military value analysis and brigade combat team reorganization briefing (2)

AMERICA’S ARMY:THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION

UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

Military Value Analysis &Brigade Combat Team

ReorganizationBriefing

MLAs

released 25 Jun 2013


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

What the Army announced

BCT reorganization The Army’s process

Options and decision

Impacts by installation

Agenda


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

IAW 2012 Defense Planning Guidance (DPG) directing Army reductions, the Army is reducing its Active Component endstrength by 80,000 Soldiers, from an FY2010 peak of 570,000 to 490,000 by the end of FY2017.

This reduction includes a reduction of at least 12 BCTs and the decision to move to a 3-BN design.

No force structure reductions in ARNG or USAR; RC BCT design will match AC.

Simultaneously, the Army will distribute and shape the remaining force to enhance readiness, increase balance and flexibility, and meet the requirements of the Nation’s Defense Strategy in a fiscally constrained environment.

The 80,000 Active Component reduction represents a 14% decrease from 570K in 2010 to 490K NLT 2017.

What The Army Announced

This announcement has nothing to do with BRAC or the potential impacts of Sequestration


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

BCT Reorganization 2 vs 3 BN

Extensive Modeling, Analysis, and CDR Interviews. Significant analysis included using 34 vignettes, over 6,500 hours of simulated combat (ranging from 7 to 72 hrs of operations), and extensive interviews with all the Army’s Division Commanders plus 23 combat veteran BCT Commanders.

Preserves combat power/Reduces HQs. This plan retains 33 AC BCTs with 95 combat battalions, eliminating 12 HQs. Only 3 fewer battalions than the 45 BCT force (98 battalions), and 13 more than the un-reorganized 37 BCTs (82 battalions). Hawaii, Alaska, and Italy will not receive a third maneuver battalion.

Increases Operational Capability. Reorganized BCTs with a third maneuver battalion, an engineer battalion, and enhanced fires capabilities are more lethal with less overhead. More capable BCTs to meet the New Defense Strategy. Analysis on future missions and scenarios indicate that 33 AC and 28 ARNG BCTs is sufficient to support COCOM demands. Minimizes cost (MILCON). The Army avoids almost all MILCON through internal BCT installation reorganizations. Reorganizing ARNG BCTs. The ARNG will begin reorganizing without growth by aligning 17 Tactical Combat Forces (infantry battalions) to 28 of their BCTs.


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

BCT Conversion Concept

X X X

I

HHC

X

I I

BSBI I

BEB

I I I I I I

BSTB

I I I I

BSBI I I II

HHCI I

X

Current BCTs on a multiple BCT Installation

X

Inactivated BCT

X X X

Converted BCT Design

1. RSTA converts to IN BN2. IN BN moves to new BCT3. IN BN moves to new BCT4. One FA battery moves to new BCTs5. One FSC moves to new BCTs 6. BSTB converts to BEB (adds one EN

Company)7. ~2752 spaces reinvested in converted

BCTs

O OO O O O

Converted BCT on a multiple BCT Installation

~3536 spaces

~4408 spaces


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

Quantitative Analysis Budget Control Act

Current Defense Strategy

Total Army Analysis

OSD Resource Management Decision

Force Design Updates/Concept Plans

Military Value Analysis (MVA)

- Operational Considerations

- Quality of Life

Programmatic Environmental Analysis (PEA) Environmental analysis Socio-economic analysis

Statutory Requirementsand Other Considerations

Statutory Requirementsand Other Considerations

Force Structure GuidanceForce Structure Guidance

Planning TeamDeveloped 9 Options

Qualitative AnalysisBased Options

Army Senior Leader Guidance

Strategic Considerations Cost (MILCON) Readiness Impact Investment/Regeneration Proximity Statutory Requirements Environmental & Socioeconomic

Impacts Community Input

Council of Colonels (2)

1-/2-Star GOSC

3-Star GOSC Formal StationingAnnouncement Congressional

Notification Public Release

The Army’s Process

PEA Public Input PEA Public Input Public Listening Sessions

Validate MVA Data

Army Senior Leader Guidance

OptionsPresented to SLDA

SA/CSA Decision

Review Boards recommended

3 options MVA/Environmental Personnel Impacts Training Impacts Unit Donors Strategic

Considerations MILCON Power Projection Proximity Economic Impacts


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

Germany

Ft Bliss Ft Hood

X

Ft Polk

X

Ft Lewis

Ft Carson Ft Knox

Ft Campbell

Ft Riley

Ft Stewart HAAF

XX

X X

Ft DrumKorea

Schofield BK/ Shafter/ Wheeler

X X X

Ft Benning

3 1 2

4 1

X

2 3

4

Hawaii X

4X

3

X

2

X

4

1

3

2

X X X X

2 3 4

1

XXX

1 2 3

XXX X2

X

1

3

4

21 3 4

xx2ID

xx25ID

1ADxx

xx4ID xx

1ID

xx 101 AASLT

xx10MD

xx82ABN

Ft Bragg

xx3ID

xxx

III

X X X X

2 431

xx1CD

xxx

V

Ixxx

xxx

XVIII

X

1

32

XXX

X

Alaska

Ft RichardsonFt Wainwright

X

1 4

X

X

173

Italy

X

172

X

170

3CR

X

xx7ID

Joint BaseLewis-McChord

4

15 ABCT, 20 IBCT, 8 SBCT

XXX

Infantry BCT (Airborne)

X

Armored BCTXX

Infantry BCTXXX

XStryker BCT

BCTs

X

2CR

Current AC BCT Stationing and Mix

XX

X

MNVR BNs45 BCTs= 98

http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/ImageProxy.ashx?n=1&t=original&id=5717



UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

Germany

Ft Bliss Ft Hood

X

Ft Polk

X

Ft Lewis

Ft Carson Ft Knox

Ft Campbell

Ft Riley

Ft Stewart HAAF

XX

X X

Ft Drum

Korea

Schofield BK/ Shafter/ Wheeler

X X X

Ft Benning

3 1 2

4 1

X

2 3

4Hawaii

X

4X

3

X

2

X

4

13 2

X X X X

2 3 41

XXX

1 2 3

XXX X2

X

1

3

4

21 3 4

xx2ID

xx25ID

1ADxx

xx4ID xx

1ID

xx 101 AASLT

xx10MD

xx82ABN

Ft Bragg

xx3ID

xxx

III

X X X X

2 431

xx1CD

xxx

V

Ixxx

xxx

XVIII

X

1

32

XXX

X

Alaska

Ft RichardsonFt Wainwright

X

1 4

X

X

173

Italy

X

172

X

170

3CR

X

xx7ID

Joint BaseLewis-McChord

4

12 ABCT, 14 IBCT, 7 SBCT

XXX

Infantry BCT (Airborne)

X

Armored BCTXX

Infantry BCTXXX

XStryker BCT

BCTs

X

2CR

Reorganization Plan24 June 2013

XX

X

MNVR BNs45 BCTs= 9837 BCTs= 8233 BCTs= 95

• MVA only looked at installations and not BCT type/mix• BCT mix being staffed




UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

INSTALLATION2001 AC End

Strength: 482.2KPercent of AC on

Installation2012 AC End

Strength: 570KPercent of AC on

Installation2017 AC End

Strength: 490KPercent of AC on

InstallationPercent change FY 12 to FY 17

Fort Bragg 39,931 8.28% 42,735 7.50% 40,186 8.20% 0.70%

Fort Drum 10,665 2.21% 16,643 2.92% 15,060 3.07% 0.15%

Fort Stewart 15,170 3.15% 21,157 3.71% 19,785 4.04% 0.33%

Fort Benning 10,607 2.20% 13,029 2.29% 13,105 2.67% 0.38%

Fort Knox 6,382 1.32% 7,667 1.35% 4,354 .89% -0.46%

Fort Campbell 22,911 4.75% 29,222 5.13% 28,902 5.90% 0.77%

Fort Polk 7,895 1.64% 9,327 1.64% 9,084 1.85% 0.21%

Fort Riley 9,412 1.95% 17,226 3.02% 15,497 3.16% 0.14%

Fort Hood 41,127 8.53% 40,899 7.18% 37,959 7.75% 0.57%

Fort Carson 13,816 2.87% 22,667 3.98% 24,484 5.00% 1.02%

Fort Bliss 8,765 1.82% 27,479 4.82% 26,729 5.45% 0.63%

Fort Lewis 16,293 3.38% 31,029 5.44% 26,488 5.41% -0.03%

Schofield Barracks 16,859 3.50% 15,730 2.76% 15,840 3.23% 0.47%

Fort Wainwright 4,414 .92% 6,254 1.10% 6,806 1.39% 0.29%

Fort Richardson 2,093 .43% 5,659 .99% 4,765 .97% -0.02%

BCT Installations


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

INSTALLATION2001 AC End

Strength: 482.2K

Percent of AC on Installation

2012 AC End Strength: 570K


2017 AC End Strength: 490K


Percent change FY 12 to FY 17

Aberdeen Proving Ground

1,145 .29% 2,478 .43% 2,604 .53% 0.10%

Fort Belvoir 1,835 .38% 4,115 .72% 3,926 .80% 0.09%

Fort Gordon 6,269 1.30% 5,616 .98% 5,866 1.20% 0.22%

Fort Huachuca 3,939 .82% 2,590 .45% 2,559 .52% 0.07%

Fort Irwin 4,610 .96% 4,357 .76% 4,106 .84% 0.08%

Fort Jackson 3,344 .69% 2,878 .50% 2,947 .60% 0.10%

Fort Leavenworth 1,786 .37% 2,460 .43% 2,539 .52% 0.09%

Fort Lee 2,514 .52% 3,797 .66% 3,420 .70% 0.04%

Fort Leonard Wood 4,284 .89% 5,978 1.04% 5,093 1.04% 0.00%

Fort Meade 3,570 .74% 4,621 .81% 4,970 1.01% 0.20%

Fort Rucker 2,875 .60% 2,948 .51% 3,249 .66% 0.15%

Fort Sam Houston 6,311 1.31% 5,395 .94% 5,084 1.04% 0.10%

Fort Shafter 1,134 .24% 2,270 .39% 2,325 .47% 0.08%

Fort Sill 9,710 2.01% 7,596 1.33% 7,050 1.44% 0.11%

JB Langley-Eustis 6,673 1.40% 4,268 .74% 3,935 .80% 0.06%

JB Myer-Henderson Hall

4,369 .91% 2,420 .42% 2,389 .49% 0.07%

Redstone Arsenal 1,339 .28% 481 .08% 582 .12% 0.04%

White Sands Missile Range

90 .02% 546 .09% 11 0.00% -0.09%

Non-BCT Installations


UNCLASS/FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO

EUROPE

2001

Army Endstrength

482.2K

Stationed in Europe in 2001

58,444

Percentage of total force

12.12%

2012Army Endstrength

570K


38,712


6.79%


490K


27,051


5.52%

Difference between 2001 and 2017: -31.4K


490K


27,965


5.71%

V Corps and 2 BCT Inactivated

military value analysis and brigade combat team reorganization briefing (2)

Documents