The incubator places a heavy emphasis on student learning by matching emerging transportation startups with students interested in applying classroom learning to practical technology development. As a part of the incubator program, companies receive access to student interns, University of Michigan experts, and resources.

MDOT maintains a webpage dedicated to its work related to CAV technologies (http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7-151-9621_11041_38217---,00.html). The page includes documents, presentations, and other materials that may be of interest to CAV stakeholders. Meeting packets containing materials (e.g., agenda, meeting notes, attendance, and presentation slides) from past Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Working Group meetings can also be found on the page in the bottom right corner under the heading Connected Vehicles Working Group.

http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7-151-9621_11041_38217---,00.html


Automated Vehicle

Working Group

Attendance List October 26, 2017

First name Last name Organization Position Email

Richard Allen Bosch Manager, Market Research

[email protected]

Niles Annelin MDOT Project Manager [email protected] Sergei Avedisov University of

Michigan Graduate Student [email protected]

Zahra Bahrani Fard

CAR Transportation Systems Analyst

[email protected]

Tom Beach SRG Global VP of Business Development and Manufacturing Planning

[email protected]

Dick Beaubien Beaubien Engineering

Managing Director [email protected]

Debra Bezzina UMTRI Senior Program Manager

[email protected]

Subir Biswas Michigan State University

[email protected]

Sam Boumis Scofes & Associates

[email protected]

Danielle Bowman WIN Project Assistant [email protected] Valerie Brugeman CAR Senior Project

Manager [email protected]

Mark Curtis Accenture Global Director-Ecosystem and Client Services

[email protected]

Mark Davids Connected and Automated Vehicle Education Network

Board of Directors [email protected]

Mark De La Vergne

City of Detroit Chief of Mobility Innovation

[email protected]

Eric Paul Dennis CAR Senior Transportation Systems Analyst

[email protected]

Gregg Dunn UAW Coordinator [email protected]

Brandy Goolsby Wind River Senior Manager, Business Development

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]







Lisa Hart CAR Sr. Vice President, Operations

[email protected]

Chaozhe He University of Michigan

PhD student [email protected]

Qiang Hong CAR Sr. Research Scientist [email protected]

Ahmad Jawad RCOC Signal Systems Engineer/ITS Manager

[email protected]

Murali Jp Mindtree Sr. Director - Automotive Business Leader

[email protected]

Kevin Kelly Eisbrenner Public Relations

Vice President [email protected]

Johanna Kinsler SRG Global Innovation Engineer [email protected] Matt Klawon AECOM

[email protected]

Marc Kull WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc

Automotive Contract Manager

[email protected]

Alan Lecz Washtenaw CC Director - Advanced Transportation Center

[email protected]

Luke Liu City of Ann Arbor Traffic Engineer [email protected] Christyn Lucas Detroit Regional

Chamber Business Research Analyst

[email protected]

Robert Marz MDOT ITS Project Manager [email protected]

Juliana Matos Freudenberg-NOK

[email protected]

Heinz Mattern Magna Product Director Near Field

[email protected]

Katie McLaughlin WSP Associate Consultant [email protected]

Monika Minarcin Accenture Manager, Industry X.0 [email protected] Carrie Morton Mcity Deputy Director [email protected]

Mahendra Muli dSpace Director, Marketing and New Business Development

[email protected]

Mike Mulligan PPG Global Product Manager

[email protected]

Andrew Nam Stoneridge Business Development

[email protected]

Trevor Pawl MEDC Vice President [email protected]

Frank Perry Savari Sr. Program Manager [email protected] Jane Peterson 3M Transportation

Safety Division Program Manager, 3M™ Connected Roads

[email protected]

Heidi Pfannes Albert Kahn Associates, Inc.

Business Development Manager, Marketing Manager

[email protected]

Seun Phillips MEDC Director of Planet M

Mike Pinelis MEMS Journal, Inc. CEO [email protected]

Dan Rochon Macomb County Associate Planner [email protected]

















Francine Romine UMTRI Director of Marketing and Communications

[email protected]

Amanda Roraff MEDC

[email protected]

Anna Rossi Valeo Product Marketing Analyst

[email protected]

Phil Santer Ann Arbor SPARK

[email protected] Ann Schlenker Argonne National

Laboratory Director, Center for Transportation Research

[email protected]

Stephen Selander Selander Law Office, PLLC

Principal [email protected]

Ayush Shah Ford Motor Company

[email protected]

Scott Shogan WSP C/AV Market Leader [email protected]

Bill Shreck MDOT Interdepartmental Liaison

[email protected]

Andrew Simpson Mitsubishi Motors Engineer - Advanced Vehicle Electronics

[email protected]

Jeffrey Skvarce Continental Engineering Manager - Vehicle System Test and Verification

[email protected]

Matt Smith Michael Baker International

C/AV Program Manager

[email protected]

Wayne Snyder NextEnergy Director Technology Development

[email protected]

Gary Streelman Magneti Marelli Director, Advanced Engineering & New Concepts

[email protected]

Bill Tansil MDOT Division Administrator

[email protected]; [email protected]

Therese Thill The Right Place Vice President, Business Development

[email protected]

Jennifer Tisdale Mazda North American Operations

Program Manger, Cyber Automotive

[email protected]

Kellie Treppa ON Semiconductor Business Development Key Accounts Automotive

[email protected]

Tricia Walding WIN-SEMich Senior Program Manager

[email protected]

Brad Warner Lambert, Edwards & Associated

Senior Director [email protected]

Rick Warner TSPS, Inc. President / Director [email protected] John Wright Burris Law, PLLC Intellectual Property

Attorney [email protected]

Ali Zockaie Michigan State University

Assistant Professor [email protected]


















Automated Vehicle

Working Group

Presentations

Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Working GroupUniversity of Michigan Transportation Research Institute | Ann Arbor, MI

26 October 2017

2

Meeting Agenda

CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH

1:00 PM Introductions and Update

Valerie Sathe Brugeman, Senior Project Manager, CAR2:40 PM Planet M as a Service

Trevor Pawl, Group Vice President, Planet M, Michigan Economic

Development Corporation

1:10 PM Welcome at UMTRI

Francine Romine , Director of Marketing and

Communications, University of Michigan Transportation

Research Institute

3:00 PM Move 139

Mark De la Vergne, Chief of Mobility Innovation, City of Detroit

1:20 PM Southeast Michigan Strategic Growth Plan for CAV Assets

Valerie Sathe Brugeman, Senior Project Manager, CAR3:20 PM U.S. DOT Center for Connected and Automated Transportation

Overview

Debby Bezzina, Senior Program Manager, University of Michigan

Transportation Research Institute

1:40 PM Advanced Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Technologies

Jane K. Peterson, Program Manager, 3M™ Connected

Roads

Michele Mueller, Senior Project Manager, Michigan

Department of Transportation

3:40 PM Automated Vehicle Deployments at University of Michigan

Carrie Morton, Deputy Director, Mcity

4:00 PM Walking tour of Mcity

1:55 PM Hot Topics Discussion

Eric Paul Dennis, Transportation Systems Analyst, CAR5:00 PM Adjourn

2:25 PM Networking Break

3

Working Group Mission

Cooperatively pursue projects and other activities that are best accomplishedthrough partnerships between multiple agencies, companies, universities, andother organizations and that ultimately advance Michigan’s leadership position inconnected and automated vehicle research, deployment, and operations.

Goals

• Benefit our state and our industry (automotive and more)

• Enhance safety and mobility in Michigan and beyond


4

Upcoming Connected and Automated Vehicle Events

• ITS World Congress: October 29-November 2, 2017, Montréal

• Automotive Tech.AD Detroit: November 16, 2017, Southfield

• LA Auto Show: December 1-10, 2017, Los Angeles

• 2017 MICHauto Summit: December 5, 2017, Detroit

• Automotive ISAC Summit: December 13-14, 2017, Dearborn

• CAR Artificial Intelligence Industry Briefing: February 15, 2017, Livonia


University of MichiganTransportation Research Institute

50 Years of Leadership, Scholarship, and Impact

Francine Romine Director, Marketing and Communications

Over 50 years of:

• Impacting the lives of motor-vehicle occupants • Research findings with influence• Making motor-vehicle travel safer overall

Early Research Areas Included:

• Attitudes of drivers• Influence of drugs and alcohol• Road design• Vehicle engineering• Tire-road interaction• Vehicle dynamics • Influence of laws and standards on driving• The effects of crashes on human bodies

Our Research Advances Continue:

• Thousands of research projects• Hundreds of terabytes of data • Sixth largest research institute

on campus• Short- and long-term studies

Relevant and Interdisciplinary:

• Over 1.5 million publication downloads in Deep Blue since 2006• 100 faculty and staff with deep breadth and expertise• Collaborative research across campus and beyond

Our Research Structure:

UMTRI’s research expertise is organized by multi-disciplinary groups, all with the same goal in mind: To eliminate the negative effects our current transportation system has on society.

• Safety Pilot Model Deployment• Ann Arbor Connected Vehicle Test

Environment• US DOT Center for Connected and

Automated Transportation

University of MichiganTransportation Research Institute

Southeast Michigan Strategic Growth Plan for CAV AssetsValerie Sathe Brugeman | Senior Project Manager

26 October 2017

2

Agenda

• Background

• Benchmark

• SWOT Analysis

• Regional Strategic Plan for Southeast Michigan


Background

CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH 3

4

Purpose

• Identify opportunities to enhance the region’s connected and automated vehicle (CAV) environment

• Explore ways defense and automotive sectors can achieve greater collaboration

• Funded by the Advance Michigan Defense Collaborative, through a Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment Defense Industry Adjustment Grant


5

Plan Development Methodology

• Benchmark analysis comparing a variety of metrics in Southeast Michigan with those in:

• Silicon Valley

• Seattle

• Pittsburgh

• Additional region forthcoming

• SWOT analysis primarily informed from expert interviews

• Regional CAV asset maps of Southeast Michigan


Benchmark


7

Benchmark Comparison


Manufacturing Intensity*: 0.89Unemployment Rate: 5.3Patent per Capita: 0.01%Higher Education Degrees**: 7.8%


Manufacturing Intensity*: 1.39Unemployment Rate: 4.8

Patent per Capita: 0.18%Higher Education Degrees**: 12.9%


8

Percent of Public & Private CAV R&D Investment by Region, 2015


0%

100%

TOTAL $44.5B

Public Private

70%

11%

11%

8%

PUBLIC $66.7M

Silicon Valley Detroit Seattle Pittsburgh

65%

25%

7%

3%

PRIVATE $44.4B

Silicon Valley Detroit Seattle Pittsburgh

Source: National Science Foundation; U.S. Census

9

Venture Capital Investment in CAV-Related Fields, by CSA, 2015


0.6%

0.7%

4.7%

94.0% 6.0%

Detroit Pittsburgh Seattle Silicon Valley

Source: National Venture Capital Association

10

Commercialization Gap by State


$149

$39

$30

$7

$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160

Michigan

Pennsylvania

Washington

California

Source: Renaissance Venture Capital Fund, based on survey data from National Science Foundation,National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, and Michigan Venture Capital Association

Note: Commercialization gap defined as the dollar amount spent for R&D per $1 of venture capital investment.

11

Legal Regulations & Government Strategy


• Legal & Regulatory Framework: • M Plate

• Government:• Council on Future Mobility –

2016• CAV Working Group – 2010• Planet M – 2016• Smart Belt Coalition with Ohio

& Pennsylvania

PITTSBURGH SEATTLE SILICON VALLEYLegal & Regulatory Framework:

• No Specific Regulations• High-Profile Locations for

CAV development – Uber & CMU

Government:• Autonomous Vehicle Policy

Task Force – 2016• Pittsburgh Technology

Council• Finalist in U.S. DOT Smart City

Challenge

Legal & Regulatory Framework:• No Specific Regulations

Government:• Innovation Triangle –

Bellevue, Redmond, & Kirkland

• Cascadia Innovation Corridor – Province of British Columbia & Washington, 2016

Legal & Regulatory Framework:• Most elaborate & detailed

among all regions• Testing – Permit, accident

report, annual report• Commercial – different then

testing; final regulations yet to be adopted

Government:• Autotech Council – 2012• SEMI • San Francisco finalist in U.S.

DOT Smart City Challenge

DETROIT

Strengths, Weaknesses, (Opportunities) and Threats


13

SWOT - Strengths, Weaknesses, and Threats


STRENGTHS• Entire automotive ecosystem here• Unique knowledge of internal vehicle technology• Strong public sector cooperation (regulations,

test facilities, demonstrations)• Strong employee work ethic• Affordable place to do business• High quality of life

WEAKNESSES• Shortage of necessary talent• Not garnering big investment dollars• Shortage of forums connecting start-ups &

established companies

THREATS• Many regions compete for CAV leadership• Better regional cooperation elsewhere• Lack of robust marketing coordination • Security concerns prevent sharing of relevant

information between sectors• Lack of robust talent pipeline• Cautious approach to managing risk

Southeast MichiganCAV Strategic Plan


15

Regional Strategic Plan Overview


Strategic Growth Plan for

CAV Assets in Southeast

Michigan

• Increase relationship-building events• Market collective CAV assets better• Encourage local and non-local

investment• Collaborate more as an industry and

across auto & defense sectors• Attract and retain talent• Ensure ACM is successful

OPPORTUNITIES

Greater Collaboration

Regional Geographic

Assets

Education & Workforce

Investment Attraction

Market Region Better

16

Greater Collaboration • Align regional leaders

• Improve auto and defense industry collaboration

• Increase networking opportunities

• Enhance start-up and smaller business ecosystem


17

Regional Geographic Assets

• Robust test environments & facilities

• MCity

• ACM

• International crossings with Canada

• Cross-border testing

• Michigan-Ontario Memorandum of Understanding


18

Education and Workforce • Reinforce links between automotive/defense industries and educational institutions

• Strengthen CAV-related academic offerings

• Provide amenities or incentives to attract highly-skilled workers

• Organize job fairs specific to CAV technology


19

Investment Attraction • Increase venture capital investment in regional companies

• Leverage regional assets to increase investment

• Stimulate patent creation


20

Market Region Better • Continue to market nationally and internationally

• Attract start-ups/talent

• Break automotive industry stigmas


THANK YOU

Current Events Discussion

Facilitator: Eric Paul Dennis, Senior Analyst, CARMichigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Working Group

October 26, 2017

2

Topics • State-by-state Regulations

• NHTSA Automated Vehicle Policy Document (2017 Update)

• Pending Federal Legislation (AV SAVE Act)

• V2V Mandate

• NTSB Report on Tesla Autopilot Fatality

• Timeline to Deployment


3

State-by-state Regulations

Introduce

Definitions

Regulate

Testing

Regulate

Deployment

Address

LiabilityCall for Study

Permit

Platooning

Local

Preemption

Alabama X

Arizona X X

Arkansas X

Cal i fornia X X X X

Colorado X X X X

Connecticut X X X X X

Delaware X

Florida X X X

Georgia X X X X X

I l l inois X X

Louis iana X

Michigan X X X X X X X

Nevada X X X X

New York X X X

North Carol ina X X X X X

North Dakota X

Pennsylvania

South Carol ina X

Tennessee X X X X X

Texas X X X X X

Utah X X X

Virginia

Vermont X

Washington X X

Washington DC X X X

Wisconsin X


4

NHTSA Automated Vehicle Guidelines

• 2017 update to 2016 document

• Nothing mandatory or binding

• Manufacturers are encouraged to publish “Voluntary Safety Self-Assessment” (12 elements)

• Advice for states

• Reminder of existing NHTSA authorities

• Accepting Comments


5

Federal Legislation


• House bill, “SELF DRIVE Act” • Passed full house

• Senate Bill, “AV START Act” • Passed senate committee

• Next steps• Full Senate mark-up and vote

• House re-vote

• President signs

SELF DRIVE Act• State Preemption

• FMVSS Exemption

• FMVSS Expedited Resolution of Standards

• Other Provisions• Safety Evaluation Report• Committees, Working Groups, Research• Two-year hold on vehicle cybersecurity

rulemakings (pending study)• Adopt Rule on Consumer Education• Create Privacy Database• Adopt Rear-seat Reminder Rule

6

National Connected Vehicle Mandate

• Notice of Proposed Rule-making (NPRM) released Dec. 13, 2016

• USDOT Pilots ongoing

• Conflict with Executive Order 13771

• September Significant Rulemaking Report lists V2V mandate as “undetermined”


Dedicated Short-range Communications (DSRC)

V2V, V2I, V2X

7

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Investigation Report on Tesla Autopilot Fatality


8

Timeline to Deployment

Audi “Traffic Jam Pilot”(Level 3)

Audi “Highway Pilot”(Level 4)

Lyft/GM Automated Taxis (Level 4)

Mercedes “Autonomous Drive” (Level 4)

Volvo“DriveME” 100-car Pilot

(Level 3/4?)

FordAutomated Ridesharing (Level 4)

BMW“Highly/Fully Autonomous”(Level 4/5?)

UberAutonomous Taxis(Level 4)

Volvo(Level 4)

BoschLevel 3 Platform

Honda“Automated HW Driving”

(Level 3?)

Nissan “Autonomous Drive”

(Level 3?)

Mobileye/Delphi“Automated

Driving Solution”(Level 3/4?)

2getthereOn-road driverless shuttle(Level 4 limited ODD)

Google?Tesla?

Toyota “Chauffeur”

Volkswagen

Navya/MCityOn-road driverless shuttle

(Level 4 limited ODD)

• SAE Level 3, 4, or 5 (ADS)• Public Road• Mixed Vehicle Traffic• No Monitoring


CAV WORKING GROUP OVERVIEW

Two reasons driverless vehicles will be common by 2030: Desire + Fear.

#1: Desire to Change the World

#2: Fear of Getting iPod-ed

The new driverless vehicle economy could be worth $800 billion by 2035, and $7 trillion by 2050.

Analysts predict new car ownership in the America will peak before 2026.

What is Michigan Doing? Three Things.

1st Thing: Testing and Research: Mcity

1st Thing: Testing and Research: ACM

1st Thing: Testing and Research: MDOT

Legalized,

self driving,

ride sharing

Allows

truck platoons

Michigan is a Leader in Autonomous Vehicle Legislation

No driver

required

Testing &

Use on public

roads

Legal for

testing

Michigan Florida California Nevada Tennessee Washington

D.C.Arizona

2nd Thing: Progressive Legislation

Texas Georgia North

CarolinaIllinois ColoradoNorth

Dakota

Achieved Goal: Activate Mobility

Messaging

New Goal: More Client

Matchmaking

New Goal: Coordination

of Mobility Assets

New Goal: More Leads &

Deal Flow

Planet M 1.0 (Brand Awareness)

Planet M 2.0 (Brand Engagement)

• Timeframe: June 2016 to May 2017

• Objective: Promote PlanetM as a place

• Timeframe: June 2017 and beyond

• Objective: Promote PlanetM as a customer service model

3rd Thing:

PlanetM Vision Statement

Provide the world’s best customer service to companies

focused on mobility.

Current Value Propositions:

• Client Matchmaking

• Development Financing

• Site Location Assistance

• Soft Landing Zone Access

• MDOT Infrastructure Access

• Progressive Legislation

• Supplier Introductions

• Investor Introductions

• Testing Site Access

• Networking/Events

• Public Relations Support

PlanetM 2.0 (Value & Audiences)1. Identify Services

Already Offered2. Package Services into Concierge-Style, Always-On

Program for Mobility Sector

1. End-Customers 2. Evangelists 3. Stakeholders

• Mobility-Focused Growth Companies & Startups

• Global Tech Companies

• VC, Angel & Seed Investors

• Mobility-Focused Accelerators

• Michigan Auto Companies (OEMs, Tier 1 and 2 Suppliers)

• Site Consultants

• Labs & Agencies

• Service Providers

• Economic Development Partners

• Planet M Assets

• Legislators

More Brand AwarenessGoal 1

• Media Impressions• Testimonials

More Customer ConnectionsGoal 2

• Company-To-Company Matches• Facilitated Jobs ($200k in contract equals 1 job)

More Coordination of Mobility AssetsGoal 3

• Testing Site and Data Usage• Pilot Programs Facilitated

More MEDC Leads and Deal FlowGoal 4

• Project Opportunities Generated• Mobility-Focused Investment (Job Creation)

PlanetM 2.0 (Measuring Success)

Business Plan Approved, FY17 Funding Granted

PlanetM Hiring Plan Approved;

Stakeholder Meetings Begin

May2017

Jul2017

FY18 PlanetMBudget Approved

Jun2017

PlanetMLanding Zone & San Francisco Satellite Opens

Aug2017

Sep2017

PlanetM Services Launch: NAIAS AutoMobiliD Match Meetings & Awards, Media

Tour Service, Hardware and Software Supplier Tours;

PlanetM Team Hired; Mission Control Partner Group Formed

PlanetM Board Formed; New PlanetM Services

Launch: Investor Tours, Governor Delegation to

Silicon Valley.

Oct2017

Program Milestones:• PlanetM Operations• PlanetM People• PlanetM Services

Dec2017

Michigan Mobility Steering

Committee Forms to Coordinate

Assets: Startup Testing Subsidy

Program

Jan2018

PlanetM Services Launch: Assembly

Line Platform Development &

Funding Strategy Begins

Mar 2017

1st Program Phase: Program Setup,

Build/Test Service Model

2nd Program Phase: Program Scale,

Service Launch and Growth

Main Goal: To Build a Sustainable Business Development Model for PlanetM by January 2019

Nov2017

Jul 2017

Sep 2017




October 2017: PlanetM organized a California VC Visibility Tour. Group: Baidu Ventures, BMW iVentures, Siemens Ventures, Flex Ventures, Sherpa Capital, Maven Ventures, Auto Tech VC, DeNA(Nintendo) Ventures, Boom Capital, SAIC Ventures, Playground Global and Redpoint Ventures. In total we made 351 connections between this group and Michigan companies.

• “It was way beyond my expectation and I very much appreciate the insights and network I was given during the three days. I am looking forward to continuing the conversations initiated in Detroit and to telling you about the impact they would make to our business.” - Dai Watanabe, VP, Strategy, DeNA (Nintendo) Ventures

•“As a first timer in Detroit and Michigan, I returned with a great inspiration on how to be more involved in the region moving forward. I wish to explore ways of working together.” - Oshri Kaplan, Managing Director, Investments and Alliances, Flextronics Ventures

“The trip really was great and I appreciate you bringing me into the group. I am looking forward to coming back on my own dime and finding a great investment for Siemens and a great partnership with a local startup.” – Jason Sydow, Investment Partner, Siemens Ventures




In October 2017, in just over a day, the Governor had 50+ executive touches in Silicon Valley, engaging with:

• 4 Large Technology Companies: Intel, Google (Waymo), Cisco and NVIDIA• 15 mobility and software-based startups: Applied Intuition, Skydio, Skyryse, ZenDrive, LimeBike, Aurora Innovation,

Astra, Planet Labs, Hyperloop One, Kittyhawk, Lightfield Labs, ReGen Villages, Embark Technology, CRISPR, Singularity University

• 5 Venture Capital Firms/Banks: Sherpa Capital, Silicon Valley Bank, Andreesen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, Pinnacle Ventures

Business Plan Approved, FY17 Funding Granted

PlanetM Hiring Plan Approved;

Stakeholder Meetings Begin

May2017

Jul2017

FY18 PlanetMBudget Approved

Jun2017

PlanetMLanding Zone & San Francisco Satellite Opens

Aug2017

Sep2017

PlanetM Services Launch: NAIAS AutoMobiliD Match Meetings & Awards, Media

Tour Service, Hardware and Software Supplier Tours;

PlanetM Team Hired; Mission Control Partner Group Formed

PlanetM Board Formed; New PlanetM Services

Launch: Investor Tours, Governor Delegation to

Silicon Valley.

Oct2017

Program Milestones:• PlanetM Operations• PlanetM People• PlanetM Services

Dec2017

Michigan Mobility Steering

Committee Forms to Coordinate

Assets: Startup Testing Subsidy

Program

Jan2018

PlanetM Services Launch: Assembly

Line Platform Development &

Funding Strategy Begins

Mar 2017

1st Program Phase: Program Setup,

Build/Test Service Model

2nd Program Phase: Program Scale,

Service Launch and Growth

Main Goal: To Build a Sustainable Business Development Model for PlanetM by January 2019

Nov2017

Jul 2017

Sep 2017

CAV WORKING GROUP OVERVIEW

City of Detroit

Move 139

Office of Mobility Innovation Overview

October 26, 2017

Vision for Mobility in Detroit

Detroit is a city that is easy, safe, and affordable to get around.

Mobility Transformation in Detroit

Detroit is home to a 21st century mobility system that fully integrates traditional public transit with new mobility technologies and services.

Mobility service in Detroit is supported by a world class street network and supports the growth of the mobility innovation industry.

Mobility service:Transforming all aspects of

how people get around Detroit

Built environment:Building streets that are

walkable and bikeable for everyone

Economic development:Creating the environment for

Detroit to be the global epicenter for mobility

innovation

Key focus

are

as

Desired e

nd

sta

te

Office of Mobility Innovation

Office of Mobility Innovation Mission:

Integrate new mobility technologies and services into traditional work of transit, street design, traffic operations,and parking.

DDOT PDD DPW MPD

Detroit’s Core Innovation Values

• Inclusive• Integrated• Open• Data Driven

What We’re Working On

• Connected Corridors – FHWA award• Microtransit pilots• On-street car share pilot• Improving transit experience and technoogoy• Smart City Lab collaboration with seven other

cities• Initial ideation process with private industry• Mobility data strategy• Smart City strategy

Where We’re Going

• Community conversation around future of mobility in Detroit

• Full integration of public transit with microtransit• Open payment platform for mobility• Further applications of connected technology• Autonomous vehicle pilots around use cases• Predictive analytics• Industry partnerships around pilots• Building future business model of mobility

U.S. DOT Center for Connected and Automated

Transportation (CCAT)Henry Liu, Center Director

Debby Bezzina, Managing Director

Ann Arbor Connected Vehicle Test Environment

USDOT Region 5 UTC

• From Nov 30, 2016 – Sept 30, 2022

• Annual funding ~$2.6M

CCAT Research

2017 Research

Augmented Reality Testing and Simulation

CCAT Education

Certificate Program on Connected and Automated Transportation (15 Credits)

Core course #1: CAT Fundamentals

Core course #2: CAT Professional Practice

Three elective courses from:

– Infrastructure Systems

– Vehicle Technologies

– Urban Planning, Law, Business, etc.

Leadership Development

CCAT Student Competition

UTC Student of the Year

MiTSO Industry Speakers

Conference Fees

ITS MI

CCAT Outreach and Technology Transfer

• CCAT Website (ccat.umtri.umich.edu), Newsletter, etc.

• CCAT Distinguished Seminar Series (2 per year)• Save the date – April 11, 2017

• CCAT Annual Research Symposium• Student Competition

• Save the date – March 7-8, 2018

• Internship Program

• K-12 Outreach

Contact Information

Henry Liu, Ph.D.

Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering

Research Professor, UMTRI

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Phone: 734-764-4354

Fax: 734-764-4292

Email: [email protected]

Debby Bezzina

Managing Director, CCAT

Senior Program Manager, UMTRI

Connected Lead, Mcity

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Phone: 734-763-2498

Email: [email protected]

ccat.umtri.umich.edu

tel:734-764-4354

tel:734-764-4292


tel:734-764-4292


AN INTRODUCTION

CARRIE MORTONDEPUTY DIRECTOR

A PUBLIC/PRIVATE R&D PARTNERSHIP THAT WILL LEAD

A REVOLUTION IN MOBILITY AND DEVELOP THE FOUNDATIONS OF A COMMERCIALLY VIABLE ECOSYSTEM OF CONNECTED AND AUTOMATED VEHICLES

Even more relevant todayMCITY

THE SPEED OF INVENTION IS OUTPACING PREVIOUS EXPECTATIONS & REGULATIONS

THE RULES OF THE ROAD HAVE YET TO BE F INALIZED

DATA, DATA, DATA

• OEMs + Suppliers• Infrastructure providers• Insurance• Mobility Services• Startups• An undergrad with an app

U N C O V E R N E W B U S I N E S S M O D E L S

R E S E A R C H

LABS

A UNIQUE COMBINATION E D U C AT I O N

& O U T R E A C H

PARTNERSHIPS

RESEARCH

MODELS

SCALED DEPLOYMENTS

LIVING LABS L e a r n i n g b y d o i n g

• Real roadway attributes• V2V playground• V2I capability• Emerging Smart City

Concepts• Students, Faculty,

Industry, and Government

MCITY TEST FACILITY A P L A C E T O E X P L O R E

ON THE ROAD

LIVING LABS• Largest DSRC fleet in the US | 1,500 vehicles

• Dense V2I footprint | 30 intersections

• 4 years of CAV data to LC members

• Pedestrian safety function using DSRC

• Fleet of CAVs

L E A D I N G T H E R E V O L U T I O N

OPEN CAV PROJECT

SWISS ARMY OF INNOVATION• Open - Faculty, students, industry

• Full suite of Lidar, Radar, cameras, GPS..

• ROS controls – a shared platform

Demo & Testing

• Connected enabling automated

• Augmented Reality

I N N O VAT I O N P L AT F O R M

Arma Deployment ProjectTwo NAVYA Shuttles

Mcity research project, collecting data for

– User acceptance– User behavior– Machine vision, artificial

intelligence

H I T T I N G T H E S T R E E T S

DATA ACUISITION I N F O R M I N G R E S E A R C H

• Interior camera(s)– Human behavior, human acceptance

• External cameras– Behavior of other road users (focus on pedestrians, cyclists)

• Wifi– Tracking ridership and usage pattern

• Subject survey– Passengers– Conductor– Other road users

K EY BENEFITS W H AT W I L L W E L E A R N ?

• Legal/regulation/insurance exercise• Data• User acceptance/behavior• Gain experience of low-speed L4 AV deployment

PRE-COMPETITIVE RESEARCH

BARRIERS

• User t rus t & accep tance• Lega l , l i ab i l i t y &

i nsu rance• Marke t adopt ion• Pr i vacy and secur i t y• AV tes t ing and eva lua t ion

INSIGHTS

• Soc ie ta l impac t , energy, sa fe ty

• Connec t i v i t y enab led AV• New bus iness mode ls

Wo r k i n g To g e t h e r

A bold experiment that pairs top-tier resources with early stage technology development companies to spur automated and connected innovations.

[email protected]

michigan connected and automated vehicle working group · 2017-12-04 · michigan connected and...

Documents