mistake-proofing: improving the design of tools and tasks john grout
TRANSCRIPT
Here are some photos of mistake-proofing solutions
Mistake-proofing is the use of process design features* to facilitate correct actions, prevent simple errors, or mitigate the negative impact of errors.
*these process design features can be referred to as “devices” or “counter-measures”
A discussion of the interaction of tools, tasks and people
– SEIPS interventions where tools interact with task and person
A discussion of the interaction of tools, tasks and people
• Principal findings – Simplification (process mapping, visual
systems (a.k.a. 5S))– Designing benign failures to avoid errors– Facilitating correct action
Interaction of tools, tasks and people: Visual Systems
Simple design changes that make compliance with IHI’s VAP Best practice bundle easy to check visually.
Interaction of tools, tasks and people: Designing Benign Failures
Medical and non-medical examples see the difference?
A discussion of the interaction of tools, tasks and people
• Challenges and remaining questions – Assessing FMEA recommended actions.
How design-oriented is it?– Leveraging existing examples to reduce the
creativity needed in design.
Translating What into How
Error typologySolution typology
Error
Solution
Abstract
Concrete
Examples
Hinckley’s 18 error categories
Hinckley’s 167 solution methods
Your errors
YourSolutions
150 Examples from book
Misread, mismeasure, misinterpret information
Main Category: information errors Detailed category:misread, mismeasure, misinterpret
15 make labels easy-to-read 7.6, 7.7, 7.28
18 eliminate transcriptions 8.18
22 distinguish related items by color (color coding) 7.7
25makes subtle distinctions obvious with organization and information 7.7
26 38
use graphics to simplify or clarify complexity and make interpretation easy 7.18
28look-alike items must have distinctive labeling 5.13B, 6.14, 7.5,
7.6, 5.21 (live strong)
30 provide information in units needed (avoid conversions) 7.1
32 make location of supplies accuated and obvious 8.18
34 check for compliance to specification limits 7.17, 8.14
40 print a required dimension guide on the worksheet 7.17
85 processes are designed to be standard operations 8.9
109 automate the execution 8.15, 8.18
135 print information once 6.10, 7.18
28. look-alike items must have distinctive labeling 5.13B, 5.21, 6.14, 7.5, 7.6,
Main Category: information errors Detailed category: misread, mismeasure, misinterpret
5.21
5.13B
28. look-alike items must have distinctive labeling 5.13B, 6.14, 7.5, 7.6, 5.21
Main Category: information errors Detailed category: misread, mismeasure, misinterpret
7.57.6
6.14