minutes of the 445 meeting of the state level expert ... minutes of the 445th i.pdfpage 1 of 49 445...

of 49

445thmeeting of SEAC-Gujarat, Dated 25.10.2018

Page 1 of 49

Minutes of the 445th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee held on 25/10/2018

at Committee Room of Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Sector 10-A, Gandhinagar.

The 445th meeting of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) was held on 25rd October

2018 at Committee Room of Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Sector 10-A, Gandhinagar. Following

members attended the meeting:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC

2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

4. Shri R. J. Shah, Member, SEAC

5. Shri Rajesh I Shah, Member, SEAC

6. Shri A.K.Muley, Member, SEAC

The agenda of TOR/Scoping cases and Appraisal was taken up. The applicants made presentations on

the activities to be carried out along with other details furnished in the Form-1, PFR, EIA-EMP reports

and other reports.

6. SIA/GJ/IND2/20184/2017 M/s. Amarjyot chemical Ltd(Old name-

Dispo dyechem Pvt.Ltd)

Plot No. 231,232,233,235,236, Phase-

II,GIDC Vatva,Dist- Ahmedabad, Gujarat

Appraisal

Project / Activity No.: 5(f)

Project status: Expansion

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/20184/2017 dated 04/09/2017 for

obtaining Environmental Clearance.

• SEAC has recommended the project to SEIAA and SEIAA has issued TOR to PP.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by Satva Environ Consultancy based

on the TOR issued by SEIAA.

• This is an expansion unit proposes for synthetic organic chemical products as tabulated

below:

SR No.

Name Of Product CAS No. Proposed Capacity MT/Month

End Use of Product

1

Various Acetanilides

1800 Dye-Intermediates, Fast bases

Aniline Oil Acetanilide 103-84-4

Ortho Anisidine Acetanilide 93-26-5

Para Anisidine Acetanilide 51-66-1

Para Toluene Acetanilide 103-89-9

Bronners Acid Acetanilide 68189-32-2

Ortho Toluene Acetanilide 120-66-1

Amino Phenol Acetanilide 103-90-2

Para Cresidine Acetanilide 6962-44-3

of 49


Page 2 of 49

2-5 DMA Acetanilide 3467-59-2

2 600

Pigment/AZO/Direct/ Reactive Dyes

Baking Dry Sulphonation -4 B Acid Crude

88-44-8


88-51-7


6331-96-0

Baking Dry Sulphonation –MXOSA Crude

88-22-2

Baking Dry Sulphonation – 4 CAPSA crude

88-23-3

Baking Dry Sulphonation -6 CAPSA Crude

5857-94-3

Baking Dry Sulphonation OT5SA Crude

98-33-9

Baking Dry Sulphonation – Sodium Napthionate (SNA) Crude

--

Baking Dry Sulphonation – CLT Acid Crude

88-53-9

Baking Dry Sulphonation – Para Cresidine Sulphonic Acid Crude

6471-78-9

Baking Dry Sulphonation – OA4SA crude

98-42-0

Baking Dry Sulphonation -PASA Crude

13244-33-2

Baking Dry Sulphonation PCOSA Crude

6471-78-9

Baking Dry Sulphonation – Sulfanilic Acid Crude

121-57-3

3 Water Base Purified Baking Dry Sulphonations

1235219-21-2 250

4 Solvent Base Purified Baking Dry Sulphonations

1235219-21-2 250

TOTAL 2900

• The project falls under Category B of project activity 5(f) as per the schedule of EIA

Notification 2006.

• PP was called for presentation in the SEAC meeting dated 25/10/2018.

• Salient features of the project are as under:

Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores): 20 Crores

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter) 4389.60 Sq. m.

Green belt area ( sq. meter) 500 Sq. m.

C Employment generation 50

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply etc...

GIDC Supply

Status of permission from the concern authority.

ii

Water consumption (KLD)

of 49


Page 3 of 49

Category

Quantity KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 1.50 (B) Gardening 1.0 (C) Industrial

Process 57.50

Boiler 2.0

Cooling 2.0

Others 3.00

Industrial Total 64.50

Total (A + B + C) 67.00

1) Total water requirement for the project: 67.00 KLD 2) Quantity to be recycled: NIL KLD 3) Total fresh water requirement: 67.00 KLD

iii Waste water generation (KLD)

Category Waste water KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 1.50 (B) Industrial

Process 37.30

Boiler 0.50

Cooling 0.70

Others 3.00

Total Industrial waste water 41.50

Total [A + B] 43.00

-

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

Sr No. Description Capacity

1 Collection Tank cum neutralization tank 100 KL

2 Filtration system 5,000 L/hr

3 Holding Tank 100 KL

4 Spray Dryer System 2,000 L/hr

v Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point • Total Waste Water Generation will be 43.00 KLD from Which 1.50 KLD Domestic Sewage

sent to Soak pit and remaining 41.50 KLD send to In-House Spray Dryer

Domestic: Domestic effluent shall be disposed of through a septic tank/ Soak.

Industrial:

The total industrial Waste water will be send to ETP for primary treatment and then discharge though In House spray dryer. Hence we will achieve zero discharge.

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. , Name of CF

Membership of Common facility (CF) (For waste water treatment)

vii Simplified water balance diagram with reuse / recycle of waste water

viii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

Total reuse Nil KLD

of 49


Page 4 of 49

E Air

i Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

-

Sr. No.

Stack Attached to

Name of fuel

consumption Stack Height (m)

Air Pollution Control Measures

1. Boiler (2 T), 1 No.

Imported Coal or Agro Waste Briquettes

170 Kg/hr Or 200 Kg/hr

30

Bag Filter + Alkali Scrubber

2.

TFH (8 lac Kcal/Hour, each), 2 Nos.



3.

TFH (8 lac Kcal/Hour, each), 2 Nos.

Imported Cal or Agro Waste Briquettes


30 Bag Filter + Alkali Scrubber

4. D. G. Set (250 KVA)

HSD 50 L/hr 5 Adequate Stack Height

5. HAG-1 (25 lac Kcal/Hour)



11 Bag Filter

6 HAG-2 (25 lac Kcal/Hour)

-

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

-

Sr. No.

Stack Attached to

Stack Height (m)

Air pollution Control System

Parameters

1. Spray Dryer-1 (4,000 LPH)

11 Cyclone Separator + Water Scrubber

PM

2. Spray Dryer-2 (2,000 LPH)

11 Cyclone Separator + Water Scrubber

PM

3. Flakers 7 Water Scrubber + Alkali Scrubber

--

-

iii Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. As below:

� The entire manufacturing activities will be carried out in the closed reactors and regular checking and maintenance of reactors will be carried out to avoid any leakages.

� The tank vents will be equipped with either a carbon filter or an oil trap to prevent water vapor from entering the tank as it breathes.

� All the motors of pumps for the handling of hazardous chemicals will be flame proof

of 49


Page 5 of 49

and provided with suitable mechanical seal with stand-by arrangement � Control of all parameters on a continuous basis will be done by adequate control

valves, pressure release valves and safety valves etc. � All the flange joints of the pipe lines will be covered with flange guards. � All the raw materials will be stored in isolated storage area and containers tightly

closed. � There will also be provision of adequate ventilation system in process plant and

hazardous chemical storage area. � A regular preventive maintenance will be planned to replace or rectify all gaskets,

joints etc. � The unit will also develop green belt within the factory premises to control the fugitive

emission from spreading into surrounding environment

F Hazardous wastes (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i Sr. No.

Type of Waste

Sources Category

Proposed Quantity

Mode of Disposal

1 ETP Sludge

ETP Area 35.3 804 MT/Year

Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal by sending to TSDF

2 Used Oil Plant Machinery

5.1 0.048 MT/Year

Collection, storage , Transportation, Disposal reuse within premises in maintenance work or by Selling registered refiners

3

Discarded Container/ Empty Barrels

Material storage and handling

33.1 14.4 MT/Year

Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal by Selling to authorize recycler

4 Spent Acetic Acid

From Acetanilide Product

26.3 8400 MT/Year

Collection, Storage, Recover and reuse in Process after in house Acetic Acid Recovery plant

5 Spent Carbon

From Solvent Base Purified Dry Sulphonations

28.3 600 MT/Year

Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal by sent to co-processing

6 Process Residue

from Water Base Purified Dry Baking Sulphonation

26.1 24 MT/Year

Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal by sent to co-processing

7 Spent Solvent

From Solvent Base Purified Dry Sulphonations

26.4 11760 MT/Year

Collection, Storage, and reuse in process after in house distillation

8 Solvent Residue

Distillation Unit 26.1 240 MT/Year

Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal co-processing or sent to common facility

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc. (For HW management)

Not Applicable

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal Not Applicable

of 49


Page 6 of 49

(MSW and others)

G Solvent management, VOC emissions etc.

i Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered Solvents

• Types of Solvent : ODCB

• Spent solvents will be recovered through in-house distillation column with double condenser System

• 98% recovery will be carried out. • Recovered solvents will be collected in receiver and transferred to reaction vessel

through vaccum and completely reused within process.

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures

• Sources of fugitive emissions include storage of chemicals, solvents storage, loading and unloading section, raw material handling and, hazardous waste storage area

Measures:

• The fugitive emissions in terms of handling losses will get reduced by proper storage and handling.

• Hazardous chemicals will be stored as per standard criteria. • Periodically monitoring will be carried out as per the post project monitoring plan.

• Proper ventilation in storage & production area shall be ensured

• All materials must be stored in suitable packing to prevent contamination of air

• Enclosed system & efficient procedures for materials charging shall be ensured.

• Procedures for start-up shut down, operation & maintenance procedures shall be established & maintained.

• The coverage of greenbelt around the plant also acts as natural barrier to stop carrying of dust along with the wind current.

• During the meeting dated 25/10/2018, technical presentation made by project proponent.

• Salient features of the project submitted by PP are as mentioned above.

Observation:

• This proposal is for expansion of existing unit and for now proposes a new synthetic organic

chemical product. This unit is having valid CC&A for existing unit. Copy of CC&A, CC&A

compliance report is submitted. PP ensured that there are no court cases pending and no

public complaints against the project.

• Total water consumption will be 64.50 KLD. Total wastewater generation will be 41.50 KLD.

After proposed expansion, total industrial effluent will be treated in primary ETP and then will

be sent to in house spray dryer hence total zero discharge.

• Imported coal / Agro waste will be used as fuel for proposed boiler, hot air generator and

thermopack.

• Cyclone and water scrubber will be provided with spray dryer and flakkers.

• Hazardous waste management will be as per the HW Rules.

• The baseline environmental quality has been assessed for various components of the

environment viz. air, noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect. The baseline

environmental study has been conducted for the study area of 10 km radial distance from

project site for the period Nov.2017 to Jan-2018. Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried

out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO and VOC at seven locations, including the project site.

Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental Ground

Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using AERMOD. The resultant concentrations

are within the NAAQS. The modeling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed

of 49


Page 7 of 49

plant would not affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The

ambient air quality around the proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

• Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible

accident scenarios has been carried out. The detail proposed safeguard measures including

On-Site / Off-Site Emergency Plan has been covered in the RA report.

Discussions & Conclusion:

• Committee noted that PP has applied for the EC in the name of Dispo Dyechem and has

submitted EIA in the name of Amarjyot therefore PP was asked to submit all the relevant

documents in the name of Amarjyot including Form 1.

• Referring to the water consumption details, Committee noted that water consumption is not

satisfactorily defined under the head of ancillary head. PP was asked to address the water

consumption and waste water generation details on the grounds of actual requirement due to

proposed expansion.

• It is noted that additional quantity of waste water is proposed to be treated and evaporated

through captive spray dryer. Impact of emission of spray dryer during evaporation of treated

waste water cycle keeping PM in consideration on surrounding human habitation was

deliberated at length which could not address by the PP satisfactorily.

• Committee asked to submit the detailed impact assessment specifically considering the

emission of PM of product on surrounding environmental entities like human habitation,

agriculture fields, water bodies etc.

• PP was also asked to revise the EMP considering the detailed aspects of environmental

mitigation measures proposed with capital and recurring budgetary provision.

After deliberation, it was decided to consider the proposal in one of the upcoming SEAC

meeting after submission of following details.

1. Revised Form 1 along with all the relevant documents in the name of Amarjyot. 2. Revised water consumption and waste water generation details addressing under each

individual heads in place of generic terms. 3. Detailed environmental impact assessment of spray dryer emission considering the PM of

product on surrounding environmental entities like human habitation, agriculture fields, water bodies and its mitigation measures.

4. Revised EMP considering the aspects of environmental mitigation measures proposed with capital and recurring budgetary provision.

7. SIA/GJ/THE/21086/2017 M/s. Sanghi Industries Ltd

Un surveyed land, Village Akari, Sanghipuram, Ta: Abdasa Dist- Kutchh Gujarat. 370511

Appraisal

Project / Activity No.: 1(d)


• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/THE/21086/2017 dated 24/11/2017 for

obtaining Environmental Clearance.

of 49


Page 8 of 49

• SEAC has recommended the project to SEIAA and SEIAA has issued TOR to PP vide letter

SEIAA/GUJ/TOR/1(d)/245/2018 vide dated 17/03/2018

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by Eco Chem Sales & Services

(ECSS) based on the TOR issued by SEIAA.

• This is an expansion unit proposes for following expansion in thermal power plant from 60

MW to 120 MW products as tabulated below:

Sr.

No.

Name of the

Products

Quantity

MT/Month

End-use of products

1 Electrical Power 120 MW Captive

• The project falls under Category B of project activity 1(d) as per the schedule of EIA

Notification 2006.



Sr.

no

.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project

(Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 242.50 Proposed: 195.15

Total: 437.65

B Total Plot area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 10730 .Sq. m.

Proposed: 7270 Sq. m.

Total: 18000 Sq. m.

Green belt area,/Tree Plantation area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 3790 Sq. m.


Total: 6260 Sq. m.

C Employment generation Existing: 260

Proposed: 253

Total: 513

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well,

Surface water, Tanker supply etc...)

The water requirement is being / shall be

met from Sea Water for cooling tower and

existing desalination plant / mines and Rain

water storage at mined out pits with in

captive limestone mines for other purpose.

Status of permission from the concern

authority.

Sea water withdrawal permission is obtained

from GMB vide letter no.

of 49


Page 9 of 49

GMB/CNO/MND/8/III/31/2881 dated 23rd

April 2018.

ii Water consumption (KLD)

Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 8 8 16

(B) Gardening 20 20 40

(C) Industrial

Process

Washing

Boiler 146 146 292 DM Water

Cooling 6900 6900 13800 Sea Water

Others

Industrial Total 7046 7046 14092

Grand Total (A+B+C) 7074 7074 14148

1) Total water requirement for the project: 14148 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycle: 242 KLD

3) Total fresh water requirement: 14148 KLD


Category Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 6 6 12 Disposed off in soak pit

(B) Industrial

Process

Washing

Boiler 121 121 242 After PTP, used for

greenbelt

Cooling 5865 5865 11730 After PTP, disposed off in

creek

Others

Total Industrial

waste water

5986 5986 11972

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [For existing and Proposed]

of 49


Page 10 of 49

[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

Pre treatment Plant (PTP) – 2 Nos. 1. Capacity 300 KL per hour for sea water cooling tower 2. Capacity 5 KL per hour for DM reject water

v Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

Domestic: Soak pit

Industrial:

(1) Sea water cooling tower blow down - discharge in to sea after pre treatment in PTP (2) DM reject – After pre treatment in PTP used in greenbelt & dust suppression

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE, CHWIF

etc.

Name of Common facility

Not Applicable

Membership of Common facility (CF)

Not Applicable

vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

242 KL

E Air

i Flue gas emission details

No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA

etc.

Existing & Proposed

-

S.

no.

Source of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1 Existing

Boiler (260 TPH)

86

Lignite /

Imported

Coal /

Petcoke

1440 PM Sox Nox

E.S.P.

Proposed

Boiler (265 TPH)

86

Lignite /

Imported

Coal /

Petcoke

1440 PM SOx NOx

E.S.P.

-* as per CCA, and will be comply the current CPCB guidelines.

of 49


Page 11 of 49


Existing & Proposed

-

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height

(meter)

Air Pollution

Control Measures

(APCM)

1 Not

Applicable - - -

-

iii Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

Existing – Fugitive emission during raw material handling and feeding process and vehicle movements. Mitigation measures – Coal is transported in close belt conveyor, installation of dust suppression system in RMH area, Regular water sprinkling on haulage road and transportation of material is done by covered container, Fly ash is handled in closed automated system and stored in covered silo, Proper maintenance of vehicles, Green belt is developed along the plant premises as dust preventive barrier, Periodic air quality monitoring is carried out as per CPCB / SPCB norms etc. Proposed – Fugitive emission during raw material handling and feeding process and vehicle movements. Mitigation measures – Coal shall be transported in close belt conveyor, installation of dust suppression system in RMH area, Regular water sprinkling on haulage road and transportation of material will be done by covered container, Fly ash shall be handled in closed automated system and stored in covered silo, Proper maintenance of vehicles shall be carried out, Further green belt shall be developed along the plant premises as dust preventive barrier, Periodic air quality monitoring shall be carried out as per CPCB / SPCB norms etc.

F Hazardous waste

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement)

Rules 2016.

Existing & Proposed

i

Sr.

no

.

Type/Nam

e of

Hazardous

waste

Source of

generation

Category

and

Schedul

e as per

HW

Rules.

Quantity

(MT/Annum)

Disposal

Method

Existin

g

Propose

d

Tota

l

1 Used /

Waste oil

Plant

machinerie

s

I / 5.1 130 130 260 Co processing

in own

Cement Kiln

of 49


Page 12 of 49

-

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc. Not Applicable

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its

disposal (MSW and others)

Fly ash – 241920 TPA Bottom ash – 60480 TPA The same will be collected, stored & transported and disposed at own cement grinding unit


Not Applicable


• Not Applicable


• Not Applicable



Observation:

• This proposal is for expansion of thermal power plant project.

• The project falls under the activity 1(d) as per the schedule of EIA Notification 2006.

• Total Water consumption will be 14148 KLD. Total Waste Water generation 11972 KLD.

11730 KLD of cooling blow down after primary treatment will be discharged into sea and 242

KLD after primary treatment will be reused for gardening purpose within premises.

• Lignite/imported coal/petcoke will be used as fuel in boilers.

• High efficiency ESP will be provided as APCM.

• There will be no process and flue gas emission from proposed project.

• The baseline environmental quality has been assessed for various components of the

environment viz. air, noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect. The baseline

environmental study has been conducted for the study area of 10 km radial distance from

project site for the period 01/03/2018 to 31/05/2018. Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried

out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO and VOC at eight locations, including the project site.

Values conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental Ground

Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using ISCST3. The resultant concentrations

are within the NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed

plant would not affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The

ambient air quality around the proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

• Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible

accident scenarios has been carried out. The detail proposed safeguard measures including

of 49


Page 13 of 49

On-Site / Off-Site Emergency Plan has been covered in the RA report.


• Proposal is for expansion of power generation capacity from 60 MW to 120 MW with addition

of 60 MW.

• Compliance of conditions of previous EC, CCA and action taken by the GPCB under

environmental laws was deliberated and found satisfactorily addressed by the PP.IT is also

noted that no litigation/public compliant exist against the unit.

• Committee received Certified Compliance Report (CCR) from GPCB for existing EC. Committee found

that all the conditions are compiled as per the Certified Compliance Report (CCR).

• Looking to the location of the proposal and applicability of CRZ Notification, PP submitted a

letter of NCSCM mentioning that proposed location is outside of CRZ area. Details regarding

water consumption, efforts to reduce water consumption for proposed expansion discussed.

Referring to this, PP mentioned that they are using sea water for cooling through existing

pipeline infrastructure without increasing its capacity.

• It is also noted that fly ash generation due to proposed and existing power generation using

coal and lignite will be used in-house.

• PP noted that PP mentioned the proposed location is outside the Eco sensitive zone of

Narayan Sarovar Wildlife Sanctuary vide notification No as per the S.O. 1257 (E) dated 31

May 2012. It is also noted that PP has proposed adequate measures to curb fugitive

emission due to storage of coal considering wind velocity, height of coal by adopting

sprinkling through HVWS nozzles.

• Details of EMP and budgetary provision of CSR, CER were deliberated.

Considering the aforementioned project details and all the TORs addressed satisfactorily, it

was unanimously decided to recommend for grant of EC to SEIAA.

8. SIA/GJ/IND2/26091/2018 M/s. Keva Fragrances Pvt. Ltd Plot No. 170 to 175, GIDC Industrial Estate, Vapi, Gujarat

Screening and scoping



• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no. SIA/GJ/IND2/26091/2018

dated 30/06/2018 regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP

report.

• Project proponent (PP) has submitted Form-1, PFR and relevant details/information.


below:

Sr. no.

Name of the Products CAS no. / CI no.

Quantity (MT/annum) End-use of the products Existing Proposed

of 49


Page 14 of 49

1 Trans 2 Hexenyl Acetate 2497-18-9 6.00 120.00 Used in Flavours and Fragrances industries

2 Kambernoir O Nil

3 MECT/MTHF Intermediate

O 48.00

4 Terpinyl Acetate 80-26-2 Nil

5 Methyl Octalactone 39212-23-2 6.00 360.00

6 Phenyl Methyl Pentanol 55066-48-3 48.00

7 Verotyl II/F 239881 12.00

8 Emeraldine O 6.00

9 Di-Phenyl Methane 101-81-5 24.00

10 Heptyl Cyclopentanone 137-03-1 24.00 420.00

11 Aldehyde C-16 77-83-8 144.00

12 Trans-2-Hexenal 6728-26-3 240.00

13 Cantonal O 18.00

14 Aldemax 67715-79-1 Nil

15 Cyclomyral 68738-94-3 48.00 60.00

16 Keflorol 63500-71-0 18.00

17 Di hydro Benzo Nitrile O 24.00

18 Methyl Phenyl Acetate 101-41-7 12.00 408.00

19 Phenyl Ethyl Phenyl Acetate

102-20-5 108.00

20 Isobutyl Phenyl Acetate 103-13-6 24.00

21 Diethyl Adipate 141-28-6 54.00

22 Methyl Benzoate 93-58-3 156.00

23 Isononyl Acetate 40379-24-6 36.00

24 Phenoxy Ethyl Isobutyrate

103-60-6 Nil

25 Hexyl Acetate 142-92-7 Nil

26 Para Cresyl Acetate 140-39-6 Nil

27 Phenyl Ethyl Methyl Ether

3558-60-9 204.00 288.00

28 Pomeron/Benzyl Hexyl Ether

61103-84-2 Nil

29 Paracresyl Methyl Ether 104-93-8 Nil

30 Methyl Acetophenone 122-00-9 12.00 216.00

31 Phantolid 15323-35-0 Nil

32 DIBDPM O. Nil

33 12 OHD 6707-67-40 12.00 120.00

34 Dimethyl Hydroquinone 150-78-7 24.00

35 Isojasmone 11050-62-7 60.00

36 Nootkatone 4674-50-4 3.24 324.00

37 Valencene TBR ex Nootkatone

O. 4.56

38 Di Hydro Myrcenol 18479-58-8 Nil

39 Di hydro Iso Jasmonate 37172-53-5 Nil

40 Trans 2 Hexenol 192-95-0 6.00 120.00

41 Tropicate 14352-61-5 3.60

42 Di Ethoxy ethane 105-57-7 Nil

43 Orange LF 115 O Nil

44 Iriswood 4736-45-2 Nil

45 Kevolid/Tonalid 21145-77-7 Nil

46 Orinox 2040-10-0 Nil

47 Sagecate 131766-73-9 Nil 54.00 Used in Flavours

of 49


Page 15 of 49

48 2-5 Dimethyl Indanone 89044-48-4 Nil and Fragrances industries 49 Ozaflor 52424-60-9 12.00

50 Cyclofloranol (MC-Butenol)

52386-63-7 12.00 24.00

51 Para Cresyl Phenyl Acetate

101-94-0 12.00

52 Miner Perfume Blend Compound

O 300.00 900.00

53 Flavours and Fragrances

O 1200.00 1800.00

54 Menthone 89-80-5 288.00 ---

55 Emoxyfuranone O. Nil 6.5

56 Citronellol 1301152 Nil 360.00

57 Methyl Cinnamate 103-26-4 Nil

58 Floralyn O Nil

59 Citronellyl Nitrile 51566-62-2 Nil

60 Ambroketol O Nil 16.00

61 Trans-4-Decenal 64504-70-1 Nil

62 Lily Aldehyde (Duplical) 80-54-6 Nil

63 Damascenone 50% 23696-85-7 Nil

64 Mysonol O Nil

65 Hexalis O Nil

66 Verdoracine 14374-92-6 Nil

67 4-Terpineol 98-55-5 Nil

68 MDHMOL (Osyrol) 41890-92-0 Nil

69 Safranal 116-26-7 Nil

70 Kevanol O Nil

71 Sodium Sulphate 7757-82-6 Nil 1200.00

Total 3209.40 6796.5


Notification 2006.


• The project proponent along with their expert /consultant M/s. Precitech Laboratories Pvt. Ltd

attended the meeting and made presentation before the committee


Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 22.5 (Plant and Machinery) Proposed: 11.30

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter)

Existing: 75936 Sq. m. Proposed: NIL Total: 75936 Sq. m.

Green belt area ( sq. meter)

Existing: 22367.52 Sq. m. Proposed: 3059.01 Sq. m. Total: 25426.53 Sq. m.

C Employment generation Existing: 144 Proposed: 56 Total: 200

D Water

i Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well, GIDC Water supply department

of 49


Page 16 of 49

Surface water, Tanker supply etc...)

Status of permission from the concern authority.

Available


Existing KLD

Proposed (Additional) KLD

Total after Expansion KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 36 14 50 (B) Gardening 20 0 20 (C) Industrial

Process 74.4 -17.4 57 The fresh water requirement will be decreased after proposed expansion.

Washing 94 0 94

Boiler 10 9.5 19.5

Cooling 60 21 81

Others 2 1 3

Industrial Total 240.4 14.1 254.5

Grand Total (A+B+C) 296.4 28.1 324.5

1) Total water requirement for the project: 324.5 KLD 2) Quantity to be recycled:31.5 KLD 3) Total fresh water requirement: 293 KLD


Category Existing KLD



Remarks

(A) Domestic 30 5 35 (B) Industrial

Process *Low COD/TDS Stream: 57.78 High COD/TDS Stream: 8.00

*Low COD/TDS Stream: -5.78 High COD/TDS Stream: 32.00

*Low COD/TDS Stream: 52.00 High COD/TDS Stream: 40.00

Low COD/TDS Stream: To ETP High COD/TDS Stream: To MEE

Washing 94 0 94 To ETP

Boiler 5 2 7 To ETP

Cooling 6 2 8 To ETP

Others 2 1 3 To ETP

Total Industrial waste water

172.78 31.22 204

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity [For existing and Proposed] [In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc..

The concentrated wastewater stream having high COD/high TDS will increase from 8 kl/day to 40 kl/day and is/will be sent to in house MEE. Condensate from MEE is/will be recycled back for industrial use.

The low COD/ low TDS streams along with the other streams such as washing, cooling tower blow down, boiler blow down and scrubber is/ will be treated in in-house ETP consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary treatment facilities.


of 49


Page 17 of 49

Domestic: To septic tank/soak pit system

Industrial: To CETP, Vapi

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE, CHWIF etc. Name of Common facility

To CETP, Vapi


(For waste water treatment) Membership No. VWEMCL/2000-01/232/922


vii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD) [Source of reuse & application area]

Total reuseHH.KLD

Source of waste water for reuse with quantity in KLD

Application area with quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding feasibility to reuse i.e. w/w characteristics (COD, BOD, TDS etc.)

MEE condensate @31.5 KLD

Industrial purpose @31.5 KLD

COD<200

BOD<70

TDS<200

The condensate water from MEE will be recycle for industrial purpose.

-

E Air

i Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc. Existing & Proposed

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity

Stack Height (meter)

Type of Fuel

Quantity of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants

Air Pollution Control

Measures (APCM)

of 49


Page 18 of 49

Existing scenario

1 Boiler – 1 No. Capacity: 4 TPH

30 Natural gas

150 SCM/hr./ 2700 SCM/day / 540 SCM/day

PM, SO2, NOx

-----

2 Thermic Fluid Heater – 2 Nos. Capacity: 4 lakh kCal/hr. each

30 Natural gas

30 SCM/hr. PM, SO2, NOx

-----

3 D. G. Set – 3 Nos. (Stand-by) Cap: 750 kVA, 380 kVA, 110 kVA

30 Diesel 177.5 L/Hr. PM, SO2, NOx

-----

Proposed scenario

1 Boiler Capacity: 10 TPH

30 Natural gas OR FO

225 SCM/hr. / 4590 SCM/day OR 750 L/Hr./ 13.5 kl/day

PM, SO2, NOx

-----

2 Thermic Fluid Heater – 4 Nos. Capacity: 4 lakh kCal/hr. each.

30 Natural gas

60 SCM/hr. / 1080 SCM/day

PM, SO2, NOx

-----

3 D. G. Set – 3 Nos. (Stand-by) Cap: 750 kVA, 750 kVA, 380 kVA

30 Diesel 330 L/Hr PM, SO2, NOx

-----

-

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.) Existing & Proposed

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

Type of emission

Stack/Vent Height (meter)

Air Pollution Control Measures(APCM)

Existing Scenario

1 Reactor HCl 11 m Alkali Scrubber

Proposed Scenario

1 Reactor HCl 11 m Alkali Scrubber

HBr

-


� The fugitive emissions in terms of handling losses will get reduced by proper storage and handling.

� Raw Materials & Products are/will be stored in properly designated storage area and under good storage conditions to prevent any volatilities.

� Regular monitoring is/will be done of piping and fittings for checking of any leakages.

� Hazardous chemicals are/will be stored as per standard criteria. � Good housekeeping will be maintained in the plant.

F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement)

of 49


Page 19 of 49

Rules 2016. Existing & Proposed

i

Sr. no.

Type/Name of Hazardous waste

Source of generation

Category and Schedule as per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

Existing

Proposed

Total

1 ETP Waste (Dry Basis)

ETP 35.3 100 40 140 To TSDF

2 Sludge from MEE

MEE 35.3 100 100 200 To TSDF

3 Stripper Distillate from MEE

MEE 37.3 100 50 150 To incineration/ co-processing

4 Used Oil Plant & Machinery

5.1 10 2 12 Sale to registered refiners.

5 Discarded Containers

Storage 33.1 500 50 550 Sale to authorized recycler

6 Process Waste

Process 36.1 16.84 733.16 750 To incineration/ co-processing

7 Skimmed Oil

Process 35.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 To CHWIF for incineration or co-processing

8 Spent Solvents

Process 20.2 456.96

2543.04 3000 Recycled back to process or Sale to registered actual users

9 Spent Aluminium Chloride

Process Sch.-IIB-10

175.20

1524.8 1700 Sale to GPCB authorized end users

10

Spent Acetic Acid (35%)

Process Class C (Corrosive)

86.136

1063.864

1150 Sale to registered actual users

11

Spent acid Process Sch.-II B-15

0.00 1125.00 MT/ann

um

1125.00 MT/ann

um

Reused in manufacturing of Sodium Sulphate or disposal by sale to registered actual users.

12

Bleed Liquor

35.1 Scrubber

2 kl/day

1 kl/day 3 kl/day To be diverted to ETP for treatment

-

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc. (For HW management)

Membership No. 99 of CSWP, Vapi

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its -----

of 49


Page 20 of 49

disposal(MSW and others)



� Iso Propyl Alcohol, Methanol, Toluene, MTBE, Methyl Cyclohexane etc. is/will be used as solvents.

� Solvent recovery is/will be done through series of condensers having cooling water & chilled water. Solvent is/will be collected & stored properly by pump from jacketed receiver having chilled water.

� Approx. 85-95% solvent recovery is/will be achieved. � Recovered solvents is/will be reused back in the process or sold to actual users.


� All the pumps shall be mechanical seal type to avoid any leakage of solvent. � All the storage tank and day tank shall be connected to a vent system through chilled water

condensers to prevent loss of solvents in the atmosphere. � All the distillation column vents shall be connected to chilled water condensers for

maximum possible recovery of the solvents.



Observation:





• Total water consumption will be 324.5 KLD. Total wastewater generation will be 204 KLD.

After proposed expansion, the concentrated wastewater stream having high COD/high TDS

40 kl/day and will be sent to in house MEE. Condensate from MEE is/will be recycled back

for industrial use.

• The low COD/ low TDS streams along with the other streams such as washing, cooling tower

blow down, boiler blow down and scrubber is/ will be treated in in-house ETP consisting of

primary, secondary and tertiary treatment facilities and will be discharged into CETP for

further treatment.

• Natural gas or FO will be used as fuel for proposed boiler and thermopack.

• Alkali scrubber as APCM will be provided with reactor.



• The proposal is for expansion. Details of compliance of EC conditions, CCA conditions,

action taken by GPCB under various environmental laws, were discussed. It is noted that

unit has been served show cause notice, notice of direction and closure direction in a short

period. All the reasons for action by the GPCB were deliberated at length along with the

prevention measures for recurrence.

• Committee asked PP to address the basis of product group formation and accordingly

of 49


Page 21 of 49

address the environmental measures in context to the proposed quantum of production.

• As the location of the proposed unit is in GIDC, Vapi, pollution load of existing stream being

discharged after treatment to CETP Vapi and after proposed expansion the identical

parameters were deliberated and committee found that after expansion pollution load in

existing treated waste water stream increases from the existing scenario.

• Considering the increased load, PP was asked to maintain the existing pollution load and

submit revised treatability report.

• It is also deliberated to address the water consumption and waste water generation for the

proposed expansion keeping existing water consumption and measures adopted to reduce

the water consumption for the proposed expansion.

After deliberation, it was unanimously decided to ask PP to submit the following details and

to consider the proposal after submission of the same.

1. Revised treatability study after proposed expansion for existing waste water of 164 KLPD

being discharged to CETP and verify no increase in pollution laod from existing scenario.

2. Detailed Leak Detection and Repairing Programme with chemical properties of high vapor

pressure solvents with details of inventory, quantity received storage, consumption, handling

and recovery.

3. To revised hazardous waste management details mentioning source of generation and also

address detailed HBr and HCl generation as bleed liquor under the Haz. Waste Rules 2016.

4. To address measures taken to reduce water consumption for proposed product keeping

existing product scenario in view.

9. SIA/GJ/IND2/28796/2018 M/s. Aashray Chemo Pharma

Plot No: 6602, GIDC Estate, Ankleshwar, Bharuch District, Gujarat 393 002




• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/28796/2018 dated 07/09/2018

regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP report.


• This is an expansion unit and proposes for expansion of Synthetic Organic Chemicals

manufacturing as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Product Name CAS No. Quantity in MT/Month End-use of the

products Existing Proposed Ultimate

1

3-(dimethylamino)-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-methylpropan-1-one

37951-53-4 0.00 30.00 30.00

Used as Pharma

intermediate in pharmaceutica

2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]cyclohexanone hydrochloride

42036-65-7

of 49


Page 22 of 49

4-Amino-1,2,4-triazole 584-13-4 l industries.

1-[4-(3-chloropropoxy)-3-methoxyphenyl]ethanone

58113-30-7

2-[2-(piperazin-1-yl)ethoxy]ethanol 10226-30-9

6-chlorohexan-2-one 13349-82-1

2

1,6-bis(4-chlorophenylbiguanido)hexane 18472-51-0

0.00 20.00 20.00

1-(hydroxycyclohexyl)-(4-methoxyphenyl)acetonitrile

93413-76-4

4,4,4-trifluo-1-(4-methylphenyl)butane-1,3-dione

720-94-5

1-[4-(benzyloxy)phenyl]propan-1-one 4495-66-3

3

1-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine hydrochloride

5464-78-8

0.00 20.00 20.00

1-(4-methoxyphenyl)piperazine hydrochloride

38869-47-5

Methyl bromo(2-chlorophenyl)acetate 85259-19-4

Hydroxyacetic acid 79-14-1

4 2-(chlorophenyl-10H-phenothiazine 92-39-7 0.00 10.00 10.00

5

(RS)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexanone

1867-66-9

0.00 3.00 3.00

(R)-4-(1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl)benzene-1,2-diol

51-43-4

(RS)-4-(1-hydroxy-2-(isopropylamino)ethyl)benzene-1,2-diol

329-63-5

(R)-4-(2-amino-1-hydroxyethyl)benzene-1,2-diol

138-65-8

6

Formamidine acetate 3473-63-0

0.00 30.00 30.00 Phenyl Acetone 103-79-7

N-Acetyl 4(4-hydroxyphenyl) piprazine 67914-60-7

[1,2,4]trazolo[4,3-a]pyridine-3(2H)-one 6969-71-7

7 2:6 DCPNA 2683-43-4 2.50 -2.50 0.00

--

8 6 Chloro 2:4 DNA 3531-19-9 0.50 -0.50 0.00

9 2:6 DBPNA 827-94-1 0.50 -0.50 0.00

10 6 Bromo 2:4 DNA 1817-73-8 0.50 -0.50 0.00

11 Phenyl Hydrazine Semi Carbazide [MP] 57-56-7 90.00 -90.00 0.00

12 Ammonium Sulphate 7783-20-2 70.00 -70.00 0.00

Total 164.00 -51.00 113.00

BY - Product

1 KBr. Sol 0.00 89.00 89.00

By - Product 2 Triethylamine HCL 0.00 7.00 7.00

3 Pyrolidine 2 -5 dione 0.00 7.50 7.50

4 Na2s Sol. 0.00 12.00 12.00

of 49


Page 23 of 49

5 Magnesium and Hydrogen Bromide 0.00 14.00 14.00

6 AL(OH)3 0.00 16.00 16.00

Total 0.00 145.50 145.50


Notification 2006.


• The project proponent along with their expert / consultant M/s. Ramans Enviro Services Pvt.

Ltd attended the meeting and made presentation before the committee


Sr.

no.

Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 1.2

Proposed: 0.25

Total: 1.45

B Total Plot area

( sq. meter)

Existing:1000 Sq. m.

Proposed:0.00 Sq. m.

Total: 1000.00 Sq. m.

Green belt area,/Tree Plantation area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 10 Sq. m.

Proposed: 330.0.Sq. m.(Out

side of Premises)

Total:340 Sq. m.

C Employment generation Existing: 15

Proposed: @ 5

Total: @20

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply

(GIDC Bore well, Surface water, Tanker supply etc...)

GIDC water supply

Status of permission from the concern authority. Applied for additional water


Existing KLD



Remarks

(A) Domestic 0.640 0.00 0.640 Water source GIDC water supply

(B) Gardening 0.00 0.00 0.00

(C) Industrial

Process 1.650 6.285 7.939

Washing+ Scrubbing

of 49


Page 24 of 49

Boiler 0.100 0.00 0.100

Cooling 0.100 0.00 0.100

Others 0.00 0.00 0.00


Grand Total (A+B+C) 2.490 6.289 8.779

1) Total water requirement for the project: 8.779 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycle: 0.00 KLD

3) Total fresh water requirement: 8.77 KLD


Category Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 0.400 0.400 0.400 To septic Tank

(B) Industrial

Process 1.15 0.00 1.150 To CETP after

require primary

treatment

Washing

Boiler 0.0225 0.00 0.0225

Cooling 0.0225 0.00 0.0225

Others(Scrubbing

System) 0.00 3.600 3.600

To evaporator

within premises

Total Industrial

waste water 1.200 3.600 4.800

Note :

� 1.2 KLD (daily average) will be sent to ETL (As Per Valid CC&A).

� 3.6 KLD will evaporate within premises.



Existing : In House Primary Treatment Plant - @ 2.0 KLD

Proposed : In House Primary Treatment Plant - @ 2.0 KLD & The additional wastewater quantity @ 3.6 KLD will be evaporated in steam jacketed evaporator within premise.


Domestic: To septic Tank

Industrial:

� 1.2 KLD (daily average) will be sent to ETL (As Per Valid CC&A).

� 3.6 KLD will be evaporated in steam jacketed evaporator within

premises.


etc.


CETP of M/s ETL, Ankleshwar

of 49


Page 25 of 49


CETP of M/s ETL, Ankleshwar


We shall explore the possibility of recycle/reuse.

E Air


No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA

etc.

Existing & Proposed

-

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type

of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

Existing

1

Boiler (2000

kg/hr)

12 Natural

Gas

150

NM3/Day

SPM,

SO2

,NOx

Adequate

state Height

2 Hot air

Generator 12

Natural

Gas

150

NM3/Day

SPM,

SO2

,NOx

Adequate

state Height

Proposed

Existing system is adequate after expansion


Existing & Proposed

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height (meter)

Air Pollution

Control Measures

(APCM)

Existing

1 Reaction Vessel (no.1)

NH3 HCL HBr H2S SO2

9 Two stage Alkali Scrubber

Proposed

of 49


Page 26 of 49

2 Reaction Vessel (no.2)

NH3 HCL HBr H2S SO2

9 Two stage Alkali Scrubber


� Enclosed Processed

� Auto handling for charging Raw Materials

� Minimum joints/flanges

� Pumps with double mechanical seals

� Proper Ventilation

� PPE

F Hazardous waste


Rules 2016.

Existing & Proposed

i

Sr. no.

Type/Name of Hazardous waste

Source of generation


Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

Existing

Proposed

Total

1 Used oil

From Plant Machinery

5.1 0.01 0.01 0.01 Collection, storage, transportation and sold out to the registered Recyclers.

2 ETP Sludge

From ETP Plant

35.3 9.6 0.00 9.6 Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to authorized TSDF facility.

3 Discarded containers / liners/barrels

From Raw material and storage

33.1 14.4 0.00 14.4 Collection, storage and reused for disposal of waste /sold to recyclers.

4 Process Sludge

From Manufacturing Process

26.1 0.00 12.00 12.00 Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to authorized Site.

5 Spent acid From scrubbing system

26.3 0.00 624.0 624.0 Collection, Storage, Transportation and sold to end user having permission under rule-9.

6 Distillation Residue

From Distillation

36.1 0.00 60.0 60.0 Collection, Storage, Transportation and sent for co- processing in cement industries or sent to common incineration

of 49


Page 27 of 49

facility

7 Spent solvent

From Process

28.6 0.00 18.00 18.00 Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to CHWIF actual reuses.

8 Evaporator Salt

From Evaporator Plant

37.3 0.00 48.0 48.0 Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to authorized TSDF facility.

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc. TSDF : BEIL- Ankleshwar

CETP: ETL - Ankleshwer

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its

disposal (MSW and others)

No such wastes generate.



Sr. No. Solvent Name

Total Consumption

Kg/Month

Recovered MT/Month

Fresh MT/Month

% Recovery

1 Isopropyl alcohol 59.94 58.14 1.80 97.00

2 Acetone 34.94 33.54 1.40 96.00

3 Methanol 50.47 48.56 1.92 96.20

4 Toluene 28.78 27.86 0.92 96.80

5 Xylene 37.97 36.84 1.14 97.00

6 Butanol 46.14 44.80 1.34 97.10

7 Ethyleneglycol ethyl ether

9.35 8.99 0.36 96.20

8 Ethylene Dichloride 19.58 18.65 0.93 95.25

9 tetrahydrofuran 5.17 4.96 0.22 95.80

10 Phenyl Acetic Acid 20.40 19.38 1.02 95.00

11 Acetic Anhydride 15.80 15.17 0.63 96.00

12 2 Ethoxy Ethanol 4.50 4.32 0.18 96.00


• Enclosed Processed

• Minimum joints/flanges

• Pumps with double mechanical seals

• Minimum joints/flanges



Observation:






of 49


Page 28 of 49

After proposed expansion, 3.6 KLD effluent will be treated in primary ETP and then will be

evaporated in steam jacketed evaporator.

• 1.2 KLD effluent will be treated in ETP and will be sent to CETP of M/s ETL through tanker.

• Natural gas will be used as fuel for proposed boiler and hot air generator.

• Two stage alkali scrubber will be provided as APCM with reactors.



• It is an expansion proposal.

• Committee noted that PP has considered products that fall under the Haz. Waste Rules 2016

and accordingly asked to include the same as hazardous waste considering HWR 2016.

• For the proposed expansion, the treated waste will be evaporated in inhouse evaporator.

Details of evaporation capacity, its method of evaporation, salt generation if any was

discussed at length. Referring to the products and usages of solvents, PP was asked to

address solvent recovery.

Considering the above project details, after detailed discussion, the terms of reference (ToR)

were prescribed as below and as per the standard TOR for the Synthetic Organic Chemical

projects recommended by SEAC vide letter no. EIA-10-GEN-21/1480 dated 14/09/2017 and

approved by SEIAA in its 12th meeting dated 16/09/2017 for the EIA study to be done

covering 10 Km radial distance from the project boundary.

1. Compliance of MoEFCC’s OM dated 01/05/2018 regarding “Corporate Environment

Responsibility” (CER). Fund allocation for Corporate Environment Responsibility (CER) shall be

made as per MoEFCC’s O.M. No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated 01/05/2018 for various activities

therein. The details of fund allocation and activities for CER shall be incorporated in EIA/EMP

report.

2. Segregation of waste water streams based on characteristics and its proper management keeping

in view direction under section 18 (1) (b) of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) act,

1974 issued by CPCB regarding compliance of CETP.

3. PP shall address spent solvent with details of storage, handling and re-use under the Hazardous

and other Waste (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

4. Leak Detection and Repairing Programme (LDAR) for all the volatile organic solvent proposed for

use in-house with detailed chemical properties including vapor pressure. LDAR shall endeavor

prevention of losses of solvents to the best minimum extent.

5. Explore the use of renewable energy to the maximum extent possible. Details of provisions to

make the project energy-efficient through energy efficient devices and adoption of modes of

alternative eco-friendly sources of energy like solar water heater, solar lighting etc. Measures

proposed for energy conservation.

6. To address all the by-product mentioned under the Hazardous Waste Rules 2016.

7. Detailed design of evaporator with capacity, Details of quality and quantity of treated

of 49


Page 29 of 49

waste water to be evaporated and its feasibility and adequacy for proposed evaporation

of treated waste water.

The TOR prescribed as above and as per the standard TOR approved by SEIAA and the model

ToRs available in the MoEFCC’s sector specific EIA Manual for ‘Synthetic Organic Chemical

Industry’ shall be considered as generic TORs for preparation of the EIA report in addition to all the

relevant information as per the generic structure of EIA given in Appendix III in the EIA Notification,

2006.

The project proponent shall have to apply for Environmental clearance through online portal http://environmentclearance.nic.in/ along with final EIA report.

10. SIA/GJ /IND2/28497/2018

M/s. MAHANSARIA TYRES PVT. LTD Plot No. 3551 (B), HBS Pharma SEZ Pvt.

Ltd., GIDC Estate- Panoli, Tal :

Ankleshwar, District: Bharuch- 394116,

Gujarat

Obtain clarification for proposed project

Project / Activity No.: No category

Project status: New

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ /IND2/28497/2018 dated

07/09/2018 regarding Clarification for EIA Notification 2006 is applicable to proposed

project of all types of Automobile tyres manufacturing.

Referring to the product profile, committee noted that the proposal does not attract provision

of EIA Notification 2006 and hence unanimously decided to recommend for delisting of the

proposal as it does not attract provision of EIA Notification 2006.

11. SIA/GJ/IND2/28358/2018 M/s. VIHITA BIO CHEM PVT. LTD Plot No. 304/A, GIDC Industrial Estate, Ankleshwar, Tal-Ankleshwar, Dist- Bharuch- 393002, Gujarat




• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no.

SIA/GJ/IND2/28358/2018 dated 03/09/2018 regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for

preparation of EIA/EMP report.



below:

Sr. no.

Name of the Products

CAS no.

Remarks Quantity (MT/Month) End-use of the

products Existing Proposed Total

of 49


Page 30 of 49

1 Veratric Acid 93-07-2

Group A 5.00 -- 5.00

Pharma Intermediate

2 Dimethyl Formamide - Dimethyl Acetal

4637-24-5

Pharma Intermediate

3 Guanidine Nitrate 506-93-

4 Group B

200.00 -- 200.00 Pharma

Intermediate

4 Veratrol 91-16-7

Group C: Either indi.

Or total production of Sr. No. 4 to 18 shall not exceed

10 MT/M

10.00 -- 10.00

Pharma Intermediate

5 Sesamol 533-31-

3 Pharma

Intermediate

6 3 – Hydroxy – 4 - Methoxy Cinnamaldehyde

110037-35-9

Pharma Intermediate

7 5 - Nitro Vanillin 6635-20-7

Pharma Intermediate

8 3, 4 – Dihydroxy – 5 - Nitro Benzaldehyde

116313-85-0

Pharma Intermedi te

9 4 - Chloro – 4 - Hydroxy Benzophenone

42019-78-3

Pharma Intermediate

10 4 - Fluoro Acetophenone

403-42-9

Pharma Intermediate

11 4 - Bromo Acetophenone

99-90-1 Pharma

Intermediate

12 2 – Chloro - 3, 4 - Dihydroxy Acetophenone

99-40-1 Pharma

Intermediate

13 Isovanilline 621-59-

0 Pharma

Intermediate

14 2 - (2 - Methoxy Phenoxy) Ethyl Amine HCl

64464-07-9

Pharma Intermediate

15 2 - (2 - Methoxy Phenoxy) Ethyl Amine

1836-62-0

Pharma Intermediate

16 2’ – Bromo – 4 - Methoxy Acetophenone

2632-13-5

Pharma Intermediate

17

2, 3, 4, 5 – Bis – O - (1 - Methylethylidene) – Beta – D - Fructopyranose

106881-35-0

Pharma Intermediate

18 4 - Hydroxy Carbazole

52602-39-8

Pharma Intermediate

19 Sodium Sulphate 7757- Group C: 81.83 -- 81.83 Pharma

of 49


Page 31 of 49

82-6 Either indi. Or total

production of Sr. No. 19 to 21 shall not exceed 81.83 MT/M

Intermediate

20 Ammonium Sulphate

7783-20-2

Pharma Intermediate

21 Poly Aluminium Chloride

1327-41-9

Pharma Intermediate

22

Various new Product developed by in-house R & D

-- Group C 1.00 -- 1.00 Pharma

Intermediate

23

Phenyl – 2 - Hydroxy 4, 5 - Dimethoxy Benzoate

877997-98-3

Part 1: Either indi.

Or total production of Sr. No. 23 to 28 shall not exceed 8

MT/M

-- 8.00 8.00

Pharma Intermediate

24 2 - Hydroxy 4, 5 - Dimethoxy Benzoic Acid

5722-93-0

Pharma Intermediate

25 2, 4, 5 - Trimethoxy Benzoic Acid

490-64-2

Pharma Intermediate

26

5 – Bromo – 2 – Chloro – 4 – Ethoxy Benzophenone

461432-22-4

Pharma Intermediate

27 5 – Bromo – 2 – Chloro Benzoic Acid

21739-92-4

Pharma Intermediate

28

Various new Product developed by in-house R & D

-- -- -- 2.00 2.00 Pharma

Intermediate

29 2, 6 - Dimethyl Phenoxy Acetic Acid

13335-71-2

Part 2: Either indi.

Or total production of Sr. No. 29 to 30 shall not exceed

25 MT/M

-- 25.00 25.00

Pharma Intermediate

30 2 - Methyl 2 - Oxazoline

1120-64-5

Pharma Intermediate

Total 297.83 35.00 332.83


Notification 2006.


• The project proponent along with their expert /consultant M/s. Earthcare Enviro Solution Pvt.

of 49


Page 32 of 49



Sr.

no.

Particulars Details


(Rs. in Crores):

Existing: Rs. 3.5256 Crore

Proposed: 2.00 Crore

Total: 5.5256 Crore

B Total Plot area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 3900.00 Sq. m.

Proposed : --

Total: 3900.00 Sq. m.

Green belt area

( sq. meter)

Existing: 160.00 Sq. m.


Total: 1250.00 Sq. m.

C Employment generation Existing: 54 (Male- 51, Female-03)

Proposed: 36 (Male- 34, Female-02)

Total: 90 (Male- 85, Female- 05)

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well,

Surface water, Tanker supply etc...) GIDC, Ankleshwar

Status of permission from the concern

authority. The unit has already connection for the

existing production facility.


Existing KLD



Remarks

(A) Domestic 1.50 2.50 4.00 --

(B) Gardening 2.00 3.00 5.00 --

(C) Industrial

Process 3.65 12.30 15.95 --

Washing 2.35 0.40 2.75 --

Boiler 6.00 4.00 10.00 --

Cooling 5.00 4.00 9.00 --

Others (Scrubber) -- 3.00 3.00


Grand Total (A+B+C)

20.50 29.20 49.70

1) Total water requirement for the project: 49.70 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycled: NIL

3) Total fresh water requirement: 49.70 KLD

of 49


Page 33 of 49


Category Existing

KLD

Proposed

(Additional)

KLD

Total after

Expansion

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 1.00 2.00 3.00 --

(B) Industrial

Process 3.40 13.00 16.40 --

Washing 2.35 0.30 2.65 --

Boiler 0.10 0.10 0.20 --

Cooling 0.15 0.10 0.25 --

Others (Scrubber) -- 0.80 0.80 --

Total Industrial

waste water 6.00 14.30 20.30


[In-house ETP (Primary, Secondary, Tertiary), MEE, Stripper, Spray Dryer, STP etc.

Existing: � In-house ETP having primary treatment is installed.

Proposed:

� In-house ETP (capacity 36.00 KLD) (Primary Treatment)


Domestic: Septic tank / Soak pit system.

Industrial: Industrial effluent generated from existing and proposed manufacturing

process and other ancillary operation shall be allowed into in-house ETP for

primary treatment. Primary treated water will be sent to CETP (M/s. ETL,

Ankleshwar).


etc.


� Name of CETP – M/s. ETL.


(For waste water treatment)

Unit has membership of CETP of M/s .ETL.


of 49


Page 34 of 49


[Source of reuse & application area]

Total reuse - No Reuse

Source of waste water for

reuse with quantity in KLD

Application area with

quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding feasibility

to reuse i.e. w/w

characteristics (COD, BOD,

TDS etc.)

-- -- --

-

E Air


No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

Existing & Proposed

-

SR. No.

Source of emission

With Capacity

Stack

Height (meter)

Type of Fuel

Quantity of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants


Measures

(APCM)

Existing

1 Industrial Boiler

(Capacity: 600 Kg/Hr) 11.0

Natural Gas

600 m3/day PM

SO2

NOX

Adequate stack height is

provided 2 Thermopack

(3 Lacs KCal/hr) 11.0

Natural Gas

0.60 SCM/Day

Proposed

of 49


Page 35 of 49

3 Steam Boiler

(2 TPH) 11.0

Natural Gas

1000 SCM/Day

PM

SO2

NOX

Adequate stack height

will be provided

4 Thermopack

(5 Lacs Kcal/hr) 11.0

Natural Gas

200 SCM/Day

5 D.G Set (Stand By) 250 KVA

5.0 HSD 35 Lit/Hr

-


Existing & Proposed

-

Sr. no.

Specific Source of emission (Name of

the Product & Process)

Type of emission

Stack/Vent Height (meter)

Air Pollution Control Measures

(APCM)

Existing

--

Proposed

1 Reaction Vessels – 1 NH3

12 m Two Stage Water Scrubber followed by Acid Scrubber 2 Reaction Vessels - 2

SO2

HCl


� Sources of fugitive emissions will be from raw material storage area, handling of chemicals,

manufacturing process and from vehicle movement on internal road.

� To minimize fugitive emission, powder material will be allowed in a vessel through closed loop

while liquid material will be charged through pipeline.

� Transportation of raw materials & products will be carried out by trolley within premises and

minimum manual material handling will be carried, so the fugitive emission due to process activity

and material handling will be negligible.

F Hazardous waste


Rules 2016.

Existing & Proposed

of 49


Page 36 of 49

i

Sr. no.

Type/ Name of Hazardous waste

Specific Source of generation (Name of the Activity, Product etc.)


Quantity (MT/Annum)

Management

of HW Existing Proposed Total

1. ETP Sludge

Effluent Treatment

Plant

35.3 (Sch. I)

72.00 48.00 120.00

Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal at TSDF site – for secured landfill

2.

Empty Barrels / Containers / Liners Contami-nated with Hazardous Chemicals / Wastes

Raw Material & Product

33.1 (Sch. I)

14.40 15.60 30.00

Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal by selling to registered recycler approved by GPCB/CPCB OR reuse within premises.

3. Spent Solvents

Process (Product No. 23 &

27)

28.6 (Sch. I)

960.00 327.36 1287.36

Reuse OR disposal by sell out to authorized users who is having authorization with valid CCA and rule 9 permission to receive this waste

4.

Concen-tration or Evaporation Residues (Distillation residue)

Process (Product No. 30)

20.3 (Sch. I)

1.20 118.20 119.40

Collection, Storage, Transportation and Disposal for co-processing/incineration

5. Used or Spent Oil

Thermo-pack &

D. G. Set

5.1 (Sch. I)

0.60 0.80 1.40

Reuse as lubricant in plant & machinery OR Disposal by selling to authorized Re-

of 49


Page 37 of 49

Refiners/recycler.

6.

Sodium Bromide Solution (50-55%)

Process (Product No. 23 &

24)

28.4 (Sch. I)

-- 1409.40 1409.40

Collection, Storage, Transportation & Disposal by selling to Authorized end user as per Haz. Waste Rule-9 and after getting prior permission from GPCB

7.

AlCl3

Solution (50-55%)

Process (Product No. 26)

28.4 (Sch. I)

-- 3760.90 3760.90


8. Ammonium Sulphate (60-70%)

Scrubber 28.4

(Sch. I) -- 1621.50 1621.50


9. Inorganic Salt

Scrubber 35.1

(Sch. I) -- 2.00 2.00

Collection, Storage, Transportation & Disposal at TSDF site for landfilling

ii Membership details of TSDF, CHWIF etc.

(For HW management)

Unit has taken membership of M/s. BEIL.

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal(MSW and others)

Sr. No.

Type of Waste Source of

Generation Category of

Waste Disposal

1. Domestic Waste Employees working MSW Collected in separate

of 49


Page 38 of 49

(Food waste, Plastic, Paper etc.)

in the premises bin and disposed to bin of GIDC.

2.

Industrial Waste

(Glass wool [Insulating Material, Scrap])

Steam Pipe & Vessels

ISW Sell to local scrap vendor

3. Industrial Waste

(Wooden pellets)

From Raw Material & Product storage area

ISW Sell to local scrap vender



� In-house solvent recovery plant will be installed and recovered solvent will be again reused in

process OR Job work at offsite distillation units engaged in distillation of spent solvent.


� VOCs generation will be from storage and usage of raw materials.

� VOC analysers will be provided to detect any solvent leakages during storage and handling.



Observation:






After proposed expansion, Industrial effluent generated from existing and proposed

manufacturing process and other ancillary operation shall be allowed into in-house ETP for

primary treatment. Primary treated water will be sent to CETP (M/s. ETL, Ankleshwar).

• Natural gas will be used as fuel for proposed boiler and thermopack.

• Two stage water scrubber followed by acid scrubber as APCM will be provided with reactors.



• It is an expansion proposal from existing production of 305 MTPM to 340 MTPM with

addition of 35 MTPM of new quantity. It is noted that entire quantity of treated waste water

from 6 KLPD to 20.30 KLPD after expansion is proposed to be discharged to CETP of ETL.

PP was asked to pursue zero liquid discharge for the additional quantity of treated waste

water in place of discharging it to CETP of ETL.

After deliberation, it was unanimously decided to ask PP to submit the following details and

to consider the proposal after submission of the same.

1. Revised proposal for pursuing zero liquid discharge for the additional quantity of treated

waste water due to additional quantity of products with adequate EMP.

of 49


Page 39 of 49

2. Details of quantity and quality of existing and proposed treated waste water streams

12. SIA/GJ/IND/29024/2018 M/s. Sanghi Industries Limited

Survey No. 153 & 154, Village – Mora,

Taluka – Choryasi, District-Surat, Gujarat -

394510

TOR

Project / Activity No.: 3(b)

Project status: New

• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no. SIA/GJ/IND/29024/2018

dated 27/09/2018 regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP

report.


• This is Standalone Grinding Unit (2.0 Million TPA) with bulk & bag packing plant as tabulated

below:

S.

No.

Name of the

Products

CAS no. /CI no. Quantity

MT/Month

End-use of products

1 Cement 65997-15-1. 1,67,000 For infrastructural growth

• The project falls under Category B of project activity 3(b) as per the schedule of EIA

Notification 2006.


• The project proponent along with their expert /consultant M/s. Earthcare Enviro Solution Pvt.



S.

no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores): Rs. 282.28 Crores

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter) 53,000 Sq. m.

Green belt area ( sq. meter) 17,500 Sq. m.

C Employment generation

Construction phase: 500 Nos.

Operation Phase: 280 Nos.

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well, Surface

water, Tanker supply etc...)

Local Body/ Bore well/GIDC

Status of permission from the concern authority. -


Category Quantity Remarks

of 49


Page 40 of 49

KLD

(A) Domestic 15.0 -

(B) Gardening 45 (25 KLD fresh water + 20 KLD

recycled= Total 45

(C) Industrial

Process 0.0

Washing 0.0

Boiler 0.0

Cooling 150

Others (Dust Suppression) 68 58 KLD from blow down + 10

KLD Fresh water

Industrial Total 218

Total (A + B + C)

278 200 KLD fresh water

requirement

1) Total water requirement for the project: 278 KLD

2) Quantity to be recycled: 78 KLD

3) Total fresh water requirement: 200 KLD


Category Waste water

KLD

Remarks

(A) Domestic 8

(B) Industrial

Process 0.0

Washing 0.0

Boiler 0.0

Cooling 70.0 Blow down

80.0 KLD evaporation loss, blow

down water will be used for dust

suppression and Greenbelt

Others -

Total Industrial waste water 70

Total [A + B] 78 No waste water will be generated.

Blow down water will be used for

dust suppression and greenbelt.

-

of 49


Page 41 of 49

iv Treatment facility within premises with capacity


No ETP will be required


Domestic: Treated STP water will be reused for greenbelt

Industrial: No effluent will be generated

vi In case of Common facility (CF) like CETP, Common Spray dryer, Common MEE etc. ,

Name of CF

Not applicable


(For waste water treatment)

Not applicable


viii Reuse/Recycle details (KLD)

Total reuse 78 KLD

Source of waste water for

reuse with quantity in

KLD

Application area with

quantity in KLD

Remarks regarding

feasibility to reuse i.e.

w/w characteristics (COD,

BOD, TDS etc.)

Cooling tower blow down

water

70.0 -

of 49


Page 42 of 49

Domestic water after

treatment

8.0 -

E Air


No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

-

Sr.

no.

Source of

emission

With

Capacity

Stack

Height

(meter)

Type of

Fuel

Quantity

of Fuel

MT/Day

Type of

emissions

i.e. Air

Pollutants

Air Pollution

Control

Measures

(APCM)

1

Cement Mill

(9,00,000

m3/hr)

55

Coal/

Lignite/

Pet

coke

200 SPM, SO2,

NOx

3 Nos. Bag

House and

7 Nos. of de-

dusting bag

filter

2.

Coal Mill

(10,000

m3/hr)

30

3.

Hot Air

Generator

(10,000

m3/hr)

30

-


Not Applicable as this is cement grinding unit

-

Sr.

no.

Specific Source

of emission

(Name of the

Product &

Process)

Type of

emission

Stack/Vent

Height (meter)


Measures

(APCM)

1 - - - -

2. - - - -

-

Iii Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

As below:

Source:

• PM10 and PM2.5 is considered as major air pollutants from this source. No

of 49


Page 43 of 49

process gas emission will be generated.

• The unloading area of clinker, gypsum, fly ash and fly ash storage silo, clinker grinding mill, cements silos and packing machines are the main areas where dust is likely to be generated.

Mitigation:

• Vehicles with valid PUC will be used for the transportation of materials and

equipment.

• The emission from these sources would be fugitive in nature and bag filters are proposed as APCM to control fugitive emission.

• Concrete road has been/shall be developed.

• Regular water sprinkling is being/ will be done to avoid dust generation from

transportation.

• Closed conveyer belt for limestone (from captive mine to plant) is being used to

control the dust emission.

• Transportation vehicles will be covered with tarpaulin sheet while transporting

materials.

• Proper loading/unloading procedures will be carried out.

• Carry out regular sweeping of roads to minimize emissions.

• Provided paved roads and concrete flooring at Cement mills, packing plant and

coal yard area.

F Hazardous wastes


Rules 2016.

i

Sr.

no.

Type/Name of

Hazardous

waste

Specific

Source of

generation

(Name of

the

Activity,

Product

etc.)

Category and

Schedule as

per HW

Rules.

Quantity

(MT/Annum)

Management of

HW

1. Used Oil*

From

machinery

and other

equipment

1/5.1 60 Secondary

lubrication /

send to Own

Clinker plant

under AFR.

ii Membership details of TSDF,

CHWIF etc. (For HW management)

100% recycle in process

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste &

its disposal (MSW and others)

S.

N

Waste Qty in

TPA

End use /

Disposal

of 49


Page 44 of 49

o.

1. Dust collected

from APCM

450 Totally recycled

in process.

2. Ash generated

from HGG

18000 100 % recycled

in the plant in

PPC


Not applicable

I Types of solvents, Details of Solvent recovery, % recovery. reuse of recovered Solvents

• Not applicable

Ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures

• Not applicable



Observation:

• This proposal is for new standalone cement grinding unit with bulk and bag packing unit.

• Total water consumption will be 278 KLD. Total wastewater generation will be 70 KLD. total

industrial effluent will be completely reused back in process.

• Coal/lignite/petcoke will be used as fuel for proposed project.

• Bag house and dedusting bag filter as APCM will be provided.



• The proposal is new for clinker grinding for production of 2 MMTPA. It is noted that bag

house for clinker grinding unit and adequate pollution control measures are proposed by the

unit.

• All transportation from point of landing of clinker and other bulk raw materials will be done

through covered vehicles and will be stored in Silos.

• Committee asked PP to explore to use ETP waste of chemical industries having gypsum as

alternative raw materials.

• A detail of measures to curb fugitive emission due to storage of coal was discussed at

length.

Considering aforementioned project details and environmental mitigation measures, it was

unanimously decided to recommend the proposal for grant of TOR with following specific

TOR. It was also decided to ask PP to conduct public hearing as per the provision of EIA

of 49


Page 45 of 49

Notification 2006 and submit EIA for appraisal.

• Terms of reference (ToR) were prescribed as below for the EIA study to be done covering 10

Km radial distance from the project boundary.

1. Alternative site analysis and justification for selection of the present site based on the pros &

cons of various alternatives with technical reasons including the likely impacts of the air

pollution (both flue gas emission and fugitive emissions) vis-à-vis wind direction, noise

impacts due to the proposed activities, etc. for the proposed project.

2. Project site specific details and site suitability with respect to siting criteria / guidelines. The

sitespecific details should include distance of the project site from the nearest (1) Village (2)

Water Body: River / Creek / Nallah / Reservoir / Pond / Canal (3) NationalHighway (4) State

Highway (5) Railwayline(6) Heritage site (7) NationalPark / Wild LifeSanctuary / Biosphere

Reserve / Conservation Reserve (8) Reserve Forest / Protected Forest (9) Any other eco-

sensitive areas like wetland, mangroves, coral reefs, migratory route of wild animals, turtle

nesting ground etc.

3. Land possession documents and NA order.

4. Need for the proposed project along with justification for selecting the proposed product and

unit size.

5. Gazette Notification issued by the State Government indicating location of the project in

notified industrial area should be included.

6. Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, its availability

and optimization.

7. Layout plan clearly demarcating various units (plants / utilities), green belt and open path

around the periphery / plants for easy movement of emergency vehicles.

8. Demarcation of proposed facilities for expansion in lay out of the existing premises.

9. Details of exact production capacity per month in terms of each kind of cement i.e. Ordinary

Portland Cement [OPC] / Pozzolona Portland Cement [PPC] etc.

10. Detailedmanufacturing operations along with mass balance, process flow diagram describing

each unit, its processes / operations etc.

11. Strategyfor the implementation of the CleanerProductionactivities along with a write up on

possibility of using high calorific hazardouswastes in kiln and commitment regarding use of

hazardous waste in the process.

12. Explore possibilities of reuse / recycle and other cleaner production options for reduction of

wastes & emissions along with commitment of the management on futuristic development /

implementation for the same.

13. Water requirement, its source and permission obtained from the concerned authority for

supply of requisite quantity of water to the project. In case of ground water abstraction,

status of permission from the CGWA along with study report on geo-hydrology of the area

and impacts of ground water abstraction.

14. Explore the possibilities of getting surface water supply instead of depending on the ground

water source for the proposed project.

of 49


Page 46 of 49

15. Detailed report for storm water drainage, management & disposal, measures proposed to

avoid contamination of the storm water as well as restricting and isolating the contaminated

storm water not allowing it to flow out of the premises.

16. Water balance diagram (including reuse-recycle, if any). Efforts for water conservation.

17. Details on raw materials, source, storage and handling within the premises. Mode of

transportation of raw materials and products as well as measures proposed for preventing

fugitive emission during transportation.

18. Type, quantity and quality of fuels required. A confirmed fuel linkage / copy of MoU for supply

of fuel.

19. List the sources of air pollution including process emissions as well as fugitive emissions

along with the mitigation measures. Air pollution control measures (APCM) along with its

design details, efficiency, inlet and outlet pollutant concentrations, etc. and stack height. The

APCM shall be designed to achieve particulate matter emission below 50 mg/Nm3 at the

stack outlet and it’s design should be got approved by the reputed institute.

20. An action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources.

21. Provision of the online monitoring system on stacks for monitoring of pollutants, with an

arrangement to reflect monitored data on company’s server that can be accessed by the

GPCB on real time basis.

22. In case, hazardous waste is proposed to be charged in kilns, details on type of waste, its

characteristics and monitoring of emissions of gases, heavy metals, VOCs, dioxins and

furans.

23. Details of solid / hazardous wastes generation, its composition, handling, storage, utilization,

disposal etc.

24. Details of all possible sources of noise pollution, its magnitude and mitigation measures

including engineering and other controls proposed tocontrol it.

25. Details of heat emission sources from the proposed project and proposed mitigation

measures.

26. One season site-specific meteorological data including temperature, relative humidity, hourly

wind speed and directionand rainfall shall be provided.

27. One season (except monsoon) ambient air quality monitoring at minimum 6 locations within

the study area along with dates of monitoring. Parameters to be considered shall be in

accordance with the revised national ambient air quality standards notified in November,

2009 and other project specific parameters. The monitoring stations shall take into account

the predominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved

forests. There should be at least one monitoring station in the upwind direction and one

monitoring station at / near the location where maximum ground level concentration is likely

to occur.

28. Prediction of ground level concentration of pollutants by air quality modeling based on site-

specific meteorological features. Details of the model used and the input parameters used for

modelling shall be provided. The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location map

showing location of project site, habitation, sensitive receptors, etc. The wind roses should

of 49


Page 47 of 49

also be shown on this map.

29. Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances from the project site to be

demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).

30. Land use pattern of the study area based on satellite imagery / field investigation including

location specific sensitivities such as national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries,

prime agricultural land etc., for the study area. If any incompatible landuse attributes fall

within the study area, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and

significance).

31. The baseline data shall also be collected for other components of environment viz. noise,

water, land, and biology and socio-economic.

32. Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and quality,

species, diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance, etc. In case of

scheduled fauna, conservation measures should be proposed.

33. A detailed study to assess the wildlife habitats, their migration route, etc. and measures to

mitigate impacts of the proposed activities.

34. While identifying the likely impacts, also include following for analysis of significance and

required mitigation measures: (i) Impacts due to transportation of raw materials and end

products on road network (ii) Impacts on surface water, soil and groundwater (iii) Impact on

drainage of the area and the surroundings (iv) Impacts due to air pollution (v) Major sources

of noise and its impacts (vi) Impacts due to fugitive emissions (viii) Impact on health of

workers due to proposed project activities.

35. Proposal to construct approach road from the main road to the company premises and to

maintain it in good conditionfor reducing fugitive emission due to transportation of vehicles.

36. Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc., to

the workers during construction and operation phase.

37. Environmental Monitoring Program for operational phase of project including (i) Monitoring

programme for pollution control at source, (ii) Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment

for the relevant parameters – air quality, groundwater, surface water, etc. to assess impact

during operational phase of the project, (iii) Specific programme for medical surveillance and

monitoring of working environment (especially for cement / silica dust) as per Gujarat

Factories Rules (iv) Details of in-house monitoring capabilities and details of outsourcing to

other agencies if proposed for conducting monitoring.

38. Environmental Management Plan including (i) Measures to mitigate adverse impacts along

with item-wise cost of its implementation (capital and recurring costs), (ii) Administrative and

technical organizational structure for implementation of mitigation measures and proposed

post-project Environmental Monitoring Program, (iii) Allocation of resources and

responsibilities for plan implementation.

39. A tabular chartfor the issues raised in public hearing/consultation and commitment of

the project proponent to the same. An action plan addressing the issues raised and

the necessary allocation of funds for the same.

40. Action plan for the greenbelt development in accordance to CPCB published guidelines. The

of 49


Page 48 of 49

details should include types &number of species, width of plantations, areaunder green belt

development [with map], planning schedule, budgetary outlay, etc.

41. Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible

accident scenario along with risk contours plotted on the plant layout clearly showing the

activities that would be affected in case of an accident taking place.

42. Details on the proposed safeguard measures, fire control plan, and on-site and off-site

emergency management plans.

43. Proposal for CSR activities most useful in the area along with time bound action plan and

cost.

44. Detailed schemefor surface / roof top rain water harvesting and ground water recharge shall

beincorporated. In case of ground water abstraction, annual abstraction quantity should be

compensated by equal amount of ground water recharge. The details should include

scientific calculations based on rainfall, catchment area, runoff / recharge coefficients,

percolation rate, duration of recharge etc. Before recharging the surface run off, pre-

treatment must be done to remove suspended matter / oil & grease. Location of recharge

percolation wells should be demarcated on layout plan.

45. Plan forcompliance to the CREP guidelines.

46. (a) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of

Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

47. (b). Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to

bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms /

conditions ? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

48. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the

environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions. Details of this

system may be given.

49. Does the company have a system of reporting of non compliances / violations of

environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or

stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA Report.

50. Certificate of accreditation issued by the NABET, QCI to the environmental consultant should

be incorporated in the EIA Report.

51. PP shall explore using gypsum as ARF (Alternative Raw Material/ Fuel) produced by

chemical industries from process/ETP.

52. A tabular chart with index for point-wise compliance of above TORs.

The TOR prescribed as above and the model ToRs available in the MoEFCC’s sector specific EIA Manual for

‘Cement Industry’ shall be considered as generic TORs for preparation of the EIA report in addition to all the

relevant information as per the generic structure of EIA given in Appendix III in the EIA Notification, 2006.

The draft EIA report shall be submitted to the Gujarat Pollution Control Board for conducting the

public consultation process as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006.

• The project proponent shall have to apply for Environmental clearance through online portal

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/ along with final EIA report.

of 49


Page 49 of 49

.Validity of ToR:

• The ToRs prescribed for the project will be valid for a period of three years for submission of

EIA & EMP report. ToR will lapse after three years from date of issue.

• The period of validity could be extended for a maximum period of one year provided an

application is made by the applicant to the Regulatory Authority, at least three months before

the expiry of valid period together with an updated Form-I, based on proper justification and also

recommendation of the SEAC.

Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair and the Members.

Minutes approved by:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC 2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

4. Shri. R. J. Shah, Member, SEAC

5. Shri Rajesh I Shah, Member, SEAC

6. Shri A.K.Muley, Member, SEAC

minutes of the 445 meeting of the state level expert ... minutes of the 445th i.pdfpage 1 of 49 445...

Documents