monitoring and evaluating community system strengthening current css indicators and approaches round...
TRANSCRIPT
Monitoring and Evaluating Community System Strengthening
Current CSS Indicators and Approaches
Round 11 regional Workshop, Nairobi, KenyaAugust 19, 2011
Monitoring & Evaluation
Outline of the presentation
1. Overview of CSS indicators review; rational, objectives, process and approach;
2. The indicator set;
3. Developing M&E frameworks for CSS programs and linking these to the Global Fund proposal;
4. Program review and evaluations
Review rational and process
27 indicators from May 2010 release not incorporated into RD 10 proposals;
Preparing for Round 11 launch; Solicit implementer’s feedback
Assess applicability of the indicators at regional and country level;
To assess the comprehensiveness in measuring community systems strengthening;
Determine whether existing alternatives can be recommended; Assess existing or anticipated challenges measuring the
recommended indicators; Coordinated by TGF but conducted by a partner representative
Technical working group Regional consultations with constituencies
Results overview
1. A set of 29 indicators – all process and output level
2. Two categories - CORE and additional
3. While many are process and output level, core indicators will indicate improvements in the system over time as proxy measures of system/service quality
4. Shows the linkage to health outcomes as presented in a holistic health system approach
5. Clearly identified gaps in the CSS M&E framework for further development;
1. Field testing and Validation
2. QoS framework development – Programs and Community system
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
10 CORE INDICATORS
Core component 1: Enabling environments and advocacy
SDA 1: Monitoring and documentation of community and government interventions
Number of community based organisations and/or networks that have meaningfully participated in joint national programme reviews or evaluations in the last 12 months (1.1)
SDA 2: Advocacy, Communication and Social mobilisation
Number of community-led advocacy campaigns that saw a targeted policy change or can clearly document improved implementation of an existing (targeted) policy within 2 years of the start of the advocacy campaign (2.1)
Core component 2: Community networks, linkages, partnerships and coordination
SDA 3: Building community linkages, collaboration and coordination
Number and percent of community based HIV, TB and malaria service organisations with referral protocols in place that monitor completed referrals according to national guidelines (3.1)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
10 CORE INDICATORS
Core component 3: Resources and capacity building
SDA 4: Human resources: skills building for service delivery, advocacy and leadership
Number and percentage of staff members and volunteers currently working for community based organisations that have worked for the organisation for more than 1 year (4.1)
SDA 5: Financial resources Number and percentage of community based organisations that have a sound financial management system, which is known and understood by staff and consistently adhered to (5.1)
SDA 6: Material resources – infrastructure and ` (including medical and other products & technologies)
Number and percentage of community based organisations reporting no stock-out of HIV, TB or Malaria essential commodities according to program implementation focus during the reporting period (6.1)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
10 CORE INDICATORS
Core component 4: Community activities and service delivery
SDA 7: Community based activities and services – delivery, use and quality
Number and percentage of community based organisations that deliver services for malaria, TB and HIV according to national or international accepted service delivery standards (7.1)
Core component 5: leadership and organizational strengthening
SDA 8: Management, accountability and leadership
Number and percentage of staff members of community-based organisations with written terms of reference and defined job duties (8.1)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
10 CORE INDICATORS
Core component 6: Monitoring & Evaluation and Planning
SDA 9: Monitoring & evaluation, evidence-building
Number and percentage of community based organisations that submit timely, complete and accurate financial and programmatic reports to the nationally designated entity according to nationally or internationally recommended standards and guidelines (where such guidelines exist) (9.1)
SDA 10: Strategic planning Number and percentage of community based organisations with a developed strategic plan covering 2 to 5 years (10.1)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
19 ADDITIONAL INDICATORS
Core component 1: Enabling environments and advocacy
SDA 1: Monitoring and documentation of community and government interventions
Number of community based organisations and/or networks that have documented and publicized barriers to equitable access to health services and/or implementation of national AIDS, TB and Malaria programming during the last 12 months (1.2)
Core component 2: Community networks, linkages, partnerships and coordinationSDA 3: Building community linkages, collaboration and coordination
Number and percentage of community based organisations that are represented through membership in national or provincial level technical or coordination policy bodies of disease programmes and providing feedback to communities (3.2)Number and percentage of community based organizations that implemented at least one documented feedback mechanism with the community they serve in the last 6 months (3.3)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
19 ADDITIONAL INDICATORS
Core component 3: Resources and capacity building
SDA 4: Human resources: skills building for service delivery, advocacy and leadership
Number and percentage of community health workers currently working with community based organisations who received training or re-training in HIV, TB or malaria service delivery according to national guidelines (where such guidelines exist) during the last national reporting period (4.2)
Number and percentage of community based organisations that received supportive supervision in accordance with national guidelines (where such guidelines exist) in the last 3/6 months (4.3)
Number and percentage of volunteers working with community based organisations that are provided with incentives (4.4)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
19 ADDITIONAL INDICATORS
Core component 3: Resources and capacity building
SDA 5: Financial resources Number and percentage of community based organisations that have core funding secured for at least 2 years (5.2)
SDA 6: Material resources – infrastructure and ` (including medical and other products & technologies)
Number and percentage of community based organisations that keep accurate data for inventory management according to national or international policy (6.2)
Number and percentage of community based organisations with staff or volunteers that are responsible for stock management trained or re-trained in stock (inventory) management in the past 12 months (6.3)Number and percentage of community based organisations that maintain adequate storage conditions and handling procedures for essential commodities (6.4)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
19 ADDITIONAL INDICATORS
Core component 4: Community activities and service delivery
SDA 7: Community based activities and services – delivery, use and quality
Number and percentage of community based organisations that implemented activities contributing to the national disease strategic plan as documented by their plans and reports to the national designated entity (7.2)Number and percentage of people that have access to community-based HIV, TB or malaria services in a defined area (7.3)
Core component 5: leadership and organizational strengthening
SDA 8: Management, accountability and leadership
Number and percentage of community based organisations with staff in managerial positions who received training or re-training in management, leadership or accountability during the last reporting period (8.2)Number and percentage of community based organizations that received technical support for institutional strengthening in accordance with their requests the last 12 months (8.3)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
19 ADDITIONAL INDICATORS
Core component 6: Monitoring & Evaluation and Planning
SDA 9: Monitoring & evaluation, evidence-building
Number and percentage of community based organisations with at least one staff member in charge of M&E (9.2)
Number and percentage of community based organisations with at least one staff member in charge of M&E who received training or re-training in M&E according to nationally recommended guidelines (where such guidelines exist) during the last national reporting period (9.3)
Number and percentage of community based organisations using standard data collection tools and reporting formats to report to the national reporting system (9.4)
Number and percentage of community based organisations conducting documented reviews of their own programme performance according to their strategic plan in accordance to national reporting cycle (9.5)
CSS Output/Process Level Indicators by SDA
19 ADDITIONAL INDICATORS
Core component 6: Monitoring & Evaluation and Planning
SDA 10: Strategic planning Number and percentage of community based organisations that are implementing a budgeted annual work plan (10.2)
Developing M&E frameworks for CSS programs
• In country consultations to include the CSS programs and M&E into national strategies – national M&E plan
• View CSS programs as part of the overall health system Refer to HSS/CSS complementarity
• Link CSS interventions to health results and therefore have a comprehensive results framework refer to - CSS results framework
– Show direct linkage to health service delivery
• Link M&E framework to the Global Fund grant through the proposal Performance Framework (select from the national M&E plan or an equivalent)
Example of the complementarity between the Health and community System
INPUTS (HSS/CSS) INPUTS (HSS/CSS)
ACTIONSACTIONS
% of facilities with % of facilities with
capacity (ready) to capacity (ready) to
provide ACT provide ACT
treatment to treatment to
malaria cases malaria cases
(drugs, trained (drugs, trained
staff & guidelines, staff & guidelines,
& diagnostic s& diagnostic s))
Facilities reporting Facilities reporting
no stock outs of no stock outs of
ACTs/LLINsACTs/LLINs
Increase “in-Increase “in-
patient & patient &
outpatient visits” outpatient visits”
(e.g., (e.g., people people
accessing ACTsaccessing ACTs))
% of children % of children
under under
five/pregnant five/pregnant
women that women that
slept under a slept under a
LLIN the LLIN the
previous night previous night
% of % of
uncomplicated uncomplicated
malaria cases malaria cases
receiving receiving
appropriate appropriate
treatment treatment
Annual Annual
parasite parasite
incidence rateincidence rate
HSS SDA: Health HSS SDA: Health
WorkforceWorkforce
-Health worker retention-Health worker retention
Training & educationTraining & education
HSSHSS SDA: Procurement & SDA: Procurement &
Supply Supply Chain ManagementChain Management
-Distribution of ACTs, -Distribution of ACTs,
LLINs and laboratory LLINs and laboratory
equipment & diagnosticequipment & diagnosticss
CSS SDA: Service CSS SDA: Service
availability, use and availability, use and
qualityquality
-Demand creation through -Demand creation through
community community mobilizationmobilization
for LLIN use, involvement for LLIN use, involvement
in PMTCT, follow up of in PMTCT, follow up of
mothers and babies in mothers and babies in
communities and creating communities and creating
awareness of available awareness of available
PMTCT servicesPMTCT services
OUTPUTOUTPUT OUTCOMEOUTCOME IMPACTIMPACT
Outcome Level Indicators
Malaria
1. Suspected malaria cases that have laboratory diagnosis/ Children under-5 with fever (household survey) that received laboratory diagnosis
2. Uncomplicated malaria cases receiving appropriate treatment
3. Women who received two or more doses of IPT during their last pregnancy
Tuberculosis
1. Case notification rate
2. Treatment success rate
Outcome Level IndicatorsMaternal, New-born and Child Health
1. Proportion of women attending antenatal care
2. Proportion of institutional deliveries
3. Children who received DTP3
4. Children fully immunised
5. Drop out between DTP1 and DTP3 coverage (%)
6. Equity in immunisation coverage (Difference in DTP3 coverage in lowest wealth quintile and coverage in highest wealth quintile) (%)
HIV/AIDS
1. Proportion of adults/children with advanced HIV infection receiving ART
2. HIV-positive pregnant women who receive ART for PMTCT
Impact Level Indicators
Health Status
1. Neonatal mortality
2. Mortality due to major cause of death
3. Child mortality
4. Maternal mortality ratio
5. ART survival rate
6. PMTCT transmission rate
7. Confirmed malaria cases
8. Inpatient confirmed malaria cases
9. Future deaths averted
Financial Risk Protection
The ratio of household out-of-pocket as payments for health to total expenditure on health
CSS indicators recommended data sources • Administrative records: organizational routine source documents.
– The records will defer by indicator and organisation and therefore need to be defined at the planning stage.
– Examples: Activity reports, policy documents, monitoring reports, supervision checklists, client registers, training records.
• Institutional Surveys/Assessments: periodic data collection exercises
– gather information on defined aspects of the organisation usually related to performance and or quality standards.
– These are commonly implemented by the national level designated entity with oversight responsibility for community based activities and services.
– either as part of routine supervision or as an exclusive exercise.
– Require predefined service standards and checklists
• Population-based survey - representative sample from population
– commonly implemented by the national level designated program authority with the involvement of all partners.
– CSS implementers are encouraged to participate as much as possible in the planning and execution of the surveys.
20
Program reviews and evaluation
•CSS programs need to plan and conduct periodic program evaluations
•CSS programs encouraged to include impact outcome indicators to demonstrate contribution to health results
•Tracking of relevant core indicators to track improvement in the community system
– For Periodic reviews, the core indicators will be assessed along with the grant impact outcome indicator performance