mike mccoleman, p.e. assistant maintenance administrator ohio department of transportation
DESCRIPTION
Defining Desired Outcomes. Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation. Defining Desired Outcomes. How Ohio is Using Condition Measures and Specific Goals to Focus and Manage their Workforce. Overview. Roadside inspection - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mike McColeman, P.E. Mike McColeman, P.E.
Assistant Maintenance AdministratorAssistant Maintenance Administrator
Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Department of Transportation
Defining Desired OutcomesDefining Desired Outcomes
How Ohio is Using Condition Measures and How Ohio is Using Condition Measures and Specific Goals to Focus and Manage their Specific Goals to Focus and Manage their Workforce.Workforce.
Defining Desired OutcomesDefining Desired Outcomes
OverviewOverview
Roadside inspectionRoadside inspection GIS Deficiency MappingGIS Deficiency Mapping Performance Index Performance Index District and County Work Plans District and County Work Plans
Ohio Transportation Ohio Transportation FactsFacts 3535thth in Geographic Size in Geographic Size 77thth Largest Population Largest Population 55thth Highest Traffic Volume Highest Traffic Volume 44thth Largest in Freight Hauled by Truck Largest in Freight Hauled by Truck 1010thth Largest Highway Network Largest Highway Network (over 19,300 (over 19,300
Centerline Miles) Centerline Miles)
44thth Largest Interstate Network Largest Interstate Network 22ndnd Largest Bridge Inventory Largest Bridge Inventory (approx. 42,000)(approx. 42,000)
Ohio DOTOhio DOT
12 Districts, Central Office12 Districts, Central Office88 County Garages 88 County Garages andand 135 135 OutpostsOutposts48,550 Lane Miles48,550 Lane Miles5890 Total Employees5890 Total Employees2941 Maintenance 2941 Maintenance EmployeesEmployeesMaintenance Employees Maintenance Employees Represent half Represent half ofof ODOT’s ODOT’s WorkforceWorkforce
Maintenance Quality Maintenance Quality Survey (MQS)Survey (MQS)
Recording of Maintenance deficiencies, as Recording of Maintenance deficiencies, as defined in the Maintenance Quality Survey defined in the Maintenance Quality Survey Manual, conducted through the Central Manual, conducted through the Central Office, Office of Maintenance Office, Office of Maintenance Administration.Administration.
MQS InspectionsMQS Inspections
Two teams consisting of two inspectorsTwo teams consisting of two inspectors Visual inspections conducted by vehicle Visual inspections conducted by vehicle Data recorded via touch screen laptop Data recorded via touch screen laptop
computer utilizing GPS technologycomputer utilizing GPS technology One Quarter of each County is inspected One Quarter of each County is inspected
ever three months.ever three months. 8 inspection categories8 inspection categories
Route TypeRoute Type
Priority RoutePriority Route All Interstate RoutesAll Interstate Routes All Divided National Highway All Divided National Highway
System (NHS) Routes, Functional System (NHS) Routes, Functional Class 12Class 12
General RouteGeneral Route All other State maintained U.S. and All other State maintained U.S. and
State RoutesState Routes
8 Inspection Categories8 Inspection Categories
GuardrailGuardrail Pavement DeficiencyPavement Deficiency Pavement Drop offPavement Drop off Vegetation ObstructionVegetation Obstruction LitterLitter Drainage ObstructionDrainage Obstruction SignSign Pavement MarkingPavement Marking
GuardrailGuardrail
Permanent concrete barrierPermanent concrete barrier GuardrailGuardrail
2 continuous missing or 2 continuous missing or rotten postsrotten posts
3 continuous missing or 3 continuous missing or rotatedrotated blockoutsblockouts
Anchor AssemblyAnchor Assembly Impact AttenuatorImpact Attenuator
Pavement DeficiencyPavement Deficiency
PotholesPotholes RuttingRutting Manholes, inlets, and blowups that Manholes, inlets, and blowups that
are 2 inches or more above or below are 2 inches or more above or below pavement surfacepavement surface
Crack sealing and flushingCrack sealing and flushing
Pavement Drop OffPavement Drop Off
Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 inches in depth and 15 linear feet in length for a inches in depth and 15 linear feet in length for a paved shoulder less than 8 feet in width.paved shoulder less than 8 feet in width.
Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 Drop off from the paved surface exceeding 2 inches in depth and 100 linear feet in length for a inches in depth and 100 linear feet in length for a paved shoulder equal to or greater than 8 feet in paved shoulder equal to or greater than 8 feet in width.width.
Vegetation Vegetation ObstructionObstruction
Growth obscuring signage, guardrail, orGrowth obscuring signage, guardrail, or
sight distancesight distance
LitterLitter
Any tenth mile segment where the Any tenth mile segment where the countable countable litter items exceed tenlitter items exceed ten
Large object 8 inches in height and 3 Large object 8 inches in height and 3 feet by 3 feet or greater in area.feet by 3 feet or greater in area.
Drainage Ditch Drainage Ditch ObstructionObstruction
Any ditch where 50 percent of the crossAny ditch where 50 percent of the cross
section is obstructedsection is obstructed
SignSign
Any sign or delineator which is faded,Any sign or delineator which is faded,
damaged, or unreadabledamaged, or unreadable
Pavement MarkingPavement Marking
Faded or missing striping in excess of Faded or missing striping in excess of 150 linear feet 150 linear feet
Faded or missing auxiliary markingsFaded or missing auxiliary markings
MQS Inspection MQS Inspection VehicleVehicle
MQS Touchscreen MQS Touchscreen DisplayDisplay
Northwest Quadrant Northwest Quadrant MapMap
MQS Field InspectionMQS Field Inspection
Organizational Organizational Performance Index (OPI)Performance Index (OPI)
The OPI tracks the overall performanceThe OPI tracks the overall performance
of the Department in nine key areas.of the Department in nine key areas.
Each District’s performance is comparedEach District’s performance is compared
to one another and to the overall Stateto one another and to the overall State
average.average.
District Maintenance District Maintenance OPIOPI Maintenance categories are based solely Maintenance categories are based solely
on the 8 MQS categories plus the on the 8 MQS categories plus the Customer Satisfaction Survey.Customer Satisfaction Survey.
Deficiencies per lane mile are associated Deficiencies per lane mile are associated to ranges which correspond to an OPI to ranges which correspond to an OPI score for each Route Type (Priority or score for each Route Type (Priority or General).General).
District Maintenance District Maintenance OPI ScoreOPI Score
The District Maintenance OPI Score is The District Maintenance OPI Score is
calculated by summing the Score times thecalculated by summing the Score times the
Weight for the 9 Maintenance categories.Weight for the 9 Maintenance categories.
District Maintenance District Maintenance Index ValueIndex Value
The District Maintenance Index ValueThe District Maintenance Index Value
is calculated by dividing the Districtis calculated by dividing the District
Maintenance OPI Score by 254.Maintenance OPI Score by 254.
Division of Highway OperationsRevised OPI Ranges as of July 4th, 2004
Maintenance Deficiency Ranges from MQS Survey
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
Priority Scale Per Lane Mile
General Scale Per Lane Mile
6 0.0500 0.0500 0.2000 0.1200 0.0500 0.0500 0.0100 0.0100 1.3500 0.3000 0.0100 0.0100 0.0300 0.0300 0.0600 0.0600
5 0.1300 0.1300 0.4200 0.2500 0.1300 0.1300 0.0300 0.0300 2.9500 0.6700 0.0200 0.0200 0.0600 0.0600 0.1500 0.1500
4 0.2100 0.2100 0.6500 0.3900 0.2100 0.2100 0.0500 0.0500 4.6500 1.0700 0.0300 0.0300 0.1000 0.1000 0.2400 0.2400
3 0.2800 0.2800 0.8600 0.5100 0.2800 0.2800 0.0700 0.0700 6.2000 1.4200 0.0400 0.0400 0.1300 0.1300 0.3200 0.3200
2 0.3500 0.3500 1.0700 0.6300 0.3500 0.3500 0.0900 0.0900 7.7500 1.7700 0.0500 0.0500 0.1600 0.1600 0.4000 0.4000
1 0.4200 0.4200 1.2800 0.7500 0.4200 0.4200 0.1000 0.1000 9.3000 2.1200 0.0600 0.0600 0.1800 0.1800 0.4800 0.4800
Score 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Weight 4 3 4 3 2 4 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 4 3
Value 16 12 16 12 8 16 8 4 8 4 12 8 12 8 16 12
Maintenance OPI Index: = 172
Maintenance OPI Index: = 67%172 / 258
is calculated by dividing the sum of the 16 Deficiency Category Values by the maximum possible value of 258.
Sum of Values
LitterDrainage Ditch
ObstructionSign
Pavement Marking
Vegetation Obstruction
Maintenance OPI Index
OPI Scores
GuardrailPavement Deficiency
Pavement Drop-Off
Maintenance OPI Index
ODOT OPI CategoriesODOT OPI Categories Construction ManagementConstruction Management Contract AdministrationContract Administration Equipment and FacilitiesEquipment and Facilities FinanceFinance Information TechnologyInformation Technology MaintenanceMaintenance Plan DeliveryPlan Delivery Quality and Human ResourcesQuality and Human Resources System ConditionsSystem Conditions
Statewide County Work Plan Summary Total System Priority Lane Mileage 10,943
April 1, 2004 - March 31, 2005 - Planning Period Total System General Lane Mileage 27,848
Report Date: 06/30/04
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 04 Expended
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 04 Expended
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 04 Expended
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 04 Expended
CWP 03 Planned
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 04/01/04 04/01/04 04/01/04 04/01/04
192,962 360,803 669,831 766,345 378,000 1,904,379
11,846 42,492 44,265 17,391 289,709 36,244
4,844 9,250 39,395 164,289 10,160 521,997 06/30/04 04/01/04
246,755 209,652 66,493 169,896 412,545 97,357 874,309 753,491 196,497 1,070,713 948,025 282,047 566,446 677,869 2,361,674 2,462,620 $178,451,488 $76,926,796
Goal Status Goal StatusCWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 04 Expended
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
03/31/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 06/30/04 03/31/05 06/30/04 03/31/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 06/30/04 03/31/05 06/30/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04
6 6 714 614 2,313 -1,699 5 5 2,447 2,365 5,842 -3,477 109,363 89,610 24,946 $21,362,594 $16,090,278 4 4 $1,340,809 $14,927,325 $16,268,134 2,979 0
6 6 1,774 1,562 7,162 -5,600 5 6 4,016 3,285 10,849 -7,564 357,030 300,331 111,109 $1,745,388 $1,053,287 4 4 $7,119,358 $0 $7,119,358 4,847 0
5 5 900 601 2,313 -1,712 5 6 1,801 1,196 5,842 -4,646 402,529 320,692 76,230 $1,990,562 $1,111,233 4 4 $4,538,170 $1,859,322 $6,397,492 1,797 0
6 6 97 53 550 -497 5 6 524 285 1,390 -1,105 180,988 169,828 42,128 $447,733 $597,400 4 4 $2,130,376 $1,220,339 $3,350,715 338 0
5 6 21,558 19,432 51,235 -31,803 4 4 25,238 21,990 29,766 -7,776 221,160 229,773 73,779 $248,700 $400,000 4 4 $3,345,653 $0 $3,345,653 41,422 0
5 6 71 45 330 -285 3 4 965 792 834 -42 423,657 351,964 138,221 $2,494,760 $1,557,088 4 4 $8,024,563 $0 $8,024,563 837 0
4 4 570 505 1,432 -927 5 5 1,488 1,230 2,781 -1,551 107,635 95,787 24,931 $0 $75,000 4 4 $2,059,540 $0 $2,059,540 1,735 0
4 3 586 607 2,644 -2,037 3 3 6,168 5,567 6,676 -1,109 23,048 23,051 6,015 $5,124,222 $10,680,174 4 4 $503,504 $10,871,146 $11,374,650 6,174 0
655,000 397,638 7,459 $0 $0 $708,567 $0 $708,567
26,270 23,419 67,979 -44,560 42,647 36,710 63,980 -27,270 2,480,409 1,978,674 504,818 33,413,959 $31,564,460 $29,770,540 $28,878,132 $58,648,672
03/31/04 03/31/05 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 03/31/05 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/05 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04
5% 3,460.0 173.0 353.0 0.0 8,692.0 434.6 546.4 157.2 607.6 899.4 450.4 2,785.5 61,213.0 1,145 47,140,341.9 148.0% $139,199 $9,407,761 $9,546,960 $157 25.9%
15% 4,285.0 642.8 789.7 97.7 7,181.0 1,077.2 1,627.8 39.8 1,719.9 2,417.4 1,582.5 20,608.9 71,433.0 5,576 2,419,460.0 140.6% $310,635 $1,538,131 $1,848,766 $137 8.0%
23,394.4 132,646 6,721 $49,559,802 $449,834 $10,945,892 $11,395,726
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 04 Expended
CWP 03 Posted
04/01/04 04/01/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 03/31/04 04/01/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04 06/30/04
0.2% 10.3% 5,599 2,060 273 $1,867,739 32.5% $13,047 $1,799,311 $1,812,358 248,951 52.6%
2.7% 13.2% 8,670 47,576 3,452 $3,692,598 130.1% $333,437 $2,306,589 $2,640,026 1,920 42.6%
7.2% 21.2% 37,625 63,828 9,275 $3,098,968 13.9% $854,798 $3,707,252 $4,562,050 12,777 26.7%
2.8% 29.1% 17,543 39,698 3,633 $6,676,008 $476,964 $5,089,317 $5,566,281 48%
73.5% 21.9% 214,148 357,950 94,286 $10,921,680 234.5% $5,332,792 $3,826,409 $9,159,201 233,694 46.1%
8.8% 0.4% 29,157 61,885 11,291 $88,000 91.6% $736,716 $74,160 $810,876 7,870 34.3%
1.0% NA 6,290 30,690 1,221 $0 37.3% $72,651 $0 $72,651 1,920 21.5%
3.7% 3.8% 19,259 61,480 4,766 $1,119,598 63.9% $280,001 $668,386 $948,387 1,364 46.8%
338,291 665,167 128,197 $27,464,591 $8,100,406 $17,471,424 $25,571,830
2,842,095 2,776,487 639,736 $110,438,352 $38,320,780 $57,295,448 $95,616,228
Revision Date: 7/30/2004 Date Printed: 9/29/2004
Grand Total $76,926,796
1,549 $494,791
Total $19,968,384
Bridge Cleaning 2 year Each 4,559 2,913
15,091 $74,160
Underdrain Outlet Cleaning 3 year cycle Each 7,023 $023,947
22,961
8,943
Surface Cleaning Annually Pass Miles 25,070
216,115
$4,919,857
Mowing and Vegetation # times per year Swath Miles 273,023 $3,005,433506,717
$5,621,848344,961 47,826
Highway Lighting 90% on Each
Signing (8 yr. initial),15 yr. Each 35,049
Electrical Traffic Contr. Devices Annually Each
$57,295,448
3,467 4,510 2,590 $3,343,641
04/01/04 06/30/04 04/01/04
RPM Replacement 3 year cycle Each 223,944 $2,508,654472,8951,455,923
TMS & CMS Costs for Total
System
Total System Units
Completed
Percent of Goal Met
CWP 04 Planned
Total CMS Contract Work ($$) Percent Total
System Planned
TMS Costs for Total System
CMS Costs for Total SystemPreventive Maintenance
CategoryMaintenance Cycle Unit of Measure Total System Units
Number of Units Planned Goal
Percent TMS Hours
Percent CMS
Dollars
Total System Units Remaining to meet Goal
Total TMS Work Effort (Hours)
Total $25,393,952
Pavement Prev. Maintenence $20,195,922
Crack Sealing $5,198,030
CWP 04 Expended
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
04/01/04
Planned Lane Miles
Lane Miles needed to Meet Goal
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
Percent Goal Miles
CompletedCandidate Lane Miles
Goal lane Miles
Planned Lane Miles
CMS Goal Miles
Completed
Candidate Lane Miles
Goal lane Miles
Planned Lane Miles
CMS Goal Miles
Completed
Goal Lane Miles
TMS Costs for Total System
CMS Costs for Total System
TMS & CMS Costs for Total
System
Total System Goal Lane
Miles Completed
Total
Pavement Engineering Category
Target Percent
Priority System General System Total System Total TMS Work Effort (Hours) Total CMS Contract Work ($$) Percent Total
System Planned
Drainage Ditch Obstruction
Sign Deterioration
Pavement Marking
Snow & Ice
Pavement Deficiency
Pavement Drop Off
Vegetation Obstruction
Litter
TMS & CMS Costs for Total
System
Total System Deficiencies
Total System Deficiency Reduction Needed to Meet Goal
Guardrail
Priority System
OPI Goal for CWP
2007
General System
OPI Goal for CWP
2007
TMS Costs for Total System
CMS Costs for Total System
General System Deficiencies
General System Deficiency
Total TMS Work Effort (Hours) Total CMS Contract Work ($$)
Total 3,258 5,464,202
Maintenance OPI Category
Priority System OPI Scores
Priority System Deficiencies
Priority System Deficiency
General System OPI Scores
Project Inspector 222 441,947
All Other Workers 983 749,935
2,361,674
CWP 03 Posted
CWP 04 Planned
CWP 04 Expended
06/30/04
196,497 1,070,713 282,047 566,446
Total Hours less Deductions
Maintenance Contracts
Highway Workers 2,053 4,272,320
246,755 66,493 169,896 97,357 874,309
Available Resources Category
Number of Employees Total Hours
Compensation Time Deduction Training Deduction All Other Leave Deduction Other Direct Labor DeductionProject Inspection
Deduction
County Work Plan (Statewide Summary)
Asset ManagementAsset Management
Julie Ray – Deputy Director of FinanceJulie Ray – Deputy Director of Finance
Ohio DOTOhio DOT
614-466-2687614-466-2687
[email protected]@dot.state.oh.us
Defining Desired Defining Desired OutcomesOutcomes
Questions ???Questions ???