mitigating counterfeit issues through gidep- pumford karpen
TRANSCRIPT
Mitigating Counterfeit IssuesThrough GIDEP
Bill Pumford & Bob KarpenGIDEP Operations [email protected]@cscnorco.com01 OCT 2009
Agenda
• About GIDEP• Getting Started• Searching GIDEP for Reports on
Counterfeits• Submitting a Report on Counterfeits
About GIDEPMission
• Foster technical information sharing among Government agencies and Industry partners to:
• Increase systems’ safety, reliability, and readiness• Reduce systems’ development, production, and
ownership costs
4
IndustryAdvisory
Group
GIDEP Program Manager
DSPO
GIDEPOperations Center
Under Secretary of Defense(Acquisition, Technology
& Logistics)
GovernmentAdvisory
Group
Industry ParticipantRepresentatives
Government ParticipantRepresentatives
:
About GIDEPParticipants
GovernmentActivities
359
IndustryCompanies
1971
Government7%
Military9% Industry
84%
Total Users6922
About GIDEP
• Failure Experience
• Product Information
• Reliability• Engineering• Metrology
Information & Data
Statistics on Suspect Counterfeit Reporting
• Charts developed from data in Department of Commerce Survey and GIDEP database.– Historic trends in reporting– Distribution of reports by product type– Impact by Service
Number Counterfeit Reported Parts & Documents
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
No.
Doc
umen
ts
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
No.
Par
ts
Number of Documents Part per DocCumulative Number of Counterfeit Parts & Documents
Reported
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
No.
Doc
umen
ts
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
No.
Par
ts
DOC Parts
ANN submitted w/o parts
Commerce Survey indicated more than 7,000 counterfeit incidents during 2008. About 10% per cent of the activities used GIDEP to report counterfeit problems.
Commerce Survey also indicated that less than 15% of Original Component Manufacturers (OCM) and Board Assemblers either checked a database for information or submitted data to a database when coming into possession of a counterfeit part.
Data shown does not reveal instances where a GIDEP notice alerted another user who subsequently found counterfeits as a result of the notice.
243
111414
14621
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Number of NSNs
Helicopter Drive Components-1615Gas Turbines & Jet Engines-2840
Bearings-3110Centrifugals & Filters-4330
Hardware-5305Nuts & Washers-5310
Hardware-5340Semiconductors-5961
Microcircuits-5962 ADP Equipment-7025
Structural Shape, Iron & Steel-9520
Number of NSN by FSC ReportedFY 93 - 09
6722
11
14
21
17
1222
13
15
24
1
0 25 50 75
Number of Documents
MICROCIRCUITSWIRE
TOOLSSAFETY ENGINEERING
HARDWAREAMPLIFIERS
NATRANSISTORS
NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGYDELAY DEVICES
FASTENERSELECTRONIC
FILTERSVALVES
POWER DISTRIBUTIONPROTECTIVE
AIRCRAFTENGINES
CIRCUIT PROTECTIONBATTERIES
SEMICONDUCTORSCOMMUNICATIONS
Number of Documents by CategoryFY 93 - 09
Non-Electronic NSN Dist. by Services
US Air Force, 21, 33%
US Navy, 35, 54%
US Army, 5, 8%
US MARINES, 3, 5%
Electronic NSN Dist. by Services
US Air Force, 98, 15%
US MARINES, 12, 2%
US Army, 24, 4%
US Navy, 521, 79%
NSNs Reported by GIDEP in Counterfeit Documents Broken Out by WSDC and Service
0 4 8 12 16 20
Other 6 unique NSNs Effecting Weapon Platforms
BEARING,BALL,AIRFRAME 3110-01-037-6209
BEARING,BALL,AIRFRAME 3110-01-271-5982
FILTER ELEMENT,FLUID 4330-01-451-3134
SCREW,CAP,HEXAGON HEAD 5305-01-109-8015
NUT,SPRING LOADED 5310-00-331-9466
WASHER,LOCK 5310-01-105-2652
WASHER,LOCK 5310-01-126-4754
US AirForce US Navy US Army US MARINES
Breakout of Suspect Counterfeit NSNs (Non-Electronic) Impacted (by Service)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Other25 unique NSNs Effecting Weapon Platforms
TRANSISTOR 5961-01-188-6384
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-075-3772
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-112-7055
MICROCIRCUIT,DIGITAL 5962-01-248-8632
MICROCIRCUIT,MEMORY 5962-01-262-9858
MICROCIRCUIT,DIGITAL 5962-01-270-2180
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-274-1577
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-281-4172
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-283-4320
MICROCIRCUIT,MEMORY 5962-01-298-2287
MICROCIRCUIT,MEMORY 5962-01-312-0598
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-326-4308
MICROCIRCUIT,DIGITAL 5962-01-345-2677
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-350-4140
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-356-5902
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-403-2640
MICROCIRCUIT,DIGITAL 5962-01-407-6685
MICROCIRCUIT,DIGITAL 5962-01-412-9993
MICROCIRCUIT,LINEAR 5962-01-445-7189
MICROCIRCUIT,DIGITAL 5962-01-448-5204
US AirForce US Navy US Army US MARINES
Breakout of Suspect Counterfeit NSNs (Electronic) Impacted (by Service)
US Air Force (14) US Navy (337) US Army (6) US MARINES (1)
Searching GIDEP Database
1. On the GIDEP Members home page, in the left window, select:
WWW Database└ Enter NOW
SEARCH TECHNIQUES
Application Selection2. On the GIDEP Data page, select
Search Selection3. To limit our query to select data types, we’ll select “Advance Search”.
Data Selection4. At the Data Search Menu you can search across different data types. For our purpose, select the “Suspect Counterfeit” radio button.
Field Selection
Computer Entry DateDocument NumberPart IdentifierNational Stock NumberNomenclatureType DesignatorCAGE CodeManufacturer NameKeywordsValue Added WordsCategoryDocument DesignatorTitleDocument DateParticipant Code
Field Choices
Example Search - CAGE• After selecting SUSPECT COUNTERFEIT and
ADVANCED (search), select CAGE as your search field.
• Enter 01295 (Texas Instruments) as the target.
• And Submit Query
Search Results - CAGE
Example Search – Supplier
Search Results - Supplier
To List Out Group of Documents
• Check boxes to left of desired documents
Select Listing Format
Resulting Summary Report
To Select Individual Document
• Double-click on hyper-linked Document Number
Submitting Reports
• Submit draft copies of the report along with the notification letter for comment to:– The company supplying the product (REQUIRED).– The company marked on the package (RECOMMENDED)
• A sample notification letter can be found in Chap 7 (Appendix C) of the GIDEP Operations Manual. As with current GIDEP policy, allow up to 15 working days for Alerts and Problem Advisories for the supplier to response.
• Include all correspondence with the manufacturer, supplier and other participants that may help to resolve the problem.
• NOTE! The analysis of the problem (non-conformance, defect, etc.) cited by impacted company or supplier does not have to agree with the originator’s technical review.
Suspect Counterfeit Reporting
• Due to the ongoing issues associated with suspect counterfeit documents, GIDEP recommends against naming of the secondary brokers/distributors in the GIDEP form or any portion of the document originator’s discussion. If the supplier lineage information is deemed necessary, then that information can only be cited by the primary distributor in his/her response letter to the document originator’s notification.
• Submit the report to GIDEP with all notification letters and responses attached to [email protected]
Suspect Counterfeit Reporting
• PROBLEM DESCRIPTION / DISCUSSION / EFFECT– Provide the name of the supplier (broker), CAGE, and address in
first sentence– Describe as accurately and concisely, as possible, the types of
item(s) involved, number of items manufactured or involved, number of items tested, number of items non-conforming or failed, failure mode exhibited and cause of failure based upon your failure analysis.
– Provide any detailed information that may help GIDEP users determine if similar conditions may exist at the plant or activity. Attach any documentation including test reports, failure analysis, field reports, photographs, etc.
– Include the following paragraph -“Note: The manufacturer identified in block 4 is the entity whose product may have been counterfeited. This reporting convention is necessary to facilitate GIDEP database searches for suspect counterfeit products and is by no means intended to imply that the manufacturer identified in block 4 is involved with the suspect product.”
Revised Alert FormUse existing GIDEP Form as appropriate… This example shows the use of the Alert form
Insert “Suspect Counterfeit“
Put the part identifier, as marked on the product, in the ‘Part Number’ block.
Put the name of the impacted manufacturer in the ‘Manufacturer’ block. (To facilitate BOM search, not intended to impugn the impacted manufacturer.)
Put the CAGE code of the impacted manufacturer in the ‘CAGE’ block.
If approved by legal and investigative organizations, put the name of the source (e.g. broker or supplier) in the ‘DISCUSSION’ block. Include all known parties involved (e.g., other brokers involved in the supply chain).
Clarify in the DISCUSSION block the difference between the source (broker or supplier) and maker (name or logo) identified on the product. GIDEP needs to be able to distinguish for its users the difference. The source is important for the acquisition process whereas the part marking is important to the logistics community.
Revised Alert Form (continued)
Use the latest form
Submit draft copies of documents for comment to:• Company supplying suspect product (Required)• Impacted manufacturer (Recommended)After 15 working days, attach all responses and submit document to GIDEP.
GIDEP Help
• HELP DESK PERSONNEL– Bonnie Argeanton– Roberta Polder
• PHONE NUMBER– Commercial (951) 898-3207– Fax (951) 898-3250
• E-mail [email protected]• HOURS OF OPERATION• Monday-Friday, 6:00 am -
5:00 pm Pacific Time
TYPES OF ASSISTANCE• Joining GIDEP• WWW Database Access• Computer assistance• Password resets• Questions• Product registrations• Address, phone, e-mail updates• Data, Documents• Forms• Manuals• Up-coming events• Other GIDEP related items
If you need help or simply have a question, please give the GIDEP Help Desk a call.