mistake proofing techniques

28
Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 1 ©The British Standards Institution 2008 Mistake Proofing Techniques 2 SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 Learning Objectives At the end of this section delegates will be able to: Explain the role of Mistake Proofing within Lean Six Sigma Recognise that defects can be eliminated (100% of the time) Understand that Mistake Proofing should be focused on process steps that rely on operator vigilance and concentration Recognise that simple, low cost devices can be the most effective solutions Use a simple process for implementing a Mistake Proofing system

Upload: neha204

Post on 01-Jan-2016

96 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

mistake proofing, lean, six sigma, syringe, andon,

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 1 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

Mistake Proofing Techniques

2

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Learning Objectives

At the end of this section delegates will be able to:

• Explain the role of Mistake Proofing within Lean Six Sigma

• Recognise that defects can be eliminated (100% of the time)

• Understand that Mistake Proofing should be focused on process steps that rely on operator vigilance and concentration

• Recognise that simple, low cost devices can be the most effective solutions

• Use a simple process for implementing a Mistake Proofing system

Page 2: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 2 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

3

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

History of Error Proofing

• Dr Shigeo Shingo attributed with developing the methods

• Originally called Idiot Proofing but recognised that this label

could offend workers so changed to Mistake Proofing (Poka

Yoke in Japanese)

• Literally translated

• Yokeru: to avoid

• Poka: inadvertent errors

• Target of Zero Defects and elimination of QC Inspection

4

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Human Error

• Humans make mistakes (errors) because of……

- Forgetfulness - Misunderstanding

- Lack of experience/skills - Lack of concentration

- Laziness - Lack of standards

- Rushing - Taking short cuts

- Malicious intent (deliberate action)

• Errors (can) lead to defects

• Defects are not inevitable and can be eliminated by the use of simple, low cost methods – zero defects

• Mistake Proofing should take over repetitive tasks that depend on vigilance or memory

Page 3: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 3 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

5

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Types of Error

Four main types of error:

Processing

1. Omitted Processing - Step in process not carried out

Eg form not checked, discount not included, invoice not sent, hole not drilled, part not cleaned

2. Processing Errors - step in process carried out incorrectly

Eg wrong discount included, invoice sent to wrong address, hole drilled in wrong place

Materials

3. Missing materials/information

Eg form not filled out completely, order not complete, screw left out

4. Wrong materials/information

Eg wrong form filled out, wrong information supplied, wrong screw used

6

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Shutdown Process

Control Process

Warn Operator

Shutdown Process

Control Flow

Warn Operator

Functions of Poka Yoke

Eliminate

Defects

Predict Defect

(about to occur)

Detect Defect

(occurred)

Page 4: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 4 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

7

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

ABC Fix Explanation Scenario

The Problem:

Automobiles are crossing the

train tracks and getting hit by

a train.

The “ C” Fix:

Place flashing cross signs at

the crossing to alert vehicles.

Dilemma: Vehicles are alerted

of oncoming trains but can still

cross. Problem not solved.

8

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

ABC Fix Explanation Scenario

The “ B” Fix:

Place cross gates at crossing to further deter crossing of vehicles.

Dilemma: Vehicles are alerted and have limited crossing ability; however does not prevent those who arbitrarily want to cross. Problem deterred but not solved.

The “A” Fix:

Build overpass for vehicles to crosstrain tracks without incident.

Dilemma: None. Problem solved.

Page 5: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 5 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

9

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Blade can stay out without operator touching it

Sharp point

Rounded point

Spring loaded--when operator lets go, the blade goes back in

Guard protecting blade only releases when button is pushed

Extra safety guards make it difficult toaccidentally contact blade

Original Box Cutter

Safety Example

10

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Elevators

• Some common safety features are listed below:

� Doors sensors detect if an object/person is blocking

entrance, if so they automatically open

� 2 separate braking systems used. The first is opened by

electrical current, if power is lost the brake closes under

high spring tension. The second is a centrifugal brake

governing the maximum speed

� A host of switches and sensors control the positioning of

the elevator

� Acceleration/deceleration alters with weight in carriage

Page 6: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 6 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

11

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Medicine (Bottles)

• Up to one in five toddlers can open medicine bottles and chemical containers, even if they have child-resistant tops

• Every year 25,000 under-fives are taken to casualty, suspected of swallowing substances ranging from medicines to household cleaning products

• One in five are admitted to hospital for treatment

• Child-resistant tops are now commonplace on most medicine bottles and household chemicals -but they are child-resistant, not child-proof

Source BBC News

12

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Electrical (Household)

• RCD (Residual Current Device)

� Automatically cuts off power supply if a leakage current to ground is detected

• Mains Socket

� Earth pin first to make and last to break contact

� Earth pin has to enter socket to move protective shields from Live and NEUTRAL connections

� Shape prevents incorrect fitment

• 3 Pin Plug

� Only fits one way round

� Ergonomically designed so it is picked up by the case

� Insulation on Live and Neutral to prevent accidental touching of pins

� If wired correctly and plug pulled out by cable, Live first to pull out, Neutral second, Earth last

� Fuse standard for plug no other fuses will fit. Maximum fuse size 13 amp

� If cover is not in place pins push back and cannot enter socket

Page 7: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 7 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

13

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Electrical (General)

• Shapes and colours extensively used to prevent equipment

being incorrectly connected

14

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Appliances

• Microwave

� Will not work until the door is shut

• Washing machine

� Will not start until door is closed

� Will not allow door to be opened until cycle is

complete

Page 8: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 8 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

15

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Low Brake Pad Warning

Indicators• Brake pad wear indicators are fitted to

most modern cars. They are made up of 2 insulated wires which fit in a hole inside the brake pad

• As brake pads wear the insulated cables become exposed and the metal brake disk connects them like a switch

• An electrical signal then lights up a warning lamp on the cars dashboard alerting the driver before the brakes fail

16

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Using Shapes and Colours

Page 9: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 9 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

17

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Software Warnings and

Reminders

18

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Using Dialogue Boxes and

Software Checks

Page 10: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 10 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

19

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Using Switches and Automatic

Braking• Safety switches need to be pressed and held before the start

levers will operate.

• Upon release of start lever, brakes automatically come on stopping the cutting blades etc

• Safety interlocks or light beams used to automatically shut down or stop processes

20

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Using Checklists

Backup generator functional6

Generator voltage (Min 220v Max 250V)5

Hydraulic pressure (Min 30 bar Max 40

bar)

4

Ailerons functional3

Altimeter calibration (+50 Metres)2

Fuel level (min 1500 Max 2500)1

Pre-flight Checklist

Page 11: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 11 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

21

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Visual Prevention Methods

• Some solutions are better

than others

• Which signs would be the

most successful in

preventing different

nationalities entering the

incorrect toilet?

Ladies Gents

22

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Using Lights, Sounds, Signs

and Barriers

Page 12: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 12 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

23

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Amsterdam Airport: Problem-Airport Cleanliness

Target Practice?!

Error Proofing and FMEA –Complimentary Techniques?

Page 13: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 13 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

History of FMEA

• First used in the 1960’s in the aerospace industry

during the Apollo missions

• In 1974, the US Navy developed MIL-STD-1629

regarding the use of FMEA

• In the late 1970’s, driven by product liability costs,

FMEA moved into U.S automotive applications

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

FMEA Inputs and Outputs

• Inputs

� Process map

� Process history

� Process technical procedures

• Outputs

� List of actions to prevent causes or to detect failure

modes

� History of actions taken

Page 14: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 14 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

FMEA Team

• Team approach is necessary

• Responsible black/green belt leads the team

• Recommended representatives:

� Operators/administrators/supervisors

� Design

� Engineering

� Operations

� Distribution

� Finance

� Information Technology

� Human Resources

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Process

Step/InputPotential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects

S

E

V

Potential Causes

O

C

C

Current Controls

D

E

T

R

P

N

Actions

Recommended

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

What is the input ?

What can go wrong with the

input?

What can be done?

What is the

effect on the

output?

What are the causes?

How bad?

How often?

How well?

(1-10) (1-10) (1-10)

Completing an FMEA

How are

these found or

prevented?

Page 15: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 15 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Definition of Terms - Failure Mode

• Definition

� The way a specific process input fails

� Will cause the effect to occur if not corrected or removed

• Examples

� Temperature too high

� Incorrect PO number

� Surface contamination

� Dropped call (customer service)

� Paint too thin

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Definition of Terms - Effect

• Definition

� Impact on customer requirements

� Generally an external customer focus, but can also include downstream processes

• Examples

� Temperature too high: paint cracks

� Incorrect PO number: accounts receivable traceability errors

� Surface contamination: poor adhesion

� Dropped call: customer dissatisfaction

� Paint too thin: poor coverage

Page 16: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 16 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Definition of Terms - Cause

• Definition

� Sources of process variation that cause the failure mode to occur

� Identification of causes starts with failure modes associated with the highest severity ratings

• Examples

� Temperature too high: thermocouple out of calibration

� Incorrect PO number: typographical error

� Surface contamination: overhead hoist systems

� Dropped call: insufficient number of CS representatives

� Paint too thin: high solvent content

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Definition of Terms - Current

Controls

• Definition

� Systematised methods / devices in place to prevent or detect failure modes or causes (before causing effects)

� Prevention consists of failsafing, automated control and setup verifications

� Controls consist of audits, checklists, inspection, laboratory testing, training, SOP’s, preventive maintenance, etc

• Which is more important to process:

improvement, prevention or detection?

Page 17: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 17 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Definition of Terms - Risk Priority Number (RPN)

• Definition

� The output of an FMEA

� A calculated number based on information you provide, regarding:

• Potential failure modes,

• Effects, and

• Current ability of the process to detect the failures before reaching the

customer

� Calculated as the product of three quantitative ratings, each one

related to the effects, causes, and controls:

RPN = Severity X Occurrence X Detection

EffectsEffects CausesCauses ControlsControls

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Risk Priority Number

• Risk Priority Number is not absolute

• Scaling for severity, occurrence and detection can

be locally developed

• Be aware of customer requirements

• Other categories can be added

� For example, one engineer added an impact score to

the RPN calculation to estimate the overall impact of the

failure mode on the process

Page 18: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 18 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Definition of Terms

• Severity (of Effect) (1 = Not Severe, 10 = Very Severe)

� Importance of effect on customer requirements

� Could also be concerned with safety and other risks if failure occurs

• Occurrence (of Cause) (1 = Not Likely, 10 = Very Likely)

� Frequency with which a given cause occurs and creates failure mode(s)

� Can sometimes refer to the frequency of a failure mode

• Detection (Capability of Current Controls) (1 = Likely to Detect, 10 = Not Likely at all to Detect)

� Ability of current control scheme to detect or prevent:

• The causes before creating failure mode

• The failure modes before causing effect

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Example Rating Scale

Rating Severity of Effect Likelihood of Occurrence Ability to Detect

10 Hazardous without warningVery high:

Cannot detect

9 Hazardous with warningFailure is almost inevitable

Very remote chance of detection

8 Loss of primary functionHigh:

Remote chance of detection

7Reduced primary function

performance

Repeated failuresVery low chance of detection

6 Loss of secondary functionModerate:

Low chance of detection

5Reduced secondary function

performance

Occasional failuresModerate chance of detection

4Minor defect noticed by most

customers

Moderately high chance of

detection

3Minor defect noticed by some

customers Low:High chance of detection

2Minor defect noticed by

discriminating customers

Relatively few failuresVery high chance of detection

1 No effect Remote: Failure is unlikely Almost certain detection

Page 19: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 19 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

37

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Process

Step

Key Process

Input

Failure Modes - What can go

wrong? Effects Causes

Current

Controls

Pour into

glassBeer volume Overflow

Wasted Beer/

Wet LapDrunk None

Glass too small Visual

Not paying

attentionNone

Too much foam

Bad Taste /

Don't get as

drunk

No tilt Visual

Pouring too highVisual and operator

training

Pouring too fastVisual and operator

training

No Foam

No beer

mustache/ Poor

taste

Flat beer Expiration date

Tilted glass Visual

Slow Pour Operator training

Empty glass No drink Too drunk None

Broken Glass Visual

No Money

Job / Process

Excellence - big

bonus

No Friends Personality

A Well-Loved Process FMEA

38

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

FMEA Hints

• Keep it simple; not complex (no wall charts)

• Must involve a team, no “lone ranger”

development

• Update it as you move through the roadmap

• Make sure the FMEA is an action tool, not just a

document; use the right half of the tool

Page 20: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 20 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

39

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

POKA YOKE Connection to the FMEA

Process

Step/InputPotential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects

S

E

V

Potential Causes

O

C

C

Current Controls

D

E

T

R

P

N

Actions

Recommended

What is the

process step/

Input under

investigation?

In what ways does the Key

Input go wrong?

What is the impact on the Key

Output Variables (Customer

Requirements) or internal

requirements?

How

Severe

is the

effect to

the

cusotm

er? What causes the Key Input to

go wrong?

How

often d

oes c

ause

or

FM

occur? What are the existing controls and

procedures (inspection and test)

that prevent eith the cause or the

Failure Mode? Should include an

SOP number.

How

well

can y

ou

dete

ct cause o

r F

M? What are the actions

for reducing the

occurrance of the

Cause, or improving

detection? Should

have actions only on

high RPN's or easy

fixes.

0

0

0

Good POKA YOKE devices drive down

occurrence and detection rankings.

40

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 1Process: Tightening nuts

Problem: Washers left out before tightening

Description of process: Operator adds washer and nut, then tightens using an automatic nut driver.

Prevent Error/Detect Error

Shutdown/Control/Warn

Before improvement: It is possible

to tighten the nuts even if washers are missing.

After Improvement:

Solution:

(Delete as appropriate)

(Delete as appropriate)

Nut, tightened with no washer

Nut driver

Page 21: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 21 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

41

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 2Pprocess: Parts Transport LineProblem: Parts supplied upside down to automatic machinery

Description of Process: A transportation chute feeds parts from a press into the next process. in the next process parts are mounted in the same position as they arrive.

Prevent Error/Detect Error

Shutdown/Control/Warn

Before Improvement: Operators watch

incoming work pieces carefully and remove upside down parts. some are always overlooked.

After Improvement:

Solution:

(Delete as appropriate)

(Delete as appropriate)

Upside DownCorrect Work piece

42

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 3Process: Inspecting Cassette Tape Decks

Problem: Inspection Tapes out of Sequence

Description of Process: When a cassette deck is inspected, the inspector uses a series of cassettes to check the performance of the unit. It is important that the tests are performed in the correct order and that all tests are done.

Prevent Error/Detect Error

shutdown/control/warn

Before Improvement: A slotted rack was used to store tapes. If a tape was placed on workbench or carried off then inspector could lose track and make errors.

After Improvement:

Solution:

(Delete as appropriate)

(Delete as appropriate)

1 2 3 4 5 67

Storage Rack

Page 22: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 22 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

43

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 4

The inspectors found medical notes were confusing – written up with the same “RR”initials for women needing a “routine recall”and those needing a “recall recall”, an urgent reassessment…!!!

44

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 5

Page 23: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 23 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

45

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 6

46

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 7

• City Trader buys $1000000000 worth of shares

instead of $10,000,000.00!

• Accounts pays supplier twice

• Failure to invoice customer for services provided

• Miscalculation in currency exchange

• Your experiences……..?

Page 24: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 24 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

47

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Summary

• Defects can be eliminated

• Target process steps that are repetitive and rely

on operator vigilance and checking

• Use simple, low cost devices

• Involve the operator in identifying, developing and

implementing devices

• Devices should be challenge tested by

introducing error (defect)

Solutions

Page 25: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 25 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

49

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 1Process: Tightening Nuts

Problem: Washers left out before tightening

Description of Process: Operator adds washer and nut, then tightens using an automatic nut driver.

Prevent Error/Detect Error

Shutdown/Control/Warn

Before Improvement: It is possible

to tighten the nuts even if washers are missing.

After Improvement:

Solution:

(Delete as appropriate)

(Delete as appropriate)

Nut, tightened with no washer

Nut driver Nut driverStopper

Washer

thickness

50

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 2Process: Parts transport lineProblem: Parts supplied upside down to automatic machinery

Description of Process: A transportation chute feeds parts from a press into the next process. In the next process parts are mounted in the same position as they arrive.

Prevent Error/Detect Error

Shutdown/Control/Warn

Before improvement: Operators watch

incoming work pieces carefully and remove upside down parts. Some are always overlooked.

After Improvement:

Solution:

(Delete as appropriate)

(Delete as appropriate)

Upside downCorrect Work piece

Notch

Page 26: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 26 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

51

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 3Process: Inspecting Cassette Tape Decks

Problem: Inspection tapes out of sequence

Description of Process: When a cassette deck is inspected, the inspector uses a series of cassettes to check the performance of the unit. It is important that the tests are performed in the correct order and

that all tests are done.

Prevent Error/Detect Error

Shutdown/Control/Warn

Before Improvement: A slotted rack was used to store tapes. If a tape was placed on workbench or carried off then inspector could lose track and make errors.

After Improvement:

Solution:

(Delete as appropriate)

(Delete as appropriate)

1 2 3 4 5 67

Storage rack

52

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 4

The inspectors found medical notes were confusing – written up with the same “RR”initials for women needing a “routine recall”and those needing a “recall recall”, an urgent reassessment…!!!

Page 27: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 27 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

53

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 5

54

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 6

Page 28: Mistake Proofing Techniques

Lean Six Sigma Operational - Delegate Workbook

SSG06101ENUK - MP/Issue 1.1/ September 2008 28 ©The British Standards Institution 2008

55

SSG06101ENUK – Delegate Slides/Issue 1.1/ September 2008

Poka Yoke Workshop 7

• City Trader buys $1000000000 worth of shares

instead of $10,000,000.00!

• Accounts pays supplier twice

• Failure to invoice customer for services provided

• Miscalculation in currency exchange

• Your experiences……..?