molecular geometry vsepr. molecules in 3d we saw in our last class that to properly address covalent...
TRANSCRIPT
Molecules in 3DMolecules in 3D
We saw in our last class that to properly address covalent bonding we need to use a pictorial approach, so we turn to Lewis Structures.
These are excellent because they give us a great perspective on the electronic arrangement in a molecule.
There is a drawback to a basic Lewis diagram and that is we do not get a sense for how the molecule exits in 3D.
VSEPR TheoryVSEPR Theory
Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory . . . Huh?!?!
Electrons take up space!
Electrons are all negatively charged, therefore they don’t want to be near other electrons.
Electron pairs will repel other electron pairs.
Molecules will orient themselves in 3 dimensions to minimize the interactions of all the electron pairs.
A lone pair takes up more space than a bonding pair (ie they push bonding pairs further away).
Possible 3D ShapesPossible 3D Shapes
# of groups connected to the central atom
# of lone pairs on the central atom
Shape Bond Angles
Example
- - Linear Diatomic HCl
2 0 Linear Triatomic 180 º CO2
2 2 Bent (angular) 104.5 º H2O
3 0 Trigonal Planar 120 º BF3
3 1 Trigonal Pyramidal 107 º NH3
4 0 Tetrahedral 109.5 º CH4, CCl4
5 0 Trigonal Bi-pyramidal
120 º, 90 º
PCl5
6 0 Octahedral 90 º PCl6-
LinearLinear
Bond angle of 180 º minimizes all e- - e- interactions, giving maximum separation between all substituents (things connected to) on the central atom.
TetrahedralTetrahedral
Bond angle of 109.5 º minimizes all e- - e- interactions, giving maximum separation between all substituents (things connected to) on the central atom.
The tetrahedral geometry is very stable and very strong.
DiamondDiamond
Tetrahedral Lattice of Carbon AtomsTetrahedral Lattice of Carbon Atoms
A Diamond is the among the “hardest” substances in the known universe. It gains this strength from its molecular geometry, each carbon has a maximum spacing in the tetrahedral lattice, minimizing any destabilizing interactions.
What about Silicon What about Silicon Dioxide?Dioxide?
Quartz (crystalline SiO2)
Sand (crushed crystalline SiO2)
We know it’s NOT linear triatomic, so what’s the deal?
Structure and Bonding in Silicon DioxideStructure and Bonding in Silicon Dioxide
Every Si centre is tetrahedral
Every O centre is bent
Remarkably strong when a crystalline solid (quartz)
SiOSiO22
Amorphous and Amorphous and EverywhereEverywhere
SiO2 is also common glass, it has a structure much different than Quartz. All of the bonds are the same; however typical glass “looks” like a liquid that has been flash frozen. It’s arrangement is irregular and fluid.
TetrahedralTetrahedral
Bond angle of 109.5 º minimizes all e- - e- interactions, giving maximum separation between all substituents (things connected to) on the central atom.
The tetrahedral geometry is very stable and very strong.
Trigonal Planar and PyramidalTrigonal Planar and Pyramidal
120 º bond angle between each F atom, maximum separation
107 º bond angle between each F atom, maximum separation
Derived from a tetrahedral arrangement, with the “top” atom replaced by a lone pair.
BENTBENT
Only 90 º between H and lone pair.
104.5 º between the 2 H atoms
Water V shaped or BENT Derived from a tetrahedral arrangement, with 2 atoms replaced by lone pairs.
Practice TimePractice TimeWhat are the shapes and bond angles in each of the molecules from yesterday?
HCN, N2H4, CO2, CO, NI3, SCl2, AsCl3, PCl3, CH4, NH4+, HCl, BH3, O3,
CCl4, SiCl4, SiO2, CH2Cl2, IF, AlCl3, CH2O, CH2S
# of groups connected to the central atom
# of lone pairs on the central atom
Shape Bond Angles
Example
- - Linear Diatomic HCl
2 0 Linear Triatomic 180 º CO2
2 2 Bent (angular) 104.5 º H2O
3 0 Trigonal Planar 120 º BF3
3 1 Trigonal Pyramidal
107 º NH3
4 0 Tetrahedral 109.5 º CH4, CCl4