Mobility indicators for the evaluation of Hinterland-Accessibility

Suggested by:Kai Dahme, VBB GmbH

Why Mobility?

• Mobility as an important basis for economic development

• More and more people do not live where they work

• Good accessibility to Vorderland (job market) is a potential for Hinterland-Regions

Mobility-indicators

Nr. IndicatorsPP 2.1 Commuters HINTERLAND - Vorderland

PP 2.2 Owners of cars (Cars per 1.000 inhabitants)

PP 2.3 Accessibility of Vorderland for Hinterland population by car (travel time) and by public transport (travel time and frequency)

PP 2.4 Accessibility of regional centre for Hinterland population by car (travel time) and by public transport (travel time and frequency)

PP 2.5 Change of average covered distances since 1990 (change of mobility behaviour)

Travel time by car / public transport

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Public transport

Car

Prignitz

Perleberg

Neuruppin

Oranienburg

Beeskow

Lübben

Luckenwalde

Herzberg

Belzig

Rathenow

Havelland

Brandenburg/H

Potsdam

Teltow-Fläming

Elbe-Elster

Spree-Neiße

Oberspree-

wald-

Lausitz

Dahme-Spreewald

Oder-Spree

Frankfurt/Oder

Oberhavel

Berlin

Uckermark

Barnim

Märkisch-Oderland

Ostprignitz

-Ruppin

Locktow

Baitz

Potsdam-MIttelmark

Frequency[No. connections/day]

3

15

8

30

Travelling time [min]1206030

Locktow

Beitz

4B

3BLow mobility potential(low demand)

0 - 8

4CRegions with lowMobility potential

4AMobility potential upgradeable (time and frequency)

3AHigh mobility potentialfrequency enhancement

8 - 15

1DCommuter area(actions recommended)

1BCommuter area(actions possible)

15 - 30

2CLow mobility potential(time is critical)

2AHigh mobility potentialtime enhancement

1CCommuter area(actions possible)

1ACommuter area no action needed

> 30frequency (connections within 24 hours)

> 120 min60 - 120 min30 - 60 min0 - 30 min

travelling time

Mobility-matrix for public transport

Locktow

Typ 4 A: Mobility potential upgradeable

For daily commuting unsuitable