miyo, health disparities and the long tail of cancer...
TRANSCRIPT
Matthew W. Kreuter, PhD, MPH!Washington University in St. Louis!
!!
!!!
CPCRN Investigators Meeting!Denver, CO!
October 3, 2013!!!!
MIYO, health disparities and the!Long Tail of cancer communication!
!
Collaborators!!
• Peter Hovmand, PhD!
• Debbie Pfeiffer, MA!• Chris Casey, MPH!
• Suchitra Rath, MS!• Maggie Fairchild!
• Balaji Golla!!
“At risk” perspective!!!!
“Population” perspective!
“Vulnerable population” perspective!
Why does this happen?!!
• Risk varies by socially-defined groups, not just behavioral risk factors!
!• Core risks – low education, low SES –
increase “risk of risks”, cumulative risk!!• Population interventions not as effective! !!
!
Smoking prevalence by education!U.S. adults, 2008 NHIS (n=21,781)
41!
28! 26!19!
11!6!
0!
10!
20!
30!
40!
50!
60!
GED! < 12 years! H.S.! Associate! Bachelor's! Graduate!
MMWR, 58 (44) 1227-‐1232, 2007
“Vulnerable sub-groups” approaches!!• Intersectoral!!• Participatory!!
!
-‐ Every community is unique
-‐ Customiza?on ma@ers
-‐ Locals know best
-‐ 591 registered users
-‐ 447 organiza?ons
-‐ 47 states, DC, Canada
MIYO users for CRC (through 7-‐11-‐13)
A Long Tail distribution!
PRODUCTS
Blockbusters
Long tail
POPULARITY
Figure 1. The long tail
Long Tail observation #1!!
• More niche products than blockbusters!
!!
Blockbuster vs. Niche!!
• Wide appeal, substantial sales!
! ! ! ! !vs.!• Narrow appeal, nominal sales!
!
!!
12 million!albums!
Long Tail observation #2!!
• Collectively niches make a huge market!
!!
Example 1: Online music!!
• Half of inventory sold ranked below top
5,000 sellers!• Some sold to only a few buyers per week,
worldwide!
!!
!
Example 2: Movie rentals!!
• Blockbuster stocks < 3,000 titles!
• 20% of Netflix rentals outside top 3,000!• Netflix: Bollywood rentals > 100,000/mo.!
!
!!
Example 2: Movie rentals!!
• redbox stocks < 200 titles!
!!
!
Long Tail observation #3!!
• Choice reveals true shape of demand!
!!
24 versions of EBIs
350 messages
400 images
Research questions!!
• Do MIYO products reflect a Long Tail
distribution?!!
• Are MIYO products in the Long Tail more likely to address vulnerable populations?!
!!
!
A Long Tail distribution!
PRODUCTS
Blockbusters
Long tail
POPULARITY
Figure 1. The long tail
Data for analyses!!
• March 2011 – February 2013!
• 4,351 MIYO products for CRC screening!• production details obtained from 905
• Messages chosen
• Images chosen !
!!
Analyses!!
• Plot distribution of all images selected!!
• Infer target population from MIYO images!!
• Compare racial/ethnic mix of images in head, middle and tail of the distribution!
!
!!
Defining high risk/disparity sub-groups!!
• CRC incidence or mortality > U.S. avg.!!
• Screening or 5-year survival < U.S. avg.!
• African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, American Indian/AK Native!
!
!!
Rim SH, et al (2011) MMWR Howlander N, et al. (2012) NCI SEER Cancer Statistics Review Ries LAG, et al. (2007) NIH Pub. No. 07-6215
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
Diversity in the Long Tail Frequency of images selected
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
Head Middle Long Tail
Diversity in the Long Tail Frequency of images selected
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
27 images; 339 docs (12.6) 57 images; 292 docs (5.1) 151 images; 264 docs (1.8)
Diversity in the Long Tail Frequency of images selected
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
TERTILE SPLIT OF DISTRIBUTION
RACE/ETHNICITY OF IMAGES# HEAD MIDDLE TAIL
% White
% African American
% Hispanic
% American Indian/Alaska Native
% Asian/Pacific Islander
% Indian
SMALL MEDIA AND CLIENT REMINDERS
Distinct images used 27 57 151
Total documents created 339 292 274
Mean documents created per image 12.6 5.1 1.8# p < .005 (n=235; �2=25.9, df=10)
235 IMAGES
USED 905 TIMES
35 USES
52 35 25
19 28 32
22 16 6
7 18 24
0 4 11
0 0 1
Figure 3. Diversity in the long tail
Summary!!
• With unconstrained choice, users: !• Address CRC niches in large numbers!
• Niche products addressed:!• More diverse populations!• Populations at higher CRC risk!
!!
Current approaches!!
• Can’t address every niche population!
• May shift the curve, but with disparities!!
!
Long Tail solutions!!
• Feasible with technology!
• More efficient, especially for local efforts!• MIYO as a Long Tail model!
!