milwaukee pedestrian planning

82
PEDESTRIAN PLANNING BEST PRACTICE CASE STUDIES FOR MILWAUKEE’S PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS, PROGRAMS, AND POLICIES UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINMILWAUKEE APPLIED PLANNING WORKSHOP SPRING 2011 HEATH ANDERSON : RACHANA KOTHARI : PAUL MERKEY : XYLIA RUEDA : MARK SAUER

Upload: sarup

Post on 05-Aug-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

The primary objective of this study is to identify best management practices in pedestrian planning for the City of Milwaukee. The Planning Group has compiled different pedestrian related best practice methods Best practices have been categorized in three groups — project based, programs, and policies—which address various pedestrian issues. This report also provides a set of recommended policies and programs to encourage, educate, and promote increased use of a more accessible and walkable environment.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNINGBEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES  FOR  MILWAUKEE’SPEDESTRIAN  PROJECTS,  PROGRAMS,  AND  POLICIES

UNIVERSITY  OFWISCONSIN-­MILWAUKEE

APPLIED  PLANNING  WORKSHOPSPRING  2011

HEATH  ANDERSON  :  RACHANA  KOTHARI  :PAUL  MERKEY  :  XYLIA  RUEDA  :  MARK  SAUER

Page 2: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 3: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

INTRODUCTION3

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTIONPROBLEM,  PROJECT-­PROGRAM-­POLICY  FRAMEWORK,  PROCESS,  GOALS  AND  OBJECTIVES

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIESPROJECT,  PROGRAM,  POLICY

TARGET  AREA  A91st  ST.  &  SILVER  SPRING  DR.,  SITE  SELECTION,  WALK  SCORE,  STAKEHOLDERS,  PUBLIC  INTERVIEWS-­  FIELD  SURVEY,  RECOMMENDATIONS

TARGET  AREA  B:6th  ST.  &  LINCOLN  AVE.,  SITE  SELECTION,  WALK  SCORE,  PUBLIC  INTERVIEWS-­  FIELD  SURVEY,  PUBLIC  PARTICIPATION  OPEN  HOUSE,  RECOMMENDATIONS

7

CITY  WIDE  RECOMMENDATIONSAPPLICATION  OF  PROJECT,  PROGRAM,  POLICYIN  MILWAUKEE

13PEDESTRIANS  IN  MILWAUKEEUS  PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING  AND  MILWAUKEE,  WALK  SCORE,  SEWRPC,  MILWAUKEE’S  EXISTING  BICYCLEACCOMMODATIONS

19

43

57

47

73

MILWAUKEE  SITE  SELECTIONGEOGRAPHIC  INFORMATION  SYSTEMS  ANALYSIS

Page 4: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 5: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

INTRODUCTION5

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARYThe  primary  objective  of  this  study  is  to  identify  best  management  prac-­tices   in   pedestrian   planning   for   the   City   of   Milwaukee.   The   Planning  Group  has  compiled  different  pedestrian  related  best  practice  methods  

-­destrian  needs.    Best  practices  have  been  categorized  in  three  groups—project   based,   programs,   and   policies—which   address   various   pedes-­trian  issues.    This  report  also  provides  a  set  of  recommended  policies  and  programs  to  encourage,  educate,  and  promote  increased  use  of  a  more  accessible  and  walkable  environment.

Many  large  cities-­  Seattle,  Portland,  San  Francisco,  Kansas  City,  Denver  have  successfully  drafted  and  adopted  pedestrian  plans.    Many  of  these  plans  are  also  inclusive  of  bicycle  plans  and  accommodations.    Milwau-­kee     currently   has   a  Bicycle   Plan  but   not   a   plan   that   focuses  on   the  improvement  of  pedestrian   interests,   safety,  and   infrastructure.    One  result  of  not  having  a  pedestrian  plan  is  a  large  number  pedestrian  crash  reports  generated  by  the  Milwaukee  Police  Department.    In  a  three  year  period   from   January   2007   to   January   2011,   828   pedestrian   crashes  were  reported.    Because  of  the  need  to  increase  pedestrian  safety,  this  report  begins  the  research  and  development  of  a  pedestrian  plan  for  the  City  of  Milwaukee.

case  studies  in  improvements  to  pedestrian  related  projects,  programs,  -­

of  highest  crash  frequency.    Further  analysis  was  conducted  on  various  

In  order   to  better  serve   the  public,  questionnaires  and  a  public  open  

needs,   likes,  and  dislikes.    One  of   those  needs  was  to  address  speed  and  driver  courtesy   throughout  Milwaukee.    Photomontages  and  spe-­

project  recommendations  intended  to  aid  in  the  reduction  of  pedestrian  

as  the  framework  for  problematic  intersections  throughout  the  City.

The  end  product  is  a  compilation  of  best  practice  project,  program,  and  

outlines  tasks  needed  to  reduce  pedestrian  crashes  throughout  the  City.    The  next  critical  steps  for  the  City  is  to  devise  a  ranking  system  to  stra-­tegically  prioritize  and  ensure  the  most  critical  projects  are  addressed  

-­ity.    These  recommendations  were  constructed  through  public  input  and    are  in  the  best  interest  of  the  residents  of  Milwaukee.

GROUP  MEMBERS

XYLIA  RUEDAProject  Manager

HEATH  ANDERSON:GIS  Spatial  Analysis

MARK  SAUER:Public  ParticipationCoordinator

RACHANA  KOTHARI:Urban  Design  Specialist

PAUL  MERKEY:Program  Researcher

Page 6: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 7: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

INTRODUCTION7

INTRODUCTION

planning  related  problem  dealing  with  improvements  to  the  proj-­ects,   programs,  and  policies   impacting   the  pedestrian   realm   in  

solving   the  problem,   the  group  acted  as  a   consulting   team   for  Dave   Schlabowske,   Bicycle   and   Pedestrian   Coordinator   for   the  City  of  Milwaukee,  Department  of  Public  Works.

The  overall  project  goal  for  is  to  present  the  client  with  a  docu-­ment  on  best  practice  case  studies   in  pedestrian  projects,  pro-­grams,   and   policies   from   around   the   nation.   Not   only  will   this  document  highlight  best  practices,  but  it  will  showcase  how  those  best   practices   can  be   implemented  at   various   sites   throughout  the  City  of  Milwaukee.

PROBLEM

existing  infrastructure  provides  ample  opportunity  for  pedestrian  circulation  and  allows  for  safe  separation  of  motorized  and  non  motorized  transportation  in  the  public  realm.  However,  sidewalks    alone   are   not   enough.   In   order   to   cater   to   the   increased  den-­

city,  Milwaukee  must  improve  policies  and  programs  to  guide  the  physical  design  of  streets  for  the  pedestrian.

Currently,  the  State  of  Wisconsin  uses  “Guide  to  Complete  Streets”  when  redeveloping  state  roads  and  highways.  This  plan  is  enact-­

regardless  of  the  location  of  the  infrastructure  in  the  State.    The  “complete”  street  guide  however,  does  not  apply  to  city  streets  not  owned  by  the  state.    Though  the  City  of  Milwaukee  has  the  ability  to  create  the  infrastructure  and  density  it  desires  through  its  own  means,  there   is  currently  no  best  practices  program  or  complete  streets  policy  in  place  to  guide  this  development  at  the  local  level.

This   study   is   intended   to   create   a   living,   breathing   document  which  applies  best  practice  principles  in  pedestrian-­oriented  de-­

-­tion,   it  will  act  as  a  gateway  and  template  for   further  develop-­ment   of   best   practices   in  City   projects.   The   outcome  will   be   a  combination  of  project,  policy,  and  program  recommendations  for  the  City  of  Milwaukee.

Page 8: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 8

PROJECT,  PROGRAM,  POLICY  FRAMEWORKPedestrian  planning  is  inclusive  of  three  elements-­  project,  pro-­gram,  and  policy.    Implemented  through  private  or  public  entities,  

rewarding  walking  experience.

Projectchange  to  the  pedestrian  infrastructure  or  experience.    Projects  would  include  things  like  installing  speed  humps,  or  new  cross-­walk  line  painting.    Projects  should  be  done  at  the  municipal  level.

Program -­cating  the  public  or  encouraging  walking  as  a  viable  transporta-­tion  option.    Programs  can  be  implemented  at  the  municipal  level  or  privately.

Policy -­ment  by  a  department  or  agency  to  educate  the  public  or  encour-­age  walking   as   a   viable   transportation   option.     Policies   can   be  implemented  by  private  entities  or  through  a  municipality.

PROCESS

to  frame  the  research  and  problem-­solution.  Finally,  a  scope  of  work  was  created  and  roles  were  selected  by  each  group  member.

Two  Milwaukee  sites  were  selected  using  Geographic  Information  Systems  analysis.  In  addition,  best  practice  case  study  research  

infrastructure,  programs,  and  policies  in  cities  around  the  nation.  Through   conceptual   design   renderings   and   recommendations,  best  practice   research  will   be   implemented  on   two   sites  within  

and  policies.

public   participation   charette   and   stakeholder   interviews   were  conducted  within  the  two  selected  sites.  Stakeholder  interviews  proved  to  be  useful  in  understanding  how  power  and  responsibil-­ity  is  shared  amongst  the  users  of  the  intersection  (drivers,  pe-­destrians,  local  business  owners).  The  public  charette  allowed  for  preference  surveys  to  be  conducted  and  residents  to  have  a  direct  impact  on  the  future  of  their  community.

Above:  Participants  of  the  public  charette  place  stickers  on  safe  and  unsafe  areas  of  one  of  the  target  intersections.

Page 9: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

INTRODUCTION9

The   result   of   this   process   is   both   conceptual   design   ideas   and  recommendations  on  projects,  programs,  and  policies  the  City  of  Milwaukee  can  implement  to  improve  the  pedestrian  realm.

GOALS,  OBJECTIVES,  AND  CRITERIA

by  the  Planning  Group.  They  are  intended  to  be  the  result  of  the  research  and   identify  recommendations  presented   in  this  docu-­

in  City  wide  policy.

IMPROVE  SAFETY:  By  eliminating  the  perceived  and  real  safety  issues  in  the  pedestrian  realm,  people  are  more  likely  to  choose  to  walk.    Objective:        1.  Reduce  pedestrian  crashes   Criteria:      -­  Improve  block  and  intersection  design  for  pedestrian              usage  based  on  best  practices      -­  Improve  Pedestrian  Level  of  Service  (see  WISDOT)        2.  Ensure  pedestrian  right-­of-­way   Criteria:      -­  Restrict  street  furnishings  to  the  edges  of  the  sidewalk      -­  Increase  sidewalk  width        3.  Education  and  Outreach   Criteria:      -­  Safe  pedestrian  habits  will  be  presented  in  at  least          three  different  media  formats      -­  Safe  pedestrian  habits  will  be  directed  at  all  ages      -­  Programs  will  educate  the  public  on  pedestrian  safety          regulations      -­  Safe  driving  habits

ENCOURAGE   WALKABILITY:   Milwaukee   should   encourage  walking  to  promote  healthy  and  active  lifestyles  which  result   in  

   Objective:        1.  Increase  the  frequency  of  walking   Criteria:      -­  Create  programs  that  encourage  walking  over  motor-­          ized  transportation      -­  Enhance  street  design  as  to  be  part  of  the  public  realm          to  make  pedestrians  feel  welcome  and  safe        2.  Education  and  Outreach:   Criteria:

         staff  about  the  pedestrian  realm

Page 10: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 10

     -­  Organize  programs  and  events  to  encourage  public  to          walk        3.  Improve  access  to  sidewalks  and  crossings:   Criteria:      -­  Reduce  intersection  crossing  distances  for  pedestrians      -­  Improve  accessibility  to  crossings  and  sidewalks  for          those  with  disabilities        4.  Improve  connectivity:   Criteria:      -­  Enhance  accessibility  to  other  modes  of  travel  such  as          mass  transit      -­  Promote  pedestrian  design  to  be  compatible  with  sur-­          rounding  uses

         dards  in  all  projects  to  improve  accessibility  for  all  users

THINK   LOCAL:   The   City   of   Milwaukee   has   the   resources   and  ability  to  manage  its  pedestrian  infrastructure  with  local  funding  sources  and  incentives.    Objectives:        1.  Complete  and  maintain  pedestrian  system   Criteria:      -­  Create  funding  strategies  for  pedestrian  infrastructure          improvements      -­  Create  funding  strategies  for  pedestrian  infrastructure          maintenance        2.  Public/Private  investment  (partnerships)   Criteria:      -­  Identify  private  funding  sources  for  pedestrian  infra-­          structure      -­  Identify  avenues  for  ventures      -­  Identify  and  pursue  available  grants  through  intergov-­          ernmental  co-­operation

Page 11: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 12: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 13: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIANS  IN  MILWAUKEE13

U.S.  PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING  AND  MILWAUKEECities   like   Seattle,   Portland,   and   San   Francisco   all   consistently  rank  among  the  most  desirable  cities  to  live  and  visit.    Their  ur-­banism-­  multi-­modal  approach  to  transportation,  economic  vital-­ity,  and  livability-­  is  notorious  Nationwide  and  often  emulated  in  

-­sirability  is  the  fact  that  these  cities  are  extremely  walkable.  Since  

transportation    that  progressive  cities  like  Seattle,  Portland,  and  San  Francisco  have  incorporated  into  planning  policies  and  pro-­

-­line  interactive  map  highlighting  walking  routes,  amenities,  and  multi-­modal  connections.  One  of  the  main  reasons  these  urban  areas  are  so  successful   is  because   they  have   taken  a  wholistic  approach  to  transportation  planning  and  created  pedestrian  plans  for  the  21st  Century.

The  City  of  Milwaukee  currently  ranks  as  the  28th  largest  city  by  Population.     Similar   cities   like  Denver,   Portland,   and   Louisville,  Kentucky  have  all  adopted  or  are  in  the  process  of  adopting  pe-­destrian  plans.    Cities   like  Baltimore  and  Nashville  have  county  or  regional  pedestrian  plans  which  are  used  at  the  local  level  by  each  respective  city  to  coordinate  pedestrian  planning.    On  the  other  hand,  Milwaukee  has  just  drafted  its  Bicycle  Plan  and  does  not  have  a  strategic,  City  wide  plan  for  its  pedestrians.  Walking  is  still  very  much  a  necessity  in  Milwaukee  because  of  the  safety  and  desirability  factors  which  stem  from  its  foundation.    While  the  City  of  Milwaukee  has  in  place  the  sidewalks  it  needs  to  encour-­age  walking,  the  City  lacks  a  wholistic  approach  to  pedestrian  and  transportation  plans.  Using  studies  like  Seattle  and  Denver  allows  Milwaukee   to   see  what  an  excellent  pedestrian  plan   looks   like.    More  importantly,  it  will  allow  Milwaukee  to  emulate  an  excellent  pedestrian  planning  process. Data  Source.  US  Census,  2010

Above:  a  comparison  of  similar  sized  cities  in  terms  of  areas  and  population.Source:  City  of  Milwaukee  Downtown  Plan

PEDESTRIANS  IN  MILWAUKEEThe   following   chapter   is   background   information   on   pedestrian  planning  as  it  relates  to  Milwaukee.

Page 14: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 14

WALK  SCOREWalk  Score  is  an  independent  interactive  mapping  site  launched  in  2007.    Inspired  by  the  work  of  the  Sightline  Institute,  its  mis-­sion  is  promote  walkable  neighborhoods  by  making  it  easy  for  the  average  Joe  to  evaluate  walkability-­  or  access  to  amenities  and  transportation-­  when  deciding  where  to  live.

The  Planning  Group  decided  to  utilize  this  free  service  to  evalu-­ate  the  two  target  areas  because  the  Planning  Group  agrees  with  

or  neighborhood  walkable.    Walkable  neighborhoods  offer  ben-­

sprawling,  auto-­dependent  neighborhoods  do  not.    Walking  pro-­duces  zero  emissions  and  provides  an  alternative   to  costly  gas  

minutes  a  person  spends  in  a  daily  car  commute,  time  spent  in  community   activities   falls   by   10%   (Sightline   Institute).     Final-­ly,  according  to  a  Seattle  Times  report  entitled  2  studies:  Urban  sprawl  adds  pounds,  pollution,  “the  average  resident  of  a  walk-­able  neighborhood  weighs  seven  pounds  less  than  someone  who  lives  in  a  sprawling  neighborhood”

In  each  target  area  section,  there  is  an  evaluation  of  the  select-­ed  intersection  and  surrounding  neighborhood  using  Walk  Score.  Walk  scores  are  numbered  between  0  and  100  with  100  being  a  

amongst  the  largest  40  U.S.  cities.    San  Francisco  is  number  1.

Above:  Milwaukee’s  most  walk-­able  neighborhoods  are  ranked  by  Walk  Score

Bottom  Left:  A  one  mile  radius  in  a  compact  neighborhood  versus  a  sprawling  neighborhood

Page 15: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIANS  IN  MILWAUKEE15

SOUTHEASTERN  WISCONSIN  REGIONALPLANNING  COMMISSION  (SEWRPC)

Plan  for  Southeastern  Wisconsin:  2035,”  states  that  their  pedes-­trian  facilities  plan  element  is  a  policy,  rather  than  a  system,  plan.  It  proposes   that   the  various  units  and  agencies  of  government  responsible   for  the  construction  and  maintenance  of  pedestrian  facilities  in  Southeastern  Wisconsin  adopt  and  follow  recommend-­ed  standards  and  guidelines  with  regard  to  the  development  of  those  facilities.  The  guidelines,  together  with  the  recommended  standards  for  pedestrian  facilities,  are  designed  to  facilitate  safe  

-­trian  safety:

They  also  propose  that  local  units  of  government  prepare  com-­munity  bicycle  and  pedestrian  plans  to  supplement  their  regional  plan.  The  local  plans  should  provide  for  facilities  to  accommodate  bicycle  and  pedestrian  travel  within  neighborhoods,  providing  for  convenient   travel   between   residential   areas   and   shopping   cen-­ters,  schools,  parks,  and  transit  stops  within  or  adjacent  to  the  neighborhood.    Lastly,  SEWRPC  recommends  that   local  units  of  government  consider  the  preparation  and  implementation  of  land  use  plans  that  encourage  more  compact  and  dense  development  patterns,  in  order  to  facilitate  pedestrian  and  bicycle  travel.

“The  standards  and  guidelines  for  pedestrian  facilities  in-­clude  recommendations  that  sidewalks  be  provided  along  streets  and  highways  in  areas  of  existing  or  planned  urban  

be  designed  and  constructed  using  widths  and  clearances  

other  buffer  areas  be  provided  between  sidewalks  and  the  

efforts   be  made   to  maximize   pedestrian   safety   at   street  crossings,  including  the  timing  of  the  “walk”  phase  of  traf-­

the  provision  of  pedestrian  “islands”  and  medians  in  wide,  heavily   traveled,   or   otherwise   hazardous   roadways.   The  plan  also  emphasizes  that  all  pedestrian  facilities  must  be  designed  and  constructed  in  accordance  with  the  require-­

implementing  regulations.”

Page 16: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 16

MILWAUKEE’S  EXISTING  BICYCLEACCOMMODATIONSTransportation   comes   in  many   forms.     These   forms  sometimes  work   together  and  sometimes  compete   for  users.    Whether  an  individual  decides  to  bike,  walk,  drive  or  otherwise,  it  is  important  to  think  about  pedestrian  planning  as  part  of  a  larger  transporta-­tion  network  which  supports  the  need  and  desire  to  have  multiple  modes  of  transportation.    One  area  where  Milwaukee  has  excelled  thus  far  is  in  bicycle  planning  and  accommodation.    Incorporating  the   existing   bicycle   infrastructure   into   pedestrian   planning   will  

planning  would  otherwise  miss.

The  following   is  an  excerpt   from  SEWRPC  Memorandum  Report  No.  197   -­gional  Transportation  System  Plan:

highways  which  provided  bicycle  accommodations  through  paved  shoulders,  bicycle  lanes,  or  separate  paths  in  2009.  The  mileage  of  arterial  streets  and  highways  that  provided  bicycle  accommodations  through  paved  shoulders,  bicycle  

Data  is  not  available  to  identify  those  urban  arterials  with  outside  lanes  of  14  feet  in  width  which  also  accommodate  bicycles.

-­lic  transit,  bicycle  and  pedestrian,  and  arterial  street  and  highway  elements  which  adds  to  the  quality  of  life  of  Region  residents  and  supports  and  promotes  expansion  of  the  Re-­

safe  travel  by  each  mode,  while  protecting  the  quality  of  

both  the  natural  and  man-­made  environment,  and  serving  to  support   implementation  of   the  regional   land  use  plan,  while  minimizing  the  capital  and  annual  operating  costs  of  the  transportation  system.

Page 17: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIANS  IN  MILWAUKEE17

Page 18: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 19: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROJECTS19

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIESThe  best  practice  section  of  this  report  outlines  several  project,  program,  and  policy  best  practices  from  around  the  nation  that  deal  with  how  to  improve  the  pedestrian  experience.  They  range  from   simple   project   practices   like   lighting   and   stripping   cross-­walks   to  programs  designed  to  reinstitute   the  practice  of  walk-­ing  to  neighborhood  schools.  Ultimately,  these  physical  and  insti-­tutional   changes  are   recommendations  based  on   their   success.  They  can  only  be   fully  successful   in  Milwaukee  through  a  com-­bined  social  change  in  the  behavior  of  pedestrian,  bicyclists,  and  motorists  alike.

PROJECT  BEST  PRACTICESThe  project   section   includes  a   collection  of   case   studies   cover-­ing  a  broad  array  of  topics  from  safety,  walkability,  accessibility,  infrastructure   improvements,   planning,   education   and   enforce-­ment.  These  case  studies  will  serve  as  a  baseline  for  project  im-­plementation  by  providing  ideas  for  potential  methods  Milwaukee  can  undertake  to  improve  pedestrian  infrastructure  and  support  a  walkable  environment.  Each  case  study  provides  a  context   in  which  the  project  takes  place,  a  description  of  the  pedestrian  is-­sues   faced,   as   well   as   how   the   community   sought   to   address  their  concerns  through  various  measures.    Each  case  study  then  concludes  with  a  solution  describing   the  successes  and   lessons  learned  from  the  planning  process  or  implementation.

CASE  STUDY  1:  UNCONTROLLED  CROSSWALKSLocationCity  of  Santa  Rosa,  California

ProblemThe  City  of  Santa  Rosa  reported  an  unusually  high  incidence  of  pedestrian/vehicle  collisions  due  to  uncontrolled  crosswalks.

BackgroundSpeeding  on  residential  streets   is  cited  as  one  of  the  most  fre-­quently  expressed  concerns  by  local  citizens.  To  provide  a  solu-­

and   facilities   improvements.   The   solution  was   tested,   analyzed  

Safety  (OTS).

SolutionSanta  Rosa  initiated  a  new  proactive  pedestrian  warning  system  

Case  Studies  are  from  the  Pe-­destrian  and  Bicycle  Information  Center  Case  Study  Compendium,  July  2010

PROJECTS1.  UNCONTROLLED          CROSSWALKS2.  SPEEDING  AND  LACK  OF            VISIBILITY3.  IRREGULAR  ANGLES4.  LACK  OF  CURBS5.  ECONOMIC          DISINVESTMENT6.  ROUNDABOUT7.  MANAGING          STORMWATER8.  CREATING  SIDEWALKS9.  UNLIMITED  AND          UNDEFINED  ACCESS10.  TOTAL  FACILITIES          OVERHAUL

Page 20: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 20

-­walk  at  uncontrolled  intersections.  This  was  tested  in  the  city  with  

light  units  which  are  embedded   in   the  pavement  adjacent   to  a  

Result  and  Application  for  Milwaukee

at  uncontrolled  crosswalks  clearly  has  a  positive  effect  in  enhanc-­-­

its  to  be  more  favorable  for  pedestrians.    It  is  even  more  effec-­tive  during  adverse  weather  conditions  such  as  darkness,  fog  and  rain.  With  continuous  monitoring  it  has  been  found  that  after  the  implementation  of   the  device   the  number  of  pedestrian/vehicle  fatalities  had  been  reduced  in  the  City  of  Santa  Rosa.  Moreover,  other  cities  like  Lafayette  and  West  Hollywood  have  also  installed  the  crosswalk  warning  systems  based  on  the  success   in  City  of  Santa  Rosa.

CASE  STUDY  2:  SPEEDING  AND  LACK  OF  VISIBILITYLocationBellevue,  Washington

ProblemPedestrian  crash  data  suggested  increased  fatalities  on  the  resi-­dential  streets  of  the  City  of  Bellevue.  With  the  expressed  con-­cerns  of  the  local  citizens,  the  City  needed  to  take  some  action.  Two  main  issues  which  concerned  the  citizens  were  speeding  on  residential  streets  and  reduced  visibility  due  to  close  parking  near  school  crosswalks.

Below:  In-­Pavement  Crosswalk  lighting  during  the  day  and  at  night.

Page 21: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROJECTS21

BackgroundThe  numerous  concerns  of  local  citizens-­  including  increased  fa-­talities  on   the   residential   streets  near   schools-­  put   this  project  into  motion.  Five  different  school  locations  were  selected  for  fa-­cilities   improvements  on  the  basis  of  high  numbers  of  students  living  within  walking  distance.  Initially,  this  program  was  created  

-­plemented.

SolutionDesign  and  infrastructure  improvements  included  installing  raised  crosswalks  which  doubled  to  reduce  vehicle  speeds  while  at  the  same  time  improving  pedestrian  visibility  by  preventing  vehicles  from  parking   too  close   to   the  crosswalk.  Curb  extensions  were  also  added,  where  feasible,  to  decrease  the  distance  necessary  to  cross  the  road  and  improve  line  of  sight.  Bollards  were  installed  in  the  curb  extensions  to  prevent  children  from  huddling  near  the  curb.  In  several   locations  additional  measures  were  also  taken,  

street  lighting,  and  additional  sidewalks  to  bridge  gaps.  The  im-­provements  also  included  an  educational  component.

Result  and  Application  for  Milwaukee-­

able,  it  has  been  noticed  that  through  facilities  improvements  the  average  vehicle  speed   is   reduced  by  3  mile  per  hour.  The  curb  extensions  have  effectively  prevented  parking  next  to  the  cross-­walk,  physically  keeping  parked  cars  at  least  30  feet  away.  Com-­ments   from  parents   and   residents   are   extremely   positive   after  the  improvements  and  the  city  plans  to  implement  these  in  future  projects.

CASE  STUDY  3:  IRREGULAR  ANGLESLocationMulry  Square,  New  York  City,  New  York

ProblemThe  Mulry  Square  intersection  in  Greenwich  Village  was  perceived  to  be  an  odd  and  dangerous   intersection  due  to  a  continuously  increasing  number  of  fatalities.  Speeding,  obstructed  views  of  on-­

-­walks  were  some  of  the  reported  issues  that  the  community  re-­quested  the  City  take  actions  on.

BackgroundMulry  Square,  a  wedge-­shaped  site,   is  currently  owned  by  NYC  

...through  facilitiesimprovements  the  average  vehicle  speed  is  reduced  by  3  mile  per  hour...

Above:  A  typical  curb  exten-­sion.    Curb  extensions  are  used  to  reduce  the  distance  pedestrian  have  to  cross.    As  a  secondary  

room  for  additional  sidewalk  ele-­ments  like  lighting,  rubbish  bins,  and  signage.

Page 22: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 22

City  Department  of  Transportation  has  worked  with  the  local  com-­munity  to  assess  the  issues  and  provide  solutions.

SolutionThe   community-­based  planning  process   resulted   in   recommen-­

-­ties  in  the  surrounding  area.  These  included  sidewalk  extensions,  

These   improvements   transformed   this   intersection,   which   was  previously  known  for  pedestrian  accidents  and  high-­speed  turns.  

street  and  outlined  with  temporary  bollards  to  test  the  impact  of  

pavers,  granite  curbs,  new  crosswalks,  landscaping,  bollards,  and    

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeWith  the  infrastructure  improvements  at  Mulry  square  the  num-­

the  project  is  evident  in  the  positive  community  feedback.

Background

improve  facilities  in  its  southeastern  quarter,  a  largely  low  income  community   of   Seattle   between   the   years   2001-­2004.  With   the  plan  to  implement  safer  and  more  walkable  neighborhoods  in  this  quarter,  this  project  was  initiated.

Above:  Mulry  Square  before  andafter  pedestrian  improvementswere  made.

CASE  STUDY  4:  LACK  OF  CURBSLocationSeattle,  Washington

Problem

streets  were  perceived  to  be  unsafe  and  less   pedestrian   friendly   without   curbs.  Due  to  a  lack  of  curbs,  cars  were  parked  on   the   sidewalks   and   planting   strips  

streetscaping   maintenance   impracti-­cal.  Furthermore,  because  cars  were  not  parked   on   the   street,   the   width   of   the  street  encouraged  an  unsafe  driving  at-­mosphere  discouraging  pedestrians.

Above:  Mulry  Square  now  offersa  safer  pedestrian  experience

like  sidewalk  extensions  and  in-­creased  green  space.

Page 23: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROJECTS23

“The  three  speed  humpsinstalled  and  new  parallel  

by  an  average  of  12  miles  per  hour”

SolutionThe  Seattle  Department  of  Transportation  was  committed  to  tak-­ing  numerous  actions  for  this  project  including  adding  curbs,  pro-­

calming,  and  sidewalk   repairs   to  support  safer  and  more  walk-­able  neighborhoods.  However,  the  project  faced  several  obstacles  due  to  concerns  raised  by  local  residents.    With  concerns  ranging  

limited  funds,  the  initial  project  was  termed  as  a  demonstration  project  chosen  to  serve  as  a  model  for  future  improvements.

One  street  segment  with  disintegrating  sidewalks  and  high  rates  -­

were  carried  out  to  further  the  work  of  revital-­izing  the  neighborhood.    Results  showed  that  

-­holds  approve  of   the  project.  To   incorporate  the   needs   of   the   residents,   a   staff   designer  was  assigned  throughout  the  design  and  con-­struction  phase.  Extruded  curb  technology  was  used  rather  than  formed  curbs,  which  would  have  required  repaving  the  street  to  current  standards.  City  landscape  crews  also  worked  with   residents   to   plant   trees   and   lay   sod.  Funding  was   obtained   through   two   sources:  a  Community  Development  Block  Grant-­  due  to  the  status  of  the  neighborhood  as  low  in-­come-­  and  a  small  neighborhood  grant  of  City  funds.  Since  the  funding  source  was  limited  in  the  long-­run,  it  did  not  allow  more  than  sev-­eral  thousand  linear  feet  of  improvements  to  be  accomplished  city-­wide  in  one  given  year.    Thus,   the  project  was   carried  out   in   phases  over  a  number  of  years.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeThe   results   were   widely   appreciated   by   the  southeastern  quarter  neighborhoods.  Pedest-­rians  have  an  unimpeded  path  beside  the  road    that    is  now    pro-­tected  by  attractive  plantings.  The  three  speed  humps  installed  

-­age  of  12  miles  per  hour.  Residents   themselves  appreciate   the  improvements  and  view  it  as  public  investment  to  bring  adequate  standards  to  their  neighborhood.

Below:  Extruded  curb  technology  is  used  to  install  curbs.    By  using  this  technology,  the  Seattle  DOT  avoided  costly  street  repaving  and  still  accomplished  its  goal  to  formalize  the  street  because  ex-­truded  curbs  can  be  freestanding.

Page 24: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 24

Below:  Reinvestment  in  thepedestrian  experience  includednew  brick  pavers,  bluestonepedestrian  crossings,  a  plantingstrip,  new  lighting,  bike  racks,and  trash  receptacles.  Theseimprovements  proved  essentialto  new  retail  business  growth  onthis  D.C.  street

CASE  STUDY  5:  ECONOMIC  DISINVESTMENTLocationWashington,  D.C.

Problem

-­est  commercial  corridors.  The  century  old  buildings  in  the  oldest  commercial  strip  give  the  street  charm  and  character,  but  over  the    years  it    had    experienced  economic  disinvestment.    Vacant    storefronts  and  loitering  added  to  the  perception  that  8th  Street  was  an  unsafe  place  to  be  and  shop  after  dark.  Merchants  com-­plained  that  there  was  inadequate  public  parking.  Time  had  taken  its  toll  on  the  public  realm  which  was  left  with  cracked  concrete  sidewalks,   inconsistent   roadway-­focused   street   lighting,   inade-­quate  parking  and  weathered  and  unhealthy  street  trees.

BackgroundThe  Capitol  Hill  neighborhood  began  organizing  for  the  revitaliza-­

organization.  It  began  by  using  materials  and  following  the  model  

Street    program.  Continuous  efforts  to  improve  the  public  realm  along  the  street  fell  short  so  the  organization  expressed  concern  to  DDOT  and  a  study  of  local  streets  was  launched.    DDOT  con-­

-­duct  the  study  and  prepare  a  concept  plan.

SolutionThe  primary  goal   of   the  Barracks  Row   streetscape  project  was  to  create  a  safe  and  visually  appealing  pedestrian  environment  and  address  transportation  concerns  in  order  to  foster  business  and   retail   growth   in   the   area.   The   public   realm   on   8th   Street  and  Barracks  Row  was  completely  reconstructed.  New  brick-­pav-­ers   were   installed   within   sidewalks,   and   key   pedestrian   cross-­

planting  strip  was  created  along  the  curb  to  absorb  surface  runoff  from  sidewalks  and  to  provide  a  continuous  root  zone  for  newly  planted   street   trees.     The   project   also   provided   for   new   globe  

organization.    Loriope  was  planted  in  tree  boxes  as  edging  and  a  public  park  was  replanted  and  enhanced.  In  response  to  concerns  

parking  was  created  along  the  street  to  replace  the  existing  paral-­lel  on-­street  parking.

Page 25: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROJECTS25

ing  spaces-­  which  are  short  time  meters  to  ensure  a  steady  sup-­

These  changes  were  made  to  help  revitalize  the  commercial  area,  one  of  the  oldest  in  the  District  of  Columbia.

Result  and  Application  for  Milwaukee

Since  1999,  43  new  businesses  have  opened  in  the  area  (includ-­ing  business  expansion   through  12  new  outdoor   cafes),  51   fa-­cades  have  been  restored,  198  net  new  jobs  have  been  created,  and  3  new  traditional  buildings  have  been  constructed.  Pedestri-­ans  now  have  a  safer  and  more  welcoming  environment  in  which  to  walk  around.

CASE  STUDY  6:  ROUNDABOUTLocation

Problem

about  area  resulted  in  vehicles  speed-­

hours.  Even  with  the  Tammany  Trace  pedestrian   and   bicycle   facility   adja-­cent  to  the  intersection,  the  environ-­

-­trict  remained  unsafe  for  pedestrians  

Background

Level  Street  as  well  as  the  two  highways.  The  complex  four-­way  

current  lighting  system  has  created  backups  which  extend  onto  the  freeways.

Solution

and   business   owners   in   the   vicinity,   the   transportation   depart-­ment   committed   to   take  actions   to  accommodate   the  needs  of  all  stakeholders  during  the  design  and  construction  phases.  The  

at  about  14,000  vehicles  a  day  pre-­Katrina  and  17,000  after  the

Above:  New  sidewalk  pavers,bluestone  pavers,  trash  recep-­tacles,  and  other  sidewalk  im-­provements  transformed  not  only  the  pedestrian  realm,  but  spurred  economic  development  in  Wash-­ington  D.C.

Page 26: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 26

Above:  A  new  roundabout-­  de-­

device  within  a  historic  district  toallow  for  easier  pedestrian  cross-­ing.

storm.  DDOT  overcame  the  challenges  by  selecting  the  smallest  diameter   roundabout   possible   to   accommodate   vehicles   (about  

a  non-­contributing  building  in  the  historic  district  to  provide  extra  

also  shifted  slightly  to  make  it  easier  for  pedestrians  and  bikers  to  cross  the  intersection.  Landscaping  and  more  directional  signs,  

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeStatistical   data   is   not   yet   available   for   the   project   but   studies  indicated  that  roundabouts  are  safer  for  drivers  and  pedestrians  

designed  for  high-­speed  motor  ways.    However,  since  speeding  

limit  at  the  roundabout  is  20  mile  per  hour.

CASE  STUDY  7:  MANAGING  STORMWATERLocationPortland,  Oregon

Problem

Montgomery   adjacent   to   Portland   State   University-­   needed   to  

street   trees,   landscaping,  street   lighting,  and  signage,  while  at  

Background-­-­

tems  to  manage  urban  stormwater  runoff.

SolutionThe  streetscape  project  not  only  manages  street  run-­off  but  also  maintains   strong   pedestrian   circulation   and   on-­street   parking.  

handle  approximately  8,000  square   feet  of   storm  water   runoff.  The  design  provides  water  quality  treatment  and  maximizes  in-­

to    access  their  vehicles  without  infringing  upon  the  stormwater  planters.    Perpendicular    pathways    were    created    between    each

Page 27: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROJECTS27

stormwater  planter  so  that  a  pedestrian  would  not  have  to  walk  -­

posure  at  each  planter  indicates  to  the  pedestrian  that  there  is  a  drop  in  grade.    Each  curb  cut  which  allows  the  street  runoff  to  en-­

Result  and  Application  forMilwaukeeThis  was  a  successful  “green  street”  project     and   it   has   won   a   National  

project   design   does   not   pose   safety  issues   for   pedestrians   or   for   people  getting   in   and   out   of   vehicles.   Fur-­ther,   it   has   demonstrated   how   both    new  and  existing  streets  in  downtown  or  highly  urbanized  areas  can  be  de-­signed    to  provide  direct  environmen-­

-­grated  into  the  urban  streetscape.

CASE  STUDY  8:  CREATING  SIDEWALKSLocationSnohomish  County,  Washington

ProblemThe   Lake   Serene   Community   was   forced   to   walk   in   the   travel  lanes  of  Serene  Way,  a  two-­lane  local  access  road.  Walkers  some-­times   had   to   jump   into   the   ditches   to   avoid   oncoming   cars   at  certain  blind  turns.

BackgroundThe  road  had  minimal  shoulders  and  drainage  from  the  road  col-­lected  into  open  ditches  along  both  sides  of  the  road.  The  existing  

-­ciation  initiated  the  project  by  requesting  a  sidewalk  be  built.

Above:  These  two  diagramsdepict  how  the  new  stormwaterrunoff  planters  work  duringheavy  rainfall

Below:  Birdseye  view  of  newstormwater  planters

Page 28: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 28

Above:  Before  and  After  viewsof  the  new  retention  area  andsidewallk

SolutionThe  project  has  several  main  objectives  which  include  provision  of  a  safe  walkway,  coordination  with  the  Lake    Serene  Commu-­nity  association,  minimizing  impacts  to  adjacent  properties,  and  

avoiding  the  use  of  a  detention  pond/pipe  design.  To  further  the  perception  of  safety,  the  4,500  linear  foot  walkway  was  designed  in  such  a  way  that   the  walkway   is   located  behind  the  drainage  ditches.    This  provides  a  buffer  between  cars,  bicyclists,  and  pe-­

-­destrian  facilities  and  provides  a  safer  route  to  school  for  students  of   a   local   elementary   school.   In   order   to  minimize   the   impact  on  adjacent  properties,  an  alignment  within  the  existing  right-­of-­way  was  chosen  that  would  meander  among  existing    project  site  features  such  as  fences,  trees  and  utility  poles.  Due  to  a  lack  of  

which  doubled  as  a  stormwater  drain.

Result  and  Application  for  Milwaukee

-­ditionally,  there  was  a  considerable  cost  savings  because  the  use  of  porous  concrete  material  enabled  the  walkway  to  be  built  by  eliminating  the  need  for  a  detention  system.

CASE  STUDY  9:  UNLIMITED  AND  UNDEFINED  ACCESSLocationCity  of  Des  Moines,  Washington

Problem

for  pedestrians.

Background-­

tions,   and   safety,   provide   facilities   for   transit   and   pedestrians,  and  encourage  economic  redevelopment  along  the  SR-­99  corridor  through  the  City  of  Des  Moines.

SolutionSR-­99  will  undertake  a  series  of  infrastructure  improvements  in-­cluding  the  placement  and  type  of  intersection  signals,  pedestrian  features,  access  control,  and  aesthetic  treatments  to  increase  ca-­

Page 29: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROJECTS29

features  that  will  be  considered  in  this  project  is  a  landscaped    me-­

existing  two-­way  left-­turn  lane  and  improve  both  pedestrian  and  

along  the  highway,  and  a  six-­foot  landscaped  planter  will  be  built  on  each  side  of  the  street.  The  project  will  also  install    equipment  

Moines  and  King  County  Metro  have  even  considered  the  instal-­

each  direction  of  the  route  as  well  as  bus  pullouts  and  new  transit  shelters.  To  further  enhance  pedestrian  activity,  sidewalks  will  be  installed  on  both  sides  of  the  highway  with  sidewalk  lighting  and  a  pedestrian-­activated  signal.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeThe   conditions   for   pedestrians   along   the   corridor   were   greatly  improved  and  the  efforts  of  the  transportation  department  were  appreciated  by  the  citizens  of  Des  Moines.  With  the  facility   im-­

Below:  A  conceptual  renderingof  the  SR-­99  corridor  with  road-­way  improvements.  Some  im-­provements  include  a  landscapedmedian,HOV  lane,  left-­turn  lane,bus  pullouts  and  transit  shelters,and  paved  crosswalks.

Page 30: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 30

CASE  STUDY  10:  TOTAL  FACILITIES  OVERHAULLocationCleveland  Heights,  Ohio

ProblemSeverance  Circle,  surrounded  by  a  high-­use  commercial  and  re-­tail  development  in  a  vital  suburb,  is  perceived  to  be  unfriendly  to  pedestrians  and  bicyclists.  Due  to  very   little  accommodation  for  pedestrians  and  bicyclists,  at  times  it  forces  them  to  cut  into  vehicular  lanes  at  the  risk  of  their  personal  safety.  Despite  being  enclosed  by  a  shopping  mall,  Severance  Circle  was  not  properly  connected  to  other  surrounding  land  uses.

BackgroundThe  Canyon  Johnson  Urban  Fund  purchased  the  land  and  rede-­veloped  the  center  in  2002.  They  agreed  to  dedicate  Severance  Circle  as  a  public  street  and  to  build  a  complete  sidewalk  system.  Funds  were  set  aside  by   the  buyer,   the  seller,  and   the  City   for  road  and  sidewalk  improvements.

SolutionWith  an  array  of  goals   formulated  by  the  Department  of   Planning   and   Development,   a   variety   of  measures  were   implemented.  These  measures   include  provision  of  benches  and  bus  shelters,  sidewalks    abutting    build-­ing   facades   to  provide  storefront  displays,  addition  of  pedestrian  activated  walk  signals  at  busy  intersections  and  at  mid-­block  crossings,  and  the  installation  of  light  

construction  projects  involved  converting  the  four-­lane  road  into  two-­lanes  with  a  center  left-­turn  lane  and  bike  

of  speeding  and  other  dangerous  driving  was  stepped  up,  and  numerous  tickets  were  issued.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeCompleted  in  2003,  the  street  project  has  formed  a  com-­plete  and  connected  sidewalk  system,  created  common  spaces,  and  installed  benches,  bus  shelters,  pedestrian-­scaled   lights,   trees,  and  other   landscaping.  Dedicated  bicycle   lanes  were  added  and   the   four-­lane   road  was  

been   reported   by   city   engineer   that   during   the   2003  

-­walks  and  crosswalks  were  also  used  by  pedestrians.

Below:  Bike  lanes,  mid-­block  crosswalks  and  signals,  benches  and  bus  shelters  were  added  to  Severence  Cirlce  to  enrich  the  pedestrian  experience  and  en-­courage  walking,  biking,  and  public  transit  instead  of  driving.

Page 31: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROGRAMS31

PROGRAM  BEST  PRACTICESThe   program  best   practices   are   short-­term   activities   or   events  designed   to   promote   and   encourage  walking.     They  may   have  long-­lasting  effects  on  the  community  or  city  where  implemented,  but  they  are  designed  to  achieve  short-­term  goals  and  address  

educating  the  public  or  encouraging  walking  as  a  viable  transpor-­tation  option  either  in  tandem  with  public  transit  and  biking  or  as  an  alternative  to  the  automobile.    Like  the  project  best  practices,  the  programs  are   from  around   the  country  and  provide  a  wide  range  of  urban  to  suburban  experiences.    

CASE  STUDY  1:  SAFETY  TRAININGLocation

BackgroundThe  safety    training    program  was  developed  to  improve  safety    

spent  on  adults.   In  2004,   the  City  of  Tucson   requested   federal  transportation  enhancement  funds  to  improve  pedestrian  safety  through  public  outreach  and  safety  training.

SolutionIn  order  to  reduce  pedestrian  and  automobile  roadway  crashes,  increase    awareness  of    pedestrian  responsibility  and  tolerance  of  all  right-­of-­way    users,  the  City  of    Tucson  developed    television  and  radio  public  service  announcements.  This  was  coupled  with  the  creation  of    educational  videos  for    police  training  as  well  as  

permanent  result.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeThe  City   installed  180  poster   sized   signs  promoting   the   “share  the    road”  ethic  at  bus  shelters  around  the  city.  These  signs  were  also  displayed   in   forty   (40)   libraries  and  bike  shops   to   reach  a  larger   audience.   Lastly,   there  was   a  monthly   safety   newsletter  

motorists-­  were   in  both  English   and  Spanish  and  available   on-­

activated  crosswalk)  signals  at  high  prioritization  location  in  the  Tucson-­Pima  County  region.

Below:  A  publication  by  the  City  of  Tucson  and  its  partners  for  educating  the  public  about  rules,  regulations,  activities,  and  safety  measures  for  pedestrian  and  bicyclists

PROGRAMS1.  SAFETY  TRAINING2.  “CROSS  SAFELY,            DRIVE  SAFELY”3.  EXTREME  POSTER          CAMPAIGN4.  PUBLIC  TELEVISION          SAFETY  VIDEOS5.  WALK  THERE!          CHALLENGE6.  BILINGUAL  SCHOOL          EDUCATION

Page 32: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 32

CASE  STUDY  2:  “CROSS  SAFELY,  DRIVE  SAFELY”Location

Background

University  of  Massachusetts   campus,  but   few  pedestrian  safety  

-­tionally,  since  2000  an  average  of  four  pedestrians  per  year  have  been  seriously  injured  by  drivers.  In  the  past,  after  a  complaint  was    made  about  either  a  pedestrian  or  a  driver  not  being  safe  

where   the  complaint  was  made.  Recognizing   the   lack  of   safety  

between   the  Governors  Highway  Safety  Bureau  and   the  UMass  College   of   Engineering   Transportation   Center-­   and   University  Police   partnered   together   and   created   the   “Cross   Safely   Drive  

education,  enforcement,  and  evaluation.

SolutionThe  program  included  an  awareness  campaign  along  with  a  judi-­cial  education    component.    Safety  tips    were  placed  on  posters  and  bus  cards  and  reinforced  through  media  coverage  to  remind  

the    program    violators  of  either    pedestrian  or  automobile  laws  

violation.    Each    handout    included    push    button  hand  operator  and  pedestrian  safety  tips.    For  the  second  month  violators  were  

local  media.

Result  and  Application  forMilwaukeeDespite   pedestrian   crashes   still   occur-­ring,   it   is   evident   that   motorists   are  more  aware  of  pedestrians.  More  motor-­ists  yielding  the  right-­of-­way  to  pedestri-­

aware  of  crosswalk  violations  which  has  led   to   more   consistent   enforcement   of  the    laws.  The  program  was  deemed  so    successful    that  UMass  has  continued  the  program   despite   running   out   of   grant  money.

importance  of  pedestrian/  mo-­torist  safety  on  campus.    Notice  the  “Cross  Safely  Drive  Safely”  poster  promoted  on  the  side  of  the  bus

Above:  The  “Cross  Safely  Drive  Safely”  Poster  which  was  hung  around  the  UMass  campus

Page 33: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROGRAMS33

CASE  STUDY  3:  EXTREME  POSTER  CAMPAIGNLocationOntario,  Canada

BackgroundOntario  recognized  a  lack  of  safe  habits  instilled  in  its  pedestrians  when,  in  2002,  the  City  of  Toronto  reported  more  than  half  of  all  

-­treme  nature  of  the  information,  the  Injury  Prevention  Coalition  created  an  extreme  poster  campaign  for  the  City.

SolutionThe  Injury  Prevention  Coalition    waged  a  media  campaign  with  the  slogan  “Cross  the  Street  as  if  Your  Life  Depends  on  it,  Because  it  Does”.  The  Coalition  sent  posters  and  brochures  to  over  900  com-­munity  agencies  and  also  had  posters  on  the  sides  of  over  thirty  

played  in  movie  theaters  for  the  audience  to  see  while  waiting  for  the  show  to  begin.  Funding  was  provided  through  a  number  of  local  contributions.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeThe  initial  launch  of  the  campaign    was  covered    by  local  media  outlets  to  help  get  the    message    out    about  both  the    campaign  and  the  message.    It  is    estimated    that  the  slideshow  in  movie  

to  education  and  awareness  for  pedestrians.  www.inavigait.com  

CASE  STUDY  4:  PUBLIC  TELEVISION  SAFETY  VIDEOSLocationBethesda,  Maryland

Background

created  for  playing  on  public  access  channels  in  Maryland.    These  videos  are  designed  to  educate  the  public  about  barriers  to  pe-­destrian  safety.

Solution

twenty-­eight  minute  episode.  Issues  are  brought  to  light  by  ex-­-­

issues  include  pedestrian  infrastructure,  planning  in  coordination  with  transit,  and  hazards  confronting  pedestrians.

Above:  The  Injury  Prevention  Coalition  poster  created  to  make  an  impact  in  Ontario

Page 34: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 34

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeOver  120    public  access    cable    stations  carry  the  episodes  each      month  in  addition  to  a  DISH  Network    channel.    Viewers  include  

-­chived  online  and    the  website  received    over  100,000  visitors  per  year.    The  program  is  now  archived  on  Google  Video  at:    http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=%22Perils+For+Pedestrians%22  

CASE  STUDY  5:    WALK  THERE!  CHALLENGELocation

Background

as  a  means  of  transportation  for  shorter,  neighborhood  trips.  To  

-­veloped  an  education  program  to  encourage  walking.

Solution

challenge  was   created.   The   challenge  was   for  members   of   the  

-­ticipated  in  promotional  events  to  raise  awareness  of  the  heath,  

were  given  out  to  participants  who  then  tracked  the  number  of  steps  they  took  each    week.    In  addition  to  the  challenge,  walking    maps  with  sites  within  easy  walking  distance  to  downtown  were  created  and  distributed.          

Result

2,000    pedometers    being    distributed.    The    challenge  was  also  followed  closely    by  the  local  media.    It  was  so  successful  that  an  expansion  of  the  challenge  is  currently  being  developed.

CASE  STUDY  6:    BILINGUAL  SCHOOL  EDUCATIONLocationSan  Diego,  California

BackgroundThough  there  was  some  pedestrian  education  already  in  schools,  it  was    noted  that    this  education    was  lacking    and    missing  the  

Above:  The  Walk  There  Challenge  is  an  ongoing  program  through  the  City  of  Atlanta.

Page 35: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    PROGRAMS35

pedestrian  child  safety  training  program  was  created  for  a  bilin-­gual  low-­income  school  where  the  majority  of  the  children  walked  to  school.

Solution

and  presented  in  both  English  and  Spanish.  Moreover,  standard  videos  and  images  typically  used    for  presentations  were  replaced  

presentation  more  interactive  for  students.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeePost-­presentation   survey   and   analysis   (two   weeks   after)   indi-­cated   that   students   retained   the   information   better   than  when  

parents,   Safety   Patrol,   and   siblings   were   responsible   for   their  safety  was  overcome  to  help  them  realize  they  themselves  must  be  responsible  pedestrians.    Moreover,  the  thought  that  “Cars  will  always  stop   for  kids”  was  challenged  and  the  students   realized  that  this  is  not  always  the  case.  

Above:  A  neighborhood  image  used  in  the  school  education  pro-­gram.    The  image  shows  students  inappropriately  crossing  the  street  without  looking  for  oncom-­

Page 36: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 36

POLICY  BEST  PRACTICESThe  policy  best  practices  are  long-­term  solutions  to  enhance  the  pedestrian  realm.    Some  policies  take  immediate  action  to  impact  the  physical  nature  of  a  space  or  an  entire  municipality.    Other  policies  take  aim  at  a  social,  behavioral  problem  that  training,  ed-­ucation,  and  reinforcement  of  good  practice  is  hopeful  to  change.  Some  solutions  are  directly  applicable  while  others  offer  pieces  which  might  be  compatible   in  Milwaukee.    While   this   list   is  not  comprehensive,  these  six  policy  case  studies  are  intended  to  give  an  idea  of  the  wide  range  of  possible  policy  solutions  the  City  of  Milwaukee  must  consider.    

CASE  STUDY  1:  LOCAL  COMPLETE  STREETSLocationThroughout  the  nation

BackgroundStreets    designed    with  only  the    car  in  mind  limit  the    option  of  mode  choice  in  mobility.    These  types  of  streets  can  be  danger-­ous  for  bicyclists  and    pedestrians  due  to  their  lack  of  amenities  offered    for  these  mode  types.    In  order  to    plan  for  and  fund  all  modes  of  transportation,  the  National  Complete  Street  Coalition  was    formed  and  as  a  result,  the  complete    streets  policy  move-­ment  has  been  adopted  by  municipalities  nationwide.

SolutionOne  solution  to  an  automobile  oriented  street  construction  policy    has  been  the  introduction  of  “complete  streets”  policies.  Complete  Streets  policies  have  been  adopted  throughout  the  nation  at  the  state  and  local  levels  through  ordinances  and  resolutions  through  quasi-­public  agencies,  and  through  comprehensive  plans    and  de-­sign  manuals.    These  policies  ensure  that  all  users  of  the  streets  are  kept   in  mind  when  constructing  or   improving  a  street.  The  general   policy   framework   for   complete   streets  policies   includes    

-­-­-­

This    comprehensive  approach  ensures  a  complete  policy  in  which  all  users  are  kept  in  mind  and  all  departments  know  the  approach  as  they  work  on  individual  projects.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeThe  passing  of  Complete  Streets  policies  has  resulted  in  several  

Above:  The  National  Complete  Streets  Coalition  is  the  founder  and  all-­knowing  source  for  Com-­plete  Streets

Above:  A  complete  street  in  Port-­land,  Oregon  accommodates  the  automobile,  bicycle,  and  pedes-­trian  in  the  right-­of-­way.

POLICIES1.  LOCAL  COMPLETE          STREETS2.  ELEMENTARY  SCHOOL          EDUCATION3.  PEDESTRIAN  AND          BICYCLE  TRAVEL  POLICY4.  CORRIDOR  TRAFFIC          CALMING5.  TRAFFIC  OFFICER          TRAINING6.  INJURY  PREVENTION          PROGRAM

Page 37: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    POLICIES37

ordinance  requiring  all  Seattle  DOT  projects  to  implement  com-­

drawn   from   for   the   implementation   of   the   policy.   Seattle   also  includes   critical   elements   of   operations   and  maintenance   in   its  policy  so  regular  improvements  can  be  made  to  the  existing  in-­frastructure.

CASE  STUDY  2:  ELEMENTARY  SCHOOL  EDUCATIONLocationOrange  County,  Florida

Background

County  realized  a  lack  of  safe  pedestrian  training  for  students  in  

engineering    specialists,  the    local  school    board,  and    advocacy  organizations  to  educate  and  train  students

SolutionWithin  the  elementary  age,  there  was  a  big  push  to  promote  “Walk  Your  Child  to  School  Day”  to  help  facilitate  parents  to  be  a  teacher  to  their  children  of  safe  pedestrian  habits.  Moreover,  a  pedestrian  component  was  added   to  Safety  Villages   that  were  already     in  

them  general  safety  around  the  house  and  when  out   in  public.  With  older  students  of  the  Middle  and  High  School  age,  safe  pe-­destrian  habits  were  taught  through  different  media    formats    and    both    active  and    passive  teaching.  These  included  direct  in-­class  

videos,  and  also  posters.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeThe  process  to  develop  the  curriculum  took  one  and  a  half  years.  It  was  accomplished  by  education  specialists,   law  enforcement,  

pedestrian  laws    (i.e.  “what    constitutes    jaywalking?”)  was  ac-­complished.  

CASE  STUDY  3:  PEDESTRIAN  AND  BICYCLE  TRAVEL  POLICYLocationThe  State  of  Kentucky

Background-­

Above:  Students  attract  attention  to  their  new  pedestrian  training  program  by  walking  the  streets

Page 38: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 38

of  Kentucky  created  the  Pedestrian  and  Bicycle  Design  Guidance  Task  Force.  The  goal  of  the  Task  Force  was  to  help  guide  the  Ken-­tucky  Transportation  Cabinet  by  creating  policies  regarding  when,  where,  and  how  to  implement  bicycle  and  pedestrian  facilities.

SolutionThe   Task   Force   was   able   to   have   design     guidelines   signed   in  

-­velop.  The  guidelines  ensure  that  with  all  new  and  reconstruct-­ed  roadways  pedestrians  and  bicyclists  are  kept  in  mind.    These  

-­modating  pedestrians,  including  land  use,  existing  transportation  networks,  transit  stops,  and  public  demand.  

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeThrough  the  passing  of  the  Pedestrian  and  Bicycle  Travel  Policy,  not  only    has  the    safety  of  pedestrian    and  bicyclists  increased,  but  so  has  non-­motorized  travel.    In  just  three  years  the  number  

is  also  expected  that  this  policy  will  reduce  vehicle  miles  traveled  and  improve  air  quality  in  the  state.

CASE  STUDY  4:  CORRIDOR  TRAFFIC  CALMINGLocation

Background

survey   determined   this   concern  was   valid   and   indeed   harming  

-­tives  from  the  Department  of  Transportation,  police  department,  

with  generating  a  solution  for  the  community.

Solution-­

white  road  edge  markings,  pavement  markings,  and  pedestrian    signs.    School  buses  were  also  contributing  to  the  speeding  issue  and  the  school  board  agreed  to  ensure  that  the  posted  speed  limit  would  be  followed  by  bus  drivers.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeDuring  an  informal  survey  process  evaluating  the  potential  imple-­mentation  of  the    solutions,  there  was  nearly  unanimous  support  

Page 39: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

BEST  PRACTICE  CASE  STUDIES    POLICIES39

the  initiative  taken  by  community  members  to  bring  a  pressing  issue  to  light,  saying  the  Department  would  not  have  made  the  improvements  if  the  community  had  not  spoken  up.

CASE  STUDY  5:  TRAFFIC  OFFICE  TRAININGLocationMadison,  Wisconsin

Background-­

destrian    issues  which    included  both  safety  and  pedestrian  laws.  -­

trian  issues  during  driver  education  courses.

Solution

Copies  of    this  DVD    were  distributed  to  high    school  and  private  

Result  and  Application  for  Milwaukee

instructors  on  pedestrian  related  issues.    Due  to  the  successful-­ness  of  the    DVD,    the  city  is    now    working    to  create  a  training  book  which  will  help  in  training  the  public  in  the  future.

CASE  STUDY  6:  INJURY  PREVENTION  PROGRAMLocationMiami-­Dade  County,  Florida

BackgroundIn  the  state  of  Florida,  Miami-­Dade  County  had  the  highest  num-­ber  of  pedestrian  injuries.  Moreover,  it  is  the  third  highest  in  the  nation.  Recognizing   this,  and   the  associated  costs  of   the  prob-­lem  presented,  the  Florida  DOT  lookedfor  the  causes,  effects,  and  then  solutions  to  the  high  pedestrian  injury  rate.

Solution

process  was  to  analyze  hospital  records  of  those  injured,  conduct  crash  scene  visits,  speak  with  patients  and  their  families  directly

Above:  A  training  video  from  the  Madison  Police  Department  depicts  a  common  confusing  sce-­

Page 40: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 40

pedestrian  crashes.  It  was  discovered  that  many  sites  had  issues    regarding    obstructed  views  and  long  distances  between  marked    intersections.    It  was  also  noted  that  293  of  the  crashes  were  with  

developed  an   injury  prevention  program  and   implemented   it   in  184  elementary  schools.  The  program  was  taught  to  students  for  a  half-­hour  session  once  per  week  over  a  4  week  period.

Result  and  Application  for  MilwaukeeWith  the  utilization  of  pre  and  post  tests  it  was  discovered  that  gains  in  pedestrian  knowledge  was  maintained  for  at  least  a  three  month   period-­  when   the   second   post   test  was   conducted.   The  number  of  children  admitted  to  a  Level  1  trauma  center  in  Miami-­Dade  as  a  result  of  a  pedestrian  injury  dropped  from  ninety-­three  

Above:  Children  participate  in  a  safe  pedestrian  program.

Page 41: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 42: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 43: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

MILWAUKEE  SITE  SELECTION43

MILWAUKEE  SITE  SELECTION-­

cess.    It  was  conducted  to  decide  which  two  focus  areas  the  Plan-­ning  Group  would  focus  on  for  pedestrian  improvements.

To  Begin,  data  was  gathered  for  the  past  three  years  of  auto-­  pe-­

interactive   mapping   website,   “Compass”.   This   data   contained  

-­dress  locations  of  the  crashes  needed  to  be  cleaned  in  order  for  

layer  from  Map  Milwaukee.

-­curacy,  a  point  density  geoprocessing  tool  was  utilized  to  gain  fur-­ther  understanding  of  crash  clustering  effects  over  the  last  three  years(essentially  a  hotspot  analysis  technique).  Upon  creation  of  

number   of   crashes   at   the   same   location.   Each   location   with   a  summary  of  greater  than  two  crashes  was  analyzed  to  determine  if   it   fell  within  an  area  that  the  hotspot   image  determined  as  a  frequent  crash  location.  If  it  did  fall  within  this  area  it  was  further  examined   for   such   criteria   as:   number   in   intersecting   streets,  number  of  crashes,  alternate  transportation  access,  speed  limits,  and   land  use.   If   the   location   fell   outside  a  hotspot,   it  was  dis-­missed  from  further  analysis.

-­cated  that  over  the  last  three  years,  two  sites  had  

crashes.     The   two   sites   chosen  were   North   91st  Street  &  West   Silver   Spring  Drive,   and   at   South  

why   these   sites   where   chosen   above   the   rest   is  because  of  their  high  crash  counts,  variety  of  uses,  structures  near  the  street,  and  the  framework  of  these   streets   are   typical   throughout   Milwaukee,  making  a  model  more  adaptable  to  other  parts  of  the  city  in  future  studies.

Once  the  site  selection  process  was  complete,  the  group  was  able  to  conduct  research  on  best  prac-­tice  case  studies  to  determine  which  projects,  pro-­grams,  and  policies  were  best  applicable  to  the  two  Milwaukee  sites.

Page 44: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 44

Page 45: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

MILWAUKEE  SITE  SELECTION45

Page 46: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 47: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  A:  91st  STREET  &  SILVER  SPRING  DRIVE47

The  map  on  page  48  titled  “Crash  Frequency:  

the  crash  frequency  for  the  intersection  of  S.  -­

calculates  the  number  of  points  (crashes)  with  in  a  1/4  mile  radius.    The  output  of  the  point  density  tool  is  an  image  with  a  color  ramp  dis-­playing  greater  number  of  crashes  in  the  area  as  a  darker  color,  i.e.  blue.  Because  this  inter-­section  has   such  a  high  number  of   crashes,  and  in  tern  a  high  number  of  points,  a  ratio  of  1:1  (points  to  crashes),  enabled  this  location  to  have  a  high  density  of  crashes.

91ST  AND  SILVER  SPRINGUpon  completion  of  the  GIS  analysis,  the  intersection  of  N  91st  Street  &  W  Silver  Spring  Drive  (CTH  E)  in  the  north  side  of  Mil-­waukee  was  one  of  the  two  sites  used  to  conduct  research  on  best  practices.    This  site,  along  with  the  intersection  of  N  35th  Street  &  W  Capitol  Drive  (STH  190),  was  the  intersection  with  the  highest  pedestrian  crash  rates  in  the  City  of  Milwaukee.    This  intersection  

limits  of  35  miles  per  hour  on  91st  Street  and  40  miles  per  hour  on  Silver  Spring  Drive.    This  intersection  has  a  similar  framework  as  other  intersections  seen  throughout  the  City  of  Milwaukee.

TARGET  AREA  A

SITE  SELECTIONThe  map  to  the  right,  titled  “Crash  Location:  N.  91st  St.  and  W.  

and  the  land  uses  surrounding  the  intersection.

Image  from  the  Wisconsin  De-­partment  of  Transportation’s  

Volume  Data”

Page 48: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 48

Page 49: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  A:  91st  STREET  &  SILVER  SPRING  DRIVE49

WALK  SCOREThe  Walk  Score  for  the  neighborhoods  around  the  intersection  of  91st  and  Silver  Spring  is  comprised  of  the  Silver  Swan  Neighbor-­hood  and  the  Valhalla  neighborhood.    The  table  on  the  right  indi-­cates  where  each  of  these  neighborhoods  ranks  amongst  Milwau-­kee  neighborhoods.    The  Silver  Swan  neighborhood  score  is  50.    

The  overall  Walk  Score  for  the  area  is  a  car-­dependent  38.    The  

services  in  the  areas.    Because  of  the  low  number  of  intersections  in  the  area  and  long  block  lengths,  this  area  is  ranked  negatively  on   pedestrian   friendliness.    While   it   does   have   high   scores   for  walking  distance  to  schools  (Bryant  Elementary  only)  and  bank-­

restaurant  choices  which  are  not  fast  food.    Providing  access  to  better  food  choices  is  one  way  Milwaukee  can  encourage  walking  and  promote  a  healthier   lifestyle   for   its   residents.     In  addition,  by   locating   smaller   scale   neighborhood   services   within   shorter  distances,  the  City  can  better  connect  people  to  other  modes  of  transportation  and  increase  the  frequency  of  walking.Better   urban   design   of   block  lengths   and   street   amenities  will   provide   a   safer,   less   car-­dependent  walking  experience  at  91st  and  Silver  Spring.

Page 50: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 50

Above:  Because  of  the  placement  mailboxes,  cars  dropping  off  mail  pose  a  serious  safety  risk  for  pe-­destrians  on  the  sidewalk

Below:  Mid-­block  crossing  was  an  observed  problem.    A  pedestrian  chooses  to  cross  mid-­block  in-­stead  of  at  the  designated  cross-­walk  at  the  intersection  of  91st  and  Silver  Spring

STAKEHOLDERSThe  Planning  Group  conducted,  or  attempted  to  conduct,  stake-­

-­pose  of  all  the  interviews  was  to  identify  pedestrian  issues,  the  format  and  focus  of  the  questionnaires  varied.  The  goal  of  each  interview  was  to  gain  insight  into  their  perception  of  the  pedes-­trian  experience.    We  also  wanted  to  know  if  they  were  aware  of  issues  or  if  they  had  any  suggestions  for  improvements.  

2nd  District  Alderman  Joe  Davis-­

garding  the  pedestrian  study  of  N.  91st  Street  and  Silver  Spring  Drive.    Every  attempt  for  correspondence  yielded  no  results.

Gas  Station  Owner-­

tion  at  this   intersection  to  obtain  a  better  understanding  of  the  

improvements.    The  owner  of  this  particular  gas  station  is  also  the  owner  of  the  gas  station  located  on  the  northwest  corner  of  the  block.    He  expressed  words  of  concern  for  the  pedestrians  cross-­ing  the  intersection  in  every  direction.    He  mentioned  that  a  lot  of  people  would  seek  shelter  from  the  rain  or  snow  under  the  gas  

Because  he  owns  both  gas  stations  at  the  intersection,  he  notices  

When  asked  if  he  had  any  indication  why  he  thinks  this  may  be,  

same  at  both  gas  stations.  He  was  also  asked  if  he  had  any  sug-­gestions  or  additional  comments  to  which  he  replied  that  N.  91st  Street  needs  surface  improvements  because  there  are  many  pot-­holes-­  making  the  road  unsafe  for  cars  and  people.

Postmaster

any  real  problems  with  the  intersection,  and  no  costumers  have  

the   locations  of   their  drop  boxes.    The   fenced  parking   lot  does  -­

vide  an  employee  count  of  those  that  take  an  alternate  form  of  transportation  other  than  personal  vehicle  to  work.    Furthermore,  the  postmaster  was  also  unable  to  provide  us  with  the  number  of  

Page 51: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  A:  91st  STREET  &  SILVER  SPRING  DRIVE51

Below:  A  very  unfriendly  pedes-­trian  experience

Bottom:  It  was  observed  that  there  is  a  heavy  use  of  the  Mil-­waukee  County  Transit  System  at  this  intersection.

PUBLIC  INTERVIEWS-­  FIELD  SURVEY

analysis.    In  order  to  do  so,  pedestrians  were  asked  four  ques-­tions:   do   you   generally   feel   safe   crossing   in   this   intersection,  what  do  you  like  about  the  reconstruction  and  did  it  improve  your  accessibility,  do  you  think  there  are  problem  areas  when  walking  across  or  around  this  intersection,  and  if  you  could  change  or  add  something  to  the  intersection,  what  might  it  be?

Pedestrian  Planning  Public  Interviews,  N.  91st  Street  and  W.  Sil-­ver  Spring  Drive

Wednesday  April  6,  2011

General  ObservationsWhile   group  members   sought   input   from   pedestrians,   we   also  observed  the  following:    -­  More  people  generally  arrived  in  the  vicinity  right  before  the          bus  arrived    -­  The  majority  of  pedestrians  (estimated  90%)  used  the  conven-­        ience  store  (northwest  corner)    -­  School  buses  drop  off  students  at  all  corners  of  the  intersection    -­  MCTS  driver  said  the  intersection  is  always  busy  with  pedest-­        rians  and  she  has  never  experienced  any  complaints    -­  There  are  a  lot  of  police  in  marked  and  unmarked  cars  patrol-­        ing  the  area    -­  One  bike  rider  was  seen  during  the  duration  of  the  interviews.            He  was  riding  north  on  91st  in  the  street.    This  is  where  there          is  no  sidewalk  along  the  west  property  line  of  Valhalla  Memo-­        rial  Park.    Once  he  was  north  of  Silver  Spring,  he  moved  onto          the  sidewalk

       overall  pedestrian  total  did  not  use  the  intersection  but  crossed          midblock  on  both  91st  north  of  Silver  Spring  and  Silver  Spring          west  of  91st.    Nearly  all  trips  were  to  and  from  the  convenience          store  at  the  northwest  corner    -­  One  (1)  respondent  who  indicated  they  felt  safe  and  the  inter-­        section  did  not  need  any  improvements  did  not  use  the  inter-­

       ing  north,  they  crossed  91st  midblock  to  access  the  BP

       the  bus    -­  Pedestrians  would  have  to  reach  a  fast-­pace  walk  to  cross  the          entire  block  in  either  direction—north/south  or  east/west

Page 52: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 52

       to  the  gas  station  located  on  the  northwest  corner  of  the  inter-­        section  versus  the  gas  station  on  the  northeast  corner  (see  gas          station  stakeholder  summary)

Interview  Totals    -­  22  successful  interviews    -­  7  declined  to  interview  (people  who  were  approached  and  in-­        formed  of  our  purpose  and  then  declined)

   -­  1.5  hours  

QuestionsDo  you  generally  feel  safe  crossing  in  this  intersection?The  overwhelming  consensus  answer  for  this  question  was  yes,  people   generally   feel   safe   when   crossing   this   intersection.     Of  the   twenty-­two   (22)   respondents,   two   (2)   felt   that   safety  was  

What  do  you  like  about  the  reconstruction  and  did  it  improve  your  accessibility?

-­ing,  relining  and  new  intersection  features  were  an  improvement.    Of   those   that   responded   positively,   the   majority   of   responses  were   because   of   the   pedestrian   crosswalk   push   button   signals  that  were  put  in.    Other  responses  included  that  the  road  is  much  

lanes  were  an  improvement  along  Silver  Spring  (1),  and  the  cam-­eras  were  a  good  deterrent  for  crime  (1).    Finally,  one  respondent  felt  that  the  new  improvements  made  crossing  easier  and  helped  with  safety  of  pedestrians  who  were  being  clipped  by  cars  at  the  southwest  corner  of  the  intersection.

Do  you   think   there   are   problem  areas  when  walking   across   or  around  this  intersection?

issues.    Those  issues  included  three  (3)  problems  with  the  cross-­-­

cated  that  the  bus  stop  island  at  the  southeast  corner  of  the  inter-­section  is  never  shoveled  during  the  winter.    The  remaining  four  respondents   indicated   issues  with   the  general   intersection   that  were  external.    2  said  that  drivers  were  driving  too  fast  and  driv-­ers  running  the  yellow  and  red  lights  were  a  common  occurrence

Below:  Because  of  the  auto-­ori-­ented  nature  of  the  intersection  of  91st  and  Silver  Spring,  the  short  “walk”  signals  make  it  dif-­

Notice  the  pedestrian  cross  signal  and  the  position  of  the  woman  in  the  two  photos  below.  This  par-­ticular  woman  only  made  it  a  few  steps  before  the  signal  changed  to  “don’t  walk”

Page 53: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  A:  91st  STREET  &  SILVER  SPRING  DRIVE53

Below:  Dead-­end  sidewalks  im-­pede  pedestrian  mobility  at  the  southeast  corner

Above:  A  noticeable  improve-­ment  to  the  intersection  has  been  the  recent  addition  of  pedestrian  push-­button  cross  signals.

Below:  Despite  the  addition  of  cross  signals,  walk  timing  re-­mains  inadequate  so  pedestrian  must  stand  in  small  islands  in  the  

The   other   two   (2)   respondents   said   that   the   day   driving   was  

but  lighting  was  dim

If  you  could  change  or  add  something  to  the  intersection,  what  might  it  be?

be   a  welcomed   addition   to   this   intersection   to   deal   with   snow  

with  other  street  furnishings  including  garbage  cans  and  benches.    Two  respondents  also  said  they  would  like  to  see  more  mainte-­nance  when  things  break  or  in  an  effort  to  pick  up  trash.    Inter-­estingly,  no  one  commented  on  landscaping  or  trees.    Finally,  one  response  dealt  with  the  external  factor  that  drivers  needed  to  be  educated  on  the  presence  of  pedestrians  in  the  area.

The  following  is  a  summary  of  responses  to  this  particular  ques-­tion  and  the  number  of  people  with  the  response  in  parentheses:    -­  (5)  Bus  shelters

   -­  (1)  Make  drivers  more  aware  of  pedestrians

   -­  (1)  Crossing  guard  for  children    -­  (2)  More  garbage  cans            -­  Garbage  can  near  the  BP  gas  station      -­  (2)  Maintenance/clean  up    -­  (1)  Security  cameras    -­  (1)  Remove  cameras    -­  (1)  Increased  size  for  standing  on  corner.    Larger  Landing    -­  (1)  Go-­kart  or  automated  cross  walk

Additional  comments?We  concluded  each  questionnaire  by  giving   the  participants  an  opportunity  to  give  any  additional  comments  which  may  relate  to  their  walking  experience.    The  following  is  a  summary  list  of  the  additional  comments:    -­  (1)  Respondent  does  not  live  in  the  area

Page 54: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 54

RECOMMENDATIONSThe  intersection  of  91st  and  Silver  Spring  is  a  common  intersec-­tion  found  throughout  Milwaukee.    That  is,  it  has  similar  features  -­  speed  limits,  number  of  lanes,  surrounding  land  use  -­  as  other  intersections  around  Milwaukee  and  thus  acts  as  a  perfect  model  for  our  research.    The  recommendations  for  this  intersection  deal  with  aesthetics,  some  of  which  the  WISDOT  has  already  begun  to  address,  and  pedestrian  safety  and  comfort.  Because  of   the  high  rates  of  speed,  surrounding  residential  land  uses,  and  high  level  of  transit  ridership,  these  recommendations  focus  on  what  can  best  be  done  to  serve  those  that  live  in  the  vicinity  and  use  public  transit.

ProjectIt   is   the   recommendation   of   this   plan   that   based   on   the   com-­

following  projects  be  taken  into  consideration  for  implementation.    

to   bus   shelters.    Overhauling   these   facilities  will   allow   the   pe-­destrians  to  remain  safe  and  comfortable  at  the  bus  stop  during  poor  to  extreme  weather  conditions.    Best  Practice  Management  (BPM)  project  case  study  number  ten  (10)  better  illustrates  how  a  total  facility  overhaul  can  better  improve  a  street  intersection.    Furthermore,  controlling  the  crosswalk  so  that  pedestrians  have  a  safe  and  visible  path  to  cross  is  a  necessity.    BPM  case  study  one  (1)   is  a  prime  example  how  instilling  a  crosswalk  light  and  visible  markers  led  to  the  reduction  of  pedestrian  crashes.    When  interpreting   these   case   studies   there   is   an  over  arching   theme  

ideal  representation  of  all  types  of  transportation,  including  non-­

Program“Cross  Safely,  Drive  Safely”This  program  has  the  potential  to  work  well  around  the  91st  and  Silver  Spring  intersection.    Interviews  with  pedestrians  in  the  area  indicated   two   items   that   would  make   this   program   successful.    First,  pedestrians  were  concerned  about  the  speed  of  drivers.    On  the  UMass  campus  where  this  program  took  place,  drivers  were  

to  stop  automobiles  and  educate  the  drivers,  not  just  about  the  posted  speed  limit,  but  about  the  need  to  be  aware  of  pedestrians  at  the  intersection.

-­gram  applicable  is  the  short  (time)  crosswalk  signals.    This  issue  is  two  fold.  First,  the  timers  need  to  be  addressed  to  ensure  ped-­

Page 55: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  A:  91st  STREET  &  SILVER  SPRING  DRIVE55

estrians  a  safe  amount  of  time  to  cross.    Second,  the  intersection  creates  an  environment  that  encourages  pedestrians  to  practice  unsafe  habits.    When  the  lights  are  too  short  for  the  amount  of  time  it  takes  to  cross  the  street,  pedestrians  are  more  likely  to  

implementation  of  “Cross  Safely,  Drive  Safely,”  pedestrians  in  the  area  will  be  educated  about  safe  habits  and  the  dangers  of  jutting  

PolicyMore  frequent  maintenance

maintenance  and  a  general  lack  of  cleaning-­up  of  the  area.    Many  of  the  pedestrians  interviewed  indicated  there  is  a  clear   lack  of  garbage   cans,   especially   around  bus   stops.     Respondents   indi-­cated  they  felt  that  if  garbage  cans  were  available  it  would  help  

people  felt  there  is  a  lag  time  between  when  something  breaks  

time  to  broken  items  will  help  ensure  that  both  pedestrians  and  

Red  light  camerasDuring   the   reconstruction  of   the   intersection   red-­light   cameras  were  added.    Interviews  indicated  that  pedestrians  liked  the  ad-­dition  and  would  like  to  see  more.    This  was  due  to  the  perception  that  they  helped  reduce  crime,  increasing  the  perception  of  safety  at  night.    Due  to  this,  the  continued  use  of  the  cameras  is  recom-­mended.    Moreover,  if  they  break  they  should  be  replaced  and  not  simply  taken  down.

Page 56: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 57: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE57

6TH  AN  LINCOLN  AVENUE

south  side  of  Milwaukee  was  the  second  site  used  to  conduct  re-­search  on  best  practices.    This  site  had  the  third  highest  number  

of  approximately  10,200  and  posted  speed  limits  of  20  miles  per  

-­work  as  other  highly  traveled  intersections  seen  throughout  the  City  of  Milwaukee  and  thus  was  used  as  a  local  case  study.

TARGET  AREA  B

SITE  SELECTION  The   map   to   the   right,   titled   “Crash  

the  orientation  and  the  land  uses  sur-­rounding  the  intersection.    The  most  prominent  use  is  the  religious  institu-­tion   on   the   southwest   corner   of   the  intersection,  Basilica  of  St.  Josaphat.

The   map   on   page   58   titled   “Crash  

-­-­

gram  calculates  the  number  of  points  (crashes)   within   a   1/4   mile   radius.    The  output  of  the  point  density  tool  is  an   image  with  a  color  ramp  display-­ing  the  greater  number  of  crashes  in  the  area  as  a  darker  color,   i.e.  blue.    Because  this   intersection  has  such  a  high  number  of  crashes,  and  in  tern  a  high  number  of  points,  a  ratio  of  1:1  (points  to  crashes),  enabled  this  loca-­tion  to  have  a  high  density  of  crashes.    This  location  has  a  high  crash  density  rating  and  the  frequency  increases  as  one  heads  toward  the  northeast,  i.e.  the  city  center.

Image  from  the  Wisconsin  De-­partment  of  Transportation’s  

Volume  Data”

Page 58: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 58

Page 59: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE59

WALK  SCOREThe  Walk  Score  for  the  Lincoln  Village  neighborhood,  which  the  

the  right  indicates  where  the  Lincoln  Village  neighborhood  ranks  

higher  Walk  Score.    There  are  12,190  people,  or  2%  of  Milwau-­

with  a  52.    There  are  seven  bus  routes  nearby.

-­dius  and  the  average  block  length  is  also  good  at  390  feet.  Short  block  lengths  and  a  large  number  of  intersections  makes  walking  more  convenient,  safer,  and  more  visually  interesting  as  there  is  more  change  for  both  pedestrians  and  automobiles,  and  a  higher  diversity  of  walking  routes  for  pedestrians.  The  area  also  ranks  well  in  food  choices,  parks,  and  schools.

Sixth  and  Lincoln,  while  not  among  the  top  Walk  Scores  in  Mil-­waukee,  shows  how  better  urban  design  -­  smaller  block  lengths,  good  amenities  and  services,  and  a  number  of  intersections  makes  walking  better  and  more  likely  to  occur.    The  density  and  diversityof   uses   in   this   neighborhood  indicates  that  there  is  more  to  walkability   than   infrastructure  improvements  and  programs.    

Page 60: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 60

PUBLIC  INTERVIEWS-­  FIELD  SURVEY

analysis.    In  order  to  do  so,  pedestrians  were  asked  four  ques-­tions:  do  you  generally  feel  safe  crossing  in  this  intersection,  do  you  think  there  is  a  difference  between  day  and  night  in  regards  to  how  the  intersection  operates,  do  you  think  there  are  problem  areas  when  walking  across  or  around  this  intersection,  and  if  you  could  change  or  add  something  to  the  intersection,  what  might  it  be?

Pedestrian  Planning  Public  Interviews,  S.  6th  Street  and  W.  Lin-­coln  Avenue

General  Observations    -­  More  people  generally  arrived  in  the  vicinity  right  before  the          bus  arrives    -­  There  is  a  lot  of  police  in  both  marked  cars  and  on  bicycle        patrolling  or  driving  through  the  intersection/area    -­  There  were  several  children  with  adults  and  students  during          the  interview  timeframe.    Most  were  waiting  for  the  bus

Interview  Totals    -­  Thirty-­Two  (32)  successful  interviews    -­  Twelve  (12)  declined  to  interview  (people  who  were  approached          and  informed  of  our  purpose  and  then  declined)            -­  Two  (2)  did  not  speak  English

   -­  Roughly  73%  of  people  responded  (32/44  =  72.7%)    -­  1.5  hours    -­  There  was  a  visually  noticable  diversity  of  races    -­  12  of  32  respondents  were  female

QuestionsDo  you  generally  feel  safe  crossing  in  this  intersection?Just  over  half  of  the  respondents  (18)  felt  safe  when  crossing  the  

safe  only  some  of  the  time.  The  main  issues  outlined  by  the  eight  respondents  who  did  not  feel  safe  were  that  drivers  did  not  obey  

acknowledged  that  reckless  or  unobservant  drivers  were  an  issue.  

Page 61: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE61

at  all  time.    Finally,  it  is  interesting  to  note  that  one  respondent  who  felt  safe  said  so  only  because  her  children  were  not  with  her.    She  acknowledged  that  having  her  children  makes  her  feel  unsafe  because  of  the  chance  of  them  being  struck  by  an  automobile.

Do  you   think   there   are   problem  areas  when  walking   across   or  around  this  intersection?

are  no  problem  areas  that  stand  out.    Of  those  17  respondents  who  indicated  there  was  a  problem,  5  people  indicated  that  it  was  not   the   intersection,   but   drivers   being   reckless   or   not   obeying  

stopping  or  running  yellow  and  red  lights.    Three  (3)  respondents  said  that  the  right  turn  only  lane  onto  Chase,  going  east  on  Lin-­

Three  (3)  people  also  indicated  that  the  lights  at  both  Chase  and  Lincoln  were  confusing  and  caused  people  to  speed  to  beat  the  

because  of  cars  turning  right  onto  Chase  from  Lincoln  and  cannot  be  seen  or  did  not  look  for  pedestrians.    There  were  four  (4)  other  concerns  which  included  maintenance  issues  and  cracks  in  pave-­ment  being  problems  for  the  elderly,  the  crosswalk  lines  are  hard  to  see,  and  cross  signals  are  too  short.

Do  you  think  there  is  a  difference  between  day  and  night  in  re-­gards  to  how  the  intersection  operates?When  asked  if  there  was  any  difference  between  how  the  inter-­section  operates  during  the  day  or  at  nights,  the  responses  were  very   evenly   divided.   The  majority   (13)   of   respondents   did   not  

do  not  go  out  at  night  in  the  neighborhood.  Ten  (10)  of  the  32  respondents   said   that   there   is   no   difference   between   day   and  

Nine  (9)  of  the  32  respondents  said  that  there  was  a  difference  between  day  and  night  at  the  intersection.    Of  those  nine  (9)  re-­

that  night  time  drivers  were  more  hectic  including  one  response  which  mentioned  drunk  driving.  Overall,   two  respondents  com-­mented  on  the  presence  of  gangs,  prostitution,  or  drugs   in  the  area.

If  you  could  change  or  add  something  to  the  intersection,  what  might  it  be?The  largest  number  of  responses  to  the  question  pertained  to  the  

Page 62: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 62

crosswalk  markings.     Respondents   suggested   repainting   of   the  directional  and  crosswalk  lines  in  the  roads  (7).    Other  responses  that  received  a  high  rate  of  response  were  to  add  more  bus  shel-­ters  or  benches  (4  each),  make  drivers  more  aware  of  pedestri-­ans  (3),  and  to  increase  the  walk  signals  for  pedestrian  (5).    One  respondent  indicated  that  not  only  would  longer  crosswalk  signals  

see  would  be  useful.

The  following  is  a  summary  of  responses  to  this  particular  ques-­tion  and  the  number  of  people  with  the  response  in  parentheses:

   -­  (1)  Repave  roads    -­  (7)  Repaint  street  and  crosswalk  lines    -­  (2)  More  signs  for  Right  turn  onto  Chase  from  Lincoln

           -­  Every  corner  with  bus  stop

   -­  (1)  More  lighting    -­  (1)  More  police  patrols    -­  (3)  Make  drivers  more  aware  of  pedestrians    -­  (5)  Longer  walk  signals

   -­  (1)  Pick  up  garbage

Additional  comments?The  Planning  Group  concluded  each  questionnaire  by  giving  the  participants   an   opportunity   to   give   any   additional   comments  which  may  relate  to  their  walking  experience.    The  following  is  a  summary  list  of  the  comments:    -­  (1)  Like  the  intersection    -­  (2)  Does  not  live  in  area

                 Beecher  St.  intersection    -­  (1)  The  fountain  at  northeast  corner  is  nice  in  the  summer    -­  (1)  Was  hit  by  driver  at  one  point  on  northwest  corner  of                    intersection

Page 63: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE63

PUBLIC  PARTICIPATION  OPEN  HOUSE

planning  group  to  actively  engage  the  public  in  planning  for  the  

area.    The  meeting  was  attended  by  three  people-­  one  member  of  the  general  public  and  two  local  business  owners.  The  informa-­tion  below  is  a  summary  of  activities  and  feedback  from  the  open  house.

Public  Open  House

St.  Josaphat  Basilica

Safety  concerns-­

Lincoln  intersection.  The  results  of  this  activity  conclude  that  par-­ticipants   feel   there  are  more  unsafe  areas   (13   total)   than  safe  

-­walks  or  in  the  park.    Of  the  unsafe  areas  indicated,  only  four  (4)  were  on  sidewalks  while  nine  (9)  were  in  the  road.  Generally,  turn  lanes  around  this  area  were  deemed  to  be  a  problem  both  for  au-­

One  issue  that  was  raised  is  the  speed  of  drivers  traveling  west-­

concerning  to   them  because  of  a  bottleneck  at   the   intersection  -­

to  accelerate  rapidly  and  speed  around  or  cut-­off  other  vehicles  in  the  main  travel  lane.

-­ment  and  semis.    Such  large  vehicles  on  a  narrow  4-­lane  street  can  cause  visibility  issues  for  vehicles  trying  to  pass  and  in  turn,  raises  pedestrian  safety  issues  with  being  unseen  and  speeding  vehicles.

Above:  The  Public  Open  House  

Above:  After  a  formal  presenta-­tion  by  the  planning  group,  meet-­ing  attendants  participated  in  a  hands  on  activity

Page 64: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 64

AestheticsThe  second  activity  of  the  open  house  asked  participants  to  “get  their  hands  dirty”  by  applying  various  streetscape  elements  and  infrastructure  improvements  to  planametric  illustrations  of  the  in-­tersection.    This  was  done  utilizing  cut-­outs  of  elements-­  bench-­es,  trees,  trash  receptacles,  pavers,  planters,  and  hanging  bas-­kets-­  and  markers  to  draw  other  elements-­  bike  racks,  public  art,  pavement  markings,  sidewalk  extensions,  signage,  and  banners.  Each  element  was  designated  a  certain  point  value  based  on  the  unit  and  installation  cost.    Participants  were  allowed  an  unlimited  budget  for  placing  these  items  where  they  felt  appropriate.

The   result   of   this   activ-­-­

provements  are  more   than  welcomed   in   order   for   the  intersection   to  be  “dressed  up   a   bit”.   New   items   like  planters,   hanging   baskets,  and   trees   were   placed   on  the  site  in  an  effort  to  make  the  aesthetic  appearance  of  the  intersection  more  inter-­esting  and   inviting.  Partici-­pants  also  indicated  that  in-­frastructure   improvements  like   curb-­bump   outs   and  new  pavers,   instead   of   re-­painting   crosswalks,   would  

-­trian  right-­of-­way.  However,

these   improvements,   they   argued,   would   not   be   welcomed   at  the  expense  of  on-­street  parking  spaces.    Other  maintenance  is-­sues  like  trash  pick-­up  and  repairs  to  road  surfaces  were  desired.    Participants  mentioned  the  wish  for  more  aesthetically  appealing  trash  receptacles  to  connect  any  streetscape  improvements.

Because  speed  of  drivers  was  a  “hot  topic”,  it  was  asked  if  par-­

the  street  more  quickly  instead  of  crossing  at  the  corner.    Both  business  owners  replied  “not  really”,  and  felt   the  situation  with  speeding  and  pedestrians  was  a  combination  of  driver  careless-­

makes  it  more  unsafe  for  both  parties.

Top:  Meeting  attendees  partici-­pate  in  placing  streetscaping  ele-­ments  on  6th  and  Lincoln  maps

Above:  Three  planning  group  members  listen  intently  as  com-­munity  stakeholders  discuss  some  issues  with  the  intersection  of  6th  and  Lincoln.

Page 65: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE65

-­cause  of  the  presence  of  the  Basilica,  focus  of  drivers  is  up  in  the  

at  a  high  rate  of  speed,  and  there  are  a  limited  number  of  visual  or  physical  barriers  to  reduce  this  speed,  the  intersection  not  only  felt  unsafe,  but  was  unsafe.    This  participant  felt  it  was  important  

was  suggested  by  the  participant  that  adding  improvements  such  as  lighted  crosswalks  to  focus  driver  attention  on  pedestrians  and  not  the  Basilica  would  help  pedestrians  feel  more  safe  and  slow  

Image  preferencesFinally,  participants  had  the  opportunity  to  indicate  their  prefer-­ence  of  various  streetscaping  and   infrastructure   improvements.    This  was  done  through  an  image  preference  survey.    While  there  was   a   limited   number   of   participants,   a   few   results   stood   out.    In   the  vegetation/tree  board,  all   three   stickers  were  placed  on  the  photo  which  had  a  full  planter  bed  with  trees  and  pavers  on  

photo  with  lights  at  night  to  indicate  the  presence  of  a  pedestrian.    The  other  boards  had  split  results  with  each  participant  voting  for  a  different  image.

Additional  Participant  CommentsPresentation  was  well  prepared  and  informative

boards  from  the  open  house.    The  other  subjects  were  pedes-­trian  signage,  curb  bump-­outs  and  activation/use  of  sidewalk  right-­of-­way.

Page 66: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 66

hands-­on  participant  activity  show  where  there  are  safe  and  unsafe  areas  within  the  intersec-­tion  and  surrounding  context.

The  yellow  stars  indicate  safe  areas

The  red  stars  indicate  unsafe  areas

Above:  A  participant  places  stars  on  what  he  believes  are  safe  and  unsafe  areas  at  6th  St.  and  Lin-­coln  Ave.

Page 67: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE67

Left:  The  results  of  the  second  hands-­on  pedestrian  exercise  revealed  the  desire  for  many  aesthetic  and  physical  changes  to  the  pedestrian  realm  and  infra-­structure.

Above:  A  participant  places  street  elements  on  his  board  while  a  Planning  Group  member  observes

Page 68: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 68

RECOMMENDATIONS

around   creating   a  more   aesthetically   pleasing   pedestrian   envi-­ronment  and  education.  By  refocusing  on   the  pedestrian  realm  -­  through  the  addition  of  benches,  hanging  baskets,  walk  timers,  curb  bump  outs-­  pedestrians  will  feel  safer.    These  improvements  will  also  serve  to  make  drivers  more  aware  of  “the  street”  as  a  shared  space  instead  of  a  thoroughfare.

Special  focus  should  also  be  given  to  the  idea  of  view  corridors  and  vertical  elements.  Because  of  the  presence  of  St.  Josaphat  Basilica  drivers  are  more  likely  to  be  focused  up  at  the  impres-­sive  structure,  rather  than  at  pedestrian  level.  Improvements  like  crosswalk  lighting  and  more  frequent  maintenance  of  road  lines  will  help  return  attention  to  the  road  and  at  not  the  Basilica.    It  may  even  prompt  more  drivers  to  park  and  walk  to  see  the  Ba-­

Project

and  Lincoln  intersection.    To  begin,  speed  plays  a   large   factor   in   pedestrian   safety.     Best   Prac-­tice  Management  (BPM)  project  case  study   two  (2)  aids  in  reducing  pedestrian  crashes  by  imple-­menting   curb-­cuts   and   on-­street   parking,   nar-­rowing  the  street  width.    Both  case  studies  one  (1)  and  three  (3)  also  deal  with  pedestrian  safety  and  are  methods  of  reducing  pedestrian  crashes  at  the  intersection  by  introducing  better  signage  

signs  and  an   increase   in   the   time   in  which   the  

-­ans  pathways  more  visible  will  reduce  pedestrian  

intersection,  “Complete  Streets”   is  an   ideal   for-­mat   for  all  modes  of   transportation.    BPM  case  

to  reduce  pedestrian  crashes  by  overhauling  the  facilities  and  beautifying  the  area  by  implement-­ing  vegetation  as  a  buffer  between  the  sidewalk  and  the  road.

Below:  This  image  is  a  render-­ing  of  what  the  6th  and  Lincoln  intersection  could  look  like  if  the  project  recommendations  were  implemented.

Page 69: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE69

ProgramDriver  education

both  the  speed  and  recklessness  of  drivers.    

around  the  education  of  drivers  will  help  de-­ter  this  behavior.

Businesses   in  the  area  provide  a  great  av-­enue  to  reach  out  to  drivers  about  slowing  down  and   the  need   to   be   attentive.     Pub-­

pamphlets  would  be  developed  and  handed  out   to   drivers.     These  materials   would   be  dispersed  through  the  businesses  by  giving  each  customer  one  when  they  visit  a  store.    

opportunity  to  reach  a  large  number  of  visi-­tors.    Lastly,  these  informational  items  could  be  placed  on  parked  automobiles  in  the  area  on  a  weekly  basis.  

Education  in  nearby  schoolsThere  are  a  number  of  schools  within  close  proximity  to  the  intersection.    Developing  a  few  lesson  plans  pertaining  to  different  pe-­destrian  issues  should  be  developed  for  each  grade  level.      The    information    would  stressthe  importance  of  safe  pedestrian  habits  and  the  need  to  be  at-­

was  a  higher  and  longer  retention  rate  of  safe  habits  versus  those  done  individually  or  by  teacher.

PolicyMore  frequent  maintenance

issues  with  the  currently  worn  out  pavement  markings.    It  is  rec-­ommended  that  there  is  a  developed  plan  to  ensure  a  consistent  rotating   basis   of   when   the   pavement   markings   are   repainted.    From  discussions,  it  was  clear  that  the  worn  out  markings  have  caused  confusion  on  the  part  of  drivers  who  then  drive  recklessly  once  they  realize  they  are  in  the  wrong  lane.

Above:  This  image  is  a  render-­ing  of  what  the  6th  and  Lincoln  intersection  could  look  like  if  the  project  recommendations  were  implemented.

Page 70: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 70

A

B

C

This  page  contains  before  and  after  photomontage  renderings  of  existing  conditions  and  pedestri-­an  streetscaping  improvements.    The  improvements  include  the  Planning  Group’s  recommenda-­tions  for  project  improvements  based  on  case  study  research  and  public  input.

Read  as  A:A  =  before:after,  etc.

A:  6th  Street  looking  south

B:  Looking  northeast  from  the  steps  of  St.Josaphat  Basilica

C:  Lincoln  Avenue  looking  east

Page 71: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

TARGET  AREAS    AREA  B:  6TH  STREET  AND  LINCOLN  AVENUE71

A

B

C

Page 72: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 73: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

CITY  WIDE  RECOMMENDATIONS73

CITY  OF  MILWAUKEEThe  City  of  Milwaukee  has  an  opportunity  to  improve  on  its  pe-­destrian  infrastructure  through  education  and  a  comprehensive,  complete  streets  approach.    By  introducing  the  street  as  a  shared  space,  or  a  “complete  street”,  Milwaukee  can  better  serve  the  pe-­destrian  and  motorist.    This  approach  will  create  safe,  enjoyable  walking  routes  which  encourage  people  to  walk  and  capitalize  on  unique,  local  experiences  and  partnerships.    It  will  also  encourage  safer  driving  habits  and  enhance  multi-­modalism  in  transporta-­tion.    However,   a   transition   to   a  more  walkable  Milwaukee  will  take  public  outreach,  education,  and  good  implementation.

ProjectThe   base   framework   for   a   City   of   Milwaukee   Pedestrian   Plan,  implemented  city  wide,  must  begin  with   the   idea  of   “Complete  Streets”.    Making  the  pedestrians  visible  by  decreasing  the  time  frame  for  which  crosswalks  are  repainted,  adding   lighting,  or  a  change  in  material  will  greatly  reduce  the  number  of  pedestrian  

as  signage  will  contribute  to  the  reduction  of  pedestrian  crashes,  

by  making  the  drivers  more  aware  of  their  surroundings  and,  al-­low  for  an  increase  in  reaction  time  if  a  pedestrian  were  to  walk  into  the  path  of  an  oncoming  vehicle.

ProgramSafety  training  sessionsIt  is  recommended  the  City  develop  pedestrian  training  sessions  to  be  presented  to  the  public.    These  would  be  sessions  in  which  

These  sessions  could  either  be  taught  by  themselves  or  as  part  of  other  outreach  events  put  on  by  the  Milwaukee  Police  Depart-­

be  stationed  around  busy  intersections  during  events,  engaging  pedestrians  in  conversations  about  safe  habits.    These  sessions  

other  community  outreach  events.

PSA  pamphlets  and  postersThe  development  of  public  service  announcement  pamphlets  and  posters  is  a  recommendation  as  a  city-­wide  project.    Pamphlets  would  be  small,  1/3  sheets  of  paper  the  would  have  diagrams  and  

be  created  to  discuss  the  need  for  drivers  to  be  attentive  to  ped-­

CITY  WIDE  RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 74: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 74

during   the  educational   sessions.    Driver  educational  pamphlets  can  easily  be  placed  on  automobiles  during  large  events.  

In  addition  to  these  two  types  of  pamphlets,  safe  pedestrian  hab-­its  can  be   incorporated   into   the  material  passed  out   to  visitors  

also  be  taught  safe  habits  and  how  they  can  engage  visitors  to  discuss  this  information  when  they  are  helping  individuals.

Lastly,  the  information  in  the  pamphlets  should  also  be  developed  -­

dows  and  at  bus  shelters.    Bus  shelters  provide  a  great  opportu-­nity  for  people  to  read  the  information  while  they  are  waiting  for  the  bus.    Moreover,  a  poster  should  be  developed  for  placement  on  the  bus.

Walk  There!  Challenge-­-­

lar  challenge  takes  place  in  Milwaukee.    This  challenge  could  in-­clude  city  employees  and  the  rest  of  the  downtown  businesses.    It  would  be  important  for  each  participant  to  track  the  number  of  steps  walked  each  day  to  reach  a  combined  goal  of  all  participants  

kicked-­off  with  a  large  event,  perhaps  the  walking  of  the  Milwau-­kee  Riverwalk  and  ended  in  a  similar  fashion.    Moreover,  it  should  coincide  with  a  “walk  to  work  week”  challenge,  formulated  around  “bike  to  work  week.”

PolicyK-­12  curriculum  for  MPSThe  City  of  Milwaukee  should  work  with  Milwaukee  Public  Schools  to   develop   a   consistent,   across-­the-­board   curriculum   revolving  around  safe  pedestrian  habits.  These  lessons  would  be  developed  to  ensure  that  teachers  are   in  fact  teaching  the  subject  to  stu-­dents  and  that  the  information  is  correct  and  consistent  city-­wide.    Lesson  plans  would  be  developed  for  each  grade  level  and  tailored  in  such  a  way  as  to  be  the  most  effective  for  that  age  group.    In  Orange  County,  Florida  the  information  was  presented  differently  for  different  grades.    For  younger  kids  an  active  teaching  envi-­ronment  was  used  while  a  more  passive,  in  the  form  of  posters  around  the  school,  was  used  for  high  schools.    Miami-­Dade  Coun-­ty  was  able  to  see  a  decline  in  the  number  of  pedestrian  crashes  for  students  under  the  age  of  14  with  just  four  weeks  of  half-­hour  lesson  plans  once  a  week.

Page 75: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

CITY  WIDE  RECOMMENDATIONS75

Pedestrian  travel  policyThis   policy   would   create   design   guidelines   that   would   need   to  be  followed  anytime  construction  on  a  street  occurs.    This  policy  would   ensure   that  when   construction   happens,   pedestrian   ele-­ments  are  included  and  are  done  in  such  a  way  to  be  accessible  to  all  pedestrians  of  the  street.    The  State  of  Kentucky  implemented  this  policy  and  has  concluded  that  not  only  has  pedestrian  safety  increased,  so  have  other  forms  of  non-­motorized  transportation.

Neighborhood  residents  are  the  best  at  recognizing  pedestrian  is-­

be  setup  to  develop  an  avenue  for  local  residents  to  get  the  sig-­nage   needed   for   the   neighborhood.   The  City   should  work  with  neighborhood  associations  in  not  only  identifying  where  signage  is  needed,  but  also  with  the  funding.    The  neighborhood  associa-­tion  would  raise  funds  to  help  subsidize  the  cost  of  the  signage  it  

and  installment  of  the  signs  neighbors  feel  are  needed.

laws  are  convoluted,  resulting  in  infrequent  or  incorrect  enforce-­ment.    The  Milwaukee  Police  Department  should  either  develop  a  

about  safe  habits  and  ordinances  pertaining  to  pedestrians  when  they  see  a  violation  occur.

The  City  of  Madison,  Wisconsin  created  a  video  series  for  their  po-­lice  department  and  it  was  seen  as  a  huge  success.    These  were  so  helpful  that  the  videos  were  then  edited  to  create  a  message  for  the  education  of  the  public  at  outreach  events  and  in  schools.

Page 76: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 76

OTHER  CONSIDERATIONSThese  ideas  provide  some  preliminary  brainstorming  ideas  which  the  City  of  Milwaukee  might  consider  in  generating  new  alterna-­

New  IdeasFun  theoryMaking  things  fun  makes  people  want  to  do  them.    If  you  make  walking  fun,  by  whatever  means,  people  will  want  to  do  it.    One  

-­sponsible  for  administering  jaywalking  tickets  to  offenders.    The  

a  predetermined  number  of   those  people  who   follow   the   rules.    Ultimately,  the  money  generated  from  jaywalkers  would  be  dis-­tributed  to  those  that  follow  the  rules.    See  www.thefuntheory.com,  “The  Speed  Camera  Lottery”  as  an  example.

Walk  to  work  dayOnce  a  year  provide   incentives   for  businesses  and  government  departments   to  encourage  walking   to  work.   This   voluntary  ap-­proach  would  help  promote  a  healthier  lifestyle  and  increase  the  social  capitol  of  the  area  in  which  it  is  implemented.  Since  2004,  cities  across  the  nation  have  participated  in  National  Walk  to  Work  Day

Walking  weekendClose  a  neighborhood   to  walking  only   for   a  weekend  or   Friday  work  day.     Public   transportation   should  be  allowed   to   continue  its   usual   routes.     This   idea   allows   for   more   social   interaction,  increase   safety,   compliment   a   community   event,   promote   a  healthier  lifestyle,  and  generate  support  for  walking  as  a  realistic    

Riverwest,  Bay  View,  and  Lincoln  Village  might  be  some  areas  of  consideration  for  implementation.    Sheboygan  County,  Wisconsin  

Bike  and  Walk  to  Work  Week   in  June  of  2011.    See  http://www.co.sheboygan.wi.us/bwtww/  for  more  details.

Existing  PolicyMilwaukee  Public  Schools  (MPS)  Busing  PolicyWork  with  MPS  to  reduce  the  number  of  students  bused,  there-­by   increasing   the  number  of   students  walking   to  neighborhood  schools.    Use  the  money  saved  in  busing  costs  to  provide  better  or  equal  services  at  all  neighborhood  schools  so  demand  for  bus-­ing  to  schools  with  better  choices  is  mitigated.

Page 77: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 78: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 79: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

APPENDIX79

RESOURCESCity  of  Denver  Pedestrian  Master  Planhttp://www.denvergov.org/TabId/395511/default.aspx

City  of  Seattle  Pedestrian  Master  Planhttp://www.seattle.gov/transportation/pedestrian_masterplan/

Complete  Streets  Resource  Toolkit

Federal  Highway  Administration  Safety:  A  Resident’s  Guide  for  Creating  Safe  and  Walkable  Communitieshttp://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/ped_cmnity/ped_walk-­guide/suc_stories.cfm

Pedestrian  and  Bicycle  Information  Center:  Compendium,  July  2010http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/

Pedestrian  and  Bicycle  Information  Center:  Image  Libraryhttp://www.pedbikeimages.org/

Pedestrian  and  Bicycle  Information  Center:  Walking  Infohttp://www.walkinginfo.org/

National  Complete  Streets  Coalitionhttp://www.completestreets.org/changing-­policy/policy-­ele-­ments/

Walk  Scorehttp://www.walkscore.com/

APPENDIX

Page 80: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning

PEDESTRIAN  PLANNING:  MILWAUKEEBEST  PRACTICE’S  FOR  PEDESTRIAN  POLICIES,  PROGRAMS,  AND  PROJECTS 80

6TH  AND  LINCOLN  NEIGHBORHOOD/BUSINESS  CONTACTS

David  AriasEl  Salvador  Restaurant

Luis  Barbosa

Chris  or  Nara  Colton

414.383.3400

Rick  Petrie

414.271.9417

John  RozgaOwner/OperatorRozga  Funeral  Home

[email protected]

Jim  TarantinoCommittee  Coordinator

Maria  VargasDivas  Hair  Salon

414.899.7895

Brad  ZwiegOwner/Operator

Page 81: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning
Page 82: Milwaukee Pedestrian Planning