miriam okun presentation

Upload: recsco2

Post on 07-Apr-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    1/19

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    2/19

    6/17/20

    Growth Relative to 2000

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100Year

    FractionalChange

    Cons tant Growth 1.6% Plus Population Growth to 10 billion Clos ing the Gap at 2%

    E ne rg y i nte ns ity d ro p 1 %/yr E ne rg y In te ns ity d ro p 1 .5 %/yr En erg y In te ns ity d ro p 2 % p er ye ar

    Constant growth

    Plus Population Growth

    Closing the Gap

    1% energy intensity reduction

    1.5% energy intensity reduction

    2.0% energy intensity reduction

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    1900 2000 2100 2200

    Continued

    Exponential

    Growth

    Constant

    Emissions

    after 2010

    100%

    of 2010 rate

    33%

    10%

    0%Preindustrial Level

    280 ppm

    Hazardous Level

    450 ppm

    Hazardous Level

    450 ppm

    Stabilize CO2 concentration not CO2 emissions

    CO2

    (ppm)

    year

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    3/19

    6/17/20

    The Mismatch

    in CarbonSources and

    Sinks

    43

    12

    5

    1800-

    2000

    Fossil Carbon

    Consumption to date

    180ppm

    increase in

    the air 30% of

    the Ocean

    acidified30%

    increase in

    Soil Carbon

    50%increase

    inbiomass

    Net Zero Carbon Economy

    CO2extractionfrom air

    Permanent &safe

    disposal

    CO2 fromconcentrated

    sources

    Capture from power

    plants, cement, steel,refineries, etc.

    Geological StorageMineral carbonate disposal

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    4/19

    6/17/20

    Separate Sources from

    SinksAir Extraction cancompensate for CO2emissions anywhere fromanytime (historicalemissions)

    Art Courtesy Stonehaven CCS, Montreal

    Leave existing infrastructure intact

    Retain quality transportation fuels

    Eliminate shipping of CO2

    Open remote sites for CO2 disposal Enable C-cycling with low cost electricity

    Act as insurance against leakage

    REDUCE atmospheric CO2 concentrations

    CO2

    1 m3of Air40 moles of gas, 1.16 kg

    wind speed 6 m/s

    0.015 moles of CO2

    produced by 10,000 J ofgasoline

    2

    20 J2

    mv

    Volumes are drawn to scale

    CO2 Capture from Air Can it be done?

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    5/19

    6/17/20

    Wind area that

    carries 22 tonsof CO2per year

    Wind area thatcarries 10 kW

    0.2 m2

    for CO2capture 80 m2

    for Wind Energy

    How much wind?(6m/sec)

    50 cents/ton of CO2for contacting

    Wind energy Air capture

    artists rendering

    Air collector reduces net CO2emissions much more thanequally sized windmill

    Wind energy~20 J/m3

    CO2 combustionequivalent in air

    10,000 J/m3

    Passive contactingof the air isinexpensive

    Wikipedia picture

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    6/19

    6/17/20

    Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide

    Air is rich in CO2 air collector is small

    Energetics is very similar to fluestack scrubbing

    G = RT log P

    Produce CO2 not CO2 free air

    Counterintuitive Result: Air capture is not much more difficult thanflue gas scrubbing

    CO2

    CO2 in 1 m3 of air

    CO2 could be made from 10,000J of gasoline

    Wind energy is 20J

    -30

    -25

    -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    100 1000 10000 100000

    CO2 Partial Pressure (ppm)

    BindingEnergy(kJ/mole)

    airPower plant

    350K300K

    Thermodynamic Requirement

    Flue Gas Scrubbing Air Capture

    artists rendering

    Sorbent regeneration slightlymore difficult for air capturethan for flue gas scrubbers

    Dominant costs are

    similar for air capture

    and flue gas scrubbing

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    7/19

    6/17/20

    Evolution of Air Capture-A First Attempt

    Air contactor:2Na(OH) + CO2 Na2 CO3

    Calciner:CaCO3CaO+CO2

    Ion exchanger:

    Na2CO3 + Ca(OH)2 2Na(OH) + CaCO3

    After Initial Work atLos Alamos and Columbia

    GRT is to demonstrate air capture inTucson

    Allen Wright

    Gary Comer

    Deliver proof of principle

    KSL joined the company

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    8/19

    6/17/20

    Choice of Sorbent

    Lower Binding Energy

    Easier Regeneration

    Fast Uptake

    Carbonate/bicarbonate vs. Hydroxide/Carbonate Swing:

    A matter of energy and kinetics

    Solids vs. Liquids: A matter of surface area

    Anionic Exchange ResinsSolid carbonate solution

    Quaternary amines form strong-base resin

    GRT photo

    Positive ions fixed to polymer matrix Negative ions are free to move

    Negative ions are hydroxides, OH-

    Dry resin loads up to bicarbonate OH- + CO2 HCO3

    - (hydroxide bicarbonate)

    Wet resin releases CO2 to carbonate 2HCO3

    - CO3-- + CO2 + H2O

    Moisture driven CO2 swing

  • 8/6/2019 Miriam Okun Presentation

    9/19

    6/17/20

    Novel Regenerator Chemistry

    Low absolute humidity

    in ambient air

    High absolute humidity

    without air

    Resin collects CO2Carbonate Bicarbonate

    Resin releases CO2Bicarbonate Carbonate

    REGENERATOR BOX COMPRESSION TRAIN

    Water vapor condenses

    out with compression (