monitoring the brain: what’s worthwhile?

20
Tony Figaji MBChB, MMed, FCS, Head of Pediatric Neurosurgery Red Cross Children’s Hospital University of Cape Town

Upload: snowy

Post on 11-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Tony Figaji MBChB, MMed, FCS, PhD Head of Pediatric Neurosurgery Red Cross Children’s Hospital University of Cape Town. Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?. Everything. Neurocritical care is underdeveloped Pediatric neurocritical care is even worse - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

Tony Figaji MBChB, MMed, FCS, PhDHead of Pediatric NeurosurgeryRed Cross Children’s HospitalUniversity of Cape Town

Page 2: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

•Neurocritical care is underdeveloped•Pediatric neurocritical care is even worse•Secondary brain injury is underappreciated

Page 3: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

•The brain is complex•Children are physiologically different•Individual and temporal heterogeneity•Many different causes for raised ICP, standard Rx•Surrogate markers of brain health used•Direct measures of brain physiology?

Page 4: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

Brain tissue oxygen tensionNear-infrared spectroscopyJugular venous saturationContinuous EEGMicrodialysisTCD / autoregulationContinuous CBFPhysiological imaging

Page 5: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

1. Classic cellular oedema

2. Hyperemia

3. Vasospasm

4. Subclinical seizures

5. Impaired autoregulation

GCS 4ICP = 35

GCS 4ICP = 35

GCS 4ICP = 35

GCS 4ICP = 35

GCS 4ICP = 35

BrO2 lowCBF↓/N

BrO2 high, FV / CBF high

BrO2 low, FV high/ LR↑

BrO2 low, EEG typical

BrO2 passive,ARI low

Page 6: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?
Page 7: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

Examined associations with outcome in multivariate model: clinical, physiological, radiological

Adjusted Odds Ratio for poor outcome:PbtO2<10 for >2 hoursOR 10.8 (1.4-82.4)PbtO2<5 for >1 hour OR 27.4 (1.9-391)

Strongest independent predictor of outcomeMortality for series = 9.6%

Low BrO2 is associated with poor outcome

Childs Nerv Syst. 2009 Oct;25(10):1325-3

Page 8: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

It is not a surrogate marker of something else

It is not predicted by measures of initial injury severity

Page 9: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

< 20 mmHg < 15 mmHg < 10 mmHg < 5 mmHg

%ofpts

Brain hypoxia/ischemia is common despite observing current thresholds for treatment based on available evidence

Figaji et al, Neurosurgery. 2008 Jul;63(1):83-91

Page 10: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

BrO2

ICP

Page 11: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

N=75 children9452 hrs monitoring

Page 12: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

ICP

PbtO2

MAP

Page 13: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

BrO2

decompressive craniectomy

Can evaluate the effects of intervention

Figaji et al, Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;102:77-80

Page 14: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

ICP

PbtO2

MAP

ICM+

Increase in blood pressure

Pressure autoregulation, intracranial pressure and brain tissue oxygenation in children with severe traumatic brain injuryFigaji et al. J Neurosurg Peds, 2009;4:420-8

Page 15: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

PbtO2 : 28.7 ± 6.8 mmHg

CPP : 64 ± 15 mmHg

FiO2 : 46 ± 12%

PbtO2 : 33.3 ± 11.8 mmHg

CPP : 70 ± 13 mmHg

FiO2 : 47 ± 13%

P=0.002

P=0.021

P= 0.474

Account for CPP change:

Co-efficient 0.3356, P=0.001

4 hour period post-RBCTBaseline values

The effect of blood transfusion on brain oxygenation in childrenwith severe traumatic brain injuryFigaji et al. Pediatric Crit Care Med 2009

Blood transfusion

Page 16: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

ICP

PbtO2

↑FiO2 ↓FiO2

Increase in PaO2

Page 17: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

34 patients, 291 TCD studies

Mean Flow Velocity (MCA):

95 (79-115) range 32-180cm/s

Figaji et al, Surgical Neurology 2009; 72:389-394

Patients are different

Page 18: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?

Yes

No

•Depends on correct application and interpretation•Intervention misapplied can have equally hazardous effects•The treatment may be worse than the problem

•Gives us more information•Lets us know when patients are getting into trouble before an established problem•Helps interpret the underlying pathophysiological problem•Helps us titrate therapy appropriately•Probably reduces secondary injury

Page 19: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?
Page 20: Monitoring the brain: What’s worthwhile?