milwaukee urban atlas population characteristics · milwaukee urban atlas page 8 of 146 march, 2003...
TRANSCRIPT
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 7 of 146 March, 2003
Population Characteristics
Metropolitan Population The City of Milwaukee’s population declined by five percent (31,114 persons) between 1990 and 2000. This compares with a loss of just two percent between 1980 and 1990, and an eleven percent loss between 1970 and 1980. During the 1970 to 2000 period, the metropolitan population increased by about 100,000 persons. Nearly all of that growth took place outside Milwaukee County as Table 1 shows.
Each of the three suburban counties experienced significant growth. In 2000 the population of Waukesha County exceeded the population of suburban Milwaukee County for the first time. Some suburban growth was probably due to the movement of persons from the City of Milwaukee to the suburbs. Currently available census data isn’t detailed enough to estimate how much suburban growth occurred because persons moved from the City. Census data does tell us that the cities of Milwaukee and Waukesha traded about 2,000 persons between 1995 and 2000. Approximately 30,000 persons moved into the City of Milwaukee from the suburban parts of the metro area, not including the city of Waukesha. Just over 20,000 of those persons lived in suburban Milwaukee County in 1995. About 75,000 persons moved to the suburban part of the metro area from Milwaukee or Waukesha. It’s likely the many of those movers lived in the City of Milwaukee in 1995.
County Population Percent Population Percent Population Percent Population Percent
Milwaukee 1,054,249 75.1% 964,988 69.1% 959,275 67.0% 940,164 62.6% City of Milwaukee 717,372 68.0% 636,295 65.9% 628,088 65.5% 596,974 63.5% Suburbs 336,877 32.0% 328,693 34.1% 331,187 34.5% 343,190 36.5%Ozaukee 54,421 3.9% 66,981 4.8% 72,831 5.1% 82,317 5.5%Washington 63,839 4.5% 84,848 6.1% 95,328 6.7% 117,493 7.8%Waukesha 231,365 16.5% 280,326 20.1% 304,715 21.3% 360,767 24.0%
Total 1,403,874 100.0% 1,397,143 100.0% 1,432,149 100.0% 1,500,741 100.0%
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census
Total PopulationMilwaukee Metropolitan Area
1970 to 2000
1970 1980 1990 2000
Table 1
Milwaukee Metro Area Population
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Num
ber o
f Per
sons
City Milw Co subs Ozaukee Washington Waukesha
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 8 of 146 March, 2003
Net migration can be estimated using recent census data with births and deaths occurring to area residents between censuses. As Table 2 shows, approximately 92,000 more persons moved out of the City than into it during the 1990s. There was less out migration during the 1980s, but more during the 1970s. Milwaukee’s manufacturing economy suffered during the 1980s, perhaps making it difficult for households to move to more expensive housing in the suburbs. The remainder of Milwaukee County experienced net in migration for the first time since the 1960s during the 1990s. The three suburban counties experienced net in migration through out the period. .
City of Milwaukee Population Although the City lost five percent of its 1990 population, some parts of the City experienced gains. Map 1 shows 1990 to 2000 population change by census tract. The area south of the Valley and west of I-94 and the north side between Lisbon and Fond du Lac experienced gains as younger families replaced older households. The lower east side and the downtown had gains because of new housing units. Some tracts near the City limits had population increases because of new construction. Central city tracts recorded losses due to housing unit demolition. Tracts nearer the City limits that lost population did so because households became smaller as residents aged. Milwaukee’s east side along with parts of the central city are the most densely populated as shown by Map 2. The east side and the area west of downtown have mostly multifamily buildings. Other tracts with relatively high population density are developed with single family and
Rest of ThreeCity of Milwaukee Suburban Total
Milwaukee County Counties Area
1970 population 717,372 336,877 349,625 1,403,874 1970 to 1980 natural growth 48,564 12,226 29,972 90,762 1970 to 1980 estimated net migration -129,724 -20,325 52,556 -97,493
1980 population 636,212 328,778 432,153 1,397,143 1980 to 1990 natural growth 59,098 9,225 32,965 101,288 1980 to 1990 estimated net migration -67,222 -6,816 7,756 -66,282
1990 population 628,088 331,187 472,874 1,432,149 1990 to 20000 natural growth 60,554 3,597 29,700 93,851 1990 to 2000 estimated net migration -91,668 8,406 58,003 -25,259
2000 population 596,974 343,190 560,577 1,500,741
Natural growth is the total number of births to area residents minus the number of area residents who died between censuses.Estimated net migration is the difference between the 1970 population plus 1970 to 1980 natural growth and the 1980 census population. Same method used for 1980 to 1990 and 1990 to 2000 estimates
Source: U. S. Bureau of the Census, Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services.
Milwaukee Metropolitan Area1960 to 2000
Table 2
Natural Growth and Net Migration
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 9 of 146 March, 2003
duplex buildings on small urban lots in areas that include little non residential development. The high density tracts on the south side also had recent population increases.
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 10 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
124 t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
76th
60th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
6 8t h
35th
4 3rd
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
ell
6th
13th
20th
27th
Cle
men
t
Villard
Silver Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Morgan
Boliv ar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Change in Population, 1990 to 2000City Change = decrease 5.0% -- Source: US Bureau of the Census
increase 5.0% or moreincrease 2.5% to 4.9%increase less than 2.5%decrease less than 2.5%decrease 2.5% to 4.9%decrease 5.0% to 9.9%decrease 10.0% to 19.9%decrease 20.0% or more
Map 1 – Change in Population 1990 to 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 11 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
124 t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
7 6th
6 0th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
68t h
35th
4 3rd
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
e ll
6th
1 3th
20t h
27th
Cle
men
t
Villard
Silv er Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Morgan
Boliv ar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Persons Per Square Mile, 2000City Average = 6,222 -- Source: PL94-17 data
17,500 to 29,50012,000 to 17,499
9,000 to 11,0006,500 to 8,9994,000 to 6,499
less than 4,000
Map 2 – Persons per Square Mile, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 12 of 146 March, 2003
Race, Hispanic Origin Milwaukee became a minority majority city during the 1990s. The Milwaukee metropolitan area continues to be segregated. Forty percent of the metropolitan population lives in the City: 85 percent of the area’s minorities live in the City. Fully 95 percent of the area’s African Americans, 75 percent of the area’s Hispanics, but only about 60 percent of the other racial minorities live in the City. Table 3 summarizes the racial and Hispanic characteristics of the City’s population. The data for 2000 is not comparable with previous censuses because persons were permitted to indicate more than one race in 2000. About two percent of the City’s population indicated more than one race.
Each of the minority groups increased during the 1990s except American Indians. Maps 3, 4, 5, and 6 show the percentage of Hispanic, African American, American Indian, and Asian-Pacific Islanders by census tract respectively. (Note the same color represents different numeric categories on each map.) The maps show that each group is concentrated in different locations in Milwaukee. The area west of downtown is the only area that has a mix of racial and Hispanic persons.
Race, Hispanic Population Percent Population Percent Population Percent
Hispanic 26,487 4.2% 39,409 6.3% 71,646 12.0%
Not Hispanic 609,725 95.8% 588,679 93.7% 525,328 88.0% White 453,970 71.4% 381,714 60.8% 270,989 45.4% African American 145,850 22.9% 189,408 30.2% 220,432 36.9% American Indian 4,859 0.8% 5,213 0.8% 4,313 0.7% Asian or Pacific Islander 4,239 0.7% 11,429 1.8% 17,561 2.9% Other race 807 0.1% 915 0.1% 978 0.2% Two or more races* 11,055 2.1%
Total 636,212 100.0% 628,088 100.0% 596,974 100.0%*2000 census onlySource: 1980, 1990, 2000 census
1980 1990 2000
Table 3
Population by Race and Hispanic OriginCity of Milwaukee
1980 to 2000
Race and Hispanic
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
White Black Am Indian Asian Other Two+ Race Hispanic
Pers
ons 1980 1990 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 13 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
1 24 t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
76th
60th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
68th
35th
4 3rd
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
e ll
6th
13th
20t h
27th
Cle
men
t
Villard
Silver Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Morgan
Boliv ar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Percent Population Hispanic of Any Race: 2000City Average = 12.0% -- Source: PL94-171 data
50.0% to 78.9%25.0% to 49.9%10.0% to 24.9%
5.0% to 9.9%2.5% to 4.9%
less than 2.5%
Map 3 – Percent Population Hispanic, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 14 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
124 t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
76th
6 0th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
6 8th
35th
4 3rd
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
ell
6 th
1 3th
20th
27th
Cl e
men
t
Villard
Silver Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Morgan
Boliv ar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Percent of Population Single Race African American: 2000City Average = 37.3% -- Source: PL94-171 data
75% or more50.0% to 74.9%25.0% to 49.9%15.0% to 24.9%5.0% to 14.9%
less than 5.0%
Map 4 – Percent Population African American, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 15 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
124t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
7 6th
60th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
6 8t h
35th
4 3rd
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
ell
6th
13t h
20th
27th
Cle
men
t
Villard
Silver Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Morgan
Bolivar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Percent of Population Single Race American Indian: 2000City Average = 0.8% -- Source: PL94-171 data
2.5% to 5.1%1.0% to 2.4%0.5% to 0.9%less than 0.5%
Map 5 – Percent Population American Indian, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 16 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
1 24t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
76th
6 0th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
68th
35th
43rd
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
ell
6th
1 3th
20th
27th
Cle
men
t
Villard
Silver Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Morgan
Boliv ar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Percent of Population Single Race Asian and Pacif ic Islander: 2000City Average = 3.0% -- Source: PL94-171 data
15.0% to 27.6%5.0% to 14.9%3.0% to 4.9%1.5% to 2.9%
less than 1.5%
Map 6 – Percent Population Asian or Pacific Islander, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 17 of 146 March, 2003
Some minority residents were foreign born. Nearly eight percent of the City’s 2000 population was foreign born. About 24,300 were born in Latin America; 12,100 were born in Asia. This implies that one-third of the City’s Hispanics and almost seventy percent of the City’s Asians were born outside the United States. Both groups may have difficulty speaking English and adjusting to a different culture.
Sex Just under half of the City’s residents were males, 47.8%. The percentage male varied by racial group. African Americans had the lowest percentage male, Hispanics the highest. The percentage may be lower among African Americans because African American males are more likely to be under counted by the census. City white residents were older than other racial groups; older residents are more likely to be females. Asians and Hispanic groups included recent immigrants. Males will often immigrate prior the rest of the family. Map 7 indicates the percentage of males. Area nearest the downtown, along the Milwaukee River and on the south side including and surrounding Walker’s Point had the highest ratio of males to females. The south side includes Hispanic persons. The downtown and River areas are predominately white, however.
Percent Population Male by Race, 2000
40.0%
42.0%
44.0%
46.0%
48.0%
50.0%
52.0%
54.0%
White African Amer Amer Indian Asian Hispanic Total
Race
Perc
ent
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 18 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
124 t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
7 6t h
60th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
68th
35th
43r d
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
ell
6 th
13th
20t h
27th
Cle
men
t
Villard
Silv er Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Morgan
Boliv ar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Percent Population Male, 2000City Average = 47.8% -- Source: 2000 Census File SF1
less than 45.0%45.0% to 46.9%47.0% to 48.9%49.0% to 50.9%51.0% or m ore
Map 7 – Percent Population Male, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 19 of 146 March, 2003
Age Milwaukee’s median age increased slightly between 1990 and 2000, from 30.3 years to 30.6 years. This increase was much smaller than the one observed during the 1980s. Map 8 shows median age by census tract in 2000. Median ages were lowest in the tracts that surround the central part of the City, several northwest side tracts, and the tracts surrounding the universities. The majority of persons living near the universities are in the 18 to 24 year age group, there are more children living in the remaining areas with low median ages.
The number of persons increased in the 5 to 17 and the 35 to 54 year age groups despite an over all decrease in population. Table 4 indicates the number of persons in each age group since 1980. The big increase in the 45 to 54 year age group is due to the aging of persons born during the post World War II baby boom. Fewer persons were born during World War II and the depression that preceded it, hence the decline of persons in the 55 to 64 age group. The decline in persons in this age group and the older age groups implies less demand for housing units designed for elderly persons over the next ten years. There could be more demand for amenities that permit older persons to age in their existing units, however.
Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
under 5 49,771 7.8% 54,276 8.6% 47,545 8.0%5 to 17 122,095 19.2% 117,864 18.8% 123,439 20.7%18 to 24 97,657 15.3% 76,602 12.2% 72,849 12.2%25 to 34 110,922 17.4% 119,072 19.0% 94,451 15.8%35 to 44 56,218 8.8% 84,407 13.4% 85,792 14.4%45 to 54 59,058 9.3% 49,499 7.9% 68,351 11.4%55 to 64 61,169 9.6% 48,223 7.7% 39,424 6.6%65 and older 79,322 12.5% 78,145 12.4% 65,123 10.9%
Total 636,212 100.0% 628,088 100.0% 596,974 100.0%
Median age 28.7 30.3 30.6
Table 4
1980 1990 2000
Population by AgeCity of Milwaukee
1980 to 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 20 of 146 March, 2003
Burleigh
Keef e
Capitol
Congress
Hampton
Villard
Walnut
North
Center
Howard
Morgan
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Lincoln
College
124t
h
Ramsey
Silv er Spring
Florist
Mill
Grange
Edgerton
Lay ton
Cold Spring
Burnham
Greenf ield
Schlinger
Fairv iew
Wisconsin
Juneau
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
Bradley
Dean
Brown Deer
Fairy Chasm
County Line 91st
107t
h
1 24t
h
84th
92nd
108t
h
7 6t h
60th
68th
Brown Deer
Dean
Fairy Chasm
County Line76th
68th
35th
4 3r d
51st
Mill
Florist
Bradley
Green Tree
Good Hope
Calumet
How
e ll
6th
1 3th
20t h
27th
Cl e
me n
t
Villard
Silver Spring
Hampton
Congress
Capitol
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Lincoln
Burnham
Lay ton
Grange
College
Howard
Oklahoma
Clev eland
Morgan
Boliv ar
Edgewood
Kenwood
Park
North
Brady
Juneau
Median Age, 2000City Median = 30.6 -- Source: 2000 Census File SF1
16.8 to 24.9 years25.0 to 29.9 years30.0 to 34.9 years35.0 to 39.9 years40.0 to 55.3 years
Map 8 – Median Age, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 21 of 146 March, 2003
Map 9 shows the number of persons 65 and older in 2000. Most older residents lived nearest the City limits. The few central city tracts with higher percentages have developments designed for elderly residents. Milwaukee’s minority residents were less likely to be elderly than its white residents. The graph shows that the majority of children in the City belongrf to a minority group. White residents formed the majority of the City’s older residents. Map 10 shows the change in the percent of population 65 and older between 1990 and 2000. The largest increases were in areas nearest the City limits. These areas were developed during the 1960s and 1970s. Many of the tracts with decreases in older residents saw a turnover to younger families during the 1990s. Those tracts that experienced an increase in older residents are likely to experience a similar turnover in the next ten or 15 years. For the first time an aging of African American residents is shown by the area to the north of the central part of Milwaukee.
Population by Age by Minority Status
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
under 10 10 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 69 70 to 79 80 over
Age
Pers
ons
White Minority
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 22 of 146 March, 2003
Park
Brady
Edgew ood
Kenw ood
North
Juneau
Lincoln
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Layton
Bolivar
Morgan
How ard
Grange
College
Clem
ent
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenfield
Burnham
Congress
Capitol
Hampton
6th
How
ell
Florist
Villard
Silver Spring
Good Hope
Green Tree
Calumet
Bradley
13th
20th
27th
35th
Mill
43rd
60th
68th
Fairy Chasm
68th
Dean
Brow n Deer
County Line
92nd
7 6th
84th
Bradley12
4th
91s t
County Line
Dean
Brow n Deer
Fairy Chasm
College
Ramsey
Grange
124t
h
Cold Spring
How ard
Edgerton
Layton
Morgan
Good Hope
Villard
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Green Tree
Calumet
Hampton
Burnham
Greenf ield
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Lincoln
Schlinger
Walnut
North
Fairview
Wisconsin
Juneau
Center
Burleigh
Keefe
Capitol
Congress
Percent Population 65 Years or Older, 2000City Average = 10.9% -- Source: 2000 Census File SF1
less than 5.0%5.0% to 7.4%7.5% to 9.9%
10.0% to 14.9%15.0% to 20.0%20.0% to 34.4%
Map 9 – Percent Persons 65 or Older, 2000
Milwaukee Urban Atlas
Page 23 of 146 March, 2003
Park
Brady
Edgew ood
Kenw ood
North
Juneau
Lincoln
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Layton
Bolivar
Morgan
How ard
Grange
College
Clem
ent
Wisconsin
Pierce
Greenf ield
Burnham
Congress
Capitol
Hampton
6th
How
e ll
Florist
Villard
Silver Spring
Good Hope
Green Tree
Calumet
Bradley
13th
20th
27th
35th
Mill
43rd
6 0th
68th
Fairy Chasm
68th
Dean
Brow n Deer
County Line
92nd
7 6t h
84th
Bradley12
4th
9 1s t
County Line
Dean
Brow n Deer
Fairy Chasm
College
Ramsey
Grange
124t
h
Cold Spring
How ard
Edgerton
Layton
Morgan
Good Hope
Villard
Silver Spring
Florist
Mill
Green Tree
Calumet
Hampton
Burnham
Greenf ield
Oklahoma
Cleveland
Lincoln
Schlinger
Walnut
North
Fairview
Wisconsin
Juneau
Center
Burleigh
Keefe
Capitol
Congress
Change in Percent Population 65 or Older, 1990 to 2000City Average = - 1.5% -- Source: 1990 File STF1A, 2000 File SF1
decrease 5.0% to 10.6%decrease 3.0% to 4.9%decrease 1.5% to 2.9%decrease less than 1.5%increase less than 2.0%increase 2.0% to 10.7%
Map 10 – Change in Percent Population 65 or Older, 1990 to 2000