modernizing the mix - info. · pdf filemodernizing the mix: transforming marketing through...
TRANSCRIPT
© DataXu, Inc.ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction And Key Findings 1
2. Report Methodology 3
3. The Rise Of The Marketing Technologist 4
4. The Positives (And Pitfalls) Of Martech And Adtech 10
5. Solving The Marketing ROI Measurement Challenge 16
6. Planned 2017 Marketing Technology Investments 22
7. Trends In Martech And Adtech Management 24
8. Conclusion 33
© DataXu, Inc. 1
1. Introduction And Key FindingsMarketing roles and functions evolve over time
as consumer trends, new digital media formats
and cutting-edge technologies force change upon
organizations. Today, marketers around the world at
all levels are expected to select and manage a wide
array of marketing technologies in addition to their
“traditional” marketing responsibilities.
In an era of technology-driven marketing, senior
marketers must have the skill set necessary to
understand these technologies and implement them
within the marketing department. What remains to
be seen is if marketers are ready for the accelerating
technological shift that is happening around them.
To help answer this question, DataXu surveyed 532
marketers across the U.S., the UK, Germany, France,
Spain and Italy to uncover the role and impact of
technology on the strategy and day-to-day operations
of marketing teams around the world. Although use
of marketing technologies varies by region, our survey
reveals that marketing technologies have been widely
adopted at a variety of organizations around the globe to
cover an ever-expanding array of functions.
Differences Between Martech and AdtechTwo categories of technologies are frequently utilized by
marketers: martech solutions and adtech solutions.
Martech typically refers to marketing tools that
are used to target known customers, while adtech
typically refers to tools that allow marketers to target
anonymous audiences.
Martech tools include: CRM platforms, marketing
automation solutions, social media management
and e-commerce technologies.
Adtech tools include: data management platforms,
demand-side platforms, tag management solutions
and ad servers.
Growing Importance of Technology SkillsMarketing technology skills have become mission-
critical prerequisites for senior marketers looking to
succeed within their organizations.
The United States leads all other countries surveyed
in terms of senior marketers’ authority over technology
decisions, control over marketing technology budgets
within the marketing department, and expected levels
of marketing technology prowess at the senior level.
However, marketers from all countries are leveraging
martech and adtech solutions in greater numbers
than ever before. Many marketers anticipate adding
additional solutions to their marketing technology
stacks over the next 12 months.
Marketing technologies have the potential to bring
significant cost-savings to the table if leveraged
correctly, but they also bring along additional
complexity and challenges.
The following pages detail key insights derived from
DataXu's survey of 532 global marketers.
Key Findings
• In 2016, understanding marketing technology
has become table stakes for senior marketers.
• U.S. marketers lead the rest of the world in
utilization of both martech and adtech solutions.
• Marketers tend to use a variety of marketing
technology point solutions and vendors rather
than one full-stack solution, but acknowledge
that they are stretched too thin across too many
platforms as a result.
• Customer insight analytics and programmatic
marketing are two areas in which marketers
expect to increase investments in 2017.
• The perceived benefits of bringing martech or
adtech in-house vary by region: cost efficiency is
the primary driver behind bringing technologies
in-house for U.S., UK and Italian marketers, while
increased transparency and improved campaign
performance are the key benefits German, French
and Spanish marketers attribute to in-house tech.
• Marketers' number-one marketing challenge
is understanding how to create an effective
marketing mix across channels.
© DataXu, Inc. 3
The research for this report was carried out in May
2016 by market research specialist Morar and Withpr
on behalf of DataXu. An online survey of 29 questions
was administered to and completed by a total of 532
global marketers (Figure 1). The results from the survey
are analyzed within this report.
Company Size• 76% of marketers surveyed are part of companies
with 500 or more total employees.
• 21% of marketers surveyed are part of companies
with 250 to 499 total employees.
Geographic Location• 174 marketer respondents are based in the U.S.
• 156 marketer respondents are based in the UK.
• 52 marketer respondents are based in France.
• 150 marketer respondents are based in Germany
(50), Spain (50) and Italy (50).
Annual Marketing Budget• 24% of marketers hold annual marketing budgets
of over USD $1.45 million.
• 33% of marketers hold marketing budgets of
between USD $750,000 and USD $1.45 million.
• 33% of marketers hold marketing budgets of
between USD $150,000 and USD $749,999.
• 10% of marketers surveyed hold marketing
budgets of USD $149,999 or less.
Country # of Marketers Surveyed
United States 174
United Kingdom 156
France 52
Germany 50
Spain 50
Italy 50
2. Report Methodology
Location of Survey Respondents
Figure 1. 532 marketers were surveyed for this report. 174 respondents are based in the United States. 358 respondents are based in Europe.
Seniority of Survey Respondents• 16% of survey respondents hold a Chief
Marketing Officer title.
• 9% of survey respondents hold a Chief
Marketing Technologist title.
• 3% of survey respondents hold a Vice
President of Marketing title.
• 23% of survey respondents hold a Director
of Marketing title.
• 15% of survey respondents hold a Head
of Marketing title.
• 19% of survey respondents hold a
Marketing Manager title.
Profile of U.S. Respondents• 174 U.S. marketers' responses are included
in this report.
• 38% of U.S. marketers surveyed hold an
Executive title, Head of Marketing title or
Vice President of Marketing title.
• 18% of U.S. marketers surveyed hold a
Director of Marketing title.
• 24% of U.S. marketers surveyed hold a
Marketing Manager title.
Profile of European Respondents• 358 European marketer responses are
included in this report.
• 19% of European marketers surveyed hold
a CMO or Vice President of Marketing title.
• 11% of European marketers hold a CMT title.
• 25% of European marketers hold a Director
of Marketing title.
• 17% of European marketers hold a Head of
Marketing role.
• 17% of European marketers hold a Marketing
Manager title.
• 11% of European marketers hold a different title.
© DataXu, Inc.4
3. The Rise Of The Marketing TechnologistMore marketers than ever before are responsible for
purchasing and managing marketing technologies
within their organizations.
To succeed as a senior marketer today requires a deep
understanding of marketing technologies as well as
hands-on experience in implementing technologies
across the team.
• 78% of U.S. marketers and 63% of European
marketers surveyed identify understanding
marketing technology as an increasingly
important skill for senior marketers looking
to be successful in their role (Figure 2).
• 72% of all global marketers identify creativity
as the most important skill necessary for
marketing success.
• 72% of U.S. marketers surveyed identify
understanding digital media as an increasingly
important skill, compared with just 52% of
European marketers surveyed.
• 64% of U.S. marketers feel people management
skills are increasingly important, compared with
58% of European marketers surveyed.Figure 2. 78% of U.S. marketers feel that understanding marketing technology is a critically important skill for successful senior marketers, compared to 63% of European marketers surveyed. Understanding marketing technology is identified by U.S. marketers as second only to "creativity" (79%) as an increasingly important skill for senior marketers.
What skills are becoming increasingly important for successful senior marketers?
79% 78%
Creativity Understanding marketing technology
Understanding digital media
Managing people Being data literate
69%72%
63%68%
72%
52%
59%
64%
58% 60%65%
54%58%
USA Europe Global
4 © DataXu, Inc.
© DataXu, Inc. 5
• 72% of European marketers categorize their
business as much more digitally advanced or
more digitally advanced than average or than their
competitors, compared to 69% of U.S. marketers.
• 15% of U.S. marketers categorized their
marketing leadership team as more traditional
than digital, compared with just 9% of European
marketers who categorized their marketing
leadership team as more traditional than digital.
How digitally advanced would you say your overall business is?
Figure 3. When it comes to assessing the digital expertise of their business, Europeans feel more confident in their organization's digital skills than U.S. marketers do. 72% of European marketers categorize their organizations as much more digitally advanced or more digitally advanced than average/than their competitors, compared to 69% of U.S. marketers.
Global
Much more advanced than average/ competitors
Less advanced than average/competitors
Much less than average/competitors
About the same as the average
More advanced than average/
competitors
6%
0%
23%
23%
48%
USA
Much more advanced than average/ competitors
Less advanced than average/competitors
Much less than average/competitors
About the same as the average
43%23%
8%
0%
26%
More advanced than average/
competitors
Europe
Much more advanced than average/ competitors
Less advanced than average/competitors
Much less than average/competitors
About the same as the average
More advanced than average/
competitors
50%
22%
23%
5%
1%
Digital Expertise Within Marketing
Organizations and Leadership Teams
When it comes to comfort levels and experience with
digital, marketer responses vary by region. European
marketers are slightly more confident in their marketing
leadership teams' digital skills than U.S. marketers
are. When it comes to their overall business, European
marketers feel marginally more confident in their
organization's digital skills than U.S. marketers do
(Figure 3).
© DataXu, Inc. 5
© DataXu, Inc.6
Presence of Dedicated Technology StaffThe U.S. leads the world in terms of the level of senior
marketers' responsibility for marketing technology,
control of technology budgets within the marketing
department, and expected levels of marketing
technology prowess at the senior level.
However, compared to their global peer set, Spain and
Italy have the highest percentage of teams with a staff
member mainly responsible for marketing technology.
• 94% of Spanish marketers, 76% of Italian
marketers, and 76% of U.S. marketers are
part of a team that includes a staff member
mainly responsible for marketing technology.
• 66% of European marketers are part of a team
that includes a staff member mainly responsible
for marketing technology (Figure 4).
Many organizations who do not yet have a dedicated
team member to manage marketing technology plan
on creating this position in the coming year (Figure 4).
• 13% of U.S. marketers, 15% of European
marketers overall and 19% of UK marketers
state that they plan to hire someone to manage
marketing technologies in the next 12 months.
Figure 4. 76% of U.S. marketers and 66% of European marketers state that their department includes a team member mainly responsible for marketing tech usage.
No, but we are looking to recruit someone in the next 12 months
No, but our marketing department will become more technology focused
No, and I don’t think it’s necessary to have a dedicated person to own this in the next 12 months
USA
No, but our IT department will get more involved in martech decisions
Yes76%
3%4%
4%
13%
No, but we are looking to recruit someone in the next 12 months
No, but our marketing department will become more technology focused
No, and I don’t think it’s necessary to have a dedicated person to own this in the next 12 months
Europe
No, but our IT department will get more involved in martech decisions
Yes66%
3%
6%
10%
15%
No, but we are looking to recruit someone in the next 12 months
No, but our marketing department will become more technology focused
No, and I don’t think it’s necessary to have a dedicated person to own this in the next 12 months
Global
No, but our IT department will get more involved in martech decisions
Yes70%
3%5%
8%
15%
Do you have a person on your marketing team who is mainly responsible for marketing technology usage?
© DataXu, Inc. 7
Ownership of Marketing Technology BudgetsWhen it comes to controlling marketing technology
budgets, ownership varies by region. In Europe,
pockets remain in which non-marketers retain
control of marketing technology budgets. However,
these companies are laggards when compared to
companies in the U.S. in which marketing departments
tend to also control marketing technology budgets.
• 49% of European marketers state that in cases
where their organization has a designated role or
team outside of marketing to manage marketing
technologies, that team controls a separate
budget (Figure 5).
• 33% of U.S. marketers state that in cases where
their organization has a designated team outside of
marketing to manage marketing technologies, that
team controls a separate budget (Figure 5).
Who is responsible for marketing technology purchases at your company?
Other
Europe
IT Manager
ChiefMarketing
Officer (CMO)
Chief MarketingTechnologist (CMT)
Chief Digital Officer (CDO)
Other
Digital Director
Brand Manager
Digital Manager
IT Director
Head of Digital
Marketing Manager
Chief Information Officer (CIO)
Head of IT
Chief Technology Officer (CTO)
VP Marketing
Marketing DirectorHead of Marketing
18%
16%
11%9%8%
7%
6%
6%
4%
4%
3%3%
1%
Global
ChiefMarketing
Officer (CMO)
Chief MarketingTechnologist (CMT)
Chief Digital Officer (CDO)
Other
Digital Director
Brand Manager
Digital Manager
IT Director
Head of Digital
Marketing Manager
Chief Information Officer (CIO)
Head of IT
VP Marketing
Chief Technology Officer (CTO) Marketing DirectorHead of Marketing
22%
14%
9%9%7%
6%
8%
5%
4%4%
4%3%
1%2%
USA
IT Manager
ChiefMarketing
Officer (CMO)
Chief MarketingTechnologist (CMT)
Chief Digital Officer (CDO)
Digital Director
Brand Manager
Digital Manager
IT Director
Head of Digital
Marketing Manager
Chief Information Officer (CIO)
Head of IT
Chief Technology Officer (CTO)
VP Marketing
Marketing DirectorHead of Marketing
31%
8%
6%8%4%3%
11%
5%
5%
5%5%
3%
1%
Figure 5. According to the responses of U.S. marketers, marketing departments in the U.S. typically seem to maintain responsibility over marketing technologies and all associated budgets. In Europe, marketers tend to give up control of marketing technology budgets once a separate technology team has been established.
Do you have a person on your marketing team who is mainly responsible for marketing technology usage?
2%
© DataXu, Inc.8
The Rise of the Chief Marketing TechnologistA new addition to the traditional suite of marketing
roles has steadily been gaining traction in recent years.
The role of Chief Marketing Technologist (CMT)
is currently staffed at two-thirds (66%) of survey
respondents' companies (Figure 6).
• The CMT role is especially prevalent in the UK
and in Europe. 73% of European marketers
state that their company currently has a Chief
Marketing Technologist (CMT) in place.
• U.S. organizations lag behind their Europen
counterparts in adding the CMT role to marketing
department staffing plans. Only 53% of U.S.
marketers state that their company currently
has a CMT in place.
Does your company currently have a Chief Marketing Technologist (CMT) in place?
Figure 6. The role of Chief Marketing Technologist has become increasingly prevalent in Europe. 73% of European survey respondents state that their organization currently has a CMT role in place. Only 53% of U.S. respondents state that their company currently has a CMT role in place.
Global
USA
Europe
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
34%
47%
27%
66%
53%
73%
• The CMT role may become more prevalent in
U.S. organizations in 2017. Of U.S. marketers
surveyed who do not currently have a CMT role
in place, 26% indicate that their organization is
looking to fill a CMT role in the next 12 months.
• Expect to see even more European companies
hiring CMTs in the coming year. Of the European
marketers surveyed who do not currently have a
CMT role in place, 24% indicate that their org is
looking to fill a CMT role in the next 12 months.
• Globally, 42% of marketers whose organizations
do not currently have a CMT role in place plan
to make their marketing departments more
technology-focused over the next 12 months,
rather than hiring for a dedicated CMT position.
© DataXu, Inc.10
4. The Positives (And Pitfalls) Of Martech And AdtechAdvertising to and interacting with consumers is
becoming increasingly fragmented and complex.
Consumers around the world are using multiple
devices simultaneously. The rapid proliferation of paid,
owned and earned content available on the Internet
is also contributing to an environment in which it is
difficult to attract and retain consumer attention.
Today, a wide variety of marketing technologies exist
to help brand marketers and their agencies understand
consumer behavior and regain control over specific
marketing channels, campaigns and programs.
Global Marketing Technology Utilization
The majority of global marketers surveyed currently
leverage point solutions for at least three categories
of marketing activities: social media management,
email marketing and digital advertising (Figure 7).
U.S. marketers lead the globe in terms of the scale of
their marketing technology utilization. Some marketers
juggle ten or more specialized technology solutions,
while only 3% of U.S. marketers surveyed do not use
any specialized marketing technologies.
For which aspects of your marketing strategy or execution do you currently use specialized marketing technology software?
Figure 7. Specialized marketing technologies are utilized worldwide for a variety of marketing functions. Adoption and usage rates vary according to size of company, annual budget and geographic location.
USA Europe GlobalOther 1%
71%
71%
65%
41%
34%
24%
3%
36%
31%
20%
1%
Social media management
56%
Email marketing 55%
Digital advertising(including display,
mobile, social media and video)
52%
Content marketing 34%
PR 30%
Programmatic marketing 25%
We do not use anymarketing technologies 2%
Customer insights/analysis 35%
CRM 29%
SEO 21%
70%
60%
56%
37%
31%
25%
2%
35%
30%
21%
0%
© DataXu, Inc. 11
Marketing Technology DefinitionsWhile hundreds of marketing technology solutions and
providers are available, the following nine categories of
marketing technology are typically leveraged by brand
marketers and their agencies.
Social Media Management Software (SMMS)SMMS is software that facilitates an organization’s
ability to successfully engage in social media activities
across different communication channels. SMMS is
typically used by marketers to monitor inbound and
outbound conversations, document social marketing
initiatives and evaluate the effectiveness of a
company's social media presence.
Email Marketing SoftwareEmail marketing software provides businesses with all of
the tools needed to create and execute email marketing
campaigns, including: templates, design tools and
contact-management solutions. Email software sends
emails out via its own server and provides analytics on
the success of each campaign.
Content Marketing/Management SoftwareContent marketing software helps marketers define and
manage a user’s end-to-end content process. Content
software is typically used to create, store and manage
content; track content by date; assign workflows;
assign user permissions; distribute content and/or
analyze content effectiveness.
Customer Relationship
Management (CRM) SoftwareCRM software is a category that covers a broad set
of applications designed to help businesses manage
customer data and track customer interactions. These
programs are typically used by Sales and Marketing and
allow teams to access business information, track leads
and opportunities, manage business contracts, manage
employee, vendor and partner relationships and provide
customer support.
Digital Advertising SoftwareDigital advertising software is a broad category that
covers data management platforms (DMPs), ad
exchanges, supply-side platforms (SSPs) and, less
commonly, demand-side platforms (DSPs). These
four technologies form the broader digital advertising
ecosystem. Within this ecosystem, large amounts of
data are collected, integrated and managed by the DMP.
Publishers connect their inventory to ad exchanges and
DSPs and buyers purchase advertising inventory directly
from an ad exchange, ad network, or via a DSP.
Search Engine Optimization Software (SEO)SEO software offers keyword suggestions and quality
ratings to help marketers' businesses and content
rank better in search results. SEO software can help
organizations perform better than competitors in search,
and drive highly qualified website traffic from search.
Public Relations (PR) SoftwarePR software can be used to locate company press
mentions, assess competitors' share of voice, publish
press releases, collect press analytics and push out
pitches to journalists.
Customer Insights/Analysis SoftwareCustomer insights/analysis software, also known as
customer intelligence software, helps marketers analyze
available customer data and past behaviors in order to
inform future marketing strategies. This category of
software is typically used to segment customers into
sub-groups, track customers as they move across
segments over time, predict future behaviors of
customers, determine customer lifetime value and
access machine-based learning recommendations
to improve future marketing efforts.
Programmatic Marketing SoftwareProgrammatic media buying, marketing and advertising
software enables marketers or their designated agents to
make algorithmic purchases of advertising space in real-
time using computers. The term programmatic software
is commonly used to refer to demand-side platforms
(DSPs). Programmatic software is used to automate the
buying, placement and optimization of media inventory
via a bidding system. Programmatic software typically
helps marketers achieve cost and time efficiencies,
while simultaneously enabling better targeting of and
personalized messaging to advertising recipients.
© DataXu, Inc. 11
© DataXu, Inc.12
Marketing Technology Utilization According
to Location and Budget SizeThe utilization of certain marketing technologies varies
by geographic location and/or annual budget size.
Customer relationship management technologies and
content marketing technologies display a significant
amount of variation by location and by annual budget.
CRM Technology UtilizationThe use of customer relationship management (CRM)
marketing technologies varies widely by geographic
location and budget size.
• 40% of German marketers with budgets over
USD $1.45 million use CRM technologies,
compared with only 28% of German marketers
who manage budgets of less than USD $1.45
million (Figure 8).
• Only 10% of Southern European marketers with
budgets over USD $1.45 million use specialized
CRM technologies, while 25% of their peers
with budgets of between USD $750,000 to USD
$1.45 million use CRM technologies (Figure 8).
• Globally, more marketers with annual budgets of
between USD $750,000 and USD $1.45 million
use CRM marketing technologies (31%) than
marketers with annual budgets greater than
USD $1.45 million (26%).
Marketers who currently utilize specialized customer relationship management (CRM) marketing technologies
Figure 8. The UK and the U.S. lead the rest of the world in utilization of CRM marketing technologies. Southern Europe lags behind both the U.S. and the rest of Europe in terms of CRM marketing technology usage.
Marketers with USD $1.45M+ annual budget
Marketers with USD $750,000 to $1.45M+ annual budget
Global
26%
31%
37%35%
31%34%
40%
28%
10%
25%
UK USA Germany SouthernEurope
12
© DataXu, Inc. 13
Content Marketing Technology Utilization
According to Location and Budget SizeThe use of content marketing technologies varies widely
according to size of annual marketing budget (Figure 9).
• Of all global marketers (except for those based in
the UK), marketers with annual budgets of less
than USD $1.45 million are more likely to utilize
specialized content marketing technologies than
marketers with budgets over USD $1.45 million.
• Budget size does not seem to have a noticeable
impact on content marketing technology
utilization in either the U.S. or the UK.
• United States marketers surveyed lead the rest
of the world in terms of specialized content
marketing technology utilization (~45%).
• Marketers based in Southern Europe with large
budgets are the least likely of all respondents to
have content marketing technologies in place.
Marketers who currently use specialized content marketing technologies
Figure 9. Marketers who control marketing budgets of less than USD $1.45 million are more likely to utilize specialized content marketing technologies than marketers who control larger budgets. UK marketers are the one exception to this trend.
Marketers with USD $1.45M+ annual budget
Marketers with USD $750,000 to $1.45M+ annual budget
34%
40%37%
35%
44% 45%
30%
39%
22%
40%
Global UK USA Germany SouthernEurope
© DataXu, Inc. 13
© DataXu, Inc.14
Marketing departments are being tasked with more
responsibilities than ever by leadership teams—while
facing unprecedented scrutiny from Finance and
Procurement. Best-of-breed point solutions offer
value to busy marketers with the promise of increased
performance and workflow efficiencies.
Unfortunately, technologies originally created to
save marketers time and money have proliferated and
gained complexity in recent years to the point where
they are now identified as the largest current source of
anxiety and fear for marketers around the globe.
When Marketing Solutions Also Become
Marketing ChallengesAlthough marketing technologies have been enginered
to streamline workflows for everything from ad
buying to content creation and customer relationship
management, there are also unique challenges
associated with adopting a variety of technology point
solutions within the marketing department.
When asked what the current biggest threat is to
their marketing team's success, 23% of global
marketers say "being stretched too thin due to working
with and managing too many vendors." (Figure 10)
What is the largest current threat to your marketing team's success?
Figure 10. 23% of global marketers surveyed identify "being stretched too thin due to working with and managing too many vendors" as the largest current threat to their team's success.
Skepticism from the C-Suite around the validity of our current marketing strategy Being stretched too thin
due to working with andmanaging too many vendors
Rumors from Financethat our marketing
budget is being reduced
Proving that one channel works better than another channel
Poor staff retention and difficulties finding the right talent for our team
Poor visibility into metrics on whether or not our marketing is working
Global
8%
12%
15%
21%
21%
23%
14
© DataXu, Inc. 15
Europe
USA
Current Threats Perceived By U.S. and
European Marketing Departments Although 23% of all global marketers surveyed identify
being stretched too thin across marketing technology
vendors and platforms as their greatest current threat,
U.S. marketer and European marketer responses vary
when it comes to identifying other significant threats.
• 24% of U.S. marketers, 22% of European
marketers overall, and 24% of UK marketers
identify being stretched too thin due to working
with too many marketing technology platforms
and/or vendors as the largest current threat to
their team's success (Figure 11).
• 25% of European marketers identify “rumors
from Finance that our marketing budget is being
reduced” as their greatest current threat.
• 11% of U.S. marketers identify “rumors from
Finance that our marketing budget is being
reduced” as their greatest current threat.
• 22% of U.S. marketers, 21% of European
marketers overall, and 22% of UK marketers
identify "poor visibility into metrics on whether
or not our marketing is working" as their greatest
current threat.
• 20% of U.S. marketers identify poor staff
retention and difficulties sourcing marketing
talent as their largest current threat, compared to
just 14% of UK marketers and 13% of European
marketers overall.
What is the largest current threat to your marketing team's success?
Figure 11. “Rumors from Finance that our marketing budget is being reduced” is the number one threat selected by European marketers. “Being stretched too thin due to working with too many marketing technology vendors” is the number one threat selected by U.S. marketers.
Skepticism from the C-Suite around the validity of our current marketing strategy
Skepticism from the C-Suite around the validity of our current marketing strategy
Being stretched too thindue to working with and
managing too many vendors
Rumors from Financethat our marketing
budget is being reduced
Poor visibility into metrics on whether or not our marketing is working
Being stretched too thindue to working with and
managing too many vendors
Rumors from Financethat our marketing budgetis being reduced
Proving that one channel works better than another channel
Proving that one channel works better than another channel
Poor staff retention and difficulties finding the right talent for our team
Poor staff retention and difficulties finding the right talent for our team
Poor visibility into metrics on whether or not our marketing is working
7%
9%
11%
9%
16%
13%
20%
21%
22%
22%
24%
25%
1% Other
© DataXu, Inc.16
Global
Number One Challenge for Marketers Is
Generating Marketing ROI Across ChannelsWhile marketing technologies can be valuable assets for
the majority of global marketing departments, they also
contribute an additional layer of challenges to
both strategic and day-to-day marketing operations.
Perhaps this is why 41% of all marketers surveyed state
that the biggest marketing challenge they face today is
figuring out how to create the most efficient marketing
mix across channels to drive results (Figure 12).
When marketers' second and third biggest challenges
are also considered, it becomes clear that marketers
across the globe struggle with quantifying the impact
their marketing efforts have on sales outcomes.
• 74% of global marketers state that their biggest
marketing challenge is quantifying the effect that
marketing efforts have on new sales revenue,
or creating/quantifying the most efficient
cross-channel mix possible to drive results.
• 75% of European marketers overall, 70% of UK
marketers and 70% of U.S. marketers state that
their biggest marketing challenge is quantifying
the effect that marketing efforts have on new
sales revenue, or creating/quantifying the most
efficient cross-channel mix possible to drive
results (Figure 13, page 17).
5. Solving The Marketing ROI Measurement Challenge
What is the biggest marketing challenge you face today?
Figure 12. The number one marketing challenge identified by marketer respondents from the U.S., Europe and the UK is creating the most efficient marketing mix possible across channels to drive results.
Unifying one brand across different international programs
Creating the most efficient marketing mix across
channels to drive results
Quantifying the effect my marketing efforts have
on new sales revenue
Preserving/defending my marketing budget in the face of Finance cuts
Finding competent marketing staff
Successfully mastering all the new technologies needed to stay ahead
Finding the right attribution model to show the impact of each channel in the path to purchase
8%
5% 3%
10%
15%
18%
41%
Top Three Resolution RoadblocksWhen Figures 11, 12 and 13 are considered together,
it is clear that creating the most efficient marketing mix and quantifying the effect of that mix on sales has become the holy grail of modern marketing. Yet the
following three challenges prevent many marketers
from moving forward to measure their marketing's ROI.
1. Few partners or platforms offer marketing technology solutions today which reliably address cross-channel analysis and optimization.
Real-time cross-channel marketing mix analysis and
optimization can be tricky. Technology is needed
to identify the most efficient mix possible to drive ROI.
© DataXu, Inc. 17
2. Marketers are busier than ever juggling technologies, reporting and vendor management.
In the previous section of this report, “being stretched
too thin due to working with and managing too many
marketing technologies” is identified as the single
greatest threat to the success of marketing teams
by 23% of global marketer respondents (Figure 10).
Traditional econometrics studies or bottom-up
attribution methods leading to cross-channel
optimization take significant amounts of both time
and resources. Few marketers today find themselves
with an excess of either.
3. Platform-specific success metrics or measurement
standards unique to individual “walled gardens” such
as Facebook or Google cause headaches later when
attempting to analyze marketing return on investment
(ROI) and/or channel performance.
Aggregating and normalizing channel-specific campaign
data for which “apples-to-apples” equivalents may not
exist to create a single holistic performance report can
be time-intensive and challenging.
As illustrated in Figure 11 on page 15, the second
greatest self-identified threat to the success of
marketing teams around the world is poor visibility
into metrics on whether or not marketing efforts
are working.
Inability to prove the effectiveness of each marketing
channel is also identified as a significant threat.
Figure 13. 12% of U.S. marketers, 10% of European marketers overall and 8% of UK marketers identify mastering all of the new marketing technologies needed to stay ahead as their biggest marketing challenge.
What is the biggest marketing challenge you face today?
USA
Europe
Unifying one brand across different international programs
Unifying one brand across different international programs
Creating the most efficient marketing mix across
channels to drive results
Creating the most efficient marketing mix across
channels to drive results
Quantifying the effect my marketing efforts have
on new sales revenue
Quantifying the effect my marketing efforts have
on new sales revenue
Preserving/defending my marketing budget in the face of Finance cuts
Preserving/defending my marketing budget in the face of Finance cuts
Finding competent marketing staff
Finding competent marketing staff
Successfully mastering all the new technologies needed to stay ahead
Successfully mastering all the new technologies needed to stay ahead
Finding the right attribution model to show the impact of each channel in the path to purchase
Finding the right attribution model to show the impact of each channel in the path to purchase
8%
8%
7%
4%
3%
3%
12%
10%
13%
16%
16%
20%
37%
43%
© DataXu, Inc.18
The Future of Data and Analytics Within
Global Marketing DepartmentsData and analytics have become more important than
ever in marketers' quest to create the most efficient and
effective marketing mix possible across channels.
The United States leads all other countries surveyed
when it comes to seeing the business value in data and
analytics and leveraging data to assess the performance
of current marketing strategies.
• 100% of U.S. marketers surveyed feel that data
and analytics will play a crucial role within their
team as well as within other marketing teams
more broadly in the future (Figure 14).
• Many French and Spanish marketers feel that
leveraging data and analytics will help ensure
that future marketing efforts make a significant
business impact.
• A few French and Spanish marketers express
concern that they lack the knowledge required
to use data correctly, while a small number of
French marketers express resistance to the idea
of incorporating data and analytics into future
marketing efforts.
• A few Spanish marketers express concern that
increased use of data may result in staffing cuts
within the marketing department.
• The majority of UK marketers state that the
increased use of data and analytics will help their
department with marketing strategy, help to
achieve more visible wins within the company, or
will assist in making their day-to-day tasks easier.
• A few UK marketers indicate that they do not feel
data and analytics are relevant to their business,
or that they do not wish to dive deeper into data
and analytics within their department.
“Many marketing technologies used to
measure and target advertising have
failed to keep up with changing consumer
behaviors. As a result, media budgets and
consumer media consumption have fallen
increasingly out of alignment.”
- Aaron Kechley, SVP of Product, DataXu
18 © DataXu, Inc.
© DataXu, Inc. 19
Being able to track and monitor data and
analytics is a major day-to-day task.
Enables me to see what does and doesn't work.
Data tells us how well or how poorly our
marketing team is doing in regards to driving sales and maximizing profit.
Data and analytics plays a large role for the marketing team. We run reports on a daily and monthly basis to see how our strategies are
working and how each medium is performing.
Data and analytics has a major impact on [our] marketing. Data allows us to see what's good
and what we need to improve.
Data and analytics provide important
information that allows the best utilization of resources in order to
assure the highest ROI.
I believe that [leveraging] data and analytics is the best
way to go for our marketing team
in the future.
Better understanding of marketing
ROI.
Data and analytics help us advertise more
efficiently.
Quantitative measures don't lie.
Data and analytics are very important. They
measure how well what you've instituted is working, and what
changes you should make depending on the results.
Data analysis is a key factor in determining the company's
marketing goals. Our company is continually looking to enhance or improve the
amount and quality of data received in order to improve our marketing strategies.
What role/impact do you see data and analytics having on your marketing team (or on marketing teams in general) in the future?
Figure 14. 100% of U.S. marketers surveyed feel that data and analytics will have an increasingly important role to play within their own team and other marketing teams in the future. A sample of U.S. marketers' answers to this open response survey question are featured above.
© DataXu, Inc. 19
© DataXu, Inc.20
Responsibility for Marketing Data
Marketers' attitudes towards data and analytics vary
according to their title and geographic region.
Figure 15 identifies the individual within the org who
marketers feel is primarily responsible for the day-to-day
management of data to inform marketing strategy.
• 25% of global marketers state that the Chief
Marketing Officer is the individual responsible
within their organization for the day-to-day
management of data to inform marketing strategy.
• 14% of global marketers identify the Director
of Marketing as responsible for the day-to-day
management of data to inform marketing strategy.
• 11% of global marketers identify the Vice
President of Marketing as responsible for the
day-to-day management of data.
• 65% of global CMO survey respondents feel
that they are responsible for the day-to-day
management of data to inform marketing strategy.
• 33% of global CMTs survey respondents feel
that they are responsible for the day-to-day
management of data to inform marketing strategy.
• 22% of VPs surveyed, 24% of Heads of Marketing
surveyed, and 22% of Marketing Directors
surveyed feel that they personally are responsible
for the management of data to inform marketing
strategy within their organization.
Figure 15. 25% of global marketers state that the CMO is responsible for the day-to-day management of data to inform their marketing department's strategy. 14% of global marketers identify their Marketing Director as the responsible party, while 11% identify the VP of Marketing as the responsible party.
Who in your organization is responsible for the day-to-day management of data to inform the marketing strategy?
Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)
Head of Marketing
Brand Manager
Chief Digital Officer (CDO)
Chief Technology Officer (CTO)
Marketing Director
Chief Information Officer (CIO)
Head of Digital
Digital Director
VP of Marketing
Marketing Manager
Other
Head of IT
Chief Marketing Technologist (CMT)
Digital Manager
IT Manager
IT Director
25%
14%
11%
9%
8%
6%
5%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
2%
1%
0%
20
© DataXu, Inc. 21
Role of Data in Annual Budget AllocationsMarketing departments around the world use a variety of
methodologies to allocate annual marketing budgets.
Although the majority of budget allocation methods
utilize data and analytics to inform future marketing
strategies and channel allocations, a few common
allocation methods do not include the consideration of
historical marketing performance data or analytics.
Marketers may wish to review the responses of their
peers (shown in Figure 16) who claim to use data-
driven methods for budget allocation with a slight
dose of skepticism. As the survey responses depicted
in Figures 12 and 13 reveal (pages 16-17), marketers
identify calculating marketing ROI across channels as
their greatest current marketing challenge. Therefore, it
seems unlikely that 37% of all marketers surveyed are
able to accurately analyze the ROI and performance of
each channel and use those metrics to dictate 2017
marketing budget allocations, as stated in Figure 16.
Variation between the responses of all global marketers
surveyed and/or the responses of U.S. and European
marketers surveyed was no more than 1%-3%; therefore
only global results are depicted in Figure 16.
When it comes to allocating your company's annual marketing budget, which process is most similar to the one your company follows?
Figure 16. 37% of global marketers state that they analyze the ROI and performance of each marketing channel before allocating next year's marketing budget to the best-performing channels.
• 7% of global marketers allocate their annual
budget based on direction from the C-Suite.
• 7% of global marketers brainstorm ideas
with their team and allocate budget according
to the most popular ideas generated.
• 2% of global marketers outsource their marketing
to a third-party and are therefore not responsible
for specific allocations within the annual budget.
Global
We actually outsource our marketing to a third-party, so they decide for us.
We analyze ROI from each channel, such as Social Media
or Events or Webinars, and then allocate more spend towards the
highest performance channels for the coming year.
We look at what we spent on line items last year, and increase
spend this year by X%.
We all brainstorm ideas and then allocate budget to what most people agree sounds good for the coming year.
We allocate our budget however the CEO/C-Suite wants us to.
We use technology to generate our annual marketing plan for us.
We employ a consultant to tell us how to spend our budget next year.
2%
7%
7%
8%
12%
27%
37%
• 37% of global marketers state that they analyze
the ROI and performance of each channel before
allocating next year's marketing budget according
to the highest performing channels.
• 27% of global marketers look at what was spent
on line items during the previous year, and
increase future spend by X% for the coming year.
• 12% of marketers employ a consultant to advise
how to allocate budgets in the coming year.
• 8% of global marketers leverage technology
to generate their annual marketing plan.
© DataXu, Inc.22
Even with the added time and resource challenges that
managing multiple point solution technologies brings to
team members, marketers anticipate adding additional
marketing technologies to their marketing tech stack
in the next 12 months (Figure 17). It seems likely that
marketers plan to address previously identified but
as-of-yet-unsolved-for marketing weaknesses and/or
threats through the use of additional marketing tech.
U.S. marketers plan to increase investments in both
customer insights analysis marketing technology as
well as in programmatic marketing technology in 2017.
The following insights were derived from comparing
current marketing technology usage (as depicted
in Figure 7 on page 10) with planned marketing
technology usage over the next 12 months
(depicted in Figure 17).
6. Planned 2017 Marketing Technology Investments
Figure 17. Although European marketers seem to be planning a slight reduction in the utilization of marketing technologies over the next 12 months, European marketers and U.S. marketers alike intend to increase investments in specialized customer insights/analytics software. Content marketing technology usage is projected to rise by 1% in 2017 to 35% utilization by European marketers, while utilization of programmatic marketing technologies in 2017 by U.S. marketers is slated to rise 10% YoY to 34% utilization in 2017.
In which area(s) of marketing are you planning on using marketing technology/software over the next 12 months?
USA Europe GlobalOther 1%
1%
71%
63%
62%
36%
34%
1%
43%
32%
22%
2%
Social media management
47%
Email marketing 42%
Digital advertising(including display,
mobile, social media and video)
42%
Customer insights/analysis 38%
PR 25%
Programmatic marketing 23%
We do not use anymarketing technologies 3%
Content marketing 35%
CRM 25%
SEO 20%
55%
49%
49%
41%
29%
27%
2%
38%
27%
21%
46%
© DataXu, Inc. 23
• 46% of U.S. marketers intend to leverage
specialized customer insights/analytics software
in the coming year, versus the 36% of U.S.
marketers currently utilizing this type of
software. It may be that an increasing sense
of disconnection from today’s consumer is
prompting U.S. marketers to turn to software
to obtain a holistic view of consumers and their
complex behaviors across all devices
and channels.
• 34% of U.S. marketers intend to leverage
specialized programmatic marketing technologies
in the coming year, versus the 24% of U.S.
marketers currently utilizing programmatic
marketing technologies.
• 62% of U.S. marketers intend on leveraging
digital advertising technology in the coming
year—a category of technology often considered
to encompass programmatic marketing in
addition to data management platforms (DMPs),
ad exchanges and supply-side platforms (SSPs).
EU 2017 Marketing Technology InvestmentsMany European marketers plan to slightly reduce
investments in marketing technologies over the next
12 months, with only two categories of technology
attracting increased investment from European
marketers in 2017: customer insights/analytics software
and content marketing software.
• 38% of European marketers surveyed expect to
leverage customer insights/analysis software in
2017, up from the 35% of European marketers
who utilize this type of technology today.
• 35% of European marketers anticipate using
content marketing software in the coming year,
up 1% from the 34% who currently use content
marketing software today.
EU 2017 Marketing Technology ReductionsAmong European marketers, the following technologies
are expected to decrease in utilization over the next 12
months. The catalyst behind this anticipated contrac-
tion in marketing technology usage within Europe in the
coming year may be marketers' self-professed fears of
impending budget cuts to their department.
• Specialized social media technology usage
is slated to decline from 56% of European
marketers to 47% in 2017.
• Email marketing technology usage is slated
to decline from 55% of European marketers
to 42% in 2017.
• Digital advertising technology usage is slated to
decline from 52% of European marketers to 42%.
• PR software usage is slated to decline from 30%
of European marketers to 25%.
• Specialized CRM software usage is slated to
decline from 29% of European marketers to 25%.
• Programmatic marketing technology usage
is slated to decline from 25% of European
marketers to 23% in 2017. The exception to this
trend occurs in the UK, where 37% of marketers
in possession of budgets of more than GBP 1
million intend to utilize programmatic marketing
technology in 2017. Only 26% of UK marketers
with an annual marketing budget of less than
GBP 1 million intend to utilize programmatic
marketing technologies in 2017.
• SEO technology usage is slated to decline 1%
from 21% to 20%. The exception to this trend
occurs within the UK, where 30% of marketers
with annual budgets of more than GBP 1 million
anticipate leveraging SEO technologies in the
coming 12 months.
• German marketers are the least likely to
utilize specialized SEO technologies in 2017;
only 10.5% of German marketers anticipate
using specialized SEO technologies in 2017,
irrespective of budget size.
© DataXu, Inc.24
7. Trends In Martech And Adtech ManagementMarketing organizations around the world utilize a
variety of specialized marketing technology solutions
to streamline marketing workflows, organize marketing
content and advertising campaigns and simplify
analytics and reporting.
However, hands-to-keyboard usage of marketing
technologies is not always the responsibility of brand
marketers. In many instances, marketers indicate that
their company's agency is the primary manager and/
or end user of martech or adtech solutions licensed
on behalf of their company. The party responsible for
the selection of marketing technologies, as well as the
ultimate end user, varies by geographic location of the
organization and size of annual marketing budget.
Perceived Differences Between Martech
Solutions and Adtech Solutions34% of global marketers feel that a distinct difference
exists between martech and adtech solutions. Another
25% of global marketers do not see a difference
between the two categories of technology.
• Among U.S. marketers, 41% feel that there is a
distinct difference between martech and adtech.
17% of U.S. marketers disagree, while the rest
of U.S marketers surveyed are unsure.
• 31% of European marketers see a difference
between martech and adtech; 29% of EU
marketers do not, and the rest are unsure.
I have distinct needs for both martech and adtech and have different solution providers for both. Agree or disagree?
Figure 18. The percentage of marketers who recognize distinct needs for martech and adtech varies by location and by size of annual marketing budget. This graph excludes the responses of global marketers with budgets under USD $750,000.
Distinct Martech Needs Versus Adtech NeedsMore than half (52%) of global marketers state that
they have distinct needs for both martech and adtech
and have different solution providers as a result.
7% of global marketers do not feel that they have
distinct needs for both martech and adtech.
• 56% of U.S. marketers have distinct needs for
both martech and adtech. 8% do not feel they
have distinct needs for martech and for adtech.
• Of U.S. marketers with budgets of USD $750,000
to USD $1.45 million, 60% recognize distinct
needs for martech and adtech (Figure 18).
USD $1.45M+
USD $1.45M+
USD $1.45M+
USD $1.45M+
USD $1.45M+
USD $750K - $1.45M+
USD $750K - $1.45M+
USD $750K - $1.45M+
USD $750K - $1.45M+
USD $750K - $1.45M+
Global UK USA Germany Southern Europe
53%
42%
5% 6%
40%
54%
57% 44%53%
35%30%
60%50%
10%22%
28% 56%
7% 7%
43%
50%37%
5%
42%
60%
5%
52%
4%
43%
Disagree
Neither Agree Nor Disagree
Agree
© DataXu, Inc. 25
• 50% of European marketers recognize a distinct
difference between martech and adtech. 7% of
European marketers do not feel they have distinct
needs for martech and distinct needs for adtech.
• In all European countries surveyed, with the
exception of Germany, marketers with smaller
budgets are more prone to recognize distinct
needs for martech and distinct needs for adtech.
Rising Levels of Collaboration Between
Martech and Adtech VendorsAlthough a large percentage of marketers think about
martech and adtech as being different from one another,
over half of the 532 marketers surveyed state that they
have begun observing more and more collaboration and/
or combined solutions between martech vendors and
platforms and adtech vendors and platforms.
• 70% of U.S. marketers state that they have
begun observing more and more collaboration
and/or combined solutions between martech and
adtech vendors and platforms. Only 2% of U.S.
marketers feel this is not the case.
• 60% of European marketers state that they have
begun observing more and more collaboration
and/or combined solutions between martech and
adtech vendors and platforms. 7% of European
marketers feel that this is not the case.
Future Convergence of Martech and Adtech When asked if they believe martech and adtech will
converge completely within the next five years, the
responses of marketers vary widely.
• 49% of global marketers believe that martech
and adtech will converge completely within the
next five years. 10% disagree with this statement.
• 53% of U.S. marketers believe that martech and
adtech will converge completely within the next
five years. 8% disagree with this statement.
• 47% of European marketers believe that martech
and adtech will converge completely within the
next five years. 11% disagree with this statement.
• UK marketers express higher levels of certainty
on this question than any other sub-group of
European marketers surveyed. 50% of UK
marketers believe that martech and adtech will
converge completely within the next five years.
• 70% of UK marketers with annual marketing
budgets of greater than GBP 1 million believe
that martech and adtech will converge completely
within the next five years.
25
© DataXu, Inc.26
Roles of Brand Marketers And Agencies in
Day-to-Day Martech and Adtech ManagementThe role of the agency during a marketing department's
selection of specific martech solutions and adtech
solutions varies by geographic location and size of
annual marketing budget.
Today, the most prevalent model of marketing
technology management is one of true partnership
between brand marketers and their agencies.
• 54% of global marketers choose technologies in
partnership with their agency, but then leave day-
to-day technology management to agency staff.
• 10% of global marketers leave the selection and
management of technologies entirely in the hands
of their agency.
• 47% of U.S. marketers choose technologies in
partnership with their agency, but then leave day-
to-day technology management to agency staff.
• 18% of U.S. marketers leave the selection
and management of technologies entirely in
the hands of their agency.
• 54% of European marketers choose technologies
in partnership with their agency, but leave day-
to-day technology management to agency staff.
• 10% of European marketers leave the selection
and management of technologies entirely in the
hands of their agency.
© DataXu, Inc.
© DataXu, Inc. 27
Agencies remain trusted partners throughout the marketing technology decision-making process. 54% of all brand marketers surveyed choose
marketing technologies in partnership with their agency, and then entrust the day-to-day management of the technologies to agency staff members.
© DataXu, Inc. 27
© DataXu, Inc.28
Future In-House Management of MartechWhen it comes to managing martech, most marketers
have shifted at least a portion of their martech solutions
in-house (Figure 19, page 29).
• 59% of global marketers expect to manage
significantly more or slightly more martech
in-house in the next 12 months.
• 62% of U.S. marketers surveyed expect to
manage significantly more or slightly more
martech in-house in the next 12 months.
• 58% of European marketers overall expect to
manage significantly more or slightly more
martech in-house in the next 12 months.
• 57% of UK marketers say that all or the majority
of their martech solutions are managed in-house.
• 27% of global marketers surveyed anticipate
current martech levels to stay the same over the
next year.
• 30% of U.S marketers anticipate current martech
levels to stay the same over the next year.
• 25% of European marketers overall anticipate
current martech levels to stay the same over
the next year.
Future In-House Management of AdtechWhen it comes to managing adtech, most marketers
have also shifted at least a portion of their adtech
solutions in-house (Figure 19, page 29).
• 54% of global marketers surveyed expect to
manage significantly more or slightly more
adtech in-house in the next 12 months.
• 55% of U.S. marketers surveyed expect to
manage significantly more or slightly more
adtech in-house in the next 12 months.
• 57% of European marketers overall expect to
manage significantly more or slightly more
adtech in house in the next 12 months.
• 56% of UK marketers say that all or the majority
of their adtech solutions are managed in-house.
• 31% of global marketers surveyed anticipate
current adtech levels to stay the same over the
next year.
• 39% of U.S marketers anticipate current adtech
levels to stay the same over the next year.
• 27% of European marketers overall anticipate
current adtech levels to stay the same over
the next year.
28
© DataXu, Inc. 29
Do you expect the level of martech that is managed in-house by your company to change in the next 12 months?
Do you expect the level of adtech managed in-house at your company to change in the next 12 months?
Figure 19. 32% of global marketers surveyed expect to manage significantly more martech in-house over the next 12 months (versus 29% for adtech). 27% expect to manage slightly more martech in-house (versus 27% for adtech), while 27% of global marketers surveyed anticipate current in-house martech levels staying the same over the next year (versus 31% for adtech).
I expect us to manage significantly less of our martech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly less of our martech in-house
I expect the level to stay the same
MoreLess Same
I expect us to manage significantly more of our martech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly more of our martech in-house
Don’t know
32%27%27%9%1%
4%
Global
Europe
3%
I expect us to manage significantly less of our martech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly less of our martech in-house
I expect the level to stay the same
MoreLess Same
I expect us to manage significantly more of our martech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly more of our martech in-house
Don’t know
1%
3%
USA
24% 38%30%
I expect us to manage significantly less of our martech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly less of our martech in-house
I expect the level to stay the same
MoreLess Same
I expect us to manage significantly more of our martech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly more of our martech in-house
Don’t know
1%
5%
Europe
11% 25% 29% 29%
I expect us to manage significantly less of our adtech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly less of our adtech in-house
I expect the level to stay the same
MoreLess Same
I expect us to manage significantly more of our adtech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly more of our adtech in-house
Don’t know
1%
2%
USA
3%39% 26% 29%
I expect us to manage significantly less of our adtech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly less of our adtech in-house
I expect the level to stay the same
MoreLess Same
I expect us to manage significantly more of our adtech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly more of our adtech in-house
Don’t know
3%
3%
10% 27% 28% 29%
I expect us to manage significantly less of our adtech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly less of our adtech in-house
I expect the level to stay the same
MoreLess Same
I expect us to manage significantly more of our adtech in-house
I expect us to manage slightly more of our adtech in-house
2%
Global
8% 31% 27% 29%
Don’t know3%
© DataXu, Inc.30
What do you believe is the greatest benefit of managing martech in-house? What do you believe the greatest benefit is of managing adtech in-house?
I do not think managing adtech in-house is better -I prefer to work together with my agency
Don’t know/no opinion
It gives advertisers direct access to their own data
I do not think managing adtech in-house is better - I prefer to
outsource this entirely
It offers greater transparency
It gives better results on marketing campaigns
4%5%
13%
21%
24%
32%
1%
1%2%
USA
Don’t know/no opinion
It gives advertisers direct access to their own data
I do not think managing martech in-house is
better - I prefer to work together with my agency
It offers greater transparency
It’s more cost-effective
It gives better results on marketing campaigns
44%
18%
18%
12%
5% 3% Don’t know/no opinion
It gives advertisers direct access to their own data
I do not think managing adtech in-house is better - I prefer to
outsource this entirely
I do not think managing adtech in-house is better - I prefer to work with my agency
It offers greater transparency
It’s more cost-effective
It gives better results on marketing campaigns
38%
22%
17%
14%
6%
Europe
Don’t know/no opinion
It gives advertisers direct access to their own data
I do not think managing martech in-house is better - I prefer to
outsource this entirely
I do not think managing martech in-house is better - I prefer to work together with my agency
It offers greater transparency
It’s more cost-effective
It gives better results on marketing campaigns
24%
11%
1% 1%
5%
28%
25%
5%
Europe
Don’t know/no opinionOther
It gives advertisers direct access to their own data
I do not think managing adtech in-house is better - I prefer to
outsource this entirelyI do not think managing adtech in-house is better - I prefer to work with my agency
It offers greater transparency
It’s more cost-effective
It gives better results on advertising campaigns
20%
13%
1% 1%
4%
28%
27%
6%
Global
It’s more cost-effective
USA
Global
I do not think managing martech in-house is better - I prefer to work together with my agency
Don’t know/no opinion
It gives advertisers direct access to their own data
It’s more cost-effective
It offers greater transparencyIt gives better results on
marketing campaigns
5%5%
11%
22%
23%
33%
1% I do not think managing martech in-house is better - I prefer to
outsource this entirely
Figure 20. For U.S. marketers, the number one perceived benefit of moving both martech and adtech in-house is cost-effectiveness. For European marketers, cost-effectiveness also ranks first, but is closely followed by improved campaign results and increased transparency as the most compelling arguments in favor of managing martech and adtech in-house.
Other
© DataXu, Inc. 31
Benefits of Managing Martech In-House
And Managing Adtech In-HouseWhen it comes to managing martech and/or
adtech in-house, the rationale behind transitioning
technologies in-house varies by region.
The number one perceived benefit of moving both
martech and adtech in house for U.S. marketers is
improved cost-effectiveness (Figure 20, page 30).
For European marketers, cost-effectiveness ranks
first but is closely followed by improved campaign
results and increased transparency as the most
compelling arguments for managing martech and
adtech in-house (Figure 20, page 30).
Bringing Martech In-House
• 44% of U.S. marketers feel that the greatest
benefit of bringing martech in-house is improved
cost-effectiveness.
• 28% of European marketers overall feel that the
greatest benefit of bringing martech in-house is
improved cost-effectiveness.
• 25% of European marketers overall feel that the
greatest benefit of bringing martech in-house is
improved transparency.
• 40% of German marketers feel that the greatest
benefit of bringing martech in-house is improved
transparency.
• 24% of European marketers overall feel that the
greatest benefit of bringing martech in-house is
improved campaign results.
• 39% of French marketers feel that the greatest
benefit of bringing martech in-house is improved
campaign results.
Bringing Adtech In-House
• 38% of U.S. marketers feel that the greatest
benefit of bringing adtech in-house is improved
cost effectiveness.
• 28% of European marketers overall feel that the
greatest benefit of bringing adtech in-house is
improved cost-effectiveness.
• 39% of French marketers feel that the greatest
benefit of bringing adtech in-house is improved
cost effectiveness.
• 20% of European marketers overall feel that the
greatest benefit of bringing adtech in-house is
improved transparency.
• 27% of European marketers overall feel that the
greatest benefit of bringing adtech in-house is
improved campaign results.
• 50% of Spanish marketers feel that the greatest
benefit of bringing adtech in-house is improved
campaign results.
© DataXu, Inc. 31
© DataXu, Inc. 33
In 2016, brand marketers find themselves charged
with the success of their businesses more heavily
than ever before. Perhaps this is why marketing and
advertising technologies continue to make their way
onto marketing budget sheets around the world at an
accelerating pace and scale.
The Increasing Importance of Technology and
Analytics Within Marketing Departments 78% of U.S. marketers identify understanding
marketing technologies as a skill that is increasingly
becoming a prerequisite to success for senior marketers.
Marketing technologies bring numerous efficiencies
and cost-savings to the table if leveraged correctly,
but they also bring their own set of unique challenges.
The responses of the 532 global marketers surveyed for
this report make it clear that the widespread adoption
of a variety of martech and adtech solutions by global
marketers is accompanied by both positives and pitfalls.
Along with marketing technology expertise, 65% of U.S.
marketers identify being data literate and understanding
digital media (72%) as mission-critical skills in today’s
digital-first world.
Disparate Marketing Technology Solutions23% of marketers state that they are stretched too
thin across too many marketing technology vendors
and platforms as a result of utilizing specialized point
solutions for a slew of marketing functions.
8. Conclusion• Some marketers work with ten or more vendors
and/or platforms simultaneously across the
martech and adtech landscapes.
• More and more marketers are considering
bringing marketing or advertising technologies
in-house, although the rationale behind such
a move varies by geographic region.
• Cost efficiency is the primary perceived benefit
of bringing martech and/or adtech in-house
for U.S. marketers.
• Cost efficiency, improved transparency and
improved campaign performance are the key
perceived benefits of bringing martech and/or
adtech in-house for European marketers.
The majority of global marketers already manage at
least a portion of their technology solutions in-house.
However, the most prevalent model of marketing
technology management today is one of true
partnership between marketers and their agencies.
• Among all global marketers surveyed, 54%
choose technologies in partnership with
their agency, but then leave the day-to-day
management of technologies to agency staff.
• 10% of global marketers leave both the selection
of and management of technologies entirely in
the hands of their agency.
Shifting Consumer Behaviors and Difficulty
Measuring Cross-Channel Performance Will
Drive Additional Tech Investments in 2017Customer insight analytics and programmatic marketing
are two additional areas in which marketers expect to
invest marketing dollars over the next 12 months.
• One-third of global marketers cite poor visibility
into metrics on whether or not their marketing is
working, and difficulty proving that one marketing
channel works better than another channel, as
the largest current threats to their team’s success.
• 46% of U.S. marketers intend to leverage
customer insight analytics in 2017, up from the
36% of U.S. marketers currently using these
types of analytics.
• 41% of global marketers and 37% of U.S.
marketers surveyed believe the single biggest
marketing challenge facing their organization
is creating the most efficient marketing mix
possible across channels to drive results.
Few partners or platforms offer marketing technology
solutions today which reliably address cross-channel
analysis and optimization. However, real-time cross-
channel marketing mix analysis and optimization is
the only true solution to marketers' most pressing
challenge: creating the most efficient mix possible
to drive results for their business.
Research Contributors
DataXu’s mission is to make marketing better using data science. The world’s top brands and agencies use DataXu to better understand and engage customers across all devices and
media formats. Our solution provides marketers with unparalleled Media Activation, Marketing Analytics and Data Management capabilities. With sixteen offices in eleven countries,
DataXu’s full-stack solution is powering the digital transformation of the world’s most valuable brands.
Morar are specialists in measuring and advising on brand performance. The team includes researchers, consultants, strategists and software developers; together, providing managers
with the insight and ideas to grow the value of their brands.
Morar’s services include research, strategy and brand positioning. Based in London, Morar’s work spans the globe having worked with over 130 companies in more than 30 countries,
ranging from blue-chip global corporations to small national and local businesses.
Our clients include Burberry, Fitness First, Burtons Biscuits, Moo, Nandos, Mercedes-Benz, Boots, Cancer Research UK, eFinancialCareers, Orange, THUS, WI, Top Up TV, Tata,
Peabody Trust, Ukash, Snell, People Tree, Ping Pong and Tourism New Zealand.
Withpr is a dynamic, full service PR agency, powered by collaborative thinking. Clever, creative and commercially-minded, we specialise in strategic PR across the adtech, fintech
and clean tech sectors. Finalist in PRWeek’s New Consultancy of the Year 2012, Withpr has the rigour, standards and connections of a big agency, with the dynamism, energy and
openness of a smaller team. We cover 12 languages across the team and implement campaigns across the US, LatAm and Europe that deliver business-changing results.
DataXu, Inc. • dataxu.com • 281 Summer Street, 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02210 • 1.857.244.6200 • @DataXu
Boston • New York • Chicago • Detroit • San Francisco • LA • Cologne • London • Madrid • Montevideo • Milan • Paris • Sao Paulo • Singapore • Sydney • Bangalore
DX-WP-MODMIX-001