mid day meal scheme

1

Mid Day Meal Scheme

Ministry of HRDGovernment of India

PAB-MDM Meeting – Maharashtra19.02.2013

Review of Implementation of MDMS in MAHARASHTRA

(Primary + Upper Primary)

(1.4.2012 to 31.12.2012)

Part-I

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

Performance of Primary during the year

82% 89% 97%60% 59% 65%

0%

50%

100%Co

vera

geag

ainst

Enro

llmet

Cove

rage

again

st PA

BAp

prova

l

Work

ing D

ay FGUti

lisati

on

Cook

ing Co

stUti

lisati

on

Hono

. toCo

ok-cu

m-

helpe

r


Performance of Upper Primary during the year

80% 93% 98%

63% 62% 65%

0%

50%

100%

Cove

rage

agai

nst

Enro

llmet

Cove

rage

agai

nst P

ABAp

prov

al

Wor

king

Day

FG U

tilisa

tion

Cook

ing

Cost

Utilis

ation

Hono

. to

Cook

-cum

-he

lper


Coverage : Institutions : Approval Vs Achievement (Pry)

84016 81485 8191581116 81665

47358

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

PAB Approval Achievement


No.

of

Insti

tuti

on

s

99% 97%58%

The state has informed that in 2012-13 by mistake there was double counting of Primary schools with the result 81915 primary institutions were approved by PAB 2012-13. The actual no. of primary schools in the State are 47400 which has also been verified by the MIS portal. Against this 47358 institutions have covered under MDM which is 100%

Coverage Institutions : Approval Vs Achievement (U. Pry)

38822 39478 3990639236 39679 37422

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13



No.

of

Insti

tuti

on

s

100% 101% 94%

The state has informed that in 2012-13 by mistake there was incorrect counting of Upper Primary schools with the result 39906 upper primary institutions were approved by PAB 2012-13. The actual no. of Upper primary schools in the State are 37631 which has also been verified by the MIS portal. Against this 37422 institutions have covered under MDM which is 100%

86 85 81 7883 80 75 7271 70 68 64

0

20

40

60

80

100

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Enrolment PAB Approval Achievement

Children : Achievement Vs Enrolment & Approval (Pry) N

o.

of

Ch

ild

ren

(in

lakh

s)

86% 88% 91%


83% 82% 84%

89%

82%

48 49 4946

40 42 41 4039 39 39 37

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Enrolment PAB Approval Achievement

Children : Achievement Vs Enrolment & Approval (U. Pry) N

o.

of

Ch

ild

ren

(in

lakh

s)

98% 93% 95%


81% 80% 80%

93%

80%

Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement (Pry)

161 158 150 155153142 143 151

0

40

80

120

160

200

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13PAB Approval Achievement


No.

of

Work

ing

Days

90% 95% 95%

In Washim 124, Yeotmal 137,Nanded 138 & Nasik 139 days covered only

97%

Coverage : Working Days Approval Vs Achievement (U.Pry)

161 158 150 155153142 141 152

0

40

80

120

160

200

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13



No.

of

Work

ing

Days

90% 94% 95%

In Washim 140, Yeotmal & Nanded 138 days covered only

98%

Approval Vs Achievement: Number of Meals (Pry + UPry.)

197 193174 174167

154 152 154

0

50

100

150

200

250

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Approval Achievement


No.

of

Meals

(in

cro

re)

85% 80% 87% 89%

FOOD GRAIN : ALLOCATION vs. UTILISATION

328359300446 286763 297173

184409 180393 178012 181940

0

70000

140000

210000

280000

350000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Allocation

Utilisation


Qu

an

tity

in

MTs

56% 62%60% 61%

Utilization upto 3rd QTR against annual allocation

Foodgrains : Availability & Utilization (1.4.12 to 31.12.12)

297173

215319181940

0

70000

140000

210000

280000

350000

Allocation

Availability

Utilization


Qu

an

tity

in

MTs

O.B. 25891 MTs was available with the State

100%

72% 61%

Foodgrains Availability – Dist. wise


Special focus Dist.: Mumbai (46%)

2

10

Below 60%

61% - 70%

Above 70%22

State Level : 72%

Foodgrains Utilisation – Dist. wise


Special focus Dist.: Pune (48%), Buldana (49%), Nanded (53%) Dhule &Jalana (56%)

11

19

4Below 60%

61% - 70%

Above 70%

State Level : 61%

Low Foodgrains Utilization – Dist. wise

Districts Allocation Utilization % UtilizationPune 25222.78 12019.91 48%

Buldhana 8085.97 3980.94 49%

Nanded 9848.56 5144.37 52%

Mumbai 22393.45 12097.95 54%

Dhule 6214.69 3451.43 56%

Jalana 6395.10 3610.22 56%

Nandurbar 4705.65 2669.05 57%

Washim 3773.65 2152.94 57%


Low Cooking Cost Utilization – Dist. wise

Districts Allocation Utilization % UtilizationPune 7829.67 3694.20 47%

Buldhana 2511.02 1228.20 49%Nanded 3059.16 1583.62 52%Mumbai 6953.01 3713.44 53%Dhule 1930.17 1065.26 55%Nandurbar 1461.82 819.34 56%Jalana 1986.42 1115.65 56%Washim 1171.99 660.72 56%


Food grains utilization: Expected Vs Actual

186304 181940

0

80000

160000

240000

Expected Actual


98%

Cooking Cost Utilization: Expected Vs Actual

57854 55858

0

40000

80000

Expected Actual


97%

Washim (84%), Yeotmal & Nanded (88%)

Payment of cost of Food grains to FCI up to 31.12.2012

16790

10703

3300

1019

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

Allocation Bill raised by FCI Payment to FCI Pending Bills


31%

As per FCI’s Statement upto 31As per FCI’s Statement upto 31stst December, 2012, total outstanding is 46% December, 2012, total outstanding is 46% (Rs. 48.49 crore)(Rs. 48.49 crore)

COOKING COST: ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION

63525

74612

8674292285

32519 34954

51718 55858

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

ALLOCATION UTILISATION


Rs

in L

akh

51% 60%47%61%

Central Share in allocation : 69196.1Lakh State Share in allocation : 23089 Lakh

Engagement of Cooks-cum-Helpers

230184 230184

0

70000

140000

210000

280000

Approval Engaged


100%

Primary + Upper Primary

Payment of Honorarium

23018

3681

17492

11254

6071

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Allocation OpeningBalance

Availability Payment toCCH

Unspent


35% 35%

Central Share in allocation : 17263.8 Lakh State Share in allocation : 5754.6 Lakh

65%65%

MME: ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION

1259

1573

18161899

0

867971 923

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13



Rs in

Lakh

s

55% 53% 49%

Transportation Assistance : ALLOCATION vs UTILISATION

24632311

2152 2229

1506

11501307 1421

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13



Rs in

Lakh

s

61% 61% 64%

50%

Achievement up to 2012-13 (Kitchen cum Stores)

30%

61%

9%

27%

41%32%

0%

30%

60%

90%

Constructed In Progress Yet to be started

Physical Financial

Ministry of HRD, Govt. of IndiaMinistry of HRD, Govt. of India

19599

6177

40007

Total Sanctioned : 65783 Kitchen Cum Stores

Achievement up to 2012-13 (Kitchen Devices)

78%

0%

22%

88%

0%12%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Procured In Progress Yet to be procuredPhysical Financial


Total Sanctioned : 121343 units of Kitchen Devices

Coverage : School Health Programme

85031

36668

0

30000

60000

90000

S H P

Institutions covered under MDM Acheivement


43%

Coverage : Inspections

85031

51509

0

30000

60000

90000

Inspections

Institutions covered under MDM Acheivement


61%

Coverage : School Health Programme No. of schools covered under

SHP

No. of children covered under

SHPHealth Check -ups Iron & Folic Acid Distributed

No. of schools No. of children covered


8075310428744

(83%)_ 460525304454(43%) 21986

6330872(51%)

Vitamin 'A' Distributed Deworming tablets distributed Distribution of spectacles




11424744447

(6%) 8833412684

(3%) 4685 2822


SCORE CARD- ALL COMPONENTS

7.6 8.1

9.7

6.1

3.1

6.1

4.9

9.1

7.86.49.9

7.2

8.3

6.1

2.4

10.0

10.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0Institution

ChildrenWorking Days

Foodgrain Utilz

Payment to FCI

Cooking Cost

MME

Kitchen shedKitchen DevicesTA

MIS Annual entry

MIS Monthly entry

School Health

Inspection

Gas Based Cooking

Drinking WaterToilet Facility


Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2013-14


Enrolment Vs Approval Vs Availing MDM during 2012-13 (Primary)

7872 67 68 67 67

69

0

30

60

90

2012-13

Enrolment 2012-13 Approval Q-1Q-2 Q-3 Average Chid. CoveredProposed for 2013-14


2013-14 (Proposed)

Q-3Q-2Q-1

Avg

Enrolment Vs Approval Vs Availing MDM during 2012-13 (Upper Primary)

46

40 38 40 39 3940

0

10

20

30

40

50

2012-13

Enrolment 2011-12 ApprovalQ-1 Q-2Q-3 Average Child. Covered


2012-13 (Proposed)

Q-3Q-2Q-1 Avg


Approved by Approved by PAB MDMPAB MDM

Already Already EngagedEngaged

Additional Additional requirement requirement

(2013-14)(2013-14)Cook-cum-

helper230184 230184 NilNil

Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM Proposal for Cook-cum-helper engaged in MDM SchemeScheme

Proposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-StoreProposal for Construction of Kitchen-cum-Store


No. of No. of institutionsinstitutions

SanctionedSanctioned Constructed Constructed through through

convergenceconvergence

GapGap

84883 65783 3719 15381

No Proposal for 2013-14 as earlier sanctioned kitchen-cum-stores are under process.

For Urban area (Municipal corporation and Municipalities) central kitchen system is adopted.

No Kitchen cum store is provided in Govt. Aided Schools.

Proposal for Procurement of Kitchen DevicesProposal for Procurement of Kitchen Devices


No. of No. of institutionsinstitutions

SanctionedSanctioned Procured Procured through through

convergenceconvergence

GapGap

121343 120905 438 0

State has submitted a proposal for replacement of kitchen devices in 85031 schools whereas 12797 units were sanctioned in 2007-08

Poor Performing Districts in Monthly Data Entry ( based on average data entry from April 2012 to Jan 2013


Latest Monthly Data entry Status in Web portal State level_Maharashtra


Proposals and Recommendations


S. No

component PAB Approval 2012-13

Proposal 2013-14 Recommendation

11 Children (Pry)Children (Pry) 72000007200000 6900000690000022 Children (U Pry)Children (U Pry) 40000004000000 4000000400000033 NCLPNCLP 71007100 4068406844 Working Day (Pry and U Pry)Working Day (Pry and U Pry) 225- Pry & U Pry225- Pry & U Pry

312– NCLP312– NCLP222- Pry & U Pry222- Pry & U Pry

312-NCLP312-NCLP55 Kitchen cum StoreKitchen cum Store NilNil66 Cook cum HelperCook cum Helper 230184230184 230184 No 230184 No

additional proposal additional proposal 77 Kitchen DevicesKitchen Devices 48731 for 48731 for

replacement(31838 replacement(31838 sanctioned in 2013)sanctioned in 2013)

85031 for 85031 for replacementreplacement

88 Drought affected areaDrought affected area NANA NANA NANA

99 MME PlanMME Plan1010 Notional Admissible Notional Admissible

Allocation as per existing Allocation as per existing rate(central share)rate(central share)

Rs. 104172.69 Rs. 104172.69 (lakh) (lakh)

1111 Notional Admissible Notional Admissible Allocation as per revised rate Allocation as per revised rate (central share)(central share)

Rs 109177.34 Rs 109177.34 (lakh)(lakh)

MI findings-Areas of ConcernMI findings-Areas of Concern


Cooking cost are not made available regularly - gap of 4 to 5 months.

cooks not paid timely. Interruption in 06 schools in Sholapur.11 schools in Gondia,17 schools

in Bhandara, 5 schools in Wardha , 10 schools in Nagpur,18 schools in Chandrapur due to non-availability of food grains for one to two months

Irregular supply of food grains reported in Raigarh in 1 school, 4 schools in Sindhudurg,in 1 school in Kolhapur,4 schools in Ratnagiri,2 schools in Sangli,1 school in Satara. and Pune.

Pucca kitchen sheds-cum-stores not sanctioned in Sangli, Satara,Pune ,Ratnagiri,Sindhugarh etc. in some of the visited schools.

No roster is being maintained by the community members for supervision of the MDM.

Monitoring by State and district officials was not a regular phenomenon.

ISSUESISSUES


No SSMC meeting in Last 3 Quarters.2012-13No SSMC meeting in Last 3 Quarters.2012-13

Delay in payment of honorarium to cooks (paid till November, 2012).Delay in payment of honorarium to cooks (paid till November, 2012).

Funds released to districts upto November 2012 only.Funds released to districts upto November 2012 only.

Low payment to FCI (outstanding 46%).Low payment to FCI (outstanding 46%).

61% only cooking cost utilized.61% only cooking cost utilized.

Less foodgrain utilization 61% against 81% coverage of children Less foodgrain utilization 61% against 81% coverage of children

Low MME(49%) utilized.Low MME(49%) utilized.

ATN on report of MI is awaited.ATN on report of MI is awaited.

It may be Painted at prominent Places on the outside wallIt may be Painted at prominent Places on the outside wall

of the school. of the school.


The MDM Logo should be Widely PublicizedThe MDM Logo should be Widely Publicized.

Thank You


mid day meal scheme

Documents

upper primary institutions

year ministry of hrd

chart data range

lower right corner of

performance of upper

iministry of hrd

coverage institutions

mis portal