mm10-uk
DESCRIPTION
muolkTRANSCRIPT
Slide 1
PLAXIS v. 8.2FEM computations in practice
Slide 2
ProgrammeMesh generationSoil–structure couplingInitial stressesGround water flowTypes of analysisIntegration algorithms
Slide 3
ProgrammeMesh generation
Element types in PLAXIS
Mesh refinement
Soil–structure couplingInitial stressesGround water flowTypes of analysisIntegration algorithms
Slide 4
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISTwo types of triangular elements (isoparametric)
Plane strain Axial symmetry
Nodes
Gauss points
6-noded element 15-noded element
Slide 5
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISShape/weight functions for 6-noded triangle
Quadratic interpolation in two (three) directions
Slide 6
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISShape/weight functions for 6-noded triangle
Quadratic interpolation in two (three) directions
Slide 7
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISShape/weight functions for 15-noded triangle
4th order interpolation in two (three) directions
Slide 8
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISShape/weight functions for 15-noded triangle
4th order interpolation in two (three) directions
Slide 9
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISAdvantages of higher order elements
Good for the description of continuous strain and stress variations, e.g. failure in a zone
Good description of a continuous displacement field with relatively few elements
Disadvantages of higher order elements Failure loads may be dependent on the mesh Poor description of discontinuous stress and strain,
e.g. failure along a line
Note: According to the manual, the 15-noded element is superior. However, you should test whether two grids provide the same result.
Slide 10
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISFailure along a line modelled with CST-elements
Slide 11
Mesh generation: Element types in PLAXISFailure along a line modelled with higher-order
elements
Slide 12
Mesh generation: Mesh RefinementPLAXIS: automatic unstructured mesh generation
No possibility of making a so-called structured mesh The mesh size cannot be set explicitly The mesh is generated based on random seeds
The mesh size may be changed implicitly Globally by means of global coarseness Locally by means of local coarseness
Slide 13
Mesh generation: Mesh RefinementGlobal coarseness
Average “element length” in the entire model
Very coarse: nc = 25 approx. 50 elements
Coarse: nc = 50 approx. 100 elements
Medium: nc = 100 approx. 250 elements
Fine: nc = 200 approx. 500 elements
Very fine: nc = 400 approx. 1000 elements
Note: The number of elements is independent of type
Coarseness
Slide 14
Mesh generation: Mesh RefinementDefinition of Local coarseness
At a point Along a line
Slide 15
Mesh generation: Mesh RefinementDefinition of Local coarseness
At a point Along a line
Note: A line = two points
Slide 16
ProgramMesh generationSoil–structure couplingInitial stressesGround water flow Types of analysisIntegration algorithms
Slide 17
Soil–Structure CouplingInterface strength defined by Mohr-Coulomb
Elastic behaviour at an interface:
Plastic behaviour at an interface:
Reduced parameters
Adhesion:
Friction:
Dilatation: for else
Rigid interface (Rinter = 1.0)
Applied at interfaces between soil and soil
Slide 18
Soil–Structure Coupling
Slide 19
In manual settings for interfaces, overlap and slip between soil and structure can be allowed
Id the slip/overlap becomes too big, the system of equations becomes ill-conditioned (inaccurate)
The fictive thickness ti of the interface can be set, so that the problem is avoided
Soil–Structure Coupling
Slide 20
Permeability Interfaces in PLAXIS are always fully impermeable Inactive interfaces are fully permeable Interfaces can be turned off in the flow phase
Note: Plates are fully permeable!
Real thickness of interface, δinter
Only used in the Hardening Soil model Typical thickness: δinter = a few grain diameters
Used in the computation of changes of the void ratio related to dilatation cut-off
Significant impact on the capacity of tension piles
Soil–Structure Coupling
Slide 21
Real thickness of interface, δinter
Significant impact on the capacity of tension piles
Soil–Structure Coupling
Slide 22
ProgrammeMesh generationSoil–structure couplingInitial stresses
Effective stresses Pore pressure
Ground water flowTypes of analysisIntegration algorithms
Slide 23
Initial stresses: Effective StressesOver-Consolidation Ratio (OCR)Pre-Overburden Pressure (POP)
Slide 24
Initial stresses: Effective StressesPre-consolidation pressure
Jaky’s equation: (used in HS)
is applied in order to determine which provides the position of the cap in the Hardening Soil model
Slide 25
Initial stresses: Effective StressesRatio between horizontal and vertical stress:
Slide 26
Initial stresses: Effective StressesProcedures for determination of initial stresses
The K0-procedure for (nearly) horizontally layered soil
Gravity loading for all other situations
Note: No strength of cohesion-less soil w/o load
Slide 27
Initial stresses: Effective StressesThe K0-procedure for horizontally layered soil
Initial stresses defined in “Initial Conditions”
For full gravity, in addition to K0 one must define
To avoid points with plastic behaviour, the at-rest earth pressure coefficient must lie within a given interval, here given for the case of cohesion-less soil
Slide 28
Initial stresses: Effective StressesThe K0-procedure for horizontally layered soil
If the state of stress found by the K0-procedure does not provide static equilibrium, a plastic nil-step is included, i.e. a step with no additional load
If the K0-procedure provides completely misleading results, the solution of the plastic nil-step may diverge
At the end of the plastic nil-step, it is recommended to “Reset displacements to zero” (check this option)
Slide 29
Initial stresses: Effective StressesGravity loading
Initial stresses are equal to zero (in the computation) The weight of soil is introduced as a body force Often plastic behaviour is observed at a number of
integration points in the finite element model This happens in cohesion-less soil, unless
A number of plastic points can be accepted Poisson’s ratio should be set so that a realistic value
of the at-rest earth pressure is obtained All displacements are reset after the gravitation step
Slide 30
Initial stresses: Pore PressureTotal pore pressure in PLAXIS
pactive = psteady + pexcess
Excess pore pressure can only be determined in undrained conditions: “Cluster is Undrained”
Two different approaches Phreatic level ~ simple definition Ground water flow ~ (anisotropic) Laplace equation
Slide 31
Initial stresses: Pore PressureGround water table (phreatic levels)
Generally In a cluster
Note: Phreatic level is defined at geometry lines
Inaccurate Accurate
Slide 32
Initial stresses: Pore PressureGround water table (phreatic levels)
Generally In a cluster
Slide 33
Initial stresses: Pore PressureGround water flow
Steady state• Solution of Laplace (or Poisson) equation
Boundary conditions• Dirichlet: potential = position of ground water
table• Neumann: flux = flow through a boundary• Seepage: mixture of Dirichlet and Neumann
conditions
Slide 34
Initial stresses: Pore PressureComputation
Phreatic level• Approximate solution• All clusters turned on, whether they are active or not• This is avoided by the setting “Cluster is dry”
Ground water flow• Better, but more “expensive”• Only active clusters are included
Note: Time dependent flow can be analysed with the PLAXIS Groundwater Flow module
Slide 35
ProgrammeMesh generationSoil–structure couplingInitial stressesGround water flow
Steady state solution Consolidation
Types of analysisIntegration algorithms
Slide 36
Ground water flow: Steady State SolutionDarcy’s law
,
Flow in the direction of decreasing potential
Potential (groundwater head [m])
Seepage velocity [m/s]
Permeability [m/s]
Vertical position [m]
Pore pressure [Pa]
Slide 37
Ground water flow: Steady State SolutionEquation of continuity for incompressible fluid
Note: kx = ky → Laplaceequation in the potential
Slide 38
Ground water flow: Steady State SolutionPermeability in partially saturated soil
Reduction factor
VS
Slide 39
Ground water flow: Steady State SolutionDiscretization
,
Local: ,
Global: , p = w ( y - )
Gradient of shape functions
Potential in the element nodes
Inflow at nodes [m3/s]
Slide 40
Ground water flow: Steady State SolutionExample: Flow under a dam
NB: Interface instead of a plate
Slide 41
Ground water flow: Steady State SolutionExample: Flow under a dam
Note: Interface instead of a plate
Slide 42
Ground water flow: ConsolidationEffective stresses and pore pressure
Effective stress rate and strain rate
,
Interpolation
, ,
Slide 43
Ground water flow: ConsolidationFE formulation of the equations of equilibrium
Note: The residual leads to a self-correcting solution
Internal forces (weight)
Surface traction
Residual
Slide 44
Ground water flow: ConsolidationFE formulation of the equations of equilibrium
Incremental equilibrium:
Stiffness of grain skeleton:
Coupling matrix:
External forces:
Constitutive matrix
Slide 45
Ground water flow: ConsolidationEquation of continuity for an incompressible fluid
Steady state part of the solution
Porosity (pore volume/grain volume)
Bulk modulus for pore fluid
Slide 46
Ground water flow: ConsolidationFE formulation of the equations of continuity
Note: q = 0 in PLAXIS 8.2
Flux through the boundary
Slide 47
Ground water flow: ConsolidationCombined system of equations
Incremental form (elastic material)
,
Slide 48
ProgramMesh generationSoil–structure couplingInitial stressesGround water flowTypes of analysis
Plastic calculation c-φ-reduction
Integration algorithms
Slide 49
Types of analysis: Plastic CalculationPrimary loading to ultimate failureMaterial behaviour
Elastic Plastic Pore pressure
Geometry Normal computation: linear (small strain) Updated Mesh: Updated Lagrange formulation
• Strengthening of anchors during deformation• Large deformations ~ soft soil deposits• May follow a “normal” (i.e. geometrically linear) computation
by use of the option “Reset displacements to zero”• A “normal” computation cannot follow an UM computation
Slide 50
Types of analysis: c-φ-reductionDetermination of factors of safety
Sf =
Same reduction of cohesion and friction terms
Initial value: ΣMsf = 0.1
Subsequent values are found automatically
Slide 51
ProgrammeMesh generationSoil–structure couplingInitial stressesGround water flowTypes of analysisIntegration algorithms
Tolerated error Over relaxation Maximum iterations Desired minimum and maximum Arc-length control
Slide 52
Integration Algorithms
Slide 53
Integration Algorithms: Tolerated ErrorSet by the parameter tolerated errorThe default is 0.03 ( total external load)
Slide 54
Integration Algorithms: Over RelaxationApplied in order to speed up the processUpper limit
Theoretical: 2.0 In practice: 1.5
Slide 55
Integration Algorithms: Maximum IterationsPermitted number of iterations in a load step
The default value of Maximum iterations is 50 Values of 1 to 100 are possible If more iterations are needed, a warning is given in
the Log info box on the General page
Slide 56
Integration Algorithms: Desired Min. & Max.Desired minimum and maximum number of
iterations in a single load incrementCan be set to values in the interval 1 to 100Default settings
Desired minimum = 4 ; Desired maximum = 10
Soil with a low angle of friction Desired minimum = 3 ; Desired maximum = 7
Soil with a high angle of friction (and HS model) Desired minimum = 7 ; Desired maximum = 15 Maximum iterations = 75
Slide 57
Integration Algorithms: Arc-length ControlIncreased stability of numerical solution
Default for c-φ-reduction Computation of collapse load
Note: Arc-length control may lead to unintended unloading → restart without arc-length control