module 1: lecture 1 classification of optimization problems and … · 2020. 11. 19. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Lecture 15d
Many problems in optimizing a beam
ME 260 at the Indian Inst i tute of Sc ience , Bengaluru
Str uc tur a l O pt imiz a t io n : S iz e , Sha pe , a nd To po lo g y
G . K . Ana ntha s ur e s h
P r o f e s s o r , M e c h a n i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g , I n d i a n I n s t i t u t e o f S c i e n c e , B a n a g a l o r e
s u r e s h @ i i s c . a c . i n
1
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Outline of the lectureSome problems in optimizing the cross-section profile of a beam under transverse loading.
What we will learn:
How to apply the concepts and ideas learned so far to solve problems in calculus of variations with particular examples of transversely loaded beams.
2
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
How is a beam different from a bar?(in the context of structural optimization)
A bar deforms axially whereas a beam displaces transversely. That is, a beam bends. The governing differential equation for a bar is of second order whereas that for a beam is fourth order. So, we should be prepared for tedious calculations in a beam.
Cross-section area is all that matters for volume and stiffness in a slender bar: its shape does not matter. That is not true for a beam. The volume of a beam depends on the value of cross-section area but the stiffness depends on the second moment of area of cross-section. So, shape of the cross-section matters.
In this set of problems, we consider only rectangular cross-section of beams. A rectangular has two dimensions, breadth, b(x), and depth, t(x). Both of these can be varied independently (provided that such a beam can be manufactured economically). However, most often, we vary only one of them.
If is b(x)varied,
If is t(x)varied,
For most cross-section shapes, we can write:
3
( ) ( ) ;A x b x t=
( ) ( );A x b t x=
3 2 2( ) ( ) /12 ( ) ( /12) ( /12)I x b x t b x t t t A(x)= = =
( )33 2 2 3( ) ( ) /12 ( ) / (12 ) (1 /12 )I x bt x bt x b b A (x)= = =
( )I x A=
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 1
4
( ) ( )
( )0
*
0
2 *
( ) : 0 0
: 0
: ,q( ), , ,12
L
A x
L
Min MC q wdx
Subject to
x EIw q E Aw q
Adx V
tData L x E V
=
− = − =
−
=
We assume here that only b(x) is variable.
( )I x A=2
; 112
t
= =
Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 2
5
( )
2
( )0
*
0
2 *
1
2
( ) : 0
: 0
: ,q( ), , ,12
L
A x
L
Min SE E Aw dx
Subject to
x E Aw q
Adx V
tData L x E V
=
− =
−
=
Minimize the strain energy of a beam for given volume of material.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 3
6
( )
( )0
2 *
0
2 *
( ) : 0
1: 0
2
: ,q( ), , ,SE12
L
A x
L
Min V Adx
Subject to
x E Aw q
E Aw dx SE
tData L x E
=
− =
−
=
Minimize the volume of a beam subject to an upper bound on the strain energy.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 4
7
( )
( )0
*
0
2 *
( ) : 0
: 0
: ,q( ), , ,MC12
L
A x
L
Min V Adx
Subject to
x E Aw q
q wdx MC
tData L x E
=
− =
−
=
Minimize the volume of material for a given upper bound on the mean compliance.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 5
8
2
( )0
*
0
2 *
2
: 0
: , ( ), , ,12
L
A x
L
MMin SE dx
E A
Subject to
Adx V
tData L M x E V
=
−
=
Minimize the strain energy of a statically determinate beam for given volume of material. For a statically determinate beam, we can obtain the bending moment without knowing the area of cross-section of the beam.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 6
9
2
( ) ( )0
*
0
2 *
1
2
: 0
: , ( ), , ,12
L
A x u x
L
Max Min PE E Aw qw dx
Subject to
Adx V
tData L q x E V
= −
−
=
Min-max formulation for the stiffest beam for given volume of material.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 7
10
( )
( )0
0
*
0
2 *
: 0
: 0
: ,q( ), , ,12
L
A x
L
L
Min MC q wdx
Subject to
E Aw v qv dx
Adx V
tData L x E V
=
− =
−
=
Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material with the governing equation in the weak form.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 8
11
( )
( )0
0
*
0
2 *
: 0
: 0
( ) : 0
( ) : 0
: , ( ), , , , ,12
L
A x
L
L
u u
l l
l u
Min MC q wdx
Subject to
E Aw v qv dx
Adx V
x A A
x A A
tData L q x E V A A
=
− =
−
−
−
=
Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material and upper and lower bound constraints on the area of cross-section.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 9
12
( )
( )0
3
0
*
0
*2
: 0
: 0
( ) : 0
( ) : 0
1: , ( ), , , , ,12
L
A x
L
L
u u
l l
l u
Min MC q wdx
Subject to
E A w v qv dx
Adx V
x A A
x A A
Data L q x E V A Ab
=
− =
−
−
−
=
We assume here that only t(x) is variable.
( )I x A=
2
1; 3
12b
= =
Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material where the depth of the beam is the design variable.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 10
13
( )0
*
0
2 *
: 0
: , ( ), , ,12
L
A x
L
d
d
Min V Adx
Subject to
MMdx
E A
tData L M(x),M x E
=
− =
=
Minimize the volume of a statically determinate beam with a deflection constraint in its span.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 11
14
( )
( )
( )0
*
0
2
( ) : 0
( ) : 0
: 0
:12
L
A x
d d
L
*d
Min V Adx
Subject to
x E Aw q
x E Av q
E Aw v dx
tData L,q(x),q (x),E, = ,Δ
=
− =
− =
− =
Minimize the volume of material of a beam (statically determinate or indeterminate) for a deflection constraint in its span.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 12
15
( )
( )
( )0
*
0
2 *
0
2 *
( ) : 0
( ) : 0
: 0
1: 0
2
: ,12
L
A x
d d
L
L
*d
Min V Adx
Subject to
x E Aw q
x E Av q
E Aw v dx
E Aw dx SE
tData L,q(x),q (x), = ,E,Δ SE
=
− =
− =
− =
− =
Minimize the volume of material of a beam (statically determinate or indeterminate) for a deflection constraint in its span with an upper bound on the strain energy.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 13
16
( )
( )0
0
*
0
2 *
: 0
: 0
( ) : 0
( ) : 0
: , ( ), , ,12
L
A x
L
L
u u
l l
l u
Min MC q wdx
Subject to
E Aw v qv dx
Adx V
x w w
x w w
tData L q x E V ,w ,w
=
− =
−
−
−
=
Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material and upper and lower bound constraints on the transverse displacement.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 14
17
( )
( )0
0
*
0
2 *
: 0
: 0
( ) : 0
( ) : 0
: , ( ), , , , ,12
L
A x
L
L
u t
l c
t c
Min MC q wdx
Subject to
E Aw v qv dx
Adx V
x E w
x E w
tData L q x E V
=
− =
−
−
−
=
Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material and upper and lower bound constraints on the stress.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 15
18
( )
q( )0
*
0
2 *
( ) : 0
: 0
: , ( ), , ,12
L
x
L
Max MC q wdx
Subject to
x E Aw q
p dx W
tData L A x E W
=
− =
−
=
Determine the world load distribution of a beam. Note that the upper bound on the overall load is specified.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 16
19
( )
2
( )0
*
0
2 *
( ) : 0
: 0
: ,q( ), , ,12
L
A x
L
Min MC q w dx
Subject to
x E Aw q
Adx V
tData L x E V
=
− =
−
=
A general objective function for a beam problem.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
Problem 17
20
0
3
*
0
*
1( ) : 0
12
: 0
: ,q( ), ,
L
b(x),t(x)
L
Min MC q wdx
Subject to
x Ebt Aw q
Adx V
Data L x E V
=
− =
−
Minimize the mean compliance of a beam for given volume of material by varying both breadth and depth of the rectangular cross-section of the beam.
-
Structural Optimization: Size, Shape, and TopologyG. K. Ananthasuresh, IISc
The end note
21
ThanksPra
ctic
e p
rob
lem
s in
cal
culu
s o
f v
aria
tio
ns
Constraints on displacements and strains (stresses) can be imposed.
Transversely deforming beam is the second simplest structural optimization problem. Either breadth or depth can be varied; both can be varied too.
Mean compliance and strain energy are measures of stiffness.Volume of material used is a cost-measure.Objective function and functional constraint can be interchanged without affecting the nature of the solution.
Constraints can also be imposed on profile of the area of cross-section.
Equilibrium equation can be posed in strong or weak form without changing the nature of the solution.