model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from coulomb excitation...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Model independent determination of quadrupole deformationparameters from Coulomb excitation measurements
XVIIth Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny 2010, September 25th
** Symmetry and symmetry breaking in nuclear physics **
Julian Srebrny( Heavy Ion Laboratory, University of Warsaw)
![Page 2: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OUTLINE
• Introduction: K. Kumar-idea, D. Cline – the method development and realisation
• Formulae derivation, expectation value of
quadrupole deformation Q and triaxiality cos3δ
• How does it really work - 104Ru example.
Nothing is easy : vibrational energy but shapes?
• Typical stiff axially symmetric rotor 168Er
• Transitional nuclei and important role of triaxiality 186-192Os and 194Pt
• Low lying 0+ states - 72-76 Ge and 96-100Mo
• Higher order invariants - degree of stiffness or softness in Q or cos3δ
• SUMMARY: The information about charge deformation.
The quality of collective quadrupole model descriptions.
Nuclear microscope –T. Czosnyka.
![Page 3: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A result of Coulomb excitation experiment is the set of electromagnetic matrix elements. It can be 20 ÷ 60 ME for stable beam experiments. mainly E2 collective transitional and diagonal matrix elements:
< f II E2 II i > B(E2; i → f ) < i II E2 II i > spectroscopic quadrupole moment very often signs can be determined, not only absolute values
Comparing the list of experimental E2 matrix elements with model values exhibits neither the uniqueness nor the sensitivity of the data to the collective model parameters.
Quadrupole collectivity produces strong correlations of the E2 matrix elements and the number of significant collective variables is much lower than the number of matrix elements.
The information about charge deformation parameters can be obtained using rotationally invariant products of the quadrupole operators that relate the reduced E2 matrix elements with the quadrupole deformation parameters
K. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 249.D. Cline, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 36 (1986) 683.
![Page 4: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• The two basic quadrupole invariants are formed of the quadrupole operator tensorM(E2) in the following way
- where [··· × ···]L stands for the vector coupling to angular momentum L.
- invariants are denoted here up to coefficients as Q2 and Q3 cos 3δ, in order to have a correspondence with collective coordinates, < Q2 > is an overall quadrupole deformation parameter < cos 3δ > is a triaxiality parameter
- since the components of M(E2,µ) with different µ’s commute with each other the expectation values of the E2 invariants can be related to the reduced E2 matrix elements by making intermediate state expansions:
Σ I R > < R I = 1
![Page 5: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
since the components of M (E2,µ) with different µ’s commute with each otherthe expectation values of the E2 invariants can be related to the reduced matrix elements by making intermediate state expansions:
- S denotes state S and at the same time the spin of state S alone; R and T denotes intermediate states and their spins;
- having the experimental values of the reduced E2 matrix elements, the expectation values of the basic quadrupole invariants <S|Q2|S> and <S|Q3cos3δ IS> for a given state S can be extracted from the experimental data.
![Page 6: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Nuclear Physics A 766 (2006) 25–51
J. Srebrny, T. Czosnyka, Ch. Droste, S.G. Rohozinski,L. Próchniak, K. Zajac, K. Pomorski,
D. Cline, C.Y. Wu, A. Bäcklin, L. Hasselgren , R.M. Diamond , D. Habs, H.J. Körner,
F.S. Stephens, C. Baktash, R.P. Kostecki
4 phonon multiplet
3 phonon
2 phonon
1 phonon
![Page 7: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
β ≈ 0.28 ≈ 0.26 ≈ 0.21
similar behaviour 106-110
Pd , 128
Xe
only 114
Cd looks like real vibrator
approximation: < Q3
cos3δ > = < Q2 >3/2
< cos3δ >
![Page 9: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
168Er the centre of the rare earth region
rigid axially symmetric rotor E(2+
) = 80 keV
β ≈ 0.33 , ≈ 9°
similar results for 182,184
W and 174-178
Hf
![Page 10: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
prolate – oblate transitional nuclei Z= 76( Os), 78(Pt)
![Page 11: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Bogumiła Basaj
triaxial rotor, stable quadrupole deformation
and triaxiality – δ ≈ 20°
![Page 12: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Maximal triaxiality: close to 30°
![Page 13: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
by adding 2 protons ( 192
Os – 194
Pt) deformation
has jumped from prolate to oblate
![Page 14: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
prolate – oblate transitional nuclei Z= 76( Os), 78(Pt)
![Page 15: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
very low second 0+
, close to first 2+
72Ge: 0+(691 keV), 2+(834 keV)
in Ge: ground state - deformed and triaxial
excited state - spherical
in Mo: complicated picture,
see review talk of Katarzyna Wrzosek
![Page 16: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The new generation of RIA: few order increase of intensity will allow on
comprehensive study of many new nuclei
The only results from radioactive beam experiments( SPIRAL): 74,76
Kr.
E. CLEMENT et al. 02 : β ≈ 0.6 ≈ 40°
![Page 17: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Higher order invariants allow to measure a softness of Q 2
and cos3δ
the need of longer excitation pass:
3 intermediate states for σ( Q2) and 5 intermediate states for σ(cos3δ)
![Page 18: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SUMMARY
1. Model independent analysis of Coulomb Excitation experiment
(GOSIA) combined with non energy weighted Sum Rules
- powerful tool for quadrupole deformation parameters determination
2. Summation over double, triple or higher products of E2 matrix elements
allowed to measure in model independent way expectation values of
quadrupole deformation parameters.
3. In the future by more complicated excitation paths degree of softness
or stiffness in particular state
4. Nowadays possible mainly for stable nuclei. We got information
for more than 20 cases, including transitional nuclei.
5. Tools are ready for RIA of the new generation
6. Nuclear microscope- Tomasz Czosnyka
![Page 19: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
main authors
D. Cline, T. Czosnyka, C.Y.Wu B. Kotlinski, R. W. Ibbotson, J.S NSRL Rochester
L. Hasselgren, A. Backlin, C. Fahlander, L.-E. Svensson, A. Kavka TAL Uppsala
P. J. Napiorkowski, M. Zielinska, K. Wrzosek- Lipska, K. Hadynska-Klek, J.S. HIL Warsaw
D. Diamond, F. Stephens LBL Berkeley
C. Baktash, BNL Brookhaven
E. Clement GANIL
S. G. Rohozinski UW, L. Prochniak UMCS
![Page 20: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
![Page 21: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
≈ 0.16
![Page 22: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Rochester-Warsaw-Uppsala-Berkeley-…
![Page 29: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Nuclear Physics A 766 (2006) 25–51J. Srebrny, T. Czosnyka, Ch. Droste, S.G. Rohozinski,L. Próchniak, K. Zajac, K. Pomorski, D. Cline, C.Y. Wu,A. Bäcklin, L. Hasselgren , R.M. Diamond , D. Habs,H.J. Körner, F.S. Stephens, C. Baktash, R.P. Kostecki
<f II E2 II i > B(E2; i→f )
<i II E2 II i > spectroscopic quadrupole moment
![Page 31: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
98
Mo
Magda Zielińska PhD Thesis, Warsaw University 2005
Nucl. Phys. A712 (2002) 3
![Page 33: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
0.28
0.01
0.29 ± 0.02------------------------------------
0.10
0.09
0.06
0.25 ± 0.03
![Page 34: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
-0.03
0.02
-0.01 ± 0.01----------------------------------------------------------------
0.11
-0.04
0.02
0.09 ± 0.03
![Page 35: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Contribution of various matrix elements to the final result
for < 22+|Q2| 22
+ > invariant in 104Ru
the component contribution to the invariant [e2b2]
<22+ II E2 II 2g+> <2g+ II E2 II 22
+> 0.113
<22+ II E2 II 31
+ > < 31+II E2 II 22
+> 0.298
<22+ II E2 II 42
+ > < 42+ II E2 II 22
+> 0.251
<22+ II E2 II 22
+ > < 22+ II E2 II 22
+> 0.077
total of 4 contributions = 0.739
all contributions = 0.76(8)
![Page 36: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
SUMMARY
● thanks to GOSIA and model independent analysis we got sets of 20-50 E2 matrix elements for many transitional nuclei
● thanks to the Sum Rules we experimentally deducedthe shapes of many nuclei in their ground and excited states in a model independent way:
nuclear microscope (de Broglie wavelength 0.5 fm much smaller than radius of nucleus)
● stringent test of sophisticated microscopic collective Q + P models, otherwise impossible
![Page 39: Model independent determination of quadrupole deformation parameters from Coulomb excitation measurements XVII th Nuclear Physics Workshop, Kazimierz Dolny](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061305/55141fe2550346ec488b5799/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Vdef - the quadrupole deformation potential, the dynamical variables: β, γ - two Bohr shape deformation parameters, Ω - three Euler angles,Q + P microscopic calculations of potential and all the inertial functions, starting from the Nilsson model
Nuclear Physics A 766 (2006) 25–51J. Srebrny, T. Czosnyka, Ch. Droste, S.G. Rohozinski,L. Próchniak, K. Zajac, K. Pomorski, D. Cline, C.Y. Wu,A. Bäcklin, L. Hasselgren , R.M. Diamond , D. Habs,H.J. Körner, F.S. Stephens, C. Baktash, R.P. Kostecki
the nuclear spectroscopy
- physics of many body quantum system with finite fermions number
quantum dots, molecular clusters, ......, ....., .....