missouri department of social services children's division ... · northwest northeast...

Children’s Division

Annual Report Fiscal Year 2015

Missouri Department of Social Services Research and Data Analysis

221 West High Street Broadway Building

Jefferson City, MO 65102

Children’s Division

Annual Report Fiscal Year 2015

Missouri Department of Social Services P.O. Box 1527

221 West High Street Broadway Building

Jefferson City, MO 65102-1527

Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement

To maintain or improve the quality of life for Missouri citizens.

JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, GOVERNOR • BRIAN KINKADE, DIRECTOR

JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, Governor • Ronald J. Levy,

Director

RELAY MISSOURI FOR HEARING AND SPEECH IMPAIRED

1-800-735-2466 VOICE • 1-800-735-2966 TEXT PHONE

An Equal Opportunity Employer, services provided on a nondiscriminatory basis.

TIM DECKER, DIRECTOR CHILDREN'S DIVISION

P.O. BOX 88 • JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65103-0088 WWW.DSS.MO.GOV • 573-522-8024 • 573-526-3971 FAX

Dear Reader:

The Children's Division is pleased to present the twentieth Children's Division Annual Report. Material in this report covers the activities during Fiscal Year 2015 (July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015). Information about children's services provided in the areas of Child Abuse/Neglect, Family-Centered Services, Out-Of-Home Placement, and Intensive In-Home Services are included in this report. We hope the data presented will be useful to all who are interested in the programs and services provided by the Children's Division and our partners for children and families of Missouri. Any questions about the report should be directed to the Children's Division or the Research and Data Analysis Unit, both located within the Department of Social Services.

Sincerely,

Tim Decker Director

Table of Contents

Child Abuse and Neglect ................................................................................ 1 Table 1. Reported Incidents and Children, FY 2015 Compared to FY 2014 ......................... 2 Table 2. Disposition of Children Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 by Conclusion ................................................................................. 4 Table 3. Status of Incidents Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 by Conclusion ................................................................................. 6 Table 4. Time Between Receipt of a Report and Initial Child Contact for Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 ........................................................... 8 Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 ...................................................................................................... 10 Table 6. CA/N Incidents and Referrals during FY 2015 ....................................................... 12 Figure 1. Conclusions of Completed CA/N Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 .... 14 Figure 2. Time Between Report and Initial Child Contact during FY 2015 .......................... 14 Figure 3. Number of Days to Complete Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 ........ 15 Figure 4. Investigations with Substantiated Conclusions during FY 2015 ........................... 15 Table 7. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children FY 2011 – 2015 ....................................... 16 Figure 5. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children FY 2011 – 2015 ....................................... 16 Table 8. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Family Assessment Findings FY 2011 – 2015 ..................................................................................................... 17 Figure 6. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Family Assessment Findings FY 2011 – 2015 ...................................................................................................... 17 Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ........................................................ 18

Family-Centered Services ............................................................................ 19 Table 9. Cases Active during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening ........................................... 20 Table 10. Persons in FCS during FY 2015 by Role ................................................................. 22 Table 11. Cases Opened during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24 Table 12. Cases Closed during FY 2015 by Reason for Closing ............................................. 26 Table 13. Cases Active during FY 2015 with Court Involvement by Number of Months Open ...................................................................................................................... 28 Table 14. Cases Active during FY 2015 with No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open ...................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 7. Family-Centered Services Cases Opened during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening ................................................................................................................. 32 Figure 8. Family-Centered Services Cases Closed during FY 2015 by Reason for Closing ................................................................................................................... 32 Table 15. Family-Centered Services Cases Active, Opened and Closed FY 2011 – 2015 ..... 33 Figure 9. Family-Centered Services Cases Active, Opened and Closed FY 2011 – 2015 ..... 33 Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures ....................................................... 34

Out-of-Home Placement ............................................................................. 35 Table 16. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Last Known Placement Category ................................................................... 36 Table 17. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County ...... 38 Table 18. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Last Known Placement Category ................................................................... 40 Table 19. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Last Known Placement Type .......................................................................... 42 Table 20. Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Length of Stay ................................................................................................ 48 Table 21. Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit ............................................................... 50 Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing ........................................ 52 Table 23. Children in Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Adoptive Status .............................................................................................. 54 Table 24. Children in Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Legal Status .................................................................................................... 56 Table 25. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Goal ................................................................................................................ 58 Table 26. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Length of Stay ................................................................................................ 60 Table 27. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Number of Placements during the Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell .......... 62 Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Case Manager County FY 2011 – 2015 ............................ 64 Table 29. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Age ................................................................................................................. 66 Table 30. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Race ................................................................................................................ 68 Table 31. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Hispanic Origin ............................................................................................... 70 Table 32. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Gender ........................................................................................................... 72 Table 33. CD Custody (Re)Entries by Month FY 2014 – 2015 ............................................... 74 Figure 10. CD Custody (Re)Entries by Month FY 2014 – 2015 ............................................... 74 Table 34. CD Custody Exits by Month FY 2014 – 2015 ......................................................... 74 Figure 11. CD Custody Exits by Month FY 2014 – 2015 ......................................................... 74 Figure 12. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Placement Type ............... 75 Figure 13. Children Closing from Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Close Reason ............ 75 Table 35. Children in CD Custody FY 2011 – 2015 ................................................................ 76 Figure 14. Children in CD Custody FY 2011 – 2015 ................................................................ 76 Table 36. Adoptions Finalized FY 2011 – FY 2015 ................................................................ 77 Figure 15. Adoptions Finalized FY 2011 – FY 2015 ................................................................ 77 Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ........................................................ 78

Intensive In-Home Services .......................................................................... 81 Table 37. Families Referred to IIS during FY 2015 by Referral County ................................. 82 Table 38. Families and Children Accepted into IIS during FY 2015 by Household County ... 84 Table 39. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS during FY 2015 .................................................. 86 Table 40. Families Referred to IIS FY 2011 – 2015 ............................................................... 88 Figure 16. Families Referred to IIS during FY 2015 ................................................................ 88 Table 41. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS FY 2011 – 2015 ................................................. 89 Figure 17. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS during FY 2015 .................................................. 89 Table 42. Families and Children Accepted into IIS FY 2011 – 2015 ...................................... 90 Figure 18. Families and Children Accepted into IIS FY 2011 – 2015 ...................................... 90 Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables and Figures .................................................... 91

Child Abuse and Neglect

Missouri Children's Division FY 2015 Report Page 1

Child Abuse and NeglectTable 1. Reported Incidents and Children, FY 2015 Compared to FY 2014

PERCENT PERCENTCOUNTY CHANGE CHANGE

NORTHWEST ANDREW 150 167 -10.2% 215 246 -12.6% ATCHISON 28 53 -47.2% 35 71 -50.7% BUCHANAN 1,519 1,588 -4.3% 2,375 2,566 -7.4% CALDWELL 99 101 -2.0% 151 157 -3.8% CARROLL 120 107 12.1% 197 183 7.7% CASS 921 997 -7.6% 1,225 1,467 -16.5% CHARITON 93 60 55.0% 163 92 77.2% CLAY 1,994 1,964 1.5% 2,814 2,795 0.7% CLINTON 240 241 -0.4% 344 346 -0.6% COOPER 187 225 -16.9% 287 329 -12.8% DAVIESS 98 85 15.3% 140 122 14.8% DE KALB 105 101 4.0% 154 143 7.7% GENTRY 62 74 -16.2% 90 120 -25.0%

GRUNDY 143 165 -13.3% 219 257 -14.8%HARRISON 114 91 25.3% 178 154 15.6%

HOLT 46 55 -16.4% 76 77 -1.3% JOHNSON 455 440 3.4% 677 665 1.8% LAFAYETTE 348 332 4.8% 490 486 0.8% LINN 156 150 4.0% 214 234 -8.5% LIVINGSTON 145 166 -12.7% 210 279 -24.7% MERCER 32 32 0.0% 55 52 5.8% NODAWAY 185 171 8.2% 275 245 12.2% PETTIS 586 632 -7.3% 850 961 -11.6% PLATTE 642 595 7.9% 870 825 5.5% PUTNAM 56 66 -15.2% 80 97 -17.5% RAY 329 273 20.5% 491 424 15.8% SALINE 264 361 -26.9% 441 524 -15.8% SULLIVAN 79 85 -7.1% 137 140 -2.1% WORTH 14 21 -33.3% 21 32 -34.4% *REGION TOTAL* 9,210 9,398 -2.0% 13,474 14,089 -4.4%

NORTHEAST ADAIR 312 267 16.9% 466 392 18.9% AUDRAIN 363 380 -4.5% 559 580 -3.6% BOONE 1,572 1,522 3.3% 2,194 2,168 1.2% CALLAWAY 697 709 -1.7% 1,025 1,055 -2.8% CLARK 71 72 -1.4% 106 116 -8.6% COLE 775 899 -13.8% 1,123 1,243 -9.7% FRANKLIN 1,148 1,138 0.9% 1,751 1,804 -2.9% GASCONADE 183 168 8.9% 277 279 -0.7% HOWARD 88 88 0.0% 124 123 0.8% JEFFERSON 1,941 1,985 -2.2% 2,759 2,922 -5.6% KNOX 33 32 3.1% 50 47 6.4% LEWIS 121 99 22.2% 172 148 16.2% LINCOLN 698 716 -2.5% 1,049 1,086 -3.4% MACON 169 141 19.9% 249 222 12.2% MARION 377 381 -1.0% 598 637 -6.1% MONROE 69 88 -21.6% 90 125 -28.0% MONTGOMERY 156 157 -0.6% 236 242 -2.5% OSAGE 98 80 22.5% 152 121 25.6% PIKE 194 211 -8.1% 295 318 -7.2% RALLS 78 75 4.0% 114 102 11.8% RANDOLPH 377 355 6.2% 565 538 5.0% SCHUYLER 46 42 9.5% 69 75 -8.0% SCOTLAND 27 28 -3.6% 36 45 -20.0% SHELBY 72 51 41.2% 116 101 14.9% ST. CHARLES 2,291 2,322 -1.3% 3,168 3,232 -2.0% WARREN 455 416 9.4% 683 641 6.6% *REGION TOTAL* 12,411 12,422 -0.1% 18,026 18,362 -1.8%

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 144 163 -11.7% 245 283 -13.4% BUTLER 684 689 -0.7% 1,036 1,045 -0.9% CAPE GIRARDEAU 638 645 -1.1% 973 989 -1.6% CARTER 92 74 24.3% 139 110 26.4% CRAWFORD 379 412 -8.0% 608 638 -4.7% DENT 232 211 10.0% 357 338 5.6% DUNKLIN 519 556 -6.7% 811 897 -9.6%

FY 2014CHILDREN

FY 2015INCIDENTS

FY 2014INCIDENTS

FY 2015CHILDREN

Page 2 Missouri Children's Division FY 2015 Report

Child Abuse and NeglectTable 1. (continued) Reported Incidents and Children, FY 2015 Compared to FY 2014

PERCENT PERCENTCOUNTY CHANGE CHANGE

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 674 658 2.4% 1,031 1,083 -4.8% IRON 124 152 -18.4% 191 224 -14.7% MADISON 161 222 -27.5% 266 391 -32.0%

MARIES 88 75 17.3% 138 124 11.3% MISSISSIPPI 184 213 -13.6% 288 341 -15.5% NEW MADRID 284 271 4.8% 414 404 2.5% OREGON 144 137 5.1% 226 241 -6.2% PEMISCOT 352 360 -2.2% 599 648 -7.6% PERRY 165 175 -5.7% 235 237 -0.8% PHELPS 540 612 -11.8% 801 894 -10.4% PULASKI 579 634 -8.7% 834 929 -10.2% REYNOLDS 88 110 -20.0% 119 169 -29.6% RIPLEY 210 219 -4.1% 330 349 -5.4% SCOTT 592 997 -40.6% 930 856 8.6% SHANNON 114 153 -25.5% 184 150 22.7% ST. FRANCOIS 934 530 76.2% 1,400 1,518 -7.8% STE. GENEVIEVE 164 103 59.2% 253 219 15.5% STODDARD 319 325 -1.8% 503 501 0.4% TEXAS 373 361 3.3% 571 546 4.6% WASHINGTON 373 335 11.3% 581 543 7.0% WAYNE 196 167 17.4% 312 266 17.3% *REGION TOTAL* 9,346 9,559 -2.2% 14,375 14,933 -3.7%

SOUTHWEST BARRY 441 427 3.3% 671 716 -6.3% BARTON 167 181 -7.7% 253 282 -10.3% BATES 199 213 -6.6% 302 311 -2.9% BENTON 203 215 -5.6% 298 308 -3.2% CAMDEN 522 510 2.4% 798 811 -1.6% CEDAR 227 196 15.8% 339 289 17.3% CHRISTIAN 899 933 -3.6% 1,251 1,292 -3.2% DADE 92 108 -14.8% 143 187 -23.5% DALLAS 337 257 31.1% 509 387 31.5% DOUGLAS 158 177 -10.7% 208 273 -23.8% GREENE 4,828 4,605 4.8% 6,815 6,773 0.6% HENRY 329 343 -4.1% 458 527 -13.1% HICKORY 79 114 -30.7% 117 159 -26.4% JASPER 1,707 1,722 -0.9% 2,482 2,577 -3.7% LACLEDE 698 720 -3.1% 1,077 1,088 -1.0% LAWRENCE 575 508 13.2% 869 753 15.4% MCDONALD 322 320 0.6% 490 500 -2.0% MILLER 371 456 -18.6% 550 692 -20.5% MONITEAU 190 198 -4.0% 284 330 -13.9% MORGAN 270 315 -14.3% 435 491 -11.4% NEWTON 676 641 5.5% 999 988 1.1% OZARK 97 117 -17.1% 139 172 -19.2% POLK 585 648 -9.7% 908 977 -7.1% ST. CLAIR 140 130 7.7% 218 206 5.8% STONE 348 363 -4.1% 492 551 -10.7% TANEY 817 766 6.7% 1,161 1,102 5.4% VERNON 304 284 7.0% 484 434 11.5% WEBSTER 516 450 14.7% 767 693 10.7% WRIGHT 360 397 -9.3% 572 680 -15.9% *REGION TOTAL* 16,457 16,314 0.9% 24,089 24,549 -1.9%

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 7,752 7,563 2.5% 11,432 11,279 1.4% *REGION TOTAL* 7,752 7,563 2.5% 11,432 11,279 1.4%

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 4,198 3,917 7.2% 6,250 5,990 4.3% ST. LOUIS COUNTY 6,602 6,548 0.8% 9,098 9,216 -1.3% *REGION TOTAL* 10,800 10,465 3.2% 15,348 15,206 0.9%

OTHER OUT HOME INV 2,563 2,423 5.8% 3,776 3,572 5.7%OUT OF STATE 84 90 -6.7% 105 110 -4.5%*REGION TOTAL* 2,647 2,513 5.3% 3,881 3,682 5.4%

STATE TOTAL 68,623 68,234 0.6% 100,625 102,100 -1.4%

INCIDENTS INCIDENTS CHILDREN CHILDRENFY 2015 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2014


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 2. Disposition of Children Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 by Conclusion

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 4 7 70 123 11 215 0.96 51.63 ATCHISON 2 3 15 15 0 35 1.69 29.61 BUCHANAN 106 129 818 1,293 29 2,375 5.06 113.29 CALDWELL 8 17 20 105 1 151 3.33 62.81 CARROLL 18 3 55 120 1 197 8.21 89.87 CASS 68 52 393 690 22 1,225 2.58 46.43 CHARITON 4 24 38 94 3 163 2.26 92.14 CLAY 110 123 886 1,648 47 2,814 1.92 49.14 CLINTON 26 26 105 183 4 344 5.10 67.53 COOPER 11 3 95 176 2 287 2.76 72.13 DAVIESS 5 20 38 77 0 140 2.22 62.17

DE KALB 15 10 57 69 3 154 6.49 66.67 GENTRY 9 4 40 37 0 90 5.44 54.41 GRUNDY 11 29 65 114 0 219 4.46 88.77 HARRISON 13 14 54 93 4 178 5.85 80.14 HOLT 1 2 28 45 0 76 1.03 78.27 JOHNSON 35 14 218 396 14 677 2.91 56.22 LAFAYETTE 60 17 161 245 7 490 7.33 59.85 LINN 26 22 46 116 4 214 8.24 67.81 LIVINGSTON 4 26 50 128 2 210 1.20 63.08 MERCER 5 3 13 34 0 55 5.19 57.11 NODAWAY 17 11 97 147 3 275 3.99 64.51 PETTIS 52 23 279 491 5 850 4.82 78.82 PLATTE 36 45 297 480 12 870 1.64 39.55 PUTNAM 6 7 20 45 2 80 5.17 68.97 RAY 19 10 173 281 8 491 3.24 83.69 SALINE 25 17 124 274 1 441 4.63 81.73 SULLIVAN 8 13 40 75 1 137 4.92 84.31 WORTH 0 1 7 13 0 21 0.00 47.30

*REGION TOTAL* 704 675 4,302 7,607 186 13,474 3.25 62.24

NORTHEAST ADAIR 32 59 93 273 9 466 6.44 93.72 AUDRAIN 34 42 160 317 6 559 5.34 87.77 BOONE 164 116 576 1,187 151 2,194 4.79 64.06 CALLAWAY 78 64 274 587 22 1,025 7.80 102.47 CLARK 23 27 8 47 1 106 13.40 61.74 COLE 23 133 343 606 18 1,123 1.28 62.61 FRANKLIN 108 73 493 1,065 12 1,751 4.30 69.75 GASCONADE 14 17 60 184 2 277 4.16 82.34 HOWARD 16 7 34 66 1 124 7.35 56.93 JEFFERSON 238 265 480 1,739 37 2,759 4.33 50.17 KNOX 3 4 11 27 5 50 2.91 48.45 LEWIS 18 17 39 92 6 172 7.52 71.82 LINCOLN 44 63 310 623 9 1,049 2.99 71.23 MACON 20 11 57 160 1 249 5.29 65.89 MARION 82 25 145 328 18 598 11.90 86.82 MONROE 10 2 26 49 3 90 4.85 43.67 MONTGOMERY 12 30 49 138 7 236 4.21 82.72 OSAGE 16 5 36 95 0 152 4.66 44.28 PIKE 39 21 61 169 5 295 9.50 71.83 RALLS 17 3 17 76 1 114 7.15 47.94 RANDOLPH 60 24 131 336 14 565 10.21 96.10 SCHUYLER 8 19 10 32 0 69 7.02 60.53 SCOTLAND 4 7 4 19 2 36 2.94 26.43 SHELBY 17 14 17 63 5 116 10.64 72.64 ST. CHARLES 259 119 903 1,829 58 3,168 2.79 34.12 WARREN 51 57 191 371 13 683 6.28 84.05

*REGION TOTAL* 1,390 1,224 4,528 10,478 406 18,026 4.41 57.13

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 35 5 62 143 0 245 12.00 83.99 BUTLER 107 83 343 476 27 1,036 10.73 103.90 CAPE GIRARDEAU 62 42 240 594 35 973 3.74 58.62 CARTER 7 13 40 61 18 139 4.62 91.75 CRAWFORD 49 109 133 298 19 608 8.17 101.32 DENT 31 50 87 183 6 357 8.49 97.75

DUNKLIN 54 56 275 409 17 811 6.68 100.32

FAMILYASSESS. OTHER

TOTALCHILDREN

SUBSTAN-TIATED

UNSUB.PSI UNSUB.

SUBSTAN-TIATED

CHILDRENPER 1,000

TOTALCHILDRENPER 1,000


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 2. (continued) Disposition of Children Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 by Conclusion

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 104 119 275 509 24 1,031 10.33 102.44 IRON 8 15 48 115 5 191 3.33 79.48

MADISON 14 12 68 161 11 266 4.78 90.75 MARIES 16 8 37 77 0 138 7.43 64.07 MISSISSIPPI 14 18 96 159 1 288 4.39 90.34 NEW MADRID 52 70 102 184 6 414 11.52 91.71 OREGON 10 16 97 97 6 226 4.12 93.16 PEMISCOT 48 95 162 284 10 599 9.54 118.99 PERRY 25 6 58 137 9 235 5.25 49.35 PHELPS 45 86 254 388 28 801 4.60 81.80 PULASKI 66 76 262 403 27 834 5.26 66.52 REYNOLDS 6 13 39 60 1 119 3.92 77.68 RIPLEY 36 37 77 170 10 330 10.89 99.79 SCOTT 64 46 293 520 7 930 6.50 94.42 SHANNON 29 9 48 98 0 184 14.71 93.35 ST. FRANCOIS 82 61 485 743 29 1,400 5.69 97.17 STE. GENEVIEVE 20 10 75 148 0 253 4.74 59.94 STODDARD 52 45 128 271 7 503 7.61 73.63 TEXAS 53 72 143 286 17 571 9.26 99.81 WASHINGTON 25 28 221 294 13 581 4.12 95.83 WAYNE 12 29 72 197 2 312 4.28 111.19

*REGION TOTAL* 1,126 1,229 4,220 7,465 335 14,375 6.81 86.99

SOUTHWEST BARRY 76 66 186 323 20 671 8.80 77.66 BARTON 28 12 74 134 5 253 8.71 78.72 BATES 28 3 70 200 1 302 6.58 70.99 BENTON 29 13 64 185 7 298 8.44 86.70 CAMDEN 110 43 189 447 9 798 13.11 95.11 CEDAR 41 13 107 165 13 339 12.39 102.48 CHRISTIAN 53 122 321 732 23 1,251 2.50 59.05 DADE 9 10 22 98 4 143 5.04 80.11 DALLAS 41 40 123 296 9 509 9.83 122.09 DOUGLAS 23 7 68 104 6 208 7.51 67.95 GREENE 384 394 2,001 3,820 216 6,815 6.58 116.75 HENRY 25 22 88 322 1 458 5.04 92.41 HICKORY 5 21 25 63 3 117 3.00 70.27 JASPER 95 105 794 1,438 50 2,482 3.14 81.97 LACLEDE 120 124 215 605 13 1,077 13.47 120.92 LAWRENCE 63 78 240 454 34 869 6.19 85.41 MCDONALD 22 55 165 220 28 490 3.40 75.68 MILLER 47 37 170 293 3 550 7.65 89.52 MONITEAU 35 11 72 162 4 284 8.91 72.34 MORGAN 67 49 87 230 2 435 14.78 95.94 NEWTON 28 108 282 549 32 999 1.90 67.67 OZARK 17 4 31 81 6 139 8.72 71.32 POLK 42 77 195 568 26 908 5.48 118.45 ST. CLAIR 11 12 43 150 2 218 5.61 111.22 STONE 34 39 129 241 49 492 5.64 81.56 TANEY 58 121 235 717 30 1,161 5.08 101.60 VERNON 34 13 133 281 23 484 6.46 91.96 WEBSTER 62 63 227 388 27 767 6.18 76.40 WRIGHT 62 17 151 329 13 572 12.73 117.41

*REGION TOTAL* 1,649 1,679 6,507 13,595 659 24,089 6.32 92.35

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 463 279 2,166 7,862 662 11,432 2.80 69.02*REGION TOTAL* 463 279 2,166 7,862 662 11,432 2.80 69.02

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 293 325 1,719 3,098 815 6,250 4.34 92.54ST. LOUIS COUNTY 526 485 2,841 4,914 332 9,098 2.25 38.85*REGION TOTAL* 819 810 4,560 8,012 1,147 15,348 2.71 50.87

OTHER OUT HOME INV 93 3 3,496 0 184 3,776 0.00 0.00OUT OF STATE 0 0 0 0 105 105 0.00 0.00*REGION TOTAL* 93 3 3,496 0 289 3,881 0.00 0.00

STATE TOTAL 6,244 5,899 29,779 55,019 3,684 100,625 4.38 70.59

TIATED PSI UNSUB. ASSESS. OTHER CHILDREN PER 1,000 PER 1,000CHILDREN

SUBSTAN-TIATED TOTAL

SUBSTAN- UNSUB. FAMILY TOTAL CHILDREN


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 3. Status of Incidents Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 by Conclusion

COUNTY TOTALNORTHWEST ANDREW 4 2.7% 4 2.7% 53 35.3% 84 56.0% 5 3.3% 150 ATCHISON 2 7.1% 2 7.1% 9 32.1% 15 53.6% 0 0.0% 28 BUCHANAN 79 5.2% 71 4.7% 517 34.0% 830 54.6% 22 1.4% 1,519 CALDWELL 8 8.1% 13 13.1% 13 13.1% 64 64.6% 1 1.0% 99 CARROLL 12 10.0% 3 2.5% 35 29.2% 69 57.5% 1 0.8% 120 CASS 52 5.6% 30 3.3% 300 32.6% 521 56.6% 18 2.0% 921 CHARITON 4 4.3% 13 14.0% 24 25.8% 50 53.8% 2 2.2% 93 CLAY 88 4.4% 86 4.3% 633 31.7% 1,149 57.6% 38 1.9% 1,994 CLINTON 20 8.3% 14 5.8% 75 31.3% 127 52.9% 4 1.7% 240 COOPER 9 4.8% 2 1.1% 59 31.6% 113 60.4% 4 2.1% 187 DAVIESS 5 5.1% 12 12.2% 22 22.4% 59 60.2% 0 0.0% 98 DE KALB 10 9.5% 9 8.6% 35 33.3% 48 45.7% 3 2.9% 105 GENTRY 5 8.1% 3 4.8% 24 38.7% 30 48.4% 0 0.0% 62

GRUNDY 9 6.3% 16 11.2% 44 30.8% 74 51.7% 0 0.0% 143HARRISON 7 6.1% 11 9.6% 33 28.9% 61 53.5% 2 1.8% 114

HOLT 1 2.2% 2 4.3% 18 39.1% 25 54.3% 0 0.0% 46 JOHNSON 21 4.6% 9 2.0% 148 32.5% 268 58.9% 9 2.0% 455 LAFAYETTE 41 11.8% 13 3.7% 114 32.8% 174 50.0% 6 1.7% 348 LINN 15 9.6% 15 9.6% 34 21.8% 89 57.1% 3 1.9% 156 LIVINGSTON 3 2.1% 17 11.7% 35 24.1% 88 60.7% 2 1.4% 145 MERCER 2 6.3% 2 6.3% 10 31.3% 18 56.3% 0 0.0% 32 NODAWAY 12 6.5% 6 3.2% 65 35.1% 100 54.1% 2 1.1% 185 PETTIS 39 6.7% 14 2.4% 188 32.1% 341 58.2% 4 0.7% 586 PLATTE 32 5.0% 25 3.9% 225 35.0% 351 54.7% 9 1.4% 642 PUTNAM 6 10.7% 6 10.7% 14 25.0% 28 50.0% 2 3.6% 56 RAY 12 3.6% 7 2.1% 105 31.9% 198 60.2% 7 2.1% 329 SALINE 14 5.3% 11 4.2% 86 32.6% 151 57.2% 2 0.8% 264 SULLIVAN 5 6.3% 6 7.6% 25 31.6% 42 53.2% 1 1.3% 79 WORTH 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 4 28.6% 9 64.3% 0 0.0% 14 *REGION TOTAL* 517 5.6% 423 4.6% 2,947 32.0% 5,176 56.2% 147 1.6% 9,210

NORTHEAST ADAIR 14 4.5% 44 14.1% 60 19.2% 183 58.7% 11 3.5% 312 AUDRAIN 24 6.6% 21 5.8% 109 30.0% 205 56.5% 4 1.1% 363 BOONE 115 7.3% 76 4.8% 399 25.4% 862 54.8% 120 7.6% 1,572 CALLAWAY 62 8.9% 43 6.2% 197 28.3% 375 53.8% 20 2.9% 697 CLARK 11 15.5% 16 22.5% 7 9.9% 36 50.7% 1 1.4% 71 COLE 16 2.1% 86 11.1% 223 28.8% 436 56.3% 14 1.8% 775 FRANKLIN 74 6.4% 55 4.8% 332 28.9% 679 59.1% 8 0.7% 1,148 GASCONADE 11 6.0% 11 6.0% 51 27.9% 108 59.0% 2 1.1% 183 HOWARD 14 15.9% 4 4.5% 26 29.5% 43 48.9% 1 1.1% 88 JEFFERSON 153 7.9% 187 9.6% 330 17.0% 1,237 63.7% 34 1.8% 1,941 KNOX 3 9.1% 3 9.1% 9 27.3% 15 45.5% 3 9.1% 33 LEWIS 10 8.3% 10 8.3% 27 22.3% 69 57.0% 5 4.1% 121 LINCOLN 39 5.6% 42 6.0% 212 30.4% 398 57.0% 7 1.0% 698 MACON 15 8.9% 8 4.7% 44 26.0% 100 59.2% 2 1.2% 169 MARION 50 13.3% 20 5.3% 87 23.1% 209 55.4% 11 2.9% 377 MONROE 7 10.1% 2 2.9% 19 27.5% 38 55.1% 3 4.3% 69 MONTGOMERY 7 4.5% 19 12.2% 34 21.8% 91 58.3% 5 3.2% 156 OSAGE 7 7.1% 5 5.1% 25 25.5% 61 62.2% 0 0.0% 98 PIKE 25 12.9% 13 6.7% 39 20.1% 113 58.2% 4 2.1% 194 RALLS 7 9.0% 2 2.6% 15 19.2% 53 67.9% 1 1.3% 78 RANDOLPH 42 11.1% 15 4.0% 88 23.3% 221 58.6% 11 2.9% 377 SCHUYLER 6 13.0% 11 23.9% 9 19.6% 20 43.5% 0 0.0% 46 SCOTLAND 3 11.1% 4 14.8% 4 14.8% 15 55.6% 1 3.7% 27 SHELBY 10 13.9% 5 6.9% 13 18.1% 41 56.9% 3 4.2% 72 ST. CHARLES 185 8.1% 73 3.2% 673 29.4% 1,318 57.5% 42 1.8% 2,291 WARREN 37 8.1% 32 7.0% 129 28.4% 248 54.5% 9 2.0% 455 *REGION TOTAL* 947 7.6% 807 6.5% 3,161 25.5% 7,174 57.8% 322 2.6% 12,411

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 18 12.5% 1 0.7% 37 25.7% 88 61.1% 0 0.0% 144 BUTLER 69 10.1% 55 8.0% 229 33.5% 311 45.5% 20 2.9% 684 CAPE GIRARDEAU 44 6.9% 25 3.9% 161 25.2% 386 60.5% 22 3.4% 638 CARTER 5 5.4% 9 9.8% 24 26.1% 46 50.0% 8 8.7% 92 CRAWFORD 33 8.7% 61 16.1% 82 21.6% 189 49.9% 14 3.7% 379 DENT 19 8.2% 29 12.5% 57 24.6% 122 52.6% 5 2.2% 232

DUNKLIN 35 6.7% 32 6.2% 185 35.6% 255 49.1% 12 2.3% 519

UNSUB. PSISUBSTANTIATED UNSUB. FAMILY ASSESS. OTHER


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 3. (continued) Status of Incidents Based Upon Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015 by Conclusion

COUNTY TOTALSOUTHEAST HOWELL 64 9.5% 67 9.9% 183 27.2% 340 50.4% 20 3.0% 674 IRON 5 4.0% 11 8.9% 34 27.4% 67 54.0% 7 5.6% 124

MADISON 10 6.2% 7 4.3% 47 29.2% 89 55.3% 8 5.0% 161 MARIES 9 10.2% 6 6.8% 25 28.4% 48 54.5% 0 0.0% 88 MISSISSIPPI 10 5.4% 8 4.3% 67 36.4% 98 53.3% 1 0.5% 184 NEW MADRID 36 12.7% 44 15.5% 75 26.4% 125 44.0% 4 1.4% 284 OREGON 7 4.9% 12 8.3% 57 39.6% 64 44.4% 4 2.8% 144 PEMISCOT 35 9.9% 48 13.6% 88 25.0% 174 49.4% 7 2.0% 352 PERRY 18 10.9% 5 3.0% 40 24.2% 95 57.6% 7 4.2% 165

PHELPS 32 5.9% 51 9.4% 173 32.0% 263 48.7% 21 3.9% 540PULASKI 38 6.6% 52 9.0% 186 32.1% 283 48.9% 20 3.5% 579REYNOLDS 6 6.8% 11 12.5% 29 33.0% 42 47.7% 0 0.0% 88RIPLEY 27 12.9% 21 10.0% 58 27.6% 97 46.2% 7 3.3% 210

SCOTT 47 7.9% 29 4.9% 194 32.8% 316 53.4% 6 1.0% 592 SHANNON 16 14.0% 5 4.4% 29 25.4% 63 55.3% 1 0.9% 114 ST. FRANCOIS 61 6.5% 36 3.9% 322 34.5% 491 52.6% 24 2.6% 934 STE. GENEVIEVE 13 7.9% 7 4.3% 47 28.7% 97 59.1% 0 0.0% 164 STODDARD 33 10.3% 30 9.4% 86 27.0% 164 51.4% 6 1.9% 319 TEXAS 33 8.8% 42 11.3% 103 27.6% 184 49.3% 11 2.9% 373 WASHINGTON 22 5.9% 18 4.8% 129 34.6% 195 52.3% 9 2.4% 373 WAYNE 8 4.1% 17 8.7% 47 24.0% 119 60.7% 5 2.6% 196 *REGION TOTAL* 753 8.1% 739 7.9% 2,794 29.9% 4,811 51.5% 249 2.7% 9,346

SOUTHWEST BARRY 45 10.2% 38 8.6% 130 29.5% 211 47.8% 17 3.9% 441 BARTON 20 12.0% 5 3.0% 46 27.5% 93 55.7% 3 1.8% 167 BATES 15 7.5% 3 1.5% 45 22.6% 135 67.8% 1 0.5% 199 BENTON 16 7.9% 9 4.4% 47 23.2% 124 61.1% 7 3.4% 203 CAMDEN 73 14.0% 26 5.0% 123 23.6% 295 56.5% 5 1.0% 522 CEDAR 21 9.3% 7 3.1% 76 33.5% 111 48.9% 12 5.3% 227 CHRISTIAN 43 4.8% 84 9.3% 239 26.6% 518 57.6% 15 1.7% 899 DADE 6 6.5% 4 4.3% 18 19.6% 61 66.3% 3 3.3% 92 DALLAS 25 7.4% 29 8.6% 85 25.2% 193 57.3% 5 1.5% 337 DOUGLAS 17 10.8% 5 3.2% 57 36.1% 72 45.6% 7 4.4% 158 GREENE 268 5.6% 277 5.7% 1,415 29.3% 2,692 55.8% 176 3.6% 4,828 HENRY 22 6.7% 17 5.2% 69 21.0% 219 66.6% 2 0.6% 329 HICKORY 3 3.8% 13 16.5% 19 24.1% 41 51.9% 3 3.8% 79 JASPER 75 4.4% 78 4.6% 570 33.4% 946 55.4% 38 2.2% 1,707 LACLEDE 83 11.9% 77 11.0% 140 20.1% 388 55.6% 10 1.4% 698 LAWRENCE 46 8.0% 48 8.3% 157 27.3% 294 51.1% 30 5.2% 575 MCDONALD 15 4.7% 31 9.6% 115 35.7% 142 44.1% 19 5.9% 322 MILLER 33 8.9% 24 6.5% 113 30.5% 199 53.6% 2 0.5% 371 MONITEAU 22 11.6% 7 3.7% 47 24.7% 112 58.9% 2 1.1% 190 MORGAN 36 13.3% 27 10.0% 59 21.9% 144 53.3% 4 1.5% 270 NEWTON 24 3.6% 64 9.5% 205 30.3% 360 53.3% 23 3.4% 676 OZARK 11 11.3% 4 4.1% 24 24.7% 52 53.6% 6 6.2% 97 POLK 29 5.0% 49 8.4% 140 23.9% 345 59.0% 22 3.8% 585 ST. CLAIR 9 6.4% 9 6.4% 25 17.9% 95 67.9% 2 1.4% 140 STONE 24 6.9% 26 7.5% 92 26.4% 172 49.4% 34 9.8% 348 TANEY 42 5.1% 78 9.5% 175 21.4% 498 61.0% 24 2.9% 817 VERNON 21 6.9% 9 3.0% 93 30.6% 167 54.9% 14 4.6% 304 WEBSTER 50 9.7% 36 7.0% 141 27.3% 263 51.0% 26 5.0% 516 WRIGHT 33 9.2% 12 3.3% 102 28.3% 203 56.4% 10 2.8% 360 *REGION TOTAL* 1,127 6.8% 1,096 6.7% 4,567 27.8% 9,145 55.6% 522 3.2% 16,457

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 342 4.4% 187 2.4% 1,552 20.0% 5,221 67.4% 450 5.8% 7,752 *REGION TOTAL* 342 4.4% 187 2.4% 1,552 20.0% 5,221 67.4% 450 5.8% 7,752

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 229 5.5% 219 5.2% 1,114 26.5% 2,090 49.8% 546 13.0% 4,198 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 377 5.7% 333 5.0% 2,077 31.5% 3,551 53.8% 264 4.0% 6,602 *REGION TOTAL* 606 5.6% 552 5.1% 3,191 29.5% 5,641 52.2% 810 7.5% 10,800

OTHER OUT HOME INV 68 2.7% 3 0.1% 2,357 92.0% 0 0.0% 135 5.3% 2,563OUT OF STATE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 84 100.0% 84

*REGION TOTAL* 68 2.6% 3 0.1% 2,357 89.0% 0 0.0% 219 8.3% 2,647

STATE TOTAL 4,360 6.4% 3,807 5.5% 20,569 30.0% 37,168 54.2% 2,719 4.0% 68,623

SUBSTANTIATED UNSUB. PSI UNSUB. FAMILY ASSESS. OTHER


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 4. Time Between Receipt of Report and Initial Child Contact for Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 129 86.0% 21 14.0% 150 ATCHISON 22 75.9% 7 24.1% 29 BUCHANAN 1,337 86.5% 209 13.5% 1,546 CALDWELL 94 91.3% 9 8.7% 103 CARROLL 105 89.0% 13 11.0% 118 CASS 876 92.2% 74 7.8% 950 CHARITON 87 95.6% 4 4.4% 91 CLAY 1,801 91.3% 172 8.7% 1,973 CLINTON 208 85.2% 36 14.8% 244 COOPER 169 90.9% 17 9.1% 186 DAVIESS 84 86.6% 13 13.4% 97 DE KALB 90 87.4% 13 12.6% 103 GENTRY 63 94.0% 4 6.0% 67

GRUNDY 140 92.7% 11 7.3% 151HARRISON 112 94.9% 6 5.1% 118

HOLT 37 84.1% 7 15.9% 44 JOHNSON 414 90.8% 42 9.2% 456 LAFAYETTE 302 85.1% 53 14.9% 355 LINN 153 94.4% 9 5.6% 162 LIVINGSTON 136 88.3% 18 11.7% 154 MERCER 30 93.8% 2 6.3% 32 NODAWAY 161 89.4% 19 10.6% 180 PETTIS 528 88.3% 70 11.7% 598 PLATTE 581 88.8% 73 11.2% 654 PUTNAM 55 96.5% 2 3.5% 57 RAY 297 89.5% 35 10.5% 332 SALINE 258 96.3% 10 3.7% 268 SULLIVAN 75 96.2% 3 3.8% 78 WORTH 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 16 *REGION TOTAL* 8,360 89.8% 952 10.2% 9,312

NORTHEAST ADAIR 297 94.9% 16 5.1% 313 AUDRAIN 299 83.5% 59 16.5% 358 BOONE 1,156 82.0% 253 18.0% 1,409 CALLAWAY 625 91.4% 59 8.6% 684 CLARK 68 97.1% 2 2.9% 70 COLE 739 90.5% 78 9.5% 817 FRANKLIN 1,003 80.8% 238 19.2% 1,241 GASCONADE 152 77.2% 45 22.8% 197 HOWARD 95 97.9% 2 2.1% 97 JEFFERSON 1,677 86.9% 253 13.1% 1,930 KNOX 29 93.5% 2 6.5% 31 LEWIS 112 94.1% 7 5.9% 119 LINCOLN 653 89.0% 81 11.0% 734 MACON 160 93.0% 12 7.0% 172 MARION 346 89.4% 41 10.6% 387 MONROE 56 86.2% 9 13.8% 65 MONTGOMERY 129 84.3% 24 15.7% 153 OSAGE 77 76.2% 24 23.8% 101 PIKE 179 88.6% 23 11.4% 202 RALLS 71 93.4% 5 6.6% 76 RANDOLPH 373 94.7% 21 5.3% 394 SCHUYLER 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 SCOTLAND 26 96.3% 1 3.7% 27 SHELBY 66 91.7% 6 8.3% 72 ST. CHARLES 2,008 90.5% 211 9.5% 2,219 WARREN 412 90.0% 46 10.0% 458 *REGION TOTAL* 10,852 87.7% 1,519 12.3% 12,371

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 136 91.9% 12 8.1% 148 BUTLER 621 88.2% 83 11.8% 704 CAPE GIRARDEAU 625 93.7% 42 6.3% 667 CARTER 75 88.2% 10 11.8% 85 CRAWFORD 319 83.1% 65 16.9% 384 DENT 211 86.8% 32 13.2% 243 DUNKLIN 487 91.4% 46 8.6% 533

TOTAL0 - 24 HOURS OVER 24 HOURS


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 4. (continued) Time Between Receipt of Report and Initial Child Contact for Completed Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 597 91.3% 57 8.7% 654 IRON 106 83.5% 21 16.5% 127

MADISON 139 86.9% 21 13.1% 160 MARIES 65 71.4% 26 28.6% 91 MISSISSIPPI 181 94.8% 10 5.2% 191 NEW MADRID 280 90.6% 29 9.4% 309 OREGON 122 84.1% 23 15.9% 145 PEMISCOT 342 90.0% 38 10.0% 380 PERRY 156 95.1% 8 4.9% 164 PHELPS 466 81.5% 106 18.5% 572 PULASKI 515 84.4% 95 15.6% 610 REYNOLDS 85 90.4% 9 9.6% 94 RIPLEY 187 89.0% 23 11.0% 210 SCOTT 593 96.0% 25 4.0% 618 SHANNON 101 89.4% 12 10.6% 113 ST. FRANCOIS 881 90.3% 95 9.7% 976 STE. GENEVIEVE 144 87.3% 21 12.7% 165

STODDARD 319 91.7% 29 8.3% 348 TEXAS 349 92.3% 29 7.7% 378 WASHINGTON 332 89.0% 41 11.0% 373 WAYNE 176 88.0% 24 12.0% 200 *REGION TOTAL* 8,610 89.3% 1,032 10.7% 9,642

SOUTHWEST BARRY 372 84.2% 70 15.8% 442 BARTON 164 94.3% 10 5.7% 174 BATES 185 87.7% 26 12.3% 211 BENTON 173 86.9% 26 13.1% 199 CAMDEN 441 84.5% 81 15.5% 522 CEDAR 200 85.8% 33 14.2% 233 CHRISTIAN 790 86.5% 123 13.5% 913 DADE 80 87.9% 11 12.1% 91 DALLAS 307 89.0% 38 11.0% 345 DOUGLAS 144 85.2% 25 14.8% 169 GREENE 4,173 83.6% 820 16.4% 4,993 HENRY 304 90.5% 32 9.5% 336 HICKORY 73 90.1% 8 9.9% 81 JASPER 1,608 90.7% 165 9.3% 1,773 LACLEDE 617 85.3% 106 14.7% 723 LAWRENCE 446 82.1% 97 17.9% 543 MCDONALD 306 91.6% 28 8.4% 334 MILLER 328 89.1% 40 10.9% 368 MONITEAU 179 92.3% 15 7.7% 194 MORGAN 249 91.2% 24 8.8% 273 NEWTON 629 88.6% 81 11.4% 710 OZARK 89 84.0% 17 16.0% 106 POLK 554 89.1% 68 10.9% 622 ST. CLAIR 127 85.8% 21 14.2% 148 STONE 241 78.0% 68 22.0% 309 TANEY 750 92.5% 61 7.5% 811 VERNON 271 89.7% 31 10.3% 302 WEBSTER 466 91.9% 41 8.1% 507 WRIGHT 332 86.7% 51 13.3% 383 *REGION TOTAL* 14,598 86.8% 2,217 13.2% 16,815

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 6,285 86.6% 972 13.4% 7,257 *REGION TOTAL* 6,285 86.6% 972 13.4% 7,257

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 2,320 64.7% 1,268 35.3% 3,588 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 5,223 79.9% 1,313 20.1% 6,536 *REGION TOTAL* 7,543 74.5% 2,581 25.5% 10,124

OTHER OUT HOME INV 2,468 98.4% 39 1.6% 2,507 *REGION TOTAL* 2,468 98.4% 39 1.6% 2,507

STATE TOTAL 58,716 86.3% 9,312 13.7% 68,028

0 - 24 HOURS OVER 24 HOURS TOTAL


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 147 98.0% 3 2.0% 150 ATCHISON 20 71.4% 8 28.6% 28 BUCHANAN 1,442 95.1% 74 4.9% 1,516 CALDWELL 70 70.7% 29 29.3% 99 CARROLL 112 93.3% 8 6.7% 120 CASS 689 75.0% 230 25.0% 919 CHARITON 93 100.0% 0 0.0% 93 CLAY 1,893 95.2% 95 4.8% 1,988 CLINTON 231 96.3% 9 3.8% 240 COOPER 157 85.3% 27 14.7% 184 DAVIESS 80 81.6% 18 18.4% 98 DE KALB 100 95.2% 5 4.8% 105 GENTRY 56 90.3% 6 9.7% 62

GRUNDY 138 96.5% 5 3.5% 143HARRISON 111 98.2% 2 1.8% 113

HOLT 35 76.1% 11 23.9% 46 JOHNSON 287 63.1% 168 36.9% 455 LAFAYETTE 278 79.9% 70 20.1% 348 LINN 154 99.4% 1 0.6% 155 LIVINGSTON 92 63.4% 53 36.6% 145 MERCER 31 96.9% 1 3.1% 32 NODAWAY 148 80.0% 37 20.0% 185 PETTIS 499 85.3% 86 14.7% 585 PLATTE 621 96.7% 21 3.3% 642 PUTNAM 52 94.5% 3 5.5% 55 RAY 296 90.2% 32 9.8% 328 SALINE 258 98.1% 5 1.9% 263 SULLIVAN 79 100.0% 0 0.0% 79 WORTH 13 92.9% 1 7.1% 14 *REGION TOTAL* 8,182 89.0% 1,008 11.0% 9,190

NORTHEAST ADAIR 263 86.2% 42 13.8% 305 AUDRAIN 327 90.1% 36 9.9% 363 BOONE 979 66.2% 500 33.8% 1,479 CALLAWAY 549 79.0% 146 21.0% 695 CLARK 68 95.8% 3 4.2% 71 COLE 739 95.7% 33 4.3% 772 FRANKLIN 835 72.7% 313 27.3% 1,148 GASCONADE 143 78.1% 40 21.9% 183 HOWARD 83 94.3% 5 5.7% 88 JEFFERSON 1,344 69.7% 585 30.3% 1,929 KNOX 23 71.9% 9 28.1% 32 LEWIS 91 76.5% 28 23.5% 119 LINCOLN 652 93.5% 45 6.5% 697 MACON 150 89.8% 17 10.2% 167 MARION 373 98.9% 4 1.1% 377 MONROE 35 51.5% 33 48.5% 68 MONTGOMERY 146 93.6% 10 6.4% 156 OSAGE 77 78.6% 21 21.4% 98 PIKE 184 96.3% 7 3.7% 191 RALLS 77 98.7% 1 1.3% 78 RANDOLPH 309 82.0% 68 18.0% 377 SCHUYLER 45 97.8% 1 2.2% 46 SCOTLAND 24 88.9% 3 11.1% 27 SHELBY 67 94.4% 4 5.6% 71 ST. CHARLES 1,788 78.2% 499 21.8% 2,287 WARREN 443 98.2% 8 1.8% 451 *REGION TOTAL* 9,814 80.0% 2,461 20.0% 12,275

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 89 61.8% 55 38.2% 144 BUTLER 324 47.6% 356 52.4% 680 CAPE GIRARDEAU 387 61.1% 246 38.9% 633 CARTER 92 100.0% 0 0.0% 92 CRAWFORD 289 76.3% 90 23.7% 379 DENT 191 82.7% 40 17.3% 231

DUNKLIN 497 96.7% 17 3.3% 514

TOTAL0 - 45 DAYS OVER 45 DAYS


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 5. (continued) Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments

during FY 2015

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 667 99.6% 3 0.4% 670 IRON 107 88.4% 14 11.6% 121

MADISON 81 51.6% 76 48.4% 157 MARIES 63 71.6% 25 28.4% 88 MISSISSIPPI 178 97.3% 5 2.7% 183 NEW MADRID 220 77.5% 64 22.5% 284 OREGON 142 99.3% 1 0.7% 143 PEMISCOT 273 77.6% 79 22.4% 352 PERRY 91 55.5% 73 44.5% 164 PHELPS 383 71.3% 154 28.7% 537 PULASKI 478 83.7% 93 16.3% 571 REYNOLDS 79 89.8% 9 10.2% 88 RIPLEY 98 47.1% 110 52.9% 208 SCOTT 571 96.9% 18 3.1% 589 SHANNON 113 100.0% 0 0.0% 113 ST. FRANCOIS 528 56.8% 401 43.2% 929

STE. GENEVIEVE 96 58.5% 68 41.5% 164 STODDARD 313 98.1% 6 1.9% 319 TEXAS 264 71.7% 104 28.3% 368 WASHINGTON 198 53.2% 174 46.8% 372 WAYNE 180 93.8% 12 6.3% 192 *REGION TOTAL* 6,992 75.3% 2,293 24.7% 9,285

SOUTHWEST BARRY 251 58.8% 176 41.2% 427 BARTON 154 92.8% 12 7.2% 166 BATES 173 86.9% 26 13.1% 199 BENTON 200 99.0% 2 1.0% 202 CAMDEN 385 73.8% 137 26.2% 522 CEDAR 177 78.3% 49 21.7% 226 CHRISTIAN 827 92.2% 70 7.8% 897 DADE 85 93.4% 6 6.6% 91 DALLAS 327 97.0% 10 3.0% 337 DOUGLAS 94 61.4% 59 38.6% 153 GREENE 2,725 57.4% 2,026 42.6% 4,751 HENRY 287 87.5% 41 12.5% 328 HICKORY 75 96.2% 3 3.8% 78 JASPER 1,478 87.0% 221 13.0% 1,699 LACLEDE 496 71.1% 202 28.9% 698 LAWRENCE 378 68.0% 178 32.0% 556 MCDONALD 195 60.9% 125 39.1% 320 MILLER 334 90.0% 37 10.0% 371 MONITEAU 171 90.0% 19 10.0% 190 MORGAN 222 83.1% 45 16.9% 267 NEWTON 467 69.2% 208 30.8% 675 OZARK 67 70.5% 28 29.5% 95 POLK 564 96.9% 18 3.1% 582 ST. CLAIR 134 95.7% 6 4.3% 140 STONE 175 54.3% 147 45.7% 322 TANEY 756 92.8% 59 7.2% 815 VERNON 253 83.2% 51 16.8% 304 WEBSTER 449 88.7% 57 11.3% 506 WRIGHT 248 70.1% 106 29.9% 354 *REGION TOTAL* 12,147 74.7% 4,124 25.3% 16,271

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 5,603 72.6% 2,113 27.4% 7,716 *REGION TOTAL* 5,603 72.6% 2,113 27.4% 7,716

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 2,732 65.8% 1,418 34.2% 4,150 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 4,834 73.7% 1,721 26.3% 6,555 *REGION TOTAL* 7,566 70.7% 3,139 29.3% 10,705

OTHER OUT HOME INV 2,489 97.7% 59 2.3% 2,548 *REGION TOTAL* 2,489 97.7% 59 2.3% 2,548

STATE TOTAL 52,793 77.6% 15,197 22.4% 67,990

TOTAL0 - 45 DAYS OVER 45 DAYS


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 6. CA/N Incidents and Referrals during FY 2015

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 150 2 17 1 0 170 ATCHISON 28 0 5 5 0 38 BUCHANAN 1,519 67 183 80 0 1,849 CALDWELL 99 4 7 5 0 115 CARROLL 120 5 4 3 0 132 CASS 921 54 113 57 0 1,145 CHARITON 93 2 7 11 0 113 CLAY 1,994 100 287 78 0 2,459 CLINTON 240 8 15 20 0 283 COOPER 187 4 26 12 0 229 DAVIESS 98 2 9 4 0 113 DE KALB 105 2 12 12 0 131

GENTRY 62 2 5 3 0 72GRUNDY 143 11 16 11 0 181

HARRISON 114 4 6 14 0 138 HOLT 46 1 12 5 0 64 JOHNSON 455 36 45 32 0 568 LAFAYETTE 348 26 33 17 0 424 LINN 156 12 12 10 0 190 LIVINGSTON 145 13 9 15 0 182 MERCER 32 1 4 0 0 37 NODAWAY 185 2 17 18 0 222 PETTIS 586 22 50 34 0 692 PLATTE 642 35 56 28 0 761 PUTNAM 56 0 2 4 0 62 RAY 329 22 28 4 0 383 SALINE 264 8 43 16 0 331 SULLIVAN 79 3 8 5 0 95 WORTH 14 1 3 1 0 19 *REGION TOTAL* 9,210 449 1,034 505 0 11,198

NORTHEAST ADAIR 312 7 28 23 0 370 AUDRAIN 363 5 42 29 0 439 BOONE 1,572 66 193 177 0 2,008 CALLAWAY 697 32 61 72 0 862 CLARK 71 1 5 6 0 83 COLE 775 80 92 105 0 1,052 FRANKLIN 1,148 113 106 92 0 1,459 GASCONADE 183 13 23 15 0 234 HOWARD 88 5 18 9 0 120 JEFFERSON 1,941 131 183 174 0 2,429 KNOX 33 1 1 0 0 35 LEWIS 121 3 19 6 0 149 LINCOLN 698 37 79 41 0 855 MACON 169 3 9 13 0 194 MARION 377 11 45 32 0 465 MONROE 69 1 7 6 0 83 MONTGOMERY 156 5 12 18 0 191 OSAGE 98 7 4 6 0 115 PIKE 194 4 13 13 0 224 RALLS 78 1 13 5 0 97 RANDOLPH 377 9 43 50 0 479 SCHUYLER 46 2 2 0 0 50 SCOTLAND 27 0 4 3 0 34 SHELBY 72 3 13 7 0 95 ST. CHARLES 2,291 75 245 149 0 2,760 WARREN 455 24 45 24 0 548 *REGION TOTAL* 12,411 639 1,305 1,075 0 15,430

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 144 5 14 12 0 175 BUTLER 684 59 67 59 0 869 CAPE GIRARDEAU 638 46 63 68 0 815 CARTER 92 7 6 7 0 112 CRAWFORD 379 10 27 40 0 456 DENT 232 12 26 26 0 296 DUNKLIN 519 24 53 28 0 624

INCIDENTS

NEWBORNCRISIS

ASSESSMENT

NON-CARETAKERREFERRAL

PREVENTIVESERVICE

REFERRAL

NON-CA/NFATALITYREFERRAL TOTAL


Child Abuse and NeglectTable 6. (continued) CA/N Incidents and Referrals during FY 2015

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 674 32 53 55 0 814 IRON 124 3 13 14 0 154 MADISON 161 8 20 11 0 200

MARIES 88 4 12 8 0 112 MISSISSIPPI 184 8 10 12 0 214 NEW MADRID 284 9 25 23 0 341 OREGON 144 13 18 7 0 182 PEMISCOT 352 9 26 32 0 419 PERRY 165 2 15 10 0 192 PHELPS 540 27 49 82 0 698 PULASKI 579 41 67 68 0 755 REYNOLDS 88 1 10 14 0 113 RIPLEY 210 17 22 14 0 263 SCOTT 592 26 59 28 0 705 SHANNON 114 6 8 9 0 137 ST. FRANCOIS 934 48 86 69 0 1,137 STE. GENEVIEVE 164 3 10 10 0 187 STODDARD 319 15 23 47 0 404 TEXAS 373 18 44 25 0 460 WASHINGTON 373 15 26 16 0 430 WAYNE 196 10 12 12 0 230 *REGION TOTAL* 9,346 478 864 806 0 11,494

SOUTHWEST BARRY 441 33 50 54 0 578 BARTON 167 7 10 14 0 198 BATES 199 10 18 11 0 238 BENTON 203 8 18 20 0 249 CAMDEN 522 20 54 48 0 644 CEDAR 227 10 21 13 0 271 CHRISTIAN 899 33 149 74 0 1,155 DADE 92 5 9 12 0 118 DALLAS 337 11 37 19 0 404 DOUGLAS 158 10 22 21 0 211 GREENE 4,828 271 443 454 0 5,996 HENRY 329 9 23 33 0 394 HICKORY 79 3 9 7 0 98 JASPER 1,707 80 165 140 0 2,092 LACLEDE 698 39 58 88 0 883 LAWRENCE 575 24 48 55 0 702 MCDONALD 322 14 26 22 0 384 MILLER 371 18 43 37 0 469 MONITEAU 190 5 21 11 0 227 MORGAN 270 8 18 14 0 310 NEWTON 676 28 59 72 0 835 OZARK 97 7 13 11 0 128 POLK 585 35 94 61 0 775 ST. CLAIR 140 4 14 5 0 163 STONE 348 11 36 47 0 442 TANEY 817 52 69 103 0 1,041 VERNON 304 12 15 20 0 351 WEBSTER 516 19 68 29 0 632 WRIGHT 360 15 32 48 0 455 *REGION TOTAL* 16,457 801 1,642 1,543 0 20,443

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 7,752 893 923 677 0 10,245 *REGION TOTAL* 7,752 893 923 677 0 10,245

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 4,198 392 392 270 0 5,252 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 6,602 445 761 437 0 8,245 *REGION TOTAL* 10,800 837 1,153 707 0 13,497

OTHER OUT HOME INV 2,563 0 0 0 0 2,563OUT OF STATE 84 0 0 0 0 84

STAT UNIT 0 0 0 0 918 918*REGION TOTAL* 2,647 0 0 0 918 3,565

STATE TOTAL 68,623 4,097 6,921 5,313 918 85,872

CRISIS CARETAKER SERVICE FATALITYNEWBORN NON- PREVENTIVE NON-CA/N

TOTALINCIDENTS ASSESSMENT REFERRAL REFERRAL REFERRAL



Figure 1. Conclusions of CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed during FY 2015

Figure 2. Time Between Report and Initial Child Contact during FY 2015

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis Statewide

Substantiated Unsub. PSI/Unsub. Family Assess. Other

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours



Figure 3. Number of Days to Complete Investigations/Assessments during FY 2015

Figure 4. Investigations with Substantiated Conclusions during FY 2015

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00


Ch

ildre

n P

er T

ho

usa

nd



Fiscal Year Incidents*

FY 2011 59,992 89,647

FY 2012 62,897 4.8% 93,242 4.0%

FY 2013 61,765 -1.8% 91,812 -1.5%

FY 2014 68,234 10.5% 102,100 11.2%

FY 2015 68,623 0.6% 100,625 -1.4%

* Changes may be noted from previous annual reports due to record updates.

Table 7. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children

FY 2011 - 2015

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Percent Change

from Prior YearChildren*

FY 2011 - 2015

Figure 5. Reported CA/N Incidents and Children

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Inci

de

nts

/Ch

ildre

n

Incidents Children



Fiscal Year Substantiated*

Family

Assessment

FY 2011 4,315 26,466

FY 2012 4,637 7.5% 29,869 12.9%

FY 2013 4,349 -6.2% 31,110 4.2%

FY 2014 4,439 2.1% 36,071 15.9%

FY 2015 4,360 -1.8% 37,168 3.0%


Table 8. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Family Assessment Findings

FY 2011 - 2015

Figure 6. CA/N Incidents with Substantiated or Family Assessment Findings

FY 2011 - FY 2015

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Percent Change

from Prior Year

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Inci

de

nts

Substantiated Family Assessment



Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures

All data for this report was compiled during October 2015.

Tables and Figures are based upon incidents and children reported during the fiscal year unless

otherwise stated.

Conclusions in Tables 2 and 3, and Figure 1 are as follows:

Substantiated: Court adjudicated and preponderance of evidence.

Unsub. PSI: Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated, a finding that insufficient

visible signs of abuse or neglect exist, but where the social worker determines

that indicators are present which, if unresolved, could potentially contribute to

child abuse and neglect.

Unsub: A finding that insufficient visible signs of abuse or neglect exist.

Family Assess: Services Needed, Services Not Needed, Noncooperative/Child Safe, Services

Needed-Linked 45 Days, and Services Needed-Family Declined.

Other: Unable to locate, inappropriate report, located out of state, home schooling.

Table 1. Fiscal years 2014 and 2015 children are based on duplicated counts.

Table 2. & Figure 4.

Number of children and children per thousand are based on duplicated counts.

Population data is based upon the US 2011 census released on April 5, 2012 by the

U.S. Census Bureau, www.census.gov.


Data does not include information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged

category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect.

Table 6. As of June 30, 2010, the process for how the Division responds to Mandated Reporter referrals

was changed. Rather than referring calls that do not meet the statutory mandate of abuse and

neglect to the field, hotline staff document the concerns and, based on the topic of the call,

provide referral contact information, as available, directly to the caller. Thus, Mandated Reporter

Referrals are no longer included in Table 6 and the total number is not comparable to prior years

in which Mandated Reporter Referrals were included.


Children are based on duplicated counts of reported incidents.


Substantiated reports include conclusions of Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence.


Family-Centered Services


Family-Centered ServicesTable 9. Cases Active during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 1 4 0 2 4 11

ATCHISON 1 2 1 0 8 12BUCHANAN 40 38 3 17 90 188CALDWELL 2 5 1 0 14 22CARROLL 3 3 0 0 4 10CASS 25 42 52 7 180 306CHARITON 1 4 9 0 20 34CLAY 11 32 20 20 130 213CLINTON 7 11 1 2 37 58COOPER 1 2 2 3 15 23DAVIESS 2 5 0 0 19 26DE KALB 1 4 0 2 21 28GENTRY 3 0 1 2 15 21GRUNDY 8 12 1 3 25 49HARRISON 6 10 0 2 12 30HOLT 0 0 0 0 4 4JOHNSON 5 37 28 4 78 152LAFAYETTE 26 17 2 6 44 95LINN 6 11 24 3 40 84LIVINGSTON 1 7 0 3 20 31MERCER 1 1 0 0 3 5NODAWAY 1 6 1 1 55 64PETTIS 16 27 6 10 56 115PLATTE 7 21 1 5 33 67PUTNAM 6 5 2 0 3 16RAY 4 6 0 6 9 25SALINE 9 17 4 6 25 61SULLIVAN 2 1 5 2 19 29WORTH 0 0 0 0 5 5* REGION TOTAL * 196 330 164 106 988 1,784

NORTHEAST ADAIR 6 15 3 3 74 101AUDRAIN 11 28 1 0 53 93BOONE 38 59 46 11 285 439CALLAWAY 27 23 7 10 106 173CLARK 3 7 6 0 40 56COLE 8 50 6 18 257 339FRANKLIN 64 71 0 19 170 324GASCONADE 5 8 0 3 36 52HOWARD 3 15 1 4 21 44JEFFERSON 122 63 30 21 618 854KNOX 1 2 0 0 11 14LEWIS 3 9 4 0 31 47LINCOLN 8 10 5 13 104 140MACON 12 15 9 2 38 76MARION 64 23 9 4 65 165MONROE 7 5 3 2 11 28MONTGOMERY 8 13 0 4 27 52OSAGE 4 4 0 1 16 25PIKE 15 15 0 3 53 86RALLS 4 6 1 0 14 25RANDOLPH 19 31 5 7 143 205SCHUYLER 2 4 3 0 19 28SCOTLAND 0 3 3 0 17 23SHELBY 4 13 2 0 17 36ST. CHARLES 39 59 13 29 440 580WARREN 17 27 2 13 58 117* REGION TOTAL * 494 578 159 167 2,724 4,122

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 7 5 0 4 58 74BUTLER 17 56 5 46 204 328CAPE GIRARDEAU 33 47 3 39 205 327CARTER 2 1 1 3 14 21CRAWFORD 9 36 0 4 61 110DENT 4 26 0 6 46 82DUNKLIN 3 19 9 7 108 146

TOTAL CASESACTIVE

SUBSTANTIATED PREVENTIVE COURT ORDER CRISISNEWBORN

CA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENTFAMILY

ASSESSMENT


Family-Centered ServicesTable 9. (continued) Cases Active during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 22 42 0 14 135 213

IRON 3 16 0 2 44 65MADISON 3 4 0 2 35 44MARIES 1 0 1 2 11 15MISSISSIPPI 1 10 2 7 29 49NEW MADRID 1 20 0 17 97 135OREGON 2 7 0 3 19 31PEMISCOT 6 23 0 19 110 158PERRY 4 16 0 2 42 64PHELPS 9 30 5 6 209 259PULASKI 1 26 4 9 154 194REYNOLDS 1 10 1 1 28 41RIPLEY 6 17 1 4 49 77SCOTT 10 32 4 16 111 173SHANNON 6 4 0 3 21 34ST. FRANCOIS 30 41 2 13 88 174STE. GENEVIEVE 2 9 1 2 15 29STODDARD 14 20 8 8 206 256TEXAS 7 11 2 6 88 114WASHINGTON 16 23 0 6 41 86WAYNE 2 15 0 3 39 59* REGION TOTAL * 222 566 49 254 2,267 3,358

SOUTHWEST BARRY 3 26 3 3 216 251BARTON 3 2 3 4 39 51BATES 3 5 1 10 34 53BENTON 5 11 1 2 21 40CAMDEN 13 11 5 4 131 164CEDAR 2 12 2 3 42 61CHRISTIAN 4 34 7 6 151 202DADE 1 10 0 1 22 34DALLAS 2 11 0 1 43 57DOUGLAS 2 3 0 5 41 51GREENE 21 51 8 14 921 1,015HENRY 1 13 4 9 80 107HICKORY 0 4 0 0 9 13JASPER 7 83 91 37 548 766LACLEDE 23 13 2 0 209 247LAWRENCE 6 36 1 9 167 219MCDONALD 1 23 6 6 109 145MILLER 7 23 0 0 99 129MONITEAU 7 6 0 0 21 34MORGAN 21 16 1 2 58 98NEWTON 2 41 30 12 288 373OZARK 2 2 1 2 33 40POLK 4 17 3 5 117 146ST. CLAIR 2 5 1 1 25 34STONE 2 42 1 5 96 146TANEY 9 37 16 19 262 343VERNON 1 8 1 5 43 58WEBSTER 10 9 0 1 52 72WRIGHT 11 19 2 1 130 163* REGION TOTAL * 175 573 190 167 4,007 5,112

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 226 137 126 109 1,683 2,281*REGION TOTAL* 226 137 126 109 1,683 2,281

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 110 98 9 32 666 915ST. LOUIS COUNTY 387 336 80 131 825 1,759* REGION TOTAL * 497 434 89 163 1,491 2,674

OTHER OTHER 2 6 0 0 0 8* REGION TOTAL * 2 6 0 0 0 8

STATE TOTAL 1,812 2,624 777 966 13,160 19,339

NEWBORNSUBSTANTIATED PREVENTIVE COURT ORDER FAMILYCRISIS TOTAL CASES

ACTIVECA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT


Family-Centered ServicesTable 10. Persons in FCS during FY 2015 by Role

CHILD TOTAL PERSONS WITHCOUNTY ADULTS CHILDREN CARETAKERS PERSONS COURT ACTION

NORTHWEST ANDREW 33 26 0 59 3ATCHISON 22 25 0 47 17BUCHANAN 438 400 0 838 128CALDWELL 39 45 0 84 19CARROLL 25 14 0 39 7CASS 538 548 0 1,086 356CHARITON 68 62 0 130 37CLAY 458 419 1 878 217CLINTON 125 111 0 236 42COOPER 34 61 1 96 36DAVIESS 43 45 0 88 20DE KALB 57 59 0 116 35GENTRY 40 38 0 78 26GRUNDY 85 97 0 182 48HARRISON 58 71 0 129 35HOLT 11 8 0 19 6JOHNSON 253 271 1 525 182LAFAYETTE 194 173 0 367 80LINN 153 162 0 315 83LIVINGSTON 52 48 0 100 27MERCER 9 12 0 21 7NODAWAY 103 99 0 202 73PETTIS 199 241 0 440 124PLATTE 160 149 0 309 47PUTNAM 30 28 0 58 20RAY 50 56 2 108 31SALINE 119 125 0 244 76SULLIVAN 73 70 0 143 44WORTH 9 12 0 21 6* REGION TOTAL * 3,478 3,475 5 6,958 1,832

NORTHEAST ADAIR 181 183 0 364 111AUDRAIN 221 196 4 421 101BOONE 862 859 2 1,723 462CALLAWAY 356 346 2 704 261CLARK 105 110 0 215 76COLE 664 649 1 1,314 272FRANKLIN 668 656 1 1,325 357GASCONADE 107 117 1 225 58HOWARD 83 87 0 170 37JEFFERSON 1,762 1,541 7 3,310 1,073KNOX 27 26 0 53 16LEWIS 94 86 0 180 49LINCOLN 285 289 2 576 116MACON 116 115 1 232 62MARION 285 344 1 630 171MONROE 50 49 0 99 31MONTGOMERY 90 113 0 203 47OSAGE 45 51 0 96 23PIKE 177 190 0 367 96RALLS 41 51 0 92 17RANDOLPH 339 345 0 684 189SCHUYLER 44 51 0 95 31SCOTLAND 40 51 0 91 24SHELBY 52 64 0 116 41ST. CHARLES 1,165 1,140 4 2,309 397WARREN 227 237 3 467 118* REGION TOTAL * 8,086 7,946 29 16,061 4,236

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 150 141 1 292 72BUTLER 581 664 1 1,246 322CAPE GIRARDEAU 571 652 0 1,223 310CARTER 39 33 0 72 10CRAWFORD 234 253 0 487 98DENT 168 158 2 328 70DUNKLIN 217 291 1 509 203


Family-Centered ServicesTable 10. (continued) Persons in FCS during FY 2015 by Role

CHILD TOTAL PERSONS WITHCOUNTY ADULTS CHILDREN CARETAKERS PERSONS COURT ACTION

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 366 431 0 797 101IRON 138 138 0 276 68MADISON 95 88 0 183 58MARIES 30 22 0 52 16MISSISSIPPI 105 100 0 205 67NEW MADRID 247 277 1 525 108OREGON 56 70 1 127 25PEMISCOT 255 371 2 628 155PERRY 124 110 2 236 44PHELPS 461 455 4 920 268PULASKI 359 363 2 724 202REYNOLDS 85 68 0 153 30RIPLEY 145 157 0 302 93SCOTT 342 354 0 696 181SHANNON 74 53 2 129 15ST. FRANCOIS 361 333 2 696 191STE. GENEVIEVE 58 67 0 125 26STODDARD 455 456 2 913 272TEXAS 208 228 1 437 111WASHINGTON 163 161 0 324 115WAYNE 130 128 0 258 56* REGION TOTAL * 6,217 6,622 24 12,863 3,287

SOUTHWEST BARRY 440 508 1 949 291BARTON 116 99 0 215 42BATES 114 104 0 218 51BENTON 58 72 0 130 31CAMDEN 302 285 0 587 128CEDAR 104 132 0 236 51CHRISTIAN 401 377 0 778 184DADE 72 75 1 148 27DALLAS 122 102 0 224 64DOUGLAS 99 102 0 201 44GREENE 2,039 1,859 4 3,902 1,063HENRY 199 205 0 404 112HICKORY 20 27 0 47 5JASPER 1,424 1,467 7 2,898 976LACLEDE 490 502 0 992 245LAWRENCE 409 478 0 887 250MCDONALD 224 249 0 473 182MILLER 243 265 0 508 88MONITEAU 85 62 0 147 19MORGAN 193 196 0 389 74NEWTON 589 600 2 1,191 483OZARK 85 71 1 157 39POLK 266 237 1 504 109ST. CLAIR 65 63 1 129 32STONE 250 286 0 536 157TANEY 611 651 2 1,264 367VERNON 99 114 1 214 55WEBSTER 143 148 0 291 88WRIGHT 336 349 0 685 210* REGION TOTAL * 9,598 9,685 21 19,304 5,467

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 4,080 4,586 21 8,687 3,337* REGION TOTAL * 4,080 4,586 21 8,687 3,337

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 1,638 2,135 15 3,788 978ST. LOUIS COUNTY 3,116 3,801 22 6,939 1,623* REGION TOTAL * 4,754 5,936 37 10,727 2,601

OTHER OTHER 12 13 0 25 1

* REGION TOTAL * 12 13 0 25 1

STATE TOTAL 36,225 38,263 137 74,625 20,761


Family-Centered ServicesTable 11. Cases Opened during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 0 1 0 1 4 6

ATCHISON 0 0 1 0 4 5BUCHANAN 22 25 2 14 56 119CALDWELL 1 5 0 0 10 16CARROLL 2 1 0 0 2 5CASS 13 22 21 4 56 116CHARITON 0 1 6 0 9 16CLAY 3 15 12 9 65 104CLINTON 4 8 0 2 18 32COOPER 0 0 1 3 2 6DAVIESS 2 3 0 0 9 14DE KALB 1 3 0 0 12 16GENTRY 2 0 0 1 5 8GRUNDY 4 9 1 3 8 25HARRISON 2 8 0 1 6 17HOLT 0 0 0 0 1 1JOHNSON 1 15 13 2 32 63LAFAYETTE 12 13 1 4 22 52LINN 4 4 15 1 17 41LIVINGSTON 1 6 0 3 15 25MERCER 1 1 0 0 2 4NODAWAY 1 5 1 1 34 42PETTIS 7 19 4 8 28 66PLATTE 3 16 1 3 20 43PUTNAM 3 1 2 0 1 7RAY 1 2 0 3 6 12SALINE 4 8 1 4 14 31SULLIVAN 0 0 2 1 12 15WORTH 0 0 0 0 1 1* REGION TOTAL * 94 191 84 68 471 908

NORTHEAST ADAIR 2 6 1 1 43 53AUDRAIN 7 16 0 0 32 55BOONE 17 20 15 6 157 215CALLAWAY 10 13 2 8 49 82CLARK 2 2 2 0 19 25COLE 4 33 4 17 157 215FRANKLIN 31 37 0 12 82 162GASCONADE 2 3 0 1 21 27HOWARD 1 8 0 2 14 25JEFFERSON 67 33 15 12 267 394KNOX 0 0 0 0 3 3LEWIS 2 5 1 0 22 30LINCOLN 3 9 5 13 64 94MACON 8 9 3 1 26 47MARION 21 11 3 2 38 75MONROE 1 2 1 0 6 10MONTGOMERY 1 9 0 1 16 27OSAGE 2 4 0 1 12 19PIKE 7 8 0 2 36 53RALLS 2 3 0 0 6 11RANDOLPH 5 21 1 2 92 121SCHUYLER 0 1 1 0 9 11SCOTLAND 0 3 1 0 7 11SHELBY 1 9 2 0 12 24ST. CHARLES 26 30 4 20 259 339WARREN 8 17 1 9 36 71* REGION TOTAL * 230 312 62 110 1,485 2,199


NEWBORNPREVENTIVE COURT ORDER CRISIS FAMILY TOTAL CASESSUBSTANTIATED

OPENEDCA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT


Family-Centered ServicesTable 11. (continued) Cases Opened during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 9 24 0 7 82 122

IRON 3 7 0 2 28 40MADISON 0 4 0 2 14 20MARIES 1 0 1 1 5 8MISSISSIPPI 1 5 0 1 14 21NEW MADRID 0 7 0 8 50 65OREGON 2 6 0 3 12 23PEMISCOT 4 13 0 6 56 79PERRY 1 11 0 1 28 41PHELPS 3 19 1 5 124 152PULASKI 1 17 0 4 80 102REYNOLDS 0 6 1 1 21 29RIPLEY 4 10 0 3 31 48SCOTT 5 14 0 10 75 104SHANNON 3 3 0 3 15 24ST. FRANCOIS 3 29 1 8 51 92STE. GENEVIEVE 1 8 0 1 11 21STODDARD 10 15 6 7 119 157TEXAS 6 7 2 4 53 72WASHINGTON 6 18 0 5 22 51WAYNE 2 12 0 2 15 31* REGION TOTAL * 110 339 22 161 1,296 1,928

SOUTHWEST BARRY 1 17 3 3 123 147BARTON 0 0 0 1 19 20BATES 2 4 0 6 20 32BENTON 4 9 0 2 16 31CAMDEN 8 6 3 3 68 88CEDAR 2 10 1 2 25 40CHRISTIAN 2 20 5 5 85 117DADE 0 4 0 1 11 16DALLAS 2 8 0 0 22 32DOUGLAS 1 2 0 4 21 28GREENE 4 31 4 4 433 476HENRY 0 2 3 4 40 49HICKORY 0 3 0 0 3 6JASPER 2 39 27 24 216 308LACLEDE 8 9 1 0 142 160LAWRENCE 3 18 0 3 98 122MCDONALD 0 11 2 2 51 66MILLER 3 7 0 0 62 72MONITEAU 3 4 0 0 15 22MORGAN 7 12 0 1 40 60NEWTON 0 17 14 9 162 202OZARK 0 1 1 1 21 24POLK 1 10 2 4 77 94ST. CLAIR 1 3 1 1 14 20STONE 1 31 1 2 56 91TANEY 6 21 4 10 118 159VERNON 1 6 0 3 24 34WEBSTER 6 7 0 1 27 41WRIGHT 4 12 1 1 67 85* REGION TOTAL * 72 324 73 97 2,076 2,642

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 37 53 53 48 739 930* REGION TOTAL * 37 53 53 48 739 930

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 49 43 3 18 349 462ST. LOUIS COUNTY 180 152 33 49 396 810* REGION TOTAL * 229 195 36 67 745 1,272

OTHER OTHER 0 1 0 0 0 1

* REGION TOTAL * 0 1 0 0 0 1

STATE TOTAL 772 1,415 330 551 6,812 9,880

OPENEDCA/N SERVICES ONLY ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT

NEWBORNSUBSTANTIATED PREVENTIVE COURT ORDER CRISIS FAMILY TOTAL CASES


Family-Centered ServicesTable 12. Cases Closed during FY 2015 by Reason for Closing

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 9

ATCHISON 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4BUCHANAN 76 79.2% 20 20.8% 96CALDWELL 6 42.9% 8 57.1% 14CARROLL 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 6CASS 117 66.5% 59 33.5% 176CHARITON 8 50.0% 8 50.0% 16CLAY 45 47.4% 50 52.6% 95CLINTON 23 57.5% 17 42.5% 40COOPER 9 64.3% 5 35.7% 14DAVIESS 6 40.0% 9 60.0% 15DE KALB 5 35.7% 9 64.3% 14GENTRY 10 76.9% 3 23.1% 13GRUNDY 17 65.4% 9 34.6% 26HARRISON 11 50.0% 11 50.0% 22HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0JOHNSON 55 72.4% 21 27.6% 76LAFAYETTE 35 64.8% 19 35.2% 54LINN 31 73.8% 11 26.2% 42LIVINGSTON 7 46.7% 8 53.3% 15MERCER 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1NODAWAY 34 79.1% 9 20.9% 43PETTIS 51 71.8% 20 28.2% 71PLATTE 22 57.9% 16 42.1% 38PUTNAM 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7RAY 11 73.3% 4 26.7% 15SALINE 18 58.1% 13 41.9% 31SULLIVAN 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 13WORTH 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4* REGION TOTAL * 630 64.9% 340 35.1% 970

NORTHEAST ADAIR 38 64.4% 21 35.6% 59AUDRAIN 19 48.7% 20 51.3% 39BOONE 141 69.1% 63 30.9% 204CALLAWAY 46 57.5% 34 42.5% 80CLARK 26 78.8% 7 21.2% 33COLE 95 48.7% 100 51.3% 195FRANKLIN 112 67.5% 54 32.5% 166GASCONADE 15 55.6% 12 44.4% 27HOWARD 15 60.0% 10 40.0% 25JEFFERSON 267 69.7% 116 30.3% 383KNOX 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 11LEWIS 12 48.0% 13 52.0% 25LINCOLN 58 73.4% 21 26.6% 79MACON 32 62.7% 19 37.3% 51MARION 73 70.2% 31 29.8% 104MONROE 9 56.3% 7 43.8% 16MONTGOMERY 20 60.6% 13 39.4% 33OSAGE 10 66.7% 5 33.3% 15PIKE 42 75.0% 14 25.0% 56RALLS 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 14RANDOLPH 57 52.8% 51 47.2% 108SCHUYLER 15 78.9% 4 21.1% 19SCOTLAND 11 91.7% 1 8.3% 12SHELBY 14 58.3% 10 41.7% 24ST. CHARLES 291 75.6% 94 24.4% 385WARREN 29 43.3% 38 56.7% 67* REGION TOTAL * 1,468 65.8% 762 34.2% 2,230

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 26 57.8% 19 42.2% 45BUTLER 131 57.0% 99 43.0% 230CAPE GIRARDEAU 102 60.4% 67 39.6% 169CARTER 6 35.3% 11 64.7% 17CRAWFORD 33 47.1% 37 52.9% 70DENT 23 56.1% 18 43.9% 41DUNKLIN 52 55.3% 42 44.7% 94

GOAL ACHIEVEDTOTAL CASES

CLOSEDOTHER


Family-Centered ServicesTable 12. (continued) Cases Closed during FY 2015 by Reason for Closing

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 89 65.9% 46 34.1% 135

IRON 19 51.4% 18 48.6% 37MADISON 15 50.0% 15 50.0% 30MARIES 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4MISSISSIPPI 22 78.6% 6 21.4% 28NEW MADRID 44 71.0% 18 29.0% 62OREGON 12 54.5% 10 45.5% 22PEMISCOT 49 52.1% 45 47.9% 94PERRY 30 76.9% 9 23.1% 39PHELPS 81 56.3% 63 43.8% 144PULASKI 50 45.9% 59 54.1% 109REYNOLDS 14 70.0% 6 30.0% 20RIPLEY 26 51.0% 25 49.0% 51SCOTT 70 68.0% 33 32.0% 103SHANNON 10 41.7% 14 58.3% 24ST. FRANCOIS 52 50.5% 51 49.5% 103STE. GENEVIEVE 10 52.6% 9 47.4% 19STODDARD 112 66.3% 57 33.7% 169TEXAS 32 49.2% 33 50.8% 65WASHINGTON 18 45.0% 22 55.0% 40WAYNE 15 53.6% 13 46.4% 28* REGION TOTAL * 1,145 57.5% 847 42.5% 1,992

SOUTHWEST BARRY 83 56.5% 64 43.5% 147BARTON 20 74.1% 7 25.9% 27BATES 18 66.7% 9 33.3% 27BENTON 9 36.0% 16 64.0% 25CAMDEN 62 65.3% 33 34.7% 95CEDAR 24 66.7% 12 33.3% 36CHRISTIAN 72 60.5% 47 39.5% 119DADE 13 68.4% 6 31.6% 19DALLAS 18 51.4% 17 48.6% 35DOUGLAS 18 60.0% 12 40.0% 30GREENE 311 54.9% 256 45.1% 567HENRY 41 74.5% 14 25.5% 55HICKORY 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 9JASPER 238 67.4% 115 32.6% 353LACLEDE 90 61.2% 57 38.8% 147LAWRENCE 79 59.8% 53 40.2% 132MCDONALD 48 66.7% 24 33.3% 72MILLER 47 61.8% 29 38.2% 76MONITEAU 13 59.1% 9 40.9% 22MORGAN 49 67.1% 24 32.9% 73NEWTON 160 78.0% 45 22.0% 205OZARK 13 50.0% 13 50.0% 26POLK 49 66.2% 25 33.8% 74ST. CLAIR 6 33.3% 12 66.7% 18STONE 41 51.3% 39 48.8% 80TANEY 106 55.8% 84 44.2% 190VERNON 17 54.8% 14 45.2% 31WEBSTER 26 61.9% 16 38.1% 42WRIGHT 58 66.7% 29 33.3% 87* REGION TOTAL * 1,734 61.5% 1,085 38.5% 2,819

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 742 70.0% 318 30.0% 1,060* REGION TOTAL * 742 70.0% 318 30.0% 1,060

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 351 67.8% 167 32.2% 518

ST. LOUIS COUNTY 574 70.4% 241 29.6% 815* REGION TOTAL * 925 69.4% 408 30.6% 1,333

OTHER OTHER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

* REGION TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

STATE TOTAL 6,644 63.9% 3,760 36.1% 10,404

GOAL ACHIEVED OTHER CLOSEDTOTAL CASES


Family-Centered ServicesTable 13. Cases Active during FY 2015 with Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3

ATCHISON 2 22.2% 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 4 44.4% 9BUCHANAN 17 20.7% 24 29.3% 14 17.1% 27 32.9% 82CALDWELL 5 38.5% 2 15.4% 4 30.8% 2 15.4% 13CARROLL 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 7CASS 35 14.3% 22 9.0% 32 13.1% 155 63.5% 244CHARITON 2 8.7% 6 26.1% 4 17.4% 11 47.8% 23CLAY 29 20.7% 15 10.7% 24 17.1% 72 51.4% 140CLINTON 5 15.6% 6 18.8% 5 15.6% 16 50.0% 32COOPER 1 5.0% 3 15.0% 4 20.0% 12 60.0% 20DAVIESS 4 28.6% 5 35.7% 0 0.0% 5 35.7% 14DE KALB 6 30.0% 4 20.0% 1 5.0% 9 45.0% 20GENTRY 3 16.7% 3 16.7% 6 33.3% 6 33.3% 18GRUNDY 6 20.0% 3 10.0% 3 10.0% 18 60.0% 30HARRISON 3 17.6% 5 29.4% 2 11.8% 7 41.2% 17HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 3JOHNSON 28 22.8% 19 15.4% 12 9.8% 64 52.0% 123LAFAYETTE 7 13.0% 9 16.7% 10 18.5% 28 51.9% 54LINN 6 11.1% 13 24.1% 6 11.1% 29 53.7% 54LIVINGSTON 10 52.6% 4 21.1% 1 5.3% 4 21.1% 19MERCER 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4NODAWAY 22 44.9% 8 16.3% 9 18.4% 10 20.4% 49PETTIS 19 26.0% 18 24.7% 15 20.5% 21 28.8% 73PLATTE 7 23.3% 3 10.0% 4 13.3% 16 53.3% 30PUTNAM 2 15.4% 3 23.1% 0 0.0% 8 61.5% 13RAY 3 18.8% 2 12.5% 3 18.8% 8 50.0% 16SALINE 9 21.4% 6 14.3% 6 14.3% 21 50.0% 42SULLIVAN 1 5.0% 3 15.0% 5 25.0% 11 55.0% 20WORTH 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3* REGION TOTAL * 240 20.4% 187 15.9% 176 15.0% 572 48.7% 1,175

NORTHEAST ADAIR 11 15.3% 17 23.6% 7 9.7% 37 51.4% 72AUDRAIN 7 12.1% 19 32.8% 7 12.1% 25 43.1% 58BOONE 50 17.2% 51 17.5% 43 14.8% 147 50.5% 291CALLAWAY 24 16.2% 27 18.2% 29 19.6% 68 45.9% 148CLARK 6 13.3% 7 15.6% 11 24.4% 21 46.7% 45COLE 47 28.0% 28 16.7% 28 16.7% 65 38.7% 168FRANKLIN 30 14.9% 32 15.9% 30 14.9% 109 54.2% 201GASCONADE 5 16.7% 9 30.0% 5 16.7% 11 36.7% 30HOWARD 7 33.3% 1 4.8% 2 9.5% 11 52.4% 21JEFFERSON 108 16.2% 102 15.3% 121 18.2% 334 50.2% 665KNOX 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 4 33.3% 6 50.0% 12LEWIS 9 28.1% 3 9.4% 6 18.8% 14 43.8% 32LINCOLN 21 30.0% 15 21.4% 10 14.3% 24 34.3% 70MACON 19 32.2% 18 30.5% 11 18.6% 11 18.6% 59MARION 14 14.4% 15 15.5% 12 12.4% 56 57.7% 97MONROE 2 8.0% 3 12.0% 6 24.0% 14 56.0% 25MONTGOMERY 11 32.4% 6 17.6% 6 17.6% 11 32.4% 34OSAGE 3 23.1% 5 38.5% 2 15.4% 3 23.1% 13PIKE 11 20.4% 16 29.6% 10 18.5% 17 31.5% 54RALLS 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 9 81.8% 11RANDOLPH 45 30.0% 26 17.3% 20 13.3% 59 39.3% 150SCHUYLER 3 13.6% 5 22.7% 6 27.3% 8 36.4% 22SCOTLAND 3 20.0% 4 26.7% 1 6.7% 7 46.7% 15SHELBY 10 37.0% 6 22.2% 6 22.2% 5 18.5% 27ST. CHARLES 57 21.8% 41 15.6% 37 14.1% 127 48.5% 262WARREN 24 33.8% 20 28.2% 3 4.2% 24 33.8% 71* REGION TOTAL * 528 19.9% 479 18.1% 423 15.9% 1,223 46.1% 2,653

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 15 29.4% 12 23.5% 10 19.6% 14 46.1% 51BUTLER 36 19.5% 47 25.4% 36 19.5% 66 35.7% 185CAPE GIRARDEAU 50 26.0% 38 19.8% 34 17.7% 70 36.5% 192CARTER 3 33.3% 3 33.3% 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 9CRAWFORD 14 25.9% 12 22.2% 6 11.1% 22 40.7% 54DENT 7 15.9% 12 27.3% 9 20.5% 16 36.4% 44DUNKLIN 41 39.8% 16 15.5% 29 28.2% 17 16.5% 103

0 - 4 MONTHS 4 - 8 MONTHS 8 - 12 MONTHS 12 + MONTHS TOTAL


Family-Centered ServicesTable 13. (continued) Cases Active during FY 2015 with Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 11 17.2% 18 28.1% 11 17.2% 24 37.5% 64

IRON 13 33.3% 7 17.9% 5 12.8% 14 35.9% 39MADISON 8 25.0% 4 12.5% 2 6.3% 18 56.3% 32MARIES 2 16.7% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 4 33.3% 12MISSISSIPPI 6 17.6% 6 17.6% 7 20.6% 15 44.1% 34NEW MADRID 11 19.0% 5 8.6% 12 20.7% 30 51.7% 58OREGON 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 2 20.0% 5 50.0% 10PEMISCOT 21 28.0% 7 9.3% 13 17.3% 34 45.3% 75PERRY 10 31.3% 8 25.0% 3 9.4% 11 34.4% 32PHELPS 51 27.3% 38 20.3% 38 20.3% 60 32.1% 187PULASKI 23 17.8% 26 20.2% 20 15.5% 60 46.5% 129REYNOLDS 4 16.7% 6 25.0% 6 25.0% 8 33.3% 24RIPLEY 14 28.0% 19 38.0% 7 14.0% 10 20.0% 50SCOTT 24 24.5% 24 24.5% 24 24.5% 26 26.5% 98SHANNON 7 58.3% 1 8.3% 3 25.0% 1 8.3% 12ST. FRANCOIS 26 23.0% 12 10.6% 18 15.9% 57 50.4% 113STE. GENEVIEVE 4 28.6% 4 28.6% 2 14.3% 4 28.6% 14STODDARD 56 32.0% 50 28.6% 31 17.7% 38 21.7% 175TEXAS 13 21.3% 15 24.6% 8 13.1% 25 41.0% 61WASHINGTON 20 30.3% 9 13.6% 12 18.2% 25 37.9% 66WAYNE 5 16.1% 8 25.8% 5 16.1% 13 41.9% 31* REGION TOTAL * 496 25.4% 412 21.1% 357 18.3% 689 35.3% 1,954

SOUTHWEST BARRY 46 25.0% 40 21.7% 34 18.5% 64 34.8% 184BARTON 1 3.3% 7 23.3% 6 20.0% 16 53.3% 30BATES 15 48.4% 1 3.2% 7 22.6% 8 25.8% 31BENTON 14 51.9% 6 22.2% 1 3.7% 6 22.2% 27CAMDEN 14 14.6% 12 12.5% 17 17.7% 53 55.2% 96CEDAR 6 20.7% 6 20.7% 9 31.0% 8 27.6% 29CHRISTIAN 30 23.6% 32 25.2% 22 17.3% 43 33.9% 127DADE 5 27.8% 3 16.7% 3 16.7% 7 38.9% 18DALLAS 6 15.4% 12 30.8% 4 10.3% 17 43.6% 39DOUGLAS 5 15.2% 10 30.3% 7 21.2% 11 33.3% 33GREENE 108 16.2% 84 12.6% 91 13.6% 384 57.6% 667HENRY 12 16.4% 8 11.0% 12 16.4% 41 56.2% 73HICKORY 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 5JASPER 91 15.5% 75 12.8% 72 12.2% 350 59.5% 588LACLEDE 32 23.4% 24 17.5% 18 13.1% 63 46.0% 137LAWRENCE 23 15.8% 31 21.2% 30 20.5% 62 42.5% 146MCDONALD 19 15.8% 27 22.5% 18 15.0% 56 46.7% 120MILLER 15 23.1% 8 12.3% 7 10.8% 35 53.8% 65MONITEAU 5 33.3% 3 20.0% 4 26.7% 3 20.0% 15MORGAN 10 22.7% 18 40.9% 2 4.5% 14 31.8% 44NEWTON 75 23.3% 63 19.6% 82 25.5% 102 31.7% 322OZARK 7 28.0% 4 16.0% 4 16.0% 10 40.0% 25POLK 23 25.8% 21 23.6% 14 15.7% 31 34.8% 89ST. CLAIR 5 25.0% 4 20.0% 2 10.0% 9 45.0% 20STONE 26 28.3% 18 19.6% 17 18.5% 31 33.7% 92TANEY 39 16.4% 26 10.9% 34 14.3% 139 58.4% 238VERNON 6 20.7% 7 24.1% 7 24.1% 9 31.0% 29WEBSTER 11 21.6% 7 13.7% 14 27.5% 19 37.3% 51WRIGHT 27 22.3% 22 18.2% 23 19.0% 49 40.5% 121* REGION TOTAL * 677 19.6% 579 16.7% 563 16.3% 1,642 47.4% 3,461

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 291 15.4% 190 10.1% 238 12.6% 1,165 61.8% 1,884* REGION TOTAL * 291 15.4% 190 10.1% 238 12.6% 1,165 61.8% 1,884

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 128 22.9% 78 14.0% 70 12.5% 283 50.6% 559ST. LOUIS COUNTY 168 15.9% 150 14.2% 128 12.1% 613 57.9% 1,059* REGION TOTAL * 296 18.3% 228 14.1% 198 12.2% 896 55.4% 1,618

OTHER OTHER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2

* REGION TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2

STATE TOTAL 2,528 19.8% 2,075 16.3% 1,955 15.3% 6,187 48.5% 12,747



Family-Centered ServicesTable 14. Cases Active during FY 2015 with No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 8

ATCHISON 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 3BUCHANAN 46 43.4% 43 40.6% 8 7.5% 9 8.5% 106CALDWELL 5 55.6% 3 33.3% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9CARROLL 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 3CASS 35 56.5% 22 35.5% 1 1.6% 4 6.5% 62CHARITON 6 54.5% 2 18.2% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 11CLAY 32 43.8% 31 42.5% 8 11.0% 2 2.7% 73CLINTON 14 53.8% 11 42.3% 0 0.0% 1 3.8% 26COOPER 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3DAVIESS 7 58.3% 5 41.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12DE KALB 7 87.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 8GENTRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3GRUNDY 12 63.2% 7 36.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 19HARRISON 7 53.8% 4 30.8% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 13HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1JOHNSON 15 51.7% 7 24.1% 5 17.2% 2 6.9% 29LAFAYETTE 29 70.7% 10 24.4% 2 4.9% 0 0.0% 41LINN 12 40.0% 11 36.7% 4 13.3% 3 10.0% 30LIVINGSTON 5 41.7% 5 41.7% 2 16.7% 0 0.0% 12MERCER 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1NODAWAY 10 66.7% 4 26.7% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 15PETTIS 28 66.7% 13 31.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 42PLATTE 18 48.6% 16 43.2% 3 8.1% 0 0.0% 37PUTNAM 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3RAY 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9SALINE 14 73.7% 3 15.8% 1 5.3% 1 5.3% 19SULLIVAN 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9WORTH 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2* REGION TOTAL * 324 53.2% 208 34.2% 48 7.9% 29 4.8% 609

NORTHEAST ADAIR 18 62.1% 10 34.5% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% 29AUDRAIN 14 40.0% 17 48.6% 3 8.6% 1 2.9% 35BOONE 57 38.5% 59 39.9% 15 10.1% 17 11.5% 148CALLAWAY 15 60.0% 8 32.0% 2 8.0% 0 0.0% 25CLARK 7 63.6% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 11COLE 110 64.3% 50 29.2% 9 5.3% 2 1.2% 171FRANKLIN 62 50.4% 40 32.5% 14 11.4% 7 5.7% 123GASCONADE 10 45.5% 8 36.4% 2 9.1% 2 9.1% 22HOWARD 21 91.3% 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23JEFFERSON 81 42.9% 56 29.6% 28 14.8% 24 12.7% 189KNOX 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2LEWIS 9 60.0% 5 33.3% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 15LINCOLN 39 55.7% 25 35.7% 4 5.7% 2 2.9% 70MACON 8 47.1% 6 35.3% 1 5.9% 2 11.8% 17MARION 43 63.2% 20 29.4% 3 4.4% 2 2.9% 68MONROE 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3MONTGOMERY 4 22.2% 9 50.0% 4 22.2% 1 5.6% 18OSAGE 9 75.0% 3 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12PIKE 10 31.3% 19 59.4% 2 6.3% 1 3.1% 32RALLS 8 57.1% 5 35.7% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 14RANDOLPH 42 76.4% 12 21.8% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 55SCHUYLER 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6SCOTLAND 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8SHELBY 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9ST. CHARLES 211 66.4% 84 26.4% 16 5.0% 7 2.2% 318WARREN 32 69.6% 10 21.7% 4 8.7% 0 0.0% 46* REGION TOTAL * 829 56.4% 460 31.3% 110 7.5% 70 4.8% 1,469

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 13 56.5% 9 39.1% 0 0.0% 1 4.3% 23BUTLER 54 37.8% 56 39.2% 21 14.7% 12 8.4% 143CAPE GIRARDEAU 51 37.8% 45 33.3% 23 17.0% 16 11.9% 135CARTER 11 91.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 12CRAWFORD 21 37.5% 27 48.2% 5 8.9% 3 5.4% 56DENT 8 21.1% 11 28.9% 10 26.3% 9 23.7% 38DUNKLIN 27 62.8% 13 30.2% 3 7.0% 0 0.0% 43



Family-Centered ServicesTable 14. (continued) Cases Active during FY 2015 with No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 64 43.0% 57 38.3% 15 10.1% 13 8.7% 149

IRON 14 53.8% 8 30.8% 3 11.5% 1 3.8% 26MADISON 8 66.7% 3 25.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 12MARIES 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 3MISSISSIPPI 4 26.7% 7 46.7% 2 13.3% 2 13.3% 15NEW MADRID 16 20.8% 20 26.0% 21 27.3% 20 26.0% 77OREGON 18 85.7% 2 9.5% 1 4.8% 0 0.0% 21PEMISCOT 23 27.7% 22 26.5% 17 20.5% 21 25.3% 83PERRY 11 34.4% 14 43.8% 5 15.6% 2 6.3% 32PHELPS 36 50.0% 29 40.3% 5 6.9% 2 2.8% 72PULASKI 41 63.1% 22 33.8% 2 3.1% 0 0.0% 65REYNOLDS 13 76.5% 4 23.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 17RIPLEY 15 55.6% 9 33.3% 3 11.1% 0 0.0% 27SCOTT 28 37.3% 29 38.7% 14 18.7% 4 5.3% 75SHANNON 16 72.7% 5 22.7% 1 4.5% 0 0.0% 22ST. FRANCOIS 31 50.8% 20 32.8% 9 14.8% 1 1.6% 61STE. GENEVIEVE 9 60.0% 6 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 15STODDARD 44 54.3% 25 30.9% 9 11.1% 3 3.7% 81TEXAS 27 50.9% 17 32.1% 6 11.3% 3 5.7% 53WASHINGTON 12 60.0% 7 35.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.0% 20WAYNE 7 25.0% 15 53.6% 4 14.3% 2 7.1% 28* REGION TOTAL * 623 44.4% 483 34.4% 179 12.7% 119 8.5% 1,404

SOUTHWEST BARRY 28 41.8% 26 38.8% 9 13.4% 4 6.0% 67BARTON 4 19.0% 10 47.6% 3 14.3% 4 19.0% 21BATES 11 50.0% 8 36.4% 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 22BENTON 9 69.2% 3 23.1% 0 0.0% 1 7.7% 13CAMDEN 32 47.1% 20 29.4% 10 14.7% 6 8.8% 68CEDAR 8 25.0% 17 53.1% 6 18.8% 1 3.1% 32CHRISTIAN 39 52.0% 28 37.3% 4 5.3% 4 5.3% 75DADE 6 37.5% 6 37.5% 2 12.5% 2 12.5% 16DALLAS 12 66.7% 4 22.2% 1 5.6% 1 5.6% 18DOUGLAS 12 66.7% 6 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18GREENE 185 53.2% 116 33.3% 31 8.9% 16 4.6% 348HENRY 14 41.2% 12 35.3% 6 17.6% 2 5.9% 34HICKORY 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8JASPER 68 38.2% 53 29.8% 28 15.7% 29 16.3% 178LACLEDE 85 77.3% 21 19.1% 1 0.9% 3 2.7% 110LAWRENCE 21 28.8% 35 47.9% 10 13.7% 7 9.6% 73MCDONALD 16 64.0% 8 32.0% 1 4.0% 0 0.0% 25MILLER 18 28.1% 33 51.6% 9 14.1% 4 6.3% 64MONITEAU 11 57.9% 7 36.8% 1 5.3% 0 0.0% 19MORGAN 42 77.8% 9 16.7% 3 5.6% 0 0.0% 54NEWTON 23 45.1% 17 33.3% 9 17.6% 2 3.9% 51OZARK 11 73.3% 3 20.0% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 15POLK 35 61.4% 19 33.3% 3 5.3% 0 0.0% 57ST. CLAIR 7 50.0% 5 35.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 14STONE 30 55.6% 18 33.3% 6 11.1% 0 0.0% 54TANEY 54 51.4% 29 27.6% 14 13.3% 8 7.6% 105VERNON 9 31.0% 14 48.3% 3 10.3% 3 10.3% 29WEBSTER 16 76.2% 5 23.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 21WRIGHT 21 50.0% 16 38.1% 4 9.5% 1 2.4% 42* REGION TOTAL * 832 50.4% 551 33.4% 168 10.2% 100 6.1% 1,651

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 229 57.7% 102 35.7% 31 7.1% 35 7.1% 397* REGION TOTAL * 229 57.7% 102 25.7% 31 7.8% 35 8.8% 397

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 205 57.6% 101 28.4% 27 7.6% 23 6.5% 356ST. LOUIS COUNTY 272 38.9% 207 29.6% 85 12.1% 136 19.4% 700* REGION TOTAL * 477 45.2% 308 29.2% 112 10.6% 159 15.1% 1,056

OTHER OTHER 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 6* REGION TOTAL * 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 6

STATE TOTAL 3,314 50.3% 2,112 32.0% 648 9.8% 518 7.9% 6,592




Figure 7. Family-Centered Services Cases Opened during FY 2015 by Reason for Opening

Figure 8. Family-Centered Services Cases Closed during FY 2015 by Reason for Closing

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Substantiated Preventive Services Court Order, Newborn Crisis, Family Assessment

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%


Goal Achieved Other



Fiscal Year

Cases

Active

FY 2011 18,791 10,074 9,202

FY 2012 19,721 4.9% 10,132 0.6% 9,610 4.4%

FY 2013 19,835 0.6% 9,968 -1.6% 9,863 2.6%

FY 2014 20,090 1.3% 10,292 3.3% 10,549 7.0%

FY 2015 19,331 -3.8% 9,880 -4.0% 10,404 -1.4%


Table 15. Family-Centered Services Cases Active, Opened and Closed

FY 2011 - 2015

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Percent Change

from Prior Year

FY 2011 - 2015

Figure 9. Family-Centered Services Cases Active, Opened and Closed

Cases

Opened

Cases

Closed

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Cas

es

Active Opened Closed



Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures


Counties listed are case manager counties.

Table 10. Counts of persons are unduplicated.

Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.


Close reason of "Other" includes the following:

- Client not making progress but there is no legal grounds for court intervention

- Client moved, unable to locate

- Client moved, other state notified

- Referred to other appropriate resource

Table 13. Case is listed as having court action if any individuals on the case have court

participation codes of B, C or D:

B - Supervision by CD (child not in Alternative Care)

C - Legal custody with CD (child not in Alternative Care)

D - Child placed in Alternative Care (custody and/or supervision with CD)


Out-of-Home Placement


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 16. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager

County and Last Known Placement Category

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 18.0

ATCHISON 0 1 3 0 0 4 3.38 3.3BUCHANAN 0 18 21 8 1 48 2.29 7.3CALDWELL 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.25 3.7CARROLL 0 2 2 0 0 4 1.82 5.8CASS 0 27 26 26 2 81 3.07 10.2CHARITON 0 9 3 3 0 15 8.48 7.7CLAY 1 30 29 9 3 72 1.26 6.4CLINTON 0 12 9 0 0 21 4.12 9.0COOPER 0 5 10 4 0 19 4.78 7.1DAVIESS 0 2 1 1 0 4 1.78 10.3DE KALB 0 9 4 1 1 15 6.49 8.1GENTRY 0 0 6 0 0 6 3.63 7.8GRUNDY 0 10 8 3 0 21 8.51 6.1HARRISON 0 1 7 0 0 8 3.60 4.9HOLT 0 2 0 0 0 2 2.06 12.5JOHNSON 0 5 36 13 3 57 4.73 9.5LAFAYETTE 0 8 18 1 0 27 3.30 6.0LINN 0 1 19 2 1 23 7.29 9.7LIVINGSTON 0 7 16 2 0 25 7.51 6.3MERCER 0 1 5 1 0 7 7.27 6.9NODAWAY 0 8 28 0 0 36 8.44 7.1PETTIS 0 28 23 5 1 57 5.29 8.0PLATTE 0 9 5 2 0 16 0.73 8.9PUTNAM 0 4 5 0 2 11 9.48 8.8RAY 0 6 3 1 1 11 1.87 6.7SALINE 0 3 17 1 0 21 3.89 4.0SULLIVAN 0 6 12 1 1 20 12.31 10.5WORTH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.0* REGION TOTAL * 1 215 319 84 16 635 2.93 7.9

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 13 21 4 2 40 8.05 7.4AUDRAIN 0 11 31 5 1 48 7.54 7.8BOONE 0 33 88 36 10 167 4.88 8.9CALLAWAY 0 13 60 15 6 94 9.40 7.6CLARK 0 3 19 1 0 23 13.40 9.3COLE 0 44 46 13 6 109 6.08 7.5FRANKLIN 0 33 65 3 6 107 4.26 7.0GASCONADE 0 9 9 0 0 18 5.35 6.0HOWARD 0 1 6 2 1 10 4.59 7.8JEFFERSON 3 88 286 17 9 403 7.33 7.8KNOX 0 0 6 0 0 6 5.81 8.2LEWIS 0 3 8 1 2 14 5.85 12.6LINCOLN 0 12 16 3 3 34 2.31 5.8MACON 0 6 17 1 0 24 6.35 9.1MARION 0 15 25 6 1 47 6.82 9.4MONROE 0 1 9 0 1 11 5.34 5.0MONTGOMERY 0 5 16 1 0 22 7.71 5.4OSAGE 0 2 10 0 0 12 3.50 7.0PIKE 0 17 24 0 0 41 9.98 8.0RALLS 0 3 0 1 0 4 1.68 12.5RANDOLPH 0 21 34 9 5 69 11.74 9.1SCHUYLER 0 2 3 1 0 6 5.26 9.2SCOTLAND 0 2 10 1 1 14 10.28 8.9SHELBY 0 3 11 3 0 17 10.64 11.9ST. CHARLES 1 42 76 4 7 130 1.40 7.2WARREN 0 9 23 3 3 38 4.68 7.6* REGION TOTAL * 4 391 919 130 64 1,508 4.78 7.9

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 0 2 18 1 0 21 7.20 7.5BUTLER 0 46 75 11 2 134 13.44 7.2CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 43 89 9 6 147 8.86 6.7CARTER 0 1 2 0 2 5 3.30 9.2CRAWFORD 0 13 22 8 4 47 7.83 8.6DENT 4 12 15 3 0 34 9.31 7.6DUNKLIN 0 29 68 10 1 108 13.36 7.5

ADOPTIVEHOME

FOSTERHOME

RELATIVEHOME

GROUP HOME/ENTRIES PER 1,000 AGE

AVERAGEENTRIESTOTALRES. CARE OTHER


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 16. (continued) Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager

County and Last Known Placement Category

COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 0 21 28 3 3 55 5.47 8.1

IRON 0 4 6 4 0 14 5.83 6.1MADISON 0 7 3 0 1 11 3.75 6.3MARIES 0 0 5 1 0 6 2.79 8.6MISSISSIPPI 0 6 15 2 0 23 7.21 7.5NEW MADRID 0 4 18 3 0 25 5.54 6.7OREGON 0 6 1 0 0 7 2.89 6.4PEMISCOT 0 13 35 2 1 51 10.13 6.9PERRY 0 5 9 4 1 19 3.99 7.0PHELPS 0 18 72 18 4 112 11.44 4.3PULASKI 0 30 25 9 2 66 5.26 6.5REYNOLDS 0 3 16 3 0 22 14.36 7.0RIPLEY 0 3 31 4 1 39 11.79 6.9SCOTT 0 21 66 1 2 90 9.14 6.5SHANNON 0 0 4 0 0 4 2.03 7.0STODDARD 0 37 59 23 5 124 18.15 7.9ST. FRANCOIS 0 27 28 9 0 64 4.44 7.0STE. GENEVIEVE 0 6 1 1 0 8 1.90 4.3TEXAS 0 11 29 1 2 43 7.52 7.2WASHINGTON 0 25 8 5 2 40 6.60 7.0WAYNE 0 2 4 2 1 9 3.21 8.0* REGION TOTAL * 4 395 752 137 40 1,328 8.04 7.3

SOUTHWEST BARRY 0 36 77 19 4 136 15.74 7.1BARTON 0 10 9 6 1 26 8.09 9.0BATES 0 10 15 0 0 25 5.88 7.4BENTON 0 5 2 6 1 14 4.07 12.9CAMDEN 0 17 19 3 1 40 4.77 8.2CEDAR 0 5 11 2 1 19 5.74 10.5CHRISTIAN 0 21 37 6 5 69 3.26 7.8DADE 0 4 4 3 0 11 6.16 10.2DALLAS 0 21 18 3 2 44 10.55 6.9DOUGLAS 0 4 5 1 2 12 3.92 11.1GREENE 0 140 116 33 14 303 5.19 6.7HENRY 0 18 13 3 5 39 7.87 10.2HICKORY 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.60 1.0JASPER 3 86 149 32 13 283 9.35 7.6LACLEDE 0 24 46 6 1 77 8.64 8.3LAWRENCE 0 23 52 21 9 105 10.32 8.6MCDONALD 0 36 39 7 1 83 12.82 10.3MILLER 0 11 11 4 0 26 4.23 7.6MONITEAU 0 1 2 2 0 5 1.27 10.6MORGAN 0 4 10 1 0 15 3.31 7.3NEWTON 0 88 131 30 9 258 17.48 8.5OZARK 0 6 15 0 2 23 11.80 6.0POLK 0 20 18 4 4 46 6.00 6.5ST. CLAIR 0 3 10 3 0 16 8.16 11.4STONE 0 16 24 18 3 61 10.11 8.6TANEY 0 43 34 14 7 98 8.58 6.9VERNON 0 18 12 2 1 33 6.27 6.8WEBSTER 0 15 6 1 3 25 2.49 7.6WRIGHT 0 13 40 5 4 62 12.73 7.6* REGION TOTAL * 3 699 925 235 93 1,955 7.49 7.9

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 5 310 475 94 62 946 5.71 7.1* REGION TOTAL * 5 310 475 94 62 946 5.71 7.1

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 0 96 125 39 13 273 4.04 7.4ST. LOUIS COUNTY 0 168 253 37 25 483 2.06 6.7* REGION TOTAL * 0 264 378 76 38 756 2.51 7.0

STATE TOTAL 17 2,274 3,768 756 313 7,128 5.00 7.6

ENTRIES AVERAGEHOME HOME HOME RES. CARE OTHER ENTRIES PER 1,000 AGE

ADOPTIVE FOSTER RELATIVE GROUP HOME/ TOTAL


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 17. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

TOTALCOUNTY (RE)ENTRIES

NORTHWEST ANDREW 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1ATCHISON 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4BUCHANAN 41 85.4% 7 14.6% 48CALDWELL 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3CARROLL 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4CASS 68 84.0% 13 16.0% 81CHARITON 13 81.3% 3 18.8% 16CLAY 66 91.7% 6 8.3% 72CLINTON 12 57.1% 9 42.9% 21COOPER 17 89.5% 2 10.5% 19DAVIESS 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4DE KALB 14 93.3% 1 6.7% 15GENTRY 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 6GRUNDY 21 100.0% 0 0.0% 21HARRISON 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 8HOLT 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 2JOHNSON 40 70.2% 17 29.8% 57LAFAYETTE 21 77.8% 6 22.2% 27LINN 21 100.0% 0 0.0% 21LIVINGSTON 22 88.0% 3 12.0% 25MERCER 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7NODAWAY 21 58.3% 15 41.7% 36PETTIS 47 82.5% 10 17.5% 57PLATTE 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 16PUTNAM 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 11RAY 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 11SALINE 19 90.5% 2 9.5% 21SULLIVAN 17 81.0% 4 19.0% 21WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0*REGION TOTAL* 530 83.5% 105 16.5% 635

NORTHEAST ADAIR 37 84.1% 7 15.9% 44AUDRAIN 40 83.3% 8 16.7% 48BOONE 134 82.2% 29 17.8% 163CALLAWAY 89 94.7% 5 5.3% 94CLARK 19 82.6% 4 17.4% 23COLE 84 77.1% 25 22.9% 109FRANKLIN 98 91.6% 9 8.4% 107GASCONADE 18 100.0% 0 0.0% 18HOWARD 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10JEFFERSON 340 84.4% 63 15.6% 403KNOX 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 6LEWIS 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 14LINCOLN 28 80.0% 7 20.0% 35MACON 21 87.5% 3 12.5% 24MARION 34 72.3% 13 27.7% 47MONROE 11 100.0% 0 0.0% 11MONTGOMERY 20 90.9% 2 9.1% 22OSAGE 11 91.7% 1 8.3% 12PIKE 36 90.0% 4 10.0% 40RALLS 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4RANDOLPH 64 92.8% 5 7.2% 69SCHUYLER 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8SCOTLAND 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 12SHELBY 12 70.6% 5 29.4% 17ST. CHARLES 115 88.5% 15 11.5% 130WARREN 32 84.2% 6 15.8% 38*REGION TOTAL* 1,286 85.3% 222 14.7% 1,508

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 13 68.4% 6 31.6% 19BUTLER 118 88.1% 16 11.9% 134CAPE GIRARDEAU 131 87.9% 18 12.1% 149CARTER 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5CRAWFORD 42 87.5% 6 12.5% 48DENT 27 81.8% 6 18.2% 33DUNKLIN 86 79.6% 22 20.4% 108

ENTRY REENTRY


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 17. (continued) Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

TOTALCOUNTY (RE)ENTRIES

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 51 92.7% 4 7.3% 55IRON 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 14MADISON 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 11MARIES 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7MISSISSIPPI 20 83.3% 4 16.7% 24NEW MADRID 20 83.3% 4 16.7% 24OREGON 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7PEMISCOT 40 76.9% 12 23.1% 52PERRY 16 84.2% 3 15.8% 19PHELPS 101 91.0% 10 9.0% 111PULASKI 62 93.9% 4 6.1% 66REYNOLDS 21 95.5% 1 4.5% 22RIPLEY 37 94.9% 2 5.1% 39SCOTT 75 84.3% 14 15.7% 89SHANNON 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4STODDARD 105 84.7% 19 15.3% 124ST. FRANCOIS 52 78.8% 14 21.2% 66STE. GENEVIEVE 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 8TEXAS 35 81.4% 8 18.6% 43WASHINGTON 32 84.2% 6 15.8% 38WAYNE 3 33.3% 6 66.7% 9*REGION TOTAL* 1,137 85.6% 191 14.4% 1,328

SOUTHWEST BARRY 120 89.6% 14 10.4% 134BARTON 22 84.6% 4 15.4% 26BATES 21 91.3% 2 8.7% 23BENTON 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 14CAMDEN 35 87.5% 5 12.5% 40CEDAR 17 94.4% 1 5.6% 18CHRISTIAN 64 92.8% 5 7.2% 69DADE 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 12DALLAS 42 95.5% 2 4.5% 44DOUGLAS 16 84.2% 3 15.8% 19GREENE 267 88.1% 36 11.9% 303HENRY 29 76.3% 9 23.7% 38HICKORY 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1JASPER 243 85.9% 40 14.1% 283LACLEDE 67 87.0% 10 13.0% 77LAWRENCE 89 83.2% 18 16.8% 107MCDONALD 72 86.7% 11 13.3% 83MILLER 25 86.2% 4 13.8% 29MONITEAU 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 5MORGAN 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15NEWTON 208 80.6% 50 19.4% 258OZARK 20 90.9% 2 9.1% 22POLK 42 91.3% 4 8.7% 46ST. CLAIR 12 75.0% 4 25.0% 16STONE 51 83.6% 10 16.4% 61TANEY 77 78.6% 21 21.4% 98VERNON 28 84.8% 5 15.2% 33WEBSTER 22 88.0% 3 12.0% 25WRIGHT 48 85.7% 8 14.3% 56*REGION TOTAL* 1,678 85.8% 277 14.2% 1,955

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 763 80.7% 183 19.3% 946*REGION TOTAL* 763 80.7% 183 19.3% 946

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 226 81.9% 50 18.1% 276ST. LOUIS COUNTY 437 91.0% 43 9.0% 480*REGION TOTAL* 663 87.7% 93 12.3% 756

STATE TOTAL 6,057 85.0% 1,071 15.0% 7,128

ENTRY REENTRY


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 18. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Last Known Placement Category

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.48 19.0

ATCHISON 0 3 14 0 0 17 14.38 5.4BUCHANAN 0 46 44 11 3 104 4.96 8.6CALDWELL 2 14 56 2 0 74 30.78 8.2CARROLL 0 2 5 0 0 7 3.19 4.3CASS 3 87 158 74 30 352 13.34 11.3CHARITON 0 15 5 6 2 28 15.83 9.9CLAY 6 127 92 23 13 261 4.56 7.7CLINTON 0 27 29 9 0 65 12.76 9.8COOPER 0 10 13 12 2 37 9.30 11.0DAVIESS 0 9 13 4 2 28 12.43 10.8DE KALB 0 20 12 2 1 35 15.15 8.1GENTRY 0 1 15 0 1 17 10.28 7.8GRUNDY 0 20 24 6 4 54 21.89 8.9HARRISON 2 10 25 2 2 41 18.46 10.8HOLT 0 2 6 1 0 9 9.27 10.4JOHNSON 2 33 81 29 14 159 13.20 10.0LAFAYETTE 0 20 44 8 1 73 8.92 7.8LINN 0 16 33 10 3 62 19.65 10.6LIVINGSTON 0 12 20 6 5 43 12.92 9.0MERCER 0 1 5 1 0 7 7.27 6.9NODAWAY 0 14 56 1 3 74 17.36 8.5PETTIS 0 58 44 11 11 124 11.50 9.6PLATTE 1 19 15 6 4 45 2.05 10.5PUTNAM 0 10 12 3 3 28 24.14 9.7RAY 0 14 4 1 1 20 3.41 7.1SALINE 3 17 55 7 2 84 15.57 8.1SULLIVAN 0 12 21 4 3 40 24.62 9.3WORTH 0 0 6 0 0 6 13.51 9.8* REGION TOTAL * 19 620 907 239 111 1,896 8.76 9.4

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 25 62 16 8 111 22.33 9.1AUDRAIN 2 27 55 13 7 104 16.33 9.5BOONE 1 104 225 93 25 448 13.08 10.1CALLAWAY 0 45 96 39 6 186 18.59 8.8CLARK 0 17 47 9 3 76 44.26 10.4COLE 2 93 111 32 25 263 14.66 9.0FRANKLIN 0 172 168 11 44 395 15.73 9.0GASCONADE 0 20 14 2 2 38 11.30 8.1HOWARD 0 11 17 6 4 38 17.45 9.6JEFFERSON 14 263 589 45 43 954 17.35 8.7KNOX 0 1 9 0 1 11 10.66 8.7LEWIS 0 10 17 2 6 35 14.61 12.8LINCOLN 3 48 40 8 13 112 7.61 8.8MACON 0 22 36 8 9 75 19.85 10.3MARION 2 74 82 19 5 182 26.42 9.4MONROE 0 7 21 2 1 31 15.04 8.0MONTGOMERY 0 8 22 3 11 44 15.42 9.5OSAGE 0 5 13 0 1 19 5.53 8.5PIKE 0 27 41 2 3 73 17.77 8.8RALLS 0 18 5 3 1 27 11.35 10.9RANDOLPH 0 55 78 23 10 166 28.24 10.1SCHUYLER 0 5 14 2 2 23 20.18 10.5SCOTLAND 0 8 13 4 0 25 18.36 10.7SHELBY 1 6 19 3 0 29 18.16 10.7ST. CHARLES 5 160 201 28 32 426 4.59 9.5WARREN 2 35 45 5 12 99 12.18 9.4* REGION TOTAL * 32 1,266 2,040 378 274 3,990 12.65 9.3

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 0 7 33 3 4 47 16.11 8.1BUTLER 0 99 211 33 11 354 35.50 8.6CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 106 168 21 13 308 18.56 8.3CARTER 0 4 4 0 4 12 7.92 12.8CRAWFORD 0 25 38 26 4 93 15.50 10.0DENT 4 24 39 19 4 90 24.64 10.1DUNKLIN 0 54 123 19 8 204 25.24 7.9

AVERAGEHOME HOME HOME RES. CARE OTHER CHILDREN PER 1,000 AGE

ADOPTIVE FOSTER RELATIVE GROUP HOME/ TOTAL CHILDREN


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 18. (continued) Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Last Known Placement Category

COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 0 40 34 13 12 99 9.84 10.5

IRON 0 13 16 16 1 46 19.14 10.3MADISON 0 22 18 8 4 52 17.74 8.5MARIES 0 6 14 1 1 22 10.21 9.0MISSISSIPPI 0 17 29 3 4 53 16.62 7.9NEW MADRID 2 20 48 7 1 78 17.28 8.2OREGON 1 19 9 1 6 36 14.84 9.4PEMISCOT 1 40 67 12 5 125 24.83 8.0PERRY 0 10 15 8 4 37 7.77 10.7PHELPS 0 61 157 36 9 263 26.86 9.0PULASKI 6 74 69 23 10 182 14.52 8.2REYNOLDS 0 11 23 4 1 39 25.46 9.4RIPLEY 1 23 86 10 7 127 38.40 8.7SCOTT 1 47 108 5 6 167 16.95 6.8SHANNON 0 2 7 3 0 12 6.09 8.8STODDARD 0 80 107 49 9 245 35.87 9.3ST. FRANCOIS 4 105 105 36 16 266 18.46 9.1STE. GENEVIEVE 0 9 2 4 2 17 4.03 10.4TEXAS 0 34 61 11 2 108 18.88 8.6WASHINGTON 2 54 37 20 2 115 18.97 8.5WAYNE 0 22 18 13 0 53 18.89 10.2* REGION TOTAL * 22 1,028 1,646 404 150 3,250 19.67 8.7

SOUTHWEST BARRY 1 80 133 33 13 260 30.09 8.6BARTON 0 17 20 11 2 50 15.56 10.1BATES 0 13 26 2 5 46 10.81 9.2BENTON 0 21 9 11 1 42 12.22 11.6CAMDEN 0 65 37 9 16 127 15.14 10.0CEDAR 0 11 14 4 4 33 9.98 11.0CHRISTIAN 8 71 76 18 20 193 9.11 9.3DADE 0 7 9 4 0 20 11.20 10.3DALLAS 0 31 28 8 6 73 17.51 8.2DOUGLAS 0 17 17 11 6 51 16.66 11.8GREENE 45 426 396 186 107 1,160 19.87 9.3HENRY 0 54 42 12 17 125 25.22 11.0HICKORY 4 5 1 0 3 13 7.81 9.2JASPER 11 302 390 92 54 849 28.04 9.6LACLEDE 4 105 106 17 15 247 27.73 9.6LAWRENCE 2 57 108 55 22 244 23.98 10.1MCDONALD 0 71 68 16 12 167 25.79 10.8MILLER 0 23 25 13 5 66 10.74 10.0MONITEAU 0 1 7 3 1 12 3.06 11.1MORGAN 0 17 20 5 5 47 10.37 10.2NEWTON 6 166 238 45 18 473 32.04 9.2OZARK 0 16 25 1 0 42 21.55 7.4POLK 4 44 33 14 15 110 14.35 9.0ST. CLAIR 0 7 16 5 5 33 16.84 12.6STONE 0 33 52 30 8 123 20.39 9.6TANEY 1 120 128 50 20 319 27.92 9.1VERNON 0 33 18 9 5 65 12.35 8.5WEBSTER 3 39 26 14 6 88 8.77 10.3WRIGHT 1 60 111 18 11 201 41.26 9.2* REGION TOTAL * 90 1,912 2,179 696 402 5,279 20.24 9.5

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 78 947 1,144 285 301 2,755 16.63 9.3* REGION TOTAL * 78 947 1,144 285 301 2,755 16.63 9.3

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 3 346 344 114 102 909 13.46 9.8ST. LOUIS COUNTY 10 463 627 127 123 1,350 5.76 9.1* REGION TOTAL * 13 809 971 241 225 2,259 7.49 9.4

STATE TOTAL 254 6,582 8,887 2,243 1,463 19,429 13.63 9.3

CHILDREN AVERAGEHOME HOME HOME RES. CARE OTHER CHILDREN PER 1,000 AGE

ADOPTIVE FOSTER RELATIVE GROUP HOME/ TOTAL



and Last Known Placement Type

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

ATCHISON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3BUCHANAN 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 6 3 1 29CALDWELL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13CARROLL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2CASS 1 0 2 15 0 0 0 0 6 6 1 4 55CHARITON 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 12CLAY 6 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 9 0 6 105CLINTON 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 19COOPER 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8DAVIESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 7DE KALB 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 16GENTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1GRUNDY 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 16HARRISON 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 8HOLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2JOHNSON 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 30LAFAYETTE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 16LINN 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 9LIVINGSTON 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11MERCER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1NODAWAY 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 8PETTIS 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 51PLATTE 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 17PUTNAM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 5RAY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13SALINE 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14SULLIVAN 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11WORTH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* REGION TOTAL * 15 0 4 53 9 1 0 0 12 41 12 19 483

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 19AUDRAIN 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 2 16BOONE 0 0 1 8 1 4 0 0 0 7 7 5 77CALLAWAY 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 4 29CLARK 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14COLE 1 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 80FRANKLIN 0 0 0 7 14 1 0 0 0 6 1 7 151GASCONADE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18HOWARD 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5JEFFERSON 7 2 5 26 0 5 0 0 0 27 13 8 189KNOX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0LEWIS 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5LINCOLN 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 43MACON 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 19MARION 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 63MONROE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4MONTGOMERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4OSAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5PIKE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 25RALLS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 15RANDOLPH 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 45SCHUYLER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3SCOTLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6SHELBY 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5ST. CHARLES 2 3 0 19 0 2 0 0 0 14 3 4 120WARREN 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 7 1 26* REGION TOTAL * 12 7 10 100 22 16 3 0 1 94 39 46 986

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7BUTLER 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 89CAPE GIRARDEAU 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 1 9 11 67CARTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3CRAWFORD 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 24DENT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24DUNKLIN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 52

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO FAH FGB FGHDET FHOFHB FHE FHM




COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 34

IRON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 12MADISON 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 17MARIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5MISSISSIPPI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17NEW MADRID 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 16OREGON 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 14PEMISCOT 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 38PERRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 8PHELPS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 54PULASKI 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 12 3 58REYNOLDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10RIPLEY 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 17SCOTT 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 41SHANNON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2STODDARD 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 73ST. FRANCOIS 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 4 2 98STE. GENEVIEVE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9TEXAS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 29WASHINGTON 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 48WAYNE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 16* REGION TOTAL * 10 0 10 9 8 1 2 0 18 15 47 57 882

SOUTHWEST BARRY 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 71BARTON 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 13BATES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 8BENTON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 16CAMDEN 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 2 49CEDAR 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10CHRISTIAN 3 0 5 7 3 1 0 0 0 5 1 5 53DADE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7DALLAS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 29DOUGLAS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15GREENE 26 5 14 29 4 3 0 0 0 36 3 20 338HENRY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 42HICKORY 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4JASPER 6 2 0 30 3 0 3 0 0 15 0 10 247LACLEDE 2 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 91LAWRENCE 1 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 46MCDONALD 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67MILLER 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18MONITEAU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1MORGAN 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 11NEWTON 6 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 156OZARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11POLK 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 43ST. CLAIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6STONE 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 27TANEY 1 0 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 96VERNON 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 31WEBSTER 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 32WRIGHT 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6 50* REGION TOTAL * 51 10 26 115 22 4 3 0 11 95 18 85 1,588

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 27 8 38 118 10 19 5 1 5 111 22 39 651* REGION TOTAL * 27 8 38 118 10 19 5 1 5 111 22 39 651

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 3 0 0 41 7 4 0 0 0 60 10 21 214ST. LOUIS COUNTY 2 1 0 61 0 5 7 0 0 60 21 25 296* REGION TOTAL * 5 1 0 102 7 9 7 0 0 120 31 46 510

STATE TOTAL 120 26 88 497 78 50 20 1 47 476 169 292 5,100

DET FAH FGB FGHADF ADO ADR CFP CTO FHB FHE FHM FHO





ATCHISON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BUCHANAN 0 2 0 6 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 10 0CALDWELL 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0CARROLL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0CASS 6 0 1 21 9 0 2 8 0 0 3 59 0CHARITON 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 5 0CLAY 0 0 0 8 4 0 1 7 0 0 0 22 0CLINTON 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0COOPER 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 10 0DAVIESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0DE KALB 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0GENTRY 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0GRUNDY 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 0HARRISON 1 0 0 6 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0HOLT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0JOHNSON 3 0 0 5 4 0 0 7 0 0 1 26 0LAFAYETTE 0 0 0 13 3 0 0 1 0 1 2 5 0LINN 1 0 0 10 4 0 0 2 0 1 1 7 0LIVINGSTON 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 2 4 0MERCER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0NODAWAY 2 0 0 8 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0PETTIS 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 8 1 0 1 9 0PLATTE 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 0PUTNAM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0RAY 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0SALINE 1 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0SULLIVAN 3 0 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0WORTH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* REGION TOTAL * 27 2 2 125 55 1 5 50 1 5 18 196 0

NORTHEAST ADAIR 1 0 0 25 2 0 1 1 0 1 3 11 0AUDRAIN 1 0 2 9 6 0 0 5 0 3 1 3 1BOONE 5 0 0 39 21 0 0 8 0 6 14 57 0CALLAWAY 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 4 0 1 4 27 0CLARK 0 0 1 25 2 0 0 2 0 3 2 3 0COLE 5 1 1 23 5 1 0 12 0 2 0 26 1FRANKLIN 8 0 1 40 6 0 0 17 0 1 1 6 0GASCONADE 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0HOWARD 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0JEFFERSON 10 0 1 80 49 0 4 13 2 4 6 28 0KNOX 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0LEWIS 3 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0LINCOLN 3 0 1 5 1 1 0 6 0 1 3 3 0MACON 5 0 0 7 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0MARION 1 1 0 18 4 0 0 4 0 4 3 9 0MONROE 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0MONTGOMERY 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 0OSAGE 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0PIKE 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0RALLS 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0RANDOLPH 4 0 0 15 4 0 1 3 0 2 1 17 0SCHUYLER 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0SCOTLAND 0 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0SHELBY 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0ST. CHARLES 7 1 1 32 6 0 1 12 0 5 5 13 0WARREN 5 0 0 7 3 0 0 5 0 0 2 3 0* REGION TOTAL * 62 3 11 360 140 2 7 113 2 36 50 232 2


RFERF3 RF4 RFAMMD MMH RF2LGSILA KHB KHM KHO KHU




COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 2 0 0 10 3 0 0 6 0 2 1 8 0

IRON 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0MADISON 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0MARIES 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0MISSISSIPPI 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0NEW MADRID 1 0 1 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0OREGON 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0PEMISCOT 2 0 0 15 4 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 0PERRY 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 0PHELPS 0 0 2 20 6 0 2 3 0 0 7 23 0PULASKI 1 2 2 9 5 0 0 7 0 0 1 20 0REYNOLDS 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0RIPLEY 1 0 0 14 9 0 1 3 0 1 2 6 0SCOTT 0 0 1 12 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 0SHANNON 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0STODDARD 1 0 0 17 5 0 2 6 0 1 4 43 0ST. FRANCOIS 7 0 0 19 1 0 0 4 0 1 3 30 0STE. GENEVIEVE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 3 0TEXAS 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 0WASHINGTON 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0WAYNE 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0* REGION TOTAL * 19 3 8 285 103 7 13 70 1 10 29 315 0

SOUTHWEST BARRY 1 0 1 16 2 0 2 6 0 0 4 24 4BARTON 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9 0BATES 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0BENTON 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 6 0CAMDEN 6 0 2 4 1 0 1 4 0 0 3 5 0CEDAR 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0CHRISTIAN 4 1 0 11 2 0 0 5 0 0 3 12 1DADE 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0DALLAS 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 6 0DOUGLAS 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 4 0 0 2 7 0GREENE 26 3 3 91 14 0 4 34 2 2 12 120 13HENRY 4 0 0 2 3 0 1 8 0 1 3 7 0HICKORY 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0JASPER 6 1 4 110 18 1 1 19 0 2 2 80 0LACLEDE 2 0 0 35 9 0 2 9 0 0 2 14 0LAWRENCE 2 1 0 22 4 2 1 11 0 0 5 35 7MCDONALD 1 0 0 21 7 0 0 6 0 0 0 16 0MILLER 2 0 1 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 7 0MONITEAU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0MORGAN 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 2 0NEWTON 5 0 0 50 39 0 0 8 0 0 2 41 0OZARK 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0POLK 3 0 0 6 0 0 1 6 0 0 3 10 1ST. CLAIR 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0STONE 0 0 0 7 4 0 0 5 0 0 4 22 3TANEY 4 0 1 28 3 0 1 6 1 2 6 33 1VERNON 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 3 2WEBSTER 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 7 0WRIGHT 1 0 1 15 6 0 1 5 0 0 2 10 0* REGION TOTAL * 83 6 13 458 128 3 16 155 3 8 65 492 32

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 63 3 2 101 79 2 5 71 0 1 20 216 0* REGION TOTAL * 63 3 2 101 79 2 5 71 0 1 20 216 0

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 18 2 1 43 11 1 5 18 3 4 10 85 1ST. LOUIS COUNTY 25 3 3 93 34 3 7 24 4 17 14 68 3* REGION TOTAL * 43 5 4 136 45 4 12 42 7 21 24 153 4

STATE TOTAL 297 22 40 1,465 550 19 58 501 14 81 206 1,604 38

RF3 RF4 RFA RFEILA KHB KHM KHO KHU LGS MMD MMH RF2





ATCHISON 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 17BUCHANAN 0 0 0 1 0 26 8 0 0 0 0 0 104CALDWELL 0 0 0 0 0 45 2 0 0 0 0 0 74CARROLL 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 7CASS 5 0 0 0 3 81 43 9 0 1 7 4 347CHARITON 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 28CLAY 0 0 0 0 0 55 25 1 0 0 1 0 261CLINTON 0 0 0 0 0 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 65COOPER 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 37DAVIESS 0 0 1 0 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 28DE KALB 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 35GENTRY 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 17GRUNDY 0 0 0 0 0 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 54HARRISON 0 0 0 0 0 10 5 0 0 0 1 0 41HOLT 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 9JOHNSON 0 0 1 0 1 53 18 1 0 0 1 1 159LAFAYETTE 0 0 0 0 0 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 73LINN 1 0 0 0 0 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 61LIVINGSTON 0 0 0 0 0 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 43MERCER 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7NODAWAY 0 0 0 0 0 27 16 0 0 0 0 0 74PETTIS 0 0 0 0 0 28 10 0 0 0 0 0 124PLATTE 0 0 0 0 1 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 45PUTNAM 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 28RAY 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 20SALINE 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 1 1 84SULLIVAN 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 40WORTH 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 6* REGION TOTAL * 6 0 2 1 6 521 195 11 0 1 11 6 1,890

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 0 1 0 0 32 3 0 0 0 0 0 111AUDRAIN 2 0 2 3 2 24 9 0 1 0 1 0 102BOONE 7 0 5 0 2 118 45 5 0 0 4 2 441CALLAWAY 4 0 2 0 0 41 44 1 0 0 1 1 182CLARK 0 0 0 0 0 14 5 0 0 0 1 1 76COLE 0 0 2 1 1 56 23 3 0 0 1 2 263FRANKLIN 0 0 0 0 0 104 17 3 0 0 3 1 395GASCONADE 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 38HOWARD 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 2 0 0 1 0 38JEFFERSON 2 1 0 0 0 331 128 8 0 0 2 3 952KNOX 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 11LEWIS 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 35LINCOLN 0 0 0 1 2 24 6 1 0 0 1 2 112MACON 0 0 0 0 0 25 3 0 0 0 1 1 75MARION 0 0 2 0 1 42 16 0 0 0 1 0 182MONROE 0 0 0 0 1 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 31MONTGOMERY 0 0 0 1 0 12 7 1 0 0 1 0 44OSAGE 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 19PIKE 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 1 0 0 0 0 73RALLS 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 27RANDOLPH 2 0 0 0 1 49 9 0 0 0 1 1 164SCHUYLER 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 23SCOTLAND 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 25SHELBY 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 29ST. CHARLES 1 0 0 0 3 122 36 8 0 0 4 2 425WARREN 0 0 0 1 3 18 13 1 0 0 0 0 99* REGION TOTAL * 18 1 14 7 16 1,095 408 34 1 0 23 17 3,972


RFH TOTALRFP RFT RHB RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS




COUNTY TOTALSOUTHEAST HOWELL 0 0 0 0 0 13 8 1 0 1 2 2 99

IRON 1 0 0 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 1 1 45MADISON 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 51MARIES 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 22MISSISSIPPI 0 0 0 0 0 21 4 0 0 0 0 0 53NEW MADRID 0 0 0 0 0 31 3 0 0 0 1 0 78OREGON 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 36PEMISCOT 0 0 0 0 1 38 9 0 0 0 0 0 125PERRY 0 0 0 0 2 8 2 2 0 0 2 1 37PHELPS 0 0 1 2 2 94 31 1 0 1 5 2 263PULASKI 0 1 0 0 1 38 12 0 0 0 1 1 182REYNOLDS 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 39RIPLEY 0 0 0 0 2 49 12 0 0 0 1 2 127SCOTT 0 0 0 0 0 72 20 0 0 1 0 1 167SHANNON 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 11STODDARD 0 0 1 0 0 61 24 0 0 0 0 0 245ST. FRANCOIS 0 0 0 0 0 81 4 0 0 0 2 3 266STE. GENEVIEVE 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17TEXAS 0 0 0 0 0 47 4 0 0 0 3 0 108WASHINGTON 0 0 0 3 0 20 6 1 0 0 0 0 115WAYNE 2 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 51* REGION TOTAL * 15 1 4 5 12 990 240 8 0 5 29 19 3,235

SOUTHWEST BARRY 0 0 0 0 0 103 11 1 0 0 1 2 260BARTON 0 0 0 0 0 12 6 0 0 0 2 0 50BATES 0 0 0 0 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 1 46BENTON 0 0 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 0 1 0 42CAMDEN 0 0 0 0 0 28 2 0 0 2 1 3 127CEDAR 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 33CHRISTIAN 0 0 0 1 0 48 13 2 0 2 2 3 193DADE 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 20DALLAS 0 0 0 0 0 21 3 0 0 0 2 1 73DOUGLAS 0 0 0 0 1 8 2 0 0 1 2 1 51GREENE 18 1 4 7 7 234 37 20 0 2 14 14 1,142HENRY 0 0 0 0 0 31 6 0 0 0 1 4 125HICKORY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13JASPER 5 1 0 0 3 217 37 10 0 0 2 14 844LACLEDE 0 0 0 0 0 50 12 0 0 0 1 2 247LAWRENCE 5 0 1 0 2 74 5 1 0 3 2 1 239MCDONALD 0 0 0 0 0 30 10 0 0 0 0 3 167MILLER 1 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 2 0 65MONITEAU 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 12MORGAN 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 47NEWTON 0 0 1 0 0 107 42 1 0 0 1 0 473OZARK 1 0 0 0 3 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 41POLK 0 0 0 0 0 21 6 2 0 0 0 3 110ST. CLAIR 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 33STONE 0 0 1 0 0 29 12 1 0 2 0 0 123TANEY 2 1 0 0 1 88 7 3 0 2 4 2 317VERNON 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 0 0 0 3 0 65WEBSTER 0 0 4 0 0 17 3 2 0 1 2 0 88WRIGHT 4 0 0 0 0 81 8 3 0 0 2 1 197* REGION TOTAL * 36 3 12 8 18 1,308 240 48 0 15 45 56 5,243

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 31 0 4 7 2 578 372 101 0 1 13 29 2,724* REGION TOTAL * 31 0 4 7 2 578 372 101 0 1 13 29 2,724

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 2 0 1 12 0 214 61 24 0 1 8 24 907ST. LOUIS COUNTY 9 0 0 2 4 387 101 31 0 1 12 27 1,341* REGION TOTAL * 11 0 1 14 4 601 162 55 0 2 20 51 2,248

STATE TOTAL 117 5 37 42 58 5,093 1,617 257 1 24 141 178 19,312

RHU RUN SCH TLARFP RFT RHB RHM RHORFH TLG TLS


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 20. Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Length of Stay

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.0 18.0

ATCHISON 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 8 7.8 6.5BUCHANAN 19 52.8% 11 30.6% 6 16.7% 36 14.8 10.1CALDWELL 2 3.6% 18 32.1% 36 64.3% 56 28.4 8.3CARROLL 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 5.3 6.0CASS 31 24.8% 23 18.4% 71 56.8% 125 26.6 11.6CHARITON 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 3 37.0 13.0CLAY 12 13.5% 36 40.4% 41 46.1% 89 25.9 8.2CLINTON 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 6 60.0% 10 30.7 10.3COOPER 10 55.6% 5 27.8% 3 16.7% 18 11.1 9.6DAVIESS 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 5 34.6 17.0DE KALB 4 66.7% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 6 15.0 10.7GENTRY 3 37.5% 4 50.0% 1 12.5% 8 15.9 9.4GRUNDY 2 25.0% 4 50.0% 2 25.0% 8 22.9 11.1HARRISON 7 43.8% 0 0.0% 9 56.3% 16 22.3 9.7HOLT 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 24.3 10.8JOHNSON 27 40.3% 11 16.4% 29 43.3% 67 24.2 9.7LAFAYETTE 7 33.3% 0 0.0% 14 66.7% 21 25.4 7.2LINN 7 53.8% 4 30.8% 2 15.4% 13 20.1 11.3LIVINGSTON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 73.0 20.0MERCER 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 10.0 4.0NODAWAY 30 68.2% 10 22.7% 4 9.1% 44 11.0 8.4PETTIS 28 52.8% 15 28.3% 10 18.9% 53 15.2 9.1PLATTE 5 41.7% 3 25.0% 4 33.3% 12 22.7 11.5PUTNAM 2 20.0% 8 80.0% 0 0.0% 10 17.1 8.6RAY 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 11.5 6.0SALINE 1 3.0% 10 30.3% 22 66.7% 33 36.4 8.3SULLIVAN 0 0.0% 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 8 21.9 10.0WORTH 5 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 6.8 11.6TOTAL 219 32.7% 179 26.8% 271 40.5% 669 22.7 9.6

NORTHEAST ADAIR 12 24.0% 18 36.0% 20 40.0% 50 20.6 8.7AUDRAIN 7 36.8% 4 21.1% 8 42.1% 19 18.1 9.2BOONE 57 33.7% 68 40.2% 44 26.0% 169 20.1 9.5CALLAWAY 38 62.3% 17 27.9% 6 9.8% 61 12.0 9.9CLARK 6 27.3% 5 22.7% 11 50.0% 22 20.8 10.7COLE 29 34.1% 29 34.1% 27 31.8% 85 22.8 9.6FRANKLIN 13 10.7% 52 43.0% 56 46.3% 121 30.1 9.0GASCONADE 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 5 18.2 9.0HOWARD 4 57.1% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 7 20.6 12.1JEFFERSON 101 31.7% 124 38.9% 94 29.5% 319 19.2 9.3KNOX 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 5 11.8 8.0LEWIS 2 18.2% 4 36.4% 5 45.5% 11 25.1 11.6LINCOLN 14 29.8% 14 29.8% 19 40.4% 47 22.0 9.2MACON 7 20.0% 18 51.4% 10 28.6% 35 22.7 10.5MARION 18 26.1% 24 34.8% 27 39.1% 69 22.0 9.2MONROE 3 30.0% 4 40.0% 3 30.0% 10 23.3 11.2MONTGOMERY 9 45.0% 6 30.0% 5 25.0% 20 20.5 8.9OSAGE 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 47.0 13.3PIKE 21 70.0% 7 23.3% 2 6.7% 30 9.8 8.2RALLS 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 5 22.2 11.2RANDOLPH 21 40.4% 18 34.6% 13 25.0% 52 18.7 9.6SCHUYLER 7 43.8% 4 25.0% 5 31.3% 16 16.8 9.7SCOTLAND 5 33.3% 7 46.7% 3 20.0% 15 13.7 10.8SHELBY 8 57.1% 1 7.1% 5 35.7% 14 17.5 9.8ST. CHARLES 35 21.2% 67 40.6% 63 38.2% 165 24.2 9.1WARREN 17 48.6% 9 25.7% 9 25.7% 35 22.1 10.2*REGION TOTAL* 439 31.6% 511 36.7% 441 31.7% 1,391 21.0 9.4

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 7 53.8% 4 30.8% 2 15.4% 13 16.2 9.5BUTLER 65 50.0% 49 37.7% 16 12.3% 130 13.1 8.9CAPE GIRARDEAU 14 17.3% 28 34.6% 39 48.1% 81 25.0 9.1CARTER 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 3 46.3 17.0CRAWFORD 7 31.8% 6 27.3% 9 40.9% 22 20.0 11.8DENT 12 35.3% 12 35.3% 10 29.4% 34 22.0 11.1DUNKLIN 39 55.7% 30 42.9% 1 1.4% 70 10.3 7.0

AVERAGE

AVERAGEMONTHS MONTHS OR MORE TOTAL OF STAY AGE

0-11 12-23 2 YEARS MONTHS


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 20. (continued) Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Length of Stay

COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 24 72.7% 5 15.2% 4 12.1% 33 12.7 10.0

IRON 5 45.5% 5 45.5% 1 9.1% 11 14.7 11.4MADISON 3 20.0% 7 46.7% 5 33.3% 15 27.6 10.9MARIES 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 6 24.8 10.3MISSISSIPPI 9 36.0% 15 60.0% 1 4.0% 25 12.9 7.6NEW MADRID 6 26.1% 15 65.2% 2 8.7% 23 19.0 9.7OREGON 7 30.4% 7 30.4% 9 39.1% 23 26.3 9.8PEMISCOT 15 44.1% 14 41.2% 5 14.7% 34 14.3 7.5PERRY 5 41.7% 4 33.3% 3 25.0% 12 19.5 10.3PHELPS 45 50.0% 21 23.3% 24 26.7% 90 19.1 9.5PULASKI 30 48.4% 20 32.3% 12 19.4% 62 15.2 9.8REYNOLDS 7 53.8% 5 38.5% 1 7.7% 13 11.8 9.8RIPLEY 23 42.6% 13 24.1% 18 33.3% 54 20.4 8.4SCOTT 29 39.7% 33 45.2% 11 15.1% 73 15.4 7.0SHANNON 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 3.2 8.7STODDARD 84 64.1% 27 20.6% 20 15.3% 131 14.1 9.2ST. FRANCOIS 21 20.8% 42 41.6% 38 37.6% 101 25.9 8.7STE. GENEVIEVE 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 4 40.8 14.5TEXAS 5 18.5% 9 33.3% 13 48.1% 27 23.1 9.6WASHINGTON 1 6.7% 3 20.0% 11 73.3% 15 44.4 12.6WAYNE 7 53.8% 3 23.1% 3 23.1% 13 16.2 11.9*REGION TOTAL* 481 42.8% 379 33.7% 264 23.5% 1,124 18.2 9.1

SOUTHWEST BARRY 34 44.2% 26 33.8% 17 22.1% 77 17.6 9.5BARTON 10 41.7% 5 20.8% 9 37.5% 24 17.3 11.3BATES 14 66.7% 6 28.6% 1 4.8% 21 13.0 11.4BENTON 2 13.3% 4 26.7% 9 60.0% 15 28.0 8.3CAMDEN 10 27.8% 14 38.9% 12 33.3% 36 23.3 10.7CEDAR 5 29.4% 8 47.1% 4 23.5% 17 18.1 11.1CHRISTIAN 15 22.1% 27 39.7% 26 38.2% 68 22.0 9.3DADE 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 7.5 17.5DALLAS 13 65.0% 3 15.0% 4 20.0% 20 18.9 7.7DOUGLAS 6 27.3% 11 50.0% 5 22.7% 22 21.0 11.5GREENE 67 18.6% 140 38.9% 153 42.5% 360 27.4 10.6HENRY 16 35.6% 12 26.7% 17 37.8% 45 19.6 10.2HICKORY 0 0.0% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 18.7 5.6JASPER 62 22.1% 104 37.0% 115 40.9% 281 23.4 10.3LACLEDE 17 17.9% 33 34.7% 45 47.4% 95 26.2 9.3LAWRENCE 16 26.7% 24 40.0% 20 33.3% 60 21.5 10.2MCDONALD 22 41.5% 21 39.6% 10 18.9% 53 15.7 10.2MILLER 8 44.4% 3 16.7% 7 38.9% 18 23.1 11.1MONITEAU 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4 20.0 10.5MORGAN 8 66.7% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 12 11.9 8.8NEWTON 178 66.7% 59 22.1% 30 11.2% 267 11.3 9.3OZARK 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 16.0 10.3POLK 7 24.1% 11 37.9% 11 37.9% 29 25.0 10.2ST. CLAIR 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 15.7 17.0STONE 21 56.8% 12 32.4% 4 10.8% 37 12.5 8.9TANEY 23 22.1% 37 35.6% 44 42.3% 104 24.9 9.2VERNON 11 45.8% 4 16.7% 9 37.5% 24 22.5 7.7WEBSTER 10 31.3% 11 34.4% 11 34.4% 32 21.2 11.6WRIGHT 28 37.8% 30 40.5% 16 21.6% 74 18.5 9.5*REGION TOTAL* 607 33.5% 619 34.2% 584 32.3% 1,810 21.1 9.9

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 277 30.4% 300 32.9% 334 36.7% 911 22.4 9.4*REGION TOTAL* 277 30.4% 300 32.9% 334 36.7% 911 22.4 9.4

ST. LOUIS ST LOUIS CITY 88 29.5% 74 24.8% 136 45.6% 298 33.9 9.7ST LOUIS COUNTY 130 29.3% 128 28.9% 185 41.8% 443 25.8 9.9*REGION TOTAL* 218 29.4% 202 27.3% 321 43.3% 741 29.1 9.8

STATE TOTAL 2,241 33.7% 2,190 33.0% 2,215 33.3% 6,646 21.8 9.6

AVERAGEMONTHS MONTHS OR MORE TOTAL OF STAY AGE

AVERAGE0-11 12-23 2 YEARS MONTHS


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 21. Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Placement Category at Time of Exit

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 1 0 0 0 1

ATCHISON 0 0 8 0 0 8BUCHANAN 0 14 14 5 3 36CALDWELL 2 10 42 2 0 56CARROLL 0 0 3 0 0 3CASS 2 21 65 22 15 125CHARITON 0 0 2 1 0 3CLAY 4 49 32 2 2 89CLINTON 0 4 4 2 0 10COOPER 0 6 9 1 2 18DAVIESS 0 1 2 2 0 5DE KALB 0 4 1 0 1 6GENTRY 0 1 7 0 0 8GRUNDY 0 1 5 0 2 8HARRISON 0 7 9 0 0 16HOLT 0 0 4 0 0 4JOHNSON 2 10 40 11 4 67LAFAYETTE 0 10 10 0 1 21LINN 0 0 8 3 2 13LIVINGSTON 0 0 0 0 1 1MERCER 0 0 4 0 0 4NODAWAY 0 8 36 0 0 44PETTIS 0 21 27 2 3 53PLATTE 0 4 5 2 1 12PUTNAM 0 1 7 0 2 10RAY 0 2 0 0 0 2SALINE 1 6 22 3 1 33SULLIVAN 0 1 4 2 1 8WORTH 0 0 5 0 0 5*REGION TOTAL* 11 182 375 60 41 669

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 8 34 4 4 50AUDRAIN 0 1 16 2 0 19BOONE 1 38 99 24 7 169CALLAWAY 0 9 44 4 4 61CLARK 0 2 15 4 1 22COLE 2 24 38 13 8 85FRANKLIN 0 58 54 1 8 121GASCONADE 0 2 3 0 0 5HOWARD 0 0 3 1 3 7JEFFERSON 4 73 213 10 19 319KNOX 0 1 4 0 0 5LEWIS 0 2 9 0 0 11LINCOLN 3 15 20 3 6 47MACON 0 11 16 5 3 35MARION 0 28 37 3 1 69MONROE 0 1 7 1 1 10MONTGOMERY 0 5 12 0 3 20OSAGE 0 2 1 0 1 4PIKE 0 4 25 1 0 30RALLS 0 5 0 0 0 5RANDOLPH 0 12 31 5 4 52SCHUYLER 0 3 11 1 1 16SCOTLAND 0 3 11 1 0 15SHELBY 1 3 8 2 0 14ST. CHARLES 4 56 85 5 15 165WARREN 1 20 9 0 5 35*REGION TOTAL* 16 386 805 90 94 1,391


EXITSADOPTIVE FOSTER RELATIVE GROUP HOME/ TOTAL

HOME HOME HOME RES. CARE OTHER


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 21. (continued) Children Exiting CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Placement Category at Time of Exit

COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 0 13 12 3 5 33

IRON 0 5 0 6 0 11MADISON 0 8 3 2 2 15MARIES 0 0 5 0 1 6MISSISSIPPI 0 6 14 1 4 25NEW MADRID 0 3 17 2 1 23OREGON 1 13 5 1 3 23PEMISCOT 0 14 18 1 1 34PERRY 0 1 7 1 3 12PHELPS 0 20 56 9 5 90PULASKI 3 32 18 4 5 62REYNOLDS 0 5 8 0 0 13RIPLEY 0 14 37 2 1 54SCOTT 0 23 45 2 3 73SHANNON 0 0 5 1 0 6STODDARD 0 49 62 17 3 131ST. FRANCOIS 0 39 49 7 6 101STE. GENEVIEVE 0 2 1 0 1 4TEXAS 0 9 15 3 0 27WASHINGTON 0 9 0 4 2 15WAYNE 0 7 4 2 0 13*REGION TOTAL* 8 358 605 91 62 1,124

SOUTHWEST BARRY 1 16 49 7 4 77BARTON 0 7 11 5 1 24BATES 0 8 10 1 2 21BENTON 0 8 5 1 1 15CAMDEN 0 15 16 1 4 36CEDAR 0 7 6 2 2 17CHRISTIAN 6 29 22 7 4 68DADE 0 0 1 1 0 2DALLAS 0 11 5 2 2 20DOUGLAS 0 8 10 1 3 22GREENE 29 106 127 49 49 360HENRY 0 18 19 0 8 45HICKORY 4 3 0 0 0 7JASPER 4 86 144 27 20 281LACLEDE 3 52 32 5 3 95LAWRENCE 1 17 22 13 7 60MCDONALD 0 30 16 3 4 53MILLER 0 5 7 5 1 18MONITEAU 0 0 4 0 0 4MORGAN 0 6 5 0 1 12NEWTON 6 90 142 21 8 267OZARK 0 2 1 0 0 3POLK 2 12 8 4 3 29ST. CLAIR 0 1 1 1 0 3STONE 0 4 23 9 1 37TANEY 1 34 51 12 6 104VERNON 0 13 6 2 3 24WEBSTER 3 9 10 7 3 32WRIGHT 1 14 50 4 5 74*REGION TOTAL* 61 611 803 190 145 1,810

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 48 274 404 72 113 911*REGION TOTAL* 48 274 404 72 113 911

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 3 105 119 28 43 298ST. LOUIS COUNTY 7 146 203 30 57 443*REGION TOTAL* 10 251 322 58 100 741

STATE TOTAL 154 2,062 3,314 561 555 6,646

EXITSHOME HOME HOME RES. CARE OTHERADOPTIVE FOSTER RELATIVE GROUP HOME/ TOTAL


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System during FY 2015

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing


ATCHISON 5 0 0 1 3 9BUCHANAN 21 1 2 18 0 42CALDWELL 0 0 0 24 0 24CARROLL 2 0 1 0 0 3CASS 79 11 2 37 0 129CHARITON 2 1 0 0 0 3CLAY 23 3 1 35 1 63CLINTON 4 1 0 2 0 7COOPER 13 1 0 3 0 17DAVIESS 1 1 0 3 0 5DE KALB 5 0 0 0 1 6GENTRY 8 0 0 0 0 8GRUNDY 7 2 0 0 0 9HARRISON 13 2 0 0 0 15HOLT 0 0 0 0 0 0JOHNSON 37 4 0 22 0 63LAFAYETTE 18 2 0 0 0 20LINN 8 2 1 1 1 13LIVINGSTON 0 1 0 0 0 1MERCER 4 0 0 0 0 4NODAWAY 34 0 0 4 0 38PETTIS 32 2 2 12 0 48PLATTE 6 2 2 2 1 13PUTNAM 8 0 2 0 0 10RAY 2 0 2 0 0 4SALINE 4 5 0 17 0 26SULLIVAN 7 1 0 0 0 8WORTH 5 0 0 0 0 5* REGION TOTAL * 349 42 15 181 7 594

NORTHEAST ADAIR 26 1 2 6 0 35AUDRAIN 12 0 0 2 0 14BOONE 69 5 3 61 1 139CALLAWAY 50 2 2 6 1 61CLARK 10 0 0 2 0 12COLE 38 5 0 302 3 348FRANKLIN 50 8 3 22 0 83GASCONADE 2 0 0 5 0 7HOWARD 2 2 1 3 1 9JEFFERSON 146 13 15 70 5 249KNOX 5 0 0 0 0 5LEWIS 6 1 0 1 0 8LINCOLN 20 0 1 18 0 39MACON 22 2 0 2 1 27MARION 31 2 2 9 0 44MONROE 4 2 0 0 1 7MONTGOMERY 12 2 0 3 0 17OSAGE 2 1 0 3 0 6PIKE 23 1 0 2 0 26RALLS 3 0 0 0 0 3RANDOLPH 25 4 0 15 2 46SCHUYLER 15 0 0 1 0 16SCOTLAND 11 0 0 0 0 11SHELBY 10 0 0 0 1 11ST. CHARLES 72 15 2 41 0 130WARREN 22 5 1 4 1 33* REGION TOTAL * 688 71 32 578 17 1,386


CLOSINGSOTHER

INDEPENDENCERETURNED ACHIEVED LEGAL TOTAL

HOME GUARDIAN OTHER AGENCY


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 22. (continued) Children Closed from the Alternative Care System during FY 2015

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing


IRON 10 0 1 0 0 11MADISON 7 2 0 3 0 12MARIES 1 1 0 0 0 2MISSISSIPPI 12 0 3 0 0 15NEW MADRID 9 2 1 2 0 14OREGON 9 0 0 9 0 18PEMISCOT 16 3 7 7 0 33PERRY 7 1 0 1 0 9PHELPS 60 6 4 4 2 76PULASKI 38 4 1 29 1 73REYNOLDS 9 1 2 1 0 13RIPLEY 20 4 3 8 0 35SCOTT 40 1 9 5 0 55SHANNON 5 0 1 0 0 6STODDARD 80 4 7 31 0 122ST. FRANCOIS 28 7 0 36 0 71STE. GENEVIEVE 1 2 0 1 0 4TEXAS 10 1 1 0 0 12WASHINGTON 10 1 0 3 0 14WAYNE 8 3 0 1 0 12* REGION TOTAL * 577 61 54 206 3 901

SOUTHWEST BARRY 32 5 6 25 0 68BARTON 11 0 1 12 0 24BATES 13 3 0 6 0 22BENTON 3 1 0 4 0 8CAMDEN 29 6 0 6 0 41CEDAR 10 1 0 5 0 16CHRISTIAN 22 2 0 14 0 38DADE 3 0 0 0 0 3DALLAS 13 2 1 1 0 17DOUGLAS 12 1 1 2 0 16GREENE 180 39 3 123 1 346HENRY 22 2 0 14 1 39HICKORY 1 0 0 3 0 4JASPER 132 26 3 65 1 227LACLEDE 46 2 1 16 0 65LAWRENCE 21 5 2 20 0 48MCDONALD 34 0 0 12 2 48MILLER 14 4 0 0 0 18MONITEAU 4 0 0 0 0 4MORGAN 10 0 0 5 0 15NEWTON 205 5 12 33 1 256OZARK 2 0 0 1 0 3POLK 16 1 0 20 0 37ST. CLAIR 2 0 0 1 0 3STONE 27 2 1 4 0 34TANEY 51 10 5 11 3 80VERNON 12 3 1 0 2 18WEBSTER 17 2 6 3 1 29WRIGHT 41 3 6 9 0 59* REGION TOTAL * 985 125 49 415 12 1,586

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 417 78 8 261 13 777* REGION TOTAL * 417 78 8 261 13 777

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 113 38 4 167 6 328ST. LOUIS COUNTY 206 43 10 195 4 458* REGION TOTAL * 319 81 14 362 10 786

STATE TOTAL 3,335 458 172 2,003 62 6,030

TOTALHOME INDEPENDENCE GUARDIAN OTHER AGENCY CLOSINGS

RETURNED ACHIEVED LEGAL OTHER


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 23. Children in Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Adoptive Status

COUNTYNORTHWEST ANDREW 0 0 0 0

ATCHISON 0 0 0 0BUCHANAN 3 0 2 5CALDWELL 0 0 5 16CARROLL 0 0 0 0CASS 13 11 0 14CHARITON 0 0 0 0CLAY 12 12 1 51CLINTON 3 0 0 3COOPER 3 0 0 0DAVIESS 1 0 0 0DE KALB 0 0 0 0GENTRY 1 0 0 0GRUNDY 4 3 0 0HARRISON 0 2 0 1HOLT 0 0 0 0JOHNSON 5 4 1 11LAFAYETTE 0 1 0 0LINN 1 0 0 0LIVINGSTON 1 0 0 0MERCER 0 0 0 0NODAWAY 6 0 0 2PETTIS 2 3 0 8PLATTE 2 2 1 0PUTNAM 0 0 0 0RAY 0 0 0 0SALINE 0 0 2 20SULLIVAN 0 0 0 0WORTH 0 0 0 0*REGION TOTAL* 57 38 12 131

NORTHEAST ADAIR 3 0 3 9AUDRAIN 7 0 0 6BOONE 18 2 2 34CALLAWAY 10 6 0 1CLARK 2 1 0 0COLE 8 0 32 12FRANKLIN 6 6 0 31GASCONADE 1 0 0 2HOWARD 0 6 0 0JEFFERSON 18 15 1 44KNOX 0 0 0 0LEWIS 0 0 0 0LINCOLN 7 4 0 11MACON 3 0 0 5MARION 6 2 0 16MONROE 0 3 0 2MONTGOMERY 2 0 0 2OSAGE 1 0 0 0PIKE 4 4 0 1RALLS 0 0 0 2RANDOLPH 5 3 0 2SCHUYLER 1 0 0 0SCOTLAND 1 0 0 0SHELBY 0 0 0 2ST. CHARLES 21 9 6 31WARREN 2 2 0 6*REGION TOTAL* 126 63 44 219

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 1 0 0 0BUTLER 6 11 0 12CAPE GIRARDEAU 5 12 1 10CARTER 1 0 0 0CRAWFORD 4 4 0 0DENT 3 0 0 2DUNKLIN 6 1 0 1

FINALIZED

ADOPTIONIN CD CUSTODY TEMPORARY

ADOPTIVE

CUSTODY

IN CD CUSTODY

DURING FY 2015PRIOR TO FY 2015

TPR COMPLETED TPR COMPLETED


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 23. (continued) Children in Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Adoptive Status

COUNTYSOUTHEAST HOWELL 0 0 0 0

IRON 3 2 0 0MADISON 1 9 0 3MARIES 0 0 0 0MISSISSIPPI 0 1 0 0NEW MADRID 3 0 0 0OREGON 2 0 0 7PEMISCOT 4 0 0 0PERRY 0 2 0 1PHELPS 7 9 0 11PULASKI 5 1 0 10REYNOLDS 2 0 0 0RIPLEY 6 1 1 16SCOTT 5 1 0 8SHANNON 1 0 0 0STODDARD 4 0 0 18ST. FRANCOIS 13 14 0 34STE. GENEVIEVE 0 1 0 1TEXAS 1 3 0 7WASHINGTON 9 3 0 2WAYNE 3 0 0 0*REGION TOTAL* 95 75 2 143

SOUTHWEST BARRY 4 2 0 15BARTON 1 1 2 11BATES 1 0 0 1BENTON 5 0 0 9CAMDEN 2 3 0 0CEDAR 0 0 0 5CHRISTIAN 3 3 0 25DADE 0 0 0 0DALLAS 4 0 0 2DOUGLAS 2 0 0 9GREENE 78 94 6 94HENRY 7 2 0 13HICKORY 0 0 0 6JASPER 22 7 41 70LACLEDE 4 4 4 41LAWRENCE 6 2 0 20MCDONALD 3 2 0 11MILLER 4 1 0 0MONITEAU 0 0 0 0MORGAN 7 2 0 0NEWTON 6 3 5 32OZARK 0 0 0 1POLK 1 0 0 7ST. CLAIR 1 0 0 0STONE 3 3 0 0TANEY 6 14 0 21VERNON 4 0 0 6WEBSTER 3 3 0 3WRIGHT 1 4 0 3*REGION TOTAL* 178 150 58 405

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 85 30 10 254*REGION TOTAL* 85 30 10 254

ST LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 66 7 4 80ST. LOUIS COUNTY 46 17 11 80*REGION TOTAL* 112 24 15 160

STATE TOTAL 653 380 141 1,312

Note: TPR completed are based on children active on the last day of the fiscal year; adoptions are based on children active/adopted during the fiscal year.

ADOPTIONPRIOR TO FY 2015 DURING FY 2015 CUSTODY FINALIZED

IN CD CUSTODY IN CD CUSTODY TEMPORARYTPR COMPLETED TPR COMPLETED ADOPTIVE


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 24. Children in Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Legal Status

COUNTY 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 VNORTHWEST ANDREW 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

ATCHISON 17 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 22BUCHANAN 104 2 3 14 126 0 1 45 0 295CALDWELL 74 5 0 0 242 0 0 125 0 446CARROLL 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7CASS 352 0 1 11 257 2 1 52 0 676CHARITON 28 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 30CLAY 261 1 0 21 550 0 0 76 0 909CLINTON 65 0 0 3 4 0 0 6 0 78COOPER 37 0 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 52DAVIESS 28 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 1 34DE KALB 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35GENTRY 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 22GRUNDY 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54HARRISON 41 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 43HOLT 9 0 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 21JOHNSON 159 1 0 4 144 2 0 35 0 345LAFAYETTE 73 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 76LINN 62 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 66LIVINGSTON 43 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 50MERCER 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7NODAWAY 74 0 0 0 45 0 1 12 0 132PETTIS 124 0 0 7 135 0 0 39 0 305PLATTE 45 1 0 2 1 0 0 16 0 65PUTNAM 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28RAY 20 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 33SALINE 84 2 0 0 171 1 0 32 0 290SULLIVAN 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40WORTH 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6* REGION TOTAL * 1,896 12 4 67 1,715 5 5 463 2 4,169

NORTHEAST ADAIR 111 3 0 2 65 1 0 39 0 221AUDRAIN 104 0 0 4 10 1 0 4 0 123BOONE 448 2 6 1 364 2 2 206 2 1,033CALLAWAY 186 0 10 4 7 1 0 2 0 210CLARK 76 0 0 0 3 0 0 15 0 94COLE 263 32 2 92 2,179 1 3 97 0 2,669FRANKLIN 395 0 0 3 274 0 0 145 0 817GASCONADE 38 0 0 3 9 0 0 14 0 64HOWARD 38 0 0 0 15 0 0 14 0 67JEFFERSON 954 1 0 5 554 2 2 459 0 1,977KNOX 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11LEWIS 35 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 47LINCOLN 112 0 0 2 123 0 0 69 1 307MACON 75 0 0 1 46 1 0 41 0 164MARION 182 0 0 2 98 0 0 53 0 335MONROE 31 0 0 0 9 0 0 7 0 47MONTGOMERY 44 0 0 2 54 1 0 27 0 128OSAGE 19 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 0 26PIKE 73 0 0 0 12 0 0 8 0 93RALLS 27 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 35RANDOLPH 166 0 0 0 79 0 1 63 0 309SCHUYLER 23 0 0 0 8 1 0 3 0 35SCOTLAND 25 0 4 1 8 0 0 11 0 49SHELBY 29 0 0 0 16 0 1 2 0 48ST. CHARLES 426 6 0 11 408 2 0 180 0 1,033WARREN 99 0 0 0 75 2 0 31 1 208* REGION TOTAL * 3,990 44 22 134 4,427 15 9 1,505 4 10,150

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 47 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 54BUTLER 354 0 2 3 99 1 0 60 0 519CAPE GIRARDEAU 308 1 1 3 177 0 0 113 0 603CARTER 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 14CRAWFORD 93 0 0 2 6 0 0 8 0 109DENT 90 0 0 0 188 0 1 84 0 363DUNKLIN 204 0 0 0 56 0 0 69 0 329

CHILDRENLEGAL STATUS TOTAL


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 24. (continued) Children in Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Case Manager County

and Legal Status

COUNTY 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 VSOUTHEAST HOWELL 99 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 113

IRON 46 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 47MADISON 52 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 55MARIES 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 28MISSISSIPPI 53 0 0 1 3 0 0 21 0 78NEW MADRID 78 0 0 2 64 0 1 63 0 208OREGON 36 0 0 5 96 0 0 39 0 176PEMISCOT 125 0 0 5 7 1 0 16 0 154PERRY 37 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 40PHELPS 263 0 0 2 22 0 2 8 0 297PULASKI 182 0 0 2 275 0 1 101 0 561REYNOLDS 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39RIPLEY 127 1 0 2 89 0 2 42 0 263SCOTT 167 0 4 5 75 0 0 86 0 337SHANNON 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 14ST. FRANCOIS 266 0 0 3 374 1 3 103 0 750STE. GENEVIEVE 17 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 20STODDARD 245 0 0 2 141 0 2 184 0 574TEXAS 108 0 0 3 14 0 1 8 0 134WASHINGTON 115 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 119WAYNE 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53* REGION TOTAL * 3,250 2 7 49 1,706 3 19 1,015 0 6,051

SOUTHWEST BARRY 260 0 0 5 266 0 0 62 0 593BARTON 50 2 0 1 93 0 0 13 0 159BATES 46 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 49BENTON 42 0 0 8 32 0 0 11 0 93CAMDEN 127 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 133CEDAR 33 0 0 5 47 1 0 5 1 92CHRISTIAN 193 0 0 8 293 0 0 21 0 515DADE 20 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 21DALLAS 73 0 0 0 33 0 0 7 0 113DOUGLAS 51 0 0 0 62 0 0 7 0 120GREENE 1,160 6 0 19 1,040 2 61 189 0 2,477HENRY 125 0 2 4 139 1 0 46 0 317HICKORY 13 0 0 0 31 1 0 3 0 48JASPER 849 41 3 3 765 8 1 131 0 1,801LACLEDE 247 4 0 6 363 0 0 60 0 680LAWRENCE 244 0 0 1 198 0 0 25 2 470MCDONALD 167 0 0 0 112 0 0 20 0 299MILLER 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 81MONITEAU 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 20MORGAN 47 0 0 2 3 0 0 9 0 61NEWTON 473 5 5 13 344 1 0 60 0 901OZARK 42 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 45POLK 110 0 0 1 183 0 0 41 0 335ST. CLAIR 33 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 35STONE 123 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 128TANEY 319 0 0 6 129 3 0 70 0 527VERNON 65 0 0 2 9 0 1 3 0 80WEBSTER 88 0 0 5 37 1 0 16 0 147WRIGHT 201 0 0 0 18 0 0 89 0 308* REGION TOTAL * 5,279 58 11 89 4,208 19 63 918 3 10,648

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 2,755 10 149 35 2,469 33 57 381 0 5,889* REGION TOTAL * 2,755 10 149 35 2,469 33 57 381 0 5,889

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 909 4 0 13 1,392 18 11 502 0 2,849ST. LOUIS COUNTY 1,350 11 21 35 1,293 19 52 494 0 3,275* REGION TOTAL * 2,259 15 21 48 2,685 37 63 996 0 6,124

STATE TOTAL 19,429 141 214 422 17,210 112 216 5,278 9 43,031

Note: There were no children in Legal Status 6 during the fiscal year.

CHILDRENLEGAL STATUS TOTAL



COUNTY 01 AD 06 07 08 09NORTHWEST ANDREW 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

ATCHISON 11 6 0 0 0 0 17BUCHANAN 69 11 4 16 2 2 104CALDWELL 20 18 1 35 0 0 74CARROLL 5 1 0 0 1 0 7CASS 203 60 44 33 8 4 352CHARITON 16 5 3 0 0 4 28CLAY 154 53 19 34 1 0 261CLINTON 35 10 7 12 1 0 65COOPER 18 1 12 4 0 2 37DAVIESS 12 6 4 5 0 1 28DE KALB 19 10 1 4 0 1 35GENTRY 12 2 1 1 1 0 17GRUNDY 44 5 3 1 1 0 54HARRISON 23 6 7 5 0 0 41HOLT 8 0 1 0 0 0 9JOHNSON 95 26 20 18 0 0 159LAFAYETTE 55 4 4 9 0 1 73LINN 37 10 9 3 0 3 62LIVINGSTON 23 7 8 5 0 0 43MERCER 7 0 0 0 0 0 7NODAWAY 46 11 3 10 0 4 74PETTIS 73 15 6 16 3 11 124PLATTE 30 5 7 3 0 0 45PUTNAM 17 4 0 6 0 1 28RAY 11 3 1 4 1 0 20SALINE 38 29 8 9 0 0 84SULLIVAN 25 5 3 6 0 1 40WORTH 6 0 0 0 0 0 6* REGION TOTAL * 1,113 313 177 239 19 35 1,896

NORTHEAST ADAIR 63 25 7 16 0 0 111AUDRAIN 49 28 15 9 1 2 104BOONE 316 44 36 34 4 14 448CALLAWAY 150 11 11 9 1 4 186CLARK 51 12 7 6 0 0 76COLE 141 46 36 36 0 4 263FRANKLIN 211 66 58 52 6 2 395GASCONADE 32 2 2 2 0 0 38HOWARD 13 11 7 5 0 2 38JEFFERSON 524 153 54 206 7 10 954KNOX 7 0 1 3 0 0 11LEWIS 20 0 9 5 1 0 35LINCOLN 49 28 14 21 0 0 112MACON 42 11 14 8 0 0 75MARION 79 46 19 30 5 3 182MONROE 18 7 3 2 1 0 31MONTGOMERY 22 2 14 3 0 3 44OSAGE 18 0 1 0 0 0 19PIKE 40 13 8 7 0 5 73RALLS 7 6 4 10 0 0 27RANDOLPH 98 16 20 25 1 6 166SCHUYLER 19 0 1 3 0 0 23SCOTLAND 22 2 0 1 0 0 25SHELBY 21 2 2 1 2 1 29ST. CHARLES 229 83 56 54 0 4 426WARREN 44 13 18 16 0 8 99* REGION TOTAL * 2,285 627 417 564 29 68 3,990

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 29 3 6 9 0 0 47BUTLER 144 91 47 63 3 6 354CAPE GIRARDEAU 187 33 25 54 1 8 308CARTER 7 1 3 0 0 1 12CRAWFORD 50 16 9 17 1 0 93DENT 40 9 9 26 1 5 90DUNKLIN 144 9 12 37 2 0 204

and GoalGOAL TOTAL

CHILDREN


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 25. (continued) Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Goal

COUNTY 01 AD 06 07 08 09SOUTHEAST HOWELL 64 3 17 4 4 7 99

IRON 27 9 4 6 0 0 46MADISON 20 16 5 8 0 3 52MARIES 10 5 0 7 0 0 22MISSISSIPPI 31 2 2 18 0 0 53NEW MADRID 34 13 6 25 0 0 78OREGON 24 4 4 2 0 2 36PEMISCOT 55 13 10 35 10 2 125PERRY 21 5 7 4 0 0 37PHELPS 147 49 19 29 5 14 263PULASKI 104 25 25 13 7 8 182REYNOLDS 27 4 4 3 1 0 39RIPLEY 41 32 22 28 0 4 127SCOTT 98 12 5 48 0 4 167SHANNON 7 1 1 0 0 3 12STODDARD 155 19 21 42 0 8 245ST. FRANCOIS 164 42 29 25 1 5 266STE. GENEVIEVE 9 2 6 0 0 0 17TEXAS 54 33 9 12 0 0 108WASHINGTON 91 14 5 5 0 0 115WAYNE 24 12 8 9 0 0 53* REGION TOTAL * 1,808 477 320 529 36 80 3,250

SOUTHWEST BARRY 178 39 14 24 1 4 260BARTON 32 10 3 1 0 4 50BATES 26 9 4 3 1 3 46BENTON 18 12 4 7 1 0 42CAMDEN 98 11 16 2 0 0 127CEDAR 22 4 2 1 1 3 33CHRISTIAN 97 45 25 23 1 2 193DADE 17 0 0 3 0 0 20DALLAS 43 14 11 4 1 0 73DOUGLAS 34 6 9 2 0 0 51GREENE 493 421 174 60 5 7 1,160HENRY 45 40 20 15 0 5 125HICKORY 2 8 3 0 0 0 13JASPER 445 235 87 61 7 14 849LACLEDE 163 55 16 8 3 2 247LAWRENCE 132 55 30 26 0 1 244MCDONALD 98 39 13 10 2 5 167MILLER 50 3 10 2 1 0 66MONITEAU 8 0 2 2 0 0 12MORGAN 36 0 5 6 0 0 47NEWTON 315 86 18 28 1 25 473OZARK 16 14 6 6 0 0 42POLK 68 15 15 8 1 3 110ST. CLAIR 23 2 7 1 0 0 33STONE 74 14 12 10 1 12 123TANEY 149 95 39 36 0 0 319VERNON 43 13 8 1 0 0 65WEBSTER 47 14 9 18 0 0 88WRIGHT 126 18 18 37 0 2 201* REGION TOTAL * 2,898 1,277 580 405 27 92 5,279

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 1,402 758 283 227 28 57 2,755* REGION TOTAL * 1,402 758 283 227 28 57 2,755

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 403 182 155 126 33 10 901ST. LOUIS COUNTY 729 210 164 167 25 55 1,272* REGION TOTAL * 1,132 392 319 293 58 65 2,259

STATE TOTAL 10,638 3,844 2,096 2,257 197 397 19,429

CHILDRENGOAL TOTAL



and Length of Stay

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 2 42.5 19.0

ATCHISON 6 35.3% 10 58.8% 1 5.9% 17 13.4 5.4BUCHANAN 52 50.0% 35 33.7% 17 16.3% 104 15.5 8.6CALDWELL 5 6.8% 25 33.8% 44 59.5% 74 27.4 8.2CARROLL 6 85.7% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 7 9.3 4.3CASS 97 27.6% 97 27.6% 158 44.9% 352 25.1 11.3CHARITON 15 53.6% 2 7.1% 11 39.3% 28 17.3 9.9CLAY 76 29.1% 92 35.2% 93 35.6% 261 22.1 7.7CLINTON 22 33.8% 18 27.7% 25 38.5% 65 23.2 9.8COOPER 18 48.6% 10 27.0% 9 24.3% 37 17.6 11.0DAVIESS 4 14.3% 16 57.1% 8 28.6% 28 24.1 10.8DE KALB 17 48.6% 6 17.1% 12 34.3% 35 17.4 8.1GENTRY 6 35.3% 8 47.1% 3 17.6% 17 23.9 7.8GRUNDY 23 42.6% 19 35.2% 12 22.2% 54 19.5 8.9HARRISON 12 29.3% 11 26.8% 18 43.9% 41 23.9 10.8HOLT 0 0.0% 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 9 18.4 10.4JOHNSON 67 42.1% 35 22.0% 57 35.8% 159 22.6 10.0LAFAYETTE 28 38.4% 23 31.5% 22 30.1% 73 19.8 7.8LINN 27 43.5% 21 33.9% 14 22.6% 62 17.5 10.6LIVINGSTON 23 53.5% 10 23.3% 10 23.3% 43 23.7 9.0MERCER 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 6.7 6.9NODAWAY 45 60.8% 12 16.2% 17 23.0% 74 17.1 8.5PETTIS 64 51.6% 37 29.8% 23 18.5% 124 17.7 9.6PLATTE 19 42.2% 12 26.7% 14 31.1% 45 23.3 10.5PUTNAM 11 39.3% 8 28.6% 9 32.1% 28 20.2 9.7RAY 11 55.0% 5 25.0% 4 20.0% 20 15.2 7.1SALINE 20 23.8% 35 41.7% 29 34.5% 84 23.6 8.1SULLIVAN 20 50.0% 10 25.0% 10 25.0% 40 16.1 9.3WORTH 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 8.0 9.8* REGION TOTAL * 707 37.3% 564 29.7% 625 33.0% 1,896 21.3 9.4

NORTHEAST ADAIR 42 37.8% 33 29.7% 36 32.4% 111 18.3 9.1AUDRAIN 53 51.0% 24 23.1% 27 26.0% 104 20.1 9.5BOONE 194 43.3% 146 32.6% 108 24.1% 448 20.5 10.1CALLAWAY 97 52.2% 50 26.9% 39 21.0% 186 17.3 8.8CLARK 29 38.2% 17 22.4% 30 39.5% 76 20.4 10.4COLE 126 47.9% 66 25.1% 71 27.0% 263 22.6 9.0FRANKLIN 108 27.3% 111 28.1% 176 44.6% 395 26.3 9.0GASCONADE 18 47.4% 8 21.1% 12 31.6% 38 17.0 8.1HOWARD 13 34.2% 6 15.8% 19 50.0% 38 23.3 9.6JEFFERSON 443 46.4% 291 30.5% 220 23.1% 954 17.1 8.7KNOX 7 63.6% 3 27.3% 1 9.1% 11 15.5 8.7LEWIS 14 40.0% 7 20.0% 14 40.0% 35 27.9 12.8LINCOLN 38 33.9% 24 21.4% 50 44.6% 112 25.1 8.8MACON 29 38.7% 29 38.7% 17 22.7% 75 21.3 10.3MARION 51 28.0% 64 35.2% 67 36.8% 182 21.9 9.4MONROE 12 38.7% 12 38.7% 7 22.6% 31 17.6 8.0MONTGOMERY 20 45.5% 9 20.5% 15 34.1% 44 26.3 9.5OSAGE 12 63.2% 3 15.8% 4 21.1% 19 20.8 8.5PIKE 47 64.4% 13 17.8% 13 17.8% 73 15.4 8.8RALLS 4 14.8% 11 40.7% 12 44.4% 27 28.6 10.9RANDOLPH 70 42.2% 58 34.9% 38 22.9% 166 18.2 10.1SCHUYLER 10 43.5% 7 30.4% 6 26.1% 23 16.8 10.5SCOTLAND 10 40.0% 8 32.0% 7 28.0% 25 19.4 10.7SHELBY 24 82.8% 1 3.4% 4 13.8% 29 10.2 10.7ST. CHARLES 138 32.4% 139 32.6% 149 35.0% 426 23.6 9.5WARREN 45 45.5% 34 34.3% 20 20.2% 99 18.5 9.4* REGION TOTAL * 1,654 41.5% 1,174 29.4% 1,162 29.1% 3,990 20.5 9.3

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 27 57.4% 12 25.5% 8 17.0% 47 13.5 8.1BUTLER 161 45.5% 139 39.3% 54 15.3% 354 15.4 8.6CAPE GIRARDEAU 149 48.4% 77 25.0% 82 26.6% 308 16.9 8.3CARTER 6 50.0% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 12 32.2 12.8CRAWFORD 49 52.7% 24 25.8% 20 21.5% 93 15.4 10.0DENT 38 42.2% 26 28.9% 26 28.9% 90 22.6 10.1DUNKLIN 120 58.8% 68 33.3% 16 7.8% 204 12.0 7.9

AVERAGEAVERAGE

MONTHS MONTHS OR MORE CHILDREN OF STAY AGE0-11 12-23 2 YEARS TOTAL MONTHS



and Length of Stay

COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 61 61.6% 22 22.2% 16 16.2% 99 16.9 10.5

IRON 18 39.1% 16 34.8% 12 26.1% 46 16.8 10.3MADISON 11 21.2% 19 36.5% 22 42.3% 52 25.5 8.5MARIES 4 18.2% 9 40.9% 9 40.9% 22 23.1 9.0MISSISSIPPI 29 54.7% 19 35.8% 5 9.4% 53 11.5 7.9NEW MADRID 25 32.1% 35 44.9% 18 23.1% 78 19.0 8.2OREGON 11 30.6% 8 22.2% 17 47.2% 36 32.1 9.4PEMISCOT 55 44.0% 31 24.8% 39 31.2% 125 18.8 8.0PERRY 18 48.6% 12 32.4% 7 18.9% 37 17.1 10.7PHELPS 126 47.9% 85 32.3% 52 19.8% 263 17.1 9.0PULASKI 82 45.1% 62 34.1% 38 20.9% 182 16.7 8.2REYNOLDS 21 53.8% 12 30.8% 6 15.4% 39 19.3 9.4RIPLEY 47 37.0% 43 33.9% 37 29.1% 127 21.7 8.7SCOTT 101 60.5% 46 27.5% 20 12.0% 167 13.0 6.8SHANNON 6 50.0% 3 25.0% 3 25.0% 12 24.3 8.8STODDARD 156 63.7% 53 21.6% 36 14.7% 245 14.2 9.3ST. FRANCOIS 66 24.8% 101 38.0% 99 37.2% 266 25.0 9.1STE. GENEVIEVE 9 52.9% 2 11.8% 6 35.3% 17 24.5 10.4TEXAS 43 39.8% 43 39.8% 22 20.4% 108 16.1 8.6WASHINGTON 40 34.8% 35 30.4% 40 34.8% 115 23.7 8.5WAYNE 15 28.3% 16 30.2% 22 41.5% 53 25.7 10.2* REGION TOTAL * 1,494 46.0% 1,021 31.4% 735 22.6% 3,250 17.9 8.7

SOUTHWEST BARRY 147 56.5% 65 25.0% 48 18.5% 260 15.7 8.6BARTON 26 52.0% 9 18.0% 15 30.0% 50 16.4 10.1BATES 27 58.7% 14 30.4% 5 10.9% 46 14.5 9.2BENTON 13 31.0% 12 28.6% 17 40.5% 42 22.7 11.6CAMDEN 42 33.1% 45 35.4% 40 31.5% 127 23.0 10.0CEDAR 20 60.6% 8 24.2% 5 15.2% 33 12.4 11.0CHRISTIAN 76 39.4% 64 33.2% 53 27.5% 193 20.4 9.3DADE 12 60.0% 4 20.0% 4 20.0% 20 21.0 10.3DALLAS 44 60.3% 13 17.8% 16 21.9% 73 19.1 8.2DOUGLAS 16 31.4% 24 47.1% 11 21.6% 51 18.5 11.8GREENE 314 27.1% 429 37.0% 417 35.9% 1,160 24.7 9.3HENRY 42 33.6% 34 27.2% 49 39.2% 125 24.4 11.0HICKORY 1 7.7% 7 53.8% 5 38.5% 13 29.4 9.2JASPER 293 34.5% 290 34.2% 266 31.3% 849 20.4 9.6LACLEDE 82 33.2% 65 26.3% 100 40.5% 247 24.6 9.6LAWRENCE 101 41.4% 79 32.4% 64 26.2% 244 19.1 10.1MCDONALD 90 53.9% 47 28.1% 30 18.0% 167 15.3 10.8MILLER 25 37.9% 13 19.7% 28 42.4% 66 25.6 10.0MONITEAU 3 25.0% 6 50.0% 3 25.0% 12 20.8 11.1MORGAN 19 40.4% 17 36.2% 11 23.4% 47 17.9 10.2NEWTON 301 63.6% 115 24.3% 57 12.1% 473 12.7 9.2OZARK 19 45.2% 10 23.8% 13 31.0% 42 17.3 7.4POLK 49 44.5% 32 29.1% 29 26.4% 110 20.1 9.0ST. CLAIR 15 45.5% 12 36.4% 6 18.2% 33 16.7 12.6STONE 66 53.7% 29 23.6% 28 22.8% 123 16.5 9.6TANEY 92 28.8% 102 32.0% 125 39.2% 319 25.0 9.1VERNON 31 47.7% 15 23.1% 19 29.2% 65 23.8 8.5WEBSTER 34 38.6% 28 31.8% 26 29.5% 88 20.4 10.3WRIGHT 81 40.3% 83 41.3% 37 18.4% 201 17.5 9.2* REGION TOTAL * 2,081 39.4% 1,671 31.7% 1,527 28.9% 5,279 20.5 9.5

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 1,006 36.5% 816 29.6% 933 33.9% 2,755 22.0 9.3* REGION TOTAL * 1,006 36.5% 816 29.6% 933 33.9% 2,755 22.0 9.3

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 291 32.0% 240 26.4% 378 41.6% 909 33.9 9.8ST. LOUIS COUNTY 533 39.5% 375 27.8% 442 32.7% 1,350 23.0 9.1* REGION TOTAL * 824 36.5% 615 27.2% 820 36.3% 2,259 27.4 9.4

STATE TOTAL 7,766 40.0% 5,861 30.2% 5,802 29.9% 19,429 21.2 9.3

AVERAGEMONTHS MONTHS OR MORE CHILDREN OF STAY AGE

AVERAGE0-11 12-23 2 YEARS TOTAL MONTHS



and Number of Placements during the Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

COUNTY 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11-15 16+NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3.0

ATCHISON 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 1.2BUCHANAN 23 41 17 9 8 5 1 0 104 2.7CALDWELL 29 22 11 4 5 3 0 0 74 2.2CARROLL 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.1CASS 105 97 44 37 22 39 6 2 352 3.0CHARITON 8 3 6 4 4 3 0 0 28 3.2CLAY 94 75 36 21 13 22 0 0 261 2.5CLINTON 19 18 13 7 3 4 1 0 65 2.8COOPER 6 13 3 7 2 5 0 1 37 3.6DAVIESS 5 13 4 4 1 0 1 0 28 2.8DE KALB 9 11 7 4 2 1 1 0 35 2.7GENTRY 8 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 1.7GRUNDY 15 22 4 7 2 3 0 1 54 2.8HARRISON 8 21 4 4 1 3 0 0 41 2.6HOLT 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 9 2.1JOHNSON 62 48 24 13 9 3 0 0 159 2.2LAFAYETTE 37 8 10 4 8 5 0 1 73 2.7LINN 21 11 15 4 4 7 0 0 62 2.8LIVINGSTON 18 12 0 6 2 4 1 0 43 2.8MERCER 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 1.4NODAWAY 40 17 3 3 3 8 0 0 74 2.3PETTIS 37 30 20 13 11 8 2 3 124 3.3PLATTE 16 17 3 3 1 5 0 0 45 2.4PUTNAM 5 14 0 8 1 0 0 0 28 2.5RAY 4 8 4 3 0 1 0 0 20 2.6SALINE 36 15 16 6 3 6 2 0 84 2.6SULLIVAN 9 20 5 5 1 0 0 0 40 2.2WORTH 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1.0* REGION TOTAL * 651 548 253 180 106 135 15 8 1,896 2.7

NORTHEAST ADAIR 45 31 15 9 4 6 1 0 111 2.4AUDRAIN 35 31 10 8 4 14 2 0 104 3.1BOONE 139 140 36 37 35 49 9 3 448 3.1CALLAWAY 57 56 33 12 8 15 3 2 186 2.9CLARK 24 14 16 7 7 7 1 0 76 3.0COLE 91 74 42 11 18 17 9 1 263 2.9FRANKLIN 149 118 41 20 25 33 7 2 395 2.8GASCONADE 16 7 5 8 2 0 0 0 38 2.3HOWARD 10 6 2 4 6 9 1 0 38 4.1JEFFERSON 356 293 134 74 36 46 12 3 954 2.5KNOX 9 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 1.7LEWIS 10 9 5 2 4 3 2 0 35 3.4LINCOLN 32 40 14 4 8 11 3 0 112 3.0MACON 25 17 17 6 3 5 1 1 75 2.9MARION 46 65 25 12 14 16 4 0 182 2.9MONROE 13 9 1 3 2 3 0 0 31 2.6MONTGOMERY 17 13 3 2 4 4 0 1 44 2.9OSAGE 13 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 19 1.7PIKE 32 13 12 4 4 5 2 1 73 3.0RALLS 8 5 5 2 4 3 0 0 27 2.9RANDOLPH 51 46 20 19 12 11 6 1 166 3.1SCHUYLER 8 5 5 2 2 1 0 0 23 2.5SCOTLAND 7 9 6 2 0 0 1 0 25 2.6SHELBY 15 8 2 2 1 1 0 0 29 2.0ST. CHARLES 119 131 77 30 24 35 6 4 426 3.0WARREN 41 24 11 9 5 5 3 1 99 2.8* REGION TOTAL * 1,368 1,168 539 289 232 301 73 20 3,990 2.8

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 24 16 3 0 0 2 2 0 47 2.3BUTLER 135 95 57 29 19 16 3 0 354 2.4CAPE GIRARDEAU 106 93 47 31 13 16 1 1 308 2.5CARTER 4 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 12 3.8CRAWFORD 34 21 19 7 6 6 0 0 93 2.5DENT 28 26 10 11 7 4 2 2 90 3.1DUNKLIN 72 70 35 15 4 5 3 0 204 2.3

AVERAGENUMBER OF PLACEMENTS TOTAL

CHILDRENNUMBER OFPLACEMENTS



and Number of Placements during the Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

COUNTY 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11-15 16+SOUTHEAST HOWELL 43 20 14 6 5 8 2 1 99 2.9

IRON 20 10 4 2 1 8 1 0 46 3.1MADISON 10 15 13 5 3 3 2 1 52 3.4MARIES 8 10 3 0 0 1 0 0 22 2.1MISSISSIPPI 27 14 7 1 2 2 0 0 53 1.9NEW MADRID 24 18 17 11 1 5 2 0 78 2.9OREGON 11 6 2 8 2 5 1 1 36 3.9PEMISCOT 41 29 21 9 9 11 4 1 125 3.1PERRY 9 12 7 3 2 3 1 0 37 3.1PHELPS 93 84 38 18 10 17 2 1 263 2.5PULASKI 49 53 39 15 8 18 0 0 182 2.8REYNOLDS 20 3 4 5 4 2 1 0 39 2.7RIPLEY 49 33 21 4 8 11 1 0 127 2.6SCOTT 82 45 13 17 5 5 0 0 167 2.1SHANNON 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 3.1STODDARD 74 87 34 19 14 15 2 0 245 2.6ST. FRANCOIS 92 71 34 28 20 16 4 1 266 2.8STE. GENEVIEVE 2 6 3 2 1 1 2 0 17 4.2TEXAS 53 21 18 7 4 4 1 0 108 2.2WASHINGTON 29 34 27 9 6 8 1 1 115 2.8WAYNE 22 8 8 6 6 2 1 0 53 2.7* REGION TOTAL * 1,169 904 499 271 161 195 40 11 3,250 2.6

SOUTHWEST BARRY 85 71 50 27 13 10 4 0 260 2.6BARTON 20 9 9 4 2 6 0 0 50 2.6BATES 17 15 7 4 0 2 1 0 46 2.4BENTON 7 12 6 10 2 4 1 0 42 3.2CAMDEN 23 41 31 8 7 14 1 2 127 3.2CEDAR 9 5 8 7 1 3 0 0 33 2.9CHRISTIAN 54 77 27 14 4 14 3 0 193 2.6DADE 8 3 7 1 0 1 0 0 20 2.3DALLAS 24 22 15 5 0 7 0 0 73 2.5DOUGLAS 5 15 11 11 4 5 0 0 51 3.3GREENE 298 323 202 114 73 114 28 8 1,160 3.2HENRY 34 35 13 15 8 15 2 3 125 3.6HICKORY 2 1 5 1 2 2 0 0 13 3.7JASPER 218 238 154 82 46 96 12 3 849 3.1LACLEDE 61 83 53 25 4 11 6 4 247 3.0LAWRENCE 65 49 48 31 14 30 6 1 244 3.4MCDONALD 59 49 18 17 6 17 1 0 167 2.7MILLER 16 18 8 6 5 8 4 1 66 3.8MONITEAU 4 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 12 2.5MORGAN 12 21 5 5 0 2 2 0 47 2.7NEWTON 139 140 99 40 25 25 4 1 473 2.6OZARK 26 11 2 1 2 0 0 0 42 1.6POLK 32 40 16 5 5 9 3 0 110 2.9ST. CLAIR 9 10 6 3 2 2 1 0 33 2.8STONE 30 30 28 13 5 17 0 0 123 3.1TANEY 130 67 48 22 16 25 8 3 319 2.8VERNON 21 27 6 2 1 4 4 0 65 2.9WEBSTER 31 28 13 10 2 3 1 0 88 2.4WRIGHT 87 43 26 17 9 18 1 0 201 2.5* REGION TOTAL * 1,526 1,486 923 502 258 465 93 26 5,279 3.0

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 832 707 424 267 162 316 45 2 2,755 3.0* REGION TOTAL * 832 707 424 267 162 316 45 2 2,755 3.0

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 179 243 142 105 67 116 38 19 909 3.9ST. LOUIS COUNTY 338 392 266 135 56 119 27 17 1,350 3.2* REGION TOTAL * 517 635 408 240 123 235 65 36 2,259 3.5

STATE TOTAL 6,063 5,448 3,046 1,749 1,042 1,647 331 103 19,429 2.9

CHILDREN PLACEMENTS

AVERAGENUMBER OF PLACEMENTS TOTAL NUMBER OF


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 28. Adoptions Finalized by Case Manager County FY 2011 - 2015


ATCHISON 0 0 0 3 0 3BUCHANAN 9 2 2 11 5 29CALDWELL 16 15 22 14 16 83CARROLL 0 0 1 0 0 1CASS 26 19 23 9 14 91CHARITON 0 0 0 0 0 0CLAY 35 45 57 40 51 228CLINTON 0 0 1 0 3 4COOPER 1 3 1 1 0 6DAVIESS 0 1 2 0 0 3DE KALB 0 0 0 0 0 0GENTRY 0 0 0 0 0 0GRUNDY 3 1 0 0 0 4HARRISON 0 0 0 0 1 1HOLT 0 0 5 0 0 5JOHNSON 8 11 17 11 11 58LAFAYETTE 1 0 1 0 0 2LINN 0 0 0 0 0 0LIVINGSTON 0 1 1 0 0 2MERCER 0 0 0 0 0 0NODAWAY 5 0 4 2 2 13PETTIS 13 13 14 6 8 54PLATTE 0 0 0 0 0 0PUTNAM 0 0 0 0 0 0RAY 1 1 1 1 0 4SALINE 14 10 8 18 20 70SULLIVAN 0 0 0 0 0 0WORTH 0 0 0 0 0 0*REGION TOTAL* 132 122 160 116 131 661

NORTHEAST ADAIR 10 1 5 3 9 28AUDRAIN 4 1 4 1 6 16BOONE 40 20 18 38 34 150CALLAWAY 0 0 0 0 1 1CLARK 0 0 0 0 0 0COLE 9 12 23 14 12 70FRANKLIN 18 15 25 25 31 114GASCONADE 0 0 0 2 2 4HOWARD 1 1 1 0 0 3JEFFERSON 53 44 43 43 44 227KNOX 0 0 0 0 0 0LEWIS 0 0 0 4 0 4LINCOLN 7 4 8 14 11 44MACON 1 5 2 3 5 16MARION 4 9 4 6 16 39MONROE 3 1 0 1 2 7MONTGOMERY 0 3 0 3 2 8OSAGE 0 0 0 0 0 0PIKE 0 4 1 0 1 6RALLS 0 0 0 2 2 4RANDOLPH 6 6 6 10 2 30SCHUYLER 1 0 0 1 0 2SCOTLAND 0 0 0 0 0 0SHELBY 1 0 1 0 2 4ST. CHARLES 31 29 25 16 31 132WARREN 1 3 3 3 6 16*REGION TOTAL* 190 158 169 189 219 925


TOTALFY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 28. (continued) Adoptions Finalized by Case Manager County FY 2011 - 2015


IRON 0 0 1 0 0 1MADISON 0 0 0 0 3 3MARIES 1 1 0 0 0 2MISSISSIPPI 0 0 2 0 0 2NEW MADRID 2 7 6 10 0 25OREGON 12 7 8 11 7 45PEMISCOT 0 2 0 1 0 3PERRY 0 0 0 0 1 1PHELPS 1 0 0 2 11 14PULASKI 35 23 19 20 10 107REYNOLDS 1 0 0 0 0 1RIPLEY 11 3 16 8 16 54SCOTT 32 33 47 37 8 157SHANNON 0 0 0 0 0 0STODDARD 3 2 4 4 18 31ST. FRANCOIS 0 0 0 0 34 34STE. GENEVIEVE 12 11 14 15 1 53TEXAS 0 1 2 3 7 13WASHINGTON 0 1 0 5 2 8WAYNE 0 0 0 0 0 0*REGION TOTAL* 146 117 149 152 143 707

SOUTHWEST BARRY 32 10 29 25 15 111BARTON 1 4 8 7 11 31BATES 0 0 0 0 1 1BENTON 4 1 1 2 9 17CAMDEN 4 3 5 4 0 16CEDAR 1 8 6 1 5 21CHRISTIAN 21 51 18 31 25 146DADE 5 4 0 1 0 10DALLAS 0 1 5 2 2 10DOUGLAS 5 4 1 4 9 23GREENE 88 113 119 136 94 550HENRY 5 16 12 16 13 62HICKORY 0 0 0 2 6 8JASPER 44 54 72 92 70 332LACLEDE 17 19 20 14 41 111LAWRENCE 12 12 6 14 20 64MCDONALD 8 11 8 13 11 51MILLER 8 6 5 2 0 21MONITEAU 4 7 1 2 0 14MORGAN 2 5 5 2 0 14NEWTON 40 34 23 22 32 151OZARK 0 0 0 0 1 1POLK 20 36 26 14 7 103ST. CLAIR 0 1 0 0 0 1STONE 0 1 0 0 0 1TANEY 8 12 6 14 21 61VERNON 0 0 1 0 6 7WEBSTER 2 7 2 14 3 28WRIGHT 0 1 6 4 3 14*REGION TOTAL* 331 421 385 438 405 1,980

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 212 194 224 219 254 1,103*REGION TOTAL* 212 194 224 219 254 1,103

ST LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 71 57 64 68 80 340ST. LOUIS COUNTY 84 80 72 68 80 384*REGION TOTAL* 155 137 136 136 160 724

STATE TOTAL 1,166 1,149 1,223 1,250 1,312 6,100

Note: County for all years is based on the most recent assigned case manager county for the child as of June 30, 2015.

TOTALFY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 29. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Age

COUNTY 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-14 15+NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

ATCHISON 5 3 5 3 0 1 17BUCHANAN 15 20 23 12 11 23 104CALDWELL 4 17 21 16 8 8 74CARROLL 4 1 1 0 1 0 7CASS 28 51 52 37 49 135 352CHARITON 2 5 4 4 7 6 28CLAY 65 52 41 29 24 50 261CLINTON 5 12 14 7 9 18 65COOPER 9 2 4 1 3 18 37DAVIESS 2 4 4 5 5 8 28DE KALB 8 9 3 2 5 8 35GENTRY 3 4 4 2 2 2 17GRUNDY 7 12 8 10 7 10 54HARRISON 4 8 5 4 6 14 41HOLT 0 1 3 1 2 2 9JOHNSON 19 27 26 18 22 47 159LAFAYETTE 12 19 16 8 6 12 73LINN 5 6 9 12 15 15 62LIVINGSTON 7 8 8 4 6 10 43MERCER 0 4 1 0 1 1 7NODAWAY 11 12 17 11 10 13 74PETTIS 15 20 20 22 16 31 124PLATTE 7 8 4 2 8 16 45PUTNAM 2 3 6 5 7 5 28RAY 3 7 3 3 2 2 20SALINE 15 18 14 16 6 15 84SULLIVAN 4 6 7 10 7 6 40WORTH 1 0 2 1 0 2 6* REGION TOTAL * 262 339 325 245 245 480 1,896

NORTHEAST ADAIR 15 22 21 11 18 24 111AUDRAIN 16 16 16 14 13 29 104BOONE 56 68 62 56 77 129 448CALLAWAY 30 31 37 26 26 36 186CLARK 5 16 10 12 8 25 76COLE 42 53 41 38 26 63 263FRANKLIN 49 84 78 53 34 97 395GASCONADE 6 7 7 10 4 4 38HOWARD 6 6 5 5 4 12 38JEFFERSON 135 187 166 151 145 170 954KNOX 1 2 3 2 1 2 11LEWIS 4 4 2 2 1 22 35LINCOLN 25 17 13 17 11 29 112MACON 13 13 6 9 11 23 75MARION 23 29 30 36 24 40 182MONROE 4 11 6 2 1 7 31MONTGOMERY 8 11 5 2 3 15 44OSAGE 4 3 3 4 2 3 19PIKE 13 11 14 9 6 20 73RALLS 2 2 6 3 5 9 27RANDOLPH 22 18 30 23 23 50 166SCHUYLER 1 3 6 3 3 7 23SCOTLAND 2 4 3 3 5 8 25SHELBY 3 4 3 3 7 9 29ST. CHARLES 49 80 75 70 49 103 426WARREN 13 17 21 13 11 24 99* REGION TOTAL * 547 719 669 577 518 960 3,990


AGE IN YEARSTOTAL


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 29. (continued) Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Age

COUNTY 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-14 15+SOUTHEAST HOWELL 13 13 13 12 14 34 99

IRON 6 7 3 8 10 12 46MADISON 5 15 9 8 5 10 52MARIES 1 5 6 4 1 5 22MISSISSIPPI 10 9 12 9 9 4 53NEW MADRID 15 18 12 12 7 14 78OREGON 7 3 3 9 7 7 36PEMISCOT 24 28 20 15 19 19 125PERRY 5 7 4 2 4 15 37PHELPS 46 46 40 36 31 64 263PULASKI 36 38 36 21 16 35 182REYNOLDS 8 6 6 2 6 11 39RIPLEY 26 23 21 11 15 31 127SCOTT 30 51 38 19 10 19 167SHANNON 1 1 6 1 1 2 12STODDARD 34 41 37 40 42 51 245ST. FRANCOIS 36 56 48 38 26 62 266STE. GENEVIEVE 5 2 1 0 0 9 17TEXAS 15 26 19 12 11 25 108WASHINGTON 21 20 22 16 14 22 115WAYNE 6 7 8 9 7 16 53* REGION TOTAL * 539 638 541 432 399 701 3,250

SOUTHWEST BARRY 46 46 44 38 33 53 260BARTON 5 8 6 9 9 13 50BATES 8 9 8 4 5 12 46BENTON 2 6 5 4 9 16 42CAMDEN 17 21 18 18 19 34 127CEDAR 5 4 1 5 4 14 33CHRISTIAN 26 42 32 21 24 48 193DADE 1 2 5 5 3 4 20DALLAS 15 19 8 9 8 14 73DOUGLAS 1 8 4 11 6 21 51GREENE 201 205 165 148 127 314 1,160HENRY 11 19 16 14 17 48 125HICKORY 4 2 1 1 1 4 13JASPER 124 145 133 109 99 239 849LACLEDE 23 53 39 38 37 57 247LAWRENCE 30 39 31 33 39 72 244MCDONALD 18 17 25 28 27 52 167MILLER 12 11 7 2 14 20 66MONITEAU 0 2 2 2 2 4 12MORGAN 6 5 7 10 5 14 47NEWTON 56 75 99 73 70 100 473OZARK 12 8 7 6 2 7 42POLK 18 21 20 16 8 27 110ST. CLAIR 2 2 4 4 6 15 33STONE 16 24 17 17 18 31 123TANEY 51 67 46 39 36 80 319VERNON 12 19 6 6 7 15 65WEBSTER 13 14 11 8 14 28 88WRIGHT 17 45 42 29 23 45 201* REGION TOTAL * 752 938 809 707 672 1,401 5,279

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 444 480 458 358 321 694 2,755* REGION TOTAL * 444 480 458 358 321 694 2,755

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 145 156 131 104 101 272 909ST. LOUIS COUNTY 267 243 180 152 152 356 1,350* REGION TOTAL * 412 399 311 256 253 628 2,259

STATE TOTAL 2,956 3,513 3,113 2,575 2,408 4,864 19,429

TOTALAGE IN YEARS


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 30. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Race

MULTI-RACE/COUNTY

NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 0 0 0 2 0 2ATCHISON 0 0 0 0 17 0 17BUCHANAN 0 1 7 0 88 8 104CALDWELL 0 0 1 0 69 4 74CARROLL 0 0 0 0 6 1 7CASS 0 0 22 1 313 16 352CHARITON 1 0 1 0 26 0 28CLAY 0 0 48 2 191 20 261CLINTON 0 0 0 0 65 0 65COOPER 0 0 10 0 27 0 37DAVIESS 0 0 0 0 28 0 28DE KALB 0 0 4 0 29 2 35GENTRY 0 0 0 0 17 0 17GRUNDY 0 0 2 0 51 1 54HARRISON 0 0 0 0 40 1 41HOLT 0 0 0 0 8 1 9JOHNSON 2 1 12 0 132 12 159LAFAYETTE 0 0 3 0 64 6 73LINN 0 0 0 0 59 3 62LIVINGSTON 0 0 4 0 36 3 43MERCER 0 0 0 0 7 0 7NODAWAY 0 0 0 0 70 4 74PETTIS 0 0 9 0 104 11 124PLATTE 0 0 8 2 30 5 45PUTNAM 0 0 3 0 22 3 28RAY 0 0 0 0 18 2 20SALINE 0 0 16 0 62 6 84SULLIVAN 0 0 1 0 36 3 40WORTH 0 0 0 0 6 0 6* REGION TOTAL * 3 2 151 5 1,623 112 1,896

NORTHEAST ADAIR 0 0 1 0 101 9 111AUDRAIN 0 1 14 0 86 3 104BOONE 1 0 149 0 267 31 448CALLAWAY 0 0 17 0 152 17 186CLARK 1 0 5 0 68 2 76COLE 0 0 61 0 182 20 263FRANKLIN 0 0 5 0 369 21 395GASCONADE 0 0 0 0 36 2 38HOWARD 0 0 4 0 32 2 38JEFFERSON 2 0 23 0 852 77 954KNOX 0 0 0 0 10 1 11LEWIS 1 0 0 0 34 0 35LINCOLN 0 0 7 0 93 12 112MACON 0 0 8 0 64 3 75MARION 0 2 35 0 123 22 182MONROE 0 0 0 0 30 1 31MONTGOMERY 0 0 1 0 37 6 44OSAGE 0 0 0 0 18 1 19PIKE 0 0 3 0 61 9 73RALLS 0 0 0 0 24 3 27RANDOLPH 0 0 15 0 132 19 166SCHUYLER 0 0 2 0 21 0 23SCOTLAND 0 0 0 0 25 0 25SHELBY 0 0 0 0 26 3 29ST. CHARLES 1 0 67 0 313 45 426WARREN 1 0 10 0 82 6 99* REGION TOTAL * 7 3 427 0 3,238 315 3,990


BLACK ISLANDER UNKNOWN ALASKA NATIVE

NATIVE HAWAIIAN/AMERICANINDIAN/ PACIFIC

TOTALWHITEASIAN


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 30. (continued) Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Race

MULTI-RACE/COUNTY

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 0 0 1 0 97 1 99IRON 0 0 0 0 44 2 46MADISON 0 0 2 0 47 3 52MARIES 0 0 0 0 21 1 22MISSISSIPPI 0 0 15 0 37 1 53NEW MADRID 0 0 22 0 56 0 78OREGON 0 0 2 0 32 2 36PEMISCOT 0 0 36 0 82 7 125PERRY 0 0 2 0 35 0 37PHELPS 0 0 13 1 239 10 263PULASKI 0 1 26 1 135 19 182REYNOLDS 0 0 0 0 36 3 39RIPLEY 1 0 2 0 115 9 127SCOTT 0 0 57 0 104 6 167SHANNON 0 0 0 0 11 1 12STODDARD 0 0 9 0 229 7 245ST. FRANCOIS 1 0 13 0 246 6 266STE. GENEVIEVE 0 0 0 0 16 1 17TEXAS 1 0 0 0 106 1 108WASHINGTON 0 0 3 0 112 0 115WAYNE 0 0 0 0 52 1 53* REGION TOTAL * 7 1 320 2 2,804 116 3,250

SOUTHWEST BARRY 3 1 1 0 246 9 260BARTON 0 0 0 0 47 3 50BATES 0 0 0 0 43 3 46BENTON 0 0 0 0 41 1 42CAMDEN 1 0 1 1 118 6 127CEDAR 0 0 0 0 32 1 33CHRISTIAN 1 0 0 0 183 9 193DADE 0 0 0 0 19 1 20DALLAS 0 0 1 0 72 0 73DOUGLAS 0 0 0 0 48 3 51GREENE 0 2 103 0 1,000 55 1,160HENRY 1 1 2 0 116 5 125HICKORY 0 0 0 0 13 0 13JASPER 4 0 34 0 705 106 849LACLEDE 0 0 0 0 233 14 247LAWRENCE 2 0 3 0 224 15 244MCDONALD 2 1 1 0 159 4 167MILLER 0 0 3 0 60 3 66MONITEAU 0 0 0 0 12 0 12MORGAN 0 0 0 0 46 1 47NEWTON 6 5 13 6 413 30 473OZARK 2 0 1 0 35 4 42POLK 1 1 2 0 103 3 110ST. CLAIR 0 0 0 0 32 1 33STONE 0 0 1 0 117 5 123TANEY 0 1 5 1 290 22 319VERNON 0 0 2 0 59 4 65WEBSTER 0 0 0 0 88 0 88WRIGHT 0 0 4 0 187 10 201* REGION TOTAL * 23 12 177 8 4,741 318 5,279

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 6 7 1,203 6 1,320 213 2,755* REGION TOTAL * 6 7 1,203 6 1,320 213 2,755

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 0 2 739 0 120 48 909ST. LOUIS COUNTY 1 3 839 1 441 65 1,350* REGION TOTAL * 1 5 1,578 1 561 113 2,259

STATE TOTAL 47 30 3,856 22 14,287 1,187 19,429

ALASKA NATIVE ASIAN BLACK ISLANDER WHITE UNKNOWN TOTALINDIAN/ PACIFIC

AMERICAN NATIVE HAWAIIAN/


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 31. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Hispanic Origin

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 2 0 2

ATCHISON 1 16 0 17BUCHANAN 8 93 3 104CALDWELL 4 69 1 74CARROLL 0 6 1 7CASS 14 319 19 352CHARITON 0 28 0 28CLAY 15 237 9 261CLINTON 0 63 2 65COOPER 0 36 1 37DAVIESS 0 28 0 28DE KALB 1 34 0 35GENTRY 0 17 0 17GRUNDY 2 52 0 54HARRISON 3 38 0 41HOLT 0 9 0 9JOHNSON 5 140 14 159LAFAYETTE 3 64 6 73LINN 5 57 0 62LIVINGSTON 1 38 4 43MERCER 1 5 1 7NODAWAY 1 71 2 74PETTIS 7 116 1 124PLATTE 2 40 3 45PUTNAM 0 25 3 28RAY 2 18 0 20SALINE 1 76 7 84SULLIVAN 4 35 1 40WORTH 0 6 0 6* REGION TOTAL * 80 1,738 78 1,896

NORTHEAST ADAIR 2 106 3 111AUDRAIN 0 101 3 104BOONE 20 423 5 448CALLAWAY 3 175 8 186CLARK 3 72 1 76COLE 6 253 4 263FRANKLIN 2 379 14 395GASCONADE 0 35 3 38HOWARD 1 34 3 38JEFFERSON 11 915 28 954KNOX 0 11 0 11LEWIS 0 34 1 35LINCOLN 4 101 7 112MACON 4 71 0 75MARION 1 177 4 182MONROE 0 31 0 31MONTGOMERY 0 43 1 44OSAGE 0 19 0 19PIKE 5 65 3 73RALLS 0 26 1 27RANDOLPH 4 159 3 166SCHUYLER 2 21 0 23SCOTLAND 2 23 0 25SHELBY 2 26 1 29ST. CHARLES 15 398 13 426WARREN 2 93 4 99* REGION TOTAL * 89 3,791 110 3,990

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 0 46 1 47BUTLER 7 337 10 354CAPE GIRARDEAU 7 297 4 308CARTER 0 11 1 12CRAWFORD 3 88 2 93DENT 0 88 2 90DUNKLIN 9 188 7 204

HISPANIC NOT HISPANIC UNKNOWN TOTAL


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 31. (continued) Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Hispanic Origin

COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 2 96 1 99

IRON 1 44 1 46MADISON 0 51 1 52MARIES 0 22 0 22MISSISSIPPI 0 53 0 53NEW MADRID 1 77 0 78OREGON 3 33 0 36PEMISCOT 1 122 2 125PERRY 3 34 0 37PHELPS 7 250 6 263PULASKI 11 156 15 182REYNOLDS 0 38 1 39RIPLEY 4 119 4 127SCOTT 5 158 4 167SHANNON 1 11 0 12STODDARD 2 239 4 245ST. FRANCOIS 6 251 9 266STE. GENEVIEVE 0 14 3 17TEXAS 2 102 4 108WASHINGTON 1 108 6 115WAYNE 1 50 2 53* REGION TOTAL * 77 3,083 90 3,250

SOUTHWEST BARRY 17 234 9 260BARTON 0 42 8 50BATES 2 36 8 46BENTON 1 40 1 42CAMDEN 5 122 0 127CEDAR 0 29 4 33CHRISTIAN 6 185 2 193DADE 0 20 0 20DALLAS 1 70 2 73DOUGLAS 0 51 0 51GREENE 52 1,082 26 1,160HENRY 3 119 3 125HICKORY 2 11 0 13JASPER 86 741 22 849LACLEDE 8 235 4 247LAWRENCE 4 234 6 244MCDONALD 12 152 3 167MILLER 0 65 1 66MONITEAU 1 10 1 12MORGAN 1 45 1 47NEWTON 23 433 17 473OZARK 0 39 3 42POLK 1 106 3 110ST. CLAIR 2 28 3 33STONE 8 112 3 123TANEY 5 305 9 319VERNON 0 54 11 65WEBSTER 2 86 0 88WRIGHT 12 186 3 201* REGION TOTAL * 254 4,872 153 5,279

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 158 2,439 158 2,755* REGION TOTAL * 158 2,439 158 2,755

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 22 830 57 909ST. LOUIS COUNTY 32 1,262 56 1,350* REGION TOTAL * 54 2,092 113 2,259

STATE TOTAL 712 18,015 702 19,429

HISPANIC NOT HISPANIC UNKNOWN TOTAL


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 32. Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Gender

COUNTY NORTHWEST ANDREW 0 2 2

ATCHISON 11 6 17BUCHANAN 51 53 104CALDWELL 37 37 74CARROLL 5 2 7CASS 153 199 352CHARITON 13 15 28CLAY 117 144 261CLINTON 29 36 65COOPER 19 18 37DAVIESS 13 15 28DE KALB 13 22 35GENTRY 9 8 17GRUNDY 28 26 54HARRISON 23 18 41HOLT 4 5 9JOHNSON 66 93 159LAFAYETTE 36 37 73LINN 21 41 62LIVINGSTON 23 20 43MERCER 2 5 7NODAWAY 37 37 74PETTIS 60 64 124PLATTE 19 26 45PUTNAM 16 12 28RAY 12 8 20SALINE 38 46 84SULLIVAN 18 22 40WORTH 1 5 6* REGION TOTAL * 874 1,022 1,896

NORTHEAST ADAIR 52 59 111AUDRAIN 57 47 104BOONE 212 236 448CALLAWAY 85 101 186CLARK 29 47 76COLE 126 137 263FRANKLIN 197 198 395GASCONADE 20 18 38HOWARD 13 25 38JEFFERSON 459 495 954KNOX 3 8 11LEWIS 20 15 35LINCOLN 49 63 112MACON 42 33 75MARION 96 86 182MONROE 14 17 31MONTGOMERY 22 22 44OSAGE 13 6 19PIKE 41 32 73RALLS 14 13 27RANDOLPH 74 92 166SCHUYLER 8 15 23SCOTLAND 16 9 25SHELBY 17 12 29ST. CHARLES 201 225 426WARREN 40 59 99* REGION TOTAL * 1,920 2,070 3,990

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 28 19 47BUTLER 178 176 354CAPE GIRARDEAU 144 164 308CARTER 8 4 12CRAWFORD 43 50 93DENT 44 46 90DUNKLIN 94 110 204

FEMALE MALE TOTAL


Out-of-Home PlacementTable 32. (continued) Children in CD Custody during FY 2015 by Case Manager County and Gender

COUNTY SOUTHEAST HOWELL 61 38 99

IRON 27 19 46MADISON 28 24 52MARIES 12 10 22MISSISSIPPI 26 27 53NEW MADRID 31 47 78OREGON 17 19 36PEMISCOT 63 62 125PERRY 19 18 37PHELPS 133 130 263PULASKI 96 86 182REYNOLDS 15 24 39RIPLEY 58 69 127SCOTT 71 96 167SHANNON 5 7 12STODDARD 118 127 245ST. FRANCOIS 141 125 266STE. GENEVIEVE 8 9 17TEXAS 64 44 108WASHINGTON 58 57 115WAYNE 24 29 53* REGION TOTAL * 1,614 1,636 3,250

SOUTHWEST BARRY 136 124 260BARTON 24 26 50BATES 27 19 46BENTON 22 20 42CAMDEN 67 60 127CEDAR 19 14 33CHRISTIAN 110 83 193DADE 6 14 20DALLAS 33 40 73DOUGLAS 24 27 51GREENE 549 611 1,160HENRY 58 67 125HICKORY 10 3 13JASPER 428 421 849LACLEDE 128 119 247LAWRENCE 122 122 244MCDONALD 88 79 167MILLER 31 35 66MONITEAU 7 5 12MORGAN 20 27 47NEWTON 225 248 473OZARK 18 24 42POLK 54 56 110ST. CLAIR 17 16 33STONE 65 58 123TANEY 164 155 319VERNON 31 34 65WEBSTER 48 40 88WRIGHT 99 102 201* REGION TOTAL * 2,630 2,649 5,279

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 1,320 1,435 2,755* REGION TOTAL * 1,320 1,435 2,755

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 432 477 909ST. LOUIS COUNTY 686 664 1,350* REGION TOTAL * 1,118 1,141 2,259

STATE TOTAL 9,476 9,953 19,429

FEMALE MALE TOTAL



JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL

FY 2014 562 639 588 627 550 466 551 515 561 775 584 608 7,026

FY 2015 621 654 679 681 492 538 590 527 579 623 572 572 7,128

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTALFY 2014 469 515 501 521 510 518 437 437 544 453 487 546 5,938FY 2015 526 585 569 604 504 573 468 525 618 526 541 607 6,646

Table 33. CD Custody (Re)Entries by Month FY 2014 - 2015

Figure 10. CD Custody (Re)Entries by Month FY 2014 - 2015

Table 34. CD Custody Exits by Month FY 2014 - 2015

Figure 11. CD Custody Exits by Month FY 2014 - 2015

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

FY 2014 FY 2015

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN

FY 2014 FY 2015



Figure 12. Children (Re)Entering CD Custody during FY 2015 by Placement Type

Figure 13. Children Closing from Alternative Care during FY 2015 by Close Reason

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


Foster Home Relative Home Group/Res. Care Other and Adoptive Home

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%


Returned Home Achieved Independence Legal Guardian Other/Other Agency



Fiscal Year

Children

Active* Exits*FY 2011 16,493 6,209 5,515FY 2012 17,160 4.0% 6,266 0.9% 5,792 5.0%FY 2013 18,289 6.6% 6,421 2.5% 5,910 2.0%FY 2014 18,290 0.0% 7,035 9.6% 5,930 0.3%FY 2015 19,429 6.2% 7,128 1.3% 6,646 12.1%


0

FY 2011 - 2015

Figure 14. Children in CD Custody

Table 35. Children in CD Custody

Percent Change

from Prior Year (Re)Entries*

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Percent Change

from Prior Year

FY 2011 - 2015

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Ch

ildre

n

Active (Re)Entries Exits



Fiscal Year

Adoptions

Finalized*FY 2011 1,166FY 2012 1,149 -1.5%FY 2013 1,223 6.4%FY 2014 1,250 2.2%FY 2015 1,312 5.0%


0

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Figure 15. Adoptions Finalized

Table 36. Adoptions Finalized

FY 2011 - 2015

FY 2011 - 2015

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Ad

op

tio

ns



Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures


Counties listed are case manager counties.

Tables include only children in Legal Status 1 unless otherwise stated.

Table 16, Table 18, Table 19, Table 21 & Figure 12.Placement categories include the following placement types:Adoptive home: ADF, ADO, ADR, FAHFoster homes: CFP, FGB, FGH, FGM, FHB, FHE, FHM, FHOGroup home/Res. Care: RF2, RF3, RF4, RFA, RFE, RFH, RFI, RFM, RFP, RFT, TLGRelative home: KHB, KHM, KHO, KHU, RHB, RHM, RHO, RHUOther: CTO, DET, ILA, JHO, LGS, MMD, MMH, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS

Placement Types:ADF Adoption by foster parent MMD Medical facilityADO Adoption by other MMH Mental health facilityADR Adoption by relative RF2 Residential treatment facility-Level 2CFP Career foster parent RF3 Residential treatment facility-Level 3CTO Non-Licensed/Court ordered placement RF4 Residential treatment facility-Level 4DET Detention RFA Residential treatment facilityFAH Foster adoptive home RFE Residential treatment facility-EmergencyFGB Behavioral foster family group home RFH Residential Foster HomeFGH Foster family group home RFI Residential treatment facility-InfantFGM Medical foster family group home RFM Residential treatment facility-MaternityFHB Behavioral foster home RFP Residential treatment facility-Initial PlacementFHE Emergency foster home RFT Residential treatment facility-HomeFHM Medical foster home Transitional/AftercareFHO Foster home RHB Behavioral relative homeILA Independent living arrangement RHM Medical relative home

JHO Juvenile court home RHO Relative home

KHB Behavioral kinship home RHU Unlicensed relative home

KHM Medical kinship home RUN Runaway

KHO Kinship home SCH School

KHU Unlicensed kinship home TLA Transitional living arrangement

LGS Legal guardianship TLG Transitional living group

TLS Transitional living scattered site

There were no children in CD custody with a last placement type of JHO, FGM, RFI or RFM.

Table 16 & Table 18.

Population data is based upon the US 2011 census released on April 5, 2012 by the

U.S. Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

Table 16 & Table 29.

Age is calculated as of the end of the fiscal year.



Table 20. Length of stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1.

Table 22 & Figure 13.

Closing categories include the following closing reasons:

Returned home: Goal achieved - returned child to parent(s)

Achieved independence: Goal achieved - child independence

Legal guardianship: Legal guardianship awarded

Other agency: Care and custody with other agency

Other: Married, runaway, returned child to sending state, adoption,

adoption subsidy terminated, deceased, child of youth in

Alternative Care (CYAC) and other

Table 23. TPR Completed based on children active on the last day of the fiscal year; adoptions

are based on children active/adopted during the fiscal year.

Temporary adoptive custody includes Legal Status 2 children.

Table 23, Table 28, Table 36 & Figure 15.

Finalized adoptions include children entering Legal Status 5 during the fiscal year

who had a prior Legal Status 1 spell. Children entering Legal Status 5 multiple times

with the same vendor are only counted once.

Table 24. Legal Status categories include the following:

Legal Status 1: Care and custody with CD (includes temporary custody)

Legal Status 2: Temporary custody with adoptive parents

Legal Status 3: Supervision only by CD

Legal Status 4: Care and custody with juvenile court or other agency

Legal Status 5: Final custody awarded to adoptive parents

Legal Status 6: CD relieved of legal responsibility

Legal Status 7: Children of Youth in Alternative Care

Legal Status 8: Chafee Independence Program

Legal Status 9: Subsidized guardianship

Legal Status V: Voluntary placement

Table 25. Goals:

Goal 01: Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s)

Goal AD: Adoption

Goal 05: Children of Youth in Alternative Care

Goal 06: Child independence/Independent Living

Goal 07: Guardianship

Goal 08: Living with other relatives

Goal 09: Case plan goal not yet established


Includes children entering Legal Status 1 during the fiscal years.


Includes children exiting Legal Status 1 during the fiscal years.


Missouri Children's Division FY 2015 Report

Intensive In-Home Services


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 37. Families Referred to IIS during FY 2015 by Referral County

COUNTY

NORTHWEST ANDREW 1 6.7% 14 93.3% 0 0.0% 15ATCHISON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2BUCHANAN 17 12.5% 119 87.5% 0 0.0% 136CALDWELL 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3CARROLL 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2CASS 24 53.3% 19 42.2% 2 4.4% 45CHARITON 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 7CLAY 15 37.5% 25 62.5% 0 0.0% 40CLINTON 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 9COOPER 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5DAVIESS 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1DE KALB 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 9GENTRY 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 4GRUNDY 6 54.5% 5 45.5% 0 0.0% 11HARRISON 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0JOHNSON 10 58.8% 7 41.2% 0 0.0% 17LAFAYETTE 12 85.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 14LINN 11 64.7% 6 35.3% 0 0.0% 17LIVINGSTON 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6MERCER 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1NODAWAY 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 9PETTIS 22 61.1% 14 38.9% 0 0.0% 36PLATTE 6 50.0% 6 50.0% 0 0.0% 12PUTNAM 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 5RAY 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4SALINE 11 55.0% 9 45.0% 0 0.0% 20SULLIVAN 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0*REGION TOTAL* 183 41.5% 255 57.8% 3 0.7% 441

NORTHEAST ADAIR 19 48.7% 20 51.3% 0 0.0% 39AUDRAIN 19 76.0% 6 24.0% 0 0.0% 25BOONE 37 55.2% 30 44.8% 0 0.0% 67CALLAWAY 13 61.9% 8 38.1% 0 0.0% 21CLARK 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 11COLE 22 51.2% 19 44.2% 2 4.7% 43FRANKLIN 19 86.4% 3 13.6% 0 0.0% 22GASCONADE 9 52.9% 8 47.1% 0 0.0% 17HOWARD 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 10JEFFERSON 76 46.3% 88 53.7% 0 0.0% 164KNOX 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2LEWIS 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 12LINCOLN 10 23.8% 32 76.2% 0 0.0% 42MACON 11 68.8% 5 31.3% 0 0.0% 16MARION 5 17.2% 24 82.8% 0 0.0% 29MONROE 0 0.0% 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 8MONTGOMERY 13 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13OSAGE 2 20.0% 8 80.0% 0 0.0% 10PIKE 8 19.5% 33 80.5% 0 0.0% 41RALLS 2 15.4% 11 84.6% 0 0.0% 13RANDOLPH 27 71.1% 11 28.9% 0 0.0% 38SCHUYLER 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3SCOTLAND 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 7SHELBY 9 56.3% 7 43.8% 0 0.0% 16ST. CHARLES 37 33.6% 71 64.5% 2 1.8% 110WARREN 16 66.7% 8 33.3% 0 0.0% 24*REGION TOTAL* 386 48.1% 413 51.4% 4 0.5% 803

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 12 70.6% 5 29.4% 0 0.0% 17BUTLER 16 9.5% 152 90.5% 0 0.0% 168CAPE GIRARDEAU 51 60.0% 33 38.8% 1 1.2% 85CARTER 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2CRAWFORD 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7DENT 8 53.3% 6 40.0% 1 6.7% 15DUNKLIN 2 3.9% 49 96.1% 0 0.0% 51

REFERRRALSREFERRALS NOT ACCEPTEDREFERRALS ACCEPTED ACCEPTED FOR SCREENINGREFERRALS TOTAL


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 37. (continued) Families Referred to IIS during FY 2015 by Referral County

COUNTY

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 12IRON 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3MADISON 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 0 0.0% 11MARIES 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 7MISSISSIPPI 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2NEW MADRID 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 8OREGON 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1PEMISCOT 17 85.0% 3 15.0% 0 0.0% 20PERRY 23 85.2% 4 14.8% 0 0.0% 27PHELPS 10 35.7% 17 60.7% 1 3.6% 28PULASKI 13 37.1% 22 62.9% 0 0.0% 35REYNOLDS 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2RIPLEY 7 12.5% 49 87.5% 0 0.0% 56SCOTT 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 0 0.0% 13SHANNON 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0% 2ST. FRANCOIS 34 68.0% 16 32.0% 0 0.0% 50STE. GENEVIEVE 13 44.8% 16 55.2% 0 0.0% 29STODDARD 28 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28TEXAS 8 38.1% 13 61.9% 0 0.0% 21WASHINGTON 16 72.7% 6 27.3% 0 0.0% 22WAYNE 4 44.4% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 9*REGION TOTAL* 307 42.0% 421 57.6% 3 0.4% 731

SOUTHWEST BARRY 10 33.3% 20 66.7% 0 0.0% 30BARTON 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4BATES 5 41.7% 7 58.3% 0 0.0% 12BENTON 5 45.5% 6 54.5% 0 0.0% 11CAMDEN 12 63.2% 7 36.8% 0 0.0% 19CEDAR 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 10CHRISTIAN 25 55.6% 20 44.4% 0 0.0% 45DADE 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3DALLAS 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 10DOUGLAS 8 66.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 12GREENE 110 51.6% 103 48.4% 0 0.0% 213HENRY 6 12.8% 41 87.2% 0 0.0% 47HICKORY 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1JASPER 34 27.4% 89 71.8% 1 0.8% 124LACLEDE 26 44.8% 32 55.2% 0 0.0% 58LAWRENCE 16 47.1% 18 52.9% 0 0.0% 34MCDONALD 3 11.5% 23 88.5% 0 0.0% 26MILLER 11 68.8% 4 25.0% 1 6.3% 16MONITEAU 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8MORGAN 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 0 0.0% 13NEWTON 25 29.4% 60 70.6% 0 0.0% 85OZARK 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5POLK 8 33.3% 16 66.7% 0 0.0% 24ST. CLAIR 3 25.0% 9 75.0% 0 0.0% 12STONE 10 52.6% 9 47.4% 0 0.0% 19TANEY 31 41.3% 44 58.7% 0 0.0% 75VERNON 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 7WEBSTER 18 47.4% 20 52.6% 0 0.0% 38WRIGHT 22 78.6% 6 21.4% 0 0.0% 28*REGION TOTAL* 432 43.7% 555 56.1% 2 0.2% 989

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 138 50.7% 127 46.7% 7 2.6% 272*REGION TOTAL* 138 50.7% 127 46.7% 7 2.6% 272

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 175 54.5% 146 45.5% 0 0.0% 321ST. LOUIS COUNTY 254 56.2% 194 42.9% 4 0.9% 452*REGION TOTAL* 429 55.5% 340 44.0% 4 0.5% 773

STATE TOTAL 1,875 46.8% 2,111 52.7% 23 0.6% 4,009

REFERRALS TOTALREFERRALS ACCEPTED REFERRALS NOT ACCEPTED ACCEPTED FOR SCREENING REFERRRALS


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 38. Families and Children Accepted into IIS during FY 2015 by Household County

COUNTY

NORTHWEST ANDREW 1 4 4.0 4 4.0ATCHISON 2 7 3.5 7 3.5BUCHANAN 17 44 2.6 31 1.8CALDWELL 3 6 2.0 4 1.3CARROLL 1 1 1.0 1 1.0CASS 24 51 2.1 46 1.9CHARITON 2 2 1.0 2 1.0CLAY 15 45 3.0 41 2.7CLINTON 7 16 2.3 15 2.1COOPER 3 9 3.0 8 2.7DAVIESS 1 5 5.0 5 5.0DE KALB 5 11 2.2 10 2.0GENTRY 0 0 0.0 0 0.0GRUNDY 6 16 2.7 14 2.3HARRISON 3 9 3.0 9 3.0HOLT 0 0 0.0 0 0.0JOHNSON 11 29 2.6 19 1.7LAFAYETTE 12 21 1.8 21 1.8LINN 11 22 2.0 19 1.7LIVINGSTON 4 8 2.0 8 2.0MERCER 1 1 1.0 1 1.0NODAWAY 5 6 1.2 6 1.2PETTIS 22 57 2.6 51 2.3PLATTE 6 15 2.5 15 2.5PUTNAM 2 7 3.5 7 3.5RAY 2 4 2.0 3 1.5SALINE 12 31 2.6 26 2.2SULLIVAN 4 9 2.3 9 2.3WORTH 0 0 0.0 0 0.0*REGION TOTAL* 182 436 2.4 382 2.1

NORTHEAST ADAIR 19 44 2.3 35 1.8AUDRAIN 19 47 2.5 35 1.8BOONE 40 97 2.4 70 1.8CALLAWAY 13 38 2.9 24 1.8CLARK 10 23 2.3 20 2.0COLE 21 61 2.9 56 2.7FRANKLIN 19 40 2.1 33 1.7GASCONADE 10 33 3.3 20 2.0HOWARD 8 17 2.1 17 2.1JEFFERSON 69 167 2.4 147 2.1KNOX 0 0 0.0 0 0.0LEWIS 8 20 2.5 15 1.9LINCOLN 9 26 2.9 18 2.0MACON 10 30 3.0 23 2.3MARION 5 9 1.8 7 1.4MONROE 0 0 0.0 0 0.0MONTGOMERY 12 31 2.6 24 2.0OSAGE 1 2 2.0 2 2.0PIKE 8 21 2.6 13 1.6RALLS 2 6 3.0 6 3.0RANDOLPH 24 60 2.5 46 1.9SCHUYLER 2 4 2.0 3 1.5SCOTLAND 4 12 3.0 12 3.0SHELBY 8 21 2.6 18 2.3ST. CHARLES 38 85 2.2 81 2.1WARREN 15 35 2.3 28 1.9*REGION TOTAL* 374 929 2.5 753 2.0

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 14 38 2.7 27 1.9BUTLER 16 49 3.1 44 2.8CAPE GIRARDEAU 47 108 2.3 81 1.7CARTER 0 0 0.0 0 0.0CRAWFORD 7 20 2.9 17 2.4DENT 8 18 2.3 15 1.9DUNKLIN 1 2 2.0 2 2.0

AVERAGE NUMBEROF AT-RISK CHILDREN

PER FAMILY

TOTALFAMILIESACCEPTED

TOTALCHILDRENACCEPTED

OF CHILDRENPER FAMILY

AVERAGE NUMBER AT-RISKCHILDRENACCEPTED


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 38. (continued) Families and Children Accepted into IIS during FY 2015 by Household County

COUNTY

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 8 19 2.4 19 2.4IRON 1 2 2.0 1 1.0MADISON 9 21 2.3 19 2.1MARIES 3 6 2.0 5 1.7MISSISSIPPI 3 10 3.3 8 2.7NEW MADRID 3 12 4.0 10 3.3OREGON 1 2 2.0 2 2.0PEMISCOT 18 41 2.3 41 2.3PERRY 23 45 2.0 33 1.4PHELPS 9 21 2.3 17 1.9PULASKI 14 34 2.4 27 1.9REYNOLDS 2 4 2.0 4 2.0RIPLEY 6 18 3.0 15 2.5SCOTT 8 16 2.0 15 1.9SHANNON 0 0 0.0 0 0.0ST. FRANCOIS 33 71 2.2 56 1.7STE. GENEVIEVE 13 32 2.5 23 1.8STODDARD 29 78 2.7 66 2.3TEXAS 6 16 2.7 13 2.2WASHINGTON 18 46 2.6 25 1.4WAYNE 3 10 3.3 6 2.0*REGION TOTAL* 303 739 2.4 591 2.0

SOUTHWEST BARRY 9 31 3.4 31 3.4BARTON 3 4 1.3 3 1.0BATES 5 13 2.6 12 2.4BENTON 4 12 3.0 7 1.8CAMDEN 11 21 1.9 17 1.5CEDAR 10 29 2.9 21 2.1CHRISTIAN 22 44 2.0 38 1.7DADE 3 13 4.3 13 4.3DALLAS 6 10 1.7 7 1.2DOUGLAS 8 23 2.9 19 2.4GREENE 110 238 2.2 219 2.0HENRY 6 13 2.2 13 2.2HICKORY 1 2 2.0 2 2.0JASPER 33 76 2.3 64 1.9LACLEDE 27 71 2.6 66 2.4LAWRENCE 16 41 2.6 27 1.7MCDONALD 3 7 2.3 6 2.0MILLER 11 23 2.1 22 2.0MONITEAU 7 19 2.7 18 2.6MORGAN 8 21 2.6 21 2.6NEWTON 24 50 2.1 43 1.8OZARK 4 9 2.3 7 1.8POLK 8 21 2.6 20 2.5ST. CLAIR 3 4 1.3 3 1.0STONE 10 25 2.5 25 2.5TANEY 31 78 2.5 76 2.5VERNON 4 9 2.3 8 2.0WEBSTER 16 32 2.0 30 1.9WRIGHT 21 49 2.3 38 1.8*REGION TOTAL* 424 988 2.3 876 2.1

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 134 385 2.9 304 2.3*REGION TOTAL* 134 385 2.9 304 2.3

ST. LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 177 478 2.7 407 2.3ST. LOUIS COUNTY 254 656 2.6 559 2.2*REGION TOTAL* 431 1,134 2.6 966 2.2

STATE TOTAL 1,848 4,611 2.5 3,872 2.1

ACCEPTED ACCEPTED PER FAMILY ACCEPTED PER FAMILYFAMILIES CHILDREN OF CHILDREN CHILDREN OF AT-RISK CHILDREN

TOTAL TOTAL AVERAGE NUMBER AT-RISK AVERAGE NUMBER


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 39. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS during FY 2015

COUNTY

NORTHWEST ANDREW 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 ATCHISON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 BUCHANAN 14 93.3% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 15 CALDWELL 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 CARROLL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 CASS 17 77.3% 5 22.7% 0 0.0% 22 CHARITON 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 CLAY 16 94.1% 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 17 CLINTON 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 7 COOPER 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 DAVIESS 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 DE KALB 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 GENTRY 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 GRUNDY 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 HARRISON 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 HOLT 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 JOHNSON 10 76.9% 3 23.1% 0 0.0% 13 LAFAYETTE 9 69.2% 4 30.8% 0 0.0% 13 LINN 11 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11

LIVINGSTON 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 MERCER 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 NODAWAY 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 PETTIS 17 73.9% 5 21.7% 1 4.3% 23 PLATTE 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6

PUTNAM 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 RAY 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 SALINE 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 10 SULLIVAN 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 4 WORTH 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 * REGION TOTAL * 145 78.8% 37 20.1% 2 1.1% 184

NORTHEAST ADAIR 15 75.0% 5 25.0% 0 0.0% 20 AUDRAIN 14 66.7% 5 23.8% 2 9.5% 21 BOONE 25 67.6% 12 32.4% 0 0.0% 37

CALLAWAY 10 71.4% 4 28.6% 0 0.0% 14 CLARK 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 0 0.0% 9 COLE 11 47.8% 11 47.8% 1 4.3% 23 FRANKLIN 12 63.2% 6 31.6% 1 5.3% 19 GASCONADE 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9 HOWARD 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 JEFFERSON 56 72.7% 20 26.0% 1 1.3% 77

KNOX 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 LEWIS 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9 LINCOLN 10 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 MACON 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 9 MARION 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 5 MONROE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 MONTGOMERY 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 10 OSAGE 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 PIKE 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9 RALLS 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 RANDOLPH 16 72.7% 6 27.3% 0 0.0% 22 SCHUYLER 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 SCOTLAND 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4 SHELBY 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 ST. CHARLES 25 83.3% 4 13.3% 1 3.3% 30 WARREN 14 93.3% 1 6.7% 0 0.0% 15 * REGION TOTAL * 272 73.3% 92 24.8% 7 1.9% 371

SOUTHEAST BOLLINGER 7 70.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 10 BUTLER 8 50.0% 8 50.0% 0 0.0% 16 CAPE GIRARDEAU 30 76.9% 9 23.1% 0 0.0% 39 CARTER 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 CRAWFORD 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 6

DENT 8 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 DUNKLIN 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1

FAMILIES INTACTALL FAMILIES

EXITINGFAMILIES NOT INTACT OTHER


Intensive In-Home ServicesTable 39. (continued) Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS during FY 2015

COUNTY

SOUTHEAST HOWELL 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 IRON 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 MADISON 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 7

MARIES 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 MISSISSIPPI 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 NEW MADRID 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3

OREGON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 PEMISCOT 15 83.3% 3 16.7% 0 0.0% 18 PERRY 18 85.7% 2 9.5% 1 4.8% 21 PHELPS 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 PULASKI 5 41.7% 7 58.3% 0 0.0% 12 REYNOLDS 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 RIPLEY 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5 SCOTT 3 42.9% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 7 SHANNON 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 ST. FRANCOIS 18 50.0% 16 44.4% 2 5.6% 36 STE. GENEVIEVE 8 72.7% 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 11 STODDARD 23 82.1% 5 17.9% 0 0.0% 28 TEXAS 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5 WASHINGTON 10 66.7% 3 20.0% 2 13.3% 15 WAYNE 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 * REGION TOTAL * 195 69.9% 76 27.2% 8 2.9% 279

SOUTHWEST BARRY 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 0 0.0% 10 BARTON 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 BATES 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 BENTON 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 CAMDEN 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 11 CEDAR 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9

CHRISTIAN 12 57.1% 9 42.9% 0 0.0% 21 DADE 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 DALLAS 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 DOUGLAS 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 9 GREENE 85 82.5% 17 16.5% 1 1.0% 103 HENRY 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 5 HICKORY 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 JASPER 24 70.6% 9 26.5% 1 2.9% 34 LACLEDE 18 69.2% 8 30.8% 0 0.0% 26 LAWRENCE 8 61.5% 4 30.8% 1 7.7% 13 MCDONALD 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 4 MILLER 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 10 MONITEAU 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 7 MORGAN 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 NEWTON 19 82.6% 4 17.4% 0 0.0% 23 OZARK 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 POLK 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 ST. CLAIR 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 STONE 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0% 10 TANEY 32 86.5% 5 13.5% 0 0.0% 37 VERNON 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 WEBSTER 15 88.2% 2 11.8% 0 0.0% 17 WRIGHT 16 80.0% 3 15.0% 1 5.0% 20 * REGION TOTAL * 328 78.7% 84 20.1% 5 1.2% 417

KANSAS CITY JACKSON 103 78.6% 26 19.8% 2 1.5% 131 * REGION TOTAL * 103 78.6% 26 19.8% 2 1.5% 131

ST LOUIS ST. LOUIS CITY 150 82.0% 28 15.3% 5 2.7% 183 ST. LOUIS COUNTY 207 84.5% 27 11.0% 11 4.5% 245 * REGION TOTAL * 357 83.4% 55 12.9% 16 3.7% 428

STATE TOTAL 1,400 77.3% 370 20.4% 40 2.2% 1,810

ALL FAMILIESFAMILIES INTACT FAMILIES NOT INTACT OTHER EXITING



Referrals

Fiscal Referrals Referrals Accepted for Total

Year Accepted Not Accepted Screening Referrals

FY 2011 1,787 2,441 8 4,236

FY 2012 1,759 -1.6% 2,538 4.0% 15 87.5% 4,312 1.8%

FY 2013 1,912 8.7% 2,081 -18.0% 22 46.7% 4,015 -6.9%

FY 2014 1,934 1.2% 2,073 -0.4% 12 -45.5% 4,019 0.1%

FY 2015 1,875 -3.1% 2,111 1.8% 23 91.7% 4,009 -0.2%


Percent Change

from Prior Year

Table 40. Families Referred to IIS

from Prior Year

Percent Change Percent Change

from Prior Year

Percent Change

from Prior Year

Figure 16. Families Referred to IIS during FY 2015

FY 2011 - 2015

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%


Referrals Accepted Referrals Not Accepted Accepted for Screening



Fiscal Family Family FamiliesYear Intact Not Intact Other Exiting

FY 2011 1,375 354 61 1,790

FY 2012 1,369 -0.4% 321 -9.3% 37 -39.3% 1,727 -3.5%

FY 2013 1,387 1.3% 367 14.3% 44 18.9% 1,798 4.1%

FY 2014 1,459 5.2% 398 8.4% 51 15.9% 1,908 6.1%

FY 2015 1,400 -4.0% 370 -7.0% 40 -21.6% 1,810 -5.1%


Table 41. Exit Status of Families Exiting IISFY 2011 - 2015

Figure 17. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS during FY 2015

Percent Change Percent Change Percent Change Percent Change

from Prior Year from Prior Year from Prior Year from Prior Year

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis State Total

Family Intact Family Not Intact Other



At-Risk

Fiscal Families Children Children

Year Accepted Accepted Accepted

FY 2011 1,766 4,472 3,330

FY 2012 1,728 -2.2% 4,580 2.4% 3,519 5.7%

FY 2013 1,876 8.6% 4,864 6.2% 3,820 8.6%

FY 2014 1,916 2.1% 4,988 2.5% 4,083 6.9%

FY 2015 1,848 -3.5% 4,611 -7.6% 3,872 -5.2%


FY 2011 - 2015

Figure 18. Families and Children Accepted into IIS

Table 42. Families and Children Accepted into IISFY 2011 - 2015

Percent Change Percent Change Percent Change

from Prior Year from Prior Year from Prior Year

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

Families Accepted Children Accepted At-Risk Children Accepted



Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables and Figures


Table 39, Table 41, Figure 17.

Only those families with an exit date during the fiscal year and an exit status not missing

are included.

Exit status includes the following status codes:

Family intact 10 Family intact

Family not intact 12 Child ran away

13 Child moved out of home (not placed)

14 Child living with relative or guardian (not court ordered)

15 Child living with relative or guardian (court ordered)

16 In foster home or group home

17 In residential facility

18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services)

19 In Juvenile Justice

20 In-patient psychiatric treatment

Other 11 Can't locate family

21 Information not available

99 Other


missouri department of social services children's division ... · northwest northeast...

Documents