/..

3'" 4( f7,-0

IN THF, SI7I'REIYIE COURT OF OHIO

AKIM M. RAHM.AsN,

Relator,

V.

WFLLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et. al

Respondents.

Case No. 2013-1700

(Original Action in Procedendo andProhibition)

MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDEN'I'SWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND JOHN B. KOPF III

Akirn M. Ra:hman, Pro Se4428 Trailane DriveHilliard, Ohio 43026Telephone: 614.777.43 3 3

Relccta3°

iSLSi^^' :^; ^ ^•. 1.J

...^^̂ r•;r• . ^;J.,

^,'r's.S..rc:t t}i '•.75^'i^.! j

vUEJN£ >}0%^^ ^ ^^r- 01'1; i

Scott A. King, Counsel of Record (#0037582)Telephone: 93 7.4q•3 .6560S cott. King;,Thompson 1-1:ine. com,'I'erry W. Posey, Jr. (#0078292)Telephone: 937,443,6857Terry°.I'osey,,tThonipsonl-Iine. comTIIC)MPSON HINE LLP10050 Innovation DriveSuite 400Miamisburg, Ohio 45342Facsimile: 937.443-6635

C'ounsel foY Respondents, iYells Fargo Bank,N.fl. and John B. Kopf III

Jennifer E. Schaeffer (#0084893)Lerner, Sampson & RothfussP.O. Box 5480Cincinnati, OH 45201-5480Telephone: 513.241.3100Facsimile: 513.354,6741lennifer, schael'f'errz^lsrlaw.corn

Respandent

MOTION TO DISMISS

Respondents Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Jolui 13. Kopf III move the Court for an Order

dismissing the Complaint of Relator Akim M. Rahman on the grourids that the Complaint fails to

state a viable claim. A Memorandum in support of this Motion is attached.

Respectfully submitted,

Scott A. King, Counsel of Record (#003 75 82)937.443.6560Scott.Kinfz(^a;ThompsonHitie.comTerry W. Posey, Jr. (40078292)937.443.6857Terrv.Posey: c^ThompsonIIine.comTHOMPSON I.-IINE LLP10050 Innovation DriveSuite 400Miamisburg, OH 45342Facsimile: 93 7.443.663 5

AtloYneys for Respondents, yVElls Fargo Bank,N,A. and John B. Kopf III

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF 01110

AKIM M. R.AIIMAN, Case No. 2013-1700

Relator,

V. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OFMOTION TO DISMISS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et. al

Respondents.

1. INTRODUCTION

This is the latest attempt by a borrower in a residential foreclosure action to avoid the sale

of the property. The Franklin County Common Pleas Court ("Trial Court") entered a judgment

against Relator Akim M. Rahman, which he appealed to the Tenth District Court of Appeals.

Mr. Rah.man requested both the Trial Court and the Tenth District to stay the sale of his property

pendirig appeal, and Mr. Rahman was granted that stay conditioned upon him posting a bond in

accordance with Civil Rule 62 and Appellate Rule 7. Mr. Rahman refused, and appealed to this

Court, requesting a stay without a bond. This Court overruled that request and declined

jurisdiction over his appeal from the stay orders.

Rahman has now filed a complaint seeking writs of procedendo, prohibition, and quo

warranto against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), along with its trial and appellate

counsel, John B, Kopf 111, arguing that they have "utilize[ed] its efforts & persuasions for

utilizing governrnent resources, public officials for its private against that has caused fear and

emotional distresses" to Mr. Rahman. The Complaint should be dismissed because (a) the

behavior about which Mr. Rahman complains-enforcing ajudgment-is lawful; (b) Mr.

Rahman possesses an adequate remedy at law; and (c) none of the writs are otherwise

appropriate.

II. BACKGRnUNU

A. Procedural Posture.

On January 25, 2011, Wells Fargo filed a foreclosure complaint against Mr. Rahnian in

the Trial Court, captioned Wells Fay go Bank, 1V A. v. Rahrnan, Case No.11-CV-1095 (docket

attached as "Exhibit A"). On May 2, 2013, the Trial Court entered judgment against Mr.

Rahman. On May 6, 2013, Mr. Rahman filed a Notice of Appeal from the judgment to the Tenth

District Court of Appeals Case No. 13-AP-376 (docket attached as "Exhibit B"). Mr. Kopf was

counsel for Wells Fargo in both the 'I'rial Court and the Tenth District.

On May 3, 2013, Mr. Rahman filed a motion to stav in the Trial Court. Oxz May 16,

2013, Wells Fargo filed its response, objecting to the stay unless Mr. Ralinlan posted a bond.

On May 8, 2013, Mr. Rahman filed a motion to stay in the 1'enth District. On May 10,

2013, Wells Fargo filed a response to that motion, requesting that the appellate court defer ruling

until the `I'rial Court had an opportunity to decide the stay motion before it, and in any event

requesting that any stay be conditioned on Mr. Rahman posting a bond.

On June 17, 2013, the Tenth District entered an Order (copy attached as "Exhibit C")

which granted Mr. Rahman's stay motion, but conditioned the stay upon his posting a $240,000

supersedeas bond by June 24, 2013. On July 1, 2013, the Trial Cotu-t denied Mr. Rahman's stav

motion as moot.

Mr. Rahnian did not post a supersedeas bond. Instead, on June 21, 201 31, Mr. Rah.man

filed a Notice of Appeal to this Court, Case No. 2013-1008, and contemporaneously moved the

Court for a stay pending that appeal. On June 21, 2013, Mr. Rahrn:an also filed a new motion in

-2-

the Tenth District to stay proceedings pending the outcome of his appeal to this Court. On June

25, 2013, the Tenth District denied that motion.

On July 12, 2013, Wells Fargo filed a praecipe with the Clerk of Court for the Trial

Court, requesting an Order of Sale be issued to the Franklin County Sherrif-f

On July 24, 2013, this Court denied Mr. Rallman's motion to stay.

On July 25, 2013, Mr, Rahman filed another motion to stay in the Trial Cour-t and an

Emergency Motion for Stay in this Court. This Court denied the Emergency Motion for Stay on

September 4, 2013, and on October 23, 2013, declined jurisdiction over his appeal. On October

29, 2013, Mr. Rahman filed a Motion for Reconsideration that remains pending.

Briefing was complete in the Tenth District on July 29, 2013, and on September 5, 2013,

the Tenth District heard oral argument.

The property was sold at Sheriff s Sale on October 18, 2013 for $230,000.00. On

November 12, 2013, the Trial Court confirmed the sale. A copy of the Confirmation Order is

attached as "Exhibit D."

B. The CompIaint.

While not entirely clear, Mr. Rahman seems to be complaining that Wells Fargo and its

counsel (including its separate trial counsel, Jennifer Schaeffer of Lemer Sampson & Rothfuss)

have taken actions to execute on the judgment during the pendency of his appeals. Complaint, 3-

4. In addition, Mr. Rahman also complains about the appraisal of the property as well as the

scheduling of the Sheriff's Sale. Ici. In the prayer for relief, Mr. Rahman makes a variety of

requests: a determination of whether "Respondents' efforts .., have violated relevant laws,

regulations and policies in practice," a "determination of whether [Wells Fargo] breached its

mortgage contract," a finding "whether the lower court should terminate the foreclosure case or

-3-

grant a monetary compensation" and a request that the Court "grant a decision on whether

Respondents' alleged acts are violations of relevant laws & regulations ... and whether these

wrongful acts are punishable." Id., 4-5.

IIl. ARGUMENT

A. Motion to Dismiss Standard.

A motion to dismiss should be granted if "after all factual allegations of the complaint

[a]re presumed true and all reasonable infereilces [a]re made in [Relator's] favor, it appear[s]

beyond doubt that [Relator] could prove no set of facts entitling [Relator] to the requested writ of

prohibition." State exYel. Bell v. 7?feiff'eN, 131 Ohio St.3d 114, 2012-Ohio-54, 961 N.E.2d 181, f'

12; State ex rel. CNG Fin, Corlz v. -Madel, 111 Ohio St.3d 149, 2006-Ohio-5344, 855 N.E.2d

473, T 13.

While courts construe factual allegations in a complaint as true for the purposes of a

motion to dismiss, conclusory allegations are not assumed to be true. Fletcher v, Univ. Hosps. of

Cleveland, 120 Ohio St.3d 167, 2008-Ohio-5379, 897 N.E.2d 147, ^j 14, qttioting Mitchell v.

Lawson Milk Co., 40 Ohio St.3d 190, 193, 532 N.E.2d 753 (1988) ("[u]nsupported conclusions

are not taken as admitted by a[Civ.R. 12(B)(6)] motion to dismiss and are not sufficient to

withstand such a lnotiori.").

B. Wells Fargo's actions are permitted by law.

Mr. Rahman complains that Wells 1'argo's efforts to execute on its judgment during

appeal are unlawful. They are not. A prevailing party may initiate proceedings to execute on a

judg.mezzt after a notice of appeal has been filed. Hagood v. Gail, 105 Ohio App.3d 780, 785,

664 N.E,2d 1373 (11th Dist. 1995). The filing of the appeal does not deprive the trial court of

juri_sdiction to enforce a judgment. State ex t°el. State Fire Marshal v. Czirl, 87 Ohio St.3d 568,

-^4-

569, 722 N.E.2d 73 (2000). To the contrary, the trial court retains jurisdiction to take any action

that would aid in the execution of the appealed judgment. State ex rel. Klein v. Claorpening, 6

Ohio St.3d 3, 4, 450 N.E.2d 1161 (1983). These principles have been applied in the foreclosure

context. Triple Flnvs. v. Pac. Fin. Servs., 11th Dist. No. 2000-1'-0090, 2001 Ohio App. I,EX1S

2484 (June 1, 2001); Shu3nay v. Ltrke Chateau, 9th Dist. App. Nos. 1013 and. 1034, 1981 Ohio

App. LEXIS 12382 (Apr. 22, 1981).

The ozily way to cease post judgment proceedings is to obtain a stay of execution.

Hagood, 105 Ohio App.3d at 785. R.C. 2505.09 governs the conditions for a stay: "An appeal

does not operate as a stay of execution until a stay of execution has been obtained pursuant to the

Rules of Appellate Procedure or in unother applicable manner, and a supersedeas bond is

executed by the appellant to the appellee." "Civ.R. 62(B) and App.R. 7 set forth the procedural

guidelines for a stay of execution of a judgment on appeal." T•iple Flnvs., 2001 Ohio App.

I:>EXIS 2484 at *10. Both Rules condition a stay of execution upon the posting of an appropriate

supersedeas bond.

11ere, the fact that Mr. Ra.hman appealed did not deprive the Trial Court of jurisdiction,

and did not stop a Sheriff's Sale from proceeding. Hagood, 105 App3d at 785. If Mr. Rahman

wanted a stay, he was required to post an adecluate'supersedeas bond. Civ.R. 62(B); App.R. 7.

The Tenth District afforded Mr. Rahrnan a stay, conditioned upon him posting a bond. June 17,

2013 Order. 1-le refused to post it, and this Court both refused to stay or accept jurisdiction over

that decision. This case does not involve unlawful conduct, just a run-of the-mill foreclosure

judgment and application of the Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure.

-5-

C. The availabilitv of an adeciuate remedy at law piecludes the issuance of any writ.

That leaves the request in the Complaint for the equitable writs of procedendo, quo

warranto and prohibition. "Extraordinary writs like quo warranto provide extraordinary, not

alternative remedies, and they will not lie where there exists an adequate remedy in the ordinary

course of the law." State ex rel. Johsison v. Talikka, 71 Ohio St.3d 109, 110, 642 N.E.2d 353

(1994). The rights to appeal and to file a motion for stay are adequate remedies at law, and

preclude extraordinary relief through an equitable writ. State ex rel. Mason v. Burnside, 117

Ohio St.3d 1, 3, 2007-Ohio-6754, 881 N.E.2d 224, citing State ex rel. Corrigan v. GYiffin, 14

Ohio St.3d 26, 27, 470 N.E.2d 894 (1984) and State ex rel, Boardii^alk Shopping Center, Inc. v.

Court ofAppeals, 56 Ohio St.3d 33, 34-35, 564 N.E.2d 86 (1990).

I Iere, Mr. Rahman took the legal remedies afforded him: he filed both an appeal and

motions to stay execution of judgment. The fact that he was dissatisfied with the results does not

make those remedies inadequate. BttNnside, 117 Ohio St,3d at 3. The Complaint should be

dismissed.

D. Procedendo andprohibition are not appropriate against a non-g_overnmental actor.

Putting aside the facts that the conduct at issue was lawful and the availability of legal

remedies, there are additional problems with the Complaint. Mr. Rahman seeks writs of

procedendo and prohibition, but neither can be used against a private actor.

"'The wri t ofprocedendo is merely an order fiom a court of superior jurisdiction to one of

inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment." State ex rel. Davey v. Otiven, 133Ohio St. 96, 106,

12 N.E. 2d 144 (1937). A writ of procedendo catinot lie against a party to litigation. Yee v. Erie

County Sherff's L?ep't, 51 Ohio St.3d 43, 45, 553 N.E.2d 1354 (1990).

-6-

Similarly, a writ of prohibition will only lie against a "court or offieer"about to exercise

"judicial or quasijudicial'° power. 67 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d, Mandatnus, Procedendo, and

Prohibition, Section 171 (2009); Goldsteiyi v. Christiansen, 70 OhioSt.3d 232, 234, 638 N.E.2d

541 (1994).

I-le.re, putting aside the adequacy of the legal remedies, neither procedendo nor

prohibition are appropriate. Neither Wells Fargo nor its counsel is a court, or exercising

"judicial or quasijudicial" power. As to these writs, the Complaint fails to state a claim and

should be dismissed.

F. Quo Warranto has no application.

Finally, the Complaint seeks a writ of quo warranto. That writ may be issued against "Z

person who usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises a public office, civil or

military, or a franchise, within this state, or an office in a corporation created by the authority of

this state." R.C. 2733.01. It is used to "to question the authority of claimants asserting right and

title to public offices or corporate franchises." 79 Ohio Jurisprudence 3d, Quo Warranto,

Section 1 (2013).

"I'here are no allegations in the Complaint that Wells Fargo or its cotinsel has been

asserting rights to a public office or improperly possesses the position of a corporate officer. The

Cornplaint should be dismissed.

IV. CONC.LtiSIt)N

Mr. Rahman had an adequate remedy at law to address his concerns. In any event, none

of the equitable writs are appropriate. The Complaint should be dismissed.

-7-

Rcspectfuily submitted,

Scott A. Kiiig (#0037582)937.443.6560Scott.K.ing(aThompsonl-Iine. conl`t'orry W. Posey, Jr. (#0078292)937.443.6857

errl'osey'IhonlpsonHine.cornTHOMPSO:tii HINE LLP10050 Innovation DriveSuite 400Miamisburg, Ohio 45342Facsimile: 937.443.6635

Attorneys.for Respondeizts, Wells FarKo Bank,N. A. and John B. Kopf f III

-8-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon the following by U.S .

ordinary mail, postage prepaid, this 13th day of November, 2013.

Aki7n Rahman4428 Trailane DriveHilliard, OH 43026

Jennifer Schaeffer, Esq.Lerner, Sanlpson & RothfussP.O. Box 5480Ciizcilinati, OH 45201-5480

Counsel

-9-

AIwais 373 S H, St., 23rd FC, 1614 2 ^Cfvdt 3455 H' -i5., 1stFt 1644 l.o-Cr^msr+af: 34S 5. Hgh SL. 1st Ft (614) 529 -no»esl+c 373aHighS+ 4;hF1 at4 525-Juvende 373S Hig9r^t dthPl. {61A 5 --s^!u a iie TraiFiC: 99.5 Kkq1i'^t ls( fP 614 S.-

j^ a7 e'. 4 t tf f .€,^, ^" •; ,^ ., .r{ 6^ ^ i ...Recurds: ^4, S Fiiak^ ^t , 1stF;. , 7 t; 5.., - l_> s ^w'oo7YwQ ,.,%1 q '

. ._..,----

Ca:>e lnfo^`Matian €.)nI€ne

Last Name:

*0 iA ivatsi et9 5carcit

Middle init; Court; AllFirst Name:

CIVIL CASE DETAIL^K.Prevlous Case , I

CASE NUMBER11 CV 001095

JUDGE

COLLEEN ODONNELL

TYPE of CASEFORECLOSURES

COURTROOMCOURI'.ROOM 4F345 SOUTH HIGIi ST'REET4TH FLOORCOLUMBUS, OH 43215

PLAINTIFF(S)Name

E,]WELLS FARGO BANK NA

DEFENDANT(S)Name

[JAKIM M RAHMAN[JJANE DOE UNKNOWN SPOUSE AKIM M RAHMAN[+̂ FRANKLIN COUNTY TREASUREREJP MORGAN CHASE BANK NAE]HOFFMAN FARMS HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION IN C

El CASE SCHEDULE

Date01125/11111011/206114i1102109/1202/23/1205/01/1205/15/1206/27/12

03/11113

AttorneyJENNIFER SCFIAEFFER

AttorneyAKIM RAHMANNO AITORNEY ON RECORDADRIA L FIELDSNO ATTORNEY ON RECORDNO ATTORNEY ON RECORD

DescriptionCASE FILEDINITfAL STATUS CONFERENCEINITIAL JOINT DISCLOSURE OF ALL WITNESSESSUPPLEMENTAL JDtNT DtSCLQSURE OF ALL WITNESSESTRIAL CONFIRMATION DATEDISPOSITIVEMOTIONSDISCOVERY CUT-OFFDECISIONS ON MOTIONSF!NAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE/ORDER (OR BOTH)TRIAL ASSIGNMENT

DOCKETghow All Descriptions ;, Select Docket AllCategory

Date1 V12i1311/11/13

(] 11/05/13®10/21/13g 10i18f13[]10/18/13010F02/13^]10/02/13L]10/01/13[]09t26113LD 09l04/13F,109/04113

09/04/13ii8102/1308102113

E]08I01/1307131/130713 111307/26/1307/2511307125/1307/25i13

L9071251130+07/25113

07/15!13+ 07/121/3

[E07/12113i] 07/12113

07/12/13[+j07112/13M07/11/13[)07101/13

07101l1306/25/13

DescriptionCONF(RMATiON OF SALEASSIGNMENT OF B?DMISCELLANEOUS PAPERMISCELLANEOUS PAPERAPPRAISER FEE - SHERIFFS RETURN OF ORDER OF SALESHERIFFS RETRUN ORDER OF SALE - SERV FEESPROOF OF PUBLICATIONAPPLIED --0AILY REPORTER PUBLICA'FIONCOST BILL SENT - ORDER OF SALENOTICE OF SHERiFF'S SALEMOTION RELEASED TO CLEAR DOCKETMOTION DENIEDENTRYEXHIBITSMEMO FILEDOBJECTION TORESPONSE TOSHERIFFS MOTION TO PAY APPRAISERNOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILEREXtiiBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSMOTION TO STAYLAND APPRAISEMENTORDER WIONE COPY ISSUED FR CO SHERIFFSECURITY DEPOSIT RECEIVEDAPPLIED - DEPOSIT FOR COSTSAPPLIED - CLERKEXHIBITSPRAECIPE TO ISSUE ORDER OF SALEAPPEARANCE FILEDMOTfON DENIEDDECISION/ENTRY

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED - OHIO SUPREME COURT

Case: 11 CV - 001095

STATUSCLOSED

Searzn

i EVex+ Case .l

DATE FILED01725/2011

ExWE3 C. ?

.r

` 4'" NOv e 13 > 2a13 ^ ^Search i t fYext ► y

Image Fiche08472

08468

E1977E1958

0B4300B430

E1954

E19970B390OB354OB354

9B35408295082950829408289

082$7

0B2770B27708277OB277

0B277

0B254

OB25408254

0B25tOB229

0822908218

FrameT06116H59

W73

A94

A94J30

00016P73

K28

K28

K28

G67G62

L06809

N04

T54T53

T52T46

B15E63000000E67E63

K28H30H30V63

Pages5

10

2333

524

57

6

4

134

23

32

OIT106118/13E.7 0511 7 11 3

05/17/13(+ OS/16/130,05116113[+]05/161'13

05/1311305/13/13

C+j05f06113[i)D5J06713t]+ 05/03/13(E 05/02/13®D5/02/13E]05/021130+05102/13[E05/02/13E05102l13]+ 05/02113[+]05102113+̂ 05/02/13[]r 0S/02/13[+] 05/02113[+]05f02/13E105102113G], 05/02113Q05102/13005/02/13[J 05102113j]05102/13M05102/13P+,,05/02/13F,05102113[+]U5102/13,[]05/02/13E05/02113p05/02113F+l 05/02113F-I 05/02113[J.05/02113E105102/13G05102/13E105/02i13[J 05/02i 13rj05/02/13[±i05/02/13l,^f+' 051D2/13`j05/02/13

05/02/130+05/02113[]05/02/13

05102/130422/1304J0411304/03/1304103/13

y^+ 04/0311304/0211304/0211303/27/13

+ 03/26/1303/25/13

c,j03122113E03122113

03?2211303122/1303/21/13

20312111303/20/ 1303/18/1303/18/13

E]0311811303/18/1303/1511303115/1303/15/1303/15/1303/15/1303/15/1303115//3031151":3

[J03/15/1303//511303/14/1303/14/1303l1411303/14/1303/14/13

MISCELLANEOUS PAPERADDITIONAL COST B3LL CREATEDREQUEST COSTBILLADDITIONAL COST BILL CREATEDRECORD TRANSMITTED TO COURT OF APPEALSMEMO CONTRA FILEDMAIL RETURNED -NOT SERVEDMAIL RETURNED- NOT SERVEDAPPEALS CASE NUMBER

NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED - COURT OF APPEALSMOTION TO STAY

ORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGiNAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FiNAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER, NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTiCE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINALAPPEALABL.E ORDER NOTICE F1LEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORfGINAI. COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORfGtNAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF FINAL APPEALAI3LE ORDER NOTICE FILEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDOBJECTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION DENIEDMOTION RELEASED TO CLEAR DOCKETMOTION RELEASED TO CLEAR DOCKETMOTION GRANTEDMOTION RELEASED TO GLEAR DOCKETMOTION RELEASED TO CLEAR DOCKETNUl'tCE OF FINAL APPEAL.ABLE ORDERTERMINATE CASEMOTION RELEASED TO CLEAR DOCKETJUDGMENT ENTRY

NOTICE OF FINAL APPEALABLE ORDEROBJECTION DENIEDDECISION/ENTRYNOTICE

NOTICE OF CASE ASSOC9ATION FOR PRO SE FILEREXHIBITSEXHIBITSMOTIONEXHIBITSNOTICE OF FILING

NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILERMOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILENOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILERMOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILEMEMO CONTRA FILEDRESPONSE TONOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILEREXHiBITSMOTIONORDEREXHIBITSEXHIBITSMOTION

NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILEREXHIBITSEXHIBITBEXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXI-ItL;ITSEXI-iIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSOBJECTION TONOTICE OF CASE A.SSOCiAT1ON FOR PRO SE FILEREXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITS

E1861 G72

OB150 156OB150 H65

E1$42 L20E1$42 L19OB130 V47

OB130 V470B130 E55

OB126OB126

0B126

0B126

081260B126OB126

0612608126

0812608126

0B126OB126OB126OB126

0B12608126OB126

06126081260B12608126

0B12606126

0B103

L86L86

L86LB6

L86L86

L86L86L86

L86L86

L86L86L86L86L86

l88L86L86

L86L86E93E93

E93G76

10ic

101010

1010

1D1010

1010

1010

10

101010

1010105552

08072 R27 1

08072 R25 208072 R19 6

06068 147 83

06068 H77 69

OB055 U90 9

0B050 033 2OB049 H86 2OB049 F75 13

OB0440B044OB043

0803508035

08035

0B0330803308033080330B033

OB033OB033OB033

0B033

06030OB030

OB030OB030

OB030

V34

V30

L87

X72

X66

X59

G34

G32G25

G20G14

G13

012G11

G02

F29

F22F18

F12

F11

22

75

6

9

03/14/1303/14/13

Q03/1411303/ 11 /1303/11/13

C03/11/1303i08/1303/08/1303/08/1303/08/1303/08/1303/08/1303/0811303/08/1303J08113

U03/08/1303104/'f 302/28/1302127/13

E102/26/'f3002/26/13

02/2611302125/13

[+ 02/05/1302J0511301130/1301130/1301/30/13

E10113011301128(13

001/2$113911/1911.2

11/19!12i 1/14d12

n+ 11/13/12El11/08/12qa 11/06/12(] 11/06/12^ 11 /08112[] 11 /08112[]11108/12[+] 11 /08/12G11/08/12[+I11/08112!„+ 11/08/12FT'i 11/07/12[]10i16112

10/15/12[J 10/12/12

10/04/1210102112

0+10/02/12210/01/12p+ 10/01/12[+̂ 10/01/12E 10/01/12'+ 10/01/12E+110101/12f+̂ 10/01 /12^ 10/01/12I,+ 10/01/12a10/01/12n+ 10/01/12[+j10/01712E110101112^,+J10/01112

EXHIBITSEXHtBtTSMOTIONMAGISTRATE ORDERtv1AGISTRATE DECISIONCOURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE FILEDNO'FICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILEREXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHiBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSREPLY tvfEMOFINAL PRE-TRIAL. STATEMENTORDERPRE-TRIAL STATEMENTSECURITY DEPOSIT RECEIVEDAPPLIED - DEPOSIT FOR COSTSNOTICE OF FILING JURY DEPOSITPRE-TRIAL STATEMENTMOTION STRICKENDECISION/ENTRYEXHIBITSEXHIBITSEXHIBITSREPLY MEMONOTICE OF FILINGMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION DENIEDDECiSiONlENTRYNOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILERMOTIONORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGLNAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDSTRIKE SChIEDULE DATESTRIKE SCHEDULE DATEORDER OF REFERENCE ANO NOTICE OF HEARNGREPLY MEMONOTICE RETURNEDMEMO CONTRA FILEDNOTICE RETURNEDNOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION FOR PRO SE FILERMOTION TO REQUES'F JURY TRIALORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF hIEARiNG NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FiLEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICEFILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOT(CE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTLCE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTtCE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARiNG NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILED

060300803008030

06019

06019OB019

OB0150B015

OB015GB015

OB01508015

08015080150B015

0B005OB0030A995

0A990OA992

0A952

OA552

OA940

0A940OA940

QA940

0A934

OA9340A814

OA814

GA805

OA794

0A746

E16960A742

E1883

OA717

F10F09

F05

M05

L99139

K79

K77

K70K68

K63K56

K55

K54

K50

L72C96U450000U19M68

N109

W09

033

031

026

022

075

013

P52P52

D81

072U46G36

R78E41

N49

2

2

7

2

5

7

4

8

2

2

:,ppeats 373 S. High SL. 23rd Fi (614) 525 - 36.^,^4Cn% 3455 tiigttSt 1atFl (614,525-31K1Gpninal: 345 S. 9iP9fi 5t ^st F!. 1614) 525 - 3650Domeshc 373 5 High S•t -SRhFi 614b 525- 4410luvenge 3735 HO St.,4thFf, (6id,525-4411Ju'3eniteTraffic 339 S. Hig1 St., 1st Ft. 614', 525 -5278Rscorcls; .345 & Higtro Sf. 191 Fs. ,.6°,141 525 - 36:25

f i,..r:e . . . .

Last Name;

^1 nA<Yvancati Search

uwY, f ,^^ y ^^

r7i s

s t

-.--- ---- '-- ^ -^--- ----`-- -`^OCCYiy^$ 1 4- :^Li"rE?^ •"' , > ^ ^•.

First Name: Middle Init: Court: All ' Case; 13 AP - UOusl6 t Searoh ,̂

^. i?Zr! f it':, fe;tee>

APPEALS CASE DETAIL1m..Nle ^e^us Case _j

CASE NUMBER CAUSE TYPE LOWER CASE LC CASE ORD DATE DATE FILED13-AP-000376 COMMON PLEAS CIVIL. 11CV001095 05/02113 05/06/13

STYLE CODE: WELLS FARGO BANK NA -VS- AKIM M RAHMANLOWER COURT JUDGE: TRAVIS

APPELLANT/RELATOR(S)Name

MAKIM M: RAHMAN

APP ELLEEIRESPO NDE NT(S)Name

+]WELLS FARGO BANK NAn+ HOFFMAN FARMS HOMEOWNERSASSOCIATION iNC[+]JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA[]FRANKLIN COUNTY TREASURERFjJANE DOE UNKNOWN SPOUSE AKIM M RAHMAN

DOCKE71NG8TATEMENT YTRANSCRIPT NCONSOLIDATED CASES N/A

0- PENDING EVENTS

ORIGINALSTIPULATION DATE N/A

DOCKET

DateQ08/01/13M08/01113R08/01/13.Q0810111•3208101/13p08/01113Q08101/13L.108101113[] 07/091130, 06125/13E06/25/130+ G6/25113.[]06i25113EE06/251?3[]* 06/25i",3006125113[+J06/25113p06/25113[j06/25/13[^-j06124113^+J06/21113I]06/20113;+]06120/13L+306/201130+ 06/201131+106120/13[.]06/20113[^06120/13[J06/20J13E]06/17/13G,+I(16/17/13q+ 06117/13p06/17113[J 06/17113+Q06117113J. 06/17/13

E106117113006117/132106117113[E.06/17113q06112/13006/12113

2113

AttomeyAKIM RAHMAN

AttomeyEL.IZABETH A. CARULLOATTORNEY NOT ON FILEATTORNEY NOT ON FILEADRIA L FIELDSATlORNEY NOT ON FiLE

CALENDAR TYPE REGULAR

ESTIMATE ACTUAL

N/A N/A

Show All Descriptions'` Select Docket Category All

DescriptionORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDORtGINAL. COPY OF FtEARING NOTICE FILEDORIGINAL COPY OF HEARING NOTICE FILEDBRIEF OF APPELLEEPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGMOTION DENIEDJOURNALENTRYNOilCE OF APPEAI. FILED - OHIO SUPREME COURTMOTION TO STAYPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR b1AiLiNGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF QF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGl7LAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGMOTION GRANTEQMOTION GRANTEDJE - STAY OF EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILING

MAGISTRATE

N/A

PROCEEDING STAYMEDIATION

STATUSACTIVE

COURTROOM

N/A

NY

; Next Case #

SUt3/ARG DATE: 09105/13

image Fiche20909209092D909

2090920909

209092090920909

0A050

FrameM02M03M04M05M06M07MO8M09L03

0A047OA047

0A047OA047

we6W86G28E54

Pages

58

332

14

oA045 TOS 2OA045 TD8 2CA045 T08 2

EXHIBIT

B

Q06112t13+06112113(;]06/12/13[]06112/13[}06112/13[^.06112/13E106/12/13.E106110/13[i]06/07/13tij06107/13[>J06/D7113[+j-06107113®06/07/13[]06/07/13[+06/07/13F+106f07!13Q06/07113E06/07/13906/06113[+]05f31113d05/29/13E 05/16/13-105116113'.J05116/13L+)05/18/13^+ 05116/13[+-J05i16J13+Q05116/13E305/16/13[]05116/132051141130+ 05/10/13

05/1-019305/09! 13

0+05f08/13E05/08113

,t^05/08/13[]+ 05/08/13E05/07i13+Q05707/130+ 05/07/13Ej05/07113(]05/07113n, 05/07113E05106/13^+ D5/06/13Q05/08Ji3Q05/06/13["«;05f05f 13

05/06/13q 05/06/13["j05906/13+̂ 05fO8113p05/06/13[]05/08/1300510EJ13E]05f06/13[+]05/06F13[] 04/06/13

PROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAlLtNGPROOF OFREGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGMOTION GRANTEDJOURNALENTRYMOTION TO RECONSIDERPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR N4AILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF RE{'iULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGMOTION GRANTED

JE - EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE BRIEFMOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - TO FILE APPELLEE BRIEFNOTlCEOF CONFERENCEBRIEF OF APPELLANTPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGNOTICE OF FILING RECORDRESPONSE TOMEMO CONTRANOTICE OF APPEARANCENOTICE OF CASE ASSOC7A'FION PRO SEMiSCELLANEOUSPAPERMOTION TO STAYMOTION TO STAYNOTICE OF CONFERENCEPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGPROOF OF REGULAR MAILINGSECURITY DEPOSIT RECEIVEDAPPLIED - CLERKAPPLIED - DAILY REPORTERAPPLtED - FOR COSTSDOCKETING STATEMENT FILEDLOWER COURT JUDGMENTNOTICE OF APPEAL DOCKETEDAPPEARANCE FILEDAPPEARANCE FILEDAPPEARANCE FILEDAPPEARANCE FILEDAPPEARANCE FILEDAPPEARANCE FILEDAPPEARANCE FILEDAPPEARANCE FILED - PRO SE

DA0440A044

OA044

DA0440A044

DA0430A043

0A042

X66X66

J76

E96E96Y57B91

049

OA040 164

OA039 W32OA039 K36OA039 186

0A039 D12OA039 007

0A039 D02OA038 U09

OA038OA03$

0A038

00000000L66

L56

L55

2101

oA045 - T8

IN TI1R COURT OF APPEALS OF (3HIa

TENTH APPI;LLA'T`E niSTRICT

Wells isargo Bank, N.A,,

1'laintif•f-Appellee,

V. No. 13AP--376

Akixxi Rahn-ian, . (REGULAR CAI.;ENDA.R)

Uefendant-Appellant.

.TOURNAI. ENTRY

Appellant's May 8, 2013 motion for a stay of execution of the trial court

ji.iclgrrzexit pending appeal is granted conditioned upon aPpellant's postiiag -vvith the clerl.

of the trial court not later than JtXne 24, 2013, a stipersedea.s or cash boncl in the aniount

Uf $240;000.

J j: r ^ { t

n---------^--Ju^.^gc Wzlliarn A. Klatfi, 3''.J.

'`-.,; ':...^^-^.^ ................• -- ...-_^..^--__...._._^---•-------------^....:.^.Judge Lisa L. Sadler

__ ^^- -- ^^._.. _..........Judge John W. McCormac, retired of theTeiith Appellate District, assigiied to activeduty -under the authority o-f Section 6{.C),Article N, Ohio Constltutioi-1.

cc: Clerk, CUUrt ofAppetaIsClerk, Civil I?ivisiaxx

^ ii `^E#[I3IT

C

0A045 - T9

Court Disposition

Case Number: 13AP000376

Case Style: WELLS FARGO BANK NA -VS- AKIM M PAHMAN

Motion Tie Off Information:

1, Motion CMS Document Id: 13AP0003762 960000

Document Titie: 05-08-2013-MOTION TO STAY

Disposition: 3201

2. Motion CMS Document Id: 13AP0003762 970000

Document Title: 05-08-2013-MOTION TO STAY

Disposition: 3201

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Nov 12 1:27 PM-11CV001095

201102570 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS(kmr) FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. successor by Case No. 11 CVE 01 01095merger to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.

Judge O®onnellPlaintiff,

-vs-

Akim M. Rahman, et al.

JOURNAL ENTRY CONFIRMINGSALE, ORDERING DEED ANDDISTRIBUTING SALE PROCEEDSOF THE PLAINTIFF, WELLS FARGOBANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR BY MERGER

Defendants. TO WELLS FARGO HOMEMORTGAGE, INC.

This cause came on to be heard on the return of the Sheriff of this County, for the

sale of the real estate on October 18, 2013, for $230,000.00, to the plaintiff, Wells Fargo

Bank, N.A. successor by merger to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., and the

assignment by the plaintiff of its bid to Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

(hereinafter "grantee"); and the Court finding that the sale was made in conformity to the

law and orders of this Court, hereby orders the sale in these proceedings approved and

confirmed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Sheriff convey to the said Federal Home Loan

Mortgage Corporation, whose address is 8200 Jones Branch Drive Mailstop 202,

McLean, VA 22102, a deed for the lands and tenements described in Exhibit 'A' attached

hereto and made a part of.

*LSR201102570D165P1700C9*LSR201102 S 70D 166P 1700C9 AWMEMM

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pieas-2013 Nov 12 1:27 PM-11CV001095

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the grantee is subrogated to all the rights of the

mortgagee and lien holders in the real estate to the extent necessary for the protection of

its title, and a writ of possession is hereby awarded to put it in possession of the real

estate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk cause a release (or certified copy of this

entry) to be filed for record to discharge of record the following liens as they relate to the

real estate herein:

A. Mortgage to Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. from Akim M. Rahman filedfor record on December 15, 2003, in Instrument No. 200312150394418, ofsaid County Recorder's Office.

B. Lien filed on behalf of Hoffman Farms Homeowners' Association, Inc.against Akim M. Rahman, filed for record on August 16, 2006, in InstrumentNo. 200608160162284, of said County Recorder's Records.

C. Lien filed on behalf of Hoffman Farms Homeowners' Association, Inc. againstAkim M. Rahman, filed for record on January 8, 2009, in Instrument No.200901080002303, of said County Recorder's Records.

D. Mortgage to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. from Akim M. Rahman, filed forrecord on November 3, 2006, in Instrument No. 200611030220982, of saidCounty Recorder's Records.

The Court Further finds that the plaintiff is the holder of a judgment for the full

amount of the net sale proceeds and that as the successful purchaser, plaintiff is

entitled to a credit in the amount of $222,247,66 and shall be responsible for the

payment of final court costs, property taxes and sheriff's fees, which amount shall be

paid directly to the sheriff for disbursement as follows:

First. Payable to the Clerk of this Court, the net final court costs of $960.00. (Totalcosts are $2,210.00, which amount includes $88.00 for release fees, and totaldeposits are $1250.00.)

Second. Payable to the Sheriff of this County, the sum of $125.00 for preparation of

2

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Nov 12 1:27 PM-11CV001095

Sheriffs Deed, which amount includes $75.00 for Administrative Fees forRecording.

Third. Payable to the Treasurer of this County, the taxes and assessmentslegally assessed against the real estate under Parcel No. 050-009614-00, in theamount of $6,630.84 for 2012 real estate taxes, plus an estimated portion of the2013 taxes pro-rated through November 22, 2013. Grantee to take title subject toany additional taxes, penalties, assessments, interest, and tax lien certificates ifany.

Fourth. Payable to the Recorder of this County, the sum of $36.00 for RecordingFees, to be paid from the deposit held by the sheriffs office.

Fifth. Payable to the Auditor of this County, the sum of $0.50 for transfer tax.

Plaintiff paid a deposit of $750.00.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff pay the sum of $7,002.34 directly to the

Franklin County Sheriffs Office.

Prior Deed Reference: Instrument No. 200312150394409

/s/ Jennifer SchaefferJennifer Schaeffer, Trial CounselOhio Supreme Court Reg. #0084893LERNER, SAMPSON & ROTHFUSSAttorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Jesse Armstrong, per approval rec'd on 11/07/13Jesse W. Armstrong #0089029Martin O. Ginnan #0089947Assistant Prosecuting Attorney373 S. High Street, 17th FloorColumbus, OH 43215(614) 525-3500

SUBMITTEDAkim M. Rahman, Pro SeDefendant

'3

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Nov 12 1:27 PM-1 1 CV001 095

Exhibit "A"

Legal Description

SITUATED IN THE STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, ANDIN THE CITY OF HILLIARD;

BEING LOT N'UNJBER FIVE HUNDI2EI7 FIFTEEN (515), IN HOFFMAN

FARMS SECTION 8, AS THE SAME IS NUMBERED AND DELINEATEDUPON THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK100, PAGE 54, RECOR.p}::R' S OFFICE, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO.

Property 1?ddress; 4428 Trailane Drive, Hilliard, OH 43026Parcei No: 050-009614-00

Prior Deed Reference: Instrument No. 200312150394409

i,l-,D44-le-4A,qL.c. OF7^05o)

pC7<v}lrrb4

-xLOT'

Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2013 Nov 12 1:27 PM-11CV001095

Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

Date: 11-12-2013

Case Title: WELLS FARGO BANK NA -VS- AKIM M RAI-IMAN

Case Number: 11 CVOO I 095

Type: CONFIRMATION OF SALE

It Is So Ordered.

}0 y^ ^ ^'v

/sl Judge Colleen O'Donn.ell

Electronically signed on 2013-Nov-12 page 5 of 5