modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment an application of the westwide pine beetle...

45
Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew McMahan 1 Alan Ager 2 , Helen Maffei 3 , Eric L Smith 4 1 Systems Analyst, ITX, Inc., Ft. Collins 2 Operations Research Analyst, PNW Research Station 3 Forest Pathologist, Deschutes National Forest, Bend 4 Program Manager, Quantitative Analysis, FHTET, Ft Collins

Upload: johnathan-golden

Post on 17-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment

An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the

Deschutes National Forest

Andrew McMahan1

Alan Ager2, Helen Maffei3, Eric L Smith4

1 Systems Analyst, ITX, Inc., Ft. Collins2 Operations Research Analyst, PNW Research Station3 Forest Pathologist, Deschutes National Forest, Bend4 Program Manager, Quantitative Analysis, FHTET, Ft Collins

Page 2: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Primary Objective

• Simulate effects of bark beetles on stands in context of landscape-scale fuel mgmt and wildlife habitat mgmt projects– How might beetle dynamics respond to fuel

treatments?– How might beetle dynamics affect fuel

dynamics (spatially and temporally)?

Page 3: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Secondary Objectives

• Simulate beetle “sanitation” concurrent with simulated thinning treatments

• Consider dwarf mistletoe effects on beetle dynamics (partially done)

• Consider fire effects on bark beetle dynamics (not done)– simulate effects of live, fire-scorched trees on

stand attractiveness to beetles

Page 4: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Scenario design• With & without thinning treatment• With & without beetles

NoTRT-bNoTRT+BTRT-bTRT+B

• Treatments include WWPBM “sanitation”– Sanitation removes dead, beetle-infested

trees and their beetles

• Treatments are SDI-based thins from below (thinning by point)

Page 5: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Simulation Details

• SDIMAX for pines set to 429 (Cochran)

• If BSDI > 236 (55% of 429),

and year=2003, then...

• SetPThin to target SDI=150 (from below)

• Favor retention of pines and DF

• Run PPE for 7 3-yr cycles (2000-2021)

Page 6: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

WWPB Model details

• Beetles (BKP) initialized into stands containing “significant” amounts of host in an amount = 1% of host BA

• “Severe” bark beetle outbreak initiated in simulation year=2005 for 5 years

Page 7: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Oregon

Deschutes National Forest

Five Buttes Analysis Area

Page 8: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 9: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Davis Fire (2003)

Page 10: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 11: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Mixed Conifer PAGs

Page 12: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 13: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

NoTRT-b All NoTRT+B All

TRT-b All TRT+B All

Average stand Basal Area (sq ft / acre)

Green=No Beetles

Red=with beetles

Dashed=treated

Page 14: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

2

4

6

8

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020B

AK

/ac

re

TRT other

TRT MC

NOTRT other

NOTRT MC

Basal area beetle-killed (BAK; sq ft / acre) in Mixed Conifer (MC) PAG and “Other” PAGs

Page 15: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

2

4

6

8

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020B

AK

/ac

re

NOTRT other NOTRT MC

Basal area beetle-killed (BAK) No Treatment (NoTRT) scenario

Mixed Conifer (MC) and “other” PAGs

Page 16: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

2

4

6

8

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020B

AK

/ac

re

TRT other TRT MC

Basal area beetle-killed (BAK) Thinned (TRT) scenario

Mixed Conifer (MC) and “other” PAGs

Page 17: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

2

4

6

8

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020B

AK

/ac

re

TRT MC NOTRT MC

Basal area beetle-killed (BAK) Mixed Conifer (MC) PAG

Both TRT & NoTRT scenarios

Page 18: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

2

4

6

8

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020B

AK

/ac

re

TRT other NOTRT other

Basal area beetle-killed (BAK) “Other” PAGs

Both TRT & NoTRT scenarios

Page 19: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 20: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 21: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 22: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Orange: experience greater simulated beetle mortalityafter TRTGreens & blue: “protected”

Page 23: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

NoTrt+B NoTrt-b

TRT+B TRT-b

Potential Volume Mortality (Severe Fire)

(Millions of Cu Ft)

Page 24: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

10

20

30

40

50

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020

Th

ou

sa

nd

s o

f A

cre

s

NoTrt-b NoTrt+B

Trt-b Trt+B

Acres Active Crown Fire Potential

Page 25: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Polygons with Active Crown Fire Potential in 2020Landscapes Without Treatments Without Beetles (ORANGE) on top ofWith Beetles (RED)

Red: stands classed as“Active” Crown Fireif beetle outbreak

Page 26: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Polygons with Active Crown Fire Potential in 2020Landscapes With Treatments Without Beetles (ORANGE) on top ofWith Beetles (RED)

Red: stands classed as“Active” Crown Fireif beetle outbreak

Page 27: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Surface Fuels2020Thinned landscapeNo Beetles

Page 28: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Surface Fuels2020Thinned landscapeWith Beetles

Page 29: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Orange Blue:Increase in surface fuelsdue to beetles

Treated Landscape 2018

Page 30: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Orange Blue:Increase in surface fuelsdue to beetles

Untreated Landscape 2018

Page 31: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Orange Blue:Decrease in standing fuelsdue to beetles

Untreated Landscape 2018

Page 32: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Orange Blue:Decrease in standing fuelsdue to beetles

Treated Landscape 2018

Page 33: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 34: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 35: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew
Page 36: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Mixed Conifer Forest types

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000N

OT

RT

-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

Acr

es

OM

OS

YM

UR

SE

SI

Treatment Effect Beetle Effects

Page 37: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

"Other" forest types

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

NO

TR

T-b

NO

TR

T+

B

TR

T-b

TR

T+

B

ac

res

OM

OS

YM

UR

SE

SI

Growth Effects Beetle Effects

Page 38: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Discussion: BKP migration

• Simulated beetles efficiently find remaining host

• How realistically does the WWPBM simulate beetle migration?– Should in-flight beetle mortality algorithms be

adjusted to account for distance traveled?

Page 39: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Orange: experience greater simulated beetle mortalityafter TRTGreens & blue: “protected”

Page 40: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Discussion: SDIMAX

• Although FVS users may explicitly enter site-specific SDIMAX values, they can be overwritten by FVS when input treelists “disagree”

• Should FVS handle SDIMAX readjustments differently? How?

Page 41: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Summary• WWPB Model can be used in landscape

analyses to simulate effects of beetles on landscape fuel dynamics

• WWPB Model is sensitive to changes in host availability

• ArcFuels—w/ FVS-DB—streamlines landscape-scale FVS simulation-building

• ArcFuels—w/ FVS-DB—simplifies mapping FVS output data

Page 42: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

Acknowledgements

Western Wildland Threat Assessment CenterPrineville

Jim StoneDana Simon

Lance David, ITX, Inc (FHTET)

Gary Dixon, FMSC

Frank Krist, FHTET

Vern Thomas, ITX, Inc. (FHTET)

Page 43: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

END

Page 44: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

0

5

10

15

20

25

2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

BK

PNOTRT

TRT(wSAN)

SAN_Only(NoTRT)

TRT (withoutSAN)

Page 45: Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew

In all cases BAHost must be > 50 AND BA total > 100 sq ft

Case 1: all stands that are MIXED CONIFER ("MC"), and meet above criteriaCase 2: For those that are NOT classed as mixed conifer,they must either:a) have > 100 tpa LPP > 9"dbh, ORb) have > 50% host AND >50% of the host must be PP