molecular triplet states: excitation, detection, and dynamics wilton l. virgo kyle l. bittinger...
TRANSCRIPT
Molecular Triplet States: Excitation, Detection, and Dynamics
Wilton L. VirgoKyle L. BittingerRobert W. Field
Collisional Excitation Transfer in the Xe*-N2 System: Proxies for Hg*-acetylene,ethylene
Why Triplet States ?
Reactive (E* 100 kcal/mol) Long-lived ( > 100 s) Difficult to detect (No UV fluorescence) Properties differ from ground state Easily populated unintentionally Unknown: Structure
Excitation mechanisms
Decay mechanisms
Photosensitized Excitation Transfer Our Goal: use atomic photosensitization,
exciting atoms via 2-photon optical pumping Hg* + C2H2 Hg + C2H2*
Xe* + N2 Xe + N2*
A Pulsed Beam Source of Metastable Molecules
Excite an electron on a
closed-shell (1S0) atom
into p orbital
L=1 , S=1,0
J=2,1,0 (L+S,...,0)
Terms: 1P1, 3P0, 3P1, 3P2
Order of triplet sublevels: sign of spin-orbit constant
Hg: 0,1,2 normal
Xe: 2,1,0 inverted
1P1 decays to ground state
3P2 or 0 metastable
3P1 mixes with 1P1 decays
3P0 or 2 metastable
Metastable States of Closed-Shell Atoms
Excite to short-lived 3D2
state via two-photon transition at 252nm
Decays in 28 nsec to the lowest two excited states:
63D2 two-photon
pump state
2 photon transition from ground state
New Optical Pumping Scheme for Populating Xe (3P2)
33% to 3P1 (895nm, 10 ns) decays to ground state
67% to 3P2 (823nm, 150 s)metastable state
Detect N2* B3g A3u emission.
(5,3) and (5,2) bands dominant
Krumpelmann CPL 140, 142 (1987)
Previous Studies of Xe* + N2 by OttingerExcitation Transfer Detected via Dispersed
Fluorescence
Excite Xe by electron
impact or electrical discharge
Excitation transfer via
Xe beam / N2 gas target
or crossed beam
Two Methods of Detection
LIF Sensitive to short-lived states < 10s Determine the number of metastables
produced
SEELEM (Surface Electron Ejection by Laser Excited Metastables) Sensitive to long-lived states > 600s Time-of-flight spectra
SEELEM: Electronic De-Excitation at Metal Surface
Criterion for e- emission: Eel > metal (work function)5.1 eV (Au)
Surface Electron Ejection by Laser Excited Metastables
e-
AuSurface
Co-expand a mixture of Xe and N2
Excitation Transfer in the Molecular Beam
0.1050.008
0.015
0.082
0.0530.151
0.002
Possible Xe (3P2)N2 Metastable ResonancesAnd Franck-Condon Factors
0.096
Xe and N2 LIF:Signals on two different timescales
Xe (3D23P2) @ 823 nm ~30ns
N2 (B3g A3u) @748 nm ~5s
Excitation in Post-Expansion Region .75” in front of Nozzle
Time-of-Flight SEELEM: ‘Slow Collisions’
TOF-SEELEMExcitation in Expansion Region
50 PSIbacking pressure
TOF-SEELEM 120 PSI Backing Pressure
How Well Are We Doing?
0.01 bar, 1 mm3 1014 Xe atoms 2-photon 1% saturated 1012 Xe* Observe 1x106 Xe*, 1x106 N2*
SEELEM Counts: 2500 each Xe* & N2* Xe*+Xe* Xe + Xe+ + e-
Penning Ionization? Associative ionization to Xe2
+ + e- ?
Future Experiments
LIF probe of N2* states 3 Photon excitation of Xe*, Kr*, etc. Ablation jet for Hg*, Cd*, Zn* Hg* on acetylene and ethylene
Acknowledgements
Prof. Robert W. Field Kyle Bittinger Sam Lipoff Jessica Lam AFOSR
The Ultimate Goal: Hg/Acetylene & EthyleneLaser Ablation to the Rescue !
Hg Reservoir
and Acetylene too !
Ablation Pulse
Orbital Mechanism of Excitation Transfer
Xe 5p-1 6sN2 g g*
Hg 6s 6pHCCHu g*
Detection of Xe and N2 Metastables via Fluorescence
The total charge collected…
is the number of excited species
…times the efficiency of the optics
…times the quantum efficiency of the detector at each fluorescence wavelength
…times the gain of the detector and the electron charge
Laser Induced Fluorescence of Xe + N2: Estimating Excitation Transfer Efficiency
Excitation transfer efficiency: calculate the relative number of
Xe, N2 molecules observed during
simultaneous measurement
Many factors are the same in both measurements:
Geometry of optics Laser power Gain of detector Resistance of detector circuit
Number of molecules observed is a function of:
Vave t charge collected
Qe at 823nm, 748nm, 677nm
dtV
RR
tVave 1
en
216
1
F
eG
,eQ
Rearrange equations for ne and
remove constant factors
Calculation based on relative band intensities observed in similar experiments
Laser Induced Fluorescence of Xe + N2: Excitation Transfer Efficiency Calculation
)108(
16
16
1
12
,
1
,
2
,2
e
ave
eavee
eeave
Q
tV
QeGR
FtVn
eGQF
nR
tV
Xe 3D2 3P2 823 nm Qe = 0.21%
N2 B A (4,2)
A (4,1)
748 nm677 nm
1 % 3 %
1% NO2 in He625 Torr backing pressure
90 shot averaging
Speed of beam:
1800 m/s
Doppler broadening limit
using 3mm skimmer:
0.007 cm-1
Measured Doppler
broadening:
0.010 cm-1
NO2 spectra recorded with frequency-doubled CW ring laser
Franck-Condon factors for low-lying excited states of N2
v’ FC factor
E, cm-
1
5 0.1054 475
4 0.1512 -1114
3 0.1907 -2732
2 0.1954 -4380
1 0.1477 -6056
0 0.06105 -7761
v’ FC factor
E, cm-1
6 0.0960 831
5 0.0818 -528
4 0.0618 -1910
3 0.0397 -3318
2 0.0204 -4749
1 0.00746 -6206
0 0.00146 -7687
B3g W3u
v’ FC factor
E, cm-
1
1 0.00802 277
0 0.00158 -1216
B’3u-
v’ FC factor
E, cm-
1
14 0.01487 164
13 0.0532 -891
12 0.0638 -1979
11 0.0744 -3096
10 0.0840 -4245
9 0.0910 -5423
8 0.0939 -6631
7 0.0911 -7867
6 0.0819 -9133
5 0.0670 -10427
4 0.0485 -11748
A3u+-X1+
g (v’’=0)
Gilmore, Laher, and Espy. J Phys Chem Ref Data 21, 1005 (1992)Lofthus and Krupenie. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 6, 113 (1977)
Xe 3P2
energy
Previous Studies of Xe + N2 Excitation Transfer
3P2 state of xenon lies 475 cm-1
below v=5 and 1114 cm-1 above
v=4 of N2 B3g state.
Energy transfer into v=5 occurs w/absolute cross-section of 12.5A2 at avg. collision energy of 452cm-1
a) Ottinger Chem Phys 192, 49 (1995)Krumpelmann CPL 140, 142 (1987)
N2 B3g
Levels
Laser tuned to Xe 63D2 61S0
two-photon transition
Detect Xe* by fluorescence to metastable state at 823nm
(used 610nm long-pass filter)
We have done this before in a cell, but this was the first time for us in the molecular beam
Fluorescence lifetime is comparable to detector response time (28ns)
Two-photon transition probability ~1/10 that of comparable transition in Hg
Laser Induced Fluorescence of Xe* + N2: Preparing Metastable Xe