moore's law for organic tfts: electronic materials
TRANSCRIPT
RESEARCH NEWS
JAN-FEB 2008 | VOLUME 11 | NUMBER 1-2 9
Improving the performance of
transistors by downscaling is much
less straightforward with organic
thin-film transistors (TFTs) because
it has to be balanced by maintaining
compatibility with large-area flexible
electronics manufacturing. Graphical
printing processes have poor resolution
compared with the lithographic
methods used for Si integrated circuits.
Now scientists from the University
of Cambridge, UK, have used a
self-aligned printing technique to
downscale printed TFTs [Noh et al.,
Nat. Nanotechnol. (2007) doi:10.1038/
nnano.2007.365]. The features that
control transistor switching speed
– channel length, gate dielectric
thickness, and gate to source/drain
overlap – can be shrunk from tens of
microns down to 100–400 nm.
“Our work shows that in this way it
is possible to realize printed TFTs that
can, in principle, operate at megahertz
frequencies,” says Henning Sirringhaus.
Switching speeds are improved by
several orders of magnitude, devices
can operate below 5 V, and carrier
mobilities are ~0.1–0.2 cm2V–1s–1.
“This is the best performance reported
to date for inkjet printed polymer
transistors,” the researchers claim.
The self-aligned gate process
developed by the group is key. The
surface of the first printed electrode
is modified with a hydrophobic
monolayer that repels the ink of the
second electrode, resulting in a small
but controlled gap between the two
electrodes. When a photosensitive
dielectric on the top side is illuminated
though the back of the substrate, the
two electrodes, the source and drain,
act as a shadow mask for positioning
the gate electrode.
“The method they are using is simple
and can be easily scaled up,” says
Zhenan Bao from Stanford University.
Pauline Rigby
Moore’s law for organic TFTsELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Conducting in the graphene orchestraELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Graphene’s unique band structure has motivated much
research toward a unified theory of graphene carrier
transport. One of the outstanding mysteries, however,
is graphene’s residual conductivity. With a report by
researchers at the University of Maryland, a fuller
theoretical picture shows that the concentration of
unavoidable impurities explains graphene’s transport
properties [Adam et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA (2007)
104, 18392].
Until now, the theory was that near the Dirac point
(a singularity in the band structure where the density
of states vanishes and carriers are massless Dirac
fermions) graphene’s charge carrier transport is ballistic
and the conductivity minimum is a fixed quantity.
But the new research shows unequivocally that the
conductivity is a function of the concentration of
impurities in the sample.
“Since we knew that the exfoliation technique used
to obtain graphene involves extracting graphene onto
a SiO2 substrate and that the high density mobility
is limited by dirt in the substrate and not in the
graphene itself, we wanted to see if this would also
explain the residual minimum conductivity,” says
Shaffique Adam. “The basic idea is that the disorder
induces carriers that in turn screen the impurities
making them appear weaker.” Their theoretical
framework to determine the residual density of carriers
quantitatively solves the mystery of the residual
conductivity.
The work shows that the mobility below room
temperature in current samples is set entirely by
disorder in the substrate. Thus, changing the substrate
or reducing impurities is the clear road to higher
mobility – a promising idea for future graphene-based
transistors. “By going to cleaner samples or suspended
graphene,” says Adam, “we anticipate a whole host
of new interesting physics that is the subject of our
current research.”
D. Jason Palmer
A schematic of the model where charged impurities
in the SiO2 substrate give rise to puddles of electrons
and holes whose carrier density needs to be calculated
self-consistently. The researchers demonstrate that
this residual density is responsible for the minimum
conductivity. Also shown is a comparison between
theory and experiment for a representative sample,
where the only fitting parameter is the impurity
concentration.
Surface layers allow accurate doping
A novel process for implanting dopant atoms in
semiconductor materials with nanometer precision could be
an enabling technology for the continued miniaturization of
Si microelectronics [Ho et al., Nat. Mater. (2007) doi:10.1038/
nmat2058].
As transistors shrink in size, it becomes increasingly important
to control their doping reliably, particularly for ultrashallow
source and drain regions. Ion implantation and solid source
diffusion are the standard methods for implanting dopants
in semiconductors, but at small scales these methods are
not sufficiently precise to put dopants exactly where they
are needed. In addition, ion implantation induces significant
crystal damage.
Now a team of electrical engineers led by Ali Javey at
the University of California, Berkeley, has developed an
alternative doping method based on surface chemistry. “We
have developed a novel and generic approach for controlled
nanoscale doping of semiconductors by utilizing the rich
surface chemistry of crystalline materials combined with a
self-limiting monolayer formation reaction,” explains Javey.
They use dopant-containing reagent molecules that form
well-ordered, covalently-bonded thin films on the surface
of Si. The molecules are then driven into the Si by rapidly
annealing the samples at high temperature. By controlling the
heat treatment conditions, it is possible to control the depth
to which the dopants penetrate. “The process is highly generic
for both planar and nonplanar (such as nanowire) structures
with the dopant dose and profile being well controlled
through molecular precursor design and the thermal annealing
conditions,” says Javey.
The new approach addresses a critical need for a robust
nanoscale doping technique that can avoid the limitations of
conventional methods, claim the researchers.
“The method was demonstrated for standard Si substrates as
well as Si-on-insulator and bottom-up nanowire materials, and
can be readily implemented to other types of semiconductor
substrate with the appropriate surface chemistry,” says Javey.
Pauline Rigby
ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
MT111_2p7_15.indd 9MT111_2p7_15.indd 9 10/12/2007 15:59:4310/12/2007 15:59:43