mohammad shoyaib, mohammad abdullah-al-wadud and oksam chae image processing lab department of...
TRANSCRIPT
Mohammad Shoyaib, Mohammad Abdullah-Al-Wadud and Oksam Chae
Image Processing Lab
Department of Computer Engineering
Kyung Hee University
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence
22
ⅠⅠ
ⅡⅡ
ⅢⅢ
Motivation and Objective
Proposed System
Available Approaches
Organization of the Presentation
Results
ConclusionⅤⅤ
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
ⅣⅣ
33
Motivation and Objective
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
Applications Depends on Skin detection Face and person detection Gesture recognition Filtering (e.g., pornographic) web content Video surveillance applications etc.
Applications Depends on Skin detection Face and person detection Gesture recognition Filtering (e.g., pornographic) web content Video surveillance applications etc.
Need Improvement
-Can handle most of the imaging conditions
-To support aforementioned applications detection should be performed in real time
Need Improvement
-Can handle most of the imaging conditions
-To support aforementioned applications detection should be performed in real time
Challenges
-Due to several Imaging condition (ethnicity, hairstyle, makeup, illumination, camera characteristics etc.) skin detection becomes challenging
44
Available Techniques
Explicit threshold based methodsThese methods explicitly define the boundaries of the skin cluster in certain color spaces using a set of fixed thresholds
. Parametric methods Single Gaussian, Mixture of Gaussian etc.
Parametric methods Bayesian classifier, self organizing map (SOM), normalized lookup table (LTU) etc are the key ideas in this group.
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
55
Selection of Color Space
Selection of Color Space
Take Final DicisionTake Final DicisionFind Source of
InformationFind Source of
Information
R > 140G > 75B > 35
28 < (R – G) < 10050 < (R – B) < 130R > G and R > B
Convert the measures performance to mass valued
Fuse these mass value to take final decision.
We use RGB color space
Six different Source of Information
Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidance
Proposed Method
050
100150
200250
0
100
200
3000
50
100
150
200
250
300
G
BR
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
66
Finding the Source of Information
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2x 10
6
R
Fre
quen
cy o
f R
Skin
Non-Skin
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16x 10
5
G
Fre
quen
cy o
f G
Skin
Non-Skin
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 10
6
B
Fre
quen
cy o
f B
Skin
Non-Skin
Figure: Distribution of Skin and non-skin clusters in R space
Figure: Distribution of Skin and non-skin clusters in G and B space. Figure: Distribution of Skin and non-skin clusters in G and B space.
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
77
Finding the Source of Information (contd..)
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
50
100
150
200
250
300
R
G
R > 140
G > 75
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
50
100
150
200
250
300
R
B
R>140
B>35
Figure: Plot of distribution of skin colors on different (RG and RB) planes
88
Finding the Source of Information (contd..)
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5x 10
6
R - G
Fre
quen
cy o
f (R
- G
)
Skin
Non-Skin
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
50
100
150
200
250
300
R
G
28<(R-G) < 100
Figure: Clustering based on R – G.(a) Distribution of skin and non-skin colors (b) Coverage of the selected criteria
Figure: Clustering based on R – G.(a) Distribution of skin and non-skin colors (b) Coverage of the selected criteria
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5x 10
6
R - B
Fre
quen
cy o
f (R
- B
)
Skin
Non-Skin
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
50
100
150
200
250
300
R
B
50 < (R – B) <130
Figure: Clustering based on R - B.(a) Distribution of skin and non-skin colors (b) Coverage of the selected criteria
Figure: Clustering based on R - B.(a) Distribution of skin and non-skin colors (b) Coverage of the selected criteria
99
Calculation of Mass Value
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
Si
Si
Si
SiS
i FPTP
FPTPADR
NSi
NSi
NSi
NSiNS
i FPTP
FPTPADR
ADRiS = Absolute Detection Rate for skin
TPiS = Total number of skin pixels correctly classified as skin.
FPiS = Total number of non-skin pixels incorrectly classified as skin.
ADRiNS = Absolute Detection Rate for Nonskin
TPiNS = Total number of non-skin pixels correctly classified as non-skin.
FPiNS = Total number of skin pixels incorrectly classified as non-skin.
ADRiS = Absolute Detection Rate for skin
TPiS = Total number of skin pixels correctly classified as skin.
FPiS = Total number of non-skin pixels incorrectly classified as skin.
ADRiNS = Absolute Detection Rate for Nonskin
TPiNS = Total number of non-skin pixels correctly classified as non-skin.
FPiNS = Total number of skin pixels incorrectly classified as non-skin.
1010
Use of Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidence
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
Measures Skin mass Non-Skin mass
R > 140 0.364339536 0.52453334
G > 75 0.147315460 0.43009921
B > 35 0.079768560 0.42793030
28 < (R – G) < 100
0.547064000 0.64447500
50 < (R – B) < 130
0.755432840 0.54223200
R > G and R > B 0.387888000 0.96809000
R G and R B ({ }) 0.387888m Skin 0})({BR andG R NonSkinm
R G and R B ({ , }) 1 0.387888 0.612112m Skin NonSkin
( ) 0(1)( ) 1
S
m
m S
1
1
... 1
... 1
( )
( )(2)1
( ).
n
n
n
i iS S S i
n
i iS S i
m S
m SK
K m S
1111
Experimental Results
Performance comparison in terms of detection rates
Performance comparison in terms of detection rates
Method CDR (%) FDR (%) CR (%)
Bayesian Classifier 84.601 27.00313 74.41969
MoG Classifier 98.38065 39.78734 64.89256
Proposed Method 90.24991 18.04092 82.97565
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
1212
Experimental Results (contd..)
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
Figure Results different skin detection methods (a) Original Image (b) Detection by Bayesian classifier (c) Detection by MoG classifier
(d) Detection by the proposed approach.
1313
Conclusion
Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method can achieve both the robustness and the stability in skin detectionrunning time will be same as that of the Bayesian classifier.
A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory A Reliable Skin Detection Using Dempster Shafer Theory of Evidenceof Evidence
Questions or Comments