mike evans
DESCRIPTION
Use of a historical analog-based winter storm guidance package for forecasting a central New York snow event. Mike Evans. Motivation. Models are often better at forecasting large scale patterns than quantitative precipitation. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Use of a historical analog-based winter storm guidance package for forecasting a central New York
snow event
Mike Evans
![Page 2: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation• Models are often better at forecasting large scale patterns than
quantitative precipitation.• Forecasters often make forecasts by examining model forecasts
of large-scale patterns, then evaluating qpf based on experience.• “Based on my experience, what type of precipitation pattern
does this type of storm produce?”. • “Does the model QPF look reasonable?”.• This type of methodology should best be employed by
forecasters with the most experience.
![Page 3: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Motivation
• …Forecast skill is largely determined by experience. The relative advantage of highly experienced forecasters is secured by virtue of the larger set of cases from which they many draw upon….
- Roebber and Bosart, 1996
![Page 4: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Motivation continued…
• ….There were major variations in the experience and perceived abilities of the Phoenix teams, generally producing the expected variations in performance. Teams composed of more senior and capable forecasters produced the greatest improvements (over guidance)…
- McCarthy, Purcell and Ball, 2007
![Page 5: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The problem….
• “I can’t remember what happened yesterday, let alone what happened with some storm from 5 years ago”
- An unidentified lead forecaster with many years of experience
![Page 6: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Saint Louis University Historical Analog-Based Winter Weather Guidance System
• Aids forecasters by providing easy access to a data set of winter storm events that are similar to upcoming, forecast events.
• “Instant Experience”
![Page 7: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Saint Louis University Historical Analog-Based Winter Weather Guidance System
• Ingests current GFS forecasts of large-scale forecast patterns
• Searches the NARR data base to find the best historical analogs to the current forecast
• Returns information on the analogs• Mean fields, and probabilistic information is
included• Detailed information on the top 15 analogs is
included
![Page 8: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Parameters that determination the top 15 analogs
• Parameters are determined within a user-selectable domain (2 east-coast domains, 2 mid-west domains).
• 300 and 500 and 850 hPa heights.• 850 hPa temperature and theta-e advection.• 850 and 700 hPa frontogenesis.• Surface temperature and sea-level pressure.• Precipitable water.• Storm track is included in the calculation.• For details, see:
http://intra.crh.noaa.gov/metdat/ssd/2008-12-16 13.01_SLU_Analog_Seminar.wmv.
![Page 9: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
http://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/ANALOG/analog.php
![Page 10: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Select a model run for comparison
![Page 11: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
15 analogs are returned – with information on the analogs available
![Page 12: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Example – December 31, 2008
![Page 13: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Sea-level pressure and 1000-500 mb thickness – December 31, 2008
![Page 14: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
700 hPa heights and frontogenesis
![Page 15: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Vertical motion, temperature and NAM QPF – December 31, 2008
![Page 16: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
How much snow have similar systems historically produced for our area?
![Page 17: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Mean 500 hPa heights and sea-level pressure from the 15 analogs
![Page 18: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Probabilistic snowfall information from the 15 analogs
![Page 19: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Best analog – February 26, 1994
![Page 20: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Best analog – observed snowfall
![Page 21: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
2nd best analog – January 13, 2000
![Page 22: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
2nd best analog – observed snowfall
![Page 23: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Observed snowfall – December 31, 2008
![Page 24: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Conclusion
• Probabilistic information from the analogs indicated a high probability for greater than 2 inches of snow across central NY, with lower probabilities of 4 and 6 inches.
• The best analogs indicated that a west-east band of 6 to 10 inches would be possible across central New York.
![Page 25: Mike Evans](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062520/568165d6550346895dd8e34b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
In this case, the guidance system…
• Provided “instant experience” to the forecaster for these types of systems.
• Allowed forecasters to assess the “reasonability” of the model QPF, and corresponding snowfall amounts.
• Other cases showed similar results.• Still waiting to assess the system for a major
nor’easter.