modeling the thermal structure of plate boundaries with comsol multiphysics (femlab) laurent g.j....

Download Modeling the thermal structure of plate boundaries with COMSOL Multiphysics (FEMLAB) Laurent G.J. Montési, Mark D. Behn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: lester-rose

Post on 18-Jan-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Ultraslow and Oblique Ridges Mid-Atlantic Ridge Mohns Ridge Reykjanes Ridge Terceira Rift Lena Trough Knipovich Ridge Manus ETZ Gakkel ridge SouthWest Indian Ridge (SWIR) 15-40° 40° Obliquity

TRANSCRIPT

Modeling the thermal structure of plate boundaries with COMSOL Multiphysics (FEMLAB) Laurent G.J. Montsi, Mark D. Behn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Jennifer L. Barry Swarthmore College Outline Thermal structures of ultraslow and Oblique Mid-Ocean Ridges Montsi, Behn, and Barry (2005, 2006) Formation of the Denali volcanic gap Rondenay, Abers, and Montsi (2006) Gravity anomalies at ridge-transform intersections Gregg, Lin, Behn, and Montsi (2006) All these projects use COMSOL Multiphysics, the code formerly known as FEMLAB All could use addition of melt migration Ultraslow and Oblique Ridges Mid-Atlantic Ridge Mohns Ridge Reykjanes Ridge Terceira Rift Lena Trough Knipovich Ridge Manus ETZ Gakkel ridge SouthWest Indian Ridge (SWIR) 15-40 40 Obliquity MAR- and SWIR type Transition to ultraslow spreading for V E 25km Oblique Supersegment: 9-16E Oblique supersegment Obliquity up to 60 No en-chelon ridges Ridge lined by mantle blocks Punctual volcanic center, separated by 80+km Dick, Lin, and Schouten, 2003 Amagmatic segments Dredges on oblique segment return mostly peridotite Geophysical evidence MBA low indicate thick crust Magnetization indicates volcanism Crustal bluidup only at volcanic centers Joseph Mayes Seamount Narrowgate Segment Focusing of enriched melts Standish, 2005 SWIR 09-16E area 500x700x100 km 3 area, 1.6 Million degrees of freedom: requires 12 Gb RAM, 24+ hours Melt body at 09-16 Melt anomaly associated with Joseph Mayes Seamount SWIR 54-57 E area 445x700x100 km 3 area, 1.2 Million degrees of freedom: requires 10.5 Gb RAM, 18+ hours Melt body at 54-57 Segmentation reflected in magma body Temperature and melting at 54-57E Temperature and melting at 09-16E Segment-to-segment variations OK with 2D analysis, but no segment is truly 2D Relief at the base of the lithosphere focuses melt to orthogonal segments Melt focusing at the base of the lithosphere Montsi, Kelemen and Spiegelman (still) in preparation Include inclined crystallization front Original idea by Sparks and Parmentier, 1991 Effect of melt- rock reaction, proposity- dependent viscosity Melt trajectory at an oblique segment Generic oblique segment Follows 1200 isotherm Focusing at outside corner Offset of melt collection zone and imposed ridge axis Barry et al., 2005 Melt Transport at Mid-Ocean Ridges Distributed melting in upwelling mantle Dissolution channels after corner Migrating melt ponds at the base of the thermal boundary layer Denali volcanic gap Rondenay, Abers, and Montsi, 2006 Thermal structure Rondenay, Abers, and Montsi, 2006 Temperature-dependent viscosity Focusing at the base of the lithosphere towards the arc Corner flow enhances heat flow takes ~100Ma to erode llithosphere No hot pinch zone in Denali gap because of Yakutat underplating What about COMSOL Multiphysics? The code formerly known as FEMLAB Pro: Easy to use Predefined applications (fluid, solids, heat, steady-state, transient, poroelasticity, ALE mode) GUI and scripting modes Custom PDEs, ODEs Easily coupled with MATLAB Good performance at subduction benchmark (Mark Behn) Cons: Restricted development No parallelization (SMM in next version), use 64 bits for large models Limited quad meshes, adaptative remeshing, dislocations Commercial: need to pay, difficult to influence development Thank You