minority ,and · 2014-02-03 · a. schools in those 23 counties had 70 pereent of the total state...
TRANSCRIPT
rr
4(-411-143575
TITLE
INSTITUTION
PUB pATENOTE
EDRS,:pRICEDESCRIPTORS
, IDENTUIERS
DOCUMENT RESUME
SO ow 243
-Racial and Ethnic Distribution of Pupils and Staff inCalifornia Public Schools, Fall 197,3. A Report '-to theState Board of Education.California State Dept. of Education, Sacramento."Bureau of Intergroup Relations.29 Nov 7448p.; Tables 3, 4 and ,10 An the A ppendix may not-reproduCe clearly due to ismall type .size
MF-$0.83 HC-$2.06 Pius Postage.'Comparative Analysis; 'Data Analysis; *Demography;Eleientary Secondary Education; *Ethnic Distribution;Professional 'Personnel; *Racial Distribution; *SchoolDemography; *State .11rveys; *Statistical Studies;Student. Characteristics; Tables (Data) ; TeacherCharacteristicsCalifornia
ABSTRACTThe repor t provide statistics, for` 1973 about pupils
arld staff in California.in eadn school, distri.ct,.or county centraloffice by racial or ethnic group categories. It was the firstCalifornia racial and ethnic survey to be designed and conducted bythe Department of Education, Office of Program Evaluation andPesearch. The survey found that early in the 197317LI school year morethan 309 :of the 4.4 millionpupils-in California public schools weremembers of racial and ethnic minority grOgpsi-compared with 25% in1967-68'. Statistics are preRtnted on the distribution of staff bytype of position and sex in'each.Tacial and.e.thric group and theconcentration of minority ,and majority group personnel by geographicand other classifications'. In addition,' -the report presentsa-comparison of fall 1973 with fall 1967.-data. In 1973-74, minoritiescomprised 11.6% -of classroomrteacheirs, 12% of total professionalschool staff, and 9.7% of the, professional'' staff employed in school,district and county central office positions. The data indicate anincrease in the number.of minorities employed whencoMpared with,the,number reported in the 19661767-survey. Most of the gain by minoritieswas in numbers and ,proportion of clasStoom teachers. There was asignificant growth-also in' the ranks of minority principals andssistant 'principals. An appendix cdntains 16 tables and 10 figuresshowing relevant, data. (Author/AV)
)
,,
*44******************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished *
* materials not available ftom-other sources. ERIC makes every effort ** to obtain the best cORy, available. Nevertheless, items of marginal *
-At reproducibility ate often encountered and this affeicts the quality *
:4 !4c of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available .** vi,a the ERIC Document ReproductiOn Service (EDRS) 'EDRS'is not- '*
responsible for the quality_ of] the orilleinal, dOcument, Reproductions *
---'ic-'10tirreci-Wibllaa±e the best that ca be made from the original. **************A4************t*********************************4***
c, ., .
04
51!
0
.=b
California State Department of Education .
'Bureau of Interg up Relatidns721 Capitol 11
Sacramento 9 814
September 1, 1974
U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.EDUCATION & WELFARENATIONAL INSTITUTE OF..
EDUCATION
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO-OUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN-ATING IT PAINTS OF VIEW OR,OpiNiONS
'STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE-SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITt,TE OFEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY
.RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISTRIBUTION. OF PUPILSiANDSTAFF
C. - -IN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, FALL 1973
L_
A Report to the State Board of,Educatiok
"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATER lAti;HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
A>t.
"441r,ei276_d:
TO THE EDUCATI6NAL RESOURCES\INFORMATION CENTER IERICI AND
.-`HE ERIC SYSTEM CONTRACTORS"
INTRODUCTION. In October 1973 all California school districts provided
the State Department of Education with a count of 'pupils in each school,
,
and of staff in each school and in each district or county.central,office,
by facial and ethnic group categories. Most of the information was re-.
qui'red to be submitted by many districts in the Elementary and Secondary
School Civil Rights Survey then being conducted by the U.S. Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office,for.Ciil Rights.Relied in-.
lormatidn was needed for adthinistrative purposes by the State Department
Of Education, which therefore combined the questionnaires and carried out
a single statewide survey, supplying the HEW, Office for Civil Rightg with1
the California data it required,'
Z!'-
Thig was the first California racial and ethnic survey to'be designed _
..s;o1c;--
and conducted by the. Department's Office'of Program Evaluation and Re-
search. 'Previously, in each
')
****-
the Bureau
The iureau
school year from 1966-67 through 1971-72,
of Intergroup Relations had been responsible for such survere.
advised and assigted'the resea3ch office in preparing this
lini4ahuaiy 1974 the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity .Commisaion_inclUdedglay-dalifornia school districts' in a survey obtain raciel-and-ethP#,information regarding school and district em ogees. ,Tbat survey wasconducted separately and the reports were subm ted directly to Washington,D.C. ,
"ir'-""
2
'
survey and obtained the computer printout sheets on which the present report)
is based. Data processing was done by the Department of General Seri/ices.
More detailed, information ig on file in the face f Program Evaluati6n'andA
-
Research and in the Bureau of Intergroup Relatidns.A(
PUPIL DISTRIBUTION. The, survey found that early in the 197,3-74 school year
more than 30perdent of the 4.4 million.pupils in California.publicschools .
01
were members of racial and ethdic minority groups, compared with 25 percent in
)
1967-68. .Mexican Americans and others of Spand:sh suAame.in 1973-74 comprised
more than.l7 percent. ,Nearly 10 percent were'Black, 3- percent were Asian' :
American,,pnd half of one percent' were American Indian.
-4
I
Thealack and Spanish; surnamed were qignificant by fewer in the twelfth grade .
, .
than in the third grade,'while Asian Americans and'others, including the White/
-, .
majority, maintained or increased fheir representation at the higher grade/
.1 /
.
level. 1:he extent to which dropping out of'school 6ontributes to the Black .
,
, l .* ,
and Spanishrsurnamed decrease is not known. Birthrate changes and other factors
also havean effect.:' (See Appendix, Table 1.)
. ,,
ile the statewide decrease in total, number of pupils continued, minority
groups,increase& in numbers and propOrtions as they have in each survey since
t 6
the mid-1960s. The number of Ariglo-majority -group pupils had dropped by. more. 4 .
than 100,000 in the two yearn since the previous survey. The proportion of that
, ..: . --, .
group had grown smaller in each successive survey, f4tm:74.7 percent in 1967-68... _ .
_
toc.69.5'percent in 1973 -74. In the same period,'Spsnish-surnamed ipupilg.ncreased. .
. -I .1,,A
1-4by 149,193,'Black'puptft by-60,268, and othdr Minotltiei by 51,096. (See Appendix,
Table,2.)
Of nearly ,114 million min6r4y-gi:Pup..pupi1s in' the state, 93 percent attended' r 1. ,f . J
-schools in the 22 counties of the standard.metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs)
3,
A -3
and 61'percent attended schools in the IV largest districts (those reporting.rx
15,000-8x-MOre guplIsI).
4.
'Schools in the SMSAs were responsible for the education of nearly 90 percent
0of'all public school pupils. They reported nearly 98 percent of'all the Black
pupils, 96 percent of,all the Asians, 90 percent of all t e Spanish-surnamedrl
pupils, and 64 percent of all the American Indian pupils. The Los Angeles'
metropolitan area reported 53 percent .of all the Black pupils in the state, and
> -
two SNSAs,
ofi all the
of all the
pupils .
Los Angeles-Long Beach and San Francisco-Oakland, reported 75 percentV
. 1,
Black pupils, 63 percent of all the Asian American pupils, 48 percrit
4
Spanish- surnamed pupils and 28 'percent of all the American Indian .
The 15 largest'school districts, all of them situated within.s andard metropolitan
statistical areas, reported 70 percent og the state's Black upils and 32 percent,
of the state's Spanish-surnamed pupils. The minority ehri:./
districts, taken as a whole, was more. than 45 pe/cent.
and 4.)
ment in those 15
ee AppendfX, Tables 3
CONCENTRATIONS OF MINORITY GROUPS. Figure see App= dix) shows the geographical.
distribution of counties in which the atten ance of lack, Spanish - Surnamed, and
Asian American pupils exceeded the statewi e averag for each group: Blaok0pLro-
portions were above the average in five counties: Alameda, Contra Costa; Los
Angeles, San Francisco and SOlano. Los 4ngeles C unty, of those five, was the
only one above the average for Spanish - 'surnamed upils. In addition to Los
Angeles, 18 other counties were above e average for Spanish-surnamed: toldat,
Fresno, Imperial, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, onterey,'Kiverside, San Benito,
JoaquinSanta Ba bare, Sa
Ventura and Yolo.
..s
ta'plara, Santa,Crui Tql4rg /
A
Schools in those 23 counties had 70 pereent of the total state attendance, 83
percent-of all the Spanish-surnamed pupils, 88 percent 'of, all the,Black pupils,
53 percent of all the American Indian pupils, and .84 percent of all the minority
pupils.
0
In nine other counties (Glenn, Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Luis Obispo,
San Mateo, Stanislaus, Sutter, and Ytiba), with a total of 1,061,412 pupils, the
\,00mbined Spanish-surnamed and Black pupil composition of each county was 10
.> 40 0
percent.or more. The 26 remaining countiesonearly all of-them rural, reported
4:total of 286,616 pupils (6.5 percent of statewide attendance) of whom less
than 1A2 percent were Black and less than 4 percent were o Spani'sh surname.
°.Most of the cpunties in ,which AmericanlindiAns exceeded the statewide average
s
were ou side the metropolitan areas. The 36 nOnmetrdpolitan counties reported
. -
36.
per-cent of all the American Indian pupils, 10 percent of all the Spanish-.
, . .
surnamed, 4 percent_of all the Asian Americans? and 2,percent of, all the. Blacks.
MEASURES OF IMBALANCE AND ISC?LATION (1). Wit in schooldistricts the racial
and ethnic composition of individual schools differsesignifictiatly, inomany -, ''t
,cases?...)ecause of " neighborhood school" policies and practices iNcIties z;1.'
.
. ,
towns where residential segregation is common. (District boundaries are
established by State action, while school attendance Patterns are determined
. by local governing boards. A child attending the school for his grade level%
, )
,,
,
,
Which is nearest his home is said to be in !.the "neighborhood" school.) A .
- . k.. ..Applying one measure of significant difference, there were09T1ncheols in
. , °'
California in 1973-74,which deviated by more than, IA percent froth the mean in. ..tp_ . . r
their districts for any racial or ethnic geoup, inclOingthe AngioniejOrity
, ..i, i ) o'group. 'Those'schoole were within the jurisdiction of 221 school dtstricts in. . ._
.
44.counties. (See Appendix, figilre 2:)
o
5
0 N.
t.
s'
c
-5- 1
More than 1.3 million pupils were in attendance at the 11799 schools..They
A
included 64 percent of all the Black pupils in the state and 42 percent of
all the Spanish - surnamed pupils. Nearly. one-quarter of all majority4itup
pupils, chose counted as other than American Indian, BlscIAOstan American, or
'Spanish-surnamed American, attenhd those schools. Most of the Whitss,4of
course, were in schools which had few'or no minority-group pupils. (See Appeh-
dix, Table 5 andf !#
During .the six-year ottclud,-the,numbet of pupils attending schools that were
/
significan4ly differenCrrom the district mean by this "15 percen t" iilleasure4
V
.
decreased by 75,2r2 5.2 percent. Mast of the decrease is ,found in the Anglo
majority group, although some occurred in. he Black group. SpaniSh.%.gurndmed
1
pupils repre ented 5:2 percent more of the total attendance in such schools in
1973-74 than they did in 1967-68. (See Appendix, Table 5.),
. ,,
.Resuplts of sit* state surveys shdw thefollowing.numbers of schools imba.lancedNp, - . % ,I . , -- seg..
bi this measure: :, -,'
e .
.
:
,
.. .
i' . Number or-15% , Number 'of Pupils in
Deviating. 157. Deviatini.
School's " Schools.
Schoui'Year
Number-of Districtswith 157 Dgiating
Schools. ti
4
19 68
19681..69'
1969-701970-71
'19-71-72
4'973-74,
,
:. 4.
...
13817
1,8311'; X10
1,162'10697
1,794
'
.°
1,432,848,483,535'
. 1,461,636.' 1:416,1471,356,522 '14357,636,
t 212
197205.
206208,
. '241
4
-.. a.
MUSD OF IMBALANCE AND IS01ATION,(2)." A different, measure is that ,of :s
.°-. ,
, .,.. , ..
schpals in which miirority-gfbrup pupils comprise 50 persent or more of ihe
.1: i0t01,%attendance at the school. There veers 1,344,such schools in CalifoWia'''. :,f, ,
- , in .1973-74. Thby were within the jurisdictionofdi's:riClsin32cokinties.- .-, ,-
(Seg Appendix, Figure 4.) I 0,. "
1
1,2
-7-
.
° ..
The degree of-isolation of Blqk pilpils in1473-74 continued to be much.4.
.
y
greater -than thad of the hanish-surnamed. More than 145,000 Blacks, 34
percentof the statewide total, attended schools that were 90 percent or
more BlaCk (compared with 38 percent in 1969 -7Q), and-53 percent of the
.. ,
Eflack pupils in the svte attended chools that were 50 percent or-morer
. °.
-Black (compar71 with 66percent in 190-70).. .
,
, ' 4 i
. About 4t:000'Spanish-turnmedt pupils, 6 percerit.of the statewide total,
4
attended schools that were 90 percent or more Spanishsurnamed (the same per-16
centages as in 1969 -70); and'32 percent of the state's Spanish-surnamed pupils ,
1
attended schools thaE,were 50 percent or more'Spanish-surnamed (compared with4:
28' percent. in 1969 -70);
It was.the Anglo majority.group, however,- that was .the most isolated fromPI
.
othe rs
c4racial and ethniC groups. The "All Other" ategory in this survey corn..:, -4,,,
0. ,
.;prisethe pupils not identified as minority, that is,wlather.Amerivan Indiah, 1 .
A.
s4i, .0 BlaCk, Asigh AmericAn, or SPagibhpurnametAmerican. Nearly 42 percent of the , .
, * a ,
:.."Others" attended schools with less-than 10 percent minority pupils in atten--. % ! 0
.
. .
,dbnce. Another 53 percent were in schools from 50 to 89.9 percent,pon-midorityl,.
, il.
,
and 5 percent were in'eChools,that Were 50 percent or more minority. (See.,
Appendix, Table 9.) t
%
4 .I k
STAFF DISTRIBUTION.. The 1973-74 'racial and ethniC'purvey iticluded'not-only the%
pilpi..ls butilso the professional staff-at individual schools and at'colncy and, . i. .
.
school t trict central offices.- In addition to statistics 'on the distribution .
1 i'
..,
.
. .... .
of stairf- by type of position, and sex in uetch, racial and ethnicgroup,.,and bh4
chhcentration of thindilfy- and majority -group personnel by geogniphical and
other classifications, this report preIebts,a moridon of fall 1973 with fat
41:1967data, malting it possible to assess the r lts of efforts to promote equal.lr
,
O
e
P. -A_ .
-
4.
Ss4 . '4
.., . 1.4
,I employmentApportunity Vh, California education for aid yoars prior to the recent
, vadoption by thenBtateiBoard of Educlition of an affirmative action policy-and
regulations,
While 30 percent,of California' pupils in 1973-74 were members of racial and
-ethnic minority groups; minorities were represented by 11.6 percent of Claim--
.x-oom teachers, 12 percent of total-prafessional. schoor staff, and 9:7 per-Nr-
cent of the professionalstaff employed in school district and county centralAt,
office posiW,.ons.. .
The percentage of staff was less than thatof pupils id each minority group,
but the difference was /greatest for the Spanish-surnamed, Pupils of that
groUp comprised 17.2,percent of the statewide total, while male Spanish-surnamed
teachers were 4.1 percentof all male teachers, female Spanish-surnamed teachers
were 3.0 percent of all female teachers, andhe 6,155 Spanish-surnamed teachers,
of both sexes were 3.A percent of all teachers. Total Spanish-surnamed profes-,
sional staff was36 percent of all school positions and 3.8 percent o4 all
, central office positions.N'1/4
Blacks comprised 9,7 percent of alImpils, 5.3:percent of 41 teachers, 5.64 1'
percent of all school staff and 4.0 percent of all central office staff. Asians
comprised 1.0 percent of all pupili, 2.7 percent of all teachers; 2.6 percent
of all school staff Snd.1.5)percent of all central office staff." American Indians
compriSed .5 percent of all pupils,2-percent of all teachers, .3 percent of
all scho p staff and percent of all central offide staff. (See Appendix,
Tables 10 and 11.) 4
..Detailed 'examination of Tsblea ID and 11 shows considerable differences in typds
and leVels ofposition'betiireen male and female among various racial and ethnic
grups. Women teachers outnumber men in all groups, and male. principals greatly
8
-9-
outnumberjemale principals in all groups. In ichooldistrict and county central
offices men greatly Outnumber women at higher administrative levels, but not at
other levels; minoxity-group %embers also are found at relatively lower,admihis-
tkitive levels, and comprise only 8.9 percent of principals and 7.4 percent of
top management.
Black women in all school and central office professional positions are mdre
than twice the number of Spanish-surnamed plus Asian_American women in such _
positions; even though the latter two groups together have more than twicothe
pppil population of Blacks. Spanish-surnamed men, hoWever, outnumber Black men
_ in these positions.b
Figure 8 shows the proportion of .c assroom.teachers compared with the proportion
;. of pupils fn each of the groups counted in the suivey.
.
SIX-YEAR COMPARISON. The total number of teachers, principals and assistant
pri5cipals increased by 1,185 between fall 1967 and fall 1973. The reported
-complement of these school professionals had grown in each of the minority
groups: 254 more American Indians, 1,825 more Blacks, 1,666 more Asian Americans,
.
and 2,209 more Spanish- surnamed Americans. It had decreased in the ."All Others"
or majority-group category by'4,196.
Most of the gain by minorities was in numbers and proportion9 of classro2
teachers. There was a significant growth, however,,,in the ranks of minority. 4
principals and assistant principals: Blacks had risen frorii 148 to 5.3 percent
of all principals and assistant principals;, Spanish- surnamed from 1.8 to 3.9
percent; Asian Americans froe,4 to 1.1 percent; and American Indians from,.2
to percent. Minorities still held only 11 percent of these Positions in the
Stit-67(See ApPeridix, Table 424,
9
6.
-10-
In the same six-year interval the ratio of all teachers to all pupils, which
had been 1 to.27, had become 1 to 25.?
Increasing reptesentation of minority
groups among teachers hadpdone more than keep pace with increasing' numbers
"'and proportions of minority pupils,although a large gap remained_ln the four
minority groups. There was now one Spanish - surnamed' teacher to 124 Spanish-
surnamed pUPils, one Black teacher to 45 Black pupils, and one American Indian
teacher to 55 American Indian pupils. The Asian teacher-pupil ratio was 1 to
2 &, and the "All Other" ratio was 1 to 19. (See Appendix; Table 134-
CONCENTRATIONS OF MINORITY-GROUP STAFF. Four counties, Alameda, Los Angeles,
San Francisco and Solano, reportedtabove=state-average school employment of
Black professional staff. Eight counties reported Asian Ameiican school staff
above the state percentage: Alameda, Los Angeles, San Benito, San Franiseo,
I
.San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Clara and Tulare. Sixteen counties reported
Spanish-surnamed school staff above the average for the state: Fresno,
Imperial, Kings, Los Angeles, Merced, Monterey, Riversid San.Benito, San
Bernardino, San Francisco, San Joaquin, Santa Barbara, ante Clara, Tulare,
Ventura and'yolo. (See Appendix, Figure 6.)
O
-;
The. number of,Black, Asian American, and Spanish-surnamed teachers, principals
and other prolessional staff employed at schools in each of the 58 counties
'appears in Table 14 (see Appendix). Schools in a few metropqlitan counties
reported most of the minority professional staff in the state, with Los Angeles
County alone reporting 60 percent of all.B1i4 school staff, 44 percent of all
Asian American school staff, and 34 percent of all Spanish-surnamed'school staff.
At the other end of the ranking'by numbers, -Table 14 shows that there were 22P,
counties with no Black teachers, prilvipals or other profeisionals at schools,
12 counties with no Asian school staff, and four counties with no Spar:fah-
surnamed schodi staff.
The state's 14 Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas are listed in Table 15
(see _Appendix): SNSAs, With 88 peicentof all professional school and central;,
staff, reported nearly 95 percent of the minority-groupmembers so employed.
They had 73 percent of all American Indian school and central staff, 98.percentN.
. of allBlack staff, 95 percent of all Asian American staff, and 90 percent of
allSpanish-surnamed staff.
Schopls in) two of the metropolitan. areas, Los Aggeles aR0 San Francisco-Oakland,
.... A1 .
employed 78 percent of all Black staff, 65 percent of Asian American, 44 percent..0
of Spanish-surnamed, and 29 percent of American Indian.
,/Pupils and staff data for the 53 largest school districts,-those with 15,000 or
more puptisOo attendance, are presented in Table 4 (see Appendix).
0
Those districts, which reported 49 Percent of all 'the pupils and 46 percent of
all professibnal staff in the state, employed-79 percent of all the Black pro-
fessionals and 50 percent of all the Spanish-surnamed professionals.
4
The I5 largest districts vmployed 69 percent.of.the state's total Of Black pro-.
1
fessional schqol end central staff; the three largest districts employed 4BPS
percent of the Black total. Hinor,ity averages for school and central staff,
compared with 12 percent in the state as a whole, were 21 percent in the 15
largest districts an 24 percent in the three largest.
Figure 7 (see Appendix) compares the proportion of pupils of different radial
and ethnic gripps with that of professional staff kn the,51 districts reporting ,
\15,000 or more pupils.
. J. ,\ 4
. *,
HEARTIES OF IMBALANCE AND ISOLATION 14) .' The remaining data are Cbgcerned with
A
tthe, distribution of professional staff in schools identified earlier in this
1-
I t
.60
.r
report as 'deviating _from. the district mean of pupil membership in any.-racial
or ethnic group, or having a predominantly minority student*y.
Table 16 (see Appendix). shows the distribution of pupils and priifes4ional staff
at all schools infthe state compared with that of pupils and professional qtaff
Aat school eniified.by measures of imbalance and isolation. The widest dif-
ference 1 composition'-is in the Black group: For all schools the staff
percentage was 5.¢, while1
for schools 60 percent or more minority it was 18.9,
and for schools deviating significantly from .the district mean which Was 11.9.
/--
k,
How schookrofessionals of dhie-ie7ii-racial and ethnic groups are divided
-= ....
between iheseVschools ancothers-in tbe stateis-shown graphically in Figures
t.
.
9 and 1Q (see Append 4"
. , 4 3-.
.
;-
FRG:clz11/20/74.
*
A
12
t
a
4
sT.
*7-TABLE 1
STATE E DISTRIBUTION OF PUPILS
.S;01,
Ad/l'''. 4-American Asian Spanish All
/Remit Survey, Fall 1973
, k Indian Black American Surnamed Others 'Total-., ,,
,.........
(1.
Numbh. of pupils.in membershii, as of 10/03 '* 22,316' 432,418.. Percent .5. ' 9.7
Number of pupils retained this year-in same grade 239 6,737 ,
. Percent t . .5 14:7
Number of pupils fOr each grade indicated:
'Grade Aig.
N 1,634 33,019Percent A-',..5 10.4 .
. ...
Grade .9 ,
Number' (*: . 1,978 33,984Percent 11 4 .6
a9.8'
Number . :!",t.. . =. 1,755., 33,746
.
PerCent , '' ,5 1;4
Grade_ 12*tt
.
.
-' Number :-i,- ,173, 22,141Percent
,
t
7:9
'Number of pupils in EMR or EMH classes
, Percent
. Number of.pupita in TMR orTHH classes;Percent
Number of pupils in physically handicappedprograms including specific learning disabilities.
Percent
Number of pupils in-other special education programsPercent
133,430 765,419 3,088,7583.0 17.2 69.5
767 10,272 ,2.7,749
1 1.7 22.4 60.6
,....--,
.
10,318 61,188 212,336
3.2 .19.2 , -. 660
Grade 6 ' 10,489 60,027 242,0483.0 , 17.2 69.5.
10,010, 57,147 ,254,880,',
. e2.8 -16.0 71.3
? 8/8 35,08' 211,74,
..,1.1 12.7
.
75.9
4,442,341.
,100.0
45,814100.0
318,495100.0
348,526 i,,,,
1013.0'
,538
1 100.0
281,721
.
100.0
a
Total number of pupils'in special education
-c Percent.
. -..,
14, 8,642.8 21.2
77 1,508
.6, . L2.5
205 4,682.4 "13.7'
f
--,3,718)"-N 9.04
96i. 1B,550.7 . 1245:H/
) 442. 8,083 23,2931.1 19.8 57.1
274 2,498 7,7542,3" 20.6 64.0
',1,270 -v9,009 '38,459jf.4 16.8 '. 71.7
394 6,310 30,655'1.0 15.2
. 74.0
-2,iso. ;25,900 100,16117.5' 67.7
40,775100.0
12,111100.0
53,625100,0
41,441100.0
147,952100.0
V 141,
Fan 1967Percent
Fall 1968Percent'..
Fall 1469
Percent
Till 1970,
AmericanIndian Black
i3,195 .372,150
16,662 388,267.4 8.6.
15,863 404,272
2;43 8.9
.Percent
1971
rercent
Sk,,Fall 191Percent
.-2,171,;-2794,4 412,8189.0
19,319 '424945.4 9,1
22,36 - 432,418-
.')TABLE 2
STATEWIDE TOTAL NUMBER OF PUPILS, K-12
BY RkIALAMD1-ETHNIC GROUPS
Rhcial/Ethnic Survey, 1967 to 1973
Asian Spanish
American, Surnamed
91,455 616,276
2.1 13.9
105,724 . 644,505
2.3 14.3
96,845 684,432
2.1 15.
99,092 707,6392.2. 15.5,
97,978 ,
, 2.2'
1334430,
'9.7 43.0
/25,22716.0
765,41917.2
Filipino
Isessrsz.
- 2
and
btherNonwhite
Total All
:Minority Others Total
'30,141 1,123,167 3,308,828' 4,432,045
.7 25.3 74.7
11 1,154,558- "'3,360,833 4:515,341
.46 25.6 74.4
.. 4,201,212 '3,358,397 .4,559,609 !
- - 26.3 73.7
Inciense or-Decrease:19,67-to 19W3
Nupber Pupils,
Percent .
+9,121+.2
40,268+1:.3
+41,975+.9
+149,193+3.3
36,231.8
49,704'1.1
..111
IP as.
1,273,05927.9
1,315,17328.9
1,351,58330.5
3,290,33072.1
3,230,106710.
3,088,75869.5
6
4,563,389.
4,545,279
4,442,341
I1 OD +230,416+5.2
.-220,,120
-5.2
+i0,296
NOTE: In 0867; 1970 and 1971 the category "Filipino and Other NOT:white" was used in state surveys. In other years, \
members of those groups were counted'in other categories.
..... ..
-/-- ..4
4
6
4
TABLE 3
PUPIL DISTRIBUTION, STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
IndianAmerican
lack. ,
Anaheim-Santa Ana- Pupils 804 4;001'-Garden Grove Percent-. e-- , .2 -k 1.1(Orange County) .
,
Bakersfield Pupils 347
5,(Kern County) Percent .4
f:!:
.
Fresno Pupils 586(Fresno County) Percent .5 7,060.12o
v.Los Angeles-LongBeach Pupils 3;746 230,084(Los Angeles County) Percent .3 16.6
Oxnerd-Ventura Pupilst A.87. '
2,327(Ventura County)-- Percen .2 2.2
Sacramento Pupils 976 14,847
.
(Placer, Sacramento, Percent c .5 .. 7.3Polo Counties)
' Salinas-Monterey '
(Monterey County)
San Bernardino- PupilsRiverside- Ontario(Riverside, 'San
Pupils, 127
Percent *: 2
Bernardino Counties)
3,7396.9
18,0646.5
19,580
Pupils 95,482San.Franclsco-Oakland 12,458
PercentfAlameda, Contra Costa, , ,4 -16.0'Marin, San Francisco,San Mateo tounties)
I..
San Jose Pupils 1,093 ... 8,772(Santa Clara County)
. Percent .4737J
. -
Santa Barbara Pupils, i . , .)?6f- , 11..1490
(Santa BarUkra County) Percent 1. .6 ' 3:4
_Stockton Pupils 226 4,890) (San Joaquin County) Percent :3 7.2
Asian Spanish AllAmerican Surnamed vMinorities
Total.Others.
6,035 42,810 53,652 327,0231.6 11,2 14.1 85.9
...
1,014 18,051 -' -25;295 60,1841.2 . 21.1 -29.6 20.4
.
)2,117 34,731 44,436 109,692
. 1.9 31.7 , 40.5 59.5
65,256
45,696 312,055 -591,581 791,638, 3.3 22.6 42.8 57.2
24,4201:,823. 20,083 83,4581.7 18.6 22.6
6,828 18,816 41,467
)7.4,. .
3.4 20.5161,172
79.59.1._....-
..
2,480 12,463 '18,809 35,4134.6 ' 23.0 34.7 65.3
2,070 56,729 78,386 198,63728.3 71.720.5
(San Diego County) Percent .4 6.4 '13.4 22.4' 77.6
San Diego lupils ,198 7,b16 40,670 68,664 237,405
38,569 191,37354,864
32.1 67.9- .6.5 9.2
403,963
8,592, 68,007 212,68149,5503.1 . 17.7 24.2 75.8
1105 11,365 : 14,800 -._ 43,5101.9 19.5\ 25.4 74.6
/080 13 20,312 47,2212.9
i:11
.. .30.1 69.9
23.4
Total
380,675
85,479
1,383,219
107,878
202;639
54,222
277,023
306,069
195'036
280,688
i 58,310/
-67,533
Vallejo-Napa Pupils 305. 6,369 2,401, / 4,805'8.1 '
2r. 1:3 45;485 59,365480(Napa, Solano Counties) Pertent .5 10.7 4.0.
TOTAL, ALL STANDARD Pupils 13,942 423,008 127,724 690,408 1,255,082 2,713,046 *68,128. * METROPOLITAN Percent .4 ' 10.7 3.2 17.4 31.6 , .68.4STATISTICAL ARIAS
17 '-* .
018
4,
' I
19r .211etriefo ranked accordlag-to_numbor of pupil. reported:
D.
ti
TABLE 4
PUPILS AND PROFESSIONAL STAFF, SCHOOL DISTRICTS REPORTING 15,000 OR MORE PUPILS .
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
DISTRICT .
,
PUPILS STAFF SPANISH SURNAMED BLACK
TotalWernher
Minority TotalNumher
Minority.
Number Percent Nialser PercentNe4.-rtnr I Number 1 Pupil. Staff
155,607 1,116
.14,416 231
11,132 223
5,169 68
4,359 100
11,787 . 100
1,514 28
6,345 35
6,134 98
1,663 302,483 29
3,528 " 48,037 113
3(487 36
7,003 80
3,154 29
9,939 61
7.338 88
2,041 21
2,520 60
7,,680 42
10,911 130,
896 18
: 3,087 AL 52
3,764 ANN 55
1,453 11
14;508 104.
,4;649 37.
'' 3,016 13
.,.. 6.090 89
'i 6,180 59
3,508 33
9I1' 21
4,428 50
1,194 24
3,387 21
5,259 38
1,317 ' 37
289 7
1,262 24
5,512 81
2,651 18
3,760 36
2,687 68
1,791 12
7,763 113
2.090 33
3.815 17
3,463 27
867 7
1,706 14
'4,963 59
..:1,155 19
,
393791-8-..a....o34963,
t
,
7 '
Pupils Staff
26.5 1.1
11.7 3.914.3 4.4
8.3 _ 2.37.7 ' 1.0
21.5 ,!1.0
2.8 1.2
12.6 1.7
12.9 ' 4.33.7 I.yr-6.4 , 1.6"9.4 2.824.6 ' 6.210.1 2.2 .30,453
21.4 5,3
9.7 r.9
133.1 , 4.724.4 6.06.9 1.5
8.9 4.428.2 3.740,2 9.63.4 1,4
12.1 3.914.9 5.1
6.0 1.1
59.6 9,919.2 3.4
12.7 1.3 '
21:7 8.827.0 5.8
15.1 3.34.2 2.021.5' 5.25.8 2.5-
17.1 2.2
26.7 ,97.0 4.3
1.6 .8
7.1 2.732.0 9.615.3 2.2
23.0 2.216.6 84:6
11.3 1:749,1 14,5
13.3 ,. 4.924.8 2.4
22.1 3.85,6 1.011.1 2,1
32.3 8.28,8 2,6
11".*1 3.9
Pupils Staff
155,132 4,48116,381 48623,791 5627,447 191
36,490 1,016.
5,349 87
337 6
' 275 13
8,421 182
471 24
12,306 219.
96 4
561 32
1,097
5,188 116
344 '5
907 -,,,,. 41
4,580 114671 15
94 ' 4
57 9
2,531 75
25 1
10,158 231
2,486 63
177 , , 824 4
1,573 ' 40.11 1
- 540 22
404 7266 1
138 21
5,505 129 "
157, 4
1,43 14'
3,1 6 62
23 1
102;ty 03,231 93
1,323 41
213 ,10,
45 1"6"
523 21
17 , 2
1,802(4, 56
119 e. 3
453 15
277 10
39 -'0114 JO460 2856 3
346,161 9:709v-
Pupils Staff
' 25.4 16.3
13.3 8.2
30.5 11.1
11.9 6.6
64.4 30.8
9.8 3.5
.6 .2
.5 .6
17.7 8.0
1.0 1.0
31.8 11.7
.3 1.3
1.5 1,8
88.2 66.3
15.9 7,7
1.1 .3
3.0 3.2
15.3 9.9
.2 1.1
.3 .3
.2 .8_
9.3 5.5
.1 .1
40.0 17.1
9.8 5.8
.7 .8
.1 . .4
,6.5 3.6
' 0 .1
2.3 .21.8 ".7
,1.2
i.1
.6 2.0
26.7 13.5
.a_ .4
7.2 1.7
16.2 6.3
.1 of< .1
.6 018.3 10.5
7.1 4,8
1.2 .4
.9
3.2 2.7
.1 .3
11.4 7.2
.8 .4
2.9 2.1
1.8 1.4
.3 0
.7 .9
3.0 3.9,
' .4 ;4 '
15.9' 9.5
Los Angeles UnifiedSan Diego Cite UnifiedSan Francisco UnifiedLong Beach UnifiedOakland City UnifiedFresno City Unified,San Juan inified
Ste.f,es2, trove UniTrecr i
BierraieKto City UnifiedMount 7:ahlo Unified214-km'one Unified
An.neit Union High'San Jose City UnifiedCompton Un J .
an Berns dino Citytrilled
Frmoet Uni iedliacien,'n-La
'UnifiedStockton City Unified:orrente Unified -fleeing. 'Unified
vor.sik-IA Mirada UnifiedSsnta Ana Unified ' -. ,
Ne.port Veal Unifiedgaseens tnifiedRiverside Unified ,
sini Valley Unified
4:tebello UnifiedHera-ire Unified
Ole eale Unified,
ABC Crified5..et-rater tniod High
9,,htt Clara Unified .
CtrrtIna Union Elementary1,...1-4 unified
C.4.11-,ont Union Nigh.' 1--,-
ter County Joint Union-014hBi%erifield City EllgentazylinntInton Beach 1.1616nHigh2a1ns Virile Peninsula Unified ...tt.4---
.1.nte:ey veninsull 17'.V.4ied ."rBut SiJe Union atipr, : ,
Ventura Unified
Corona-Norio Unifiedolpayd,oataa NighDoidn'tg 4rified
Alum Ihek Union ElementAry _ ',
/
Placentia Voified_
E.
....Ontar.o-Mbntclair_flemengary-
Chula Vista Elementary'.spa valley Unified
Covina Valley UnifiedRowland Unified
Futlerton Joint Union High
Ts i A L
641,228123.46678,01062,413
56,692' "54,758
53,255
50,34*47,58845,547
38,644
37,596
36,68734,523
32,677
32,460
30,070
. 30,01429,501
28,43827,247,
27,12726,272
25,41815,28824,404
24,33224;153
23,66623,50122,876
22,01621,48520,60220.52419.763
' 19,71518,76117,843
/17,703
, 17,204
17,314
16,33816.208
15,843'15,797
15,751
--N45,675 .
15,676 '
15,39915,38'9
15,36215,148
2.173,734
339,573 55.633,505 27.154,921 70.4
14,981 24.0'.44,492 78.5
18,035 32.9. 2,658 5.0
7,669 15.2 .
10,582 39.0
2,692 6.3
16,182 41.94,281 11,4
10,486 28.6
34,029 98.6
12,533 38.4
4,610' 14,2.
11,128 39.712,978 43.2 -
4,102 13.9
3,001 10.6
8,212 30.1
13,770 ' 50.8
1,244 4.7
13,973 55.0
6,539 25.91,876 7.7
,16,163 66.4
7,321 30.3
14.8
6,594 28.1
7,221 31.6
4,621 21.0
1,828 . 8.5
-',' 10,142 19.21,573 7.7
5,074 ! 254,-- 8,655 43.T
1.651 8.8
, 870 . 4.9
5,543 r 31.3
7,475 43,4
3,030 17.7
e. 1r..,1",8416 23.8: .504
11,11 21Skf(", 40;046 63.6
...9' 2,471-- 15.7,\e,.4,48210 28.6
, %1 783 30.5
114132 7.4 ,
2,108 13.7, '_,._
5,670 36.91.61\ 10.5
,.
829;970 \ 38.2
27,4795,947
5,062
2,902
3,2952,5202,430
2,1142,2752,3191,866
'1,7081,822
1,655
1,512" 1,503
t
1,297
1,470. 1,381
1,349' '1,134
1,359
1,267
1,350
1,084
989
1,0461,097
1,017
'1,014
1,022
995
1,041956964
', 942
977-,,863
818884
8468036
9
23
77
6
71
712
725
, 662
723
.4,12.
102.322'
7,086 25.8
764 12.81,283 25.3
341 11.81,289 39.1
220 8.7
70 2.9
89 4.2
387 17.0
96 6.1
4 318 17.0
81... 4.7
195 10.7
1,171 70.8
206 13.6
74 4.9
134 10.3
296 20.1
65 4,7
85 6.3
110 9.7221 16.3
28 2.2
327 . 24.2
125 11.5
35' 3,5
184 17.6
115 10.5.0
., 28 2.44I56 15,,4'v
- 78 7;0*-4'' 69 63 2
83 8.0187 . , 19.640 4.141 4.4
111 11.445, 5.2 f25 3.0141 16.0154 18.2
29 3.6 \56 8,0
108 13.7, 18 21i6
216 . .2718
46 6.8
40 5;6
43 6,011 1.5
30 . 4.5
--4if0.-...:16:0-
33 :,n0:-,. _
1 297 - /16.9
TABLE 5
PUPIL'DISTRIBUTION IN ALL SCHOOLS DEVIATING BY MbiE THAN,:
15 'PERCENT FROM DISTRICT-WIDE PERCENT. OF _PUPILS N ANY GROUP'ht
Racial/Ethnic Survey, '1967 to 1973":-.'
Filipino,.-
1and
,American . 'Alien . Spanish Other .
,
TotalIndian Black American. Surnamed Nonwhite 'Mlnofity
Fall 1967 3,253 278,620 49;747 .271,975 12,649 616,244Percent ' .2 ,i . 19;4 3.51" 19.0
' .9 43.0e
Fall 1968 A 3,988 290,926 55,645 298,383 . -- 648,942Pergent . ..3 19.6 3.7 - 20.1 -- 43.7 '
.
.
.
Fall 1969 3,730 285,558 50,909 307,338 -- 647,535Percent ,.3 . 19.5 3.5 . 21.0 -- 44.3.
Fall 1970 3,761' %- 281,552'. 50,766 312,464 - .15,743, 663,986Percent .3 ,' 19.9 3:6 22.0 1.1 ' 4649
.,
Fall 1971 3,976 267,175 .46,527 306,420 19,160 643,258Percent A
43 ,-- , 19.7 3.4° ' 22.6' ,1.4 47.4
Fall 1973 4,598 275,709.
-62,190 328 804 -- 671,301Percent .3 -721U--... 4.6 24.2 _- 49.4 ,
Increase or decrease:1967 to 1973
Number of Pupils ,+1,34A,Percent +.1
-2;911
4**9
+12,443 +56,829+1.1 +5.2
r
GP 4E1
MI 4E1
+55,057+6.4
0 All... Others Total
816,604 1,432,848A7.0
834,503'. 1,40;535'.56.3 .
,
814,101 1,464636. 55.7
752,161 1,416447,53.1. --... ,.
e., 713,264 1,356,522¢ 5246 '
s. .-
' 686,335 1,357,63650.6
-130,269 -75,212
41
1' .
'
J ,NOTE: In 1967, 1970 and 197f the category "Filipino and Otherlionwhite" was used in state surveys. In other years,' .members of those groups were counted in other categories. . -.>,e ,= - -.
.....
,-, .J , : ;..,
I41,
21 O
.
22
/TABLE 6
PUPIL DISTRIBUTION IN ALL SCAOOLS 50 PERCENT OR'MORE MINORITY
RaciallEthnic"Survey, 1967 to 1973
Filipinoand ___
AMerican- Asian' Spanish Other,- Total AllIndian- - Black American. Surnamed Nonwhite Minority Others ,Total
F 1967 1,990 279,283 33,772 229,589 8,548 -553,182 139,523 692,705Pe cent .3 40.3 . 4.9 33.1 1.2 79,9 20.1
Fall 1968 2,421 2%7,660 46,889 248,366 -- 585,356 147,59 732,931, .Percent .3 40.6 5.0 33.9 -- 79.9 20.1j1 '
'.
Fall. 1969 2,394 364,042 '36,537 69,196 ..... 612,169 10;027 715,196Percent .3 39.2 4.7 34.7 -- 79.0 '21.0.
i..
Fall 1970 2,658 308,284 38,711 286,049 11,516 647,218 177,084 -824,302Percent .3 :37.4 ,4.7. *47' 1.4--; 78.5 21.5 4
.. .. .
. . Fall 1971(
21,869 '' 316,499 40,241 306;359 17,989 . '683,957 200,861 884,818'PAcent . .3 35..8 ', 4.5 34.6 2.0 , 77.3 . 22.7,,..
Fall 197 '4' , 3,340 '318,038 54,639 346,242i 722;259 213,801i 936,063i
Percent .3 34.0 . 5.8 37.0 . --;4
77.2 22.8
Increase or decrease:- 1967 to 1973*
Number of Pupils +1,350 +38,755 +20,867 +116,653Percent' 0 -6.3 +.9 +3.9 ..
o
4169,077 +74,281 +243,35.8-.2.7 . +2.7
NOTE; n 19,611 1970 and 1971 the category "Filipino and Other Nonwhite" was used in state surveys. In other years,members of those groups were counted in other categories.
-23
Er
4TABLE 7
DISTRIBUTION OF SCHOOLS 50 PERCENT OR MORE MINORITY IN DISTRICTS
REPORTING TOTAL ATTENDANCE LESS THAN 50 PERCENT MINORITY
Aes
DistrictMinorityPercent ' 50.0-
54.9'55.0 -
59.9
60.0-
64.9
10.0-14.9 1 1 2
15.0 -19.9 .3 1
-20.0-24.§ 4 2.,°
25.0 -29.9 '10 12 8
30.0-34.9 15 8
35.0 -39.9 23 12
0-
'12
:40.0-44.9 ' 21 24 9'
45.0-49.9 8' .8 6
Av.
r/
(380 Schools in 91 Districts)
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
INSchools
507. or re Minoiity
65 . 0
69.9r-
70.0-74.9 '84.9 89.9
90 .
94.9
1
3 3 1
1
5 3 3 4 8
10 1-
8 5 7
9
4
11
2
10
3
1
2
5
2 6
4 5
TABLE 8
DISTRIBUTION OF PUPILS, SCHOOLS -50 PERCENT OR MORE MINORITY IN
DISTRICTS REPORTING` TOTAL ATTENDANCE LESS THAN 50 PERCENT MINORITY
(380 Schools in"91 Districts)
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
a
95.0-100.0
0
AmeriCan Asian 'Spanish. Total All
Indian Black . American Surnamed Minority Others Total
Pupils 1,093 53,260 7,472 83,7)8 145,563 76,795 222,358
percent .5 24.0 3.4 37.7 , 65.5 34.5
25
t
INCIDENCE OF,SPANISH -SURNAMED GROUP ISOLATION
Racial/Ethnic Survey, iell 1973
Composition Of
School Enrollment
Numberof
Schools
. Number :of.
Spanish, Surnamed
'Pup:JIB
Percent of All1$aniih Surnamed,Pupils State
50.0 to 59.9 percent Spanish lurnamed , 213' 70;820 9.
60.0 to 69.9 percent Spanish surnamed 129 52,830 6.9
70.0 to 74.9 percent Spanish surnamed 78 34,851 4.6
80.0 to 89.9 parcrnt Spanish surnamed 38,931 5.1
90.0 to 100.0 percent Spanish surnamed 62 46,062 6.0
#
pm to 100.0 percent Spanish surnamed 547 243,494 31.8.
INCIDENCE OF BLACK GROUP ISOLATION
Racial /Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
Composition ofSchool ETIollment
5.d.O to 59.9 percent BlaCk°
60.0 to69.9 percent Black
70.0 to 79.9,peiTent Black
50.0-to 89.9 percent Black
411
90.0 to 1p0.0 percent Black
50.0 to 100.0 percent'Black
Number Number of',
of Black
Schools Pupt3.s-
48 15,247
39 4?,
33 17,636
53 35,990
152, k, 146,542
325
4 '
229,807
Percent of,AllBlack
Pupils in State
pa
3.5,
3.3
4.1
8.3
.33:9
51.1
-INCIDENCE OF MAJORITY-GROUP ISOLATION
1
(
*axial/Ethnic Survey, Fall 19734
Composition ofSchool. nrollment
-. _Numberot4
_Schools
Numberof7 Non - Minority
0Pupili
Vercent .of All
Non-Minoritymills in State'
5p.o to 9.9 percent otherthan minority
60.0to 69.9' percent Other,than minority
70.0'io 79.9 percent otherthan minority
80.0 to 89;9 percent Other
.
than minority°.
90.0 to 100.0 percent 6ther. -than-minority
50.0 to 100.0 percent other,than minority r
.448
582
,929
1,507
-2,066
5,532
I
169,189-'
235,375
436,233
813,429
1,289,078
2,943,304 4
5.5.
7.6
14.1
26.3
41.7
95.3 '
0
0
Classroom ;Teachers
TOLE 101,
STATE SUMHAEE; PROFESSIONAL STAFF AT SCHOOLS
RaOitliHthnic Survey Yell 1973
.
, .
Amfriclan Spanish All ='- LOLIA14.1- °
r WI . Asian Surname Others. Total
FemaPer
TotalPercent
''30-86i,-.3
.2
406.2
rNon -teaching. MalePrincipals Percent
FemalePercent
Total'
Percent
37
.6
7
.7
44.6
Non-teichingAssistant Principals
HalePercent
FemalePercent
TotalPercent
9
.4
7
.6
16
.5
Other Full Time Male 22Professional Staff Percent
33
.3
Fema1
F$rcen
Total 55Perce
, TOTAL PROFESSIONAL Male 254SCHOOL ,STAYF . * Percent\ .3
. .
4 0 ---Female 267Percent .2 ,!
1
. Total 4 521Percent :4 '
2,186 1,222 2,788 p 61,227 67609- 3.2 1.8- 4.1 90.6
7,395 3,616 3,367 98,006 112,604436', -- . 3.2 3.0 87.0
9,581 4,838 6,155 159,233 ' 180,2135.3 2.7, -3.4 88.4 ,
- .-
167 48 213 5,531 5,996*2.8 .8 3.6 92.2
91 33- 795, -545-9.6 2.0 3.5 84.1
, 258 67 . 246 6,326 6,9413.7 ,,1.0 3.5 91.1.
381 126 417 - 4,888 ... 5,8346.5 2.2 7.1 83.8 '.
4,.
1.a
995 237 552' 8,523 10,3409.6 2.3 5.3 82.4
1,376. 363 969 13,411 16,1748.5 2.2 6.0 82.9
44,.
2,887 1,418 3,532 "73,641 81,7323.5 '1.7 ,4.3 ' 90.1-, ..
8,621 34896 4,005 108,197. 124,9866.9 3.1 3.2 86.6
11,508 5,314 7,517 181,838 206,7185.6 2.6 3.6 88.0
153 ... '22 114 .1,995. 2,2936:1 1.0 5.0 87.04
-140 24 53 873 1,097'
12.8 2.2 4.8 79.6
293 46 . 167 2,868, 3,390
8.6 1.4 - 4.9 84.6 _
.
,.
NOTE: Dori not include Non-Professional Instructilinel Staff.
1,
2 7
.\
, .
.TABLO1
... o __
STATE SUMMARY,'PROFESSIONAL STAFF AT COUNTY
F OR SCHOOL DISTRICT CENTRAL OFFICES
. Racial/Ethnic Survey, Pall 1073
Officials, Administratorsand Managers
a
Consultants and Supervisors.'at institutions
GM.
All Other .
Professional Staff
_..
Total ProfeisionalCentral Staff,
28
AmericanIndian , Black
AsianAmerican
SpanishSurname
-AllOthers Total'
.
Male . 17 74 14 09 2,997 )'3 ",211
Peicent .5 2.3 .4 - 3.4 93.3
Female 5 33 '2 11 314 365
Percent . 1,4 9.0 .5 , 3.6 86.0
.
,Total -,22
%107 16 __120-
__-3,311 3,576
Percent .... .6.
3.0 .4 3.4 r 92.6
Mile 10 '76 22 91 11,209 1,408
Percent 5.4 1.6 6.5__.
85.9
'Female '11 125 21 64 . 933 1,154
Percent 1.0 10.8 .1.8 5.5 _. .80.8
Total 21 201 43 155 2,142 2,562
Percent .8 7.8 1.7 6.0 83'.6 ,-
Male 7 80 59 166 3;061 3,373
Percent .2 2.4 1.7 4.9 90.8
9 199 109 124 4,886 5,327,Female
,percent .2 3.7 2.0 .2.3 ,91.7
Total 16 279 168 .290 , 7,947 8,70Q
Percent- .Z ,3.2,. 1.9 3.3' .91.3
Male 34 230 95 366 7,267 7,992
Percent .4 2.9 1.2 4.6 90.9
Female 25 ' ,357 132 199 6,133.- 6,846
Percent .4 5.2 1.9 2.9 89.6AP
Total $ 59 587 227 565 13,400 14,838
Percent .4 1.5 3.8 90.3 z9
1
TABLE 12.
CHANGES IN RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISTRIBUTION OFIr
TEACHERS AND. PRINCIPALS, 1967 COMPARED WITH 1973
.t
AmericanIndian
't
Black AsianSpanish-Surnamed
OtherNonwhite
AllOthers Total
Fall 1967
TOTAL TEACHERSAND PRINCIPALS
Fall'1973
t
TeachersPercent '
Principals*
Percent'
Teachers .
Percent
Principals*Percent
Percent
Teachers.,Percent
Principal's*
Percent
Percent
196.1
16
.2
212.1
.2
60
. .6
466'
.2
+210+.1
+44+.4
+254+.1
8,1374.5, ;
1701.8
8,3074.4
9,5815.32
5515.3
10,132, 5.3
"41,444+.8
+381+3.5
-41,825+.9
3,2461.8
3p
3,2851.7
4,8382.7
1131.1
4,951 f.2.6
+1,592+.9'
4,74
+.7
+1,666+.9
(4,189'
a .2.3
170_
1.8
4,359'
6,155
4133.9
3.4,
-41,966'' 41J
+243+2.1
'42,209+1.1
561.3
12
.1
573
.3
--a,--
MAID
^Wa
IM
a ft
a*
=P=4
163,523
90.9
9,100..95.7'
,172,62391.2
159,233,'88.4
-9,194
89.0;
r'168,427
88.4
-4,290-2.5 -
+94-6.7,/
-4,196,=2.8
179,852
9,507
189,359
180,213
19,331
190 544/.
-4361
+824
+1,185
' TOTAL TEACHERSAND PRINCIPALS
1967. COMPARED
-WITH 1973Increase or Decrease
TOTAL TEACHERSAND PRINCIPALS
*Includes%Assistant Principals
.30. 31.
.4
A
13
CHANGES IN RATIO 0 RS TO PUPILS
EY RACIAL AND
1967\OMPARE
patio of Teachers to Pupils
American Indian teachersto American Indian pupils
American Indian teacheisto all pupils 1 to
Black teachersto Black pupils
Black teachersto all pupils
Asian' teachers g
to Asian pupils
Asian teachersto "all puPils
Spanish Surname teachersto Spanish Surname pupils
Spanish Surname teachers--to all pupils
.
All other teachersto all other pupils
All other teachersto all pupils
All teachers'to all pupils
\,
1 to 50
1 to 595
1 to 32
-1 to 1,491.
to 165
1 to 1,156-
1 to. 20
1 to 27 '.
1 to 27
32
1973
1 to 55
1 to 10,956
1 to 45
1 to 464
1-to 28
1 to 919
1 to 124
4
TABLE. 14
COUNTIES RANKED BY NUMBER OF BLACK, -ASIAN
AND SPANISH SURNAMED PROFESSIONAL STAPFATSCHOOL5
AND CENTRAL OFFICES-- --
Racial/Ethnic Survey,. 411,AM
BLACK
Rank County
-..
No.
.
ASIAN
Rank County
---"f
No.
SILltagi':'-7SPANI,.,
) ,,Illink'-'2..- 'County ' N.
1 Los Angeles 6,856 1 Los Angeles 2,359 1 Los Angeles 2,5372 Alameda 1,371 2 Santa Clara 485 2 Santa Clara 7093 San Diego 575 3 San Francisco 480 3 Orange 5594 ,San Francisco 563 4 Alameda 423, 4 San Diego 5295 Sae Mateo 342 5 Orange 255, 5 Alameda 3856 SacraMento 339 6 Sacramento 191 6 San Bernardino 3407 Santa Clara 307 7 Sap Mateo 173, 7 San Francisho 2238 Contra Costa 302 8 Contra Costa 153 8 Fresno 2229 San Bernardino 281 9 San Diego 134 9 Riverside 218
. *10 Riverside 180 .10 San Joaquin 104. 10 Ventura 21711 San Joaquin up 11 Fresno 99 11 Sacramento 20712 Solano 135 12 Tulare 87_ 12 'San Mateo ta13 Orange
.128 13 Ventura 62 13 Monterey 139
14 Fresno ' 112 14 Monterey 55 14 TUlare 13615 Kern 109 15 San Bernardino 51 , 15 San Joaquin 13116 Monterey 109 .16 Riverside 49 16 Santa Barbara 12717 Ventura .. 77 17 Kern 43 17 Contra Costa ' 12418 Santa Barbara 51 18' Santa Barbara 40 18 Kern 11819 Marin 49 19 Solaro
.
39 19 Imperial 11120 Merced 42 20 Marin . 35 20 Kings . 10321 Imperial 24 21 . Santa Crliz .26 21 Merced 7622 Sonoma * 21 22 Merced 25 22 "Sonoma. 7323 Stanislaus 20 23 Stanislaus 25 23 Stanislaus 7024 YUba 19 24 Sonoma 4 23 24 Yo/o . 5825 Tulare 18 25 Yolo 22 25 Santa-Crus 4626" Kings - 17 26 Kings 21 26 Marin 43
' 27 Santa Cruz 9 27 Imperial . 18 27 Solano 4328 San'Luis Obispo 8 28 Placer" 17 28 Butte . 28
29 Madera * - .- .7 29 Sutter. 14 29 Placer 2730 Sutter r 5 30 .Napa -10 30 -San Luis Obispo' 2231 Butte " * 4 314 Yuba 10 31 Yuba 1832 Yolo 4 32 San Benito 7 32 Humboldt 1733 Lassen 3 31. Humboldt 6 33 San Benito . . 15;34 Humboldt' 2 34 *San Luis Obispo 6 34 Madera 1335 Mendocino 1 35 El Dorado 5 35 Shasta,. 1136 Shasta 1 36 Shasta 5' 36 Tehama 10'31 Alpine 0 _ 37 Glenn 4 37 Napa _
938 Amador 10*-, 0 38 Butte 3 38 Lassen . 839 Calaveras 0 39 Inyo" 2 .39 Glenn 7
40 Colusa 0 40 Lake 2 40 Mendocino 7
41' Del Norte .0...
41 Madera.
2 41 Sutter 742 El Dorado 0 42 Mendocino 2 42 El Dorado 643 Glenn ,0 43 Siskiyou 2 43 ' Tuolumne
. 644 Inyo 0 44 Tuolumne . 2 44 Colusa 545 Lake 0 45 Colusa 1 45 Del Norte - 446 mariposa 0 46 Modoc 1 46 Siskiyou. 447 Modoc 0 , 47 Alpine! 0 47 Lake 3
0-- ----48 -.-----Inyo -- ; .2t----48---mono . 0 --148Amadof
49 Napa 0 49 Calaveras 0 49 Plumes 2-
50 Nevada 0 50 Del Nhrte 0- 50 Calaveras -A51 placer 0 51 Lassen 0 51 Mono ' -1
52 Plumes "Ii 52 Mariposa, 0 52 Nevada
. 153' San Benito 0 53 Mono 0 53 Sierra 154 Sierra 0 54 Nevada 0 54 -Trinity . 155 Siskiyou
*Tehama-,0 '55 Plumas 0 55 Alpine 0
51 -0 56 Sierra, , .0 :56 Amador 0
57 Trinity 0 57 Tehama 0 57 Mariposa 058 Tuolumne 0- 58o Tririity
,
is3 3
0 ... 58 Modoc '.
0
a,
...:.,tABLE 15
PROFESSIONAL STAFF AT SCHOOLS AND CENTRAL OFFICES
STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS AND OTHER AREAS
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Pall 1973
Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove(Orange County)
StaffPercent
AmericanIndian Black
17
.2
128
.7
Bakersfield Staff 11 109(Kern County)
a.
Percent .2 2.4
Fresno Staff 7 112a(Fresno County) Percent .1 2.1
Los Angeles-Long Beach Staff 88 6,856(Los Angeles County) Percent 10.7
Oxnard-Ventura Staff ,--. 2i 77(Ventura County) -,,.' Percent .4 1.6
Sacramento Staff 31 343(Placer, Sacramento, Percent .3 3.4Yolo Counties)
Salinas-Monterey Staff 4 109(Monterey County) Percent .1 3.8
San Bernardino- St;ff 41 461Riverside-ont rio Percent .4 3.5(Riverside, n
Bernardino C unties)
San Diegol St f 30 575(San Diego County) 'Pe cent .2 3.9
San Prnritisco-takland aff 77 2,627(Alameda, Contra Costa, Percent .2. 7.9Marin, San Francisco,San Mateo Counties)
4San Jose Staff 33 307(Santa Clara County) Percent .2 2.2
Santa Barbara Staff 6 51(Santa Barbara County) Percent ,.2 1.6
.
Stockton Staff 7 153(San Joaqu n County) Percent .2 4.6
.
--'11a11ejolapa Staff 13 135(Napa, Solana Counties) Percent '14 4.6
TOTAL, ALL STANDARD Staff 416 12,043METROPOLITAN Percent , .2 6.2STATISTICAL AREAS
.
TOTAL OTHER AREAS ,' Staff 155 186Percent .6 .7
STATE TOTAL Staff 571 12,229Percent .3 '5.5
:sem:1Ln
255
1.4
431.0
s 99 *
1.8 y
4,359t 3.7
, 62
1.3
'23.02.3
.
55
1.9
. 100
A
134
.9
1;143.8
.4853.4
.
y 401.3
dr..
34'
104
3.1
491.7
5,2792.7
298
1.1
5,577 .
2.5
SpanishSurnamed
All *Others
-,
Total
5593.1
1182.6
2224.1
17,02194.6 ,
4,20393.7
...
5,023
91.9
18,000
4,484
5,463
/,537 52,246 64,0864.0
217 4,533 .4,9104.4 92.3
292 9,179 , . 10,0272.9 91.1.
139 2,588 2:8954.8.
.89.4
558 11,931 13,0994.3 91.1
529 13,349 14,617
3.6 91.3
917 28 ,,183 33,068
2.8 85.
0709, 12,572 14,106,'5.0 89.1
127 2,877 3,1014.1 92.8
131 2,954 3,349 -3.9 , 88.2
-52 2,697 2,946
1.8 . 91.5 '.
7,107 169,356'. 194,2013.7 87.2
798 25,152. 26,589'3.0- 94.6
*
7,905 194,598 220,7903.6 '88.1
-
All Schools
-
Schools- deviating bymore than 15 percent&ram district-widepercentage of pupilsin any group -
Schools 50or more mf.no ity
...-.
4
\TABLE' 16 -
.PUPILS AND PROFESSIONAL STAFF SAT. ALL SCHOOLS
COMPARED WITH PUPILS AND PROFESSIONAL STAFF
AT SCHOOLS OF DIFFERENT RACIAL/ETHNIC COMPOSITION
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
42
-do .
4 4f s .
'1? .
American .., Spanish ..Total 'All
Indian Black Asian. Surname Minorities' Others Total.4 . . .
.
..
Pupils 22,316 432,418 133,430 765,419 1,353,583 3,088,758 4,442,341-
Percent C .5' 9.7 3.0 17.2 430.5 69.5.
. ..
Staff 521 11,508 5;314 7,537 24,880 181,838 , ,20b,716'
Pertent ..
.3 $ 5.6 2.6 3%6./
12,0 88.0
',..... - .._._.
..
Pupils 4,598 275,709 162490 : 328,804 671,301, --.- 686,335 1,357,636Percent .3 20.3 .4.6 , 24.2 49.4 50.6
,
.
'Staff o 108 7,087 2,835 2,890 , 12,470 ., #4,931 59,401Percent ".2 11.9 1 4.0 4.0 21.0 79.0 .
,
Pupils 3,346 -318,038 54,639 346,242Percent . .3 34.0 , 5.g. 37.0 77.2
722;29 , 213,804 936,063. 22.8
ttlStaff 83 8,400- 2,276 ' 2,931 13,690 A ,30,782 '44,472
Percent 18.9 5.1 6.6, 3Q.8 49.2.
0
1
36
,Above-state-average enrollment of pupils of tree racial and ethnic groups, by counties. -.
Legend: ( )* - State average( ) - County average Racial/EthnicSIrvey, Fall 1973
0.1.
1
C1: SISyytx : Akt0C«
' .4 ,
11
it 1 ;
l i_..,. t 2,1
5 ' ,^r t /I
5, ..-. .....". ...... 1. , - - - .... -- ---.. . .1. 94.4 su pAssp4
=:: ;TRP41, ; ,....H
sl"ne, : 1
7 ..> ;,
i L,"', ms
er''...,;Ip 1
---- ...... A l (
keetCCIMO !...../ t
1 C)CU Mil
-- A t.grE .svraAI,.
.v. (.,.._...---..1_.1.,.., .3 -4
- L., -142 i -.45-..aw----; ,lit!''''7c-v-:-4
,
;'LAKE I 1'`-- `,A1 .'" ..'F-uaR
. iD : / .;
\I, 1.----.),-'s/,,---...1-'s-'-' % 7' no .,.. : ,, eLcorucx)
-..'"-------; 62 ,AmAcoR., n., 21.1-
.1 ' 1.3 ---....-1 ,.: . / .. 'T '''. -.4 cez....v.ss/rt.ruNK L'_, uopio
)c. " 117A :V.%c:-.;.- ..r..:0_94 ',
-"-..,.----- : .---i '. .- s----
,.",.....
ALMCA 1 ,i.A, 5/: lotAMPOSA / \....
3,37 -
1c;.9.L12';t; . '', c--1 fr.. ;
, - ,--- .
,79....".,:,,..7,4 'A.y," 3 \...,,,/;-
,--
..%
Is. $.04 's f,:gtS-40
.4.7-:". .4/ %WP.:-.44 1..l ...-s... -.., ...-
.14.04tre ' 81 4--riLLim ..,
, ......3
--;r,,,,,as 1
- .3
22`.
26 \ ....,..,,," 7 ;,
SAN Lus os.sro II:l PLERi../.- ---- r--
ISAN 6ERNARDes3
65_ SAN FR,C.e.,--
\--6 .1..., 47 i
1
76...,
j.-,,.. , ..... ... '.1
SANTA CARIARA ; ----t......,.....--.-------411 ' ivENTIRA \ tcs moats 1
I 14 \\.) 817 ,...___)
....../*As, Arvtragt
"aur43N,' 24'38/
&Pow10J4 MOO
FIGURE 2 NUMBER OF SCHOOLS DEVIATING BY MORE1 11
THAN 15 PERCENT, FROM DISTRICT-WIDE 119
'PERCENTAGE OF PUPILS IN ANY GROUP .
Racial /Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
39
1111
43-Total Minority Pupils7- L053,583
*.e
76-5,419.
Spanish Surnamed-Pupils_
22,316aito
American Indian Pupils
4,442,341NNtal Number of Pupils.
31432,418-
Black Pupils
0
133,430
Asian Pupils
3,O88,758758
. .AlleOther Pupils':1' -:
Figure 3: Proportion of pupils in all schools deviling by more tlyin 15 percdp
from district-wide percent of pupils in any group, and-In all othgf i&hools.4 ,
Legend: EMMB Percent in deviating schools
- 01111 Percent in other schools _
Racial/Ethnic Suivey-INCI1 1973
.
,.,
40 :
E1
47
6
ie
,e'l--' ... _' \ , .-- .'
ksotAsiAi..-i :4
e Tatar, ;11
1.--...,..-- ----- "; -1
Telma.
....) %.../....N....s.' ....4%, Raw
: (
IN.,___:_(1 t--. ./....4 SeRRA..
*lark-- 4 p1241---1,C15r.1.("--T
".'m,_.
e ' ,...,,, PLACER
l1 i 't.i.--,..-: .--.... ;,--.
`` V,)
,Y j. CO R A DO
lfAPV11 -- 71 =)40410.)-4-44- 00-1-- 1
;
1 ! 8 ,-----,,,.... ,,' . isi.:4-7 -..1
71ffIll., 25 \--, -,---, ....
\-
24- s.r-4 t 5 (-;4-Rrip '.. -"-;-, / a.... ..... 40
---- ................M.....------------121 -1N4 FRArcrz . ; 1 __-,J 's, _.'",:....," XL .
L,V.,ALAAT ,../fiAm-V:flis,,;?e,, 144- / ..A___......... ..... ..
, CIVA ,) i i .1 PrIV
14., 51sZZY. 8 '.\ /.e a
"fir! s,
, le .... 9
........rd...)1,
,, 44.0-,4% I..,
4., '.,sorro' -S, 85 .."--rTIAARE
i.
%l, 1Wellesey. % r -4-".-,....... ,s 10 I -
126
s
\., ,/.10 1,
3.. \T- ---.,.; ?I.
SAN u.s c. ..:AlI.r a4, ....-r.........-----
(3.44 IstriNgta3 .-
.. 4 \..., e1
I
L, 29 34
SANTA eaptsvassJ
\tm' eats13
27 \) 548
RNERVIX
(Awe"-1
48) 24
........
NOM
FIGUEi 4 NUMBER OF SCHOOLS 5,0 PERCENT sutocooelP1314.
ORMORE MINORITY, .BY COUNTY 29J 49Racial/Ethnic Survey, Fall 1973
41-
765;419Spanish SurnameiPupils
15
22,316
American Indian Pupils
Figure 5:
45 1,353,583
Total Minority Pupils
54
0
4;442,341
Total Number of Pupils
. -
3,088,758Al Otfier. Pupils
11
,432,f8BrEick Pupils
4
133,430Asian Pupils
Proportion of pupils in all schools 50 percent or more minority,and In all other schools. -
Legend: UHMD Percent in minority schoolsE17.7.Percent,in otherschbol
42
Racial/Ethnic-Survey, Fall 1973
7
mr,
I
BLACK ASIAN SPANISH''
SURNAME
Tz's°11,80 0
P.14,35-
S 1
FRANCISCO, 1\sAr.r4DA(.1!
47.5)
:JoAQuINSAN ANCISCo.FR
"A ,2SAN mA(2.7)
.
\TOLOi.(5.2)
7ANTAL:..1%?....--.1.1.\......13.9)
/1 \
'maze/
ino
(4.8) ... 0. ivtARE
s:(4:")
.... ..120 .4)
ILOS ,Q4cRus
( 3. 7
/".
8%84". AAR
!)10, LAS"NIVRAANcRLE8
(4.9 (4.0)
-'State
AverageSatteAverage
2.5%
IStateAverage
. 3.6%
SAN
BERNAR8m0(4.4)
V
) RIVERRIDE
Ls, (4.1)
I mnitim.i (9.2)
FIGURE 6 ABOVE STATE AVERAGE EMPLOYMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SCHOOL STAFF OF THREE RACIAL AND ETHNIC GROUPS, BY COUNTIES-, 4
43 44 o
100
ALL SPANISH,-)
MINORITIES SURNAMED BLACK WHITE
90
80
70
.60
50
40 .-
.30-4
20 .
10 -1
0A
TOTAL
Pupils 829,970' 393,398 345161 1,343,764 2,73,734
Percent, 38.2 18.1 15.9 .61.8 -
Staff 17,299 3,963 9,709> 85,023 102,322
Percent 16.9 - -3.9 -9.5-- .83.1'
Legend: Pupils 0 Staff
FIGURE 7 PRO RTION OP PUPILS TO PROFESSIONAL STAFF IN ALLSCHOO DISTRICTS REPORTING 15,000 OR MORE PUPILS
Racial thnic Survey, Fall 1973
47
7.
100
90 -
80 -
69.570 -
88.4
60 -
50
40--
-
20 -
10 - 9.7
5 .2F4z moo
AMER/CAN
!WM.
5.3, 3.0 2,7
BLACK , ASIAN SPANISHSURNAMED
172'111;
3.4'
\
WHITE, OTHER, THAN
SPANISHSURNAMED
Percent of all , Percent of"liPupils, K.-12 Classroom Teachers
9
FIGURE' 8 PROPORTION OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS COMPARED WITH PROPORTION OF PUPILS,/
1 BY RACIAL AND ETHNIC GROUPS
Racial/Ethnic Survei,,Fa111973
:.46 77-
FIGURE 9
PROPORTION OF PROFESSIONAL STAFF AT
SCHOOLS DEVIATING'BT MORE (THAN 15 PERCENT PROM
DISTRICT-WIDE PERCENTAGE OF. PUPILS IN ANY GROUP,
AND AT OTHER SCHOOLS; BY RSCIAL AND ETHNIC GROUPS,
AmericanIndian Black Asian
Spanish AllSurnamed Others
Total .
Staff
Staff at schools4evisting by morethan 15 percentfrom district-wide- ,
percentage of pupilsin.any group
Percent of group'sState total ''
State total _
108
14.7
735
'
7,087 .
443.3
2,835
46.9
,
,....,/
.
2;890
18.6
46,931'....
23.4-,.. .
59,401
24.8
239,10516,366 6,039.
15,576 . , 200,389
Legend: Staff at schools deviating by,more than 15j)erdent fromdistrict-wide percentage ofpupils in any group Staff at other schools
.14
'FIGURE I0-
PROPORTION OF PROM:MORAL sum
AT SCHOOLS 50 PERCENT CR MORE MINORITY
AND AT OTHER SCHOOLS, BY RACIAL AND ETHNIC GROUPS
AmericanIndian
Racial/Ethnic Survey, Fall*1973
BlackSpanish
Asian . ,SurnamedAllOthers
TotalStaff,
Staff at schools450 percent ormore minority
Percent of. group'sState total
State total
83
11.3
735 ,
.
8,400 a .2,276 2;931 3O,782 44,472
51.3 - - 37.7 18.8 '- 15.4 l8.6
16,366 6,039 154,5761.
200,389 29,105
Legend: Staff at schools 50percent or More minority
,48
Staff at
other schools 11