minnesota telecommunications background
DESCRIPTION
Presented by Steve Kelley to the Minnesota Broadband Task Force on Oct 24, 2008. A nice overview of telecommunications policy since the 1980’s.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Center for Science, Technology
& Public Policy
Humphrey Institute
of Public Affairs
Steve KelleySenior Fellow and DirectorCenter for Science, Technology and Public Policy University of [email protected]/centers/stpp/index.html
![Page 2: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
The Center’s Mission
To improve people’s lives by advancing the application of science and technology to solve public problems.
![Page 3: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Telephone Regulation
• Federal (interstate) and state (intrastate)
• Regulated monopoly until 1980s
• Price, QoS and availability regulation– Alternative regulation– Universal service, duty to serve– Common carrier
• Sales tax and assessments for universal service and public safety
![Page 4: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Regulation Varies by Acronym
• Incumbent local exchange company ILEC
• Regional Bell Operating Company RBOC – Qwest is an ILEC
• Large providers (50,000 access lines)
• Small providers, mostly rural, have less regulation
• Small private, cooperative and municipally owned
![Page 5: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Minnesota is Diverse
![Page 6: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Universal Service
• Voice service available to everyone
• Common good arguments related to safety and economic development
• Federal universal service fund
• Explicit subsidies for low income and disabled customers
• Implicit (hidden) subsidies
![Page 7: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Telephone Cross Subsidies
• Long Distance to Local – Access Charges
• Metropolitan to Rural – Uniform price (Large carriers like Qwest)
• Business to Residential
• Universal Service Fund– High cost companies– Schools, libraries, and hospitals
![Page 8: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Payments to Government
• Sales and corporate income tax
• Property taxes
• Universal service fund contributions
• Minnesota cents/line charges – Lifeline services TAP $.07 and TAM $.06– Public safety $.65
![Page 9: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Wireless
• Cellular telephone– Primarily federal regulation– States have minimal business regulations;
cannot regulate price– Cities and counties have limited say on tower
location
• Less regulated wireless, e.g. WiFI
• 911 charge applicable
![Page 10: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Cable Television
• Federal, state and local regulation
• Minnesota uses a city-based model with some cities forming multi-city commissions
• Some states have adopted state level franchise models
• No price regulation
• No universal service or common carrier requirements; area served requirement
![Page 11: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Cable-City Relationships
• Cities issue franchises• Franchise fee payments of up to 5% of
gross revenue• QOS regulation by city or commission• Institutional networks• PEG and area served regulation• No legal monopoly; arguable monopolies
in fact
![Page 12: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
State Franchise Option
• Other states have adopted state level franchises
• Pushed by telcos
• Address franchise fee, PEG, and area served in various ways
• Proposed in Minnesota
• Study due this January
![Page 13: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Satellite TV and Internet
• Federal regulation
• Competes in part with cable
• Advantage in rural areas
• Sales tax
![Page 14: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Internet
• Federal regulation
• Information service
• No common carrier obligation
• Sales tax
• Certain schools, libraries and rural hospitals benefit from federal subsidy
• Service rules/Net neutrality
![Page 15: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
1996 Act
• Telecommunications service
• Cable service
• Information service, including electronic publishing
• Legacy definitions – 1980s or before
• ISPs are information services
• Providers now providing all three
![Page 16: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Non-discrimination
• Heritage of common carrier approach
• Applicable only to telcos with respect to their traditional services, e.g. access to CLECs and competing ISPs
• Cable cos. and cellular cos. can exclude other providers
![Page 17: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Government as Purchaser
• Telecommunications Access Grants example
• City ownership and operation permitted with a supermajority (65%) vote
Humphrey Institute
![Page 18: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Odd Ducks
• Open video system– 1996 Act
• Telecommunications purchasing cooperative
![Page 19: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Net Neutrality
• Congress and FCC have not set rules on Internet service
• Discrimination against customers not permitted (Comcast-BitTorrent case)
• Quality of service and pricing
• Volume caps or pricing
![Page 20: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Universal service
• Is broadband now a public good so that it should be treated the way telephone was?
• Where would the subsidies come from?
• Overall subsidies vs. user specific subsidies
![Page 21: Minnesota Telecommunications Background](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051818/54b902794a795986028b4573/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Humphrey Institute
Convergence
• Triple play providers regulated at multiple levels
• For some things, FCC may be too distant– Individual consumer complaints – city or state– National uniformity has advantages
• States and cities may have lesser regulatory role as technology continues to change