mn rti center 1 progress monitoring in reading: why, what, and how a module for pre-service and...
TRANSCRIPT
MN RtI Center1
Progress Monitoring in Reading:Why, What, and How
A module for pre-service and in-service professional development
MN RTI CenterAuthors: Lisa Habedank Stewart, PhD & Adam Christ, graduate
student Minnesota State University Moorhead
www.scred.k12.mn.us click on RTI Center
MN RtI Center2
MN RTI Center Training Modules
This module was developed with funding from the MN legislature It is part of a series of modules available from the MN RTI Center
for use in preservice and inservice training:
Module Title Authors
1. RTI Overview Kim Gibbons & Lisa Stewart
2. Measurement and RTI Overview Lisa Stewart
3. Curriculum Based Measurement and RTI Lisa Stewart
4. Universal Screening (Benchmarking): (Two parts)
What, Why and How
Using Screening Data
Lisa Stewart
5. Progress Monitoring: (Two parts)
What, Why and How
Using Progress Monitoring Data
Lisa Stewart & Adam Christ
6. Evidence-Based Practices Ann Casey
7. Problem Solving in RTI Kerry Bollman
8. Differentiated Instruction Peggy Ballard
9. Tiered Service Delivery and Instruction Wendy Robinson
10. Leadership and RTI Jane Thompson & Ann Casey
11. Family involvement and RTI Amy Reschly
12. Five Areas of Reading Kerry Bollman
13. Schoolwide Organization Kim Gibbons
MN RtI Center3
Overview
This module is Part 1 of 2 Part 1: Why, What, How to Progress Monitor
Why do it?
What do we mean by progress monitoring?
How do you do it?
Part 2: Using Progress Monitoring Data
MN RtI Center4
Is this student making progress?Adam Gr 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
week
wo
rds
corr
ect
pe
r m
in (
gra
de
leve
l pa
ssa
ge
)
wrc
errors
Repeated Reading 1:1, 20 min day Repeated Reading 1:1, 10 min 2xday
MN RtI Center5
Adapted from Logan City School District, 2002
Curriculum and Instruction Assessment
School Wide Organization &
Problem Solving Systems
(Teams, Process, etc)
Assessment: One of the Key Components in RTI
MN RtI Center6
Assessment and Response to Intervention (RTI)
A core feature of RTI is identifying a measurement system Screen large numbers of students
Identify students in need of additional intervention
Monitor students of concern more frequently 1 to 4x per month
Typically weekly Diagnostic testing used for instructional planning to
help target interventions as needed
MN RtI Center7
Screening Data and Progress Monitoring can be linked
The goal is to have a cohesive system.
If possible, use the same measures for both screening and progress monitoring (e.g, CBM).
Screen ALL students 3x per year (F, W, S)
Strategic Support and MonitoringStudents at Some Risk
Intensive Support & Monitoring for
Students at Extreme Risk
MN RtI Center8
Why Monitor Progress? When teachers USE progress monitoring
Students learn more! Teachers design better instructional
programs Teacher decision making
improves Students become more aware of
their performance Safer & Fleishman, 2005
MN RtI Center9
Why Monitor Progress?
“In God we trust…
All others must have data.”Dr. Stan Deno
MN RtI Center10
Why Monitor Progress?
We do NOT KNOW ahead of time whether an intervention will be successful for an individual student
Do they ASSUME in the hospital that your heart is working just fine after your bypass surgery? After all… the surgery works well for MOST patients…..
MN RtI CenterDRAFT May 27, 2009 11
To change what you are doing with a student if it is not working (formative assessment) so you are effective and efficient with your time and instruction
To help make decisions about instructional goals, materials, levels, and groups
To aid in communication with parents
To document progress for special education students as required for periodic and annual reviews
Credit: based on slide by Dr. Kim Gibbons, SCRED
Why Progress Monitor Frequently?
MN RtI Center12
Credit: SCRED
Change (and Keep Changing) if Instruction isn’t Working…
MN RtI Center13
You Can Also Use Monitoring Data to Celebrate Success!
MN RtI Center14
What is Progress Monitoring?
Standardized measures Reliable Valid
Tied to important educational outcomes
Given frequently (e.g., weekly) Simple, brief, efficient, and cheap Sensitive to growth over short periods of time
MN RtI Center
Measurement and RTI: Progress Monitoring
Reliability coefficients of r=.90+ Well documented treatment validity! Test and scores are very sensitive to increases or
decreases in student skills over time Evidence of what slope of progress (how much growth in a
day, week or a month) is typical under what conditions can greatly increase your ability to make decisions
VERY brief, easy to use, affordable, alternate forms, and results/reports are accessible immediately
MN RtI CenterDRAFT May 27, 2009 16
Standards for Scientifically Based Progress Monitoring
Reliability Quality of a Good Test
Validity Quality of a Good Test
Sufficient Number of Alternate Forms and of Equal Difficulty
Essential for Progress Monitoring
Evidence of Sensitivity to Intervention Effects Critical for Progress Monitoring
Benchmarks of Adequate Progress and Goal Setting
Critical for Progress Monitoring
Rates of Improvement are Specified Critical for Progress Monitoring
Evidence of Impact on Teacher Decision-Making Critical for Formative Evaluation
Evidence of Improved Instruction and Student Achievement
Gold Standard
National Center for Progress Monitoringwww.studentprogress.org
MN RtI Center17
Many tools that meet standards are
members of the Curriculum-Based
Measurement (CBM)“family.”
www.studentprogress.org click on “Tools”
MN RtI Center18
Buyer Beware!
Many tools may make claims about monitoring progress but…
Is it reliable and valid?
Is it tied to important educational outcomes?
Can it be given frequently (e.g., weekly)? Simple, brief, efficient, and cheap Sensitive to growth over short periods of time
MN RtI Center19
Short Term (Mastery) and Long Term
Progress Monitoring
Short TermMastery Monitoring
Test subskill mastery and individual lesson effectiveness
Ex: Q&A, worksheetsfollowing directions
unit tests, “hot” readsaccuracy, skills “checks”
CBE, cba
Long TermGeneral Outcome Measures
Test retention, generalization and progress
toward overall general outcome (reading)
Ex: CBM, DIBELS
MN RtI Center20
Both Mastery Monitoring and Long Term Progress Monitoring are Important
Sometimes mastering subskills doesn’t generalize to the general outcome or students don’t retain the information over time
For example: Melissa is very good at decoding letters and reading
individual words, but is not generalizing these skills to reading text with automaticity and comprehension.
Adam was really good at using his comprehension strategies and using those when they were working on these skills in class (showed mastery), but when they moved on to another unit he quit using the strategies.
MN RtI Center21
How Often Do I Need to Monitor Progress?
Informally we do this all the time! For small instructional adjustments (repeat
the lesson, how much help to give, etc.)
In a standardized way to make sure we are “on track” with this student?- depends on level of concern For students in reading who are behind already,
monitor progress toward generalized outcome 1 to 4x per month, ideally weekly
MN RtI Center22
How Do You Collect Frequent Progress Monitoring Data?
Which students?
What measures?
What materials?
How often?
Who collects the data? Where? When?
MN RtI Center23
Which students?
Students of concern
Below target
Getting “extra” intervention or help
Tier 2 or Tier 3 services
MN RtI Center24
What measures?
Web-based sources for information on measures as well as access to materials, web-based data management, etc. www.aimsweb.com dibels.uoregon.edu www.edcheckup.com
Disclaimer: More data management systems are being developed and marketed all the time to provide information, resources, and data management. This is just a sample of the types of web-based resources available. Be a critical consumer!
MN RtI Center25
What materials?
When possible, students are monitored using grade level materials
E.g., student reads a different grade level passage or “probe” each week
If this is not possible due to frustration “test down” and use the highest grade level of materials possible Periodically “check” how the student is doing on grade level
materials and move into grade level materials as soon as possible
MN RtI Center26
Example of Testing Down: Reading “Survey Level” Data for Gus, Gr 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
wor
ds c
orre
ct p
er m
inut
e
Note:
-Error rates high (5-15) in Gr 4,
-slightly lower (4-8) in Gr 3 & 2,
-and much lower (1-4) in Gr 1.
MN RtI Center27
What Material Should We Use…
To “instruct” Gus?
To monitor Gus’ progress?
MN RtI Center28
How Often Do We Monitor Progress?
Depends on the sensitivity of the measure and the level of concern we have about the student, but 1 to 4x per month typically
For CBM Oral Reading Fluency Weekly with 1 passage (this is most common) Every 3 weeks with 3 passages
MN RtI Center29
Who does it? When? Where?
Anyone trained in the procedures can collect progress monitoring data Classroom teachers, special education teachers,
Title teachers, aides, related services staff, adult volunteers
Be creative but careful
When and Where? At a time and place that will provide valid information Use common sense
MN RtI Center30
Sharing the Data
Just having progress monitoring data is not enough. You need to USE it.
Scheduled graph review dates
Grade level meetings
Problem solving meetings
MN RtI Center31
Using Progress Monitoring Data: Is this intervention working?
Adam Gr 4
0102030405060708090
100110120130140
w eek
wor
ds c
orre
ct p
er m
in (g
rade
leve
l pas
sage
)
w rc
errors
See MN RTI Center Module 2 for information on graphs, decision rules, etc
MN RtI Center32
Remember: Garbage IN…. Garbage OUT….
Make sure your data have integrity or they won’t be good fer nuthin… Training Integrity checks/refreshers Well chosen measures and
materials
MN RtI Center33
Avoid Common Mistakes
Don’t use the same passage/probe every week!
Have an organized system in place Progress monitoring schedule for students Preprinted passages/probes in a binder An easy way to graph and look at the data Scheduled time to share/look at the data
MN RtI Center34
Remember: When teachers USE progress monitoring
Students learn more! Teachers design better instructional
programs Teacher decision making
improves Students become more aware of
their performance Safer & Fleishman, 2005
MN RtI Center35
Web Resources Research Institute on Progress Monitoring
http://progressmonitoring.net/ Includes…
A Study Group Content Module with 15 sections on CBM including activities http://progressmonitoring.org/pdf/cbmMOD1.pdf
Progress Monitoring Leadership Team Content Module with 6 sections (e.g. measureable goals, decision making) including activities http://progressmonitoring.org/pdf/cbmMODldrshp.pdf
Handouts, videos, and power point presentations Technical reports of CBM measures
MN RtI CenterDRAFT May 27, 2009 36
Web Resources, Cont’d www.studentprogress.org
http://www.studentprogress.org/chart/chart.asp
http://www.rti4success.org/ click on Progress monitoring on right side
www.interventioncentral.org look for information on CBM, graphing, etc.
www.aimsweb.com, www.edcheckup.com, dibels.uoregon.edu Look for information about progress monitoring as well as
access to materials and graphing for progress monitoring
MN RtI Center37
Recommended Texts
Riley-Tillman & Burns. (2009). Evaluating Educational Interventions. Guilford Press.
MN RtI Center38
Print Resources available with this module
Safer & Fleishman. (2005). How student progress monitoring improves instruction, Educational Leadership, 62(5), 81-83.
Fuchs. Progress monitoring within a multi-level prevention system. Retrieved June 5, 2009, from RTI Action Network Web site: http://www.rtinetwork.org/Essential/Assessment/Progress/ar/MultilevelPrevention
Fuchs & Fuchs What is scientifically-based research on progress monitoring? From the National Center on Student Progress Monitoring (studentprogress.org). Retrieved June 14, 2009,
Jenkins, Hudson, & Hee Lee. Using CBM-Reading assessments to monitor progress. Retrieved June 5, 2009, from RTI Action Network Web site: http://www.rtinetwork.org/Essential/Assessment/Progress/ar/Using CBM/1
MN RtI Center39
Activity for Teachers or Practicum Students Obtain progress monitoring probes and graphs
Passages and graphing materials self-created or downloaded www.interventioncentral.org dibels.uoregon.edu
Sign up for an account with AIMSweb (instructor accounts and student accounts available) www.aimsweb.org
Practice administration and scoring Progress Monitor a “real” kid (ideally 2-4 kids of varying risk
levels monitored for at least 7-10 weeks) Graph, analyze, and use data
MN RtI CenterDRAFT May 27, 2009 40
Quiz
1.) What are at least four reasons why teachers should monitor progress?
2) What is the difference between mastery monitoring and frequency progress monitoring toward a general outcome?
3) How often should you monitor progress for students receiving extra help ?
MN RtI Center41
Quiz (Cont’d)
4.) When possible, students are monitored using… A.) above grade level materials. B.) grade level materials. C.) below grade level materials.
5.) Who can collect progress monitoring data?
MN RtI Center42
Quiz (Cont’d)
6.) To have integrity, your data collection must include what? A.) trained data collectors B.) integrity checks/refreshers C.) well chosen measures and materials D.) all of the above
MN RtI Center
Quiz (Cont’d)
7.) True or False? The most important use of frequent progress monitoring is to aid in communication with parents.
MN RtI Center
Note: The MN RTI Center does not endorse any particular product. Examples used are for instructional purposes only.
Special Thanks: Thank you to Dr. Ann Casey, director of the MN RTI Center, for
her leadership Thank you to Aimee Hochstein, Kristen Bouwman, and Nathan
Rowe, Minnesota State University Moorhead graduate students, for editing, writing quizzes, and enhancing the quality of these training materials