more informative dna identification: computer reinterpretation of existing data ria david, phd...

23
More informative DNA More informative DNA identification: identification: Computer reinterpretation of Computer reinterpretation of existing data existing data Ria David, PhD Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010 Cybergenetics © 2003-2010 Midwestern Association of Midwestern Association of Forensic Scientists 39th Forensic Scientists 39th Annual Meeting Annual Meeting October, 2010 October, 2010

Upload: roger-carr

Post on 29-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

More informative DNA identification:More informative DNA identification:Computer reinterpretation of Computer reinterpretation of

existing dataexisting data

Ria David, PhDRia David, PhDCybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PACybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA

Cybergenetics © 2003-2010Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Midwestern Association of Forensic Midwestern Association of Forensic Scientists 39th Annual MeetingScientists 39th Annual Meeting

October, 2010October, 2010

Page 2: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

SWGDAM 2010 SWDGAM guidelines, section 3.2.2

If a stochastic threshold based on peak height is not used in the evaluation of DNA typing results, the laboratory must establish alternative criteria (e.g.,

quantitation values or use of a probabilistic genotype approach) for addressing potential stochastic

amplification. The criteria must be supported by empirical data and internal validation and must be

documented in the standard operating procedures.

Page 3: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

TrueAllele® CaseworkComputer interpretation of DNA evidenceComputer interpretation of DNA evidenceby mathematically modeling STR processby mathematically modeling STR process

• objectivityobjectivity• • ease of useease of use• • informationinformation• • productivityproductivity

Primary goalsPrimary goals

Page 4: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Interpretation MattersNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyTwo Contributor Mixture Data, Known Victim

31 thousand (4)

213 trillion (14)

Page 5: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Preserving DNA Information Quantitative vs. Qualitative

Page 6: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Data Classification

Mixture items assigned a degree of difficulty

Simple: two person mixture with a known victim

Medium: two unknown mixture samples

Complex: three or more unknown contributors, or a partial profile

Page 7: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

0

5

10

15

20

25

2A 2C 2H 2D 2B 2F 2G 2E

LR2

CPI

Information - two unknown

7.037.03

6.246.2413.2613.26

Page 8: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Information - all mixtures

Page 9: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Locus D21S11

Page 10: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Quantitative TrueAllele

Page 11: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Quantitative TrueAllele

Page 12: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Quantitative TrueAllele

Page 13: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Quantitative TrueAllele

Page 14: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Qualitative Threshold

Page 15: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Qualitative Threshold

Page 16: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Qualitative Threshold

Page 17: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Qualitative Threshold

Page 18: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Stochastic Threshold

Page 19: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Stochastic Threshold

Page 20: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Stochastic Threshold

Page 21: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

13 Locus Statistic

Page 22: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Conclusion

• Forensic analysts’ goal is to get identification information from their data to help solve cases

• SWGDAM guidelines make it more difficult for analysts to extract information from DNA data

• TrueAllele’s approach of probabilistic interpretation is allowed by the SWGDAM guidelines and extracts more identification information than human interpretation

• Using a probabilistic genotype interpretation would enable forensic analysts to better ensure public safety

Page 23: More informative DNA identification: Computer reinterpretation of existing data Ria David, PhD Cybergenetics, Pittsburgh, PA Cybergenetics © 2003-2010

Acknowledgements

New York State PoliceBarry DucemanMelissa LeeShannon MorrisElizabeth Staude

CybergeneticsWilliam AllanMeredith ClarkeMatthew LeglerJessica SmithCara Spencer

Northeast RegionalForensics InstituteJamie Belrose