module 1: lecture 1 classification of optimization problems and … · 2020. 11. 19. ·...

21
Lecture 15d Many problems in optimizing a beam ME 260 at the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and Topology G. K. Ananthasuresh Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Banagalore [email protected] 1

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Lecture 15d

    Many problems in optimizing a beam

    ME 260 at the Indian Inst i tute of Sc ience , Bengaluru

    Str uc tur a l O pt imiz a t io n : S iz e , Sha pe , a nd To po lo g y

    G . K . Ana ntha s ur e s h

    P r o f e s s o r , M e c h a n i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g , I n d i a n I n s t i t u t e o f S c i e n c e , B a n a g a l o r e

    s u r e s h @ i i s c . a c . i n

    1

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Outline of the lectureSome problems in optimizing the cross-section profile of a beam under transverse loading.

    What we will learn:

    How to apply the concepts and ideas learned so far to solve problems in calculus of variations with particular examples of transversely loaded beams.

    2

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    How is a beam different from a bar?(in the context of structural optimization)

    A bar deforms axially whereas a beam displaces transversely. That is, a beam bends. The governing differential equation for a bar is of second order whereas that for a beam is fourth order. So, we should be prepared for tedious calculations in a beam.

    Cross-section area is all that matters for volume and stiffness in a slender bar: its shape does not matter. That is not true for a beam. The volume of a beam depends on the value of cross-section area but the stiffness depends on the second moment of area of cross-section. So, shape of the cross-section matters.

    In this set of problems, we consider only rectangular cross-section of beams. A rectangular has two dimensions, breadth, b(x), and depth, t(x). Both of these can be varied independently (provided that such a beam can be manufactured economically). However, most often, we vary only one of them.

    If is b(x)varied,

    If is t(x)varied,

    For most cross-section shapes, we can write:

    3

    ( ) ( ) ;A x b x t=

    ( ) ( );A x b t x=

    3 2 2( ) ( ) /12 ( ) ( /12) ( /12)I x b x t b x t t t A(x)= = =

    ( )33 2 2 3( ) ( ) /12 ( ) / (12 ) (1 /12 )I x bt x bt x b b A (x)= = =

    ( )I x A=

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 1

    4

    ( ) ( )

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    ( ) : 0 0

    : 0

    : ,q( ), , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    Min MC q wdx

    Subject to

    x EIw q E Aw q

    Adx V

    tData L x E V

    =

    − = − =

    =

    We assume here that only b(x) is variable.

    ( )I x A=2

    ; 112

    t

    = =

    Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 2

    5

    ( )

    2

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    1

    2

    ( ) : 0

    : 0

    : ,q( ), , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    Min SE E Aw dx

    Subject to

    x E Aw q

    Adx V

    tData L x E V

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the strain energy of a beam for given volume of material.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 3

    6

    ( )

    ( )0

    2 *

    0

    2 *

    ( ) : 0

    1: 0

    2

    : ,q( ), , ,SE12

    L

    A x

    L

    Min V Adx

    Subject to

    x E Aw q

    E Aw dx SE

    tData L x E

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the volume of a beam subject to an upper bound on the strain energy.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 4

    7

    ( )

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    ( ) : 0

    : 0

    : ,q( ), , ,MC12

    L

    A x

    L

    Min V Adx

    Subject to

    x E Aw q

    q wdx MC

    tData L x E

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the volume of material for a given upper bound on the mean compliance.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 5

    8

    2

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    2

    : 0

    : , ( ), , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    MMin SE dx

    E A

    Subject to

    Adx V

    tData L M x E V

    =

    =

    Minimize the strain energy of a statically determinate beam for given volume of material. For a statically determinate beam, we can obtain the bending moment without knowing the area of cross-section of the beam.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 6

    9

    2

    ( ) ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    1

    2

    : 0

    : , ( ), , ,12

    L

    A x u x

    L

    Max Min PE E Aw qw dx

    Subject to

    Adx V

    tData L q x E V

    = −

    =

    Min-max formulation for the stiffest beam for given volume of material.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 7

    10

    ( )

    ( )0

    0

    *

    0

    2 *

    : 0

    : 0

    : ,q( ), , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    L

    Min MC q wdx

    Subject to

    E Aw v qv dx

    Adx V

    tData L x E V

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material with the governing equation in the weak form.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 8

    11

    ( )

    ( )0

    0

    *

    0

    2 *

    : 0

    : 0

    ( ) : 0

    ( ) : 0

    : , ( ), , , , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    L

    u u

    l l

    l u

    Min MC q wdx

    Subject to

    E Aw v qv dx

    Adx V

    x A A

    x A A

    tData L q x E V A A

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material and upper and lower bound constraints on the area of cross-section.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 9

    12

    ( )

    ( )0

    3

    0

    *

    0

    *2

    : 0

    : 0

    ( ) : 0

    ( ) : 0

    1: , ( ), , , , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    L

    u u

    l l

    l u

    Min MC q wdx

    Subject to

    E A w v qv dx

    Adx V

    x A A

    x A A

    Data L q x E V A Ab

    =

    − =

    =

    We assume here that only t(x) is variable.

    ( )I x A=

    2

    1; 3

    12b

    = =

    Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material where the depth of the beam is the design variable.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 10

    13

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    : 0

    : , ( ), , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    d

    d

    Min V Adx

    Subject to

    MMdx

    E A

    tData L M(x),M x E

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the volume of a statically determinate beam with a deflection constraint in its span.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 11

    14

    ( )

    ( )

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2

    ( ) : 0

    ( ) : 0

    : 0

    :12

    L

    A x

    d d

    L

    *d

    Min V Adx

    Subject to

    x E Aw q

    x E Av q

    E Aw v dx

    tData L,q(x),q (x),E, = ,Δ

    =

    − =

    − =

    − =

    Minimize the volume of material of a beam (statically determinate or indeterminate) for a deflection constraint in its span.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 12

    15

    ( )

    ( )

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    0

    2 *

    ( ) : 0

    ( ) : 0

    : 0

    1: 0

    2

    : ,12

    L

    A x

    d d

    L

    L

    *d

    Min V Adx

    Subject to

    x E Aw q

    x E Av q

    E Aw v dx

    E Aw dx SE

    tData L,q(x),q (x), = ,E,Δ SE

    =

    − =

    − =

    − =

    − =

    Minimize the volume of material of a beam (statically determinate or indeterminate) for a deflection constraint in its span with an upper bound on the strain energy.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 13

    16

    ( )

    ( )0

    0

    *

    0

    2 *

    : 0

    : 0

    ( ) : 0

    ( ) : 0

    : , ( ), , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    L

    u u

    l l

    l u

    Min MC q wdx

    Subject to

    E Aw v qv dx

    Adx V

    x w w

    x w w

    tData L q x E V ,w ,w

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material and upper and lower bound constraints on the transverse displacement.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 14

    17

    ( )

    ( )0

    0

    *

    0

    2 *

    : 0

    : 0

    ( ) : 0

    ( ) : 0

    : , ( ), , , , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    L

    u t

    l c

    t c

    Min MC q wdx

    Subject to

    E Aw v qv dx

    Adx V

    x E w

    x E w

    tData L q x E V

    =

    − =

    =

    Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material and upper and lower bound constraints on the stress.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 15

    18

    ( )

    q( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    ( ) : 0

    : 0

    : , ( ), , ,12

    L

    x

    L

    Max MC q wdx

    Subject to

    x E Aw q

    p dx W

    tData L A x E W

    =

    − =

    =

    Determine the world load distribution of a beam. Note that the upper bound on the overall load is specified.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 16

    19

    ( )

    2

    ( )0

    *

    0

    2 *

    ( ) : 0

    : 0

    : ,q( ), , ,12

    L

    A x

    L

    Min MC q w dx

    Subject to

    x E Aw q

    Adx V

    tData L x E V

    =

    − =

    =

    A general objective function for a beam problem.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    Problem 17

    20

    0

    3

    *

    0

    *

    1( ) : 0

    12

    : 0

    : ,q( ), ,

    L

    b(x),t(x)

    L

    Min MC q wdx

    Subject to

    x Ebt Aw q

    Adx V

    Data L x E V

    =

    − =

    Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material by varying both breadth and depth of the rectangular cross-section of the beam.

  • Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc

    The end note

    21

    ThanksPra

    ctic

    e p

    rob

    lem

    s in

    cal

    culu

    s o

    f v

    aria

    tio

    ns

    Constraints on displacements and strains (stresses) can be imposed.

    Transversely deforming beam is the second simplest structural optimization problem. Either breadth or depth can be varied; both can be varied too.

    Mean compliance and strain energy are measures of stiffness.Volume of material used is a cost-measure.Objective function and functional constraint can be interchanged without affecting the nature of the solution.

    Constraints can also be imposed on profile of the area of cross-section.

    Equilibrium equation can be posed in strong or weak form without changing the nature of the solution.