modelling water dimer band intensities and spectra matt barber jonathan tennyson university college...

15
Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 [email protected]

Upload: mary-davies

Post on 28-Mar-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Modelling Water Dimer BandIntensities and Spectra

Matt Barber

Jonathan Tennyson

University College London

10th February 2011

[email protected]

Page 2: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Band Intensities

• Calculated using the “forbidden” J=0-0 transition.• Water dimer is too complicated for full ro-

vibrational modelling.• However, we can model vibrations of monomers

within dimer and simulate additional rotational structure.

• Need to use 1992 version of DVR– Band models subsequently superseded– Calculate monomer bands from recent line lists

Page 3: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Band Intensities

1.00E-025

1.00E-024

1.00E-023

1.00E-022

1.00E-021

1.00E-020

1.00E-019

1.00E-018

1.00E-017

1.00E-016

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

Frequency

Inte

nsity HITRAN

BT2

DIPJ0

Page 4: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Dimer band intensities

• Calculate from (perturbed) monomer vibrational wavefunctions

• Requires Eckart embedding of axis frame• Use HBB 12 D dipole moment surface (DMS)

corrected with accurate monomer DMS CVR: L. Lodi et al, J Chem Phys., 128, 044304 (2008)

Issues:• PES used to generate monomer wavefunctions• Cut through 12 D DMS used

Page 5: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

1500 2500 3500 4500 5500 6500 7500 8500 9500 10500 11500

1.00E-028

1.00E-026

1.00E-024

1.00E-022

1.00E-020

1.00E-018

1.00E-016

Donor (equilibr ium)

A c c eptor(equilibr ium)

Monomer

Page 6: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Perturbing the dimer configuration

• Many possible configurations• Transition intensities vary considerably from small

changes in geometry• Equilibrium may not be best choice• Pick to strengthen donor bound stretch

Page 7: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

1500 2500 3500 4500 5500 6500 7500 8500 9500 10500 11500

1.00E-028

1.00E-026

1.00E-024

1.00E-022

1.00E-020

1.00E-018

1.00E-016

Donor (per turbed)

A c c eptor (per turbed)

Monomer

Page 8: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Estimating transition frequencies

Band centre from monomer DVR3D calculation

Blue/red shift from calculation on perturbed PES

Vibrational fine structure from dimer dimer transitions

Rotational structure simulated by overlaid Lorentzian

Page 9: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Partition function and equlibrium constant

• 800 vibrational energy levels• J up to 5 calculated, extrapolated up to 50

• Dissociation energy?

• Equilibrium constant at room temperature:– Around 0.03 to 0.05 for bound states– Possibly up to 0.08 for metastable

Page 10: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Simulate spectra at “296 K”

• Assume 0.045 equilibrium constant for typical atmospheric conditions• Rotational band profile 30 cm-1 HWHM• Vibrational fine structure mostly hidden beneath rotational structure

But: • Vibrational substructure still only for low T

(8 J=0 states per symmetry)• Possible contribution from metastable dimers

Page 11: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 19000.00E+000

1.00E-021

2.00E-021

3.00E-021

4.00E-021

5.00E-021

6.00E-021

7.00E-021

8.00E-021

9.00E-021

UCL

Salmi

MTCKD-1.1, 293K

WD(S&K-2003)

RAL-2007/295K/

Page 12: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk
Page 13: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk
Page 14: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk
Page 15: Modelling Water Dimer Band Intensities and Spectra Matt Barber Jonathan Tennyson University College London 10 th February 2011 matt@theory.phys.ucl.ac.uk

Further Work

• Preliminary spectra for up to 10,000 cm-1 produced.– Band profile comparisons show some encouraging

signs.– Effects of the sampling of the potential being

investigated.

• Need all states up to dissociation for RT spectra– Only 8 states per symmetry here– It is a challenge for a much higher number of states

• Improved band origins