mode-s.ppt

39

Upload: dino-jukic

Post on 01-Jan-2016

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

s

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: mode-s.ppt
Page 2: mode-s.ppt

The Story of Mode S

6.933 - Fall 2000Emily Chang, Roger Hu, Danny Lai, Richard Li, Quincy Scott, Tina Tyan

Page 3: mode-s.ppt

Introduction

Mode S Design

Aftermath

Conclusion

Introduction

Background

Page 4: mode-s.ppt

The Project History

• Traces the history of Mode S (1968-1975), an air traffic control technology developed by Lincoln Labs

Page 5: mode-s.ppt

Our Focus

AviationCommunityInfluences

Mode SDesign

Decisions

Key Concern:Interoperability

• Theme: Successful technologies are not developed in isolation

• Key example: Interoperability with the existing system drove the design of Mode S

Page 6: mode-s.ppt

Our Focus

AviationCommunityInfluences

Mode SDesign

Decisions

Key Concern:Interoperability

• Theme: Successful technologies are not developed in isolation

• Key example: Interoperability with the existing system drove the design of Mode S

Page 7: mode-s.ppt

Our Focus

AviationCommunityInfluences

Mode SDesign

Decisions

Key Concern:Interoperability

• Theme: Successful technologies are not developed in isolation

• Key example: Interoperability with the existing system drove the design of Mode S

Page 8: mode-s.ppt

Our Focus

AviationCommunityInfluences

Mode SDesign

Decisions

Key Concern:Interoperability

• Theme: Successful technologies are not developed in isolation

• Key example: Interoperability with the existing system drove the design of Mode S

Page 9: mode-s.ppt

Scope of Research

• Lincoln Labs - interviewed researchers and project leaders, read over 40 technical reports

• FAA - interviewed current and past administrators• General Aviation - contacted AOPA

communications dept. and other spokespeople• Read Air Traffic Control history books, magazine

articles, and web sites

Page 10: mode-s.ppt

Background

Mode S Design

Aftermath

Conclusion

Background

Introduction

Page 11: mode-s.ppt

Early Air Traffic Control

“The current choking of the federal airways and traffic control systems…[was] forecast in detail...during the past decade. But nobody really did anything about it. ” - Robert Hotz, editor, Aviation Week (1968)

Page 12: mode-s.ppt

Addressing the Problem

• Newly-formed Department of Transportation (1967) wanted reassessment of Air Traffic Control

• Formed the Air Traffic Control Advisory Committee (1968)– decided old system, the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System

(ATCRBS) was inadequate– made several recommendations for a new system

“When new blood takes over, [the FAA]...seek[s] new rules and regulations, different licensing procedures, and heaped-on layers of government control.” - Max Karant, AOPA Pilot founding editor

Page 13: mode-s.ppt

Meanwhile...

• Herb Weiss, head of Lincoln Laboratory’s Radar Division, flew regularly between Boston and D.C.– Flights were often delayed, especially in bad weather– He pushed for funding to examine ways to improve air

traffic control (1968)

“I knock[ed] on the door of the FAA and kind of introduced myself.” - Herb Weiss, LL

Page 14: mode-s.ppt

Mounting Pressure

VietnamWar FAA

Budget CutsControllerOverwork

LL DefenseBudget Cuts

LL Interest inNon-Military

DoTForms

FAAReorganizes

Reassessmentof ATC

Developmentof New ATCTechnology

Page 15: mode-s.ppt

Combining Forces

Opportunity for Collaboration

LL Expertise in ATC(SAGE, Radar,

Communications)

ATCAC Researchand Recommendations

Page 16: mode-s.ppt

The LL ATC Group

• Small group (5-6) recruited from different parts of LL, led by Paul Drouilhet (1970)

• Charter: prove that a newsystem could be completelyinteroperable with existing ATC

• Initially, FAA provided littlefunding and a short timeframe

Page 17: mode-s.ppt

Why Interoperability?

• Hard to achieve 100% penetration at once• Ground stations also take time to deploy• Every aircraft in an airspace needs to be tracked• Have to make sure that a hybrid system will

allow this to happen

“With air traffic control technology, there is no instantaneous reset.” - Jonathan Bernays, LL

Page 18: mode-s.ppt

Super Beacon

• FAA and LL started theDiscrete Address BeaconSystem (DABS) project,later renamed Mode S

• Enable two way ground-airdata transmission

• S = Select: Uses discreteaddressing to interrogatejust one aircraft

Mode S

Page 19: mode-s.ppt

Mode S DesignMode S Design

Aftermath

Conclusion

Background

Introduction

Page 20: mode-s.ppt

The Players

• MIT Lincoln Laboratory (Lincoln Labs)• Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)• General Aviation community

– Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA)• Other parties: commercial and cargo airliners,

military, transponder companies

Page 21: mode-s.ppt

Overview

interrogation

reply

Page 22: mode-s.ppt

Mode S

Page 23: mode-s.ppt

Interoperability Issues

• Transparency: Mode S must not break existing systems• Backwards-compatibility: Existing systems must still see

Mode S equipped planes

existinggroundstation

other aircraft

Mode Sgroundstation

new signal

existing signal

Mode S equipped

Page 24: mode-s.ppt

Frequency

• New frequency: difficult to allocate• Same frequency as old system (1030/1090

MHz): interoperable, but may cause interference

“The neatest technical solution would have been to put it on its own [frequency] band.” - Paul Drouilhet, LL

UHF300 MHz 3000 MHz1030 MHz 1090 MHz

VHF SHF

Page 25: mode-s.ppt

Sharing Frequencies

• Find an “invisible” signal– experiment with different signal characteristics

• Interoperability: both systems share the same channel without causing problems to each other

1030(interrogation)

1090(reply)

1000 1120

MHz

Page 26: mode-s.ppt

Transponders

• Flaw in FAA National Standard:doesn’t specify what ATCRBStransponders should not do:– 549 transponders on the market– Each had unique behavior

“There seemed to be a very strong correlation between cost and consistency of the transponder....the cheaper [ones] were all over the place....'' - George Colby, LL

Page 27: mode-s.ppt

The Hack

- Existing ATCRBS transponders used sidelobe suppression

side lobegroundstation

aircraft 1

P1 main

lobe

aircraft 3

aircraft 2

INTERFERENCE!!!

Page 28: mode-s.ppt

P2

The Hack

- Existing ATCRBS transponders used sidelobe suppression

P1 main

lobe

side lobegroundstation

aircraft 1

aircraft 2

aircraft 3

P1 P2A2

P2P1A1

Page 29: mode-s.ppt

Hacking the Hack

- Purposely send a small P1 and large P2- “Disables” ATCRBS transponders- Use the time to cram in Mode S data blocks- Limited number of bits can be sent in this window

P1 P2 Mode S data block

35 microseconds

Page 30: mode-s.ppt

Mode S Design

INTEROPERABILITY

FrequencyChoice

SignalDesign

Transponder &Sensor Design

Page 31: mode-s.ppt

Aftermath

Mode S Design

Aftermath

Conclusion

Background

Introduction

Page 32: mode-s.ppt

Slow Adoption

• Lincoln Labs spec delivered to FAA in 1975, first commercial transponder manufactured in 1980

• FAA slow to install Mode S ground stations, but still tries to mandate it being used

“The spec we wrote went to the FAA in 1975…they went to study it…we call [this] the handholding period, where a couple individuals stayed onboard [to advise the FAA]...” - Thomas Goblick, LL

Page 33: mode-s.ppt

What Changed Things

• Mid-air collision in 1986• Congress passes a law mandating that all

commercial aircraft be equipped with a Traffic Collision and Avoidance System (TCAS) by 1993– TCAS uses Mode S– TCAS is now an international standard

• Mode S technology is now commercially available

Page 34: mode-s.ppt

Mode S Today

• 108 of the U.S.’s busiest airports have Mode S ground stations

• Majority of aircraft landing at these airports have Mode S transponders

• Without Mode S, the 1030/1090 Mhz band would be completely overloaded

• Mode S used in TCAS and many other applications

Page 35: mode-s.ppt

ConclusionConclusion

Mode S Design

Aftermath

Background

Introduction

Page 36: mode-s.ppt

What We Learned

• It’s all about INTEROPERABILITY!• Aviation community is conservative

– Interoperability allows long transition periods– Interoperability allows a system that everyone can use,

since there won’t be 100% compliance• Interoperability had an effect on almost every

design decision

Page 37: mode-s.ppt

The Big Picture

Successful technologies are not developed in isolation.

AviationCommunityInfluences

Mode SDesign

Decisions

Key Concern:Interoperability

Page 38: mode-s.ppt

Comments?

Questions?

Page 39: mode-s.ppt