ministry of finance, finland tuomo vainio 6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\1 performance-related...
TRANSCRIPT
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\1MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
PERFORMANCE-RELATED PAY IN THE STATE ADMINISTRATION IN FINLAND
ASSESSING PERFORMANCE-RELATED PAY POLICIESExpert Meeting
OECD, Paris7.10.2003
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\2MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
Public sector personnel in Finland
The state administration 123 000 persons, 4,9 milliard €
Municipalities and federations of municipalities 426 000 persons(schools, hospitals, etc.)
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\3MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
The State administration personnel by sub-sector 2001
29357
19613
11310 10453 10055 9301 9214
62064509 3449 2859
1629 1538
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
Univer
sity
educa
tion
Defen
ce F
orces
, Bord
er G
uard
Police,
resc
ue se
rvic
es
State
funds
man
agem
ent &
insu
rance
and fi
nanci
al s
ervi
ces
Resea
rch
Busines
s se
rvic
es
Admin
istra
tion o
f just
ice
Operat
ions
at M
inis
try le
vel
Regio
nal a
nd envi
ronm
enta
l ser
vice
s
Transp
ort an
d com
munic
atio
n and re
late
d ser
vice
s
Other
educa
tional
and tr
ainin
g ser
vice
s
Social
affa
irs a
nd em
ploym
ent s
ervi
ces
Other
oper
atio
ns
ParttimeFulltime
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\4MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS IN THE STATE SECTOR
Ministry of Finance/SEO
- The Government approves - The Finance Committee ofParliament approves additional costs
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS FORSTATE PERSONNEL
- expenditure framework- general employment terms- labour peace obligation
Central Statesector employeeorganisations
Employer Agencies
- Ministry of Financeapproves
- pay systems - flexible working hours- other agency-specific issues
Agency-levelemployee unions
Employers’ nationalcentral organisations,including StateEmployer’s Office (SEO)
INCOMES AND LABOUR-MARKET POLICY AGREEMENTS
Employeenational central organisations
Agency-specific collective agreements
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\5MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
Overview of the new remuneration system
Personal/performance pay
Job-related part of pay
Demand levels
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\6MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
The structure and the message of the new system
Result-Based
Reward
The result of the
unit or it’s part
Let’s do it together
(results, quality,
good service)
Personal/
performance part
Performance and possession of professional skills
Develop yourself, struggle to good results and good quality
Job-related
part of pay
Demands of the job Acquire and use professional skills, try to attain demanding jobs
Parts of the remuneration
Basis Message
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\7MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
Example of a NPS (without RBR)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
5,5
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Demand levels
Mo
nth
ly p
ay
- 10
00 €
Basic salaries Individual performance salaries
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\8MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4
Pe
r ce
nt Personnel
Agencies
Progress of the NPS Estimated by the Agencies in March 2003
Situationin March 2003
Estimate: inthe end of 2003
Estimate: inthe end of 2004
Target: in thebeginning of 2005
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\9MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
40
20
5
42
24
10
4
67
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Industry etc. Service etc. State Muncipalities
Pe
r ce
nt
of
pe
rso
nn
el
Sphere
Paid
Spheres of the RBR’s and paid RBR’s
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\10MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
Amounts of the RBR’s
4,4 4,4
2 2
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
Industry etc. Service etc. State Muncipalities
per
cen
t of t
he
ann
ual
sal
ary
6.10.2003 o:\pam\2003\kalvot\pariisi\11MINISTRY OF FINANCE, FINLANDTuomo Vainio
Experiences of the NPS
All phases in the building process of the NPS are important and have positive repercussions (e.g. surveying the real content of each job)
Management by objectives becomes concrete reality with the NPS
Leadership possibilities and skills improve Personnel find the NPS more justified because
pay differentiation is motivated by the accepted criterias