moral & philosophical criticism of hamlet real
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Moral & Philosophical Criticism
EH 4301
Moral Criticism
“The best poetry has a power of forming, sustaining, and delighting us, as nothing else can. … More and more mankind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us. Without poetry, our science will appear incomplete; and most of what now passes with us for religion and philosophy will be replaced by poetry.”
- Matthew Arnold, “The Study of Poetry”
Literature
An important source of moral guidance and spiritual inspiration
A worthy substitute for religionextreme position in harmony with critical tradition
Moral Criticism
Moral approach has the longest history. The importance of literature
not just its way of saying but also what it says
Moral Criticism
Critics who concentrate on the moral dimensions of literature often judge literary works by their ethical teachings
and by their effects on readers Literature that is ethically sound and encourages
virtue is praised. Literature that misguides and corrupts is
condemned.
Moral Criticism
Some modern critical theories may make us resist the idea that literature has a didactic purpose.but cannot deny many of the greatest writers
have considered themselves teachers as well as artists.
Moral Criticism
Plato acknowledged literature’s power as a teacher
by believing it capable of corrupting morals and undermining religion
Moralism Utilitarianism
Moral Criticism
Aristotle and Horace considered literature capable of fostering
virtueHorace
Literature should be “delightful and instructive”
Moral Criticism
Attempts to extract literature from an ethical context are misguided and ultimately unsuccessful. Faults New Criticism
Moral Criticism
However, there are other critics/critical fields which promote a moral fervor in their writings: Feminist criticismMarxist criticism