module1 c - rajesh sir
DESCRIPTION
GCE KannurTRANSCRIPT
Structural Analysis - II
Indeterminate structures;Indeterminate structures;Force method of analysis
Dr. Rajesh K. N.Assistant Professor in Civil EngineeringAssistant Professor in Civil EngineeringGovt. College of Engineering, Kannur
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1
Module IModule IStatically and kinematically indeterminate structures
• Degree of static indeterminacy, Degree of kinematic indeterminacy, Force and displacement method of analysis
Force method of analysis
• Method of consistent deformation-Analysis of fixed and i b
Force method of analysis
continuous beams
• Clapeyron’s theorem of three moments-Analysis of fixed and continuous beams
• Principle of minimum strain energy-Castigliano’s second theorem-
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2
p gy gAnalysis of beams, plane trusses and plane frames.
Types of Framed Structures• a. Beams: may support bending moment, shear force and axial force
yp
• b. Plane trusses: hinge joints; In addition to axial forces, a member CAN have bending moments and shear forces if it has
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3
loads directly acting on them, in addition to joint loads
• c. Space trusses: hinge joints; any couple acting on a member should have moment vector perpendicular to the axis of the member, since a truss member is incapable of supporting a twisting momentg
• d. Plane frames: Joints are rigid; all forces in the plane of the frame, all couples normal to the plane of the frame
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
4
• e Grids: all forces normal to the plane of the grid all couples • e. Grids: all forces normal to the plane of the grid, all couples in the plane of the grid (includes bending and torsion)
• f. Space frames: most general framed structure; may support bending moment, shear force, axial force and torsion
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
5
g , ,
Deformations in Framed Structures
, ,x y zT M MThree couples: , ,x y zN V VThree forces:
•Significant deformations in framed structures:•Significant deformations in framed structures:
Structure Significant deformationsStructure Significant deformationsBeams flexuralPlane trusses axialSpace trusses axialPlane frames flexural and axialGrids flexural and torsionalSpace frames axial, flexural and torsional
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
6
Types of deformations in framed structures b) axial c) shearing d) flexural e) torsional
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
7
b) axial c) shearing d) flexural e) torsional
Equilibrium•Resultant of all actions (a force, a couple or both) must vanish for static equilibrium
q
0F∑ 0F∑ ∑
•Resultant force vector must be zero; resultant moment vector must be zero
0xF =∑ 0yF =∑ 0zF =∑0xM =∑ 0yM =∑ 0zM =∑∑ y∑ ∑
•For 2 dimensional problems (forces are in one plane and
0F =∑ 0F =∑ 0M =∑
•For 2-dimensional problems (forces are in one plane and couples have vectors normal to the plane),
0xF =∑ 0yF =∑ 0zM =∑
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
8
Compatibility
•Compatibility conditions: Conditions of continuity of p y ydisplacements throughout the structure
•Eg: at a rigid connection between two members, the g g ,displacements (translations and rotations) of both members must be the same
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
9
Indeterminate Structures
Force method and Displacement method
• Force method (Flexibility method)
• Actions are the primary unknowns
St ti i d t i f k ti th • Static indeterminacy: excess of unknown actions than the available number of equations of static equilibrium
• Displacement method (Stiffness method)
• Displacements of the joints are the primary unknowns
• Kinematic indeterminacy: number of independent
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Kinematic indeterminacy: number of independent translations and rotations
Static indeterminacy
• Beam:
• Static indeterminacy = Reaction components number of eqns • Static indeterminacy = Reaction components - number of eqns available 3E R= −
• Examples: • Examples:
• Single span beam with both ends hinged with inclined l d loads • Continuous beam• Propped cantilever• Fixed beam
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Degree of Static Structure Degree of Static Indeterminacy
Structure
0
1
3
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
12
Degree of Static I d t iStructure
0
Indeterminacy
0
1
55
2
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Rigid frame (Plane): g ( )
• External indeterminacy = Reaction components - number of eqns available 3E R= −available
• Internal indeterminacy = 3 × closed frames
3E R
3I a=• Internal indeterminacy = 3 × closed frames 3I a=
• Total indeterminacy = External indeterminacy + Internal indeterminacy
( )3 3T E I R a= + = − +
• Note: An internal hinge will provide an additional eqn
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
14
Example 1 Example 2p p
( )3 3T E I R a= + = − +( )3 3T E I R a= + = − + ( )( )3 3 3 3 2 12= × − + × =( )2 2 3 3 0 1= × − + × =
Example 3 Example 4
( )( )
3 3T E I R a= + = − + ( )( )
3 3T E I R a= + = − +
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
( )3 2 3 3 3 12= × − + × = ( )4 3 3 3 4 21= × − + × =
Degree of Static I d t iStructure Indeterminacy
3
63
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
16
Degree of Static I d t iStructure Indeterminacy
2
1
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• Rigid frame (Space): g ( p )
• External indeterminacy = Reaction components - number of eqns available 6E R= −available
• Internal indeterminacy = 6 × closed frames
6E R
Example 1
( )( )
6 6T E I R a= + = − +
( )4 6 6 6 1 24= × − + × =
If i l d f ti l t d t ti i d t i i t If axial deformations are neglected, static indeterminacy is not affected since the same number of actions still exist in the structure
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Plane truss (general):
External indeterminacy = Reaction components - number of eqns available 3E R= −
Minimum 3 members and 3 joints. A dditi l j i t i 2 dditi l b
( )3 2 3 2 3m j j= + − = −Hence, number of members for stability,
Any additional joint requires 2 additional members.
( )2 3I m j= − −Hence, internal indeterminacy,
Total (Internal and external) indeterminacyTotal (Internal and external) indeterminacy
( )3 2 32
T E I R m jm R j
= + = − + − −
= + − 2m R j+
• m: number of members• R : number of reaction components
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
• j : number of joints• Note: Internal hinge will provide additional eqn
E l 1Example 1
2 9 3 2 6 0T m R j= + − = + − × =
3 3 3 0E R= − = − =
0I T E= − =
Example 22 15 4 2 8 3T R
p2 15 4 2 8 3T m R j= + − = + − × =
3 4 3 1E R= − = − =
2I T E= − =
Example 3 2 6 4 2 5 0T m R j= + − = + − × =
( ) 3 1 4 4 Hinge at 0 AE R= − + = − =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
( )0I T E= − =
Example 4 2 7 3 2 5 0T m R j= + − = + − × =Example 4 2 7 3 2 5 0T m R j+ +
3 3 3 0E R= − = − =
0I T E 0I T E= − =
2 6 4 2 4 2T m R j= + − = + − × =
3 4 3 1E R= = =
Example 5
3 4 3 1E R= − = − =
1I T E= − =
2 11 3 2 6 2T m R j= + − = + − × =Example 6
3 3 3 0E R= − = − =
2I T E= − =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2I T E= =
• Wall or roof attached pin jointed plane truss (Exception to the • Wall or roof attached pin jointed plane truss (Exception to the above general case):
• Internal indeterminacy 2I m j= −
• External indeterminacy = 0 (Since, once the member forces are determined, reactions are determinable)
Example 1 Example 3Example 2Example 1 Example 3p
26 2 3 0
T I m j= = −= − × =
25 2 1 3
T I m j= = −= − × =2
7 2 3 1T I m j= = −= × =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
22
7 2 3 1= − × =
• Space Truss:
External indeterminacy = Reaction components - number of eqns available
Minimum 6 members and 4 joints
6E R= −
( )6 3 4 3 6m j j= + − = −Hence, number of members for stability,
Minimum 6 members and 4 joints. Any additional joint requires 3 additional members.
( )6 3 4 3 6m j j+Hence, number of members for stability,
( )3 6I m j= − −Hence, internal indeterminacy,
Total (Internal and external) indeterminacy
( )6 3 6T E I R m j= + = − + − −
3m R j= + −
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Example
3T m R j= +Total (Internal and external) indeterminacy 3T m R j= + −Total (Internal and external) indeterminacy
12 9 3 6 3T∴ = + − × =
6 9 6 3E R= − = − =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Kinematic indeterminacyKinematic indeterminacy
• joints: where members meet, supports, free ends• joints undergo translations or rotations
•in some cases joint displacements will be known, from the restraint conditions•the unknown joint displacements are the kinematically •the unknown joint displacements are the kinematically indeterminate quantities
odegree of kinematic indeterminacy: number of degrees of f dfreedom
Two types of DOF
• Nodal type DOFJ i DOF
Two types of DOF
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
25
• Joint type DOF
• degree of kinematic indeterminacy (degrees of freedom) is d fi d defined as:
• the number of independent translations and rotations in a structure.
DOF = 1DOF = 2
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
DOF 2
• in a truss the joint rotation is not regarded as a degree of • in a truss, the joint rotation is not regarded as a degree of freedom. joint rotations do not have any physical significance as they have no effects in the members of the truss
• in a frame, degrees of freedom due to axial deformations can be neglected
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Kinematic Degree f F dStructure of Freedom
2
11
22
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Kinematic Degree f F dStructure of Freedom
4
If the effect of the cantilever portion is considered as a joint load at If the effect of the cantilever portion is considered as a joint load at the roller support on the far right, kinematic indeterminacy can be taken as 2.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Kinematic Degree f F dStructure of Freedom
2
3
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Kinematic Degree f F dStructure of Freedom
6
2
5
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Method of Consistent DeformationIllustration of the method
Problem
Released structure
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
32
Released structure
D fl ti f l d
45wLΔ
Deflection of released structure due to actual loads
384B EIΔ =
C Deflection of released structure due to redundant applied as a ppload
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
33
3BR LDeflection due o
48t B
BR L
IR
E=
3BR L
Δ48
BB EI
Δ =
4 35 BwL R L
Compatibility condition (or equation of superposition or equation of geometry) 5
384 48BwL R L
EI EI=
5B
wLR∴ =8B
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
34
•A general approach (applying consistent sign convention for loads and displacements):
RA l it l d di t BR•Apply unit load corresponding to
3
48BLEI
δ =Let the displacement due to unit load be
BR B BR δDisplacement due to is
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
35
445384B
wLEI
Δ = − (Negative, since deflection is downward)
0B B BR δΔ + = (Compatibility condition)
BB
B
RδΔ
= − 58BwLR∴ =
Bδ 8
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
36
Example 1: Propped cantilever
AM
PP
A
2l 2l2l 2lA B
AV BVChoose VB as the redundant
P
AM
2l 2l
AV
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
37Released structure
Find deflection at B of the released structure
31 2 5PL l l l Pl− −⎛ ⎞Δ = + =⎜ ⎟Pl− . . .2 2 2 2 3 2 48B EI EI
Δ = + =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠2
PlEI
M diagramEIEI
Apply unit load on released structure corresponding to VApply unit load on released structure corresponding to VBand find deflection at B
3
3BlEI
δ =
1l
3EI
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
38
0R δΔ35 3 5B Pl EI PR −Δ
= = =0B B BR δΔ + = 3.48 16B
B
REI lδ
= = =
+ve sign indicates that VB is in the same direction of the unit load.i.e., in the upward direction.
P
2l 2l
5 32 16 16APl Pl PlM = − =Other reactions
2l 2l
516P11
16P
16
532Pl
Bending moment diagram
3Pl
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3916
−
Example 2: Continuous beam10kN
A2m 2m
A B 4m C
10kN
A B C
V VVAV CVBV
Choose VB as the redundant
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
40
10kN2 6
ABΔ C
2m 6mB
Released structure2.5 kN7.5 kN
15EI
10EI
1 251 358 6+⎛ ⎞
A B CEI EI
4 m
Conjugate beam of the released structure (to find ∆ )
( )1 25
0.5 15 8 35EI EI=× × −
1 358 6 80.5 15 83EI EI+⎛ ⎞ ÷ =× × ×⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Conjugate beam of the released structure (to find ∆B)
1 73.333425 4 0 5 10 4⎛ ⎞∴Δ ⎜ ⎟ (numerically)
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN41
25 4 0.5 10 43B EI EI
⎛ ⎞∴Δ = =× − × × ×⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
(numerically)
1kN1kN
4mA B 4m C4m 4m
Released structure with unit load corresponding to V (to find δ )Released structure with unit load corresponding to VB (to find δB)
3 38 10.667B
lδ = = = (numerically) (di i i ∆ i d d )48 48B EI EI EI
δ
0R δΔ + 73.333 6 875B EIR kN−Δ −
(direction is same as ∆B i.e., downwards)
0B B BR δΔ + = . 6.87510.667
BB
B
R kNmEIδ
= = = −
i i di t th t V i i th it di ti f th it l d-ve sign indicates that VB is in the opposite direction of the unit load.i.e., in the upward direction.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
42
10kNOther reactions
10kN
A B CB C
4.063AV kN= 0.938CV kN=6.875 kNA
Bending moment diagramg g
AB
C
8.122 kNm
A C3.752 kNm−
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Example 3A:
2m3mCD
30kNBEI is constant
2m
DMD
A
2m6mC
DHD
30kNB
VD
2mB
HA Choose H as the redundant
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
44A
Choose HA as the redundant
D CD
To find ∆HA and δHA (using unit load method)
10kN2m3m
CD 2m6m
B
C
2mA
B 2mA
B1kNE=2x105N/mm2
I= 2x108mm4
Portion Origin Limits M m Mm m2
AB A 0-2 0 x 0 x2AB A 0 2 0 x 0 xBC A 2-4 -10(x-2) x -10x2+20x x2
CD A 0 3 20 4 80 16
( ) ( )4 3
21 110 20 80Mmdx x x dx dxΔ = = + +∫ ∫ ∫
CD A 0-3 -20 4 -80 16
( ) ( )2 0
10 20 80HA x x dx dxEI EI EI
Δ = = − + + −∫ ∫ ∫
[ ]43
321 1x⎡ ⎤ 306 67−
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ ]320
2
1 110 10 803HAx x x
EI EI⎡ ⎤
Δ = − + + −⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
306.67EI
−=
4 32 2 4 33 69 3316⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤4 32 2
0 0
16HA
m dx x dx dxEI EI EI
δ = = +∫ ∫ ∫33
00
69.33163
xxEIEIEI
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= + =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
0HA A HAH δΔ + =306.67 4.4.
69 33
32B
AEIH
EIkN
δ−Δ
= = =HA A HA 69.33B EIδ
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
46
Example 3B: 2ICD
2m6mCD
30kN
2m
IB
M
2m
A
26m
2IC
DHD
MD A
30kN
2m6m
IVD
Choose H as the redundant2m
B
H
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Choose HA as the redundant
A
HA
2ID
2ICD
To find ∆HA and δHA (using unit load method)
30kN2m6m
I
CD 2m6m
I B
C
2mA
B 2mA
B1kNE=2x105N/mm2
I= 2x108mm4
Portion Origin Limits M m Mm m2
AB A 0-2 0 x 0 x2
BC A 2-4 -30(x-2) x -30x2+60x x2
CD A 0-6 -60 4 -240 16
( ) ( )4 6
21 130 60 240Mmdx x x dx dxΔ = = + +∫ ∫ ∫
CD A 0 6 60 4 240 16
( ) ( )2 0
30 60 2402HA x x dx dx
EI EI EIΔ = = − + + −∫ ∫ ∫
[ ]4 63 21 110 30 240⎡ ⎤Δ 920−
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
[ ]63 202
1 110 30 2402HA x x x
EI EI⎡ ⎤Δ = − + + −⎣ ⎦
920EI−
=
4 62 2 16d4 63 69 3338x⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤2 2
0 0
162HA
m dx x dx dxEI EI EI
δ = = +∫ ∫ ∫3
00
69.33383
xxEIEIEI
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤= + =⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
0H δΔ + =920. 13.269
69 333HA
AEIH kN
EIδ−Δ
= = =0HA A HAH δΔ + = 69.333AHA EIδ
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Example 4: Two or more redundants
60kN
A B C
80kN 50kND
3m 3mA B C
3m 3m 3m 3m
60kN 80kN 50kN
3m 3mA B C D
3m 3m 3m 3m
Choose VB and Vc as the redundant
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
50
60kN 80kN 50kN
A B C D
BΔ CΔB C
1kN
A B Dδ
C
BBδ CBδ
1kN
A B D
δ
C
BCδCCδ
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
0B B BB C BCV Vδ δΔ + + = 0C B CB C CCV Vδ δΔ + + =
60kN
A B C
80kN 50kNDA B
3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m
A B C D150kNm
15
120kNm 60kNm
3m 15m525kN825kN
240kNm 240kNm
A B C D360kNm
9 9
240kNm 240kNm
9 m 9m1620kN1620kN
A B C D125kNm100kNm
50kNm
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
15m 3m687.5kN437.5kN
3420 8280 2325 14025BEIΔ = + + = 2790 8280 2850 13920CEIΔ = + + =
D2kNm4kNmA
B CD
12 m6m16kN20kN
2kNm
16kN20kN
96BBEIδ = 84CBEIδ =
A D2kNm 4kNmA
B CD
12m6m
20kN16kN
2kNm
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
84BCEIδ =96CCEIδ =
0V Vδ δΔ + + = 14025 96 84 0B CV V⇒ + + =0B B BB C BCV Vδ δΔ + + =
0C B CB C CCV Vδ δΔ + + =
14025 96 84 0B CV V⇒ + +
13920 84 96 0B CV V⇒ + + =C B CB C CC B C
82BV kN= − 73.25CV kN= −
( )82BV kN= ↑ ( )73.25CV kN= ↑
( )19.25AV kN= ↑ ( )15.5DV kN= ↑
( )B ( )C
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Clapeyron’s theorem of three moments1. Uniform loading
w kN m w kN m1w kN m
1 1l IA B C
2w kN m
2 2l I
M
1 1,l I 2 2,l I
1
AMEI
B C
1
BMEI
2
BMEI
2
CMEI
A B CM/EI diagram for joint moments
+
B C
21 1
18w lEI
22 2
28w lEI
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
A B C
M/EI diagram for simple beam moments
To find slopes at B using Conjugate Beam Method:
21 1 2 2M l l M l l w l l⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤
From span AB:
1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1
1 1 1
1 1 2 2. . . . . . .2 3 2 3 3 8 2
A BB
M l l M l l w l llV lEI EI EI
⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤+= + ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
31 1 1 1
11 1 16 3 24
A BB BA
M l M l w lVEI EI EI
θ⇒ = + + =
From span BC:
22 2 2 2 2 2 2
22 22 2 2
1 1 2 2. . . . . . .2 3 2 3 3 8 2
B CB
M l l M l l w l llV lEI EI EI
⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤+= + ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ ⎦
32 2 2 2
2 3 6 24B C
B BCM l M l w lV
EI EI EIθ⇒ = + + =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2 2 23 6 24EI EI EI
BAθ
A B C
BA
BCθ
Deflected shape
0BA BC BA BCθ θ θ θ+ = ⇒ = −
332 2 2 21 1 1 1
3 6 246 3 24B CA B M l M l w lM l M l w l
EI EI EIEI EI EI⎛ ⎞
+ +⇒ + + = − ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠2 2 21 1 1 3 6 246 3 24 EI EI EIEI EI EI ⎝ ⎠
3 31 2l lM l M l w l w l⎛ ⎞1 21 2 1 1 2 2
1 21 2 1 2
24 4
A CB
l lM l M l w l w lMEI EIEI EI EI EI
⎛ ⎞+⇒ + + = − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
2. General loadingg1a
2a
AB
C
x x1x 2x
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 16 3A B
BAM l M l a x
EI EI EI lθ = + +
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 23 6B C
BCM l M l a x
EI EI EI lθ = + +
2 2 2 2
1 21 2 1 1 2 26 62A Cl lM l M l a x a xM ⎛ ⎞+⇒ + + = − −⎜ ⎟BA BCθ θ= −
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1 21 2 1 1 2 2
2 BMEI EIEI EI EI l EI l
+⇒ + + = − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
BA BCθ θ
2. General loading with support settlement1a
2a ;A B
B C
δ δδ δ
><
AB
C
x x1x 2x
M l M l δ δ1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 16 3A B A B
BAM l M l a x
EI EI EI l lδ δθ −
= + + +2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2 23 6B C C B
BCM l M l a x
EI EI EI l lδ δθ −
= + + +
BA BCθ θ= −
( ) ( )1 21 2 1 1 2 2
1 21 2 1 1 2 2 1 2
6 66 62 A B C BA CB
l lM l M l a x a xMEI EIEI EI EI l EI l l l
δ δ δ δ− −⎛ ⎞+⇒ + + = − − − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1 21 2 1 1 2 2 1 2l l l l⎝ ⎠
Example 1:
20kN m 20kN m
4 mA B C
4 m
EI is constant
3 3l lM l M l l l⎛ ⎞
1 2l l=
3 31 21 2 1 1 2 2
1 21 2 1 2
24 4
A CB
l lM l M l w l w lMEI EIEI EI EI EI
⎛ ⎞++ + = − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
1 2w w=2244BwlM = −
0A CM M= = 0A CM M
2
8BwlM∴ = −
220 4 408
kNm×= − = −
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
8 8
Example 2:W
lA B Cl l D
EI is constant
EI EI
Span ABC0M =
EI is constant
3 3l lM l M l l l⎛ ⎞
1 2l l= 1 2EI EI= 0AM =
3 31 21 2 1 1 2 2
1 21 2 1 2
24 4
A CB
l lM l M l w l w lMEI EIEI EI EI EI
⎛ ⎞++ + = − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
4 0A B CM M M⇒ + + =
4 0M M⇒ + = ( )1
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
4 0B CM M⇒ + = ( )1
Wl1 Wla l=
lA B Cl l D
Span BCD4WlEI
2
2
. .2 4
2
a l
lx
=
=0M
( ) 1 1 2 26 64 a x a xl M M M+ +
2 20DM =
( )2 14 6 lWll M M l⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟
( ) 1 1 2 24B C Dl M M Ml l
+ + = − −
( )2 4 6 . .22 4B Cl M M l⎛ ⎞+ = − ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
34 WlM M ( )248B CM M+ = − ( )2
Wl− WlM
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
10CWlM = 40BM =( ) ( )&1 2
40Wl
5Wl
A B C40
10Wl−
D5
10
Bending moment diagram
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
63
Example 3: 20kN m 20kN mp
6mA B C8mEI is constant
20kN m 20kN m
6mA B C8mImaginary
span A’Aspan A A
Span A’AB1
2
020
ww kN m
== ' 0AM = 1 2EI EI=
Span A AB
3 31 2' 1 2 1 1 2 22A B
A
l lM l M l w l w lMEI EI
⎛ ⎞++ + = − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
1 21 2 1 24 4A EI EIEI EI EI EI⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
320 6×20 62 6 64A BM M ×
× + × = −
2 180M M+ ( )12 180A BM M+ = −
Span ABC
( )1
1 2 20w w kN m= =3 31 21 2 1 1 2 2
1 21 2 1 2
24 4
A CB
l lM l M l w l w lMEI EIEI EI EI EI
⎛ ⎞++ + = − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
0CM =1 21 2 1 2⎝ ⎠
3 320 6 20 86 2 144 4A BM M × ×
+ × = − −4 4
3 14 1820A BM M+ = − ( )2
( ) ( )&1 2 28AM kNm= − 124BM kNm= −
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Example 4 (Support settlement):
226320EI kN 87δ δEI is constant
20kN m 20kN m20kN m
226320EI kNm= 87B C mmδ δ= =EI is constant
6mA DC 3mB3m
EI EI EI= =0MSpan ABC
1 2EI EI EI= =0AM =
( ) ( )3 31 21 2 1 1 2 2 66 C BA BA Cl lM l M l w l w l δ δδ δ −−⎛ ⎞ ( ) ( )1 21 2 1 1 2 2
1 21 2 1 2 1 2
662
4 4C BA BA C
B
l lM l M l w l w lMEI EIEI EI EI EI l l
δ δδ δ⎛ ⎞++ + = − − − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( ) ( )3 31 20 3 20 6 6 6 00.08718 626320 4 26320 4 26320 3 6B CM M × × ×−+ = − − − −
× ×
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3 560.78B CM M+ = ( )1
Span BCD0DM =
( ) ( )3 31 21 2 1 1 2 2 6 6
24 4
B C D CB DC
l lM l M l w l w lMEI EIEI EI EI EI l l
δ δ δ δ− −⎛ ⎞++ + = − − − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
D
1 21 2 1 2 1 24 4EI EIEI EI EI EI l l⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( ) ( )3 31 20 6 20 3 6 0 6 0.0876 18M M × × × −+( )6 1826320 4 26320 4 26320 6 3B CM M+ = − − − −
× ×
3 560.78B CM M+ = ( )2
140.195BM kNm= 140.195CM kNm=
Alternatively, from symmetry, B CM M=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
673 560.78B CM M+ = 4 560.78 140.195B BM M kNm⇒ = ⇒ =
Examples 5 (Fixed Beam) xa p es 5 ( xed ea )
P
A BC
lA
P
A BC
A′ B′lAA′ B
Imaginary span A’A
Imaginary span BB’span A A span BB
1 21 2 1 1 2 26 62A Cl lM l M l a x a xM ⎛ ⎞++ +⎜ ⎟
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
68
1 21 2 1 1 2 2
1 21 2 1 1 2 2
2A CBM
EI EIEI EI EI l EI l++ + = − −⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Span A’AB1 l
' 0AM =4PlEI
21 . .2 4
Pla l
l
=
1 2EI EI=4EI
2 2lx =A B
6Pl6216A BPlM M⇒ + = −
S ABB’
( )1
' 0BM = 1 2EI EI=
Span ABB’2
1 1,8 2
Pl la x= =8 2
6216A BPlM M⇒ + = − ( )2
16
( ) ( )&1 2 A BPlM M= = −
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
69
( ) ( )&1 2 8A BM M
Examples 6 (Fixed Beam)
w
xa p es 6 ( xed ea )
lA B
CC
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
70
ENERGY PRINCIPLES BASED ON DISPLACEMENT FIELDENERGY PRINCIPLES BASED ON DISPLACEMENT FIELD
Principle of Minimum Total Potential
Castigliano’sTheorem (Part I)Total Potential
Energy (PMTPE)Theorem (Part I)
alternative forms ofalternative forms of
Principle of Stationary TotalPrinciple of Stationary TotalPotential Energy (PSTPE)
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
71
Principle of Stationary Total Potential Energy (PSTPE)p y gy ( )
When the displacement field in a loaded elastic structure is given all d bit t b ti i t i i tibilit dsmall and arbitrary perturbation, maintaining compatibility and
without disturbing the associated force field, then the first variationof the total potential energy is equal to zero, if the forces are in astate of static equilibrium.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
72
Alternative form of Principle of Stationary Total Potential EnergyAlternative form of Principle of Stationary Total Potential Energy(PSTPE)
The total potential energy π in a loaded elastic structure expressed as afunction of n independent displacements D1, D2, … Dn in acompatible displacement field must be rendered stationary with thecompatible displacement field must be rendered stationary, with thepartial derivative of π with respect to every Dj being equal to zero, ifthe associated force field is to be in a state of static equilibrium.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Principle of Minimum Total Potential Energy (PMTPE)Principle of Minimum Total Potential Energy (PMTPE)
When the displacement field in a loaded linear elastic structure is givena small and arbitrary perturbation, maintaining compatibility andwithout disturbing the associated force field, then the first variationof the total potential energy is equal to zero, if the forces are in ap gy q ,state of static equilibrium.
Castigliano’s Theorem (Part I)
If the strain energy, U, in an elastic structure, subject to a system ofexternal forces in static equilibrium, can be expressed as a functionq , pof n independent displacements D1, D2, … Dn satisfyingcompatibility, then the partial derivative of U with respect to everyDj will be equal to the value of the conjugate force, Fj.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
74
Dj will be equal to the value of the conjugate force, Fj.
ENERGY PRINCIPLES BASED ON FORCE FIELDENERGY PRINCIPLES BASED ON FORCE FIELD
Principle of Minimum Total Complementary Potential
Castigliano’sTheorem (Part II)
Complementary Potential Energy (PMTCPE)
Theorem of LeastWork
alternative forms of
Principle of StationaryPrinciple of StationaryComplementary Total PotentialEnergy (PSCTPE)
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Principle of Stationary Total Complementary Potential EnergyPrinciple of Stationary Total Complementary Potential Energy(PSTCPE)
When the force field in a loaded elastic structure is given a small andarbitrary perturbation, maintaining equilibrium compatibility andwithout disturbing the associated displacement field, then the firstg p ,variation of the total complementary potential energy is equal tozero, if the displacements satisfy compatibility.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN76
Alternative form of Principle of Stationary Total ComplementaryPotential Energy (PSTCPE)Potential Energy (PSTCPE)
The total complementary potential energy π* in a loaded elasticp y p gystructure expressed as a function of n independent forces F1, F2, …Fn in a statically admissible force field must be rendered stationary,with the partial derivative of π* with respect to every Fj being equalw t t e pa t a de vat ve o w t espect to eve y j be g equato zero, if the associated displacement field is to satisfycompatibility.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Principle of Minimum Total Complementary Potential EnergyPrinciple of Minimum Total Complementary Potential Energy(PMTCPE)
When the force field in a loaded linear elastic structure is given a smalland arbitrary perturbation, maintaining equilibrium compatibilityand without disturbing the associated displacement field, then theg p ,first variation of the total complementary potential energy is equalto zero, if the displacement satisfy compatibility.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
78
Castigliano’s Theorem (Part II)Castigliano s Theorem (Part II)
If the complementary strain energy, U*, in an elastic structure, with akinematically admissible displacement field, is expressed as afunction of n independent external forces F1, F2, … Fn satisfyingequilibrium, then the partial derivative of U* with respect to every Fjq , p p y jwill be equal to the value of the conjugate displacement, Dj.
If the behaviour is linear elastic, U* can be replaced by U.
Thus, Castigliano’s Theorem (Part II) can otherwise be stated as:
“If U is the total strain energy in a linear elastic structure due toapplication of external forces F1 F2 F3 F at points A1 A2 A3 Aapplication of external forces F1, F2, F3, … Fn at points A1, A2, A3,…, Anrespectively in the directions AX1, AX2, AX3,…, AXn then thedisplacements at points A1, A2, A3,…, An respectively in the directionsAX AX AX AX ∂U/∂F ∂U/∂F ∂U/∂F ∂U/∂F
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN79
AX1, AX2, AX3,…, AXn are ∂U/∂F1, ∂U/∂F2, ∂U/∂F3,…, ∂U/∂Fnrespectively.”
Proof for Castigliano’s theorem (Part II)Proof for Castigliano s theorem (Part II)
Let x1, x2, x3,… xn be deflections at points A1, A2, A3,… An
due to F F F Fdue to F1, F2, F3,… Fn
Total strain energy, 1 1 2 2 3 31 1 1 12 2 2 2 n nU F x F x F x F x= + + + +… (1)
Let the load F1 alone be increased by 1Fδ
Let 1 2 3, , , nx x x xδ δ δ δ… be the additional deflections at points A1, A2, A3,… An
I i t iIncrease in strain energy,
1 1 1 2 2 3 312 n nU F F x F x F x F xδ δ δ δ δ δ⎛ ⎞= + + + + +⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠…
2⎝ ⎠
1 1 2 2 3 3 n nU F x F x F x F xδ δ δ δ δ= + + + +… , neglecting small quantities.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
80
(2)
( )1 1 2 3, , , nF F F F Fδ+ …Let are acting on the original structure
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )1 1 1 1U U F F F F Fδ δ δ δ δ δ
Total strain energy,
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 31 1 1 12 2 2 2 n n nU+ U F F x x F x x F x x F x xδ δ δ δ δ δ= + + + + + + + + +…
(3)1 1 1 1U F F F F+ + + +(1) 1 1 2 2 3 32 2 2 2 n nU F x F x F x F x= + + + +…(1)
1 1 1 1U F F F Fδ δ δ δ δ⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟(3) (1) 1 1 1 1 2 22 2 2 2 n nU x F F x F x F xδ δ δ δ δ⎛ ⎞= + + + +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
…(3)-(1)
( )2 U x F F x F x F xδ δ δ δ δ= + + + + (4)
1 1 2 2 3 3 n nU F x F x F x F xδ δ δ δ δ= + + + +…(2)
( )1 1 1 1 2 22 n nU x F F x F x F xδ δ δ δ δ= + + + +… (4)
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
811 1U x Fδ δ=(4)-(2)
Uδ U∂1
1
U xF
δδ
=1 1
1
0, UWhen F xF
δ ∂→ =
∂
2 22 3
, , nn
U U USimilarly, x x xF F F∂ ∂ ∂
= = =∂ ∂ ∂
…
For example, in the case of bending,
2
2MU dxEI
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠∫⎝ ⎠
U M M dxF EI F
δ ∂ ∂⎛ ⎞∴ = = ⎜ ⎟∂ ∂⎝ ⎠∫F EI F∂ ∂⎝ ⎠
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
82
Example 1: Using Castigliano’s Theorem, analyse the continuous
w kN/m
p g g , ybeam shown in figure.
AB C
/
LLL
w kN/m
AB C
/
LLRB
L
2BRwL −
2BRwL −
Let RB be the redundant.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
83
B
2wxR⎛ ⎞22
Bx
wxRM xwL⎛ ⎞= −−⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
From A to B,
0Bδ = 0B B
U M M dxR EI R∂ ∂⎛ ⎞⇒ = =⎜ ⎟∂ ∂⎝ ⎠∫
2M xR∂ −
=∂ F th ti AC2BR∂
22M M∂ ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞
For the entire span AC
220 022 2
B
B
M M xR x wxdx dxwLxEI R EI
∂ −⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞∴ = ⇒ =− −⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟∂⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
5B
wLR⇒ =
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
4BR⇒
Example 2: Using Castigliano’s Theorem analyse the frame shown Example 2: Using Castigliano s Theorem, analyse the frame shown in figure.
3 kN/3 kN/m
2mB C
3 kN/m
2mB C
2m1m
D2m
1m
D
A
D
A VD
HD
VD
V
HA
VA
Let HA be the redundant.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Let HA be the redundant.
3 kN/m
2m
1
B CFrom A to B,
x AM H x= −
2m1m
D
AH A
M xH∂
= −∂
A3 AHV = −
AH
From B to C,23⎛ ⎞HA
32DV
3 AHV +
232322
Ax A
xHM x H⎛ ⎞= − −+⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
32
AAV = +
22A
M xH∂
= −∂
F D t C M H x= M x∂
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
From D to C, x AM H x= −A
xH
= −∂
0M M dx∂⎛ ⎞∴ ⎜ ⎟∫ 0A
dxEI H
∴ =⎜ ⎟ ∂⎝ ⎠∫
2 2 1⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞( )( ) ( ) ( )2 2 12
0 0 0
1 3 023 222 2
AA AA
xH x xdx dx dxH x H xx Hx xEI⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞⇒ + + =− −−+ − −− −⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎩ ⎭∫ ∫ ∫
2 2 13 3 3 2 4 2 32 33 03 4A A A A A
AH x x H x H x x H x H xx H x x⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤+ + =+ − − − − + +⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦0 0 03 2 12 2 16 2 3A⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
8 8 8 4A AA AH HH H⎡ ⎤8 8 8 4 03 12 2 8 83 32 12 2
A AA AA A
H HH H H H⎡ ⎤+ + =+ − − − − + +⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
3 3.192
AA
HV kN= + =0.39AH kN=
H
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
3 2.82
AD
HV kN= − =
Example 4: Using Castigliano’s Theorem, analyse the truss shown p g g , yin figure. AE is constant.
CD CD10kN
CD
T10kNCD
3m 3m
T
4mA B
4mA B
T
m
. . 0P LPT AE∂
=∂∑ 6.25T kN=
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Example 4: Do the above problem using the method of consistent Example 4: Do the above problem using the method of consistent deformation.
P kL′
10kN 2
P kLAETk L
′
= −∑
∑
CD
3m
k LAE∑
A B4m B
P P kT′= +
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
Note 1: If there are two internal redundants in a truss in method of Note 1: If there are two internal redundants in a truss, in method of consistent deformation,
2P k L k L k k L′ 21 1 1 2
1 2 0P k L k L k k LT TAE AE AE′
+ + =∑ ∑ ∑
22 1 2 2
1 2 0P k L k k L k LT TAE AE AE′
+ + =∑ ∑ ∑AE AE AE
Note 2: If there are both internal redundants external redundants in a truss, in method of consistent deformation,
21 1 1 0BP k L k L k k LT V
′+ + =∑ ∑ ∑1 0BT V
AE AE AE+ + =∑ ∑ ∑
2P k L k k L k L′
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
21
1 0B B BB
P k L k k L k LT VAE AE AE′
+ + =∑ ∑ ∑
Example 3: Using Castigliano’s Theorem, analyse the pin-jointed h i fi
3m 4m
truss shown in figure.
A B C3m 4m
400A =
A
3m 500A = 400A =
D
80kN
Internally indeterminate to degree 1.
Take force in BD as redundant.
y g
0P LP ∂∑Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
91Assume force in BD is T . . 0P
T AE=
∂∑
cos45 sin 53.13AD CDF F=cos45 sin 53.13AD CDF F
cos45 cos53.13 80AD CDF F T+ + =T
57.14 0.714T−
64.64 0.808T−
sin 53.13 cos53.13 80CD CDF F T+ + =80kN
57.14 0.714CDF T= −
i 53 13( ) sin 53.1357.14 0.714 64.64 0.808cos45ADF T T= − = −
. . 0P LPT AE∂
=∂∑
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )4.243 57.14 0.714 5 64.64 0.80830.714 3 0.808 0500 400 400
T TTE E E− −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞× − + × + × − =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
9249.09T kN∴ =
SummarySummaryStatically and kinematically indeterminate structures
• Degree of static indeterminacy, Degree of kinematic indeterminacy, Force and displacement method of analysis
Force method of analysis
• Method of consistent deformation-Analysis of fixed and continuous beams
• Clapeyron’s theorem of three moments-Analysis of fixed and continuous beams
• Principle of minimum strain energy-Castigliano’s second theorem-Analysis of beams, plane trusses and plane frames.
Dept. of CE, GCE Kannur Dr.RajeshKN
93