module 1 lumbar spine. history, persistent history, pm history, family history chief complaint –...

36
MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine

Upload: ada-gray

Post on 18-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

MODULE 1

Lumbar Spine

Page 2: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

• History, persistent history, PM history, family history • Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T• Physical examination – orthopedic, neurological• Differential diagnosis• Tests to limit differential diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

When to x-ray

Page 3: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

• Risks versus benefits ratio• Cost versus benefit ratio• When differential diagnosis includes something to: rule in, rule out or monitor a known condition by x-ray

Who gets x-ray

Page 4: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Shoot Series

Page 5: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

ABC’S

• Technical evaluation• Search pattern

Page 6: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Normal Anatomy

Page 7: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Mensuration

• Lumbar spine• Disc height• Hurxthal - measures mid point

of each endplate easy can’t account for

extension or flexionmalposition

distance

Page 8: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 9: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Farfan

Anterior height ratio (AHR) = Anterior height Diameter

Posterior height ratio (PHR) = Posterior height Diameter

DH = AHR PHR

More complex posterior anterior Research use height D height

Page 10: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 11: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Both Measurements

• Great variation exists• Rotation >40o or lateral flexion >20o

leads to unreliable results

Page 12: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Decrease disc height causes

• Degeneration • Surgery (i.e. discectomy)• Chemonucleolysis• Infection• Congenital hypoplasia

Page 13: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Poor correlation between loss of disc height and pain.

Page 14: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

IVD Angles• Lines tangential to the endplates extend until intersection• Measuring angle• Little predictability• Alterations may occur Antalgia Muscle imbalance Poor posture Early DJD Facet syndrome may increase angle Disc herniation may decrease angle

Page 15: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 16: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Lumbar Lordosis

• Top of L1 and S1 used or bottom of L5• Draw perpendicular to tangential lines• Measure angle of intersection• Great variety• 50o-60o average

Page 17: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 18: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Lumbosacral lordosis angle and sacral inclination not useful.

Page 19: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Lumbosacral Angle(Sacral base angle, Ferguson’s angle)

• Tangential sacral base• Horizontal line• Measure angle of intersection• 41o +/- 7o

It has been suggested that increased angle leads to increased shearing and compressive forces at the facets

No increase in anterolisthesis noted

Page 20: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Static Vertebral Malpositions

• Flexion• Extension• Lateral flexion• Rotation• Anterolisthesis• Retrolisthesis• Laterolisthesis

Page 21: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 22: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Lumbar Gravity Line (Ferguson’s, weight bearing, Ferguson’s gravity)

• Center of L3• Plumb line• Should intersect anterior sacral margin +/- 10mm

Page 23: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 24: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

McNab’s Line

• High number’s of asymptomatic patients make this line’s usefulness doubtful•Was originally used on recumbent films weight bearing may alter utility

Page 25: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 26: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Hadley’s Curve

• AP and obliques views used• Interuption of the line may indicate: Rostral/caudal migration Extension malposition Rotational malposition

Page 27: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 28: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 29: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

VanAkkerveeken and flexion and extension have been largely replaced by the more sensitive comp/distraction study.

Page 30: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Lateral Bending Study

• May suggest ligament laxity and/or muscle spasm• Poor correlation between this and clinical picture

Page 31: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 32: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Meyerding

• Replaced by the more useful percentage method

• Anteriority sacral base length = % of antero

Page 33: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 34: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Ullmann’s Line

• Tangential to sacral base• Perpendicular to and coincide with anterior sacral prominence

• L5 should be at or posterior to line, if anterior, it represents anterolisthesis

Note: decreased lordosis may produce false positive

Page 35: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,
Page 36: MODULE 1 Lumbar Spine. History, persistent history, PM history, family history Chief Complaint – O, P, P, Q, R, S, T Physical examination – orthopedic,

Interpediculate Distribution and Eisenstein’s and canal body ratio (unreliable) measure for central canal stenosis

Small numbers are suggestive only CT, MR for definitive diagnosis