modernisation of signalling system (2001/lv/16/p/pt/006) stage 1
DESCRIPTION
Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1. Intermediate Body: Ministry of Transport Employer: Latvian Railway - LDZ Contractor: Consortium Thales Rail Signalling Solution Gmbh and Thales Rail Signalling Solution Baltics Engineer: Systra. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006)
Stage 1
• Intermediate Body: Ministry of Transport• Employer: Latvian Railway - LDZ• Contractor: Consortium Thales Rail
Signalling Solution Gmbh and Thales Rail Signalling Solution Baltics
• Engineer: Systra
![Page 2: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1. General information of contract:
• Type of project: Plant and Design-Build (FIDIC)• Commencement date: 10.01.2005• Contract price: 47.597.197 EURO• Scope of works (7 stages):
– interlocking systems: 32 stations– Lineblock system, including cable laying: 350 km– Level Crossing systems: 83– Reconstruction of 10 kV power supply line: 182 km– 2 CTC central offices– Point heating system: 21 stations– Refurbishment or installation of buildings (depends on situation):
32 stations• Time for completion:
– Initial: 09.01.2009– Adjusted in Addendum No.3: 31.12.2009
![Page 3: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2. Payments• Basis for payment:
– FIDIC Sub-Clauses 14.2, 14.4, Particular Conditions: BPQPW– Performance of a milestone (FAT, Delivery, Installation, Testing,
Commissioning) for any of 12 types of equipment– Invoice reaching 1% of contract Price.
• Payments made:– Advance payment: 4759719,7 EUR (29.06.2005)– Interim payments:
• 1-st: 2 863 610,29 EUR (Cable FAT) (27.12.2006/30.07.2007)• 2-nd: 897 499,41 EUR (Cable FAT and delivery) (30.07.2007)• 3-d: 484 215,21 EUR (Cable FAT and delivery) (30.07.2007)• 4-th: 2 082 213,5 EUR (FAT of interlocking, CTC hardware, UPS;
cable delivery) (21.12.2007)– Totally paid: 11 087 258,11 EUR (23,3 %)
• Next payments:– Probably for equipment/cable delivery– No more reasons: no further FAT performed, no completed installation,
no test is foreseen, no commissioning planning soon
![Page 4: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
3. Cumulative Contractor “Completed Task" Performance
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Jan.
05
Mar
.05
Mai.
05
Jūl.0
5
Sep.0
5
Nov.0
5
Jan.
06
Mar
.06
Mai.
06
Jūl.0
6
Sep.0
6
Nov.0
6
Jan.
07
Mar
.07
Mai.
07
Jūl.0
7
Sep.0
7
Nov.0
7
Jan.
08
Mar
.08
Mai.
08
Jūl.0
8
Sep.0
8
Nov.0
8
Jan.
09
Mar
.09
Mai.
09
Jūl.0
9
Sep.0
9
Nov.0
9
Date
Qu
an
tity
of
Ta
sk
s
Planned to be Completed
Actually Completed Work Programme of 24.08.2007
Work Programme of 05.05.2006
![Page 5: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
4. On-going Contractor Task Performance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Septe
mbe
r 200
6
Octobe
r 200
6
Novem
ber 2
006
Decem
ber 2
006
Janu
ary 2
007
Febru
ary 2
007
Mar
ch 2
007
April 2
007
May
200
7
June
200
7
July
2007
Augus
t 200
7
Septe
mbe
r 200
7
Octobe
r 200
7
Novem
ber 2
007
Decem
ber 2
007
Janu
ary 2
008
Febru
ary 2
008
Date
Nu
mb
er
of
Ta
sk
s Tasks which did not Progress from Previous Month
Tasks which progressed from Previous Month
Revised Work Programme
![Page 6: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
5. Delays in project implementation*• Submission of FRS documents for approval: up to 180
days• Submission of Subsystem Technical Specifications for
approval: up to 200 days• Submission of detailed design for approval:
– Construction part: • Stage 1: up to 170 days• Stage 2: up to 170 days• Stage 3: up to 45 days
– Technological part:• Stage 1: up to 160 days• Stage 2: up to 170 days• Stage 3: up to 45 days
• Construction activity: – Stage 1: up to 180 days– Stage 2: to be started April, 2008, not ready.
* Based on the Detailed Work Programme, document 3CR 74510 0001 UHAFA, Edition 05, dated 24.08.2007
![Page 7: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
6. Reason for delays• Insufficiency of Contractor’s human
resources (quality and quantity)
7. Consequences of current delays• Probable delay of project completion
• Application of conditional Delay Damages (currently about 157.200 EUR)
• Probable delay of project Stage 2 (Contractor: Consortium Bombardier/Belam Riga): CTC Jelgava, CTC Daugavpils
![Page 8: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8. Measures already taken
• Contract execution extended for 1 year (Addendum No.3)
• Discussions during monthly progress meetings• High level management meeting with
involvement of president of Thales Rail Signalling Solutions, held on 02.02.2008
• “Hot” management meetings with LDZ Technical Management Director and Contractor – weekly.
![Page 9: Modernisation of signalling system (2001/LV/16/P/PT/006) Stage 1](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082611/56812a93550346895d8e458b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9. Measures to be taken (Contractor)
• Involve more appropriate experienced experts for respective design areas
• Complete remaining technical solutions (CTC, Buildings/containers, Level Crossings, Diesel generators, 10 kV line, etc.)
• Issue documentation for approval without further delays
• Hire many more subcontractors, especially for performance of cable laying activities in parallel